Ronald T.

Azuma
Hughes Research Laboratories
A Survey of Augmented Reality
301 I Malibu Canyon Road, MS RL96
Malibu, CA 90265
azuma@isl.hrl.hac.com
http://www.cs.unc.edu/~azuma
Abstract

This paper surveys the field of augmented reality (AR), in which 3D virtual objects are
integrated into a 3D real environment in real time. It describes the medical, manufac-
turing, visualization, path planning, entertainment, and military applications that have
been explored. This paper describes the characteristics of augmented reality systems,
including a detailed discussion of the tradeoffs between optical and video blending
approaches. Registration and sensing errors are two of the biggest problems in build-
ing effective augmented reality systems, so this paper summarizes current efforts to
overcome these problems. Future directions and areas requiring further research are

discussed. This survey provides a starting point for anyone interested in researching or
using augmented reality.

I Introduction

I.I Goals

This paper surveys the current state-of-the-art in augmented reality. It

describes work performed at many different sites and explains the issues and
problems encountered when building augmented reality systems. It summa-
rizes the tradeoffs and approaches taken so far to overcome these problems and
speculates on future directions that deserve exploration.
A survey paper does not present new research results. The contribution
comes from consolidating existing information from many sources and publish-

ing an extensive bibliography of papers in this field. While several other intro-
ductory papers have been written on this subject (Barfield et al., 1995; Bowskill
and Downie, 1995; Caudell, 1994; Drascic, 1993; Feiner, 1994a, b; Milgram
etal., 1994b; Rolland et al., 1994), this survey is more comprehensive and up-
to-date. This survey provides a good beginning point for anyone interested in
starting research in this area.
Section 1 describes augmented reality and the motivations for developing
this technology. Six classes of potential applications that have been explored are
described in Section 2. Then Section 3 discusses the issues involved in building
an augmented reality system. Currently, two of the biggest problems are in reg-

istration and sensing: the subjects of Sections 4 and 5. Finally, Section 6 de-
scribes some areas that require further work and research.

1.2 Definition

Augmented reality (AR) is a variation of virtual environments (VE), or

Presence, vu 6, No. 4, August 1997,355-385 virtual reality as it is more commonly called. VE technologies completely im-
© / 997 by the Massachusetts institute of Technology merse a user inside a synthetic environment. While immersed, the user cannot

Azuma 355
356 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
Figure I. Real desk with virtual lamp and two virtual chairs. (Courtesy
ECRC)
see the real world around him. In contrast, AR allows
the user to see the real world, with virtual objects super-
imposed upon or composited with the real world.
Therefore, AR supplements reality, rather than com-
pletely replacing it. Ideally, it would appear to the user
that the virtual and real objects coexisted in the same
space, similar to the effects achieved in the film "Who
Framed Roger Rabbit?" Figure 1 shows an example of
what this coexistence might look like. It shows a real
desk with a real phone. Inside this room are also a virtual
lamp and two virtual chairs. Note that the objects are
combined in three dimensions, so that the virtual lamp
covers the real table, and the real table covers parts of
the two virtual chairs. AR can be thought of as the
"middle ground" between VE (completely synthetic)
and telepresence (completely real) (Milgram and
Kishino, 1994a; Milgram et al., 1994b).
Some researchers define AR in a way that requires the
use of head-mounted displays (HMDs). To avoid limit-
ing to specific technologies, this survey defines AR as
AR
any system that has the following three characteristics:
1. Combines real and virtual
2. Is interactive in real time
3. Is registered in three dimensions
This definition allows other technologies besides
HMDs while retaining the essential components of AR.
For example, it does not include film or 2D overlays.
Films like "Jurassic Park" feature photorealistic virtual
objects seamlessly blended with a real environment in
3D, but they are not interactive media. Two-dimen-
sional virtual overlays on top of live video can be done at
interactive rates, but the overlays are not combined with
the real world in 3D. However, this definition does al-
low monitor-based interfaces, monocular systems, see-
through HMDs, and various other combining technolo-
gies. Potential system configurations are discussed
further in Section 3.
1.3 Motivation
Why is augmented reality an interesting topic?
Why is combining real and virtual objects in 3D useful?
Augmented reality enhances a user's perception of and
interaction with the real world. The virtual objects dis-
play information that the user cannot directly detect
with his own senses. The information conveyed by the
virtual objects helps a user perform real-world tasks. AR
is a specific example of what Fred Brooks calls intelli-
gence amplification (IA): using the computer as a tool to
make a task easier for a human to perform (Brooks,
1996).
At least six classes of potential AR applications have
been explored: medical visualization, maintenance and
repair, annotation, robot path planning, entertainment,
and military aircraft navigation and targeting. The next
section describes work that has been done in each area.
While these do not cover every potential application area
of this technology, they do cover the areas explored so
far.
2 Applications
2.1 Medical
Doctors could use augmented reality as a visualiza-
tion and training aid for surgery. It may be possible to
collect 3D datasets of a patient in real time, using nonin-

Figure 2. Virtual fetus inside womb of pregnant patient. (Courtesy
UNC Chapel Hill Dept. of Computer Science.)
vasive sensors like
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),
computed tomography scans (CT), or ultrasound imag-
ing. These dataseis could then be rendered and com-
bined in real time with a view of the real patient. In ef-
fect, this would give a doctor "X-ray vision" inside a
patient. This ability would be very useful during mini-
mally invasive surgery, which reduces the trauma of an
operation by using small incisions or no incisions at all.
A problem with minimally invasive techniques is that
they reduce the doctor's ability to see inside the patient,
making surgery more difficult. AR technology could
provide an internal view without the need for larger inci-
sions.
AR might also be helpful for general medical visualiza-
tion tasks in the surgical room. Surgeons can detect
some features with the naked eye that they cannot see in
MRI or CT scans, and vice versa. AR would give sur-
geons access to both types of data simultaneously. This
information might also guide precision tasks, such as
displaying where to drill a hole into the skull for brain
surgery or where to perform a needle biopsy of a tiny
tumor. The information from the noninvasive sensors
would be directly displayed on the patient, showing ex-
actly where to perform the operation.
AR might also be useful for training purposes
(Ranchería et al., 1995). Virtual instructions could re-
Azuma 357
Figure 3. A/lockup of breast tumor biopsy. 3D graphics guide needle
insertion.(Courtesy Andrei State, UNC Chapel Hill Dept. of Computer
Science.)
mind a novice surgeon of the required steps, without the
need to look away from a patient to consult a manual.
Virtual objects could also identify organs and specify
locations to avoid disturbing the patient (Durlach and
Mavor, 1995).
Several projects are exploring this application area. At
UNC Chapel Hill, a research group has conducted trial
runs of scanning the womb of a pregnant woman with
an ultrasound sensor, generating a 3D representation of
the fetus inside the womb and displaying that in a see-
through HMD (Figure 2). The goal is to endow the
doctor with the ability to see the moving, kicking fetus
lying inside the womb, with the hope that this one day
may become a "3D stethoscope" (Bajura et al., 1992;
State et al., 1994). More recent efforts have focused on
a needle biopsy of a breast tumor. Figure 3 shows a
mockup of a breast biopsy operation, where the virtual
objects identify the location of the tumor and guide the
needle to its target (State et al., 1996b). Other groups at
the MIT AI Lab (Grimson et al., 1994; Grimson et al.,
1995; Mellor, 1995a, b), General Electric (Lorensen et
al., 1993), and elsewhere (Betting et al., 1995; Edwards
et al., 1995; Taubes, 1994) are investigating displaying
MRI or CT data, directly registered onto the patient.
358 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4

Figure 5. Prototype laser printer maintenance application, displaying

Figure 4. External view of Columbia printer maintenance application. how to remove the paper tray. (Courtesy Steve Feiner, Blair Maclntyre,
Note that all objects must be tracked. (Courtesy Steve Feiner, Blair and Dorée Seligmann, Columbia University.)
Maclntyre, and Dorée Seligmann, Columbia University.)

2.2 Manufacturing and Repair

Another category of augmented reality applica-
tions is the assembly, maintenance, and repair of com-
plex machinery. Instructions might be easier to under-
stand if they were available, not as manuals with text and
pictures, but rather as 3D drawings superimposed upon
the actual equipment, showing step-by-step the tasks
that need to be done and how to do them. These super-
imposed 3D drawings can be animated, making the di-
rections even more explicit.
Several research projects have demonstrated proto-
types in this area. Steve Feiner's group at Columbia built
a laser printer maintenance application (Feiner et al., Figure 6. Adamjanin demonstrates Boeing's prototype wire bundle
1993a), shown in Figures 4 and 5. Figure 4 shows an assembly application. (Courtesy David Mizell, Boeing.)
external view, and Figure 5 shows the user's view, where
the computer-generated wireframe is telling the user to
remove the paper tray. A group at Boeing is developing

AR technology to guide a technician in building a wiring
harness that forms part of an airplane's electrical system.
Storing these instructions in electronic form will save
space and reduce costs. Currently, technicians use large
physical layout boards to construct such harnesses, and
Boeing requires several warehouses to store all these
boards. Such space might be emptied for other use if this
application proves successful (Caudell and Mizell, 1992;
Janin et al., 1993; Sims, 1994). Boeing is using a Tech-
nology Reinvestment Program (TRP) grant to investi-
gate putting this technology onto the factory floor (Boe-
ing TRP, 1994). Figure 6 shows an external view of
Adam Janin using a prototype AR system to build a wire
bundle. Eventually, AR might be used for any compli-
cated machinery, such as automobile engines (Tuceryan
et al., 1995).

Figure 7. Engine model part labels appear as user points at them.
(Courtesy ECRC.)
2.3 Annotation and Visualization
AR could be used to annotate objects and environ-
ments with public or private information. Applications
using public information assume the availability of public
databases to draw upon. For example, a hand-held dis-
play could provide information about the contents of
library shelves as the user walks around the library
(Fitzmaurice, 1993; Rekimoto, 1995; Rekimoto and
Nagao, 1995). At the European Computer-Industry
Research Centre (ECRC), a user can point at parts of an
engine model and the AR system displays the name of
the part that is being pointed at (Rose et al., 1995). Fig-
ure 7 shows this, where the user points at the exhaust
manifold on an engine model and the label "exhaust
manifold" appears.
Alternately, these annotations might be private notes
attached to specific objects. Researchers at Columbia
demonstrated this with the notion of attaching windows
from a standard user interface onto specific locations in
the world, or attached to specific objects as reminders
(Feiner et al., 1993b). Figure 8 shows a window super-
imposed as a label upon a student. He wears a tracking
device, so the computer knows his location. As the stu-
dent moves around, the label follows his location, pro-
viding the AR user with a reminder of what he needs to
talk to the student about.
Azuma 359
Figure 8. Windows displayed on top of specific real-world objects.
(Courtesy Steve Feiner, Blair Maclntyre, Marcus Haupt and Eliot
Solomon, Columbia University)
AR might aid general visualization tasks as well. At
architect with a see-through HMD might be able to
look out a window and see how a proposed new sky-
scraper would change her view. If a database containing
information about a building's structure was available,
AR might give architects "X-ray vision" inside a build-
ing, showing where the pipes, electric lines, and struc-
tural supports are inside the walls (Feiner et al., 1995).
Researchers at the University of Toronto have built a
system called Augmented Reality through Graphic Over-
lays on Stereovideo (ARGOS) (Milgram et al., 1995),
which among other things is used to make images easier
to understand during difficult viewing conditions (Dras-
cic et al., 1993). Figure 9 shows wireframe lines drawn
on top of a space shuttle bay interior, while in orbit. The
lines make it easier to see the geometry of the shuttle
bay. Similarly, virtual lines and objects could aid naviga-
tion and scene understanding during poor visibility con-
ditions, such as underwater or in fog.
2.4 Robot Path Planning
Teleoperation of a robot is often a difficult prob-
lem, especially when the robot is far away, with long de-
lays in the communication link. Under this circum-
stance, instead of controlling the robot directly, it may
be preferable to instead control a virtual version of the
robot. The user plans and specifies the robot's actions by
360 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
Figure 9. Virtual lines help display geometry of shuttle bay, as seen in
(Courtesy David Drascic and Paul Milgram, U. Toronto.)
orbit.
manipulating the local virtual version, in real time. The
results are directly displayed on the real world. Once the
plan is tested and determined, then user tells the real
robot to execute the specified plan. This avoids pilot-
induced oscillations caused by the lengthy delays. The
virtual versions can also predict the effects of manipulat-
ing the environment, thus serving as a planning and pre-
viewing tool to aid the user in performing the desired
task. The ARGOS system has demonstrated that stereo-
scopic AR is an easier and more accurate way of doing
robot path planning than traditional monoscopic inter-
faces (Drascic, 1993; Milgram et al., 1993). Others have
also used registered overlays with telepresence systems
(Kim, 1993; Kim, 1996; Oyama et al., 1993; Yoo and
Olano, 1993; Tharp et al., 1994). Figure 10 shows how
a virtual outline can represent a future location of a ro-
bot arm.
2.5 Entertainment
At SIGGRAPH '95, several exhibitors showed
"Virtual Sets" that merge real actors with virtual back-
grounds, in real time and in 3D. The actors stand in
front of a large blue screen, while a computer-controlled
motion camera records the scene. Since the camera's
location is tracked and the actor's motions are scripted,
it is possible to digitally composite the actor into a 3D
virtual background. For example, the actor might appear
to stand inside a large virtual spinning ring, where the
front part of the ring covers the actor while the rear part
Figure 10. Virtual lines show a planned motion of a robot arm
(Courtesy David Drascic and Paul Milgram, U. Toronto.)
of the ring is covered by the actor. The entertainment
industry sees this as a way to reduce production costs
because creating and storing sets virtually is potentially
cheaper than constantly building new physical sets from
scratch. The ALIVE project from the MIT Media Lab
goes one step further by populating the environment
with intelligent virtual creatures that respond to user
actions (Maes, 1995).
2.6 Military Aircraft
For many years, military aircraft and helicopters
have used head-up displays (HUDs) and helmet-
mounted sights (HMS) to superimpose vector graphics
upon the pilot's view of the real world. Besides provid-
ing basic navigation and flight information, these graph-
ics are sometimes registered with targets in the environ-
ment, providing a way to aim the aircraft's weapons. For
example, the chin turret in a helicopter gunship can be
slaved to the pilot's HMS, so the pilot can aim the chin
turret simply by looking at the target. Future genera-
tions of combat aircraft will be developed with an HMD
built into the pilot's helmet (Wanstall, 1989).
3 Characteristics
This section discusses the characteristics of AR sys-
tems and design issues encountered when building an

AR system. Section 3.1 describes the basic characteristics
of augmentation. There are two ways to accomplish this
augmentation: optical or video technologies. Section 3.2
discusses their characteristics and relative strengths and
weaknesses. Blending the real and virtual poses problems
with focus and contrast (Section 3.3), and some applica-
tions require portable AR systems to be truly effective
(Section 3.4). Finally, Section 3.5 summarizes the char-
acteristics by comparing the requirements of AR against
those for virtual environments.
3.1 Augmentation
Besides adding objects to a real environment, aug-
mented reality also has the potential to remove them.
Current work has focused on adding virtual objects to a
real environment. However, graphic overlays might also
be used to remove or hide parts of the real environment
from a user. For example, to remove a desk in the real
environment, draw a representation of the real walls and
floors behind the desk and "paint" that over the real
desk, effectively removing it from the user's sight. This
has been done in feature films. Doing this interactively
in an AR system will be much harder, but this removal
may not need to be photorealistic to be effective.
Augmented reality might apply to all senses, not just
sight. So far, researchers have focused on blending real
and virtual images and graphics. However, AR could be
extended to include sound. The user would wear head-
phones equipped with microphones on the outside. The
headphones would add synthetic, directional 3D sound,
while the external microphones would detect incoming
sounds from the environment. This would give the sys-
tem a chance to mask or cover up selected real sounds
from the environment by generating a masking signal
that exactly canceled the incoming real sound (Durlach
and Mavor, 1995). While this would not be easy to do, it
might be possible. Another example involves hap tics.
Gloves with devices that provide tactile feedback might
augment real forces in the environment. For example, a
user might run his hand over the surface of a real desk.
Simulating such a hard surface virtually is fairly difficult,
but it is easy to do in reality. Then the tactile effectors in
the glove can augment the feel of the desk, perhaps mak-
ing it feel rough in certain spots. This capability might
Azuma 361
I Head
Head
Tracker
Graphic
images
Scene locations
Monitors
generator
Real
world
Optical
combiners
Figure I I. Optical see-through HMD conceptual diagram.
be useful in some applications, such as providing an ad-
ditional cue that a virtual object is at a particular location
on a real desk (Wellner, 1993).
3.2 Optical Versus Video
A basicdesign decision in building an AR system is
how to accomplish the combining of real and virtual.
Two basic choices are available: optical and video tech-
nologies. Each has particular advantages and disadvan-
tages. This section compares the two and notes the
tradeoffs. For additional discussion, see Rolland et al.
(1994).
A see-through HMD is one device used to combine
real and virtual. Standard closed-view HMDs do not allow
any direct view of the real world. In contrast, a see-
through HMD lets the user see the real world, with vir-
tual objects superimposed by optical or video technolo-
gies.
Optical see-through HMDs work by placing optical
combiners in front of the user's eyes. These combiners
are partially transmissive, so that the user can look di-
rectly through them to see the real world. The combin-
ers are also partially reflective, so that the user sees vir-
tual images bounced off the combiners from head-
mounted monitors. This approach is similar in nature to
head-up displays (HUDs) commonly used in military
aircraft, except that the combiners are attached to the
head. Thus, optical see-through HMDs have sometimes
been described as a "HUD on a head" (Wanstall, 1989).
Figure 11 shows a conceptual diagram of an optical see-
362 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4

Figure 12. Two optical see-through HMDs, made by Hughes Electronics.

through HMD. Figure 12 shows two optical see-
through HMDs made by Hughes Electronics.
The optical combiners usually reduce the amount of
light that the user sees from the real world. Since the
combiners act like half-silvered mirrors, they let in only
some of the light from the real world, so that they can
In contrast, video see-through HMDs work by com-
bining a closed-view HMD with one or two head-
mounted video cameras. The video cameras provide the
user's view of the real world. Video from these cameras
is combined with the graphic images created by the
scene generator, blending the real and virtual. The result

reflect some of the light from the monitors into the us- is sent to the monitors in front of the user's eyes in the
er's eyes. For example, the HMD described in (Hol- closed-view HMD. Figure 13 shows a conceptual dia-
mgren, 1992) transmits about 30% of the incoming light gram of a video see-through HMD. Figure 14 shows an
from the real world. Choosing the level of blending is a actual video see-through HMD, with two video cameras
design problem. More sophisticated combiners might mounted on top of a flight helmet.
vary the level of contributions based upon the wave- Video composition can be done in more than one
length light.
of For example, such a combiner might be way. A simple way is to use chroma-keying, a technique
set to reflect all light of a certain wavelength and none at used in many video special effects. The background of
any other wavelengths. This approach would be ideal the computer graphic images is set to a specific color, say
with a monochrome monitor. Virtually all the light from green, which none of the virtual objects use. Then the
the monitor would be reflected into the user's eyes, combining step replaces all green areas with the corre-
while almost all the light from the real world (except at sponding parts from the video of the real world. This
the particular wavelength) would reach the user's eyes. step has the effect of superimposing the virtual objects
However, most existing optical see-through HMDs do over the real world. A more sophisticated composition

reduce the amount of light from the real world, so they would use depth information. If the system had depth
act like a pair of sunglasses when the power is cut off. information at each pixel for the real-world images, it
 Azuma 363

Stereo glasses
Monitor
(optional)
Tracker
Video cameras
Video
of .Real
" World
real
world Locations] Video cameras

Monitors Video of
real world

Video compositor Scene

Combiner I—
generator Graphic
Combined video images

Figure 13. Video see-through HMD conceptual diagram. Figure 15. Monitor-based AR conceptual diagram.

Figure 16. External view of the ARGOS system, an example of

monitor-based AR. (Courtesy David Drascic and Paul Milgram, U.
Toronto.)

this case, one or two video cameras view the environ-

Figure 14. An actual video see-through HMD. (CourtesyJannick
Rolland, Frank Biocca, and UNC Chapel Hill Dept. ofComputer Science.
Photo by Alex Treml.)
could combine the real and virtual images by a pixel-by-
pixel depth comparison. This would allow real objects to
cover virtual objects and vice versa.
AR systems can also be built using monitor-based
configurations, instead of see-through HMDs. Figure
ment. The cameras may be static or mobile. In the mo-
bile case, the cameras might move around by being at-
tached to a robot, with their locations tracked. The
video of the real world and the graphic images generated
by a scene generator are combined, just as in the video
see-through HMD case, and displayed in a monitor in
front of the user. The user does not wear the display de-
vice. Optionally, the images may be displayed in stereo
on the monitor, which then requires the user to wear a

15 shows how a monitor-based system might be built. In pair of stereo glasses. Figure 16 shows an external view
364 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4

of the ARGOS system, which uses a monitor-based con-
figuration.
Finally, a monitor-based optical configuration is also
possible. This is similar to Figure 11 except that the user
does not wearthe monitors or combiners on her head.
Instead, the monitors and combiners are fixed in space,
and the user positions her head to look through the
combiners. This configuration is typical of head-up dis-
plays on military aircraft, and at least one such configu-
ration has been proposed for a medical application (Peu-
chot et al.,
1995).
The rest ofthis section compares the relative advan-
tages and disadvantages of optical and video approaches,
tion of thedisplay devices. With current displays, this
is
resolution far less than the resolving power of the fo-
vea. Optical see-through also shows the graphic images
at the resolution of the display device, but the user's
view of the real world is not degraded. Thus, video re-
duces the resolution of the real world, while optical see-
through does not.
Safety. Video see-through HMDs are essentially
modified closed-view HMDs. If the power is cut off, the
user is effectively blind. This is a safety concern in some
applications. In contrast, when power is removed from
an optical see-through HMD, the user still has a direct

starting with optical. An optical approach has the follow- view of the real world. The HMD then becomes a pair of
ing advantages over a video approach: heavy sunglasses, but the user can still see.

Simplicity. Optical blending is simpler and cheaper No Eye Offset. With video see-through, the user's
than video blending. Optical approaches have only one view of the real world is provided by the video cameras.
"stream" of video to worry about: the graphic images. In essence, this puts his "eyes" where the video cameras
The real world is seen directly through the combiners, are. In most configurations, the cameras are not located

and that time delay is generally a few nanoseconds. exactly where the user's eyes are, creating an offset be-
Video blending, on the other hand, must deal with sepa- tween the cameras and the real eyes. The distance sepa-
rate video streams for the real and virtual images. Both rating the cameras may also not be exactly the same as
streams have inherent delays in the tens of milliseconds. the user's interpupillary distance (IPD). This difference
Digitizing video images usually adds at least one frame between camera locations and eye locations introduces
time of delay to the video stream, where a frame time is displacements from what the user sees compared to what
the length of time it takes to completely update an im- he expects to see. For example, if the cameras are above
age. A monitor that completely refreshes the screen at the user's eyes, he will see the world from a vantage
60 Hz has a frame time of 16.67 ms. The two streams of point slightly higher than he is used to. Video see-
real and virtual images must be properly synchronized or through can avoid the eye offset problem through the
temporal distortion results. Aso, optical see-through use of mirrors to create another set of optical paths that

HMDs with narrow field-of-view combiners offer views mimic the paths directly into the user's eyes. Using those
of the real world that have little distortion. Video cam-
eras almost always have some amount of distortion that
must be compensated for, along with any distortion
from the optics in front of the display devices. Since
video requires cameras and combiners that optical ap-
proaches do not need, video will probably be more ex-
pensive and complicated to build than optically based
systems.
Resolution. Video blending limits the resolution of
what the user sees, both real and virtual, to the resolu-
paths, the cameras will see what the user's eyes would
normally see without the HMD. However, this adds
complexity to the HMD design. Offset is generally not a
difficult design problem for optical see-through displays.
While the user's eye can rotate with respect to the posi-
tion of the HMD, the resulting errors are tiny. Using the
eye's center of rotation as the viewpoint in the computer
graphics model should eliminate any need for eye track-
ing in an optical see-through HMD (Holloway, 1995).
Video blending offers the following advantages over
optical blending:
 Azuma 365

Flexibility in Composition Strategies. A basic prob- sive and add weight to the HMD. Wide field-of-view
lem with optical see-through is that the virtual objects
do not completely obscure the real world objects, be-
cause the optical combiners allow light from both virtual
and real sources. Building an optical see-through HMD
that can selectively shut out the light from the real world
is difficult. In a normal optical system, the objects are
designed to be in focus at only one point in the optical
path: the user's eye. Any filter that would selectively
block out light must be placed in the optical path at a
point where the image is in focus, which obviously can-
systems are an exception to the general trend of optical
approaches being simpler and cheaper than video ap-
proaches.
Matching the Delay between Real and Virtual
Views. Video offers an approach for reducing or avoid-
ing problems causedl^y temporal mismatches between
the real and virtual images. Optical see-through HMDs
offer an almost instantaneous view of the real world but
a delayed view of the virtual. This temporal mismatch

not be the user's eye. Therefore, the optical system must can cause problems. With video approaches, it is possible

have two places where the image is in focus: at the user's to delay the video of the real world to match the delay

eye and the point of the hypothetical filter. This require-
ment makes the optical design much more difficult and
complex. No existing optical see-through HMD blocks
incoming light in this fashion. Thus, the virtual objects
appear ghostlike and semitransparent. This appearance
damages the illusion of reality because occlusion one
of the strongest depth cues. In contrast, video see-
through far more flexible about how it merges the real digitized image of the real scene. This digitized image
is
and virtual images. Since both the real and virtual are
from the virtual image stream. For details, see Section
4.3.
Additional Registration Strategies. In optical see-
through, the only information the system has about the
is user's head location comes from the head tracker. Video
blending provides another source of information: the
means that video approaches can employ additional reg-

available in digital form, video see-through compositors
can, on a pixel-by-pixel basis, take the real, or the virtual, Section 4.4 describes these in more detail.
or some blend between the two to simulate transpar-
ency. Because of this flexibility, video see-through may
ultimately produce more compelling environments than
optical see-through approaches.
Wide Field of View. Distortions in optical systems
are a function of the radial distance away from the opti-
cal axis. The further one looks away from the center of
istration strategies unavailable to optical approaches.
Matching the Rrightness of Real and Virtual
Objects. This advantage is discussed in Section 3.3.
Both optical and video technologies have their roles,
and the choice of technology depends on the application
requirements. Many of the mechanical assembly and
repair prototypes use optical approaches, possibly be-
cause of the cost and safety issues. If successful, the

the view, the larger the distortions get. A digitized image equipment would have to be replicated in large numbers
taken through a distorted optical system can be undis- to equip workers on a factory floor. In contrast, most of
torted by applying image processing techniques to un- the prototypes for medical applications use video ap-
warp the image, provided that the optical distortion is proaches, probably for the flexibility in blending real and
well characterized. This requires significant amounts of virtual and for the additional registration strategies of-
computation, but this constraint will be less important in fered.
the future as computers become faster. It is harder to
build wide field-of-view displays with optical see-
3.3 Focus and Contrast
through techniques. Any distortions of the user's view of
the real world must be corrected optically, rather than Focus can be a problem for both optical and video
digitally, because the system has no digitized image of approaches. Ideally, the virtual should match the real. In
the real world to manipulate. Complex optics are expen- a video-based system, the combined virtual and real im-
366 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
age will be projected at the same distance by the monitor
or HMD optics. However, depending on the video cam-
era's depth-of-field and focus settings, parts of the real
world may not be in focus. In typical graphics software,
everything is rendered with a pinhole model, so all the
graphic objects, regardless of distance, are in focus. To
overcome this, the graphics could be rendered to simu-
late a limited depth of field, and the video camera might
have an autofocus lens.
In the optical case, the virtual image is projected at
some distance away from the user. This distance may be
adjustable, although it is often fixed. Therefore, while
the real objects are at varying distances from the user,
the virtual objects are all projected to the same distance.
If the virtual and real distances are not matched for the
particular objects that the user is looking at, it may not
be possible to clearly view both simultaneously.
Contrast is another issue because of the large dynamic
range in real environments and in what the human eye
can detect. Ideally, the brightness of the real and virtual
objects should be appropriately matched. Unfortunately,
in the worst case scenario, this means the system must
match a very large range of brightness levels. The eye is a
logarithmic detector, where the brightest light that it
can handle is about 11 orders of magnitude greater than
the smallest, including both dark-adapted and light-
adapted eyes. In any one adaptation state, the eye can
cover about six orders of magnitude. Most display de-
vices cannot come close to this level of contrast. This
limitation is a particular problem with optical technolo-
gies, because the user has a direct view of the real world.
If the real environment is too bright, it will wash out the
virtual image. If the real environment is too dark, the
virtual image will wash out the real world. Contrast
problems are not as severe with video, because the video
cameras themselves have limited dynamic response. The
view of both the real and virtual is generated by the
monitor, so everything must be clipped or compressed
into the monitor's dynamic range.
3.4 Portability
In almost all virtual environment systems, the user
is not encouraged to walk around much. Instead, the
user navigates by "flying" through the environment,
walking on a treadmill, or driving some mockup of a
vehicle. Whatever the technology, the result is that the
user stays in one place in the real world.
Some AR applications, however, will need to support
a user who will walk around a large environment. AR
requires that the user actually be at the place where the
task is to take place. "Flying," as performed in a VE sys-
tem, is no longer an option. If a mechanic needs to go to
the other side of a jet engine, she must physically move
herself and the display devices she wears. Therefore, AR
systems will place a premium on portability, especially
the ability to walk around outdoors, away from con-
trolled environments. The scene generator, the HMD,
and the tracking system must all be self-contained and
capable of surviving exposure to the environment. If this
capability is achieved, many more applications that have
not been tried will become available. For example, the
ability to annotate the surrounding environment could
be useful to soldiers, hikers, or tourists in an unfamiliar
new location.
3.5 Comparison Against
Virtual Environments
requirements of AR can be summa-
The overall
rized by comparing them against those for virtual envi-
ronments, for the three basic subsystems that they re-
quire.
1. Scene Generator. Rendering is not currently one of
the major problems in AR. VE systems have much
higher requirements for realistic images because
they completely replace the real world with the
virtual environment. In AR, the virtual images only
supplement the real world. Therefore, fewer virtual
objects need to be drawn, and they do not neces-
sarily have to be realistically rendered in order to
serve the purposes of the application. For example,
in the annotation applications, text and 3D wire-
frame drawings might suffice. Ideally, photorealis-
tic graphic objects would be seamlessly merged
with the real environment (see Section 7), but
more basic problems have to be solved first.

2. Display Device. The display devices used in AR
may have less stringent requirements than VE sys-
tems demand, again because AR does not replace
the real world. For example, monochrome displays
may be adequate for some AR applications, while
virtually all VE systems today use full color. Optical
see-through HMDs with a small field of view may
be satisfactory because the user can still see the real
world with his peripheral vision; the see-through
HMD does not shut off the user's normal field of
view. Furthermore, the resolution of the monitor
in an optical see-through HMD might be lower
than what a user would tolerate in a VE applica-
tion, since the optical see-through HMD does not
reduce the resolution of the real environment.
3. Tracking and Sensing. While in the previous two
cases AR had lower requirements than VE, that is
not the case for tracking and sensing. In this area,
the requirements for AR are much stricter than
those for VE systems. A major reason for this is the
registration problem, which is described in the
next section. The other factors that make the track-
ing and sensing requirements higher are described
in Section 5.
4 Registration
4.1 The Registration Problem
One of the most problems currently limiting
basic
augmented reality applications is the registration prob-
lem. The objects in the real and virtual worlds must be
properly aligned with respect to each other, or the illu-
sion that the two worlds coexist will be compromised.
More seriously, many applications demand accurate reg-
istration. For example, recall the needle biopsy applica-
tion. If the virtual object is not where the real tumor is,
the surgeon will miss the tumor and the biopsy will fail.
Without accurate registration, augmented reality will not
be accepted in many applications.
Registration problems also exist in virtual environ-
ments, but they are not nearly as serious because they are
harder to detect than in augmented reality. Since the
user only sees virtual objects in VE applications, registra-
Azuma 367
tion errorsresult in visual-kinesthetic and visual-proprio-
ceptive conflicts. Such conflicts between different hu-
man senses may be a source of motion sickness (Pausch
et al., 1992). Because the kinesthetic and proprioceptive
systems are much less sensitive than the visual system,
visual-kinesthetic and visual-proprioceptive conflicts are
less noticeable than visual-visual conflicts. For example, a
user wearing a closed-view HMD might hold up her real
hand and see a virtual hand. This virtual hand should be
displayed exactly where she would see her real hand, if
she were not wearing an HMD. But if the virtual hand is
wrong by five millimeters, she may not detect that unless
actively looking for such errors. The same error is much
more obvious in a see-through HMD, where the conflict
is visual-visual.
Furthermore, a phenomenon known as visual capture
(Welch, 1978) makes it even more difficult to detect
such registration errors. Visual capture is the tendency of
the brain to believe what it sees rather than what it feels,
hears, and so on. That is, visual information tends to
override all other senses. When watching a television
program, a viewer believes the sounds come from the
mouths of the actors on the screen, even though they
actually come from a speaker in the TV. Ventriloquism
works because of visual capture. Similarly, a user might
believe that her hand is where the virtual hand is drawn,
rather than where her real hand actually is, because of
visual capture. This effect increases the amount of regis-
tration error users can tolerate in virtual environment
systems. If the errors are systematic, users might even be
able to adapt to the new environment, given a long ex-
posure time of several hours or days (Welch, 1978).
Augmented reality demands much more accurate reg-
istration than do virtual environments (Azuma, 1993).
Imagine the same scenario of a user holding up her
hand, but this time wearing a see-through HMD. Regis-
tration errors now result in visual-visual conflicts be-
tween the images of the virtual and real hands. Such
conflicts are easy to detect because of the resolution of
the human eye and the sensitivity of the human visual
system to differences. Even tiny offsets in the images of
the real and virtual hands are easy to detect.
What angular accuracy is needed for good registration
in augmented reality? A simple demonstration will show
368 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
the order of magnitude required. Take out a dime and
hold it at arm's length, so that it looks like a circle. The
diameter of the dime covers about 1.2 to 2.0 degrees of
arc, depending on your arm length. In comparison, the
width of a full moon is about 0.5 degrees of arc! Now
imagine a virtual object superimposed on a real object,
but offset by the diameter of the full moon. Such a dif-
ference would be easy to detect. Thus, the angular accu-
racy required is a small fraction of a degree. The lower
limit is bounded by the resolving power of the human
eye itself. The central part of the retina is called the fo-
vea; it has the highest density of color-detecting cones,
about 120 per degree of arc, corresponding to a spacing
of half a minute of arc (Jain, 1989). Observers can dif-
ferentiate between a dark and light bar grating when
each bar subtends about one minute of arc, and under
special circumstances they can detect even smaller differ-
ences (Doenges, 1985). However, existing HMD track-
ers and displays are not capable of providing one minute
of arc in accuracy, so the present achievable accuracy is
much worse than that ultimate lower bound. In practice,
errors of a few pixels are detectable in modern HMDs.
Registration of real and virtual objects is not limited
to AR. Special-effects artists seamlessly integrate com-
puter-generated 3D objects with live actors in film and
video. The difference lies in the amount of control avail-
able. With film, a director can carefully plan each shot,
and artists can spend hours per frame, adjusting each by
hand if necessary, to achieve perfect registration. As an
interactive medium, AR is far more difficult to work
with. The AR system cannot control the motions of the
HMD wearer. The user looks where she wants, and the
system must respond within tens of milliseconds.
Registration errors are difficult to adequately control
because of the high accuracy requirements and the nu-
merous sources of error. These sources of error can be
divided into two types: static and dynamic. Static errors
are the ones that cause registration errors even when the
user's viewpoint and the objects in the environment re-
main completely still. Dynamic errors are the ones that
have no effect until either the viewpoint or the objects
begin moving.
For current HMD-based systems, dynamic errors are
by far the largest contributors to registration errors, but
static errors cannot be ignored either. The next two sec-
tions discuss static and dynamic errors and what has
been done to reduce them. See Hollo way (1995) for a
thorough analysis of the sources and magnitudes of reg-
istration errors.
4.2 Static Errors
The four main sources of static errors are:
•
Optical distortion
•
Errors in the tracking system
•
Mechanical misalignments
•
Incorrect viewing parameters (e.g., field of view,
tracker-to-eye position and orientation, interpupil-
lary distance )
4.2.1 Distortion in the Optics. Optical distor-
tions exist in most camera and lens systems, both in the
cameras that record the real environment and in the op-
tics used for the display. Because distortions are usually a
function of the radial distance away from the optical axis,
wide field-of-view displays can be especially vulnerable to
this error. Near the center of the field of view, images are
relatively undistorted, but far away from the center, im-
age distortion can be large. For example, straight lines
may appear curved. In a see-through HMD with narrow
field-of-view displays, the optical combiners add virtually
no distortion, so the user's view of the real world is not
warped. However, the optics used to focus and magnify
the graphic images from the display monitors can intro-
duce distortion. This mapping of distorted virtual im-
ages on top of an undistorted view of the real world
causes static registration errors. The cameras and displays
may also have nonlinear distortions that cause errors
(Deering, 1992).
Optical distortions are usually systematic errors, so
they can be mapped and compensated. This mapping
may not be trivial, but it is often possible. For example,
(Robinett and Rolland, 1992) describes the distortion of
one commonly used set of HMD optics. The distortions
might be compensated by additional optics. Edwards
and colleages (1993) describe such a design for a video
see-through HMD. Eliminating distortion can be a diffi-

cult design problem, though, and it adds weight, which
is not desirable in HMDs. An alternate approach is to do
the compensation digitally by image-warping tech-
niques, both on the digitized video and the graphic im-
ages. Typically, this involves predistorting the images so
that they will appear undistorted after being displayed
(Watson and Hodges, 1995). Another way to perform
digital compensation on the graphics is to apply the pre-
distortion functions on the vertices of the polygons, in
screen space, before rendering (Rolland and Hopkins,
1993). This requires subdividing polygons that cover
large areas in screen space. Both digital compensation
methods can be computationally expensive, often requir-
ing special hardware to accomplish in real time. Hollo-
way determined that the additional system delay re-
quired by the distortion compensation adds more
registration error than the distortion compensation re-
moves, for typical head motion (Holloway, 1995).
4.2.2 Errors in the Tracking System. Errors in
the reported outputs from the tracking and sensing sys-
tems are often the most serious type of static registration
errors. These distortions are not easy to measure and
eliminate, because that requires another "3D ruler" that
is more accurate than the tracker being tested. These
errors are often nonsystematic and difficult to fully char-
acterize. Almost all commercially available tracking sys-
tems are not accurate enough to satisfy the requirements
of AR systems. Section 5 discusses this important topic
further.
4.2.3 Mechanical Misalignments. Mechanical
misalignments discrepancies between the model or
are
specification of the hardware and the actual physical
properties of the real system. For example, the combin-
ers, optics, and monitors in an optical see-through
HMD may not be at the expected distances or orienta-
tions with respect to each other. If the frame is not suffi-
ciently rigid, the various component parts may change
their relative positions as the user moves around, causing
errors. Mechanical misalignments can cause subtle
changes in the position and orientation of the projected
virtual images that are difficult to compensate. While
Azuma 369
some alignment errors can be calibrated, for many others
it may be more effective to "build it right" initially.
4.2.4 Incorrect Viewing Parameters. Incorrect
viewing parameters, the last major source of static regis-
tration errors, be thought of as a special case of
can
alignment for
errors which calibration techniques can be
applied. Viewing parameters specify how to convert the
reported head or camera locations into viewing matrices
used by the scene generator to draw the graphic images.
For an HMD-based system, these parameters include:
•
Center of projection and viewport dimensions
•
Offset, both in translation and orientation, between
the location of the head tracker and the user's eyes
•
Field of view
Incorrect viewing parameters cause systematic static
errors. Take the example of a head tracker located above
a user's eyes. If the vertical translation offsets between
the tracker and the eyes are too small, all the virtual ob-
jects will appear lower than they should.
In some systems, the viewing parameters are estimated
by manual adjustments, in a nonsystematic fashion. Such
approaches proceed as follows: Place a real object in the
environment and attempt to register a virtual object with
that real object. While wearing the HMD or positioning
the cameras, move to one viewpoint or a few selected
viewpoints and manually adjust the location of the vir-
tual object and the other viewing parameters until the
registration "looks right." This action may achieve satis-
factory results if the environment and the viewpoint re-
main static. However, such approaches require a skilled
user and generally do not achieve robust results for many
viewpoints. Achieving good registration from a single
viewpoint is much easier than achieving registration
from a wide variety of viewpoints using a single set of
parameters. Usually what happens is satisfactory registra-
tion at one viewpoint, but when the user walks to a sig-
nificantly different viewpoint, the registration is inaccu-
rate because of incorrect viewing parameters or tracker
distortions. This means many different sets of param-
eters must be used—a less than satisfactory solution.
Another approach is to directly measure the param-
eters, using various measuring tools and sensors. For
370 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
example, a commonly used optometrist's tool can mea-
sure the interpupillary distance. Rulers might measure
the offsets between the tracker and eye positions. Cam-
eras could be placed where the user's eyes would nor-
mally be in an optical see-through HMD. By recording
what the camera sees of the real environment through
the see-through HMD, one might be able to determine
several viewing parameters. So far, direct measurement
techniques have enjoyed limited success (Janin et al.,
1993).
View-based tasks are another approach to calibration.
These ask the user to perform various tasks that set up
geometric constraints. By performing several tasks,
enough information is gathered to determine the view-
ing parameters. For example, Azuma and Bishop (1994)
asked a user wearing an optical see-through HMD to
look straight through a narrow pipe mounted in the real
environment. This sets up the constraint that the user's
eye must be located along a line through the center of
the pipe. Combining this with other tasks created
enough constraints so that all the viewing parameters
could be measured. Caudell and Mizell (1992) used a
different set of tasks, involving lining up two circles that
specified a cone in the real environment. Oishi and Tachi
(1996) move virtual cursors to appear on top of beacons
in the real environment. All view-based tasks rely upon
the user accurately performing the specified task and
assume the tracker is accurate. If the tracking and sens-
ing equipment is not accurate, then multiple measure-
ments must be taken and optimizers used to find the
"best-fit" solution (Janin et al., 1993).
For video-based systems, an extensive body of litera-
ture exists in the robotics and photogrammetry commu-
nities on camera calibration techniques; see the refer-
ences in (Lenz and Tsai, 1988) for a start. Such
techniques compute a camera's viewing parameters by
taking several pictures of an object of fixed and some-
times unknown geometry. These pictures must be taken
from different locations. Matching points in the 2D im-
ages with corresponding 3D points on the object sets up
mathematical constraints. With enough pictures, these
constraints determine the viewing parameters and the
3D location of the calibration object. Alternatively, they
can serve to drive an optimization routine that will
search for the best set of viewing parameters that fits the
collected data. Several AR systems have used camera cali-
bration techniques, including (Drascic and Milgrana,
1991; ARGOS, 1994; Bajura, 1993; Tuceryan et al.,
1995; Whitaker et al., 1995).
4.3 Dynamic Errors
Dynamic errors occur because of system delays, or
lags. The end-to-end system delay is defined as the time
difference between the moment that the tracking system
measures the position and orientation of the viewpoint
to the moment when the generated images correspond-
ing to that position and orientation appear in the dis-
plays. These delays exist because each component in an
augmented reality system requires some time to do its
job. The delays in the tracking subsystem, the communi-
cation delays, the time it takes the scene generator to
draw the appropriate images in the frame buffers, and
the scanout time from the frame buffer to the displays all
contribute to end-to-end lag. End-to-end delays of 100
ms are fairly typical on existing systems. Simpler systems
can have less delay, but other systems have more. Delays
of 250 ms or more can exist on slow, heavily loaded, or
networked systems.
End-to-end system delays cause registration errors
only when motion occurs. Assume that the viewpoint
and all objects remain still. Then the lag does not cause
registration errors. No matter how long the delay is, the
images generated are appropriate, since nothing has
moved since the time the tracker measurement was
taken. Compare this to the case with motion. For ex-
ample, assume a user wears a see-through HMD and
moves her head. The tracker measures the head at an
initial time t. The images corresponding to time iwill
not appear until some future time t2, because of the end-
to-end system delays. During this delay, the user's head
remains in motion, so when the images computed at
time t finally appear, the user sees them at a different
location than the one for which they were computed.
Thus, the images are incorrect for the time they are actu-
ally viewed. To the user, the virtual objects appear to

Figure 17. Effect of motion and system delays on registration. Picture on the left is a static scene. Picture on the right shows motion. (Courtesy
UNC Chapel Hill Dept. of Computer Science.)
"swim around" and "lag behind" the real objects. This
delay was graphically demonstrated in a videotape of
UNC's ultrasound experiment shown at SIGGRAPH
'92 (Bajura et al., 1992). In Figure 17, the picture on
the left shows what the registration looks like when ev-
erything stands still. The virtual gray trapezoidal region
represents what the ultrasound wand is scanning. This
virtual trapezoid should be attached to the tip of the real
ultrasound wand, as it is in the picture on the left, where
the tip of the wand is visible at the bottom of the pic-
ture, to the left of the "UNC" letters. But when the
head or the wand moves, large dynamic registration er-
rors occur, as shown in the picture on the right. The tip
of the wand is now far away from the virtual trapezoid.
Aso note the motion blur in the background, caused by
the user's head motion.
System delays seriously hurt the illusion that the real
and virtual worlds coexist because they cause large regis-
tration errors. With a typical end-to-end lag of 100 ms
and a moderate head rotation rate of 50 degrees per sec-
ond, the angular dynamic error is 5 degrees. At a 68 cm
arm length, this results in registration errors of almost
60 mm. System delay is the largest single source of regis-
tration error in existing AR systems, outweighing all
others combined ( Hollo way, 1995).
Azuma 371
Methods used to reduce dynamic registration fall un-
der four main categories:
•
Reduce system lag
•
Reduce apparent lag
•
Match temporal streams (with video-based systems)
•
Predict future locations
4.3.1 Reduce System Lag. The most direct ap-
proach is simply to reduce, or ideally eliminate, the sys-
tem delays. If there are no delays, there are no dynamic
errors. Unfortunately, modern scene generators are usu-
ally built for throughput, not minimal latency (Foley et
al., 1990; Mine, 1993). It is sometimes possible to re-
configure the software to sacrifice throughput to mini-
mize latency. For example, the SLATS system completes
rendering a pair of interlaced NTSC images in one field
time (16.67 ms) on Pixel-Planes 5 (Olano et al., 1995).
Being careful about synchronizing pipeline tasks can also
reduce the end-to-end lag (Wloka, 1995).
System delays are not likely to completely disappear
anytime soon. Some believe that the current course of
technological development will automatically solve this
problem. Unfortunately, it is difficult to reduce system
delays to the point where they are no longer an issue.
372 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
Recall that registration errors must be kept to a small
fraction of a degree. At the moderate head rotation rate
of 50 degrees per second, system lag must be 10 ms or
less to keep angular errors below 0.5 degrees. Just scan-
ning out a frame buffer to a display at 60 Hz requires
16.67 ms. It might be possible to build an HMD system
with less than 10 ms of lag, but the drastic cut in
throughput and the expense required to construct the
system would make alternate solutions attractive. Mini-
mizing system delay is important, but reducing delay to
the point where it is no longer a source of registration
error is not currently practical.
4.3.2 Reduce Apparent Lag. Image deflection is
a clever technique for reducing the amount of apparent
system delay for systems that only use head orientation
(Burbidge and Murray, 1989; Regan and Pose, 1994;
Riner and Browder, 1992; So and Griffin, 1992). It is a
way to incorporate more recent orientation measure-
ments into the late stages of the rendering pipeline.
Therefore, it is a feed-forward technique. The scene
generator renders an image much larger than needed to
fill the display. Then, just before scanout, the system
reads the most recent orientation report. The orienta-
tion value is used to select the fraction of the frame
buffer to send to the display, since small orientation
changes are equivalent to shifting the frame buffer out-
put horizontally and vertically.
Image deflection does not work on translation, but
image-warping techniques might (Chen and Williams,
1993; McMillan and Bishop, 1995a, b). After the scene
generator renders the image based upon the head tracker
reading, small adjustments in orientation and translation
could be done after rendering by warping the image.
These techniques assume knowledge of the depth at ev-
ery pixel, and the warp must be done much more
quickly than rerendering the entire image.
4.3.3 Match Temporal Streams. In video-
based AR systems, the video camera and digitization
hardware impose inherent delays on the user's view of
the real world. This delay is potentially a blessing when
reducing dynamic errors, because it allows the temporal
streams of the real and virtual images to be matched.
Additional delay is added to the video from the real
world to match the scene-generator delays in generating
the virtual images. This additional delay to the video
stream will probably not remain constant, since the
scene-generator delay will vary with the complexity of
the rendered scene. Therefore, the system must dynami-
cally synchronize the two streams.
Note that while this reduces conflicts between the real
and virtual, now both the real and virtual objects are de-
layed in time. While this may not be bothersome for
small delays, it is a major problem in the related area of
telepresence systems and will not be easy to overcome.
For long delays, this can produce negative effects such as
pilot-induced oscillation.
4.3.4 Predict. The last method is to predict the
future viewpoint and object locations. If the future loca-
tions are known, the scene can be rendered with these
future locations, rather than the measured locations.
Then when the scene finally appears, the viewpoints and
objects have moved to the predicted locations, and the
graphic images are correct at the time they are viewed.
For short system delays (under —80 ms), prediction has
been shown to reduce dynamic errors by up to an order
of magnitude (Azuma and Bishop, 1994). Accurate pre-
dictions require a system built for real-time measure-
ments and computation. Using inertial sensors makes
predictions more accurate by a factor of 2-3. Predictors
have been developed for a few AR systems (Emura and
Tachi, 1994; Zikan et al., 1994b), but the majority were
implemented and evaluated with VE systems, as shown
in the reference list of (Azuma and Bishop, 1994). More
work needs to be done on ways of comparing the theo-
retical performance of various predictors (Azuma, 1995;
Azuma and Bishop, 1995) and in developing prediction
models that better match actual head motion (Wu and
Ouhyoung, 1995).
4.4 Vision-based Techniques
Mike Bajura and Ulrich Neumann (Bajura and
Neumann, 1995) point out that registration based solely
on the information from the tracking system is like
building an "open-loop" controller. The system has no

Figure 18. A virtual amow and virtual chimney aligned with two real
objects. (Courtesy Mike Bajura, UNC Chapel Hill Dept. of Computer
Science, and Ulrich Neumann, USC)
feedback on how closely the real and virtual actually
match. Without feedback, it is difficult to build a system
that achieves perfect matches. However, video-based
approaches can use image processing or computer vision
techniques to aid registration. Since video-based AR sys-
tems have a digitized image of the real environment, it
may be possible to detect features in the environment
and use those to enforce registration. They call this a
"closed-loop" approach, since the digitized image pro-
vides a mechanism for bringing feedback into the sys-
tem.
Implementing this approach is not a trivial task. De-
tection and matching must run in real time and must be
robust. Special hardware and sensors are often required.
However, it is also not an "Al-complete" problem be-
cause this is simpler than the general computer-vision
problem.
For example, in some AR applications it is acceptable
to place fiducials in the environment. These fiducials
may be LEDs (Bajura and Neumann, 1995) or special
markers (Mellor, 1995a, b; Neumann and Cho, 1996).
Recent ultrasound experiments at UNC Chapel Hill
have used colored dots as fiducials (State et al., 1996a).
The locations or patterns of the fiducials are assumed to
be known. Image processing detects the locations of the
Azuma 373
Figure 19. Real skull with five fiducials. (Courtesyj. P. Mellor, MITAI
Lab.)
fiducials; then those are used to make corrections that
enforce proper registration.
These routines assume that one or more fiducials are
visible at all times; without them, the registration can fall
apart. But when the fiducials are visible, the results can
be accurate to one pixel—about as close as one can get
with video techniques. Figure 18, taken from (Bajura
and Neumann, 1995), shows a virtual arrow and a vir-
tual chimney exactly aligned with their desired points on
two real objects. The real objects each have an LED to
aid the registration. Figures 19 through 21 show regis-
tration from (Mellor, 1995a) that uses dots with a circu-
lar pattern as the fiducials. The registration is also nearly
perfect. Figure 22 demonstrates merging virtual objects
with the real environment, using colored dots as the fi-
ducials in a video-based approach. In the picture on the
left, the stack of cards in the center are real, but the ones
on the right are virtual. Notice that these penetrate one
374 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
Figure 20. Virtual wireframe skull registered with real skull. (Courtesy
J. P. Mellor, MIT AI Lab.)
of the blocks. In the image on the right, a virtual spiral
object interpenetrates the real blocks and table and also
casts virtual shadows upon the real objects (State et al.,
1996a).
Instead of fiducials, (Uenohara and Kanade, 1995)
uses template matching to achieve registration. Template
images of the real object are taken from a variety of view-
points. These are used to search the digitized image for
the real object. Once that is found, a virtual wireframe
can be superimposed on the real object.
Recent approaches in video-based matching avoid the
need for any calibration. (Kutukalos and Vallino, 1996)
represents virtual objects in a non-Euclidean, affine
frame of reference that allows rendering without knowl-
edge of camera parameters. (Iu and Rogovin, 1996) ex-
tracts contours from the video of the real world, then
uses an optimization technique to match the contours of
the rendered 3D virtual object with the contour ex-
tracted from the video. Note that calibration-free ap-
proaches may not recover all the information required to
Figure 21. Virtual wireframe skull registered with real skull moved to
adifferent position. (Courtesyj. P. Mellor, MITAI Lab.)
perform all potential AR tasks. For example, these two
approaches do not recover true depth information,
which is useful when compositing the real and the vir-
tual.
Techniques that use fiducials as the sole tracking
source determine the relative projective relationship be-
tween the objects in the environment and the video
camera. Athough this is enough to ensure registration,
it does not provide all the information one might need
in some AR applications, such as the absolute (rather
than relative) locations of the objects and the camera.
Absolute locations are needed to include virtual and real
objects that are not tracked by the video camera, such as
a 3D pointer or other virtual object not directly tied to
real objects in the scene.
Additional sensors besides video cameras can aid regis-
tration. Both (Mellor, 1995a, b) and (Grimson et al.,
1994, 1995) use a laser rangefinder to acquire an initial
depth map of the real object in the environment. Given a
matching virtual model, the system can match the depth

Figure 22. Virtual cards and spiral object merged with real blocks and table. (Courtesy Andrei State, UNC Chapel Hill Dept of Computer Science.)
maps from the real and virtual until they are properly
aligned, and that provides the information needed for
registration.
Another way to reduce the difficulty of the problem is
to accept the fact that the system may not be robust and
may not be able to perform all tasks automatically. Then
it can ask the user to perform certain tasks. The system
described in Sharma and Molineros (1994) expects
manual intervention when the vision algorithms fail to
identify a part because the view is obscured. The calibra-
tion techniques in Tuceryan et al. (1995) are heavily
based on computer vision techniques, but they ask the
user to manually intervene by specifying correspon-
dences when necessary.
4.5 Current Status
The registration requirements for AR are difficult
to satisfy, but a few systems have achieved good results.
(Azuma and Bishop, 1994) is an open-loop system that
shows registration typically within ± 5 millimeters from
many viewpoints for an object at about arm's length.
Closed-loop systems, however, have demonstrated
nearly perfect registration, accurate to within a pixel
(Bajura and Neumann, 1995; Mellor, 1995a, b; Neu-
mann and Cho, 1996; State et al., 1996a).
The registration problem is far from solved. Many
systems assume a static viewpoint, static objects, or even
Azuma 375
both. Even if the viewpoint or objects are allowed to
move, they are often restricted in how far they can travel.
Registration is shown under controlled circumstances,
often with only a small number of real-world objects, or
where the objects are already well-known to the system.
For example, registration may only work on one object
marked with fiducials, and not on any other objects in
the scene. Much more work needs to be done to in-
crease the domains in which registration is robust. Du-
plicating registration methods remains a nontrivial task,
due to both the complexity of the methods and the addi-
tional hardware required. If simple yet effective solutions
could be developed, that would speed the acceptance of
AR systems.
5 Sensing
Accurate registration and positioning of virtual
objects in the real environment requires accurate track-
ing of the user's head and sensing the locations of other
objects in the environment. The biggest single obstacle
to building effective augmented reality systems is the
requirement of accurate, long-range sensors and trackers
that report the locations of the user and the surrounding
objects in the environment. For details of tracking tech-
nologies, see the surveys in (Ferrin, 1991; Meyer et al.,
1992) and Chapter 5 of Durlach and Mavor (1995).
376 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
Commercial trackers are aimed at the needs of virtual
environments and motion-capture applications. Com-
pared to those two applications, augmented reality has
much stricter accuracy requirements and demands larger
working volumes. No tracker currently provides high
accuracy at long ranges in real time. More work needs to
be done to develop sensors and trackers that can meet
these stringent requirements.
Specifically, AR demands more from trackers and sen-
sors in three areas:
•
Greater input variety and bandwidth
•
Higher accuracy
•
Longer range
5.1 Input Variety and Bandwidth
VE systems are primarily built to handle output
bandwidth, example, the images displayed and
for
sounds generated. The input bandwidth is tiny—for ex-
ample, the locations of the user's head and hands, the
outputs from the buttons and other control devices. AR
systems, however, will need a greater variety of input
sensors and much more input bandwidth (Buxton, per-
sonal communication, MIT Workshop on Ubiquitous
Computing, Cambridge, MA, 1993). There are a
greater variety of possible input sensors than output dis-
plays. Outputs are limited to the five human senses. In-
puts can come from anything a sensor can detect. Robi-
nett speculates that augmented reality may be useful in
any application that requires displaying information not
directly available or detectable by human senses by mak-
ing that information visible (or audible, touchable, etc.)
(Robinett, 1992). Recall that the proposed medical ap-
plications in Section 2.1 use CT, MRI, and ultrasound
sensors as inputs. Other future applications might use
sensors to extend the user's visual range into infrared or
ultraviolet frequencies, and remote sensors would let
users view objects hidden by walls or hills. Conceptually,
anything not detectable by human senses but detectable
by machines might be transduced into something that a
user can sense in an AR system.
Range data is a particular input that is vital for many
AR applications (Aiaga, 1997; Breen and Rose, 1996).
The AR system knows the distance to the virtual objects,
because that model is built into the system. But the AR
system may not know where all the real objects are in the
environment. The system might assume that the entire
environment is measured at the beginning and remains
static thereafter. However, some useful applications will
require a dynamic environment, in which real objects
move, so the objects must be tracked in real time. How-
ever, for some applications a depth map of the real envi-
ronment would be sufficient. That would allow real ob-
jects to occlude virtual objects through a pixel-by-pixel
depth value comparison. Acquiring this depth map in
real time is not trivial. Sensors like laser rangefinders
might be used. Many computer-vision techniques for
recovering shape through various strategies (e.g., "shape
from stereo," or "shape from shading") have been tried.
A recent work (Wloka and Anderson, 1995) uses inten-
sity-based matching from a pair of stereo images to do
depth recovery. Recovering depth through existing vi-
sion techniques is difficult to do robustly in real time.
Finally, some annotation applications require access to
a detailed database of the environment; this database is a
type of input to the system. For example, the architec-
tural application of "seeing into the walls" assumes that
the system has a database describing where all the pipes,
wires, and other hidden objects are within the building.
Such a database may not be readily available, and even if
it is, it may not be in a format that is easily usable. For
example, the data may not be grouped to segregate the
parts of the model that represent wires from the parts
that represent pipes. Thus, a significant modeling effort
may be required and should be taken into consideration
when building an AR application.
5.2
High Accuracy
The accuracy requirements for the trackers and
sensors are driven by the accuracies needed for visual
registration, as described in Section 4. For many ap-
proaches, the registration is only as accurate as the
tracker. Therefore, the AR system needs trackers that are
accurate to around one millimeter and a tiny fraction of
a degree, across the entire working range of the tracker.
Few trackers can meet this specification, and every

technology has weaknesses. Some mechanical trackers
are accurate enough, although they tether the user to a
limited working volume. Magnetic trackers are vulner-
able to distortion by metal that exists in many desired
AR application environments. Ultrasonic trackers suffer
from noise and are difficult to make accurate at long
ranges because of variations in the ambient temperature.
Optical technologies (Janin et al., 1994) have distortion
and calibration problems. Inertial trackers drift with
time. Of the individual technologies, optical technolo-
gies show the most promise because of trends toward
high-resolution digital cameras, real-time photogram-
metric techniques, and structured light sources that re-
sult in more signal strength at long distances. Future
tracking systems that can meet the stringent require-
ments of AR will probably be hybrid systems (Azuma,
1993; Durlach and Mavor, 1995; Foxlin, 1996; Zikan et
al., 1994b), such as a combination of inertial and optical
technologies. Using multiple technologies opens the
possibility of covering for each technology's weaknesses
by combining their strengths.
Attempts have been made to calibrate the distortions
in commonly used magnetic tracking systems (Bryson,
1992; Ghazisaedy et al., 1995). These have succeeded at
removing much of the gross error from the tracker at
long ranges, but not to the level required by AR systems
(Holloway, 1995). For example, mean errors at long
ranges can be reduced from several inches to around
inch.
The requirements for registering other sensor modes
are not nearly as stringent. For example, the human au-
ditory system is not very good at localizing deep bass
sounds. For this reason subwoofer placement is not criti-
cal in a home-theater system.
5.3
Long Range
Few trackers are built for accuracy at long ranges,
since most VE applications do not require long ranges.
Motion capture applications track an actor's body parts
to control a computer-animated character or for the
analysis of an actor's movements. This approach is fine
for position recovery, but not for orientation. Orienta-
tion recovery is based upon computed positions. Even
Azuma 377
tiny errors in those positions can cause orientation errors
of a few degrees, a variation that is too large for AR sys-
tems.
Two scalable tracking systems for HMDs have been
described in the literature (Ward et al., 1992; Sowizral
and Barnes, 1993). A scalable system is one that can be
expanded to cover any desired range, simply by adding
more modular components to the system. This type of
system is created by building a cellular tracking system in
which only nearby sources and sensors are used to track
a user. As the user walks around, the set of sources and
sensors changes, thus achieving large working volumes
while avoiding long distances between the current work-
ing set of sources and sensors. While scalable trackers can
be effective, they are complex and by their very nature
have many components, making them relatively expen-
sive to construct.
The Global Positioning System (GPS) is used to track
the locations of vehicles almost anywhere on the planet.
It might be useful as one part of a long range tracker for
AR systems. However, by itself it will not be sufficient.
The best reported accuracy is approximately one centi-
meter, assuming that many measurements are integrated
(so that accuracy is not generated in real time), when
GPS is run in differential mode. That is not sufficiently
accurate to recover orientation from a set of positions on
a user.
one Tracking an AR system outdoors in real time with the
required accuracy has not been demonstrated and re-
mains an open problem.
6 Future Directions
This section identifies areas and approaches that
require further research to produce improved AR sys-
tems.
6.1 Hybrid Approaches
Future tracking systems may be hybrids, because
combined approaches can cover weaknesses. The same
may be true for other problems in AR. For example, cur-
rent registration strategies generally focus on a single
378 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
strategy. Future systems may be more robust if several
techniques are combined. An example is combining vi-
sion-based techniques with prediction: If the fiducials
are not available, the system switches to open-loop pre-
diction to reduce the registration errors, rather than
breaking down completely. The predicted viewpoints in
turn produce a more accurate initial location estimate for
the vision-based techniques.
6.2 Real-Time Systems and
Time-Critical Computing
Many VE systems are not truly run in real time.
Instead, it is common to build the system, often on
UNIX, and then see how fast it runs. This approach may
be sufficient for some VE applications; since everything
is virtual, all the objects are automatically synchronized
with each other. AR is a different story. Now the virtual
and real must be synchronized, and the real world
"runs" in real time. Therefore, effective AR systems
must be built with real-time performance in mind. Accu-
rate timestamps must be available. Operating systems
must not arbitrarily swap out the AR software process at
any time, for arbitrary durations. Systems must be built
to guarantee completion within specified time budgets,
rather than just "running as quickly as possible." These
are characteristics of
flight simulators and a few VE sys-
tems (Krueger, 1992). Constructing and debugging
real-time systems is often painful and difficult, but the
requirements for AR demand real-time performance.
6.3 Perceptual and
Psychophysical Studies
Augmented reality is an area ripe for psychophysi-
cal studies. How much lag can a user detect? How much
registration error is detectable when the head is moving?
Besides questions on perception, psychological experi-
ments that explore performance issues are also needed.
How much does head-motion prediction improve user
performance on a specific task? How much registration
error is tolerable for a specific application before perfor-
mance on that task degrades substantially? Is the allow-
able error larger while the user moves her head versus
when she stands still? Furthermore, not much is known
about potential optical illusions caused by errors or con-
flicts in the simultaneous display of real and virtual ob-
jects (Durlach and Mavor, 1995).
Few experiments in this area have been performed.
Jannick Rolland, Frank Biocca, and their students con-
ducted a study of the effect caused by eye displacements
in video see-through HMDs (Rolland et al., 1995).
They found that users partially adapted to the eye dis-
placement, but they also had negative aftereffects after
removing the HMD. Steve Ellis's group at NASA Ames
has conducted work on perceived depth in a see-through
HMD (Ellis and Bücher, 1994; Ellis and Menges,
1995). ATR (Advanced Telecommunications Research)
has also conducted a study (Utsumi et al., 1994).
6.4 Portability
explained why some potential AR ap-
Section 3.4
plications require giving the user the ability to walk
around large environments, even outdoors. For this rea-
son the equipment must be self-contained and portable.
Existing tracking technology is not capable of tracking a
user outdoors at the required accuracy.
6.5 Multimodal Displays
Amost all work in AR has focused on the visual
sense: virtual graphic objects and overlays. But, as Sec-
tion 3.1 explained, that augmentation might apply to all
other senses as well. In particular, adding and removing
3D sound is a capability that could be useful in some AR
applications.
6.6 Social and Political Issues
Technological issues are not the only ones that
need to be considered when building a real application.
There are also social and political dimensions when get-
ting new technologies into the hands of real users.
Sometimes, perception is what counts, even if the tech-
nological reality is different. For example, if workers per-
ceive lasers to be a health risk, they may refuse to use a
system with lasers in the display or in the trackers, even if

those lasers are eye safe.
Ergonomics and ease of use are
paramount considerations. Whether AR is truly a cost-
effective solution in its proposed applications has yet to
be determined. Another important factor is whether or
not the technology is perceived as a threat to jobs and as
a replacement for workers, especially now that many cor-
porations have downsized. AR may be positively per-
ceived in this regard, because it is intended as a tool to
make the user's job easier, rather than something that
completely replaces the human worker. Athough tech-
nology transfer is not normally a subject of academic
papers, it is a real problem. Social and political concerns
should not be ignored during attempts to move AR out
of the research lab and into the hands of real users.
7 Conclusion
Augmented reality is far behind virtual environ-
ments in maturity. Several commercial vendors sell com-
plete, turnkey virtual environment systems. However, no
commercial vendor currently sells an HMD-based aug-
mented reality system. A few monitor-based "virtual
set" systems are available, but today AR systems are pri-
marily found in academic and industrial research labora-
tories.
The first deployed HMD-based AR systems will prob-
ably be in the application of aircraft manufacturing. Both
Boeing (Boeing TRP, 1994; ARPA, 1995) and McDon-
nell Douglas (Neumann and Cho, 1996) are exploring
this technology. The former uses optical approaches,
while the latter is pursuing video approaches. Boeing has
performed trial runs with workers using a prototype sys-
tem but has not yet made any deployment decisions.
Annotation and visualization applications in restricted,
limited-range environments are déployable today, al-
though much more work needs to be done to make
them cost effective and flexible. Applications in medical
visualization will take longer. Prototype visualization
aids have been used on an experimental basis, but the
stringent registration requirements and ramifications of
mistakes will postpone common usage for many years.
AR will probably be used for medical training before it is
commonly used in surgery.
Azuma 379
The next generation of combat aircraft will have hel-
met-mounted sights, with graphics registered to targets
in the environment (Wanstall, 1989). These displays,
combined with short-range steerable missiles that can
shoot at targets off-boresight, give a tremendous combat
advantage to pilots in dogfights. Instead of having to be
directly behind his target in order to shoot at it, a pilot
can now shoot at anything within a 60-90° cone of his
aircraft's forward centerline. Russia and Israel currently
have systems with this capability, and the United States is
expected to field the AIM-9X missile with its associated
Helmet-Mounted Sight in 2002 (Dornheim and
Hughes, 1995; Dornheim, 1995a). Registration errors
due to delays are a major problem in this application
(Dornheim, 1995b).
Augmented reality is a relatively new field. Most of the
research efforts have occurred in the past four years, as
shown by the references listed at the end of this paper.
The SIGGRAPH "Rediscovering Our Fire" report iden-
tified augmented reality as one of four areas where SIG-
GRAPH should encourage more submissions (Mair,
1994). Because of the numerous challenges and unex-
plored avenues in this area, AR will remain a vibrant area
of research for at least the next several years.
One area where a breakthrough is required is tracking
an HMD outdoors at the accuracy required by AR. If
this is accomplished, several interesting applications will
become possible. Two examples are described here: navi-
gation maps and visualization of past and future environ-
ments.
The first application is a navigation aid to people walk-
ing outdoors. These individuals could be soldiers ad-
vancing upon their objective, hikers lost in the woods, or
tourists seeking directions to their intended destination.
Today, these individuals must pull out a physical map
and associate what they see in the real environment
around them with the markings on the 2D map. If land-
marks are not easily identifiable, this association can be
difficult to perform, as anyone lost in the woods can at-
test. An AR system makes navigation easier by perform-
ing the association step automatically. If the user's posi-
tion and orientation are known, and the AR system has
access to a digital map of the area, then the AR system
can draw the map in 3D directly upon the user's view.
380 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
The user looks at a nearby mountain and sees graphics
directly overlaid on the real environment explaining the
mountain's name, how tall it is, how far away it is, and
where the trail is that leads to the top.
The second application is visualization of locations
and events as they were in the past or as they will be after
future changes are performed. Tourists that visit histori-
cal sites, such as a Civil War battlefield or the Acropolis
in Athens, Greece, do not see these locations as they
were in the past, due to changes over time. It is often
difficult for a modern visitor to imagine what these sites
really looked like in the past. To help, some historical
sites stage "living history" events where volunteers wear
ancient clothes and reenact historical events. A tourist
equipped with an outdoors AR system could see a com-
puter-generated version of the living history. The HMD
could cover up modern buildings and monuments in the
background and show, directly on the grounds at Get-
tysburg, where the Union and Confederate troops were
at the fateful moment of Pickett's charge. The gutted
interior of the modern Parthenon could be filled in by
computer-generated representations of what it looked
like in 430 B.C. including the long-vanished gold statue
of Athena in the middle. Tourists and students walking
around the grounds with such AR displays would gain a
much better understanding of these historical sites and
the important events that took place there. Similarly, AR
displays could show what proposed architectural changes
would look like before they were carried out. An urban
designer could show clients and politicians what a new
stadium would look like as they walked around the ad-
joining neighborhood, to better understand how the
stadium project would affect nearby residents.
After the basic problems with AR are solved, the ulti-
mate goal will be to generate virtual objects that are so
realistic that they are virtually indistinguishable from the
real environment. Photorealism has been demonstrated
in feature films, but accomplishing this in an interactive
application will be much harder. Lighting conditions,
surface reflections, and other properties must be mea-
sured automatically, in real time. More sophisticated
lighting, texturing, and shading capabilities must run at
interactive rates in future scene generators. Registration
must benearly perfect, without manual intervention or
adjustments. While these are difficult problems, they are
probably not insurmountable. It took about 25 years to
progress from drawing stick figures on a screen to the
photorealistic dinosaurs in "Jurassic Park." Within an-
other 25 years, we should be able to wear a pair of AR
glasses outdoors to see and interact with photorealistic
dinosaurs eating a tree in our backyard.
Acknowledgments
This paper is an updated version of my course notes for an
ACM SIGGRAPH '95 class called "Developing Advanced Vir-
tual Reality Applications," given in Los Angeles, CA, in Au-
gust 1995.
I thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criti-
cism and suggestions for improving this paper. I also thank the
following individuals and organizations for sending pictures to
include with this paper: Mike Bajura, Andrei State, and Linda
Houseman, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill De-
partment of Computer Science; David Drascic and Paul Mil-
gram, University of Toronto; Steve Feiner and Blair Macln-
tyre, Columbia University; Alessandro Giacalone, The
European Computer-Industry Research Centre (ECRC) and
David Breen, Caltech; J. P. Mellor, MIT AI Laboratory; David
Mizell, Boeing; Ulrich Neumann, University of Southern Cali-
fornia; fannick Rolland, Center for Research and Engineering
in Optics and Lasers (CREOL) at the University of Central
Florida (rolland@creol.ucf.edu).
References
Note: Some of these references are available electronically at
the following sites on the World Wide Web:
Columbia U. http://www.cs.columbia.edu/graphics/
ECRC http://www.ecrc.de/
MIT AI Lab http://www.ai.mit.edu/
UNC Chapel Hill http://www.cs.unc.edu/
U. Toronto http://vered.rose.utoronto.ca/etc-lab.html/
Aliaga, D. G. ( 1997). Virtual objects in the real world. Com-
munications of the ACM 40, 3 (49-54).
ARGOS virtual pointer camera calibration procedure WWW

page. (1994). http://vered.rose.utoronto.ca/people/dav-
id_dir/POINTER/Calibration.html.
ARPA ESTO WWW page. (1995). http://molothrus.sysplan-
.com/ESTO/
Azuma, R. (1993). Tracking requirements for augmented real- Burbidge, D., & Murray, P. M. (1989). Hardware improve-
ity. Communications of the ACM, 36 (7), 50-51.
Azuma, R T. (1995). Predictive tracking for augmented real-
ity. Ph.D. of
dissertation, Dept. Computer Science, Univer-
sity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Available as UNC-CH
CS Dept. Technical Report TR95-007.
Azuma, R., & Bishop, G. (1994). Improving static and dy-
namic registration in a see-through HMD. Computer Graph-
ics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '94), Orlando, 197-204.
Azuma, R, & Bishop, G. (1995). A frequency-domain analysis
of head-motion prediction. Computer Graphics (Proceedings
of SIGGRAPH '95), Los Angeles, 401-408.
Barfield, W, Rosenberg, C, and Lötens, W. A. (1995). Aug-
mented-reality displays. In W. Barfield, & Furness, T. A., Ill
(Eds.). Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface De-
sign (542-575). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bajura, M. (1993). Camera calibration for video see-through
head-mounted display. Technical Report TR93-048. Dept. of
Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill.
Bajura, M., & Neumann, U. (1995). Dynamic registration
correction in video-based augmented reality systems. IEEE
Computer Graphics and Applications, 15(5), 52-60.
Bajura, M., Fuchs, H., & Ohbuchi, R. (1992). Merging virtual Dornheim, M. A. (1995b). Helmet-mounted sights must over-
reality with the real world: Seeing ultrasound imagery within
the patient. Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH
'92), 26(2), 203-210.
Betting, F., Feldmar, J., Ayache, N., & Devernay, F. (1995). A
new framework for fusing stereo images with volumetric
medical images. Proceedings of Computer Vision, Virtual Re-
ality, and Robotics in Medicine '95, Nice, 30-39.
Boeing TRP WWW page. (1994). http://esto.sysplan.com/
ESTO/Displays/HMD-TDS/Factsheets/Boeing.html.
Bowskill, J., & Downie, J. (1995). Extending the capabilities
of the human visual system: An introduction to enhanced
reality. Computer Graphics, 29(2), 61-65.
Breen, D. E., Whitaker, R. T., Rose, E., & Tuceryan, M.
(1996). Interactive occlusion and automatic object place-
ment for augmented reality. Proceedings of Eurographics '96,
Futuroscope-Poitiers, 11-22.
F. Jr.
Brooks, P., (1996). The computer scientist as toolsmith
II. Communications of the ACM, 39(3), 61-68.
Azuma 381
Bryson, S. (1992). Measurement and calibration of static dis-
tortion of position data from 3D trackers. SPIE Proceedings
Vol. 1669: Stereoscopic Displays and Applications III, San
Jose, 244-255.
ments to the helmet-mounted projector on the Visual Dis-
play Research Tool (VDRT) at the Naval Training Systems
Center. SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1116: Head-Mounted Displays,
52-59.
Caudell, T. P. (1994). Introduction to Augmented Reality.
SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2351: Telemanipulator and Telepres-
ence Technologies, Boston, 272-281.
Caudell, T P., & Mizell, D. W. (1992). Augmented reality: An
application of heads-up display technology to manual manu-
facturing processes. Proceedings of the Hawaii International
Conference on System Sciences, 659-669.
Chen, S. E., & Williams, L. (1993). View interpolation for im-
age synthesis. Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIG-
GRAPH '93), Anaheim, 279-288.
Deering, M. (1992). High-resolution virtual reality. Computer
Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '92), 26 (2), Chicago,
195-202.
Doenges, P. K. (1985). Overview of computer image genera-
tion in visual simulation. Course Notes, 14: ACM SIG-
GRAPH 1985, San Francisco.
Dornheim, M. A. (1995a). U.S. fighters to get helmet displays
after 2000. Aviation Week and Space Technology, 143(17),
46-18.
come delays. Aviation Week and Space Technology, 143 (17),
54.
Dornheim, M. A., & Hughes, D. (1995). U.S. intensifies ef-
forts to meet missile threat. Aviation Week and Space Tech-
nology, 143 (16), 36-39.
Drascic, D. (1993). Stereoscopic vision and augmented reality.
Scientific Computing and Automation, 9(7), 31-34.
Drascic, D., & Milgram, P. (1991 ). Positioning accuracy of a
virtual stereographic pointer in a real stereoscopic video
world. SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1457: Stereoscopic Displays and
Applications II, San lose, 302-313.
Drascic, D., Grodski, J. J., Milgram, P., Ruffo, K., Wong, P., &
Zhai, S. (1993). ARGOS: A display system for augmenting
reality. Video Proceedings of the International Conference on
Computer-Human Interaction '93: Human Factors in Com-
puting Systems. Also in A CM SIGGRAPH Technical Video
Review, 88. Extended abstract in Proceedings of INTERCHI
'93,521.
382 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4

Durlach, N. I., & Mavor, A. S. (Eds.) ( 1995). Virtual reality: Foley, L D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S. K, & Hughes, ]. F.
Scientific and technological challenges. Washington DC: Na- (1990). Computergraphics: Principles and practice (2nd
tional Academy Press. ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Edwards, E., Rolland, J., Keller, (1993).
& K. Video see- Foxlin, E. ( 1996). Inertial head-tracker sensor fusion by a
through design merging
for of real and virtual environ- complementary separate-bias Kaiman Filter. Proceedings of
ments. Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual In- the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '96,
ternational Symposium '93, Seattle, 222-233. Santa Clara, 185-194.
Edwards, P. J., Hill, D. L. G., Hawkes, D. J., Spink, R, Col- Ghazisaedy, M., Adamczyk, D., Sandin, D. J., Kenyon, R. V,
chester, A. C. F., Strong, A., & Gleeson, M. (1995). Neuro- & DeFanti, T A. (1995). Ultrasonic calibration of a mag-
surgical guidance using the stereo microscope. Proceedings of netic tracker in a virtual reality space. Proceedings of the IEEE
Computer Vision, Virtual Reality, and Robotics in Medicine Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95, Re-
'95, Nice, 555-564. search Triangle Park, 179-188.
Ellis, S. R, & Bucher, U. I. (1994). Distance perception of Crimson, W, Lozano-Pérez, T., Wells, W., Ettinger, G.,
stereoscopically presented virtual objects optically superim- White, S., & Kikinis, R. (1994). An automatic registration
posed physical objects by
on a head-mounted see-through method for frameless stereotaxy, image guided surgery, and
display. Proceedings of 38th Annual Meeting of the Human enhanced reality visualization. Proceedings of the IEEE Con-
Factors and Ergonomics Society, Nashville, 1300-1305. ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Los
Ellis, S. R, & Menges, B. M. (1995). ludged distance to vir- Alamitos, 430-436.
tual objects in the near visual field. Proceedings of 39th An- Grimson, W. E. L., Ettinger, G. I., White, S. I., Gleason, P. L.,
nual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Lozano-Pérez, T., Wells, W. M. Ill, & Kikinis, R (1995).
San Diego, 1400-1404. Evaluating and validating an automated registration system
Emura, S., & Tachi, S. (1994). Compensation of time lag be- for enhanced reality visualization in surgery. Proceedings of
tween actual and virtual spaces by multi-sensor integration. Computer Vision, Virtual Reality, and Robotics in Medicine
Proceedings of 1994 IEEE
the International Conference on '95, Nice, 3-12.
Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, Holloway, R. (1995). Registration errors in augmented reality.
Las Vegas, 463—169. Ph.D. dissertation. Dept. of Computer Science, University
Feiner, (1994a). Augmented reality.
S. Course Notes, 2: ACM of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Available as UNC-CH CS
SIGGRAPH 1994, 7,1-11. Dept. Technical Report TR95-016.
Feiner, S. (1994b). Redefining the user interface: Augmented Holmgren, D. E. (1992). Design and construction of a 30-de-
reality. Course Notes, 2: ACM SIGGRAPH 1994, 18, 1-7. gree see-through head-mounted display. Technical Report
Feiner, S., Maclntyre, B., & Seligmann, D. (1993a). Knowl- TR92-030. Dept. of Computer Science, University of North
edge-based augmented reality. Communications of the ACM, Carolina at Chapel Hill.
36(7), 52-62. Iu, S.-L., & Rogovin, K. W. (1996). Registering perspective
Feiner, S., Maclntyre, B., Haupt, M., & Solomon, E. (1993b). contours with 3D objects without correspondence using
Windows on the world: 2D windows for 3D augmented re- orthogonal polynomials. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality
ality. Proceedings of 1993 User Interface Software and
the Annual International Symposium '96, Santa Clara, 37—14.
Technology, Atlanta, 145-155. Iain, A. K. (1989). Fundamentals of digital image processing.
Feiner, K., Webster,
S. A. C, Krueger, T. E. Ill, Maclntyre, B., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
& Keller, E. J. (1995). Architectural Anatomy. Presence: Janin, A. L., Mizell, D. W., & Caudell, T. P. (1993). Calibra-
Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(3), 318-325. tion of head-mounted displays for augmented reality appli-
Ferrin, F. }. (1991). Survey of helmet tracking technologies. cations. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual Interna-
SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1456: Large-Screen Projection, Avionic, tional Symposium '93, Seattle, 246-255.
and Helmet-Mounted Displays, 86-94. Janin, A., Zikan, K., Mizell, D., Banner, M., & Sowizral, H.
Fitzmaurice, G. (1993). Situated information spaces: Spatially ( 1994). A videometric head tracker for augmented reality.
aware palmtop computers. Communications of the ACM, 36 SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2351: Telemanipulator and Telepres-
(7), 38-49. ence Technologies, Boston, 308-315.

Ranchería, A. R, Rolland, J. P., Wright, D. L., & Burdea, G.
(1995). A novel virtual reality tool for teaching dynamic 3D
anatomy. Proceedings of Computer Vision, Virtual Reality,
and Robotics in Medicine '95, Nice, 163-169.
Kim, W. S. (1993). Advanced teleoperation, graphics aids, and
application to time delay environments. Proceedings of the
First Industrial Virtual Reality Show and Conference, Maku-
hari Meese, 202-207.
Kim, W. S. (1996). Virtual reality calibration and preview/
Predictive displays for telerobotics. Presence: Teleoperators
and Virtual Environments, 5(2), 173-190.
Krueger, M. W. (1992). Simulation versus artificial reality. Pro-
ceedings ofIMAGE VI Conference, Scottsdale, 147-155.
Kutulakos, K N., & Vallino, J. (1996). Affine object represen-
tations for calibration-free augmented reality. Proceedings of
the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '96,
Santa Clara, CA, 25-36.
Lenz, R. K, & Tsai, R. Y. (1988). Techniques for calibration
of the scale factor and image center for high accuracy 3D
machine vision metrology. IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 10 (5), 713-720.
Lion, D., Rosenberg, C, & Barfield, W (1993). Overlaying
three-dimensional computer graphics with stereoscopic live
motion video: Applications for virtual environments. Society
for Information Display International Symposium Digest of
Technical Papers, Seattle, 483—486.
Lorensen, W., Cline, H., Nafis, C, Kikinis, R, Altobelli, D., &
Gleason, L. (1993). Enhancing reality in the operating
room. Proceedings of Visualization '93, Los Alamitos, 410-
415.
Maes, P. (1995). Artificial life meets entertainment: Lifelike
autonomous agents. Communications of the ACM, 38(11),
108-114.
Mair, S. G. (1994). Preliminary Report on SIGGRAPH in the
21st Century: Rediscovering Our Fire. Computer Graphics,
28 (4), 288-296.
McMillan, L., & Bishop, G. (1995a). Head-tracked stereo-
scopic display using image warping. SPIE Proceedings 2409:
Electronic Imaging Science and Technology, San lose, 21-30.
McMillan, L., & Bishop, G. (1995b). Plenoptic modeling.
Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '95), Los
Angeles, 39-46.
Mellor, J. P. ( 1995a). Enhanced reality visualization in a surgi-
cal environment. Master's thesis, Dept. of Electrical Engi-
neering, MIT.
Mellor, I. P. (1995b). Realtime camera calibration for en-
hanced reality visualization. Proceedings of Computer Vision,
Azuma 383
Virtual Reality, and Robotics in Medicine '95, Nice, 471-
475.
Meyer, K, Applewhite, H. L., & Biocca, F. A. (1992). A sur-
vey of position-trackers. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual
Environments, 1 (2), 173-200.
Milgram, P., Zhai, S., Drascic, D., & Grodski, J. J. (1993).
Applications of augmented reality for human-robot commu-
nication. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelli-
gent Robotics and Systems, Yokohama, 1467-1472.
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994a). A taxonomy of mixed re-
ality virtual displays. Institute of Electronics, Information,
and Communication Engineers Transactions on Information
and Systems, E77-D(9) 1321-1329.
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F.
(1994b). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the real-
ity-virtuality continuum. SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2351: Tele-
manipulator and Telepresence Technologies, Boston, 282-
292.
Milgram, P., Drascic, D., Grodski, J. J., Restogi, A., Zhai, S.,
& Zhou, C. (1995). Merging real and virtual worlds. Pro-
ceedings of IMAGINA '95, Monte Carlo, 218-230.
Mine, M. R. (1993). Characterization of end-to-end delays in
head-mounted display systems. Technical Report TR93-001.
Dept. of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill.
Neumann, U., & Cho, Y. (1996). A self-tracking augmented
reality system. Proceedings of Virtual Reality Software and
Technology '96, Hong Kong, 109-115.
Oishi, T., & Tachi, S. (1996). Methods to calibrate projection
transformation parameters for see-through head-mounted
displays. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5
(1), 122-135.
Olano, M., Cohen, J., Mine, M., & Bishop, G. (1995). Com-
bating graphics system latency. Proceedings of 1995 Sympo-
sium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Monterey, 19-24.
Oyama, E., Tsunemoto, N., Tachi, S., & Inoue, Y. (1993).
Experimental study on remote manipulation using virtual
reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2
(2), 112-124.
Pausch, R., Crea, T., & Conway, M. ( 1992). A literature sur-
vey for virtual environments: Military flight simulator visual
systems and simulator sickness. Presence: Teleoperators and
Virtual Environments, 1 (3), 344-363.
Peuchot, B., Tanguy, A., & Eude, M. (1995). Virtual reality as
an operative tool during scoliosis surgery. Proceedings of
Computer Vision, Virtual Reality, and Robotics in Medicine
'95, Nice, 549-554.
384 PRESENCE: VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4
Regan, M., & Pose, R. ( 1994). Priority rendering with a vir-
tual reality address recalculation pipeline. Computer Graphics
(Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '94), Orlando, 155-162.
Rekimoto, }. (1995). The magnifying glass approach to aug-
mented reality systems. Proceedings oflCAT '95, Makuhari
Meese.
Rekimoto, J., & Nagao, K. (1995). The world through the
computer: Computer augmented interaction with real world
environments. Proceedings of the 1995 User Interface Soft-
ware Technology, Pittsburgh, 29-36.
Riner, B., & Browder, B. ( 1992). Design guidelines for a car-
rier-based training system. Proceedings of IMAGE VI,
Scottsdale, 65-73.
Robinett, W. (1992). Synthetic experience: A proposed tax-
onomy. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1
(2), 229-247.
Robinett, W., & Rolland, J. (1992). A computational model
for the stereoscopic optics of a head-mounted display. Pres-
ence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1 (1), 45-62.
Rolland, J. P., & Hopkins, T. (1993). A method of computa-
tional correction for optical distortion in head-mounted dis-
plays. Technical Report TR93-045. Dept. of Computer Sci-
ence, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Rolland, I., Holloway, R, & Fuchs, H. (1994). A comparison
of optical and video see-through head-mounted displays.
SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2351: Telemanipulator and Telepres-
ence Technologies, Boston, 293-307.
Rolland, I., Biocca, F., Barlow, T, & Ranchería, A. ( 1995).
Quantification of adaptation to virtual-eye location in see-
thru head-mounted displays. Proceedings of the Virtual Real-
ity Annual International Symposium '95, Research Triangle
Park, NC, 56-66.
Rose, E., Breen, D., Ahlers, K, Crampton, C, Tuceryan, M.,
Whitaker, R, & Gréer, D. (1995). Annotating real-world
objects using augmented reality. Proceedings of Computer
Graphics International '95, Leeds, 357-370.
Rosen, ]. M., Soltanian, H., Redett, R. J., & Laub, D. R.
(1996). Evolution of virtual reality: From planning to per-
forming surgery. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology,
15(2), 16-22.
Sharma, R., & Molineros, I. (1994). Role of computer vision
in augmented virtual reality. SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2351:
Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, Boston, 220-
231.
Simon, D. A., Hebert, M., & Kanade, T. (1994). Techniques
for fast and accurate intra-surgical registration. Proceedings of
the First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and
Computer Assisted Surgery, 90-97'.
Sims, D. (1994). New realities in aircraft design and manufac-
ture. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 14 (2), 91.
So, R. H. Y., & Griffin, M. J. (1992). Compensating lags in
head-coupled displays using head position prediction and
image deflection. Journal of A ircraft, 29(6), 1064-1068.
Sowizral, H., & Barnes, ]. (1993). Tracking position and ori-
entation in a large volume. Proceedings of IEEE VRAIS '93,
Seattle, 132-139.
State, A., Chen, D. T, Tector, C, Brandt, A., Chen, H., Oh-
buchi, R, Bajura, M., & Fuchs, H. (1994). Case study: Ob-
serving a volume rendered fetus within a pregnant patient.
Proceedings of IEEE Visualization '94, Washington DC,
364-368.
State, A., Hirota, G., Chen, D. T., Garrett, B., & Livingston,
M. (1996a). Superior augmented reality registration by inte-
grating landmark tracking and magnetic tracking. Computer
Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '96), New Orleans,
429^38.
State, A., Livingston, M. A., Hirota, G., Garrett, W. F., Whit-
ton, M. C, Fuchs, H., & Pisano, E. D. (1996b). Techniques
for augmented-reality systems: Realizing ultrasound-guided
needle biopsies. Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIG-
GRAPH '96), New Orleans, 439-446.
Taubes, G. (1994). Surgery in cyberspace. Discover, 15(12),
84-94.
Tharp, G., Hayati, S., & Phan, L. (1994). Virtual window tele-
presence system for telerobotic inspection. SPIE Proceedings
Vol. 2351: Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies,
Boston, 366-373.
Tuceryan, M., Greer, D. S., Whitaker, R. T, Breen, D.,
Crampton, C, Rose, E., & Ahlers, K. H. (1995). Calibra-
tion requirements and procedures for augmented reality.
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics,
1 (3), 255-273.
Uenohara, M., & Kanade, T. (1995). Vision-based object reg-
istration for real-time image overlay. Proceedings of Computer
Vision, Virtual Reality, and Robotics in Medicine '95, Nice,
13-22.
Utsumi, A., Milgram, P., Takemura, H., & Kishino, F. (1994).
Effects of fuzziness in perception of stereoscopically pre-
sented virtual object location. SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2351:
Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, Boston, 337-
344.
Wanstall, B. (1989). HUD on the head for combat pilots. In-
teravia, 44 (April 1989), 334-338.
 Azuma 385

Ward, M., Azuma, R, Bennett, R., Gottschalk, S., & Fuchs, in augmented reality. Proceedings of 1995 Symposium on In-
H. (1992). A demonstrated optical tracker with scalable ork teractive 3D Graphics, Monterey, 5-12.
area for head-mounted display systems. Proceedings of 1992 Wu, I.-R, & Ouhyoung, M. (1995). A 3D tracking experi-
Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Cambridge, 43-52. ment on latency and its compensation methods in virtual

Watson, B., & Hodges, L. (1995). Using texture maps to cor- environments. Proceedings of the 1995 User Interface Soft-
rect for optical distortion in head-mounted displays. Proceed- ware and Technology, Pittsburgh, 41-49.

ings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium Yoo, T. S., & Olano, T. M. (1993). Instant Hole» (Windows
'95, Research Triangle Park, 172-178. onto reality). Technical Report TR93-027. Department of

Welch, R. B. (1978). Perceptual modification: Adapting to al- Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel
tered sensory environments. New York: Academic Press. Hill.
Wellner, P. (1993). Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk. Zikan, K, Curtis, W. D., Sowizral, H., & Janin, A. (1994a).
Communications of the ACM, 36 (7), 86-96. Fusion of absolute and incremental position and orientation
Whitaker, R T, Crampton, C, Breen, D. E., Tuceryan, M., & sensors. SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2351: Telemanipulator and

Rose, E. (1995). Object calibration for augmented reality. Telepresence Technologies, Boston, 316-327.
Proceedings of Eurographics '95, Maastricht, 15-27. Zikan, K, Curtis, W. D., Sowizral, H. A., & lanin, A. L.
Wloka, M. M. (1995). Lag in multiprocessor virtual reality. ( 1994b). A note on dynamics of human head motions and
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(1), 50- on predictive filtering of head-set orientations. SPIE Pro-

63. ceedings Vol. 2351: Telemanipulator and Telepresence Tech-

Wloka, M. M., & Anderson, B. G. (1995). Resolving occlusion nologies, Boston, 328-336.
This article has been cited by:

1. Manoela M. O. da Silva, João Marcelo X. N. Teixeira, Patrícia S. Cavalcante, Veronica Teichrieb. 2019. Perspectives on
how to evaluate augmented reality technology tools for education: a systematic review. Journal of the Brazilian Computer
Society 25:1. . [Crossref]
2. Ohchan Kwon, Ho Jung Hwang, Yunseong Ji, Ok Sung Jeon, Jeong Pil Kim, Chanmin Lee, Yong Gun Shul. 2019.
Transparent Bendable Secondary Zinc-Air Batteries by Controlled Void Ionic Separators. Scientific Reports 9:1. . [Crossref]
3. Lisa Anthony. 2019. Physical dimensions of children's touchscreen interactions: Lessons from five years of study on the
MTAGIC project. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 128, 1-16. [Crossref]
4. Hamiyet Bursali, Rabia Meryem Yilmaz. 2019. Effect of augmented reality applications on secondary school students'
reading comprehension and learning permanency. Computers in Human Behavior 95, 126-135. [Crossref]
5. Chao-Hung Wang, Ni-Hsin Tsai, Jun-Ming Lu, Mao-Jiun J. Wang. 2019. Usability evaluation of an instructional
application based on Google Glass for mobile phone disassembly tasks. Applied Ergonomics 77, 58-69. [Crossref]
6. Manjit Singh Sidhu. 2019. Evaluation Study Outcome of Augmented Reality Technology for Solving Engineering
Problems in UNITEN. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 15:2, 69-84.
[Crossref]
7. Xiuquan Qiao, Pei Ren, Schahram Dustdar, Ling Liu, Huadong Ma, Junliang Chen. 2019. Web AR: A Promising Future
for Mobile Augmented Reality—State of the Art, Challenges, and Insights. Proceedings of the IEEE 107:4, 651-666.
[Crossref]
8. Wulf Loh, Catrin Misselhorn. 2019. Augmented learning, smart glasses and knowing how. AI & SOCIETY 33. . [Crossref]
9. Vida Davidavičienė, Jurgita Raudeliūnienė, Rima Viršilaitė. 2019. USER EXPERIENCE EVALUATION AND
CREATIVITY STIMULATION WITH AUGMENTED REALITY MOBILE APPLICATIONS. Creativity Studies
12:1, 34-48. [Crossref]
10. Shoufeng Lan, Xueyue Zhang, Mohammad Taghinejad, Sean Rodrigues, Kyu-Tae Lee, Zhaocheng Liu, Wenshan Cai.
2019. Metasurfaces for Near-Eye Augmented Reality. ACS Photonics . [Crossref]
11. Eleonora Bottani, Giuseppe Vignali. 2019. Augmented reality technology in the manufacturing industry: A review of the
last decade. IISE Transactions 51:3, 284-310. [Crossref]
12. ShiLi Wei, ZiChao Fan, ZhengBo Zhu, DongLin Ma. 2019. Design of a head-up display based on freeform reflective
systems for automotive applications. Applied Optics 58:7, 1675. [Crossref]
13. Panayiotis Kyriakou, Sorin Hermon. 2019. Can I touch this? Using Natural Interaction in a Museum Augmented Reality
System. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 12, e00088. [Crossref]
14. Hui Xue, Puneet Sharma, Fridolin Wild. 2019. User Satisfaction in Augmented Reality-Based Training Using Microsoft
HoloLens. Computers 8:1, 9. [Crossref]
15. Alvaro Montero, Telmo Zarraonandia, Paloma Diaz, Ignacio Aedo. 2019. Designing and implementing interactive and
realistic augmented reality experiences. Universal Access in the Information Society 18:1, 49-61. [Crossref]
16. Ayse Taskiran. 2019. The effect of augmented reality games on English as foreign language motivation. E-Learning and
Digital Media 16:2, 122-135. [Crossref]
17. Sarah Fletcher, Teegan Johnson, Tobias Adlon, Jon Larreina, Patricia Casla, Laure Parigot, Pedro J. Alfaro, María del
Mar Otero. 2019. Adaptive Automation Assembly: Identifying System Requirements for Technical Efficiency and Worker
Satisfaction. Computers & Industrial Engineering . [Crossref]
18. Dai-In Danny Han, Timothy Jung, M. Claudia Tom Dieck. 2019. Translating Tourist Requirements into Mobile AR
Application Engineering Through QFD. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 8, 1-17. [Crossref]
19. Tom Williams, Matthew Bussing, Sebastian Cabrol, Elizabeth Boyle, Nhan Tran. Mixed Reality Deictic Gesture for
Multi-Modal Robot Communication 191-201. [Crossref]
20. Daniele Sportillo, Alexis Paljic, Luciano Ojeda. On-Road Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Training 182-190. [Crossref]
21. Oğuz Diker. 2019. Evaluating Troy Museum as Mixed Realıty Virtual Museum With Mıxed Visuality Method. Gastroia:
Journal of Gastronomy And Travel Research 3:1, 197-224. [Crossref]
22. Felix Bork, Leonard Stratmann, Stefan Enssle, Ulrich Eck, Nassir Navab, Jens Waschke, Daniela Kugelmann. 2019. The
Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross Anatomy. Anatomical
Sciences Education 20. . [Crossref]
23. Cagdas Erbas, Veysel Demirer. 2019. The effects of augmented reality on students' academic achievement and motivation
in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 1. . [Crossref]
24. Eleni A. Kyza, Yiannis Georgiou. 2019. Scaffolding augmented reality inquiry learning: the design and investigation of the
TraceReaders location-based, augmented reality platform. Interactive Learning Environments 27:2, 211-225. [Crossref]
25. Juan Garzón, Juan Pavón, Silvia Baldiris. 2019. Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational
settings. Virtual Reality 20. . [Crossref]
26. Cécile Chevalier, Chris Kiefer. What Does Augmented Reality Mean as a Medium of Expression for Computational
Artists?. Leonardo 0:ja, 1-9. [Abstract] [PDF]
27. Carlos Avilés-Cruz, Juan Villegas-Cortez. 2019. A smartphone-based augmented reality system for university students for
learning digital electronics. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 15. . [Crossref]
28. Paul D. Schlosser, Tobias Grundgeiger, Penelope M. Sanderson, Oliver Happel. 2019. An exploratory clinical evaluation
of a head-worn display based multiple-patient monitoring application: impact on supervising anesthesiologists’ situation
awareness. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6. . [Crossref]
29. Zeynep Gecu‐Parmaksiz, Omer Delialioglu. 2019. Augmented reality‐based virtual manipulatives versus physical
manipulatives for teaching geometric shapes to preschool children. British Journal of Educational Technology 5. . [Crossref]
30. Lisa Berkemeier, Benedikt Zobel, Sebastian Werning, Ingmar Ickerott, Oliver Thomas. 2019. Engineering of Augmented
Reality-Based Information Systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering 61:1, 67-89. [Crossref]
31. Alessandro Ceruti, Pier Marzocca, Alfredo Liverani, Cees Bil. 2019. Maintenance in Aeronautics in an Industry 4.0
Context: The Role of Augmented Reality and Additive Manufacturing. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
. [Crossref]
32. Chi-Hsuan Lin, Wei-Chuan Wang, Chun-Yung Liu, Po-Nien Pan, Hou-Ru Pan. 2019. Research into the E-Learning
Model of Agriculture Technology Companies: Analysis by Deep Learning. Agronomy 9:2, 83. [Crossref]
33. Keita Ichihashi, Kaori Fujinami. 2019. Estimating Visibility of Annotations for View Management in Spatial Augmented
Reality Based on Machine-Learning Techniques. Sensors 19:4, 939. [Crossref]
34. A Ismail, I Festiana, T I Hartini, Y Yusal, A Malik. 2019. Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding of electricity
using learning media-based augmented reality. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157, 032049. [Crossref]
35. Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Eliot H. Winer. 2019. Augmented reality via expert demonstration authoring (AREDA). Computers
in Industry 105, 61-79. [Crossref]
36. Yuh-Shihing Chang, You-Shyang Chen, Cheng-Wei Chiang. 2019. The differences in pleasing value and learning
performance among different groups using mobile augmented reality system for cultural environment learning. Multimedia
Tools and Applications 78:4, 4965-4986. [Crossref]
37. Ömer KOÇAK, Rabia Meryem YILMAZ, Sevda KÜÇÜK, Yüksel GÖKTAŞ. 2019. The Educational Potential of
Augmented Reality Technology: Experiences of Instructional Designers and Practitioners. Journal of Education and Future
:15, 17-36. [Crossref]
38. Fatima El Jamiy, Ronald Marsh. 2019. Survey on depth perception in head mounted displays: distance estimation in virtual
reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality. IET Image Processing . [Crossref]
39. Siok Yee Tan, Haslina Arshad, Azizi Abdullah. 2019. Distinctive accuracy measurement of binary descriptors in mobile
augmented reality. PLOS ONE 14:1, e0207191. [Crossref]
40. Yang Feng, Quan Xie. 2019. Ad Creativity via Augmented Reality Technology in Online Video Ads: the Differential Role
of Novelty, Message Usefulness, and Ad-Consumer Association. Journal of Promotion Management 3, 1-27. [Crossref]
41. Yang Feng, Quan Xie. 2019. Demystifying Novelty Effects: An Analysis of Consumer Responses to YouTube Videos
Featuring Augmented Reality Out-of-Home Advertising Campaigns. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising
40:1, 36-53. [Crossref]
42. N. Kulishova, N. Suchkova. Impact of the Textbooks’ Graphic Design on the Augmented Reality Applications Tracking
Ability 692-701. [Crossref]
43. Matthias Walter, Vanessa Seitz, Klaus Bengler. The Virtual Penetrating the Physical and the Implication for Augmented
Reality Head-Up Displays 3-10. [Crossref]
44. Philipp K. Masur. Overall Conclusion and Outlook 331-345. [Crossref]
45. N. Tugbagul Altan Akin, Mehmet Gokturk. Comparison of Theory of Mind Tests in Augmented Reality and 2D
Environments for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders 257-264. [Crossref]
46. Ishan R. Dave, Vikas Chaudhary, Kishor P. Upla. Simulation of Analytical Chemistry Experiments on Augmented Reality
Platform 393-403. [Crossref]
47. Miho Nishizaki. Visualization of Infants’ Behavior at Home Using Augmented Reality for Promotion of Development and
Prevention of Accidents 930-941. [Crossref]
48. Matthias Neges, Mario Wolf, Robert Kuska, Sulamith Frerich. Framework for Augmented Reality Scenarios in Engineering
Education 620-626. [Crossref]
49. Kamil Krot, Vitalii Kutia. Intuitive Methods of Industrial Robot Programming in Advanced Manufacturing Systems
205-214. [Crossref]
50. Matthias Walter, Tim Wendisch, Klaus Bengler. In the Right Place at the Right Time? A View at Latency and Its
Implications for Automotive Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays 353-358. [Crossref]
51. Mark A. Livingston, Zhuming Ai, Jonathan W. Decker. Human Factors for Military Applications of Head-Worn
Augmented Reality Displays 56-65. [Crossref]
52. Rasimah Che Mohd Yusoff, Azhar Osman, Sya Azmeela Shariff, Noor Hafizah Hassan, Nilam Nur Amir Sjarif, Roslina
Ibrahim, Norziha Megat Zainuddin, Nurazean Maarop. A Systematic Literature Review of Augmented Reality Applications
in Libraries 1037-1046. [Crossref]
53. Maritzol Tenemaza, Rosa Navarrete, Erika Jaramillo, Andrés Rodriguez. Specific Dyslexia Exploratory Test (TEDE): Two
Tasks Using Augmented Reality 925-933. [Crossref]
54. Serkan Kivrak, Gokhan Arslan. Using Augmented Reality to Facilitate Construction Site Activities 215-221. [Crossref]
55. Fopefoluwa Bademosi, Raja R. A. Issa. Implementation of Augmented Reality Throughout the Lifecycle of Construction
Projects 307-313. [Crossref]
56. Ken Kencevski, Yu Zhang. VR and AR for Future Education 1-16. [Crossref]
57. Christopher Rechtien, Beke Redlich. Augmented Documentation  – Technische Innovation in den Praxisalltag
implementieren 213-224. [Crossref]
58. Valentin GOMEZ-JAUREGUI, Cristina MANCHADO, Jesús DEL-CASTILLO-IGAREDA, Cesar OTERO. 2019.
Quantitative evaluation of overlaying discrepancies in mobile augmented reality applications for AEC/FM. Advances in
Engineering Software 127, 124-140. [Crossref]
59. Daniel A. Tillman, Ross C. Teller, Paul E. Perez, Song A. An. Employing 3D Printing to Fabricate Augmented Reality
Headsets for Middle School STEM Education 241-261. [Crossref]
60. Nela Murauer, Steffi Gehrlicher. Evaluation of Order Picking Processes Regarding the Suitability of Smart Glasses-Based
Assistance Using Rasmussen’s Skills-Rules-Knowledge Framework 13-24. [Crossref]
61. Volker Paelke, Carsten Röcker, Jendrik Bulk. A Test Platform for the Evaluation of Augmented Reality Head Mounted
Displays in Industrial Applications 25-35. [Crossref]
62. Thomas Moser, Markus Hohlagschwandtner, Gerhard Kormann-Hainzl, Sabine Pölzlbauer, Josef Wolfartsberger. Mixed
Reality Applications in Industry: Challenges and Research Areas 95-105. [Crossref]
63. Tony Liao. 2019. Future directions for mobile augmented reality research: Understanding relationships between augmented
reality users, nonusers, content, devices, and industry. Mobile Media & Communication 7:1, 131-149. [Crossref]
64. Apoorva Chauhan, Whitney Lewis, Breanne K. Litts. Location and Place: Two Design Dimensions of Augmented Reality
in Mobile Technologies 1-15. [Crossref]
65. Sunwook Kim, Maury A. Nussbaum, Joseph L. Gabbard. 2019. Influences of augmented reality head-worn display type and
user interface design on performance and usability in simulated warehouse order picking. Applied Ergonomics 74, 186-193.
[Crossref]
66. Piotr Werner. 2019. Review of Implementation of Augmented Reality into the Georeferenced Analogue and Digital Maps
and Images. Information 10:1, 12. [Crossref]
67. Cléber G. Corrêa, Fátima L.S. Nunes, Edith Ranzini, Ricardo Nakamura, Romero Tori. 2019. Haptic interaction for
needle insertion training in medical applications: The state-of-the-art. Medical Engineering & Physics 63, 6-25. [Crossref]
68. Teresa Cardoso, Teresa Coimbra, Artur Mateus. 1. [Crossref]
69. Hung-Yeh Lin, Shelley Shwu-Ching Young. An Initial Design of the Mei Garden Augmented Reality Tour-Guide System
Based on the Needs Analysis 320-325. [Crossref]
70. Ah-Fur Lai, Chih-Hung Chen, Gon-Yi Lee. 2019. An augmented reality-based learning approach to enhancing students’
science reading performances from the perspective of the cognitive load theory. British Journal of Educational Technology
50:1, 232-247. [Crossref]
71. Ugo Erra, Nicola Capece. 2019. Engineering an advanced geo-location augmented reality framework for smart mobile
devices. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 10:1, 255-265. [Crossref]
72. Sergio Casas, Cristina Portalés, Inma García-Pereira, Jesús Gimeno. Mixing Different Realities in a Single Shared Space
175-192. [Crossref]
73. Aydin Tabrizi, Paola Sanguinetti. Literature Review of Augmented Reality Application in the Architecture, Engineering,
and Construction Industry With Relation to Building Information 61-73. [Crossref]
74. Paula Cristina Remoaldo, Vitor P. Ribeiro, Hélder Silva Lopes, Sara Catarina Gomes Silva. Geographic Information Systems
334-348. [Crossref]
75. Nahal Norouzi, Gerd Bruder, Brandon Belna, Stefanie Mutter, Damla Turgut, Greg Welch. A Systematic Review of the
Convergence of Augmented Reality, Intelligent Virtual Agents, and the Internet of Things 1-24. [Crossref]
76. Fei Tao, Meng Zhang, A.Y.C. Nee. Digital Twin and Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality/Mixed Reality 219-241.
[Crossref]
77. Moritz Armingeon, Pleurat Komani, Trupti Zanwar, Safak Korkut, Rolf Dornberger. A Case Study: Assessing
Effectiveness of the Augmented Reality Application in Augusta Raurica 99-111. [Crossref]
78. Fosse Zhang. A Novel Education Pattern Applied to Global Crowd of All Ages: Mobile Education 1-18. [Crossref]
79. Su-Ju Lu, Ying-Chieh Liu, Mei-Chun Lin, Fang-Hsuan Lu. 2019. Evaluating Reading Material Formats on Children
Learning in Science Education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 9:2, 99-104. [Crossref]
80. Fuyin Wei, Cyril Alias, Bernd Noche. Applications of Digital Technologies in Sustainable Logistics and Supply Chain
Management 235-263. [Crossref]
81. Ronald T. Azuma. 2019. The road to ubiquitous consumer augmented reality systems. Human Behavior and Emerging
Technologies 1:1, 26-32. [Crossref]
82. Imad A. Khalek, Jad M. Chalhoub, Steven K. Ayer. 2019. Augmented Reality for Identifying Maintainability Concerns
during Design. Advances in Civil Engineering 2019, 1. [Crossref]
83. Rong-Chi Chang, Zeng-Shiang Yu. 553. [Crossref]
84. Partho Pratim Seal. Guest Retention Through Automation 58-69. [Crossref]
85. Tobias Müller. 2019. Challenges in representing information with augmented reality to support manual procedural tasks.
AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering 3:1, 71-97. [Crossref]
86. Aikaterini-Georgia Mavroeidi, Angeliki Kitsiou, Christos Kalloniatis, Stefanos Gritzalis. 2019. Gamification vs. Privacy:
Identifying and Analysing the Major Concerns. Future Internet 11:3, 67. [Crossref]
87. Huan Deng, Cong Chen, Min-Yang He, Jiao-Jiao Li, Han-Le Zhang, Qiong-Hua Wang. 2019. High-resolution
augmented reality 3D display with use of a lenticular lens array holographic optical element. Journal of the Optical Society
of America A 36:4, 588. [Crossref]
88. Fangjing Ning, Yang Yang, Tingting Zhu, Tseden-Ish Bayarmaa, Ning Ma. Influence of Pre-service and In-service
Teachers’ Gender and Experience on the Acceptance of AR Technology 125-134. [Crossref]
89. Jan Robert Rost, Axel Friedewald, Niklas Jahn, Hermann Lödding. Koordination des maritimen Innenausbaus mit einem
digitalen Assistenzsystem 263-284. [Crossref]
90. Chris Panou, Lemonia Ragia, Despoina Dimelli, Katerina Mania. 2018. An Architecture for Mobile Outdoors Augmented
Reality for Cultural Heritage. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7:12, 463. [Crossref]
91. Vahid Rowghanian, Karim Ansari-Asl. 2018. Object tracking by mean shift and radial basis function neural networks.
Journal of Real-Time Image Processing 15:4, 799-816. [Crossref]
92. Tiago Fernández-Caramés, Paula Fraga-Lamas. 2018. Towards The Internet-of-Smart-Clothing: A Review on IoT
Wearables and Garments for Creating Intelligent Connected E-Textiles. Electronics 7:12, 405. [Crossref]
93. Girish Bekaroo, Roopesh Sungkur, Priscilla Ramsamy, Alexander Okolo, Waseemah Moedeen. 2018. Enhancing awareness
on green consumption of electronic devices: The application of Augmented Reality. Sustainable Energy Technologies and
Assessments 30, 279-291. [Crossref]
 94. Francisco Ramos, Sergio Trilles, Joaquín Torres-Sospedra, Francisco Perales. 2018. New Trends in Using Augmented
Reality Apps for Smart City Contexts. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7:12, 478. [Crossref]
95. Shuxin Liu, Yan Li, Pengcheng Zhou, Quanming Chen, Sida Li, Yueda Liu, Yunfeng Wang, Yikai Su. 2018. Full‐
color multi‐plane optical see‐through head‐mounted display for augmented reality applications. Journal of the Society for
Information Display 26:12, 687-693. [Crossref]
96. Ajaya Kumar Dash, Santosh Kumar Behera, Debi Prosad Dogra, Partha Pratim Roy. 2018. Designing of marker-based
augmented reality learning environment for kids using convolutional neural network architecture. Displays 55, 46-54.
[Crossref]
97. Kyu-Ho Lee, Jong-Ok Kim. 2018. Visibility enhancement via optimal two-piece gamma tone mapping for optical see-
through displays under ambient light. Optical Engineering 57:12, 1. [Crossref]
98. Iñigo Fernández del Amo, John Ahmet Erkoyuncu, Rajkumar Roy, Riccardo Palmarini, Demetrius Onoufriou. 2018. A
systematic review of Augmented Reality content-related techniques for knowledge transfer in maintenance applications.
Computers in Industry 103, 47-71. [Crossref]
99. Xiaodong Wei, Dongqiao Guo. Exploring the Influence of WebVR on the Creative Attitude of Digital Media Art Major
Students 231-235. [Crossref]
100. Larissa Neuburger, Julia Beck, Roman Egger. Chapter 9 The ‘Phygital’ Tourist Experiences: The Use of Augmented and
Virtual Reality in Destination Marketing 183-202. [Crossref]
101. Yannic Müller, Tyll Hartmann. 2018. Szenengenerierung für Augmented & Virtual Reality. ZWF Zeitschrift für
wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 113:11, 779-783. [Crossref]
102. Qing Hong Gao, Tao Ruan Wan, Wen Tang, Long Chen. 2018. Object registration in semi-cluttered and partial-occluded
scenes for augmented reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications 6. . [Crossref]
103. Stuart Eve. Augmented Reality 1-4. [Crossref]
104. Chai-Fen Tsai, Shih-Ching Yeh, Yanyan Huang, Zhengyu Wu, Jianjun Cui, Lirong Zheng. 2018. The Effect of
Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality on Inducing Anxiety for Exposure Therapy: A Comparison Using Heart Rate
Variability. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2018, 1-8. [Crossref]
105. Su-Ju Lu, Ying-Chieh Liu, Po-Ju Chen, Mu-Rong Hsieh. 2018. Evaluation of AR embedded physical puzzle game on
students’ learning achievement and motivation on elementary natural science. Interactive Learning Environments 12, 1-13.
[Crossref]
106. Janna Huuskonen, Timo Oksanen. 2018. Soil sampling with drones and augmented reality in precision agriculture.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 154, 25-35. [Crossref]
107. Christof Karmonik, Saba N. Elias, Jonathan Y. Zhang, Orlando Diaz, Richard P. Klucznik, Robert G. Grossman, Gavin
W. Britz. 2018. Augmented Reality with Virtual Cerebral Aneurysms: A Feasibility Study. World Neurosurgery 119, e617-
e622. [Crossref]
108. Carlos Flavián, Sergio Ibáñez-Sánchez, Carlos Orús. 2018. The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies
on the customer experience. Journal of Business Research . [Crossref]
109. Eugenijus Kurilovas. 2018. On data-driven decision-making for quality education. Computers in Human Behavior .
[Crossref]
110. S Wilujeng, D Chamidah, E Wahyuningtyas. 2018. Learning development model biological material "flowers wijaya
kusuma (Epiphyllum anguliger)” by using augmented reality media to facilitate independent learning students. IOP
Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 434, 012101. [Crossref]
111. Aaron L. Gardony, Shaina B. Martis, Holly A. Taylor, Tad T. Brunyé. 2018. Interaction Strategies for Effective Augmented
Reality Geo-Visualization: Insights from Spatial Cognition. Human–Computer Interaction 65, 1-43. [Crossref]
112. . References 269-288. [Crossref]
113. Christian Reuter, Thomas Ludwig, Patrick Mischur. 2018. RescueGlass: Collaborative Applications involving Head-
Mounted Displays for Red Cross Rescue Dog Units. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 6. . [Crossref]
114. Deepti Prit Kaur, Archana Mantri, Ben Horan. 2018. A Framework Utilizing Augmented Reality to Enhance the Teaching–
Learning Experience of Linear Control Systems. IETE Journal of Research 78, 1-10. [Crossref]
115. Justin Grandinetti, Charles Ecenbarger. 2018. Imagine Pokémon in the “Real” world: a Deleuzian approach to Pokémon
GO and augmented reality. Critical Studies in Media Communication 35:5, 440-454. [Crossref]
116. Ren-Jung Chang, Jun-Fu Liu. 2018. Model-Based Coarse-Fine Virtual Calibration and Visual Servo for Augmented
Reality-Assisted Peg-in-Hole Microassembly. Journal of Micro and Nano-Manufacturing 6:4, 041002. [Crossref]
117. Parviz Safadel, David White. 2018. Facilitating Molecular Biology Teaching by Using Augmented Reality (AR) and Protein
Data Bank (PDB). TechTrends 6. . [Crossref]
118. Rainier Barrett, Heta A. Gandhi, Anusha Naganathan, Danielle Daniels, Yang Zhang, Chibueze Onwunaka, April
Luehmann, Andrew D. White. 2018. Social and Tactile Mixed Reality Increases Student Engagement in Undergraduate
Lab Activities. Journal of Chemical Education 95:10, 1755-1762. [Crossref]
119. A. V. Ivanova. 2018. VR & AR TECHNOLOGIES: OPPORTUNITIES AND APPLICATION OBSTACLES. Strategic
decisions and risk management :3, 88-107. [Crossref]
120. Anchuli Felicia King. 2018. Moving masks and mobile monkeys: the technodramaturgy of Augmented Reality puppets.
Theatre and Performance Design 4:4, 324-341. [Crossref]
121. Shao-Chen Chang, Gwo-Jen Hwang. 2018. Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on
students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education 125, 226-239. [Crossref]
122. Jérȏme Jetter, Jörgen Eimecke, Alexandra Rese. 2018. Augmented reality tools for industrial applications: What are
potential key performance indicators and who benefits?. Computers in Human Behavior 87, 18-33. [Crossref]
123. Eric E. Goff, Kelly Lynn Mulvey, Matthew J. Irvin, Adam Hartstone-Rose. 2018. Applications of Augmented Reality in
Informal Science Learning Sites: a Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology 27:5, 433-447. [Crossref]
124. Qiming Li, Chen Huang, Zhengwei Yao, Yimin Chen, Lizhuang Ma. 2018. Continuous dynamic gesture spotting
algorithm based on Dempster-Shafer Theory in the augmented reality human computer interaction. The International
Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 14:5, e1931. [Crossref]
125. Minjuan Wang, Vic Callaghan, Jodi Bernhardt, Kevin White, Anasol Peña-Rios. 2018. Augmented reality in education and
training: pedagogical approaches and illustrative case studies. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
9:5, 1391-1402. [Crossref]
126. Alessandro Ricci, Mirko Viroli, Andrea Omicini, Stefano Mariani, Angelo Croatti, Danilo Pianini. 2018. Spatial Tuples:
Augmenting reality with tuples. Expert Systems 35:5, e12273. [Crossref]
127. Mark Yi-Cheon Yim, Sun-Young Park. 2018. “I am not satisfied with my body, so I like augmented reality (AR)”. Journal
of Business Research . [Crossref]
128. Rong-Chi Chang, Zeng-Shiang Yu. 2018. Using Augmented Reality Technologies to Enhance Students' Engagement and
Achievement in Science Laboratories. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies 16:4, 54-72. [Crossref]
129. Abhiraj Deshpande, Inki Kim. 2018. The effects of augmented reality on improving spatial problem solving for object
assembly. Advanced Engineering Informatics 38, 760-775. [Crossref]
130. Han Li, Ashish Gupta, Jie Zhang, Nick Flor. 2018. Who will use augmented reality? An integrated approach based on
text analytics and field survey. European Journal of Operational Research . [Crossref]
131. Bradley Herbert, Barrett Ens, Amali Weerasinghe, Mark Billinghurst, Grant Wigley. 2018. Design considerations for
combining augmented reality with intelligent tutors. Computers & Graphics . [Crossref]
132. Au Thien Wan, Leong Yat San, Mohammad Saiful Omar. 2018. Augmented Reality Technology for Year 10 Chemistry
Class. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 8:4, 45-64. [Crossref]
133. Jene W. Meulstee, Johan Nijsink, Ruud Schreurs, Luc M. Verhamme, Tong Xi, Hans H. K. Delye, Wilfred A. Borstlap,
Thomas J. J. Maal. 2018. Toward Holographic-Guided Surgery. Surgical Innovation 34, 155335061879955. [Crossref]
134. Vuthea Chheang, Sangkwon Jeong, Gookhwan Lee, Jong-Sung Ha, Kwan-Hee Yoo. 2018. Natural embedding of live
actors and entities into 360° virtual reality scenes. The Journal of Supercomputing 25. . [Crossref]
135. Silvia Blanco-Pons, Berta Carrión-Ruiz, José Luis Lerma. 2018. Augmented reality application assessment for
disseminating rock art. Multimedia Tools and Applications 5. . [Crossref]
136. Pengcheng Zhou, Yan Li, Shuxin Liu, Yikai Su. 2018. Compact design for optical-see-through holographic displays
employing holographic optical elements. Optics Express 26:18, 22866. [Crossref]
137. Daniel Tolks, Kevin Dadaczynski, David Horstmann. 2018. Einführung in die Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft
von Serious Games (for Health). Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 32. . [Crossref]
138. Stefan Lawrence, Garry Crawford. Football 2.0? 186-204. [Crossref]
139. Ayoung Suh, Jane Prophet. 2018. The state of immersive technology research: A literature analysis. Computers in Human
Behavior 86, 77-90. [Crossref]
140. Damla Karagozlu. 2018. Determination of the impact of augmented reality application on the success and problem-solving
skills of students. Quality & Quantity 52:5, 2393-2402. [Crossref]
141. Gabriel de A. Pereira, João Bravo, Jorge Centeno. 2018. A User Study of a Prototype of a Spatial Augmented Reality
System for Education and Interaction with Geographic Data. Big Data and Cognitive Computing 2:3, 20. [Crossref]
142. Tamás Ruppert, Szilárd Jaskó, Tibor Holczinger, János Abonyi. 2018. Enabling Technologies for Operator 4.0: A Survey.
Applied Sciences 8:9, 1650. [Crossref]
143. Benish Fida, Fabrizio Cutolo, Gregorio di Franco, Mauro Ferrari, Vincenzo Ferrari. 2018. Augmented reality in open
surgery. Updates in Surgery 70:3, 389-400. [Crossref]
144. Ioana Opriş, Sorina Costinaş, Cristina S. Ionescu, Daniela E. Gogoaşe Nistoran. 2018. Step-by-step augmented reality in
power engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 26:5, 1590-1602. [Crossref]
145. Julia Daisy Fraustino, Ji Young Lee, Sang Yeal Lee, Hongmin Ahn. 2018. Effects of 360° video on attitudes toward disaster
communication: Mediating and moderating roles of spatial presence and prior disaster media involvement. Public Relations
Review 44:3, 331-341. [Crossref]
146. Joachim Scholz, Katherine Duffy. 2018. We ARe at home: How augmented reality reshapes mobile marketing and
consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 44, 11-23. [Crossref]
147. M Klyueva, M Boyarkin, K Bychenkov, A Nikonorov. 2018. Object occlusion recognition to increase an accuracy of ToF-
tracking in augmented reality systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1096, 012090. [Crossref]
148. Hsiao-Ping Hsu, Zou Wenting, Joan E. Hughes. 2018. Developing Elementary Students’ Digital Literacy Through
Augmented Reality Creation: Insights From a Longitudinal Analysis of Questionnaires, Interviews, and Projects. Journal
of Educational Computing Research 17, 073563311879451. [Crossref]
149. Jorge Bacca, Silvia Baldiris, Ramon Fabregat, Kinshuk. 2018. Insights Into the Factors Influencing Student Motivation in
Augmented Reality Learning Experiences in Vocational Education and Training. Frontiers in Psychology 9. . [Crossref]
150. Ezlika Ghazali, Dilip S. Mutum, Mei-Yuen Woon. 2018. Exploring player behavior and motivations to continue playing
Pokémon GO. Information Technology & People 10. . [Crossref]
151. J.C. Arbeláez, Gilberto Osorio-Gómez. 2018. Crowdsourcing Augmented Reality Environment (CARE) for aesthetic
evaluation of products in conceptual stage. Computers in Industry 99, 241-252. [Crossref]
152. Zhen Xiong, Lin Zhi, Jie Jiang. The Research of Developing Virtual Jewelry Worn System Based on AR Toolkit 1-3.
[Crossref]
153. Susann Winkler, Juela Kazazi, Mark Vollrath. 2018. How to warn drivers in various safety-critical situations – Different
strategies, different reactions. Accident Analysis & Prevention 117, 410-426. [Crossref]
154. María-Blanca Ibáñez, Carlos Delgado-Kloos. 2018. Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers
& Education 123, 109-123. [Crossref]
155. Kai-Yi Chin, Ching-Sheng Wang, Yen-Lin Chen. 2018. Effects of an augmented reality-based mobile system on students’
learning achievements and motivation for a liberal arts course. Interactive Learning Environments 17, 1-15. [Crossref]
156. Alan G. Millard, Richard Redpath, Alistair M. Jewers, Charlotte Arndt, Russell Joyce, James A. Hilder, Liam J. McDaid,
David M. Halliday. 2018. ARDebug: An Augmented Reality Tool for Analysing and Debugging Swarm Robotic Systems.
Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5. . [Crossref]
157. Annamaria Recupero, Stefano Triberti, Camilla Modesti, Alessandra Talamo. 2018. Mixed Reality for Cross-Cultural
Integration: Using Positive Technology to Share Experiences and Promote Communication. Frontiers in Psychology 9. .
[Crossref]
158. Mustafa Sirakaya, Ebru Kilic Cakmak. 2018. The Effect of Augmented Reality Use on Achievement, Misconception and
Course Engagement. Contemporary Educational Technology 297-314. [Crossref]
159. Yu-Hsuan Chen, Chang-Hwa Wang. 2018. Learner presence, perception, and learning achievements in augmented–reality–
mediated learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments 26:5, 695-708. [Crossref]
160. Zeynep Turan, Elif Meral, Ibrahim Fevzi Sahin. 2018. The impact of mobile augmented reality in geography education:
achievements, cognitive loads and views of university students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 42:3, 427-441.
[Crossref]
161. Iina E. Aaltonen, Mikael Wahlström. 2018. Envisioning robotic surgery: Surgeons' needs and views on interacting with
future technologies and interfaces. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 9, e1941.
[Crossref]
162. Brady D. Lund, Daniel A. Agbaji. 2018. Augmented Reality for Browsing Physical Collections in Academic Libraries.
Public Services Quarterly 14:3, 275-282. [Crossref]
163. Hoshang Kolivand, Abdennour El Rhalibi, Mohd Shahrizal Sunar, Tanzila Saba. 2018. ReVitAge: Realistic virtual heritage
taking shadows and sky illumination into account. Journal of Cultural Heritage 32, 166-175. [Crossref]
164. F Aditya, B Trisno. 2018. Learning Media Based on Augmented Reality Applied on the Lesson of Electrical Network
Protection System. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 384, 012075. [Crossref]
165. Ulrik Ekman. 2018. Smart City Planning. International Journal of E-Planning Research 7:3, 1-21. [Crossref]
166. Alex Ibáñez-Etxeberria, Olaia Fontal Merillas, Pilar Rivero Gracia. 2018. Educación patrimonial y TIC en España: marco
normativo, variables estructurantes y programas referentes. Arbor 194:788, 448. [Crossref]
167. Dov Schafer, David Kaufman. Augmenting Reality with Intelligent Interfaces . [Crossref]
168. Kaushal Kumar Bhagat, Wei-Kai Liou, J. Michael Spector, Chun-Yen Chang. 2018. To use augmented reality or not in
formative assessment: a comparative study. Interactive Learning Environments 1-11. [Crossref]
169. Gül DENKTAŞ ŞAKAR, Ebru SÜRÜCÜ. 2018. LİMANCILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE MAVİ OKYANUS STRATEJİSİ
OLARAK ARTTIRILMIŞ GERÇEKLİK. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi . [Crossref]
170. Nurhazarifah Che Hashim, Nazatul Aini Abd Majid, Haslina Arshad, Waqas Khalid Obeidy. 2018. User Satisfaction for
an Augmented Reality Application to Support Productive Vocabulary Using Speech Recognition. Advances in Multimedia
2018, 1-10. [Crossref]
171. Cristina Fenu, Fabio Pittarello. 2018. Svevo tour: The design and the experimentation of an augmented reality application
for engaging visitors of a literary museum. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 114, 20-35. [Crossref]
172. , , , , . 2018. Vision-Based Autonomous Landing of a Quadrotor on the Perturbed Deck of an Unmanned Surface Vehicle.
Drones 2:2, 15. [Crossref]
173. Cristina Portalés. 2018. When Augmented Reality Met Art: Lessons Learned from Researcher–Artist Interdisciplinary
Work. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2:2, 17. [Crossref]
174. Ojaswa Sharma, Jalaj Pandey, Hammad Akhtar, Gaurav Rathee. 2018. Navigation in AR based on digital replicas. The
Visual Computer 34:6-8, 925-936. [Crossref]
175. Nicola Liberati. 2018. Phenomenology, Pokémon Go, and Other Augmented Reality Games. Human Studies 41:2, 211-232.
[Crossref]
176. Tiago Fernández-Caramés, Paula Fraga-Lamas, Manuel Suárez-Albela, Miguel Vilar-Montesinos. 2018. A Fog Computing
and Cloudlet Based Augmented Reality System for the Industry 4.0 Shipyard. Sensors 18:6, 1798. [Crossref]
177. Federico Debandi, Roberto Iacoviello, Alberto Messina, Maurizio Montagnuolo, Federico Manuri, Andrea Sanna, Davide
Zappia. 2018. Enhancing cultural tourism by a mixed reality application for outdoor navigation and information browsing
using immersive devices. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 364, 012048. [Crossref]
178. Bibiana Martínez, Sergio Casas, María Vidal-González, Lucía Vera, Inma García-Pereira. 2018. TinajAR: An Edutainment
Augmented Reality Mirror for the Dissemination and Reinterpretation of Cultural Heritage. Multimodal Technologies and
Interaction 2:2, 33. [Crossref]
179. Izwan Nurli Mat Bistaman, Syed Zulkarnain Syed Idrus, Salleh Abd Rashid. 2018. The Use of Augmented Reality
Technology for Primary School Education in Perlis, Malaysia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1019, 012064. [Crossref]
180. Zalfie Ardian, P. Insap Santoso, Bimo Sunarfri Hantono. 2018. ARgot: Text-Based Detection Systems In Real Time
Using Augmented Reality For Media Translator Aceh-Indonesia With Android-Based Smartphones. Journal of Physics:
Conference Series 1019, 012074. [Crossref]
181. Leman Figen Gül. 2018. Studying gesture-based interaction on a mobile augmented reality application for co-design
activity. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 12:2, 109-124. [Crossref]
182. Fei Liu, Stefan Seipel. 2018. Precision study on augmented reality-based visual guidance for facility management tasks.
Automation in Construction 90, 79-90. [Crossref]
183. Shih-Wei Sun, Yi-Shan Lan. 2018. Augmented reality displaying scheme in a smart glass based on relative object positions
and orientation sensors. World Wide Web 6. . [Crossref]
184. Rabia M. Yilmaz. Augmented Reality Trends in Education between 2016 and 2017 Years . [Crossref]
185. Nikolaos Pellas, Panagiotis Fotaris, Ioannis Kazanidis, David Wells. 2018. Augmenting the learning experience in primary
and secondary school education: a systematic review of recent trends in augmented reality game-based learning. Virtual
Reality 20. . [Crossref]
186. Tassos Kanellos, Adam Doulgerakis, Eftichia Georgiou, Maria Bessa, Argiro Vatakis, Áine Behan, Jordi Navarra, Stelios
C. A. Thomopoulos, Jon Arambarri. FocusLocus: ADHD management gaming system for educational achievement and
social inclusion 14. [Crossref]
187. Raffaele De Amicis, Alessandro Ceruti, Daniela Francia, Leonardo Frizziero, Bruno Simões. 2018. Augmented Reality for
virtual user manual. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 12:2, 689-697. [Crossref]
188. Daniel Lima Gomes, Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva, Aristófanes Corrêa Silva, Geraldo Braz, João Dallyson Sousa de Almeida,
Antônio Sérgio de Araújo, Marcelo Gattas. 2018. Augmented visualization using homomorphic filtering and Haar-based
natural markers for power systems substations. Computers in Industry 97, 67-75. [Crossref]
189. Luis Valente, Bruno Feijó, Alexandre Ribeiro, Esteban Clua. 2018. Pervasive virtuality in digital entertainment applications
and its quality requirements. Entertainment Computing 26, 139-152. [Crossref]
190. Namho Chung, Hyunae Lee, Jin-Young Kim, Chulmo Koo. 2018. The Role of Augmented Reality for Experience-
Influenced Environments: The Case of Cultural Heritage Tourism in Korea. Journal of Travel Research 57:5, 627-643.
[Crossref]
191. Iis P. Tussyadiah, Timothy Hyungsoo Jung, M. Claudia tom Dieck. 2018. Embodiment of Wearable Augmented Reality
Technology in Tourism Experiences. Journal of Travel Research 57:5, 597-611. [Crossref]
192. Fernando Reyes-Aviles, Carlos Aviles-Cruz. 2018. Handheld augmented reality system for resistive electric circuits
understanding for undergraduate students. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 26:3, 602-616. [Crossref]
193. Eun Kyoung Yang, Jee Hyun Lee. 2018. Fashion Illustration using the Digital Frame of Augmented Reality. Journal of
the Korean Society of Costume 68:3, 90-102. [Crossref]
194. Arindam Dey, Mark Billinghurst, Robert W. Lindeman, J. Edward Swan. 2018. A Systematic Review of 10 Years of
Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5. . [Crossref]
195. Steve Richey. 2018. Utilizing Presence in Augmented-Reality Applications to Improve Learning Outcomes. Performance
Improvement 57:4, 10-18. [Crossref]
196. Jae Hwan Bong, Hyun-jong Song, Yoojin Oh, Namji Park, Hyungmin Kim, Shinsuk Park. 2018. Endoscopic navigation
system with extended field of view using augmented reality technology. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and
Computer Assisted Surgery 14:2, e1886. [Crossref]
197. Erkan Bostanci, Betul Bostanci, Nadia Kanwal, Adrian F. Clark. 2018. Sensor fusion of camera, GPS and IMU using fuzzy
adaptive multiple motion models. Soft Computing 22:8, 2619-2632. [Crossref]
198. Gwo-Jen Hwang, Shao-Chen Chang, Pei-Ying Chen, Xiang-Ya Chen. 2018. Effects of integrating an active learning-
promoting mechanism into location-based real-world learning environments on students’ learning performances and
behaviors. Educational Technology Research and Development 66:2, 451-474. [Crossref]
199. Mohamed Zaifri, Ahmed Azough, Said Ouatik El Alaoui. Experimentation of visual augmented reality for visiting the
historical monuments of the medina of Fez 1-4. [Crossref]
200. Cristina Portalés, Sergio Casas, Jesús Gimeno, Marcos Fernández, Montse Poza. 2018. From the Paper to the Tablet: On
the Design of an AR-Based Tool for the Inspection of Pre-Fab Buildings. Preliminary Results of the SIRAE Project.
Sensors 18:4, 1262. [Crossref]
201. Javier Sanchez Guerrero, Javier Salazar Mera, Wilma Gavilanes Lopez, Rina Sanchez Reinoso, Cristhian Tamami Davila.
Use of Augmented Reality AR in University Environments 291-297. [Crossref]
202. Alexander Plopski, Varunyu Fuvattanasilp, Jarkko Poldi, Takafumi Taketomi, Christian Sandor, Hirokazu Kato. Efficient
In-Situ Creation of Augmented Reality Tutorials 7-11. [Crossref]
203. F. Bork. 2018. „Interactive augmented reality systems“. Der Unfallchirurg 121:4, 286-292. [Crossref]
204. Sébastien Kuntz, Richard Kulpa, Jérôme Royan. The Democratization of VR-AR 73-122. [Crossref]
205. Yang Feng, Barbara Mueller. 2018. The State of Augmented Reality Advertising Around The Globe: A Multi-Cultural
Content Analysis. Journal of Promotion Management 17, 1-23. [Crossref]
206. Mafkereseb Kassahun Bekele, Roberto Pierdicca, Emanuele Frontoni, Eva Savina Malinverni, James Gain. 2018. A Survey
of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality for Cultural Heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 11:2, 1-36.
[Crossref]
207. Timothy Hyungsoo Jung, Hyunae Lee, Namho Chung, M. Claudia tom Dieck. 2018. Cross-cultural differences in
adopting mobile augmented reality at cultural heritage tourism sites. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
Management 30:3, 1621-1645. [Crossref]
208. Cathy Weng, Abirami Rathinasabapathi, Apollo Weng, Cindy Zagita. 2018. Mixed Reality in Science Education as
a Learning Support: A Revitalized Science Book. Journal of Educational Computing Research 62, 073563311875701.
[Crossref]
209. Yen-Yu Wang, Atul Kumar, Kai-Che Liu, Shih-Wei Huang, Ching-Chun Huang, Wei-Chia Su, Fu-Li Hsiao, Wen-Nung
Lie. 2018. Stereoscopic augmented reality for single camera endoscopy: a virtual study. Computer Methods in Biomechanics
and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization 6:2, 182-191. [Crossref]
210. Pedro Quelhas Brito, Jasmina Stoyanova, António Coelho. 2018. Augmented reality versus conventional interface: Is there
any difference in effectiveness?. Multimedia Tools and Applications 77:6, 7487-7516. [Crossref]
211. Amir H. Behzadan, Carol C. Menassa, Vineet R. Kamat. Georeferenced Augmented Reality for Discovery-Based Learning
in Civil Engineering 199-228. [Crossref]
212. R F Rahmat, F Akbar, M F Syahputra, M A Budiman, A Hizriadi. 2018. An Interactive Augmented Reality
Implementation of Hijaiyah Alphabet for Children Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 978, 012102. [Crossref]
213. F A Purnomo, P I Santosa, R Hartanto, E H Pratisto, A Purbayu. 2018. Implementation of Augmented Reality Technology
in Sangiran Museum with Vuforia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 333, 012103. [Crossref]
214. Yuri Sato, Yutaro Sugimoto, Kazuhiro Ueda. 2018. Real Objects Can Impede Conditional Reasoning but Augmented
Objects Do Not. Cognitive Science 42:2, 691-707. [Crossref]
215. Timothy O’Connor, Siddharth Rawat, Adam Markman, Bahram Javidi. 2018. Automatic cell identification and
visualization using digital holographic microscopy with head mounted augmented reality devices. Applied Optics 57:7, B197.
[Crossref]
216. Mayra Machuca, Winyu Chinthammit, Weidong Huang, Rainer Wasinger, Henry Duh. 2018. Enabling Symmetric
Collaboration in Public Spaces through 3D Mobile Interaction. Symmetry 10:3, 69. [Crossref]
217. Hiroaki Nakanishi, Hiroyuki Hashimoto. 2018. AR-Marker/IMU Hybrid Navigation System for Tether-Powered UAV.
Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 30:1, 76-85. [Crossref]
218. Po-Han Wu, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Mei-Ling Yang, Chih-Hung Chen. 2018. Impacts of integrating the repertory grid into
an augmented reality-based learning design on students’ learning achievements, cognitive load and degree of satisfaction.
Interactive Learning Environments 26:2, 221-234. [Crossref]
219. Malaika Brengman, Kim Willems, Helena Van Kerrebroeck. 2018. Can’t touch this: the impact of augmented reality versus
touch and non-touch interfaces on perceived ownership. Virtual Reality 6. . [Crossref]
220. Yue Wang, Shusheng Zhang, Sen Yang, Weiping He, Xiaoliang Bai. 2018. Mechanical assembly assistance using marker-
less augmented reality system. Assembly Automation 38:1, 77-87. [Crossref]
221. Christof Karmonik, Timothy B. Boone, Rose Khavari. 2018. Workflow for Visualization of Neuroimaging Data with an
Augmented Reality Device. Journal of Digital Imaging 31:1, 26-31. [Crossref]
222. Lotfi Abdi, Aref Meddeb. 2018. In-vehicle augmented reality system to provide driving safety information. Journal of
Visualization 21:1, 163-184. [Crossref]
223. Riccardo Palmarini, John Ahmet Erkoyuncu, Rajkumar Roy, Hosein Torabmostaedi. 2018. A systematic review of
augmented reality applications in maintenance. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 49, 215-228. [Crossref]
224. D Rohendi, S Septian, H Sutarno. 2018. The Use of Geometry Learning Media Based on Augmented Reality for Junior
High School Students. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 306, 012029. [Crossref]
225. C. Llena, S. Folguera, L. Forner, F. J. Rodríguez-Lozano. 2018. Implementation of augmented reality in operative dentistry
learning. European Journal of Dental Education 22:1, e122-e130. [Crossref]
226. Jia Liu, Jingjing Zhang, Jianhui Mei, Xiaorui Zhang. 2018. CH-Marker: A Color Marker Robust to Occlusion for
Augmented Reality. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 32:02, 1854004. [Crossref]
227. Tony Liao. 2018. Mobile versus headworn augmented reality: How visions of the future shape, contest, and stabilize an
emerging technology. New Media & Society 20:2, 796-814. [Crossref]
228. Michael Cowling, James Birt. 2018. Pedagogy before Technology: A Design-Based Research Approach to Enhancing
Skills Development in Paramedic Science Using Mixed Reality. Information 9:2, 29. [Crossref]
229. Herbert Thomas. 2018. Powerful knowledge, technology and education in the future-focused good society. Technology
in Society 52, 54-59. [Crossref]
230. David Kelly, Thuong N. Hoang, Martin Reinoso, Zaher Joukhadar, Tamara Clements, Frank Vetere. 2018. Augmented
reality learning environment for physiotherapy education. Physical Therapy Reviews 23:1, 21-28. [Crossref]
231. Ulka Chandini Pendit, Syamsul Bahrin Zaibon, Juliana Aida Abu Bakar. Conceptual Model of Mobile Augmented Reality
for Cultural Heritage 1-13. [Crossref]
232. Mustafa Esengün, Gökhan İnce. The Role of Augmented Reality in the Age of Industry 4.0 201-215. [Crossref]
233. Sule Satoglu, Alp Ustundag, Emre Cevikcan, Mehmet Bulent Durmusoglu. Lean Production Systems for Industry 4.0
43-59. [Crossref]
234. Gavin Sim, Brendan Cassidy, Janet C. Read. Crowdsourcing Ideas for Augmented Reality Museum Experiences with
Children 75-93. [Crossref]
235. Thomas Alexander, Alexander Ripkens, Martin Westhoven, Michael Kleiber, Claudius Pfendler. Virtual Tele-
Cooperation: Applying AR and VR for Cooperative Tele-Maintenance and Advanced Distance Learning 234-244.
[Crossref]
236. Volker Paelke, Sebastian Büttner, Henrik Mucha, Carsten Röcker. A Checklist Based Approach for Evaluating Augmented
Reality Displays in Industrial Applications 225-234. [Crossref]
237. Azad M. Madni. Looking to the Future 187-204. [Crossref]
238. Patrick T. Allen, Ava Fatah gen. Shieck, David Robison. Urban Encounters Reloaded: Towards a Descriptive Account of
Augmented Space 259-273. [Crossref]
239. Larissa Neuburger, Roman Egger. Augmented Reality: Providing a Different Dimension for Museum Visitors 65-77.
[Crossref]
240. Ruhet Genç. The Impact of Augmented Reality (AR) Technology on Tourist Satisfaction 109-116. [Crossref]
241. Mark Smith, Ananda Maiti, Andrew D. Maxwell, Alexander A. Kist. Object Detection Resource Usage Within a Remote
Real-Time Video Stream 266-277. [Crossref]
242. Matthias Neges, Mario Wolf, Michael Abramovici. Enabling Round-Trip Engineering Between P&I Diagrams and
Augmented Reality Work Instructions in Maintenance Processes Utilizing Graph-Based Modelling 33-42. [Crossref]
243. Karol Jędrasiak, Natalia Hładczuk, Krzysztof Daniec, Aleksander Nawrat. Interactive Application Using Augmented Reality
and Photogrammetric Scanning 267-290. [Crossref]
244. Gehad Hassan, Nashwa Abdelbaki. Gesture Recognition for Improved User Experience in Augmented Biology Lab
299-308. [Crossref]
245. Hugo M. Kehr, Matthias Strasser, Andrea Paulus. Motivation and Volition in the Workplace 819-852. [Crossref]
246. Filip Gorski, Radoslaw Wichniarek, Wieslaw Kuczko, Pawel Bun, John A. Erkoyuncu. Augmented Reality in Training of
Fused Deposition Modelling Process 565-574. [Crossref]
247. Geoffrey Alan Rhodes. Augmented Reality in Art: Aesthetics and Material for Expression 163-172. [Crossref]
248. Sule Satoglu, Alp Ustundag, Emre Cevikcan, Mehmet Bulent Durmusoglu. Lean Transformation Integrated with Industry
4.0 Implementation Methodology 97-107. [Crossref]
249. Clement Onime, James Uhomoibhi, Hui Wang. A Mixed-Reality Environment for Personalised and Collaborative
Learning in Science and Engineering 567-578. [Crossref]
250. Pedro Liberato, Dália Liberato, António Abreu, Elisa Alén-González, Álvaro Rocha. The Information Technologies in
the Competitiveness of the Tourism Sector 86-94. [Crossref]
251. Moritz Quandt, Thies Beinke, Michael Freitag, Christian Kölsch. Requirements for an Augmented Reality-Based
Assistance System 335-340. [Crossref]
252. Pedro Liberato, Dália Liberato, António Abreu, Elisa Alén-González, Álvaro Rocha. Generation Y: The Competitiveness
of the Tourism Sector Based on Digital Technology 227-240. [Crossref]
253. Salma S. Abed. Opportunities and Challenges of Augmented Reality Shopping in Emerging Markets 107-117. [Crossref]
254. Panagiotis E. Antoniou, Maria Mpaka, Ioanna Dratsiou, Katerina Aggeioplasti, Melpomeni Tsitouridou, Panagiotis D.
Bamidis. Scoping the Window to the Universe; Design Considerations and Expert Evaluation of an Augmented Reality
Mobile Application for Astronomy Education 409-420. [Crossref]
255. Margaret E. Kosal, Alaina Totten. Introduction 1-14. [Crossref]
256. Meghan A. Check. Augmenting Intelligence: What Augmented Reality Technology Means for the Intelligence Community
237-250. [Crossref]
257. Lucía Vera, Jesús Gimeno, Sergio Casas, Inma García-Pereira, Cristina Portalés. A Hybrid Virtual-Augmented Serious
Game to Improve Driving Safety Awareness 293-310. [Crossref]
258. Hanna Schraffenberger, Edwin van der Heide. Reconsidering Registration: New Perspectives on Augmented Reality
172-183. [Crossref]
259. Ananda Maiti, Mark Smith, Andrew D. Maxwell, Alexander A. Kist. Augmented Reality and Natural User Interface
Applications for Remote Laboratories 79-109. [Crossref]
260. Fernando Moreira, Natércia Durão, Carla Santos Pereira, Maria João Ferreira. Are University Professors of the South
American Countries Preparing Students for Digital Transformation? 1296-1306. [Crossref]
261. Roy Damgrave. Augmented Reality 1-3. [Crossref]
262. Benedikt Zobel, Sebastian Werning, Dirk Metzger, Oliver Thomas. Augmented und Virtual Reality: Stand der Technik,
Nutzenpotenziale und Einsatzgebiete 123-140. [Crossref]
263. Andreas Moring, Lukas Maiwald, Timo Kewitz. Digitalisierung in der Immobilienvermittlung 77-133. [Crossref]
264. Claudia de Witt, Christina Gloerfeld. Mobile Learning and Higher Education 61-79. [Crossref]
265. Oliver Thomas, Dirk Metzger, Helmut Niegemann, Markus Welk, Thomas Becker. GLASSROOM – Kompetenzaufbau
und -entwicklung in virtuellen Lebenswelten 2-19. [Crossref]
266. Benedikt Zobel, Sebastian Werning, Lisa Berkemeier, Oliver Thomas. Augmented- und Virtual-Reality-Technologien
zur Digitalisierung der Aus- und Weiterbildung – Überblick, Klassifikation und Vergleich 20-34. [Crossref]
267. Caroline Nevejan, Frances Brazier. Design for the Value of Presence 1-23. [Crossref]
268. Håkon Raabe, Odd Myklebust, Ragnhild Eleftheriadis. Vision Based Quality Control and Maintenance in High Volume
Production by Use of Zero Defect Strategies 405-412. [Crossref]
269. Su Cai. Case Studies of Augmented Reality Applications for Authentic Learning 115-134. [Crossref]
270. Hui Ye, Ruizhi Shi, Shenghui Li. Status and Tendency of Augmented Expression for Paper Map 221-231. [Crossref]
271. Yi Zeng, Duo Li, Guangtao Zhai. Indoor Localization System for Individuals with Visual Impairment 478-491. [Crossref]
272. Chen-Chiou Chiu, Lai-Chung Lee. 2018. System satisfaction survey for the App to integrate search and augmented reality
with geographical information technology. Microsystem Technologies 24:1, 319-341. [Crossref]
273. Alvise Memo, Pietro Zanuttigh. 2018. Head-mounted gesture controlled interface for human-computer interaction.
Multimedia Tools and Applications 77:1, 27-53. [Crossref]
274. Nick Hedley. Augmented Reality and GIS 355-368. [Crossref]
275. Anne Collins McLaughlin, Laura A. Matalenas, Maribeth Gandy Coleman. Design of human centered augmented reality
for managing chronic health conditions 261-296. [Crossref]
276. Daniela Kugelmann, Leonard Stratmann, Nils Nühlen, Felix Bork, Saskia Hoffmann, Golbarg Samarbarksh, Anna
Pferschy, Anna Maria von der Heide, Andreas Eimannsberger, Pascal Fallavollita, Nassir Navab, Jens Waschke. 2018. An
Augmented Reality magic mirror as additive teaching device for gross anatomy. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger
215, 71-77. [Crossref]
277. Rafael Muñoz-Salinas, Manuel J. Marín-Jimenez, Enrique Yeguas-Bolivar, R. Medina-Carnicer. 2018. Mapping and
localization from planar markers. Pattern Recognition 73, 158-171. [Crossref]
278. Gopika Premsankar, Mario Di Francesco, Tarik Taleb. 2018. Edge Computing for the Internet of Things: A Case Study.
IEEE Internet of Things Journal 1-1. [Crossref]
279. Anasol Pena-Rios, Hani Hagras, Gilbert Owusu, Michael Gardner. 2018. Furthering Service 4.0: Harnessing Intelligent
Immersive Environments and Systems. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine 4:1, 20-31. [Crossref]
280. Lisa M. Rühmann, Michael Prilla, Gordon Brown. Cooperative Mixed Reality 107-111. [Crossref]
281. Kazuki Otao, Yuta Itoh, Kazuki Takazawa, Hiroyuki Osone, Yoichi Ochiai. Air Mounted Eyepiece 1-7. [Crossref]
282. Melvin Rafi, Balaji Chandrasekaran, Bill Kusmez, James E. Steck, Jibo He. 2018. Real-Time Google Glass Heads-Up
Display for Rapid Air-Traffic Detection. Journal of Aircraft 55:1, 263-274. [Crossref]
283. Hina Akasaki, Kota Gushima, Tatsuo Nakajima. Providing Daily Casual Information Through Eye Contact with
Emotional Creatures 278-291. [Crossref]
284. Ping Wang, Guili Xu, Zhengsheng Wang, Yuehua Cheng. 2018. An efficient solution to the perspective-three-point pose
problem. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 166, 81-87. [Crossref]
285. Jean-Daniel Taupiac, Nancy Rodriguez, Olivier Strauss. Immercity: A Curation Content Application in Virtual and
Augmented Reality 223-234. [Crossref]
286. Marta del Rio Guerra, Jorge Martín-Gutiérrez, Raúl Vargas-Lizárraga, Israel Garza-Bernal. Determining Which Touch
Gestures Are Commonly Used When Visualizing Physics Problems in Augmented Reality 3-12. [Crossref]
287. Simon Su, Vincent Perry, Qiang Guan, Andrew Durkee, Alexis R. Neigel, Sue Kase. Sensor Data Fusion Framework to
Improve Holographic Object Registration Accuracy for a Shared Augmented Reality Mission Planning Scenario 202-214.
[Crossref]
288. Tanja Aitamurto, Jean-Baptiste Boin, Kaiping Chen, Ahmed Cherif, Skanda Shridhar. The Impact of Augmented Reality
on Art Engagement: Liking, Impression of Learning, and Distraction 153-171. [Crossref]
289. Glenn Taylor, Anthony Deschamps, Alyssa Tanaka, Denise Nicholson, Gerd Bruder, Gregory Welch, Francisco Guido-
Sanz. Augmented Reality for Tactical Combat Casualty Care Training 227-239. [Crossref]
290. Prateek Jain, Adrienne Hall-Phillips, Soussan Djamasbi. Effect of Social Media Product Reviews on Buying Decision
When Presented in Augmented Reality 313-326. [Crossref]
291. Yongjun Kweon, Sunmyeong Kim, Byounghyuk Yoon, Taeyang Jo, Changhoon Park. Implementation of Educational
Drum Contents Using Mixed Reality and Virtual Reality 296-303. [Crossref]
292. Sarah Lehman, Jenna Graves, Carlene Mcaleer, Tania Giovannetti, Chiu C. Tan. A Mobile Augmented Reality Game to
Encourage Hydration in the Elderly 98-107. [Crossref]
293. Angelo Croatti, Alessandro Ricci. A Model and Platform for Building Agent-Based Pervasive Mixed Reality Systems
127-139. [Crossref]
294. Angelo Croatti, Alessandro Ricci. Developing Agent-Based Pervasive Mixed Reality Systems: The MiRAgE Framework
301-304. [Crossref]
295. Fernanda Herrera, Jeremy Bailenson. Virtual and Augmented Reality Interfaces 1-6. [Crossref]
296. Siriwan Kajornkasirat, Jirapond Muangprathub, Naphatsawat Rachpibool, Nitikorn Phomnui. Real-Time Analytics and
Visualization: Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever Epidemic Applying Mobile Augmented Reality 735-742. [Crossref]
297. Marcelo de Paiva Guimarães, Bruno Carvalho Alves, Rafael Serapilha Durelli, Rita de F. R. Guimarães, Diego Colombo
Dias. An Approach to Developing Learning Objects with Augmented Reality Content 757-774. [Crossref]
298. Tobias Langner, Philipp Brune, Alexander Fischer, Tobias Klinke. Medienkonvergenz managen: Wahrnehmungs- und
Wirkungspfade der Kommunikation antizipieren 21-51. [Crossref]
299. Isabel Cristina Siqueira da Silva. Mixed Reality and Immersive Data Visualization 1-8. [Crossref]
300. Shafaq Irshad, Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli, Nur Intan Adhani Muhamad Nazri, Siti Rohkmah binti Mohd Shukri,
Yusoff Omar. Measuring User Experience of Mobile Augmented Reality Systems Through Non-instrumental Quality
Attributes 349-357. [Crossref]
301. Nur Intan Adhani Muhamad Nazri, Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli, Shafaq Irshad. Exploratory Study on Multimodal
Information Presentation for Mobile AR Application 358-369. [Crossref]
302. İpek Ohri, İrem Öge, Bora Orkun, Murat Yilmaz, Eray Tuzun, Paul Clarke, Rory V. O’Connor. Adopting Augmented
Reality for the Purpose of Software Development Process Training and Improvement: An Exploration 195-206. [Crossref]
303. Sonja Hammerschmid. Developing and Testing of a Virtual and Augmented Reality Maturity Model 279-288. [Crossref]
304. Christian Bokhove, Alison Clark-Wilson, Marios Pittalis. Augmenting Mathematics with Mobile Technology 131-149.
[Crossref]
305. Xiaodong Wei, Dongqiao Guo, Dongdong Weng. A Study of Preschool Instructional Design Based on Augmented Reality
Games 106-113. [Crossref]
306. Xiaodong Wei, Dongqiao Guo, Dongdong Weng. Improving Authentic Learning by AR-Based Simulator 124-134.
[Crossref]
307. Jan Guhl, Johannes Hügle, Jörg Krüger. 2018. Enabling Human-Robot-Interaction via Virtual and Augmented Reality in
Distributed Control Systems. Procedia CIRP 76, 167-170. [Crossref]
308. Sebastian Blankemeyer, Rolf Wiemann, Lukas Posniak, Christoph Pregizer, Annika Raatz. 2018. Intuitive Robot
Programming Using Augmented Reality. Procedia CIRP 76, 155-160. [Crossref]
309. Rita Layona, Budi Yulianto, Yovita Tunardi. 2018. Web based Augmented Reality for Human Body Anatomy Learning.
Procedia Computer Science 135, 457-464. [Crossref]
310. Yu-Che Huang, Ting-Ting Wu, Yueh-Ming Huang, Frode Eika Sandnes. Exploring Learning Behavior Transformation
Patterns in an AR English System: A Study of Gender Differences 433-442. [Crossref]
311. Yi-Cheng Liao, Tao-Hua Wang, Hao-Chiang Koong Lin, Kuan-Yu Lin. Augmented Reality Applied to Smartphones and
Wearable Devices - Virtual Furniture Simulation System 473-481. [Crossref]
312. Mayra Donaji Barrera Machuca, Winyu Chinthammit, Weidong Huang. Usability of Information Seeking Tools in 3D
Mobile Interaction with Public Displays 16-23. [Crossref]
313. Nicola Liberati. Achieving a Self-Satisfied Intimate Life Through Computer Technologies? 233-247. [Crossref]
314. Åsa Fast-Berglund, Liang Gong, Dan Li. 2018. Testing and validating Extended Reality (xR) technologies in
manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing 25, 31-38. [Crossref]
315. Hendra Pradibta, Indra Dharma Wijaya, Ferdian Ronilaya, Usman Nurhasan. 2018. The evaluation on a mobile augmented
reality application as therapy media. MATEC Web of Conferences 197, 15004. [Crossref]
316. Qiu Shen, Juanjuan Cai, Linfeng Liu, Haojie Liu, Tong Chen, Long Ye, Zhan Ma. CodedVision: Towards Joint Image
Understanding and Compression via End-to-End Learning 3-14. [Crossref]
317. Vlasios Kasapakis, Damianos Gavalas, Dzardanova Elena. Robust Outdoors Marker-Based Augmented Reality Applications:
Mitigating the Effect of Lighting Sensitivity 423-431. [Crossref]
318. Romain Terrier, Ferran Argelaguet, Jean-Marie Normand, Maud Marchal. Evaluation of AR Inconsistencies on AR
Placement Tasks: A VR Simulation Study 190-210. [Crossref]
319. Francisco del Cerro Velázquez, Ginés Morales Méndez. 2018. Augmented Reality and Mobile Devices: A Binominal
Methodological Resource for Inclusive Education (SDG 4). An Example in Secondary Education. Sustainability 10:10,
3446. [Crossref]
320. H. M. Kehr, M. Strasser, A. Paulus. Motivation und Volition im Beruf und am Arbeitsplatz 593-614. [Crossref]
321. George Koutromanos, Filippos Tzortzoglou, Alivisos Sofos. Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Game for Environmental
Education: “Save Elli, Save the Environment” 231-241. [Crossref]
322. Ramy Hammady, Minhua Ma, Anna Powell. User Experience of Markerless Augmented Reality Applications in Cultural
Heritage Museums: ‘MuseumEye’ as a Case Study 349-369. [Crossref]
323. Saverio Iacono, Daniele Zolezzi, Gianni Vercelli. Virtual Reality Arcade Game in Game-Based Learning for Cultural
Heritage 383-391. [Crossref]
324. Sandy Engelhardt, Raffaele De Simone, Peter M. Full, Matthias Karck, Ivo Wolf. Improving Surgical Training Phantoms
by Hyperrealism: Deep Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation from Real Surgeries 747-755. [Crossref]
325. Zois Koukopoulos, Dimitrios Koukopoulos. Usage Scenarios and Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Social Services for
Libraries 134-141. [Crossref]
326. Shohei Mori, Hideo Saito. 2018. An overview of augmented visualization: observing the real world as desired. APSIPA
Transactions on Signal and Information Processing 7. . [Crossref]
327. Finsa Nurpandi, Agung Gumelar. 2018. Augmented Reality Chemical Reaction with User-Centered Design. MATEC
Web of Conferences 218, 04012. [Crossref]
328. Kathrin Nuelle, Sabrina Bringeland, Svenja Tappe, Barbara Deml, Tobias Ortmaier. 23, 169. [Crossref]
329. Inga Saboia, Cláudia Pernencar, Mário Varinhos. 2018. Augmented Reality and nutrition field: A literature review study.
Procedia Computer Science 138, 105-112. [Crossref]
330. Jon McCormack, Jonathan C. Roberts, Benjamin Bach, Carla Dal Sasso Freitas, Takayuki Itoh, Christophe Hurter, Kim
Marriott. Multisensory Immersive Analytics 57-94. [Crossref]
331. Marc Parveau, Mehdi Adda. 2018. 3iVClass: a new classification method for Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Realities.
Procedia Computer Science 141, 263. [Crossref]
332. Reiner Anderl. Virtuelle Produktentstehung 2012-2028. [Crossref]
333. Anabela Marto, A Augusto Sousa. 2018. Mobile AR Performance Issues in a Cultural Heritage Environment. International
Journal of Creative Interfaces and Computer Graphics 9:1, 15-31. [Crossref]
334. Tilanka Chandrasekera, So-Yeon Yoon. 2018. The Effect of Augmented and Virtual Reality Interfaces in the Creative
Design Process. International Journal of Virtual and Augmented Reality 2:1, 1-13. [Crossref]
335. Mohammad Alahmadi, Jie Yang. Towards Efficient Mobile Augmented Reality in Indoor Environments 106-122.
[Crossref]
336. Mohammad Al Jaafreh, Majed Alowaidi, Hussein Al Osman, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik. Multimodal Systems, Experiences,
and Communications: A Review Toward the Tactile Internet Vision 191-220. [Crossref]
337. Zeynep Gecu-Parmaksiz, Ömer Delialioğlu. 2018. The effect of augmented reality activities on improving preschool
children’s spatial skills. Interactive Learning Environments 1. [Crossref]
338. Shao-Chen Chang, Ting-Chia Hsu, Yen-Ni Chen, Morris Siu-yung Jong. 2018. The effects of spherical video-based
virtual reality implementation on students’ natural science learning effectiveness. Interactive Learning Environments 1.
[Crossref]
339. Souad Rabah, Ahlem Assila, Elio Khouri, Florian Maier, Fakreddine Ababsa, Valéry bourny, Paul Maier, Frédéric Mérienne.
2018. Towards improving the future of manufacturing through digital twin and augmented reality technologies. Procedia
Manufacturing 17, 460-467. [Crossref]
340. Adrian Iftene, Diana Trandabăț. 2018. Enhancing the Attractiveness of Learning through Augmented Reality. Procedia
Computer Science 126, 166-175. [Crossref]
341. Hyeweon Kim, Jeongmin Yu. Personalized Heritage Museum Guide for Married Immigrant Women 224-235. [Crossref]
342. José Miguel Mota, Iván Ruiz-Rube, Juan Manuel Dodero, Inmaculada Arnedillo-Sánchez. 2018. Augmented reality mobile
app development for all. Computers & Electrical Engineering 65, 250-260. [Crossref]
343. Beverley Hood. Hybrid to Simulated Invention 223-231. [Crossref]
344. Néill O’Dwyer, Jan Ondřej, Rafael Pagés, Konstantinos Amplianitis, Aljoša Smolić. Jonathan Swift: Augmented Reality
Application for Trinity Library’s Long Room 348-351. [Crossref]
345. Erkan Özdemir, Serkan Kılıç. Augmented Reality 54-71. [Crossref]
346. Cristina Portalés, Sergio Casas, Pau Alonso-Monasterio, María José Viñals. Multi-Dimensional Acquisition,
Representation, and Interaction of Cultural Heritage Tangible Assets 72-95. [Crossref]
347. Miguel Nuno Pereira, Miguel Pazos Otón, José M. Cotos, Paula Cristina Remoaldo. Applying an Augmented Reality Tool
to the Camino de Santiago in Portugal 120-139. [Crossref]
348. Mauro Figueiredo, João Pedro Bernardes, José I. J. Rodrigues, César Gonçalves. A Framework Supported by Modeling and
Virtual/Augmented Reality for the Preservation and Dynamization of Archeological-Historical Sites 215-227. [Crossref]
349. Utku Köse. Optimization Scenarios for Open Source Software Used in E-Learning Activities 102-123. [Crossref]
350. Martin Eckert, Julia S. Volmerg, Christoph M. Friedrich. 2018. Review of Augmented Reality in Medicine (Preprint).
JMIR mHealth and uHealth . [Crossref]
351. Christopher Schlick, Ralph Bruder, Holger Luczak. Ergonomische Gestaltung 417-549. [Crossref]
352. Chin-Hung Teng, Jr-Yi Chen, Zhi-Hong Chen. 2017. Impact of Augmented Reality on Programming Language
Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17, 073563311770610. [Crossref]
353. İlyas Akkuş, Uğur Özhan. 2017. Matematik ve Geometri Eğitiminde Artırılmış Gerçeklik Uygulamaları. İnönü Üniversitesi
Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 4:8, 19-34. [Crossref]
354. Sameer Mittal, Muztoba Ahmad Khan, David Romero, Thorsten Wuest. 2017. Smart manufacturing: Characteristics,
technologies and enabling factors. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering
Manufacture 65, 095440541773654. [Crossref]
355. Magdalena Węgrzyn, Albina Mościcka. 2017. CityGuideTour Toruń – tourist application using augmented reality. Geodesy
and Cartography 66:2. . [Crossref]
356. Tzong-Hann Wu, Feng Wu, Ci-Jyun Liang, Yi-Fen Li, Ching-Mei Tseng, Shih-Chung Kang. 2017. A virtual reality
tool for training in global engineering collaboration. Universal Access in the Information Society 105. . [Crossref]
357. Shohei Mori, Hideo Saito. Augmented visualization: Observing as desired 351-356. [Crossref]
358. Y. H. Su, C. F. Liao, C. H. Ko, S. L. Cheng, K. Y. Young. An AR-based manipulation system for industrial robots
1282-1285. [Crossref]
359. Wei Guo, Yaofeng Xue, Huali Sun, Weiyun Chen, Shengna Long. Utilizing Augmented Reality to Support Students'
Learning in Popular Science Courses 311-315. [Crossref]
360. Pei-Yu Lin, Bin You, Xiaoyong Lu. 2017. Video exhibition with adjustable augmented reality system based on temporal
psycho-visual modulation. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing 2017:1. . [Crossref]
361. Boping Zhang. 2017. Design of mobile augmented reality game based on image recognition. EURASIP Journal on Image
and Video Processing 2017:1. . [Crossref]
362. A. Perruisseau-Carrier, N. Bahlouli, G. Bierry, P. Vernet, S. Facca, P. Liverneaux. 2017. Comparison between isotropic
linear-elastic law and isotropic hyperelastic law in the finite element modeling of the brachial plexus. Annales de Chirurgie
Plastique Esthétique 62:6, 664-668. [Crossref]
363. Daniel Lima Gomes, Paulo Roberto Jansen dos Reis, Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva, Aristófanes Corrêa Silva, Geraldo Braz,
Antônio Sérgio de Araújo, Marcelo Gattass. 2017. Semi-automatic methodology for augmented panorama development in
industrial outdoor environments. Advances in Engineering Software 114, 282-294. [Crossref]
364. Changwon Jang, Kiseung Bang, Seokil Moon, Jonghyun Kim, Seungjae Lee, Byoungho Lee. 2017. Retinal 3D. ACM
Transactions on Graphics 36:6, 1-13. [Crossref]
365. Gala Yadgar, Roman Shor. 2017. Experience from Two Years of Visualizing Flash with SSDPlayer. ACM Transactions
on Storage 13:4, 1-24. [Crossref]
366. Yu-Cheng Chien, Yen-Ning Su, Ting-Ting Wu, Yueh-Min Huang. 2017. Enhancing students’ botanical learning by
using augmented reality. Universal Access in the Information Society 37. . [Crossref]
367. Ting-Chia Hsu. 2017. Effects of gender and different augmented reality learning systems on English vocabulary learning
of elementary school students. Universal Access in the Information Society 8. . [Crossref]
368. Chien-Hsu Chen, Chun-Yen Huang, Yin-Yu Chou. 2017. Effects of augmented reality-based multidimensional concept
maps on students’ learning achievement, motivation and acceptance. Universal Access in the Information Society 45. .
[Crossref]
369. Christian Moro, Zane Štromberga, Athanasios Raikos, Allan Stirling. 2017. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented
reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education 10:6, 549-559. [Crossref]
370. Alastair van Heerden, Mark Tomlinson, Sarah Skeen, Charles Parry, Kendal Bryant, Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus. 2017.
Innovation at the Intersection of Alcohol and HIV Research. AIDS and Behavior 21:S2, 274-278. [Crossref]
371. Philipp A. Rauschnabel, Alexander Rossmann, M. Claudia tom Dieck. 2017. An adoption framework for mobile augmented
reality games: The case of Pokémon Go. Computers in Human Behavior 76, 276-286. [Crossref]
372. Scott G. Dacko. 2017. Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps. Technological Forecasting
and Social Change 124, 243-256. [Crossref]
373. Alexandra Rese, Daniel Baier, Andreas Geyer-Schulz, Stefanie Schreiber. 2017. How augmented reality apps are accepted
by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 124, 306-319.
[Crossref]
374. Itai Dabran, Tzoof Avny, Eytan Singher, Haim Ben Danan. Augmented reality speech recognition for the hearing impaired
1-4. [Crossref]
375. Sardjoeni Moedjiono, Aries Kusdaryono, Nurcahyadi. Media Interactive Learning and biology subjects implementation
with augmented reality application 1-6. [Crossref]
376. Myungjin Cho, Howon Lee, Hyun-Ho Choi, Bahram Javidi. 2017. A Three-Dimensional Image Transmission Using
In-Network Computation in Wireless Multi-Camera Networks. IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 5:6, 445-452.
[Crossref]
377. Jose Guedes dos Santos, Joao Paulo Silva do Monte Lima. 3D Object Tracking in RGB-D Images Using Particle Swarm
Optimization 107-115. [Crossref]
378. Marcel Santos, Joao Marcelo Teixeira, Lucas Silva Figueiredo, Veronica Teichrieb, Cristiano Araujo. Analyzing AR
Viewing Experience through Analytics Heat Maps for Augmented Content 137-145. [Crossref]
379. Arthur Silva Bastos, Renata Faria Gomes, Clemilson Costa dos Santos, Jose Gilvan Rodrigues Maia. Assessing the
Experience of Immersion in Electronic Games 146-154. [Crossref]
380. Marco Aurelio Pellens, Marcelo da Silva Hounsell, Andre Tavares da Silva. Augmented Reality and Serious Games: A
Systematic Literature Mapping 227-235. [Crossref]
381. 이이이. 2017. The Effects of Augmented Reality based Guiding Inquiry Intervention on Science of Students with Learning
Disabilities. The Journal of Inclusive Education 12:2, 251-271. [Crossref]
382. Xiaoling Wang, Corné van Elzakker, Menno-Jan Kraak. 2017. Conceptual Design of a Mobile Application for Geography
Fieldwork Learning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 6:11, 355. [Crossref]
383. Ana Regina Mizrahy Cupershmid, Lorena Claudia de Souza Moreira, Fernanda Almeida Machado, Paula Pontes Mota,
Regina Coeli Ruschel. 123DMOAI: Realidade Aumentada a partir de fotogrametria digital 464-471. [Crossref]
384. Xiaoyu Chen, Ran Jin. 2017. Statistical modeling for visualization evaluation through data fusion. Applied Ergonomics 65,
551-561. [Crossref]
385. Chan Vei Siang, Muhammad Ismail Mat Isham, Farhan Mohamed, Yusman Azimi Yusoff, Mohd Khalid Mokhtar, Bazli
Tomi, Ali Selamat. Interactive holographic application using augmented reality EduCard and 3D holographic pyramid for
interactive and immersive learning 73-78. [Crossref]
386. Robin Hanson, William Falkenström, Mikael Miettinen. 2017. Augmented reality as a means of conveying picking
information in kit preparation for mixed-model assembly. Computers & Industrial Engineering 113, 570-575. [Crossref]
387. Shuangning Ning, Xinzhu Sang, Duo Chen. Markerless client-server augmented reality system with natural features 25.
[Crossref]
388. Bo Pang, Xinzhu Sang, Shujun Xing, Kuiru Wang, Chongxiu Yu, Duo Chen, Xunbo Yu, Binbin Yan. Augmented reality
glass-free three-dimensional display with the stereo camera 32. [Crossref]
389. Gabriel Henrique de Almeida Pereira, Kristin Stock, Luciene Stamato Delazari, Jorge Antonio Silva Centeno. 2017.
Augmented Reality and Maps: New Possibilities for Engaging with Geographic Data. The Cartographic Journal 54:4,
313-321. [Crossref]
390. Francesco Ferrise, Serena Graziosi, Monica Bordegoni. 2017. Prototyping strategies for multisensory product experience
engineering. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 28:7, 1695-1707. [Crossref]
391. Trinette Wright, Sandrine de Ribaupierre, Roy Eagleson. 2017. Design and evaluation of an augmented reality simulator
using leap motion. Healthcare Technology Letters 4:5, 210-215. [Crossref]
392. Sarah M. Lehman, Chiu C. Tan. PrivacyManager: An access control framework for mobile augmented reality applications
1-9. [Crossref]
393. A. Mesarosova, M. Ferrer Hernandez, P. Mesaros, M. Behun. Mixing augmented reality and EEG technology to create
an unique learning tool for construction process 1-7. [Crossref]
394. Mohammed A. Al-Zoube. Web-Based Augmented Reality with Natural Feature Tracking and Advanced Rendering
320-326. [Crossref]
395. Hendra Pradibta, Indra Dharma Wijaya. Designing AR daily prayers for children with ASD 100-103. [Crossref]
396. Albert A. Cervera-Uribe. [POSTER] The Augmented Library: An Approach for Improving Users Awareness in a Campus
Library 15-19. [Crossref]
397. Andrea Schankin, Daniel Reichert, Matthias Berning, Michael Beigl. [POSTER] The Impact of the Frame of Reference
on Attention Shifts Between Augmented Reality and Real-World Environment 25-30. [Crossref]
398. Jeffrey Goderie, Rustam Alashrafov, Pieter Jockin, Lu Liu, Xin Liu, Marina A. Cidota, Stephan G. Lukosch. [POSTER]
ChiroChroma: An Augmented Reality Game for the Assessment of Hand Motor Functionality 115-120. [Crossref]
399. Manuela Chessa, Fabio Solari. [POSTER] Walking in Augmented Reality: An Experimental Evaluation by Playing with
a Virtual Hopscotch 143-148. [Crossref]
400. Marina A. Cidota, Stephan G. Lukosch, Paulina J.M. Bank, P. W. Ouwehand. Towards Engaging Upper Extremity Motor
Dysfunction Assessment Using Augmented Reality Games 275-278. [Crossref]
401. Joonhyun Choi, Boram Yoon, Choongho Jung, Woontack Woo. ARClassNote: Augmented Reality Based Remote
Education Solution with Tag Recognition and Shared Hand-Written Note 303-309. [Crossref]
402. Long Chen, Thomas W Day, Wen Tang, Nigel W John. Recent Developments and Future Challenges in Medical Mixed
Reality 123-135. [Crossref]
403. Christian A. Wiesner, Mike Ruf, Demet Sirim, Gudrun Klinker. 3D-FRC: Depiction of the future road course in the
Head-Up-Display 136-143. [Crossref]
404. Marina A. Cidota, Paulina J. M. Bank, P. W. Ouwehand, Stephan G. Lukosch. Assessing Upper Extremity Motor
Dysfunction Using an Augmented Reality Game 144-154. [Crossref]
405. Evangelos Alexiou, Evgeniy Upenik, Touradj Ebrahimi. Towards subjective quality assessment of point cloud imaging in
augmented reality 1-6. [Crossref]
406. Ahmed M. Siddek. Depth-level based camouflaging using RGB-D sensor 2349-2354. [Crossref]
407. Neven Drljevic, Lung Hsiang Wong, Ivica Boticki. 2017. Where Does My Augmented Reality Learning Experience
(ARLE) Belong? A Student and Teacher Perspective to Positioning ARLEs. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
10:4, 419-435. [Crossref]
408. Johanna Barbier, Patricia Kenny, Jordan Young, Jean-Marie Normand, Mark T. Keane, Muiris O'Sullivan, Anthony
Ventresque. MAAP Annotate: When archaeology meets augmented reality for annotation of megalithic art 1-8. [Crossref]
409. Jangwon Suh, Sangho Lee, Yosoon Choi. 2017. UMineAR: Mobile-Tablet-Based Abandoned Mine Hazard Site
Investigation Support System Using Augmented Reality. Minerals 7:10, 198. [Crossref]
410. Mary Alatise, Gerhard Hancke. 2017. Pose Estimation of a Mobile Robot Based on Fusion of IMU Data and Vision Data
Using an Extended Kalman Filter. Sensors 17:10, 2164. [Crossref]
411. Yelda Turkan, Rafael Radkowski, Aliye Karabulut-Ilgu, Amir H. Behzadan, An Chen. 2017. Mobile augmented reality
for teaching structural analysis. Advanced Engineering Informatics 34, 90-100. [Crossref]
412. Qiming Li, Chen Huang, Shengqing Lv, Zeyu Li, Yimin Chen, Lizhuang Ma. 2017. An Human-Computer Interactive
Augmented Reality System for Coronary Artery Diagnosis Planning and Training. Journal of Medical Systems 41:10. .
[Crossref]
413. Andrés-Marcelo Calle-Bustos, M.-Carmen Juan, Inmaculada García-García, Francisco Abad. 2017. An augmented reality
game to support therapeutic education for children with diabetes. PLOS ONE 12:9, e0184645. [Crossref]
414. Muzaffer ÖZDEMİR. 2017. Artırılmış Gerçeklik Teknolojisi ile Öğrenmeye Yönelik Deneysel Çalışmalar: Sistematik Bir
İnceleme. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 609-632. [Crossref]
415. Nishant Jain, Patricia Youngblood, Matthew Hasel, Sakti Srivastava. 2017. An augmented reality tool for learning spatial
anatomy on mobile devices. Clinical Anatomy 30:6, 736-741. [Crossref]
416. Soonchoul Kim, Moonhyun Kim, Kuinam J. Kim, Bumsuk Choi, Jinwook Chung. 2017. A scheme of AR-based
personalized interactive broadcasting service in terrestrial digital broadcasting system. Cluster Computing 20:3, 2349-2354.
[Crossref]
417. Eleonora Pantano, Alexandra Rese, Daniel Baier. 2017. Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented
reality: A two country comparison of youth markets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 38, 81-95. [Crossref]
418. Qing Hong Gao, Tao Ruan Wan, Wen Tang, Long Chen. A Stable and Accurate Marker-Less Augmented Reality
Registration Method 41-47. [Crossref]
419. Miho Nishizaki. Visualizing positive and negative affordances in infancy using mobile augmented reality 1136-1140.
[Crossref]
420. Terek Arce, Henry Fuchs, Kyla McMullen. 2017. The Effects of 3D Audio on Hologram Localization in Augmented
Reality Environments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 61:1, 2115-2119. [Crossref]
421. Wenkai Li, A. Nee, S. Ong. 2017. A State-of-the-Art Review of Augmented Reality in Engineering Analysis and
Simulation. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1:3, 17. [Crossref]
422. Shohei Mori, Momoko Maezawa, Hideo Saito. 2017. A Work Area Visualization by Multi-View Camera-Based Diminished
Reality. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1:3, 18. [Crossref]
423. , , , . 2017. Pictorial AR Tag with Hidden Multi-Level Bar-Code and Its Potential Applications. Multimodal Technologies
and Interaction 1:3, 20. [Crossref]
424. Dingtian Yan, Huosheng Hu. 2017. Application of Augmented Reality and Robotic Technology in Broadcasting: A Survey.
Robotics 6:3, 18. [Crossref]
425. Vassiliki Kokorogianni, Evi Papaioannou, Christos Kaklamanis. 2017. AUGMENTED REALITY-ASSISTED
NAVIGATION IN A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education 3:8, 251-260.
[Crossref]
426. Michał Bednarczyk. The Use of Augmented Reality in Geomatics . [Crossref]
427. Shimin Feng, Roderick Murray-Smith, Andrew Ramsay. 2017. Position stabilisation and lag reduction with Gaussian
processes in sensor fusion system for user performance improvement. International Journal of Machine Learning and
Cybernetics 8:4, 1167-1184. [Crossref]
428. Mark Yi-Cheon Yim, Shu-Chuan Chu, Paul L. Sauer. 2017. Is Augmented Reality Technology an Effective Tool for E-
commerce? An Interactivity and Vividness Perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing 39, 89-103. [Crossref]
429. Riri Safitri, Deska Setiawan Yusra, Denny Hermawan, Endang Ripmiatin, Winangsari Pradani. Mobile tourism application
using augmented reality 1-6. [Crossref]
430. Liang Gong, Changyang Gong, Zhao Ma, Lujie Zhao, Zhenyu Wang, Xudong Li, Xiaolong Jing, Haozhe Yang,
Chengliang Liu. Real-time human-in-the-loop remote control for a life-size traffic police robot with multiple augmented
reality aided display terminals 420-425. [Crossref]
431. Hiromu Ishio, Ryota Kimura, Masaru Miyao. Age-dependence of work efficiency enhancement in information seeking by
using see-through smart glasses 107-109. [Crossref]
432. R. Dewi Agushinta, Henny Medyawati, Ihsan Jatnika, Hustinawaty. A method of cloud and image-based tracking for
Indonesia fruit recognition 1-5. [Crossref]
433. George P. Banky, Aaron S. Blicblau. Doing it with a glass onion: Investigating affordances provided by a head-mounted
augmented reality immersive device for the real-time online supervision of experimental learning 1-6. [Crossref]
434. Ulises Zaldivar-Colado, Samir Garbaya, Paul Tamayo-Serrano, Xiomara Zaldivar-Colado, Pierre Blazevic. A mixed reality
for virtual assembly 739-744. [Crossref]
435. Nihanth W. Cherukuru, Ronald Calhoun, Tim Scheitlin, Matt Rehme, Raghu Raj Prasanna Kumar. 2017. Atmospheric
Data Visualization in Mixed Reality. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 98:8, 1585-1592. [Crossref]
436. Lee, Dong Han. 2017. A development plan for a screen English learning system through 3D augmented reality. STEM
Journal 18:3, 99-117. [Crossref]
437. Daisuke Mitsuno, Koichi Ueda, Tomoki Itamiya, Takashi Nuri, Yuki Otsuki. 2017. Intraoperative Evaluation of Body
Surface Improvement by an Augmented Reality System That a Clinician Can Modify. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Global Open 5:8, e1432. [Crossref]
438. Barbara Keller, Michael Möhring, Rainer Schmidt. More than a technical feature 68-83. [Crossref]
439. Hannu Salmi, Helena Thuneberg, Mari-Pauliina Vainikainen. 2017. Making the invisible observable by Augmented Reality
in informal science education context. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 7:3, 253-268. [Crossref]
440. Fei Liu, Stefan Seipel. 2017. On the precision of third person perspective augmented reality for target designation tasks.
Multimedia Tools and Applications 76:14, 15279-15296. [Crossref]
441. Tuomo Palonen, Heikki Hyyti, Arto Visala. 2017. Augmented Reality in Forest Machine Cabin. IFAC-PapersOnLine
50:1, 5410-5417. [Crossref]
442. Marie-Hélène Stoltz, Vaggelis Giannikas, Duncan McFarlane, James Strachan, Jumyung Um, Rengarajan Srinivasan.
2017. Augmented Reality in Warehouse Operations: Opportunities and Barriers. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50:1, 12979-12984.
[Crossref]
443. M Hari Priya, Shriram K Vasudevan. An innovative application for car engine disparity check — A novel attempt 175-180.
[Crossref]
444. Anasol Pena-Rios, Hani Hagras, Michael Gardner, Gilbert Owusu. A fuzzy logic based system for geolocated augmented
reality field service support 1-6. [Crossref]
445. Silviu Vert, Diana Andone. Zero-Programming Augmented Reality Authoring Tools for Educators: Status and
Recommendations 496-498. [Crossref]
446. M.-Carmen Juan, Mauricio Loachamin-Valencia, Inmaculada Garcia-Garcia, Jose Manuel Melchor, Josep Benedito.
ARCoins. An Augmented Reality App for Learning about Numismatics 466-468. [Crossref]
447. Tharrenos Bratitsis, Pinelopi Bardanika, Michalis Ioannou. Science Education and Augmented Reality Content: The Case
of the Water Circle 485-489. [Crossref]
448. Jeff Burke. Browsing an Augmented Reality with Named Data Networking 1-9. [Crossref]
449. Sasithorn Chookaew, Suppachai Howimanporn, Warin Sootkaneung, Charoenchai Wongwatkit. Motivating Pre-service
Teachers with Augmented Reality to Developing Instructional Materials through Project-Based Learning Approach
780-784. [Crossref]
450. Rui Manuel Agostinho Gaspar, José Pedro Fernandes da Silva Coelho, Glória Maria Lourenço Bastos. 2017. Prazerosa –
Interactive Reading Chair. International Journal of Creative Interfaces and Computer Graphics 8:2, 1-12. [Crossref]
451. Zeenat AlKassim, Nader Mohamed. 2017. Sixth Sense Technology. International Journal of Virtual and Augmented Reality
1:2, 18-41. [Crossref]
452. Peter Wozniak, Nicolas Javahiraly, Dan Curticapean. Real-time augmented reality overlay for an energy-efficient car study
103350B. [Crossref]
453. Chung-Hua Chu, Shu-Lin Wang, Bi-Chi Tseng. 2017. Mobile navigation services with augmented reality. IEEJ
Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering 12, S95-S103. [Crossref]
454. Rabia Meryem Yilmaz, Yuksel Goktas. 2017. Using augmented reality technology in storytelling activities: examining
elementary students’ narrative skill and creativity. Virtual Reality 21:2, 75-89. [Crossref]
455. Zhutian Chen, Yifang Wang, Tianchen Sun, Xiang Gao, Wei Chen, Zhigeng Pan, Huamin Qu, Yingcai Wu. 2017.
Exploring the design space of immersive urban analytics. Visual Informatics 1:2, 132-142. [Crossref]
456. Jun Lee, Kyoung-Sook Kim, Hirotaka Ogawa, Yongjin Kwon. MixedWalk: Explore Ahead before Stepping in Mobile
Augmented Reality Services 62-69. [Crossref]
457. Rafael Sotelo, Jose Joskowicz, Nicolas Rondan. Experiences on hybrid television and augmented reality on ISDB-T 1-5.
[Crossref]
458. Michael Tanaya, KouKeng Yang, Taran Christensen, Shen Li, Michael O'Keefe, James Fridley, Kelvin Sung. A Framework
for analyzing AR/VR Collaborations: An initial result 111-116. [Crossref]
459. Ananda Maiti, Andrew D. Maxwell, Alexander A. Kist. Using marker based augmented reality and natural user interface
for interactive remote experiments 159-164. [Crossref]
460. Tristan Braud, Farshid Hassani Bijarbooneh, Dimitris Chatzopoulos, Pan Hui. Future Networking Challenges: The Case
of Mobile Augmented Reality 1796-1807. [Crossref]
461. Carlos Bermejo, Zhanpeng Huang, Tristan Braud, Pan Hui. When Augmented Reality meets Big Data 169-174. [Crossref]
462. Xin Su, Thomas Maugey, Christine Guillemot. 2017. Rate-Distortion Optimized Graph-Based Representation for
Multiview Images With Complex Camera Configurations. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 26:6, 2644-2655.
[Crossref]
463. Shinya Matsutomo, Tomohisa Manabe, Vlatko Cingoski, So Noguchi. 2017. A Computer Aided Education System Based
on Augmented Reality by Immersion to 3-D Magnetic Field. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 53:6, 1-4. [Crossref]
464. Jens Grubert, Tobias Langlotz, Stefanie Zollmann, Holger Regenbrecht. 2017. Towards Pervasive Augmented Reality:
Context-Awareness in Augmented Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23:6, 1706-1724.
[Crossref]
465. Reyes Montenegro, Lilia Munoz. Improved teaching and conservation of natural sites through augmented reality 1-6.
[Crossref]
466. Anabela G. R. Marto, A. Augusto de Sousa, Alexandrino Jose Marques Goncalves. DinofelisAR demo augmented reality
based on natural features 1-6. [Crossref]
467. Jose Duarte Cardoso Gomes, Cristina Maria Cardoso Gomes, Lidia Oliveira. Augmented reality in formal learning
environments: Intervention in a visual education textbook 1-6. [Crossref]
468. B. Borusiak, B. Pierański. 3. Augmented reality in retailing 55-64. [Crossref]
469. E. Horská, J. Paluchová, P. Šimončič, J. Berčík. 4. Consumer food related applications: food retail sector and services
65-86. [Crossref]
470. Rima Viršilaitė, Vida Davidavičienė. 2017. Augmented Reality Technology: Application Fields and Communicative
Aspects. Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis 9:2, 258-265. [Crossref]
471. Gabriel Evans, Jack Miller, Mariangely Iglesias Pena, Anastacia MacAllister, Eliot Winer. Evaluating the Microsoft
HoloLens through an augmented reality assembly application 101970V. [Crossref]
472. Carlos Carbonell Carrera, Luis Alberto Bermejo Asensio. 2017. Augmented reality as a digital teaching environment to
develop spatial thinking. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 44:3, 259-270. [Crossref]
473. Stéphanie Gauttier. 2017. Vers une “entreprise augmentée” : De nouveaux challenges pour la recherche en management
et systèmes d’information. Terminal :120. . [Crossref]
474. Ryan P. Spicer, Stephen M. Russell, Evan Suma Rosenberg. The mixed reality of things: emerging challenges for human-
information interaction 102070A. [Crossref]
475. Eugene Ch’ng, Dew Harrison, Samantha Moore. 2017. Shift-Life Interactive Art: Mixed-Reality Artificial Ecosystem
Simulation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 26:2, 157-181. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
476. Zeynep Taçgın, Ahmet Arslan. 2017. The perceptions of CEIT postgraduate students regarding reality concepts:
Augmented, virtual, mixed and mirror reality. Education and Information Technologies 22:3, 1179-1194. [Crossref]
477. Alessandro Ceruti, Alfredo Liverani, Tiziano Bombardi. 2017. Augmented vision and interactive monitoring in 3D printing
process. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 11:2, 385-395. [Crossref]
478. Vicente Raja, Paco Calvo. 2017. Augmented reality: An ecological blend. Cognitive Systems Research 42, 58-72. [Crossref]
479. Brian R. Kent. 2017. Spherical Panoramas for Astrophysical Data Visualization. Publications of the Astronomical Society of
the Pacific 129:975, 058004. [Crossref]
480. Steven C Isley, Robert Ketcham, Douglas J Arent. 2017. Using augmented reality to inform consumer choice and lower
carbon footprints. Environmental Research Letters 12:6, 064002. [Crossref]
481. Liang-Yi Chung, Sheng-Min Hsieh. Using graphic digital materials in language learning 295-298. [Crossref]
482. Nurhazarifah Che Hashim, Nazatul Aini Abdul Majid, Haslina Arshad, Siti Soleha Muhammad Nizam, Haekal Mozzia
Putra. Mobile augmented reality application for early Arabic language education-: ARabic 761-766. [Crossref]
483. Rabia M. Yilmaz, Sevda Kucuk, Yuksel Goktas. 2017. Are augmented reality picture books magic or real for preschool
children aged five to six?. British Journal of Educational Technology 48:3, 824-841. [Crossref]
484. , , . 2017. A Study on Immersion and Presence of a Portable Hand Haptic System for Immersive Virtual Reality. Sensors
17:5, 1141. [Crossref]
485. Ali Karji, Asregedew Woldesenbet, Saeed Rokooei. Integration of Augmented Reality, Building Information Modeling,
and Image Processing in Construction Management: A Content Analysis 983-992. [Crossref]
486. Sanni Siltanen, Maiju Aikala, Sari Järvinen, Ville Valjus. 2017. Augmented Reality Enriches Print Media and Revitalizes
Media Business. Computers in Entertainment 15:3, 1-15. [Crossref]
487. Athanasios Vourvopoulos, Sergi Bermudez i Badia, Fotis Liarokapis. 2017. EEG correlates of video game experience and
user profile in motor-imagery-based brain–computer interaction. The Visual Computer 33:4, 533-546. [Crossref]
488. Hamza Ghandorh, Justin Mackenzie, Roy Eagleson, Sandrine de Ribaupierre. Development of augmented reality training
simulator systems for neurosurgery using model-driven software engineering 1-6. [Crossref]
489. M. Umer, Bilal Nasir, Junaid A. Khan, Shahrukh Ali, Sohaib Ahmed. MAPILS: Mobile augmented reality plant inquiry
learning system 1443-1449. [Crossref]
490. Angelo Croatti, Alessandro Ricci. Towards the Web of Augmented Things 80-87. [Crossref]
491. Byeongki Jeong, Janghyeok Yoon. 2017. Competitive Intelligence Analysis of Augmented Reality Technology Using Patent
Information. Sustainability 9:4, 497. [Crossref]
492. Isabel Pedersen, Nathan Gale, Pejman Mirza-Babaei, Samantha Reid. 2017. More than Meets the Eye. Journal on
Computing and Cultural Heritage 10:2, 1-15. [Crossref]
493. Gulcin Kubat. 2017. The mobile future of university libraries and an analysis of the Turkish case. Information and Learning
Science 118:3/4, 120-140. [Crossref]
494. Nick Hedley. Augmented Reality 1-13. [Crossref]
495. Juan Cristobal Garcia-Sanchez. 2017. Augmenting Reality in Books: A Tool for Enhancing Reading Skills in Mexico.
Publishing Research Quarterly 33:1, 19-27. [Crossref]
496. Yang Yu, Yingchun Guo, Ruili Wang, Susha Yin, Ming Yu. 2017. Registration Based on ORB and FREAK Features for
Augmented Reality Systems. Transactions of Tianjin University 23:2, 192-200. [Crossref]
497. Ting-Chia Hsu. 2017. Learning English with Augmented Reality: Do learning styles matter?. Computers & Education
106, 137-149. [Crossref]
498. Michael Schneider, Jason Rambach, Didier Stricker. Augmented reality based on edge computing using the example of
remote live support 1277-1282. [Crossref]
499. Cate C. Smith, David F. Cihak, Byungkeon Kim, Don D. McMahon, Rachel Wright. 2017. Examining Augmented
Reality to Improve Navigation Skills in Postsecondary Students With Intellectual Disability. Journal of Special Education
Technology 32:1, 3-11. [Crossref]
500. Huan Deng, Han-Le Zhang, Min-Yang He, Qiong-Hua Wang. Augmented reality 3D display based on integral imaging
1012608. [Crossref]
501. Jonny Collins, Holger Regenbrecht, Tobias Langlotz. 2017. Visual Coherence in Mixed Reality: A Systematic Enquiry.
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 26:1, 16-41. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
502. Daniel Petras, Alan K Jarmusch, Pieter C Dorrestein. 2017. From single cells to our planet—recent advances in using mass
spectrometry for spatially resolved metabolomics. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 36, 24-31. [Crossref]
503. Dušan Tatić, Bojan Tešić. 2017. The application of augmented reality technologies for the improvement of occupational
safety in an industrial environment. Computers in Industry 85, 1-10. [Crossref]
504. Octavian Potecaşu, Alexandra Bucur, Florin Bogdan Marin. 2017. Virtual Interactive Prototyping Based on Function-
Behavior-Structure (FBS) Approach. Advanced Materials Research 1143, 188-193. [Crossref]
505. Yiannis Georgiou, Eleni A. Kyza. 2017. The development and validation of the ARI questionnaire: An instrument for
measuring immersion in location-based augmented reality settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 98,
24-37. [Crossref]
506. Mahdi Nabiyouni, Siroberto Scerbo, Doug A. Bowman, Tobias Höllerer. 2017. Relative Effects of Real-world and Virtual-
World Latency on an Augmented Reality Training Task: An AR Simulation Experiment. Frontiers in ICT 3. . [Crossref]
507. Chi-Hsuan Chung, Chien-Hsu Chen. Augmented Reality Based Social Stories Training System for Promoting the Social
Skills of Children with Autism 495-505. [Crossref]
508. Chia-Chi Mao, Chien-Hsu Chen, Chung-Chong Sun. Impact of an Augmented Reality System on Learning for Army
Military Decision-Making Process (MDMP) Course 663-671. [Crossref]
509. Mohamed Ismail, Hamid Parsaei, Konstantinos Kakosimos. Incorporating Human Factors in Course Design: Utility of
Wearable Technologies 159-170. [Crossref]
510. Alessandro Ceruti, Leonardo Frizziero, Alfredo Liverani. Visual Aided Assembly of Scale Models with AR 727-735.
[Crossref]
511. Alessandro Ricci, Mirko Viroli, Andrea Omicini, Stefano Mariani, Angelo Croatti, Danilo Pianini. Spatial Tuples:
Augmenting Physical Reality with Tuple Spaces 121-130. [Crossref]
512. Fotis Liarokapis, Panagiotis Petridis, Daniel Andrews, Sara de Freitas. Multimodal Serious Games Technologies for
Cultural Heritage 371-392. [Crossref]
513. Marinos Ioannides, Rob Davies, Pavlos Chatzigrigoriou, Eirini Papageorgiou, Georgios Leventis, Vasiliki Nikolakopoulou,
Vasilis Athanasiou. 3D Digital Libraries and Their Contribution in the Documentation of the Past 161-199. [Crossref]
514. Kunyanuth Kularbphettong, Nutthawut Limphoemsuk. The Effective of Learning by Augmented Reality on Android
Platform 111-118. [Crossref]
515. Michael Abramovici, Mario Wolf, Matthias Neges. Graph-Based Model for Context-Aware Maintenance Assistance with
Augmented Reality and 3D Visualization 367-386. [Crossref]
516. Larissa Neuburger, Roman Egger. An Afternoon at the Museum: Through the Lens of Augmented Reality 241-254.
[Crossref]
517. Chiara Calabrese, Luciano Baresi. Outdoor Augmented Reality for Urban Design and Simulation 181-190. [Crossref]
518. ChinLun Lai, YuFang Chu. Increasing the Learning Performance via Augmented Reality Technology 58-64. [Crossref]
519. Jon Peddie. Historical Overview 59-86. [Crossref]
520. Maria Panagiotopoulou, Anastasia Stratigea. Spatial Data Management and Visualization Tools and Technologies for
Enhancing Participatory e-Planning in Smart Cities 31-57. [Crossref]
521. Adnane Jadid, Martin Koplin, Stephan Siegert, Martin Hering-Bertram, Volker Paelke, Thorsten Teschke, Helmut
Eirund. Express Yourself/City—Smart Participation Culture Technologies 175-194. [Crossref]
522. Mafalda Teles Roxo, Pedro Quelhas Brito. The Evolution of Azuma’s Augmented Reality– An Overview of 20 Years of
Research 259-266. [Crossref]
523. Kateřina Chmelařová, Čeněk Šašinka, Zdeněk Stachoň. Visualization of Environment-related Information in Augmented
Reality: Analysis of User Needs 283-292. [Crossref]
524. Jorge D. Camba, José Luis Soler, Manuel Contero. Immersive Visualization Technologies to Facilitate Multidisciplinary
Design Education 3-11. [Crossref]
525. Hansol Lee, Sangmi Chai. Flow Experience in AR Application: Perceived Reality and Perceived Naturalness 185-198.
[Crossref]
526. Fumiko Ishizawa, Tatsuo Nakajima. Guiding Human Behavior Through Alternate Reality Experience 35-47. [Crossref]
527. Jeongmin Yu, Jinwoo Jeon, Jinwoo Park, Gabyong Park, Hyung-il Kim, Woontack Woo. Geometry-Aware Interactive AR
Authoring Using a Smartphone in a Wearable AR Environment 416-424. [Crossref]
528. Jingya Li, Erik D. van der Spek, Loe Feijs, Feng Wang, Jun Hu. Augmented Reality Games for Learning: A Literature
Review 612-626. [Crossref]
529. Juan Garzón, Juan Pavón, Silvia Baldiris. Augmented Reality Applications for Education: Five Directions for Future
Research 402-414. [Crossref]
530. Satyaki Roy, Pratiti Sarkar, Surojit Dey. DyMAR: Introduction to Dynamic Marker Based Augmented Reality Using
Smartwatch 448-456. [Crossref]
531. Rafał Wojciechowski. Versatile Augmented Reality Scenes for Tangible Interaction in Real-World Environments 490-500.
[Crossref]
532. Mohammed A. Almiyad, Luke Oakden-Rayner, Amali Weerasinghe, Mark Billinghurst. Intelligent Augmented Reality
Tutoring for Physical Tasks with Medical Professionals 450-454. [Crossref]
533. Andrea Caroppo, Alessandro Leone, Pietro Siciliano, Daniele Sancarlo, Grazia D’Onofrio, Antonio Greco, Gianfranco
Borrelli, Paolo Casacci, Massimo Pistoia. Design and Evaluation of an ICT Platform for Cognitive Stimulation of
Alzheimer’s Disease Patients 106-115. [Crossref]
534. Marcelo de Paiva Guimarães, Bruno Alves, Valéria Farinazzo Martins, Luiz Soares dos Santos Baglie, José Remo
Brega, Diego Colombo Dias. Embedding Augmented Reality Applications into Learning Management Systems 585-594.
[Crossref]
535. Huy Le, Minh Nguyen. Enhancing Textbook Study Experiences with Pictorial Bar-Codes and Augmented Reality
139-150. [Crossref]
536. Qing Hong Gao, Tao Ruan Wan, Wen Tang, Long Chen, Kai Bing Zhang. An Improved Augmented Reality Registration
Method Based on Visual SLAM 11-19. [Crossref]
537. Kelvin Cheng, Mitsuru Nakazawa, Soh Masuko. MR-Shoppingu: Physical Interaction with Augmented Retail Products
Using Continuous Context Awareness 452-455. [Crossref]
538. Qiming Li, Chen Huang, Zeyu Li, Yimin Chen, Lizhuang Ma. HCI Based on Gesture Recognition in an Augmented
Reality System for Diagnosis Planning and Training 113-123. [Crossref]
539. Danny Zhu, Manuela Veloso. Virtually Adapted Reality and Algorithm Visualization for Autonomous Robots 452-464.
[Crossref]
540. Kohilah Miundy, Halimah Badioze Zaman, Aliimran Nordin. Review on Data Driven Preliminary Study Pertaining to
Assistive Digital Learning Technologies to Support Dyscalculia Learners 233-246. [Crossref]
541. Shafaq Irshad, Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli. Advances in Mobile Augmented Reality from User Experience Perspective:
A Review of Studies 466-477. [Crossref]
542. Simon Burkard, Frank Fuchs-Kittowski, Sebastian Himberger, Fabian Fischer, Stefan Pfennigschmidt. Mobile Location-
Based Augmented Reality Framework 470-483. [Crossref]
543. Christian Arnold, Martin Reckenfelderbäumer. Context-Aware Computing – Zur Integrativitätsproblematik aus Sicht der
Leistungslehre 205-229. [Crossref]
544. Joël Vogt, Edy Portmann. A Proposal for the Next Generation of Courier Delivery and Storage in the Shared Economy
119-128. [Crossref]
545. Vincent Hing, Hee Kooi Khoo. Business Card Reader with Augmented Reality Engine Integration 219-227. [Crossref]
546. Hui Ye, Ruizhi Shi, Shenghui Li, Da Li. Research on the Application Process of Mobile Augmented Reality in Printed
Product 357-365. [Crossref]
547. Rui Nóbrega, Nuno Correia. 2017. Interactive 3D content insertion in images for multimedia applications. Multimedia
Tools and Applications 76:1, 163-197. [Crossref]
548. Fabian Lorenzo Dayrit, Yuta Nakashima, Tomokazu Sato, Naokazu Yokoya. 2017. Increasing pose comprehension through
augmented reality reenactment. Multimedia Tools and Applications 76:1, 1291-1312. [Crossref]
549. M.M.L. Chang, S.K. Ong, A.Y.C. Nee. 2017. AR-guided Product Disassembly for Maintenance and Remanufacturing.
Procedia CIRP 61, 299-304. [Crossref]
550. Oscar Danielsson, Anna Syberfeldt, Rodney Brewster, Lihui Wang. 2017. Assessing Instructions in Augmented Reality
for Human-robot Collaborative Assembly by Using Demonstrators. Procedia CIRP 63, 89-94. [Crossref]
551. D. Mourtzis, V. Zogopoulos, E. Vlachou. 2017. Augmented Reality Application to Support Remote Maintenance as a
Service in the Robotics Industry. Procedia CIRP 63, 46-51. [Crossref]
552. Qian Shan, Thomas E. Doyle, Reza Samavi, Mona Al-Rei. 2017. Augmented Reality Based Brain Tumor 3D Visualization.
Procedia Computer Science 113, 400-407. [Crossref]
553. Hongyi Liu, Lihui Wang. 2017. An AR-based Worker Support System for Human-Robot Collaboration. Procedia
Manufacturing 11, 22-30. [Crossref]
554. Riccardo Masoni, Francesco Ferrise, Monica Bordegoni, Michele Gattullo, Antonio E. Uva, Michele Fiorentino, Ernesto
Carrabba, Michele Di Donato. 2017. Supporting Remote Maintenance in Industry 4.0 through Augmented Reality.
Procedia Manufacturing 11, 1296-1302. [Crossref]
555. Silvia Cacho-Elizondo, José-Domingo Lázaro Álvarez, Victor-Ernesto Garcia. Assessing the Opportunities for Virtual,
Augmented, and Diminished Reality in the Healthcare Sector 323-344. [Crossref]
556. Valarmathie Gopalan, Juliana Aida Abu Bakar, Abdul Nasir Zulkifli. A brief review of augmented reality science learning
020044. [Crossref]
557. Meng Chun Lam, Siti Soleha Muhammad Nizam, Haslina Arshad, Saidatul A’isyah Ahmad Shukri, Nurhazarifah Che
Hashim, Haekal Mozzia Putra, Rimaniza Zainal Abidin. A usability evaluation of an interactive application for halal
products using optical character recognition and augmented reality technologies 020084. [Crossref]
558. Hameedur Rahman, Haslina Arshad, Rozi Mahmud, Zainal Rasyid Mahayuddin. A framework for breast cancer
visualization using augmented reality x-ray vision technique in mobile technology 020116. [Crossref]
559. Dana Crăciun, Mădălin Bunoiu. Boosting physics education through mobile augmented reality 050003. [Crossref]
560. Dimitris Chatzopoulos, Carlos Bermejo, Zhanpeng Huang, Pan Hui. 2017. Mobile Augmented Reality Survey: From
Where We Are to Where We Go. IEEE Access 5, 6917-6950. [Crossref]
561. Anna Syberfeldt, Oscar Danielsson, Patrik Gustavsson. 2017. Augmented Reality Smart Glasses in the Smart Factory:
Product Evaluation Guidelines and Review of Available Products. IEEE Access 5, 9118-9130. [Crossref]
562. Ioana Opris, Sorina Costinas, Cristina Sorana Ionescu, Daniela Elena Gogoase Nistoran. Towards augmented reality in
power engineering 39-44. [Crossref]
563. R. G. N. Ruwanthika, P. A. D. B. M. Amarasekera, R. U. I. B. Chandrasiri, D. M. A. I. Rangana, A. Nugaliyadde, Y.
Mallawarachchi. Dynamic 3D model construction using architectural house plans 181-184. [Crossref]
564. Felicitas J. Detmer, Julian Hettig, Daniel Schindele, Martin Schostak, Christian Hansen. 2017. Virtual and Augmented
Reality Systems for Renal Interventions: A Systematic Review. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 10, 78-94.
[Crossref]
565. Thuong Hoang, Martin Reinoso, Zaher Joukhadar, Frank Vetere, David Kelly. Augmented Studio 1419-1430. [Crossref]
566. Weiquan Lu, Suresh Pillai, Kanagasuntheram Rajendran, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Ching-Chiuan Yen, Yi-Luen Ellen Do.
Virtual Interactive Human Anatomy 429-432. [Crossref]
567. Chia-Chi Mao, Chung-Chong Sun, Chien-Hsu Chen. Evaluate Learner's Acceptance of Augmented Reality Based Military
Decision Making Process Training System 73-77. [Crossref]
568. Sebastian Büttner, Henrik Mucha, Markus Funk, Thomas Kosch, Mario Aehnelt, Sebastian Robert, Carsten Röcker.
The Design Space of Augmented and Virtual Reality Applications for Assistive Environments in Manufacturing 433-440.
[Crossref]
569. Hamed Alqahtani, Manolya Kavakli. iMAP-CampUS 1-5. [Crossref]
570. Hamed Alqahtani, Manolya Kavakli. iMAP-CampUS (an Intelligent Mobile Augmented Reality Program on Campus as
a Ubiquitous System) 36-43. [Crossref]
571. Ismo Alakärppä, Elisa Jaakkola, Jani Väyrynen, Jonna Häkkilä. Using nature elements in mobile AR for education with
children 1-13. [Crossref]
572. Wataru Yamada, Kazuhiro Yamada, Hiroyuki Manabe, Daizo Ikeda. iSphere 635-643. [Crossref]
573. Kota Gushima, Hina Akasaki, Tatsuo Nakajima. Ambient bot 231-234. [Crossref]
574. Mandy Korzetz, Romina Kühn, Maria Gohlke, Uwe Aßmann. HoloFacility 336-341. [Crossref]
575. Kangsoo Kim, Gerd Bruder, Greg Welch. Exploring the effects of observed physicality conflicts on real-virtual human
interaction in augmented reality 1-7. [Crossref]
576. Alex Baldwin, Stefania Serafin, Cumhur Erkut. ScatAR 1-2. [Crossref]
577. Jean M. Angeles, Fredilyn B. Calanda, Tony Vic V. Bayon-on, Roselia C. Morco, Junnel Avestro, Mark Jade S. Corpuz.
AR Plants 43-48. [Crossref]
578. Wernhuar Tarng, Jiong-Kai Pan, Chiu-Pin Lin. 2017. Development of a Motion Sensing and Automatic Positioning
Universal Planisphere Using Augmented Reality Technology. Mobile Information Systems 2017, 1-13. [Crossref]
579. 이이 이. 2017. An Application of New Media Based on Body Part Recognition. Computer Science and Application 07:11,
1101-1106. [Crossref]
580. Christoph Noll, Ute von Jan, Ulrike Raap, Urs-Vito Albrecht. 2017. Mobile Augmented Reality as a Feature for Self-
Oriented, Blended Learning in Medicine: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 5:9, e139. [Crossref]
581. C. R. GOPALAKRISHNA MURTHY, PATIL RAHUL, DIXIT S SWAROOP, L. UJWAL, M. V. HEMANTH.
2017. IMPLEMENTATION OF AN INDOOR NAVIGATION ROBOT FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED AND NEW
VISITORS. i-manager’s Journal on Embedded Systems 6:1, 6. [Crossref]
582. Fabrício Herpich, Renan Luigi Martins Guarese, Liane Margarida Rockenbach Tarouco. 2017. A Comparative Analysis
of Augmented Reality Frameworks Aimed at the Development of Educational Applications. Creative Education 08:09,
1433-1451. [Crossref]
583. Aleksandra Krstić. 2017. Augmented and virtual reality in the media: Questioning the concept of 'immersive' journalism.
CM: Communication and Media 12:41, 81-104. [Crossref]
584. Fumio Okura, Takayuki Akaguma, Tomokazu Sato, Naokazu Yokoya. 2017. Addressing temporal inconsistency in indirect
augmented reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications 76:2, 2671-2695. [Crossref]
585. Aras Bozkurt. Augmented Reality with Mobile and Ubiquitous Learning 27-41. [Crossref]
586. Neda Shabani, Azizul Hassan. Augmented Reality for Tourism Service Promotion in Iran as an Emerging Market 116-129.
[Crossref]
587. İdil Sayımer, Banu Küçüksaraç. An Experimental Research About Using Augmented Reality in Advertising for
Measurement of Advertisement Liking and Effectiveness Level 203-227. [Crossref]
588. Heen Chen, Hanwu He, Jianqing Mo, Jinfang Li, Xian Yang. 2016. 3D registration based perception in augmented reality
environment. Cogent Engineering 3:1. . [Crossref]
589. Tomohiro Sueishi, Hiromasa Oku, Masatoshi Ishikawa. 2016. Lumipen 2: Dynamic Projection Mapping with Mirror-
Based Robust High-Speed Tracking against Illumination Changes. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 25:4,
299-321. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus] [Supplemental Material]
590. Hoshang Kolivand, Mark Billinghurst, Mohd Shahrizal Sunar. 2016. LivePhantom: Retrieving Virtual World Light Data
to Real Environments. PLOS ONE 11:12, e0166424. [Crossref]
591. Cureton Paul. Strategies for Representation (3D Models) 131-168. [Crossref]
592. Ronald T. Azuma. 2016. The Most Important Challenge Facing Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual
Environments 25:3, 234-238. [Citation] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
593. Marina Cidota, Stephan Lukosch, Dragos Datcu, Heide Lukosch. 2016. Comparing the Effect of Audio and Visual
Notifications on Workspace Awareness Using Head-Mounted Displays for Remote Collaboration in Augmented Reality.
Augmented Human Research 1:1. . [Crossref]
594. Minh Nguyen, Albert Yeap. StereoTag: A novel stereogram-marker-based approach for Augmented Reality 1059-1064.
[Crossref]
595. Timothy Garrett, Rafael Radkowski, Jeremy Sheaffer. GPU-accelerated descriptor extraction process for 3D registration
in Augmented Reality 3085-3090. [Crossref]
596. Silvino Martins, Mario Vairinhos, Sergio Eliseu, Janet Borgerson. Input system interface for image-guided surgery based
on augmented reality 1-6. [Crossref]
597. Eric Marchand, Hideaki Uchiyama, Fabien Spindler. 2016. Pose Estimation for Augmented Reality: A Hands-On Survey.
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22:12, 2633-2651. [Crossref]
598. Marc Ericson C. Santos, Arno in Wolde Lübke, Takafumi Taketomi, Goshiro Yamamoto, Ma. Mercedes T. Rodrigo,
Christian Sandor, Hirokazu Kato. 2016. Augmented reality as multimedia: the case for situated vocabulary learning.
Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 11:1. . [Crossref]
599. Kyung-In Cho, Chul-Jung Kim. 2016. The Study on the Influence of Technology Acceptance in the Traditional Markets
for Consumer Purchasing Intention: Based on Augmented Reality Technology. Journal of Distribution Science 14:12,
119-127. [Crossref]
600. Wendson de Oliveira Souza, Giovana Mira de Espindola, Alessandro Rhadamek Alves Pereira, Lucilene Antunes
Correia Marques de Sá. 2016. A REALIDADE AUMENTADA NA APRESENTAÇÃO DE PRODUTOS
CARTOGRÁFICOS. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas 22:4, 790-806. [Crossref]
601. Gabriela Barber, Marcos Lafluf. Interactive Projection Mapping: Proyecto Patrimonio ANGLO 795-801. [Crossref]
602. Fernando Vera, J. Alfredo Sánchez, Ofelia Cervantes. 2016. Enhancing User Experience in Points of Interest with
Augmented Reality. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering 8:6, 450-457. [Crossref]
603. İbrahim İLHAN, Evrim ÇELTEK. 2016. Mobile Marketing: Usage of Augmented Reality in Tourism. Gaziantep
University Journal of Social Sciences 15:24217, 581-599. [Crossref]
604. Tad T. Brunyé, Joseph M. Moran, Lindsay A. Houck, Holly A. Taylor, Caroline R. Mahoney. 2016. Registration errors in
beacon-based navigation guidance systems: Influences on path efficiency and user reliance. International Journal of Human-
Computer Studies 96, 1-11. [Crossref]
605. Aliakbar Alamdari, Venkat Krovi. Robotic Assistive Devices for Motor Disability Rehabilitation 1-14. [Crossref]
606. Insoon Jo, Im Y. Jung. 2016. Smart learning of logo detection for mobile phone applications. Multimedia Tools and
Applications 75:21, 13211-13233. [Crossref]
607. Anabel Martin-Gonzalez, Angel Chi-Poot, Victor Uc-Cetina. 2016. Usability evaluation of an augmented reality system
for teaching Euclidean vectors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 53:6, 627-636. [Crossref]
608. Rawia Frikha, Ridha Ejbali, Mourad Zaied. Handling occlusion in Augmented Reality surgical training based instrument
tracking 1-5. [Crossref]
609. Neven A. M. ElSayed, Ross T. Smith, Kim Marriott, Bruce H. Thomas. Blended UI Controls for Situated Analytics
1-8. [Crossref]
610. Zhou Rongting, Song Yiran, He Tongliang, Fahad Asmi. Applying Augmented Reality Technology to E-Learning: Science
Educational AR Products as an Example 129-133. [Crossref]
611. P. Mesaros, D. Mackova, M. Spisakova, T. Mandicak, A. Behunova. M-learning tool for modeling the building site
parameters in mixed reality environment 211-216. [Crossref]
612. Stefanie Zollmann, Christian Poglitsch, Jonathan Ventura. VISGIS: Dynamic situated visualization for geographic
information systems 1-6. [Crossref]
613. Akash Bapat, Enrique Dunn, Jan-Michael Frahm. 2016. Towards Kilo-Hertz 6-DoF Visual Tracking Using an Egocentric
Cluster of Rolling Shutter Cameras. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22:11, 2358-2367.
[Crossref]
614. Maria Rita Dionisio, Simon Kingham, Karen Banwell, Joshua Neville. 2016. Geospatial tools for Community Engagement
in the Christchurch Rebuild, New Zealand. Sustainable Cities and Society 27, 233-243. [Crossref]
615. Qichao Hou, Dewen Cheng, Qiwei Wang, Yongtian Wang. A telescope with augmented reality functions 101540O.
[Crossref]
616. Sevda Küçük, Samet Kapakin, Yüksel Göktaş. 2016. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: Effects on
achievement and cognitive load. Anatomical Sciences Education 9:5, 411-421. [Crossref]
617. Xiaolei Zhang, Yong Han, DongSheng Hao, Zhihan Lv. 2016. ARGIS-based outdoor underground pipeline information
system. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 40, 779-790. [Crossref]
618. Jorge D. Camba, Alejandro Bonnet De Leon, Jorge de la Torre, Jose Luis Saorin, Manuel Contero. Application of low-
cost 3D scanning technologies to the development of educational augmented reality content 1-6. [Crossref]
619. Jiao Wang, Dirk Soffker. Improving driving efficiency for hybrid electric vehicle with suitable interface 000928-000933.
[Crossref]
620. Xia Sheng Lee, Mohd Faris Khamidi, Zi Siang See, Tim John Lees, Changsaar Chai. Augmented reality for ndimensional
building information modelling : Contextualization, Customization and Curation 1-5. [Crossref]
621. E. Stylianidis, E. Valari, K. Smagas, A. Pagani, J. Henriques, A. Garca, E. Jimeno, I. Carrillo, P. Patias, Ch. Georgiadis,
A. Kounoudes, K. Michail. LARA: A location-based and augmented reality assistive system for underground utilities'
networks through GNSS 1-9. [Crossref]
622. Jorge Caldera-Serrano, José-Antonio León-Moreno. 2016. Implications of augmented reality in the management of
television audiovisual information. Journal of Information Science 42:5, 675-680. [Crossref]
623. Kimberly A. Lawless. 2016. Educational Technology. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:2, 169-176.
[Crossref]
624. Tom Baranowski. 2016. Pokémon Go, go, go, gone?. Games for Health Journal 5:5, 293-294. [Crossref]
625. Peter Wozniak, Oliver Vauderwange, Avikarsha Mandal, Nicolas Javahiraly, Dan Curticapean. Possible applications of the
LEAP motion controller for more interactive simulated experiments in augmented or virtual reality 99460P. [Crossref]
626. Marco Mason. 2016. The MIT Museum Glassware Prototype. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 9:3, 1-28.
[Crossref]
627. Maura Mengoni, Margherita Peruzzini, Monica Bordegoni, Massimo Mecella. 2016. Toward an integrated platform to
support contract furniture industry. Computer-Aided Design and Applications 13:5, 662-674. [Crossref]
628. Tiago Dias, Pedro Miraldo, Nuno Gonçalves. 2016. A Framework for Augmented Reality using Non-Central Catadioptric
Cameras. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 83:3-4, 359-373. [Crossref]
629. Susanna Aromaa, Kaisa Väänänen. 2016. Suitability of virtual prototypes to support human factors/ergonomics evaluation
during the design. Applied Ergonomics 56, 11-18. [Crossref]
630. Hejar Gurluk. Concept of an adaptive augmented vision based assistance system for air traffic control towers 1-10. [Crossref]
631. Lukas Baron, Annerose Braune. Case study on applying augmented reality for process supervision in industrial use cases
1-4. [Crossref]
632. Andres Cortes-Davalos, Sonia Mendoza. Layout planning for academic exhibits using Augmented Reality 1-6. [Crossref]
633. Naser F. Mohamed El-firjani, Abdelsalam M. Maatuk. Mobile augmented reality for interactive catalogue 1-4. [Crossref]
634. Jaron Lanier, Victor Mateevitsi, Kishore Rathinavel, Lior Shapira, Joseph Menke, Patrick Therien, Joshua Hudman,
Gheric Speiginer, Andrea Stevenson Won, Andrzej Banburski, Xavier Benavides, Judith Amores, Javier Porras Lurashi,
Wayne Chang. The RealityMashers: Augmented Reality Wide Field-of-View Optical See-Through Head Mounted
Displays 141-146. [Crossref]
635. Kang-Kyu Lee, Jae-Woo Kim, Je-Ho Ryu, Jong-Ok Kim. Chromaticity Based Local Linear Regression for Color
Distortion Estimation of Optical See-Through Displays 151-153. [Crossref]
636. Aguirregoitia Martinez Amaia, Allende Lopez Inigo, R Lopez Benito Jorge, Artetxe Gonzalez Enara. Leihoa: A window
to augmented reality in early childhood education 1-6. [Crossref]
637. Li Li, Wang Xing-zhi, Xu Yao-qiang. Augmented Reality in IT Operation Management of Power System 12-17. [Crossref]
638. Richard A. del Rio, Russell J. Branaghan, Rob Gray. 2016. Design Features of Wearable AR Information Display for
Surgery and Anesthesiology. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 60:1, 571-575.
[Crossref]
639. Prerana Rane, Hyungil Kim, Juan Lopez Marcano, Joseph L. Gabbard. 2016. Virtual Road Signs. Proceedings of the Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 60:1, 1750-1754. [Crossref]
640. David Ackley. 2016. The Carried Network Demarc. Artificial Life Conference Proceedings 56-57. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF
Plus]
641. Tony Liao. 2016. Is it ‘augmented reality’? Contesting boundary work over the definitions and organizing visions for an
emerging technology across field-configuring events. Information and Organization 26:3, 45-62. [Crossref]
642. Jong-Hong Park, Younghwan Shin, Yongkyun Kim, Jong-Moon Chung. 2016. Augmented Reality Technology
Implementation Utilizing Web 3.0 Information Services in Disaster Response Situations. Journal of Internet Computing
and Services 17:4, 61-68. [Crossref]
643. Jungyeon Sung, Jae-wook Jo. 2016. An Exploratory Study on User Experience of Augmented Reality Advertising. Journal
of Digital Convergence 14:8, 177-183. [Crossref]
644. Terri L. Woods, Sarah Reed, Sherry Hsi, John A. Woods, Michael R. Woods. 2016. Pilot Study Using the Augmented
Reality Sandbox to Teach Topographic Maps and Surficial Processes in Introductory Geology Labs. Journal of Geoscience
Education 64:3, 199-214. [Crossref]
645. Breno Carvalho, Marcelo M. Soares, Andre Neves, Gabriel Soares, Anthony Lins. Virtual Reality Devices Applied to
Digital Games 125-141. [Crossref]
646. Rong-Chi Chang, Liang-Yi Chung, Yong-Ming Huang. 2016. Developing an interactive augmented reality system as a
complement to plant education and comparing its effectiveness with video learning. Interactive Learning Environments
24:6, 1245-1264. [Crossref]
647. Shyh-Kuang Ueng, Guan-Zhi Chen. 2016. Vision based multi-user human computer interaction. Multimedia Tools and
Applications 75:16, 10059-10076. [Crossref]
648. E. Gutiérrez de Ravé, F. J. Jiménez-Hornero, A. B. Ariza-Villaverde, J. Taguas-Ruiz. 2016. DiedricAR: a mobile augmented
reality system designed for the ubiquitous descriptive geometry learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications 75:16,
9641-9663. [Crossref]
649. Chien-Hsu Chen, Yin-Yu Chou, Chun-Yen Huang. 2016. An Augmented-Reality-Based Concept Map to Support Mobile
Learning for Science. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 25:4, 567-578. [Crossref]
650. Wei Huang, Min Sun, Songnian Li. 2016. A 3D GIS-based interactive registration mechanism for outdoor augmented
reality system. Expert Systems with Applications 55, 48-58. [Crossref]
651. Shafaq Irshad, Dayang Rohaya Bt Awang. User Perception on Mobile Augmented Reality as a marketing tool 109-113.
[Crossref]
652. Bimo Sunarfri Hantono, Lukito Edi Nugroho, P. Insap Santosa. Review of augmented reality agent in education 150-153.
[Crossref]
653. Fatin Norsyafawati Mohd Sabri, Zulkarnaen Khidzir, Ahmad Rasdan Ismail, Khairul Azhar Mat Daud. Empirical study
on important elements of mobile augmented reality application for heritage content 210-215. [Crossref]
654. Chang-Gyu Lee, Ian Oakley, Eun-Soo Kim, Jeha Ryu. 2016. Impact of Visual-Haptic Spatial Discrepancy on Targeting
Performance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 46:8, 1098-1108. [Crossref]
655. Ingrid Hoelzl, Rémi Marie. 2016. Brave New City: the image in the urban data-space. Visual Communication 15:3, 371-391.
[Crossref]
656. Michel Lemieux, Victor Pilon, Marta Isaacsson. 2016. 4D Art: corps réels et virtuels, une réalité augmentée. Revista
Brasileira de Estudos da Presença 6:2, 352-373. [Crossref]
657. . Bibliography 191-201. [Crossref]
658. Serhat Kut, Semra Aydınlı, Arzu Erdem. 2016. Sibertektonik Mekân. Tasarım + Kuram 9:15, 21-21. [Crossref]
659. Monica Tentori, José Mercado, Franceli L. Cibrian, Lizbeth Escobedo. PERVASIVE COMPUTING TO SUPPORT
INDIVIDUALS WITH COGNITIVE DISABILITIES 137-185. [Crossref]
660. Anasol Pena-Rios, Hani Hagras, Michael Gardner, Gilbert Owusu. A Fuzzy Logic based system for Mixed Reality assistance
of remote workforce 408-415. [Crossref]
661. Hui-Chun Chu, Yu-Hsuan Sung. A Context-Aware Progressive Inquiry-Based Augmented Reality System to Improving
Students' Investigation Learning Abilities for High School Geography Courses 353-356. [Crossref]
662. Min-Chai Hsieh. Teachers' and Students' Perceptions toward Augmented Reality Materials 1180-1181. [Crossref]
663. Greyce Schroeder, Charles Steinmetz, Carlos Eduardo Pereira, Ivan Muller, Natanael Garcia, Danubia Espindola, Ricardo
Rodrigues. Visualising the digital twin using web services and augmented reality 522-527. [Crossref]
664. Maria Beatriz Carmo, Ana Paula Afonso, Antonio Ferreira, Ana Paula Claudio, Goncalo Silva. PoI Awareness, Relevance
and Aggregation for Augmented Reality 300-305. [Crossref]
665. Gregory Kramida. 2016. Resolving the Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in Head-Mounted Displays. IEEE Transactions
on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22:7, 1912-1931. [Crossref]
666. Roopesh Kevin Sungkur, Akshay Panchoo, Nitisha Kirtee Bhoyroo. 2016. Augmented reality, the future of contextual
mobile learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 13:2, 123-146. [Crossref]
667. Yujia Huang, Hui Li, Ricci Fong. 2016. Using Augmented Reality in early art education: a case study in Hong Kong
kindergarten. Early Child Development and Care 186:6, 879-894. [Crossref]
668. Victoria Rautenbach, Serena Coetzee, Danie Jooste. 2016. Results of an evaluation of augmented reality mobile
development frameworks for addresses in augmented reality. Spatial Information Research 24:3, 211-223. [Crossref]
669. Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Martin Yongho Hyun. 2016. Predicting the use of smartphone-based Augmented Reality (AR): Does
telepresence really help?. Computers in Human Behavior 59, 28-38. [Crossref]
670. Alaaeddine Yousfi, Christine Bauer, Rajaa Saidi, Anind K. Dey. 2016. uBPMN: A BPMN extension for modeling
ubiquitous business processes. Information and Software Technology 74, 55-68. [Crossref]
671. Filippo D'Ippolito, Marco Massaro. A multi-sensor multi-rate algorithm for motor rehabilitation with Augmented Reality
devices 759-765. [Crossref]
672. Liang-Chieh Chen, Yi Yang, Jiang Wang, Wei Xu, Alan L. Yuille. Attention to Scale: Scale-Aware Semantic Image
Segmentation 3640-3649. [Crossref]
673. F. D'Ippolito, M. Massaro, A. Sferlazza. An adaptive multi-rate system for visual tracking in augmented reality applications
355-361. [Crossref]
674. Alexandre Pereira, Gun A. Lee, Edson Almeida, Mark Billinghurst. A Study in Virtual Navigation Cues for Forklift
Operators 95-99. [Crossref]
675. Ying-Chieh Liu, Chin-Yu Kao, Amaresh Chakrabarti, Chien-Hung Chen. 2016. Innovation-supporting tools for
novice designers: Converting existing artifacts and transforming new concepts. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 8:6,
168781401665137. [Crossref]
676. Xin Shen, Hong Hua, Bahram Javidi. 3D augmented reality with integral imaging display 98670Y. [Crossref]
677. Kevin Harding. Use of display technologies for augmented reality enhancement 986704. [Crossref]
678. Katie Seaborn, Jamal Edey, Gregory Dolinar, Margot Whitfield, Paula Gardner, Carmen Branje, Deborah I. Fels. 2016.
Accessible Play in Everyday Spaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 23:2, 1-28. [Crossref]
679. Ren-Jung Chang, Jia-Cheng Jau. 2016. Augmented Reality in Peg-in-Hole Microassembly Operations. International
Journal of Automation Technology 10:3, 438-446. [Crossref]
680. Guido Maria Re, James Oliver, Monica Bordegoni. 2016. Impact of monitor-based augmented reality for on-site industrial
manual operations. Cognition, Technology & Work 18:2, 379-392. [Crossref]
681. Yi-Chen Chen, Hung-Lin Chi, Shih-Chung Kang, Shang-Hsien Hsieh. 2016. Attention-Based User Interface Design for
a Tele-Operated Crane. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 30:3, 04015030. [Crossref]
682. Soh Nishimoto, Maki Tonooka, Kazutoshi Fujita, Yohei Sotsuka, Toshihiro Fujiwara, Kenichiro Kawai, Masao Kakibuchi.
2016. An augmented reality system in lymphatico-venous anastomosis surgery. Journal of Surgical Case Reports 2016:5,
rjw047. [Crossref]
683. Min-Chai Hsieh. Teachers' and students' perceptions toward augmented reality materials 1-2. [Crossref]
684. Hong-yi Pai. An imitation of 3D projection mapping using augmented reality and shader effects 1-4. [Crossref]
685. Sangyoon Lee, Xinda Hu, Hong Hua. 2016. Effects of Optical Combiner and IPD Change for Convergence on Near-
Field Depth Perception in an Optical See-Through HMD. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
22:5, 1540-1554. [Crossref]
686. Peter Lincoln, Alex Blate, Montek Singh, Turner Whitted, Andrei State, Anselmo Lastra, Henry Fuchs. 2016. From
Motion to Photons in 80 Microseconds: Towards Minimal Latency for Virtual and Augmented Reality. IEEE Transactions
on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22:4, 1367-1376. [Crossref]
687. Sangyoon Lee, Hong Hua. 2016. Effects of Configuration of Optical Combiner on Near-Field Depth Perception in Optical
See-Through Head-Mounted Displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22:4, 1432-1441.
[Crossref]
688. Shuxin Liu, Yan Li, Pengcheng Zhou, Xiao Li, Na Rong, Shuaijia Huang, Wenqing Lu, Yikai Su. 2016. A multi-plane
optical see-through head mounted display design for augmented reality applications. Journal of the Society for Information
Display 24:4, 246-251. [Crossref]
689. Cristiano Ceglie, Giuseppe Piro, Domenico Striccoli, Pietro Camarda. 2016. 3DStreaming: an open-source flexible
framework for real-time 3D streaming services. Multimedia Tools and Applications 75:8, 4411-4440. [Crossref]
690. Mhd Wael Bazzaza, Mona Alzubaidi, M. Jamal Zemerly, Luis Weruga, Jason Ng. Impact of smart immersive mobile
learning in language literacy education 443-447. [Crossref]
691. Xiaochun Cao, Liang Yang, Xiaojie Guo. 2016. Total Variation Regularized RPCA for Irregularly Moving Object Detection
Under Dynamic Background. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 46:4, 1014-1027. [Crossref]
692. Srinivasa K. G., Satvik Jagannath, Aakash Nidhi. 2016. Know Your World Better. International Journal of Handheld
Computing Research 7:2, 1-15. [Crossref]
693. Jinwook Shim, Yoonsik Yang, Nahyung Kang, Jonghoon Seo, Tack-Don Han. 2016. Gesture-based interactive augmented
reality content authoring system using HMD. Virtual Reality 20:1, 57-69. [Crossref]
694. S. Garrido-Jurado, R. Muñoz-Salinas, F.J. Madrid-Cuevas, R. Medina-Carnicer. 2016. Generation of fiducial marker
dictionaries using Mixed Integer Linear Programming. Pattern Recognition 51, 481-491. [Crossref]
695. Steven K. Ayer, John I. Messner, Chimay J. Anumba. 2016. Augmented Reality Gaming in Sustainable Design Education.
Journal of Architectural Engineering 22:1, 04015012. [Crossref]
696. Manoela M. O. da Silva, Rafael A. Roberto, Veronica Teichrieb, Patricia S. Cavalcante. Towards the development of
guidelines for educational evaluation of augmented reality tools 17-21. [Crossref]
697. Valerie Kane, Missie Smith, Gary Burnett, Joseph L. Gabbard, David Large. Depth perception in mirrors: The effects of
video-based augmented reality in driver's side view mirrors 195-196. [Crossref]
698. Rui Guo, Liu Liu, Wei Wang, Ali Taalimi, Chi Zhang, Hairong Qi. Deep tree-structured face: A unified representation
for multi-task facial biometrics 1-8. [Crossref]
699. Keesung Kim, Jiyeon Hwang, Hangjung Zo, Hwansoo Lee. 2016. Understanding users’ continuance intention toward
smartphone augmented reality applications. Information Development 32:2, 161-174. [Crossref]
700. Anton Savov, Oliver Tessmann, Stig Anton Nielsen. 2016. Sensitive Assembly: Gamifying the design and assembly of
façade wall prototypes. International Journal of Architectural Computing 14:1, 30-48. [Crossref]
701. Rafael Radkowski. 2016. Object Tracking With a Range Camera for Augmented Reality Assembly Assistance. Journal of
Computing and Information Science in Engineering 16:1, 011004. [Crossref]
702. Michael Madary, Thomas K. Metzinger. 2016. Recommendations for Good Scientific Practice and the Consumers of VR-
Technology. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3. . [Crossref]
703. Cristina Botella, M. Ángeles Pérez-Ara, Juana Bretón-López, Soledad Quero, Azucena García-Palacios, Rosa María Baños.
2016. In Vivo versus Augmented Reality Exposure in the Treatment of Small Animal Phobia: A Randomized Controlled
Trial. PLOS ONE 11:2, e0148237. [Crossref]
704. Ralf Dörner, Wolfgang Broll, Paul Grimm, Bernhard Jung. 2016. Virtual Reality und Augmented Reality (VR/AR).
Informatik-Spektrum 39:1, 30-37. [Crossref]
705. Torgeir K. Haavik. 2016. Keep your coats on: augmented reality and sensework in surgery and surgical telemedicine.
Cognition, Technology & Work 18:1, 175-191. [Crossref]
706. Chien-Hsu Chen, I-Jui Lee, Ling-Yi Lin. 2016. Augmented reality-based video-modeling storybook of nonverbal facial
cues for children with autism spectrum disorder to improve their perceptions and judgments of facial expressions and
emotions. Computers in Human Behavior 55, 477-485. [Crossref]
707. Dong Woo Seo, Hyun Kim, Jae Sung Kim, Jae Yeol Lee. 2016. Hybrid reality-based user experience and evaluation of a
context-aware smart home. Computers in Industry 76, 11-23. [Crossref]
708. Masoud Gheisari, Javier Irizarry. 2016. Investigating human and technological requirements for successful implementation
of a BIM-based mobile augmented reality environment in facility management practices. Facilities 34:1/2, 69-84. [Crossref]
709. Yoonsik Yang, Jiwook Shim, Seungho Chae, Tack-Don Han. Mobile Augmented Reality Authoring Tool 358-361.
[Crossref]
710. Pedro Cunha, Jorge Brandao, Jose Vasconcelos, Filomena Soares, Vitor Carvalho. Augmented reality for cognitive and
social skills improvement in children with ASD 334-335. [Crossref]
711. Jorge Joo Nagata, Jose Rafael Garcia-Bermejo Giner, Fernando Martinez Abad. 2016. Virtual Heritage of the Territory:
Design and Implementation of Educational Resources in Augmented Reality and Mobile Pedestrian Navigation. IEEE
Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje 11:1, 41-46. [Crossref]
712. Federica Pallavicini, Silvia Serino, Pietro Cipresso, Elisa Pedroli, Irene Alice Chicchi Giglioli, Alice Chirico, Gian Mauro
Manzoni, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Enrico Molinari, Giuseppe Riva. 2016. Testing Augmented Reality for Cue Exposure in
Obese Patients: An Exploratory Study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 19:2, 107-114. [Crossref]
713. Mauricio Hincapie, Christian Diaz, Maria Zapata, Camilo Mesias. 2016. Methodological Framework for the Design and
Development of Applications for Reactivation of Cultural Heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 9:2, 1-24.
[Crossref]
714. Yuta Yamaguchi, Yasuhiro Takaki. 2016. See-through integral imaging display with background occlusion capability.
Applied Optics 55:3, A144. [Crossref]
715. Hsien-Sheng Hsiao, Cheng-Sian Chang, Chien-Yu Lin, Yau-Zng Wang. 2016. Weather observers: a manipulative
augmented reality system for weather simulations at home, in the classroom, and at a museum. Interactive Learning
Environments 24:1, 205-223. [Crossref]
716. Gallayanee Yaoyuneyong, Jamye Foster, Erik Johnson, David Johnson. 2016. Augmented Reality Marketing: Consumer
Preferences and Attitudes Toward Hypermedia Print Ads. Journal of Interactive Advertising 16:1, 16-30. [Crossref]
717. Camillia Matuk. 2016. The Learning Affordances of Augmented Reality for Museum Exhibits on Human Health.
Museums & Social Issues 11:1, 73-87. [Crossref]
718. Ting-Chia Hsu. The Application and Evaluation of Augmented Reality-Integrated e-Books in Living Technology
Education 1-22. [Crossref]
719. Ting-Chia Hsu, Gwo-Jen Hwang. The Application of Augmented Reality in English Vocabulary Learning for Elementary
School Students 1-19. [Crossref]
720. Hui-Chun Chu. Applying a Repertory Grid-Oriented Mindtool to Developing a Knowledge Construction Augmented
Reality Mobile Learning System 1-21. [Crossref]
721. Xiaoling Wang, Corné P.J.M. van Elzakker, Menno Jan Kraak. User Requirements Analysis for a Mobile Augmented
Reality Tool Supporting Geography Fieldwork 433-450. [Crossref]
722. Daniela Markov-Vetter, Vanja Zander, Joachim Latsch, Oliver Staadt. Enhancement of Direct Augmented Reality Object
Selection by Gravity-Adapted Target Resizing 75-96. [Crossref]
723. Dezhen Song, Ken Goldberg, Nak-Young Chong. Networked Robots 1109-1134. [Crossref]
724. Jeongmin Yu, Jin-u Jeon, Gabyong Park, Hyung-il Kim, Woontack Woo. A Unified Framework for Remote Collaboration
Using Interactive AR Authoring and Hands Tracking 132-141. [Crossref]
725. Tamás Matuszka, Attila Kiss, Woontack Woo. A Formal Model for Context-Aware Semantic Augmented Reality Systems
91-102. [Crossref]
726. Valéria Farinazzo Martins, Paulo N. M. Sampaio, Fernanda da S. Mendes, André Santos Lima, Marcelo de Paiva Guimarães.
Usability and Functionality Assessment of an Oculus Rift in Immersive and Interactive Systems Using Voice Commands
222-232. [Crossref]
727. Fumiko Ishizawa, Tatsuo Nakajima. An Enhanced Real Space Through Temporally Connecting Real and Virtual Scenes
11-19. [Crossref]
728. Mauro Figueiredo, Maria-Ángeles Cifredo-Chacón, Vítor Gonçalves. Learning Programming and Electronics with
Augmented Reality 57-64. [Crossref]
729. Carolina Cani D.L., Felipe B. Breyer, Judith Kelner. Remote HRI and Mixed Reality, an Ontology 249-257. [Crossref]
730. Vincent Havard, David Baudry, Xavier Savatier, Benoit Jeanne, Anne Louis, Bélahcène Mazari. Augmented Industrial
Maintenance (AIM): A Case Study for Evaluating and Comparing with Paper and Video Media Supports 302-320.
[Crossref]
731. Nicola Masotti, Francesca De Crescenzio, Sara Bagassi. Augmented Reality in the Control Tower: A Rendering Pipeline
for Multiple Head-Tracked Head-up Displays 321-338. [Crossref]
732. Nicola Masotti, Sara Bagassi, Francesca De Crescenzio. Augmented Reality for the Control Tower: The RETINA Concept
444-452. [Crossref]
733. Luca Greci. An Augmented Reality Guide for Religious Museum 280-289. [Crossref]
734. Kaapo Seppälä, Olli I. Heimo, Timo Korkalainen, Juho Pääkylä, Jussi Latvala, Seppo Helle, Lauri Härkänen, Sami Jokela,
Lauri Järvenpää, Frans Saukko, Lauri Viinikkala, Tuomas Mäkilä, Teijo Lehtonen. Examining User Experience in an
Augmented Reality Adventure Game: Case Luostarinmäki Handicrafts Museum 257-276. [Crossref]
735. Leman Figen Gül, Müge Halıcı, Can Uzun, Mustafa Esengün. Understanding the Impact of Mobile Augmented Reality
on Co-design Cognition and Co-modelling 362-370. [Crossref]
736. Kadar Manuella, Domsa Ovidiu. ArchaeoInside: Multimodal Visualization of Augmented Reality and Interaction with
Archaeological Artifacts 749-757. [Crossref]
737. Fumiko Ishizawa, Tatsuo Nakajima. Alternative Reality: An Augmented Daily Urban World Inserting Virtual Scenes
Temporally 353-364. [Crossref]
738. Thummarat Boonrod, Phatthanaphong Chomphuwiset, Chatklaw Jareanpon. The Marker Detection from Product Logo
for Augmented Reality Technology 421-432. [Crossref]
739. Charles Z. Liu, Manolya Kavakli. Mixed Reality with a Collaborative Information System 205-219. [Crossref]
740. Sebastian Robert, Sebastian Büttner, Carsten Röcker, Andreas Holzinger. Reasoning Under Uncertainty: Towards
Collaborative Interactive Machine Learning 357-376. [Crossref]
741. Sameer Mittal, Muztoba Ahmad Khan, Thorsten Wuest. Smart Manufacturing: Characteristics and Technologies
539-548. [Crossref]
742. Tong-Ann Sytwu, Chien-Hwa Wang. An Investigation of the Effects of Individual Differences on Mobile-Based
Augmented Reality English Vocabulary Learning 387-410. [Crossref]
743. David D. Luxton, Jennifer D. June, Akane Sano, Timothy Bickmore. Intelligent Mobile, Wearable, and Ambient
Technologies for Behavioral Health Care 137-162. [Crossref]
744. Kuang Yu Huang, I-Hui Li. 2016. A multi-attribute decision-making model for the robust classification of multiple inputs
and outputs datasets with uncertainty. Applied Soft Computing 38, 176-189. [Crossref]
745. Rabia M. Yilmaz. 2016. Educational magic toys developed with augmented reality technology for early childhood education.
Computers in Human Behavior 54, 240-248. [Crossref]
746. Mario Lušić, Christian Fischer, Jochen Bönig, Rüdiger Hornfeck, Jörg Franke. 2016. Worker Information Systems: State
of the Art and Guideline for Selection under Consideration of Company Specific Boundary Conditions. Procedia CIRP
41, 1113-1118. [Crossref]
747. Isabel Lopes, Patrícia Senra, Sandrina Vilarinho, Vera Sá, Catarina Teixeira, João Lopes, Anabela Alves, José A. Oliveira,
Manuel Figueiredo. 2016. Requirements Specification of a Computerized Maintenance Management System – A Case
Study. Procedia CIRP 52, 268-273. [Crossref]
748. Sachin Kansal, Sudipto Mukherjee. 2016. Vision Based Manipulation of a Regular Shaped Object. Procedia Computer
Science 84, 142-146. [Crossref]
749. Daniel Sampaio, Pedro Almeida. 2016. Pedagogical Strategies for the Integration of Augmented Reality in ICT Teaching
and Learning Processes. Procedia Computer Science 100, 894-899. [Crossref]
750. Liliya Demidova. 2016. Augmented Reality and ARToolkit for Android: the First Steps. SHS Web of Conferences 29,
02010. [Crossref]
751. Valarmathie Gopalan, Abdul Nasir Zulkifli, Juliana Aida Abu Bakar. A learning performance study between the
conventional approach and augmented reality textbook among secondary school students 020039. [Crossref]
752. Valarmathie Gopalan, Abdul Nasir Zulkifli, Juliana Aida Abu Bakar. A study of students’ motivation using the augmented
reality science textbook 020040. [Crossref]
753. Ulka Chandini Pendit, Syamsul Bahrin Zaibon, Juliana Aida Abu Bakar. Measuring enjoyable informal learning using
augmented reality at cultural heritage site 020087. [Crossref]
754. Shivnarayan Rajappa, Gaurav Raj. Application and scope analysis of Augmented Reality in marketing using image
processing technique 435-440. [Crossref]
755. Andreas Baechler, Liane Baechler, Sven Autenrieth, Peter Kurtz, Thomas Hoerz, Thomas Heidenreich, Georg Kruell. A
Comparative Study of an Assistance System for Manual Order Picking -- Called Pick-by-Projection -- with the Guiding
Systems Pick-by-Paper, Pick-by-Light and Pick-by-Display 523-531. [Crossref]
756. Prakash P., Kannammal K.E.. Dynamic hand interaction in handheld AR 1-6. [Crossref]
757. Fiandra Fatharany, Ridho Rahman Hariadi, Darlis Herumurti, Anny Yuniarti. Augmented reality application for cockroach
phobia therapy using everyday objects as marker substitute 49-52. [Crossref]
758. Jared A. Frank, Vikram Kapila. Towards teleoperation-based interactive learning of robot kinematics using a mobile
augmented reality interface on a tablet 385-392. [Crossref]
759. Omer Akgul, H. Ibrahim Penekli, Yakup Genc. Applying Deep Learning in Augmented Reality Tracking 47-54. [Crossref]
760. Maria-Blanca Ibanez, Angela Di-Serio, Diego Villaran-Molina, Carlos Delgado-Kloos. 2016. Support for Augmented
Reality Simulation Systems: The Effects of Scaffolding on Learning Outcomes and Behavior Patterns. IEEE Transactions
on Learning Technologies 9:1, 46-56. [Crossref]
761. Sidhant Goyal, Rohan S. Vijay, Charu Monga, Pratul Kalita. Code Bits 441-447. [Crossref]
762. Ivan Poupyrev, Nan-Wei Gong, Shiho Fukuhara, Mustafa Emre Karagozler, Carsten Schwesig, Karen E. Robinson. Project
Jacquard 4216-4227. [Crossref]
763. Kiron Lebeck, Tadayoshi Kohno, Franziska Roesner. How to Safely Augment Reality 45-50. [Crossref]
764. Isabel Pedersen, Nathan Gale, Pejman Mirza-Babaei. TombSeer 1-4. [Crossref]
765. Marina Cidota, Stephan Lukosch, Dragos Datcu, Heide Lukosch. Workspace Awareness in Collaborative AR using HMDs
1-8. [Crossref]
766. Spencer Russell, Gershon Dublon, Joseph A. Paradiso. HearThere 1-8. [Crossref]
767. Shafaq Irshad, Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli. Multi-layered Mobile Augmented Reality Framework for Positive User
Experience 21-26. [Crossref]
768. Markus Santoso, Christian Jacob. Holobody galleries 1-4. [Crossref]
769. Ashley Colley, Wouter Van Vlaenderen, Johannes Schöning, Jonna Häkkilä. Changing the camera-to-screen angle to
improve AR browser usage 442-452. [Crossref]
770. Dragoş Datcu, Stephan G. Lukosch, Heide K. Lukosch. Handheld Augmented Reality for Distributed Collaborative Crime
Scene Investigation 267-276. [Crossref]
771. Thomas Mühlematter, Flavia Donno. Why smart bankers wear glasses 16-23. [Crossref]
772. Sabine Langlois, Thomas NGuyen That, Pierre Mermillod. Virtual Head-up Displays for Augmented Reality in Cars
1-8. [Crossref]
773. Ashley Colley, Tuomas Lappalainen, Elisa Määttänen, Johannes Schöning, Jonna Häkkilä. Crouch, Hold and Engage
1-8. [Crossref]
774. Wolfgang Hürst, Daisuke Iwai, Prabhakaran Balakrishnan. International workshop on multimodal virtual and augmented
reality (workshop summary) 596-597. [Crossref]
775. Luís Fernando Maia, Windson Viana, Fernando Trinta. A real-time x-ray mobile application using augmented reality and
google street view 111-119. [Crossref]
776. Álvaro Montero, Telmo Zarraonandia, Paloma Díaz, Ignacio Aedo. Creating Interactive and Realistic Augmented Reality
Experiences 1-4. [Crossref]
777. Hanna Schraffenberger, Edwin van der Heide. Multimodal augmented reality 1-6. [Crossref]
778. Xiangwen Xiong, Wei Li. Antigravity and following VR, AR & MR system for spatial interaction 1-2. [Crossref]
779. Bhuvaneswari Sarupuri, Gun A. Lee, Mark Billinghurst. Using augmented reality to assist forklift operation 16-24.
[Crossref]
780. Hang Dong, Fei Wang, Peilin Jiang. An accurate multi-sensor fusion measurement method for marker-free augmented
reality system 447-450. [Crossref]
781. Erasmo Miranda Bojórquez, Osslan Osiris Vergara Villegas, Vianey Guadalupe Cruz Sánchez, Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz,
Jesús Favela Vara. 2016. Study on Mobile Augmented Reality Adoption for Mayo Language Learning. Mobile Information
Systems 2016, 1-15. [Crossref]
782. Wernhuar Tarng, Yu-Sheng Lin, Chiu-Pin Lin, Kuo-Liang Ou. 2016. Development of a Lunar-Phase Observation System
Based on Augmented Reality and Mobile Learning Technologies. Mobile Information Systems 2016, 1-12. [Crossref]
783. Ina Primiana, Yudi Azis, Juanim, Akhmad Yunani, Aldrin Herwany. 2016. Improvement Strategy for Supply Chain
Performance of the Garment Industry to Decrease Logistics Costs and Enhance Competitiveness. Journal of Industrial and
Intelligent Information . [Crossref]
784. Takeshi UNO, Kazuhiro SASA, Haruhisa HAYASHI, Hidehiko NAKANO. 2016. Development of AR Molecular
Graphics Display Application for Smartphone. Journal of Computer Chemistry, Japan 14:6, 196-198. [Crossref]
785. Stefanos Giasiranis, Loizos Sofos. 2016. Production and Evaluation of Educational Material Using Augmented Reality for
Teaching the Module of “Representation of the Information on Computers” in Junior High School. Creative Education
07:09, 1270-1291. [Crossref]
786. W. Kim, N. Kerle, M. Gerke. 2016. Mobile augmented reality in support of building damage and safety assessment. Natural
Hazards and Earth System Sciences 16:1, 287-298. [Crossref]
787. D. Gavrili-Alexandris, Ph. Vakalakis. Running on Heritage, a Conceptual Discussion on the Roles of Heritage Trails and
of Augmented Reality on Amateur Runner Athletes 589-602. [Crossref]
788. Irene Alice Chicchi Giglioli, Alice Chirico, Pietro Cipresso, Silvia Serino, Elisa Pedroli, Federica Pallavicini, Giuseppe Riva.
Feeling Ghost Food as Real One: Psychometric Assessment of Presence Engagement Exposing to Food in Augmented
Reality 99-109. [Crossref]
789. Saša Ćuković, Goran Devedžić, Frieder Pankratz, Khalifa Baizid, Ionut Ghionea, Andreja Kostić. Augmented Reality
Simulation of CAM Spatial Tool Paths in Prismatic Milling Sequences 516-525. [Crossref]
790. Mauricio A. Frigo, Ethel C. C. da Silva, Gustavo F. Barbosa. 2016. Augmented Reality in Aerospace Manufacturing: A
Review. Journal of Industrial and Intelligent Information . [Crossref]
791. Vladimír Hain, Robert Löffler, Viliam Zajíček. 2016. Interdisciplinary Cooperation in the Virtual Presentation of Industrial
Heritage Development. Procedia Engineering 161, 2030-2035. [Crossref]
792. Azizul Hassan, Roya Rahimi. Consuming “Innovation” in Tourism 130-147. [Crossref]
793. Pavel Gurevich, Joel Lanir, Benjamin Cohen. 2015. Design and Implementation of TeleAdvisor: a Projection-Based
Augmented Reality System for Remote Collaboration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 24:6, 527-562.
[Crossref]
794. Stephan Lukosch, Heide Lukosch, Dragoş Datcu, Marina Cidota. 2015. Providing Information on the Spot: Using
Augmented Reality for Situational Awareness in the Security Domain. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
24:6, 613-664. [Crossref]
795. Stephan Lukosch, Mark Billinghurst, Leila Alem, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa. 2015. Collaboration in Augmented Reality. Computer
Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 24:6, 515-525. [Crossref]
796. Cheng-ping Chen, Chang-Hwa Wang. 2015. Employing Augmented-Reality-Embedded Instruction to Disperse the
Imparities of Individual Differences in Earth Science Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology 24:6, 835-847.
[Crossref]
797. Pei-Yu Lin, Chin-Hung Teng, Yi-Hui Chen. Diverse augmented reality exhibitions for differential users based upon
private quick response code 1121-1125. [Crossref]
798. Farhan Mohamed, Som Chai Chai Tong, Bazli Tomi, Mohd Khalid Mokhtar, Yusman Azimi Yusoff. Heart Care
Augmented Reality Mobile Simulation (heARt) 1-6. [Crossref]
799. Mahfoud Hamidia, Nadia Zenati, Hayet Belghit, Kamila Guetiteni, Nouara Achour. Voice interaction using Gaussian
Mixture Models for Augmented Reality applications 1-4. [Crossref]
800. Loubna Ahmed, Salma Hamdy, Doaa Hegazy, Taha El-Arif. Interaction techniques in mobile Augmented Reality: State-
of-the-art 424-433. [Crossref]
801. Lim Kok Cheng, Fatimah Puteh, Ali Selamat, Farhan Bin Mohamed. A review of recent usability measures in English
Language Teaching (ELT) technologies 278-283. [Crossref]
802. Jeff K. T. Tang, Tin-Yung Au Duong, Yui-Wang Ng, Hoi-Kit Luk. Learning to create 3D models via an augmented
reality smartphone interface 236-241. [Crossref]
803. Dragos Datcu, Stephan Lukosch, Heide Lukosch, Marina Cidota. 2015. Using augmented reality for supporting
information exchange in teams from the security domain. Security Informatics 4:1. . [Crossref]
804. Erkan Bostanci, Nadia Kanwal, Adrian F Clark. 2015. Augmented reality applications for cultural heritage using Kinect.
Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences 5:1. . [Crossref]
805. Sebastjan Meža, Žiga Turk, Matevž Dolenc. 2015. Measuring the potential of augmented reality in civil engineering.
Advances in Engineering Software 90, 1-10. [Crossref]
806. Mi Jeong Kim, Xiangyu Wang, Sooyeon Han, Ying Wang. 2015. Implementing an augmented reality-enabled wayfinding
system through studying user experience and requirements in complex environments. Visualization in Engineering 3:1. .
[Crossref]
807. Helen C. Miles, Raimund Karl, Jonathan C. Roberts, Andrew T. Wilson, Frédéric Labrosse, Bernard Tiddeman, Seren
Griffiths, Ben Edwards, Panagiotis D. Ritsos, Joseph W. Mearman, Katharina Möller. 2015. Alternative Representations
of 3D-Reconstructed Heritage Data. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 9:1, 1-18. [Crossref]
808. Viviane Kostrubiec, Guillaume Dumas, Pier-Giorgio Zanone, J. A. Scott Kelso. 2015. The Virtual Teacher (VT) Paradigm:
Learning New Patterns of Interpersonal Coordination Using the Human Dynamic Clamp. PLOS ONE 10:11, e0142029.
[Crossref]
809. Wernhuar Tarng, Kuo-Liang Ou, Chuan-Sheng Yu, Fong-Lu Liou, Hsin-Hun Liou. 2015. Development of a virtual
butterfly ecological system based on augmented reality and mobile learning technologies. Virtual Reality 19:3-4, 253-266.
[Crossref]
810. Hanna Stockinger. 2015. Consumers’ Perception of Augmented Reality as an Emerging end User Technology: Social
Media Monitoring Applied. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 29:4, 419-439. [Crossref]
811. Tin-Hui Lin, Chao-Hsiang Liu, Meng-Han Tsai, Shih-Chung Kang. 2015. Using Augmented Reality in a Multiscreen
Environment for Construction Discussion. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 29:6, 04014088. [Crossref]
812. Metehan Guzel, Muhammet Unal. A survey of insect eye inspired visual sensors 139-142. [Crossref]
813. S. R. Kamel Tabbakh, R. Habibi, S. Vafadar. Design and implementation of a framework based on augmented reality for
phobia treatment applications 366-370. [Crossref]
814. Jingang Wang, Xiao Xiao, Hong Hua, Bahram Javidi. 2015. Augmented Reality 3D Displays With Micro Integral Imaging.
Journal of Display Technology 11:11, 889-893. [Crossref]
815. Choi, Su Min, Jung Min Pyun. 2015. A Study on the Augmented Reality-based Experience Exhibition Immersion. Journal
of Korea Design Forum null:49, 167-178. [Crossref]
816. M.E. Portman, A. Natapov, D. Fisher-Gewirtzman. 2015. To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in
architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 54, 376-384.
[Crossref]
817. Jeong Hwan Lee, Jun Lee, Yong Jin Kwon. 2015. A Proposal of a Mobile Augmented Reality Service Model based on
Street Data, and its Implementation. Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society 23:5, 9-19. [Crossref]
818. Peter Wozniak, Oliver Vauderwange, Dan Curticapean, Nicolas Javahiraly, Kai Israel. Perform light and optic experiments
in Augmented Reality 97930H. [Crossref]
819. David Furió, Martin Hachet, Jean-Paul Guillet, Bruno Bousquet, Stéphanie Fleck, Patrick Reuter, Lionel Canioni. AMI:
Augmented Michelson Interferometer 97930M. [Crossref]
820. George Koutromanos, Alivisos Sofos, Lucy Avraamidou. 2015. The use of augmented reality games in education: a review
of the literature. Educational Media International 52:4, 253-271. [Crossref]
821. Rebecca Rouse, Maria Engberg, Nassim JafariNaimi, Jay David Bolter. 2015. MR X : an interdisciplinary framework for
mixed reality experience design and criticism. Digital Creativity 26:3-4, 175-181. [Crossref]
822. Jorge Martín-Gutiérrez, Peña Fabiani, Wanda Benesova, María Dolores Meneses, Carlos E. Mora. 2015. Augmented
reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior 51, 752-761.
[Crossref]
823. Mehrdad Heydarzadeh, Mehrdad Nourani, James Park. An augmented reality platform for CABG surgery 1-4. [Crossref]
824. Huibai Wang, Junli Qin, Fengquan Zhang. A new interaction method for augmented reality based on ARToolKit 578-583.
[Crossref]
825. Alena Mesarosova, Manuel Ferrer Hernandez. Art Behind the Mind: Exploring New Art Forms by Implementation of
the Electroencephalography 259-266. [Crossref]
826. Jorge D. Camba, Manuel Contero. From reality to augmented reality: Rapid strategies for developing marker-based AR
content using image capturing and authoring tools 1-6. [Crossref]
827. Ibrahim Arda Cankaya, Arif Koyun, Tuncay Yigit, Asim Sinan Yuksel. Mobile indoor navigation system in iOS platform
using augmented reality 281-284. [Crossref]
828. Akilan Thangarajah, Jonathan Wu, Bakri Madon, Adib Kabir Chowdhury. Vision-based registration for augmented reality-
a short survey 463-468. [Crossref]
829. Deepti Prit Kaur, Archana Mantri. Computer vision and sensor fusion for efficient hybrid tracking in augmented reality
systems 176-181. [Crossref]
830. Tony Liao, Lee Humphreys. 2015. Layar-ed places: Using mobile augmented reality to tactically reengage, reproduce,
and reappropriate public space. New Media & Society 17:9, 1418-1435. [Crossref]
831. Qiwei Wang, Dewen Cheng, Qichao Hou, Yuan Hu, Yongtian Wang. 2015. Stray light and tolerance analysis of an ultrathin
waveguide display. Applied Optics 54:28, 8354. [Crossref]
832. Cheng-Hung Huang, Chun-Wen Chao. 2015. The Effects on Driving Speed of a Head-Up Display of Road Warnings.
Perceptual and Motor Skills 121:2, 494-508. [Crossref]
833. Cathy H. C. Hsu. Tourism Education Scholarship 1-11. [Crossref]
834. Kellee Caton. Studying Tourism: Where’s the Humanity in It? 15-39. [Crossref]
835. Matthias Fuchs, Peter Fredman, Dimitri Ioannides. Tourism PhD Studies: A Swedish Experience-Based Perspective 61-79.
[Crossref]
836. Acolla Lewis-Cameron. Rethinking Caribbean Tourism Education 81-97. [Crossref]
837. Nevenka Čavlek. Experiential Learning in Tourism Education: The Case of ITHAS 101-113. [Crossref]
838. Elena Marchiori, Lorenzo Cantoni. Including Augmented Reality in Tourism Education Programs 115-134. [Crossref]
839. Jarmo Ritalahti. Inquiry Learning in Tourism: Haaga-Helia Porvoo Campus 135-151. [Crossref]
840. Michael O’Regan, Jaeyeon Choe. Developing Student Engagement in China Through Collaborative Action Research
153-167. [Crossref]
841. Pauline J. Sheldon. Conclusion and the Way Forward 169-177. [Crossref]
842. Tanja Mihalič, Janne J. Liburd, Jaume Guia. Values in Tourism: The Case of EMTM 41-59. [Crossref]
843. . References 179-210. [Crossref]
844. Joaquín Cubillo, Sergio Martin, Manuel Castro, Ivica Boticki. 2015. Preparing augmented reality learning content should be
easy: UNED ARLE-an authoring tool for augmented reality learning environments. Computer Applications in Engineering
Education 23:5, 778-789. [Crossref]
845. Namho Chung, Heejeong Han, Youhee Joun. 2015. Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality
(AR) application for a heritage site. Computers in Human Behavior 50, 588-599. [Crossref]
846. Maritzol Tenemaza, Angelica de Antonio, Jaime Ramirez. The models and their vocabulary for the Adaptive Augmented
Reality A²R 180-188. [Crossref]
847. Daniel Mauricio Salamanca Diaz. Creating educational content with Augmented Reality applying principles of the cognitive
theory of multimedia learning: Comparative study to teach how to fly a drone (quadcopter) 456-462. [Crossref]
848. CJ Davies, Alan Miller, Richard Fawcett. Mobile onsite exploration of parallel realities with Oculus Rift 301-304. [Crossref]
849. Francisco Guimaraes, Mauro Figueiredo, Jose Rodrigues. Augmented Reality and Storytelling in heritage application in
public gardens: Caloust Gulbenkian Foundation Garden 317-320. [Crossref]
850. Nekruzjon Maxudov, Ali Ozer Ercan, A. Tanju Erdem. Effect of camera-IMU displacement calibration error on tracking
performance 4476-4480. [Crossref]
851. Jasmina Stoyanova, Pedro Quelhas Brito, Petia Georgieva, Mariofanna Milanova. Comparison of consumer purchase
intention between interactive and augmented reality shopping platforms through statistical analyses 1-8. [Crossref]
852. Tiago Dias, Pedro Miraldo, Nuno Goncalves, Pedro U. Lima. Augmented reality on robot navigation using non-central
catadioptric cameras 4999-5004. [Crossref]
853. Jia Zhang, Tzu-Chien Liu, Yao-Ting Sung, Kuo-En Chang. Using Augmented Reality to Promote Homogeneity in
Learning Achievement 1-5. [Crossref]
854. Felix Bork, Bernhard Fuers, Anja-Katharina Schneider, Francisco Pinto, Christoph Graumann, Nassir Navab. Auditory
and Visio-Temporal Distance Coding for 3-Dimensional Perception in Medical Augmented Reality 7-12. [Crossref]
855. Stephan Lukosch, Mark Billinghurst, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, Steven Feiner, Leila Alem. Collaboration in Mediated and
Augmented Reality (CiMAR) Summary 1-2. [Crossref]
856. Danilo Pianini, Angelo Croatti, Alessandro Ricci, Mirko Viroli. Computational Fields Meet Augmented Reality:
Perspectives and Challenges 80-85. [Crossref]
857. Shin, Yun Kyung. 2015. Study on the Self Assessment of Reading Education within Smart Learning. Journal of CheongRam
Korean Language Education null:55, 267-295. [Crossref]
858. Qiwei Wang, Dewen Cheng, Qichao Hou, Yuan Hu, Yongtian Wang. Design and stray light analysis of ultra-thin
geometrical waveguide 961815. [Crossref]
859. KOSUKE UNO, GENZO NAITO, YOHEI TOBISA, LUI YOSHIDA, YUTARO OGAWA, KIYOSHI KOTANI,
YASUHIKO JIMBO. 2015. Basic Investigation of Brain-Computer Interface Combined with Augmented Reality and
Development of an Improvement Method Using the Nontarget Object. Electronics and Communications in Japan 98:8,
9-15. [Crossref]
860. Bernhard Jung, Matthias Lenk, Arnd Vitzthum. 2015. Structured development of 3D applications: round-trip engineering
in interdisciplinary teams. Computer Science - Research and Development 30:3-4, 285-301. [Crossref]
861. Vasileios Lahanas, Constantinos Loukas, Nikolaos Smailis, Evangelos Georgiou. 2015. A novel augmented reality simulator
for skills assessment in minimal invasive surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 29:8, 2224-2234. [Crossref]
862. Mi Jeong Kim, Ju Hyun Lee, Xiangyu Wang, Jeong Tai Kim. 2015. Health Smart Home Services incorporating a MAR-
based Energy Consumption Awareness System. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 79:3-4, 523-535. [Crossref]
863. Chris Lonergan, Nicholas Hedley. 2015. Navigating the future of tsunami risk communication: using dimensionality,
interactivity and situatedness to interface with society. Natural Hazards 78:1, 179-201. [Crossref]
864. Maja Wrzesien, Cristina Botella, Juana Bretón-López, Eva del Río González, Jean-Marie Burkhardt, Mariano Alcañiz,
María Ángeles Pérez-Ara. 2015. Treating small animal phobias using a projective-augmented reality system: A single-case
study. Computers in Human Behavior 49, 343-353. [Crossref]
865. Nadim Mahmud, Jonah Cohen, Kleovoulos Tsourides, Tyler M. Berzin. 2015. Computer vision and augmented reality in
gastrointestinal endoscopy: Figure 1. Gastroenterology Report 3:3, 179-184. [Crossref]
866. Siddharth Gulati, Abhinav Rastogi, Manish K Thakur. Dynamic simulator and planning tool for studying the defense
and attack strategies in a war-zone 138-143. [Crossref]
867. Lim Kok Cheng, Fatimah Puteh, Ali Selamat, Farhan bin Mohamed. A review of recent methodologies in English language
content delivery 169-174. [Crossref]
868. B Remya Mohan, Kamal Bijlani, R Jayakrishnan. Simulating consequences of smoking with Augmented Reality 919-924.
[Crossref]
869. Tan Siok Yee, Haslina Arshad, Azizi Abdullah. Development of a PC-based markerless augmented reality 49-53. [Crossref]
870. Bakhreza A Talip. Dimension of structural usability for Augmented Reality system 34-39. [Crossref]
871. Jairo Calmon, Joao Queiroz, Claudio Goes, Angelo Loula. Augmented Tattoo: Evaluation of an Augmented Reality System
for Tattoo Visualization 265-272. [Crossref]
872. Kun-Ming Yu, Jo-Chi Chiu, Ming-Gong Lee, Shih-Shih Chi. A mobile application for an ecological campus navigation
system using augmented reality 17-22. [Crossref]
873. Kuo-Chen Li, Chung-Wei Tsai, Cheng-Ting Chen, Shein-Yung Cheng, Jia-Sheng Heh. The design of immersive English
learning environment using augmented reality 174-179. [Crossref]
874. Ju-Ling Shih, Jyun-Fong Guo, Cheng-ping Chen. Sustaining mobile learning with pervasive game 173-192. [Crossref]
875. Chiuhsiang Joe Lin, Bereket Haile Woldegiorgis. 2015. Interaction and visual performance in stereoscopic displays: A
review. Journal of the Society for Information Display 23:7, 319-332. [Crossref]
876. Li Ge, Falko Kuester. 2015. Integrative Simulation Environment for Conceptual Structural Analysis. Journal of Computing
in Civil Engineering 29:4, B4014004. [Crossref]
877. Arezoo Shirazi, Amir H. Behzadan. 2015. Design and Assessment of a Mobile Augmented Reality-Based Information
Delivery Tool for Construction and Civil Engineering Curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education
and Practice 141:3, 04014012. [Crossref]
878. Ahmet Kermen, Tarkan Aydin, Ali Ozer Ercan, Tanju Erdem. A multi-sensor integrated head-mounted display setup for
augmented reality applications 1-4. [Crossref]
879. Jun Lee, Jeonghwan Lee, Sora Lim, Yongjin Kwon. A Mobile Augmented Reality Service Model Based on Street Data,
and Its Implementation 240-247. [Crossref]
880. George Koutromanos, Georgios Styliaras. "The buildings speak about our city": A location based augmented reality game
1-6. [Crossref]
881. Christos A. Fidas, Nikolaos M. Avouris. Personalization of mobile applications in cultural heritage environments 1-6.
[Crossref]
882. Leila Besharati Tabrizi, Mehran Mahvash. 2015. Augmented reality–guided neurosurgery: accuracy and intraoperative
application of an image projection technique. Journal of Neurosurgery 123:1, 206-211. [Crossref]
883. Yuta Nakashima, Yusuke Uno, Norihiko Kawai, Tomokazu Sato, Naokazu Yokoya. 2015. AR image generation using view-
dependent geometry modification and texture mapping. Virtual Reality 19:2, 83-94. [Crossref]
884. Tseng-Lung Huang, Shuling Liao. 2015. A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the
moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research 15:2, 269-295. [Crossref]
885. Michele Di Donato, Michele Fiorentino, Antonio E. Uva, Michele Gattullo, Giuseppe Monno. 2015. Text legibility for
projected Augmented Reality on industrial workbenches. Computers in Industry 70, 70-78. [Crossref]
886. Samara Soares Nunes, Valeria Farinazzo Martins, Ana Grasielle Dionisio Correa. Open educational resources to support
musical education 1-6. [Crossref]
887. Shuo Niu, D. Scott McCrickard, Steve Harrison. Exploring humanoid factors of robots through transparent and reflective
interactions 47-54. [Crossref]
888. Mingming Fan, Qiong Liu, Hao Tang, Patrick Chiu. POLI: Interactive multimedia authoring and retrieval on mobile
phone by leveraging its audio channel and coded light 1-6. [Crossref]
889. Haiying Zhao, Hong Peng, Changping Sun. A Mobile Service Platform for Xinjiang Tourism 26-30. [Crossref]
890. D. Furió, M.-C. Juan, I. Seguí, R. Vivó. 2015. Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31:3, 189-201. [Crossref]
891. Márcia Regina de Freitas, Regina Coeli Ruschel. 2015. Validação de aplicativo comercial visando a incorporação da realidade
aumentada a um modelo de avaliação pós-ocupação. Ambiente Construído 15:2, 97-112. [Crossref]
892. Ineke J. M. van der Ham, Annemarie M. E. Faber, Matthijs Venselaar, Marc J. van Kreveld, Maarten Löffler. 2015.
Ecological validity of virtual environments to assess human navigation ability. Frontiers in Psychology 6. . [Crossref]
893. Su-Ju Lu, Ying-Chieh Liu. 2015. Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine
education. Environmental Education Research 21:4, 525-541. [Crossref]
894. Rafael Radkowski, Jordan Herrema, James Oliver. 2015. Augmented Reality-Based Manual Assembly Support With
Visual Features for Different Degrees of Difficulty. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31:5, 337-349.
[Crossref]
895. Bojan Kraut, Jelena Jeknic. Improving education experience with augmented reality (AR) 755-760. [Crossref]
896. John Kim. 2015. The origin of the see-through graphical interface. Convergence: The International Journal of Research
into New Media Technologies 21:2, 213-227. [Crossref]
897. Taeyoo Chun, No Hyun Park. 2015. The Effect of Augmented Reality Traits on Presence, Flow, and Relational
Continuance Behavior with Smart-Phones. Journal of Distribution Science 13:5, 45-52. [Crossref]
898. Amir H. Behzadan, Suyang Dong, Vineet R. Kamat. 2015. Augmented reality visualization: A review of civil infrastructure
system applications. Advanced Engineering Informatics 29:2, 252-267. [Crossref]
899. Luís Pádua, Telmo Adão, David Narciso, António Cunha, Luís Magalhães, Emanuel Peres. 2015. Towards Modern Cost-
effective and Lightweight Augmented Reality Setups. International Journal of Web Portals 7:2, 33-59. [Crossref]
900. Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Eliot Winer. A method for real-time generation of augmented reality work instructions via expert
movements 93920G. [Crossref]
901. Fumio Okura, Masayuki Kanbara, Naokazu Yokoya. 2015. Mixed-Reality World Exploration Using Image-Based
Rendering. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 8:2, 1-26. [Crossref]
902. Tony Liao. 2015. Augmented or admented reality? The influence of marketing on augmented reality technologies.
Information, Communication & Society 18:3, 310-326. [Crossref]
903. Giles Westerfield, Antonija Mitrovic, Mark Billinghurst. 2015. Intelligent Augmented Reality Training for Motherboard
Assembly. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 25:1, 157-172. [Crossref]
904. Nadia Zenati, Mahfoud Hamidia, Abdelkader Bellarbi, Samir Benbelkacem. E-maintenance for photovoltaic power system
in Algeria 2594-2599. [Crossref]
905. R. Ortega-Palacios, J. C. Salgado-Ramirez, J. A. Valdez-Hernandez. Gait Analysis System by Augmented Reality 1-4.
[Crossref]
906. Tomohiro Sueishi, Hiromasa Oku, Masatoshi Ishikawa. Robust high-speed tracking against illumination changes for
dynamic projection mapping 97-104. [Crossref]
907. V. Havard, D. Baudry, A. Louis, B. Mazari. Augmented reality maintenance demonstrator and associated modelling
329-330. [Crossref]
908. Shu-Rong Yang, Jia-Ruey Chang, Heng-Min Lin, Kun-Hu Lin. 2015. Identification of Manholes Beneath Pavements
Using RFID and AR Technologies. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 43:2, 20140136. [Crossref]
909. Xiaodong Wei, Dongdong Weng, Yue Liu, Yongtian Wang. 2015. Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical
creative design course. Computers & Education 81, 221-234. [Crossref]
910. Somsak Techakosit, Panita Wannapiroon. 2015. Connectivism Learning Environment in Augmented Reality Science
Laboratory to Enhance Scientific Literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174, 2108-2115. [Crossref]
911. Jae-Ho Ryu. 2015. Development of Augmented Reality Tool for Architectural Design. Journal of the Korea Society of
Computer and Information 20:1, 49-62. [Crossref]
912. Jan Apotheker, Ingeborg Veenstra. Twenty-First Century Skills: Using theWeb in Chemistry Education 563-594.
[Crossref]
913. Nathan Prestopnik, Ping Zhang. Human-Computer Interaction (HCI): Interactivity, Immersion, and Invisibility as New
Extensions 1-6. [Crossref]
914. Hoshang Kolivand, Alhajhamad Hasan Zakaria, Mohd Shahrizal Sunar. 2015. Shadow Generation in Mixed Reality: A
Comprehensive Survey. IETE Technical Review 32:1, 3-15. [Crossref]
915. Ulrik Ekman. Design as Topology: U-City 177-201. [Crossref]
916. Rawia Frikha, Ridha Ejbali, Mourad Zaied, Chokri Ben Amar. Natural Gesture Based Interaction with Virtual Heart in
Augmented Reality 457-465. [Crossref]
917. Yuxia Zhou, Minjuan Wang. Tangible User Interfaces in Learning and Education 20-25. [Crossref]
918. A. Bechar, S.Y. Nof, J.P. Wachs. 2015. A review and framework of laser-based collaboration support. Annual Reviews in
Control 39, 30-45. [Crossref]
919. Chiuhsiang Joe Lin, Bereket Haile Woldegiorgis, Dino Caesaron, Lai-Yu Cheng. 2015. Distance estimation with mixed
real and virtual targets in stereoscopic displays. Displays 36, 41-48. [Crossref]
920. N. Soete, A. Claeys, S. Hoedt, B. Mahy, J. Cottyn. 2015. Towards Mixed Reality in SCADA Applications. IFAC-
PapersOnLine 48:3, 2417-2422. [Crossref]
921. Miao Qu, Yikang Hou, Yourong Xu, Congcong Shen, Ming Zhu, Le Xie, Hao Wang, Yan Zhang, Gang Chai. 2015.
Precise positioning of an intraoral distractor using augmented reality in patients with hemifacial microsomia. Journal of
Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 43:1, 106-112. [Crossref]
922. G. Dini, M. Dalle Mura. 2015. Application of Augmented Reality Techniques in Through-life Engineering Services.
Procedia CIRP 38, 14-23. [Crossref]
923. Adithya Thaduri, Diego Galar, Uday Kumar. 2015. Railway Assets: A Potential Domain for Big Data Analytics. Procedia
Computer Science 53, 457-467. [Crossref]
924. Febndy Kwik, Raymond Bahana. 2015. Using Augmented Reality to Enhance Aetherpet, a Prototype of a Social Game.
Procedia Computer Science 59, 282-290. [Crossref]
925. Luís Pádua, David Narciso, Telmo Adão, Antonio Cunha, Emanuel Peres, Luís Magalhães. 2015. Cost-effective and
Lightweight Mobile Units for MixAR: A Comparative Trial among Different Setups. Procedia Computer Science 64,
870-878. [Crossref]
926. David Narciso, Luís Pádua, Telmo Adão, Emanuel Peres, Luís Magalhães. 2015. MixAR Mobile Prototype: Visualizing
Virtually Reconstructed Ancient Structures In Situ. Procedia Computer Science 64, 852-861. [Crossref]
927. Manuel Mendoza, Miguel Mendoza, Eloy Mendoza, Eduardo González. 2015. Augmented Reality as a Tool of Training
for Data Collection on Torque Auditing. Procedia Computer Science 75, 5-11. [Crossref]
928. J. Arámburo-Lizárraga, Jorge C. Sanabria. 2015. An Application for the Study of Art Movements. Procedia Computer
Science 75, 34-42. [Crossref]
929. Vianney Lara-Prieto, Efraín Bravo-Quirino, Miguel Ángel Rivera-Campa, José Enrique Gutiérrez-Arredondo. 2015. An
Innovative Self-learning Approach to 3D Printing Using Multimedia and Augmented Reality on Mobile Devices. Procedia
Computer Science 75, 59-65. [Crossref]
930. Daniel Segovia, Hector Ramírez, Miguel Mendoza, Manuel Mendoza, Eloy Mendoza, Eduardo González. 2015. Machining
and Dimensional Validation Training Using Augmented Reality for a Lean Process. Procedia Computer Science 75, 195-204.
[Crossref]
931. Fernando Suárez-Warden, Eduardo González Mendívil, Ciro A. Rodríguez, Salvador Garcia-Lumbreras. 2015. Assembly
Operations Aided by Augmented Reality: An Endeavour toward a Comparative Analysis. Procedia Computer Science 75,
281-290. [Crossref]
932. Daniel Segovia, Miguel Mendoza, Eloy Mendoza, Eduardo González. 2015. Augmented Reality as a Tool for Production
and Quality Monitoring. Procedia Computer Science 75, 291-300. [Crossref]
933. A. Perdikakis, A. Araya, D. Kiritsis. 2015. Introducing Augmented Reality in Next Generation Industrial Learning Tools:
A Case Study on Electric and Hybrid Vehicles. Procedia Engineering 132, 251-258. [Crossref]
934. Chien-Hsu Chen, I-Jui Lee, Ling-Yi Lin. 2015. Augmented reality-based self-facial modeling to promote the emotional
expression and social skills of adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Developmental Disabilities 36,
396-403. [Crossref]
935. Graceline Williams, Masoud Gheisari, Po-Jui Chen, Javier Irizarry. 2015. BIM2MAR: An Efficient BIM Translation to
Mobile Augmented Reality Applications. Journal of Management in Engineering 31:1, A4014009. [Crossref]
936. Yujie Lu, Yongkui Li, Miroslaw Skibniewski, Zhilei Wu, Runshi Wang, Yun Le. 2015. Information and Communication
Technology Applications in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Organizations: A 15-Year Review. Journal of
Management in Engineering 31:1, A4014010. [Crossref]
937. Yuhang Zhao, Sarit Szpiro, Shiri Azenkot. ForeSee 239-249. [Crossref]
938. Richard McPherson, Suman Jana, Vitaly Shmatikov. No Escape From Reality 743-753. [Crossref]
939. Nur Intan Adhani M. Nazri, Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli, Azfar Tomi. A mobile augmented reality game design
approach for on product advertising 1-8. [Crossref]
940. Günter Alce, Mattias Wallergård, Klas Hermodsson. 2015. WozARd: A Wizard of Oz Method for Wearable Augmented
Reality Interaction—A Pilot Study. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2015, 1-10. [Crossref]
941. Chung-Hung Hsieh, Jiann-Der Lee. 2015. Markerless Augmented Reality via Stereo Video See-Through Head-Mounted
Display Device. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2015, 1-13. [Crossref]
942. Irene Alice Chicchi Giglioli, Federica Pallavicini, Elisa Pedroli, Silvia Serino, Giuseppe Riva. 2015. Augmented Reality: A
Brand New Challenge for the Assessment and Treatment of Psychological Disorders. Computational and Mathematical
Methods in Medicine 2015, 1-12. [Crossref]
943. Ramón Iván Barraza Castillo, Vianey Guadalupe Cruz Sánchez, Osslan Osiris Vergara Villegas. 2015. A Pilot Study on
the Use of Mobile Augmented Reality for Interactive Experimentation in Quadratic Equations. Mathematical Problems in
Engineering 2015, 1-13. [Crossref]
944. Wei-Chieh Chang. 2015. Streamlined Workflow for 3D Modeling with Animated Characters. Journal of Software 10:7,
912-918. [Crossref]
945. Kenya Sato, Naoya Sakamoto, Hideki Shimada. 2015. Visualization and Management Platform with Augmented Reality
for Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Sensor Network 07:01, 1-11. [Crossref]
946. Jun CHEN, Takashi YAMAMOTO, Tadayoshi AOYAMA, Takeshi TAKAKI, Idaku ISHII. 2015. Real-Time Projection
Mapping Using High-Frame-Rate Structured Light 3D Vision. SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System
Integration 8:4, 265-272. [Crossref]
947. Claudia Lemke, Walter Brenner. Infrastruktur im digitalen Zeitalter 89-138. [Crossref]
948. Takeshi Matsui, Yuichi Katagiri, Hideki Katagiri, Kosuke Kato. 2015. Automatic Feature Point Selection through Hybrid
Metaheauristics based on Tabu Search and Memetic Algorithm for Augmented Reality. Procedia Computer Science 60,
1120-1127. [Crossref]
949. Jie Jiang, Yang Kuang. 2015. The Research of Developing Virtual Jewelry Worn System Based on ARToolkit. Applied
Mechanics and Materials 713-715, 2382-2386. [Crossref]
950. Sha Liang. 2015. Research Proposal on Reviewing Augmented Reality Applications for Supporting Ageing Population.
Procedia Manufacturing 3, 219-226. [Crossref]
951. Neil Hall, Christopher Lowe, Robin Hirsch. 2015. Human Factors Considerations for the Application of Augmented
Reality in an Operational Railway Environment. Procedia Manufacturing 3, 799-806. [Crossref]
952. Annie Pauzie. Head Up Display in Automotive: A New Reality for the Driver 505-516. [Crossref]
953. Nicolás Gazcón, Silvia Castro. ARBS: An Interactive and Collaborative System for Augmented Reality Books 89-108.
[Crossref]
954. Hanna Schraffenberger, Edwin Van der Heide. 2014. Everything Augmented: On the Real in Augmented Reality. Journal
of Science and Technology of the Arts 6:1, 17. [Crossref]
955. Anuar Mohd Yusof, Esther Gnanamalar Sarojini Daniel, Wah Yun Low, Kamarulzaman Ab. Aziz. 2014. Teachers’
perception of mobile edutainment for special needs learners: the Malaysian case. International Journal of Inclusive Education
18:12, 1237-1246. [Crossref]
956. Hoshang Kolivand, Zakiah Noh, Mohd Shahrizal Sunar. 2014. A quadratic spline approximation using detail multi-layer
for soft shadow generation in augmented reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications 73:3, 1225-1245. [Crossref]
957. Tomohiro Fukuda, Tian Zhang, Nobuyoshi Yabuki. 2014. Improvement of registration accuracy of a handheld augmented
reality system for urban landscape simulation. Frontiers of Architectural Research 3:4, 386-397. [Crossref]
958. L. Barbieri, F. Bruno, F. Cosco, M. Muzzupappa. 2014. Effects of device obtrusion and tool-hand misalignment on user
performance and stiffness perception in visuo-haptic mixed reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72:12,
846-859. [Crossref]
959. Negin Minaei. 2014. Do modes of transportation and GPS affect cognitive maps of Londoners?. Transportation Research
Part A: Policy and Practice 70, 162-180. [Crossref]
960. Hanyuool Kim, Issei Takahashi, Hiroki Yamamoto, Satoshi Maekawa, Takeshi Naemura. 2014. MARIO: Mid-air
Augmented Reality Interaction with Objects. Entertainment Computing 5:4, 233-241. [Crossref]
961. J. Zhu, S. K. Ong, A. Y. C. Nee. 2014. A context-aware augmented reality system to assist the maintenance operators.
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 8:4, 293-304. [Crossref]
962. Pasquale Daponte, Luca De Vito, Francesco Picariello, Maria Riccio. 2014. State of the art and future developments of the
Augmented Reality for measurement applications. Measurement 57, 53-70. [Crossref]
963. Telmo Zarraonandia, Ignacio Aedo, Paloma Díaz, Alvaro Montero Montes. 2014. Augmented Presentations: Supporting
the Communication in Presentations by Means of Augmented Reality. International Journal of Human-Computer
Interaction 30:10, 829-838. [Crossref]
964. Hung-Yuan Wang, Henry Been-Lirn Duh, Nai Li, Tzung-Jin Lin, Chin-Chung Tsai. 2014. An Investigation of University
Students’ Collaborative Inquiry Learning Behaviors in an Augmented Reality Simulation and a Traditional Simulation.
Journal of Science Education and Technology 23:5, 682-691. [Crossref]
965. Hoshang Kolivand, Mohd Shahrizal Sunar. 2014. Covering photo-realistic properties of outdoor components with the
effects of sky color in mixed reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications 72:3, 2143-2162. [Crossref]
966. Michelle L. Rusch, Mark C. Schall, Jr., John D. Lee, Jeffrey D. Dawson, Matthew Rizzo. 2014. Augmented reality cues
to assist older drivers with gap estimation for left-turns. Accident Analysis & Prevention 71, 210-221. [Crossref]
967. Peter Sommerauer, Oliver Müller. 2014. Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a
mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education 79, 59-68. [Crossref]
968. Arindam Dey, Christian Sandor. 2014. Lessons learned: Evaluating visualizations for occluded objects in handheld
augmented reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72:10-11, 704-716. [Crossref]
969. Sevda Kucuk, Rabia M. Yilmaz, Yuksel Goktas. Effective educational augmented reality applications: Points to consider
1-4. [Crossref]
970. Hoshang Kolivand, Mohd Shahrizal Sunar. 2014. Realistic Real-Time Outdoor Rendering in Augmented Reality. PLoS
ONE 9:9, e108334. [Crossref]
971. Colin Berry, Jason Board. 2014. A Protein in the palm of your hand through augmented reality. Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology Education 42:5, 446-449. [Crossref]
972. Carolien Kamphuis, Esther Barsom, Marlies Schijven, Noor Christoph. 2014. Augmented reality in medical education?.
Perspectives on Medical Education 3:4, 300-311. [Crossref]
973. Tosti H.C. Chiang, Stephen J.H. Yang, Gwo-Jen Hwang. 2014. Students' online interactive patterns in augmented reality-
based inquiry activities. Computers & Education 78, 97-108. [Crossref]
974. Víctor Fernández, Juan Manuel Orduña, Pedro Morillo. 2014. Server implementations for improving the performance of
CAR systems based on mobile phones. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 44, 72-82. [Crossref]
975. E. Loeliger, T. Stockman. 2014. Wayfinding without Visual Cues: Evaluation of an Interactive Audio Map System.
Interacting with Computers 26:5, 403-416. [Crossref]
976. Qing Rao, Tobias Tropper, Christian Grunler, Markus Hammori, Samarjit Chakraborty. AR-IVI &이x2014;
Implementation of In-Vehicle Augmented Reality 3-8. [Crossref]
977. Thammathip Piumsomboon, David Altimira, Hyungon Kim, Adrian Clark, Gun Lee, Mark Billinghurst. Grasp-Shell vs
gesture-speech: A comparison of direct and indirect natural interaction techniques in augmented reality 73-82. [Crossref]
978. Seungwon Kim, Gun Lee, Nobuchika Sakata, Mark Billinghurst. Improving co-presence with augmented visual
communication cues for sharing experience through video conference 83-92. [Crossref]
979. Feng Zheng, Dieter Schmalstieg, Greg Welch. Pixel-wise closed-loop registration in video-based augmented reality
135-143. [Crossref]
980. Luca F. Bertuccelli, Taimoor Khawaja, Bruce N. Walker, Paul O'Neill. [Poster] Ongoing development of a user-centered,
AR testbed in industry 253-254. [Crossref]
981. Brady Patzer, Dustin C. Smith, Joseph R. Keebler. 2014. Novelty and Retention for Two Augmented Reality Learning
Systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58:1, 1164-1168. [Crossref]
 982. Joseph R. Keebler, Elizabeth H. Lazzara, Brady Patzer. 2014. Building a Simulated Medical Augmented Reality Training
System. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58:1, 1169-1173. [Crossref]
983. Benjamin J. Dixon, Michael J. Daly, Harley H.L. Chan, Allan Vescan, Ian J. Witterick, Jonathan C. Irish. 2014.
Inattentional Blindness Increased with Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy
28:5, 433-437. [Crossref]
984. Iulian Radu. 2014. Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous
Computing 18:6, 1533-1543. [Crossref]
985. Mikel Zorrilla, Angel Martin, Jairo R. Sanchez, Iñigo Tamayo, Igor G. Olaizola. 2014. HTML5-based system for
interoperable 3D digital home applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications 71:2, 533-553. [Crossref]
986. M.-T. Yang, Y.-C. Chiu. 2014. Note-Taking for 3D Curricular Contents using Markerless Augmented Reality. Interacting
with Computers 26:4, 321-333. [Crossref]
987. Young-Sook Park, Dea-Woo Park. 2014. Study of Educational Insect Robot that Utilizes Mobile Augmented Reality
Digilog Book. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering 18:6, 1355-1360. [Crossref]
988. Ming-Chang Wen, Shih-Chung Kang. Augmented Reality and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Assist in Construction
Management 1570-1577. [Crossref]
989. S. Garrido-Jurado, R. Muñoz-Salinas, F.J. Madrid-Cuevas, M.J. Marín-Jiménez. 2014. Automatic generation and detection
of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion. Pattern Recognition 47:6, 2280-2292. [Crossref]
990. Mi Jeong Kim, Myung Eun Cho. 2014. Studying children's tactile problem-solving in a digital environment. Thinking
Skills and Creativity 12, 1-13. [Crossref]
991. Sarah Kenderdine, Leith K. Y. Chan, Jeffrey Shaw. 2014. Pure Land. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 7:2,
1-15. [Crossref]
992. Graceline Williams, Masoud Gheisari, Javier Irizarry. Issues of Translating BIM for Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR)
Environments 100-109. [Crossref]
993. Masoud Gheisari, Shane Goodman, Justin Schmidt, Graceline Williams, Javier Irizarry. Exploring BIM and Mobile
Augmented Reality Use in Facilities Management 1941-1950. [Crossref]
994. Jun Chen, Takashi Yamamoto, Tadayoshi Aoyama, Takeshi Takaki, Idaku Ishii. Simultaneous projection mapping using
high-frame-rate depth vision 4506-4511. [Crossref]
995. Enrico Coiera. 2014. Communication spaces. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 21:3, 414-422.
[Crossref]
996. Tien-Chi Huang. 2014. Antistray, Learning Smart: Creating Indoor Positioning Learning Environment for Augmenting
Self-Regulated Learning. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 10:4, 427675. [Crossref]
997. Jia Zhang, Yao-Ting Sung, Huei-Tse Hou, Kuo-En Chang. 2014. The development and evaluation of an augmented
reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education 73, 178-188. [Crossref]
998. Mahfoud Hamidia, Nadia Zenati-Henda, Hayet Belghit, Mahmoud Belhocine. Markerless tracking using interest window
for augmented reality applications 20-25. [Crossref]
999. Nadia Zenati-Henda, Abdelkader Bellarbi, Samir Benbelkacem, Mahmoud Belhocine. Augmented reality system based on
hand gestures for remote maintenance 5-8. [Crossref]
1000. Mau-Tsuen Yang, Wan-Che Liao. 2014. Computer-Assisted Culture Learning in an Online Augmented Reality
Environment Based on Free-Hand Gesture Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 7:2, 107-117.
[Crossref]
1001. Yuichiro Fujimoto, Ross T. Smith, Takafumi Taketomi, Goshiro Yamamoto, Jun Miyazaki, Hirokazu Kato, Bruce H.
Thomas. 2014. Geometrically-Correct Projection-Based Texture Mapping onto a Deformable Object. IEEE Transactions
on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20:4, 540-549. [Crossref]
1002. Mohd Afizi Mohd Shukran, Kamaruzaman Maskat, Wan Sharil Sham Sharif, Mohd Sidek Fadhil Bin Mohd Yunus, Mohd
Suhaili Ariffin. 2014. Proposed System Model for Android Augmented Reality System in Malaysia Military Operations –
Unit Positions. Applied Mechanics and Materials 548-549, 1493-1497. [Crossref]
1003. L. De Marchi, A. Ceruti, N. Testoni, A. Marzani, A. Liverani. Use of augmented reality in aircraft maintenance operations
906412. [Crossref]
1004. Barbara Grüter, Nassrin Hajinejad, Iaroslav Sheptykin. Mobile Game Play and Everyday Life 444-470. [Crossref]
1005. Lyuba Encheva, Isabel Pedersen. 2014. ‘One Day…': Google 's Project Glass, integral reality and predictive advertising.
Continuum 28:2, 235-246. [Crossref]
1006. Oliver Baus, Stéphane Bouchard. 2014. Moving from Virtual Reality Exposure-Based Therapy to Augmented Reality
Exposure-Based Therapy: A Review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8. . [Crossref]
1007. M.B. de Paula, C.R. Jung, L.G. da Silveira. 2014. Automatic on-the-fly extrinsic camera calibration of onboard vehicular
cameras. Expert Systems with Applications 41:4, 1997-2007. [Crossref]
1008. Javier Irizarry, Masoud Gheisari, Graceline Williams, Kathy Roper. 2014. Ambient intelligence environments for accessing
building information. Facilities 32:3/4, 120-138. [Crossref]
1009. Tae-Ho Kim, Kyung-Ho Kim, Yunsang Han, Seok-Han Lee, Jong-Soo Choi. 2014. Implementation of Constructor-
Oriented Visualization System for Occluded Construction via Mobile Augmented-Reality. Journal of the Institute of
Electronics and Information Engineers 51:2, 55-68. [Crossref]
1010. Chia-Yen Chen, Bao Rong Chang, Po-Sen Huang. 2014. Multimedia augmented reality information system for museum
guidance. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18:2, 315-322. [Crossref]
1011. S. Filippi, D. Barattin. 2014. A selection algorithm for prototyping activities. International Journal on Interactive Design
and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 8:1, 1-11. [Crossref]
1012. María Blanca Ibáñez, Ángela Di Serio, Diego Villarán, Carlos Delgado Kloos. 2014. Experimenting with electromagnetism
using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education 71,
1-13. [Crossref]
1013. Tseng-Lung Huang, Feng Hsu Liu. 2014. Formation of augmented-reality interactive technology's persuasive effects from
the perspective of experiential value. Internet Research 24:1, 82-109. [Crossref]
1014. Lutz Schega, Daniel Hamacher, Sandra Erfuth, Wolfgang Behrens-Baumann, Juliane Reupsch, Michael B. Hoffmann.
2014. Differential effects of head-mounted displays on visual performance. Ergonomics 57:1, 1-11. [Crossref]
1015. Matt Bower, Cathie Howe, Nerida McCredie, Austin Robinson, David Grover. 2014. Augmented Reality in education –
cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International 51:1, 1-15. [Crossref]
1016. . References 721-803. [Crossref]
1017. Weiqin Chen. 2014. Historical Oslo on a Handheld Device – A Mobile Augmented Reality Application. Procedia Computer
Science 35, 979-985. [Crossref]
1018. Hideki Ozaki, Ryutaro Yamada, Seiji Tamiya, Hideho Miura, Ryo Sugiura. 2014. Use a Smartphone Camera to Estimate
Chlorophyll and Anthocyanin Contents in Potato Skin. Agricultural Information Research 23:3, 132-139. [Crossref]
1019. Chih-Hsiao Tsai, Jung-Chuan Yen. 2014. The Augmented Reality Application of Multimedia Technology in Aquatic
Organisms Instruction. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications 07:09, 745-755. [Crossref]
1020. Kamarulzaman Ab. Aziz, Tan Gek Siang. 2014. Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Combination as a Holistic
Application for Heritage Preservation in the UNESCO World Heritage Site of Melaka. International Journal of Social
Science and Humanity 4:5, 333-338. [Crossref]
1021. Igor Giuliano, Teresa Taurino. Augmented-Reality Application for a Seru-type Manufacturing as Lean as Possible 463-470.
[Crossref]
1022. Peng Cheng Fan, Xiao Yan Xu. 2014. AR Technology and its Application in Biomedical Engineering. Applied Mechanics
and Materials 472, 421-426. [Crossref]
1023. Søren S. Sørensen. Augmented Reality for Improved Communication of Construction and Maintenance Plans in Nuclear
Power Plants 269-274. [Crossref]
1024. Heinrich Holland, Beate Koch. Mobile Marketing 431-458. [Crossref]
1025. Giuliana Guazzaroni. Street Poetry in Augmented Reality 178-197. [Crossref]
1026. Roy Damgrave. Augmented Reality 66-67. [Crossref]
1027. Ji In So, Sun-Hee Kim. 2013. The effects of augmented reality fashion application on pleasure, satisfaction and behavioral
intention. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture 21:6, 810-826. [Crossref]
1028. Marcus Tönnis, David A. Plecher, Gudrun Klinker. 2013. Representing information – Classifying the Augmented Reality
presentation space. Computers & Graphics 37:8, 997-1011. [Crossref]
1029. J. Gimeno, P. Morillo, J.M. Orduña, M. Fernández. 2013. A new AR authoring tool using depth maps for industrial
procedures. Computers in Industry 64:9, 1263-1271. [Crossref]
1030. Shireen Y. Elhabian, Aly A. Farag. 2013. Towards efficient image irradiance modelling of convex Lambertian surfaces
under single viewpoint and frontal illumination. IET Computer Vision 7:6, 478-487. [Crossref]
1031. Da-Ren Chen, Mu-Yen Chen, Tien-Chi Huang, Wen-Pao Hsu. 2013. Developing a Mobile Learning System in
Augmented Reality Context. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 9:12, 594627. [Crossref]
1032. 이이이, 이이이. 2013. The effects of augmented reality fashion application on pleasure, satisfaction and behavioral intention.
The Research Journal of the Costume Culture 21:6, 810-826. [Crossref]
1033. Abd Majid Nazatul Aini, Haslina Arshad. 2013. Towards the Integration of Mobile Augmented Reality within an
Aluminium Process Fault Detection and Diagnosis System. Advanced Materials Research 845, 703-707. [Crossref]
1034. Suyang Dong, Vineet R Kamat. 2013. SMART: scalable and modular augmented reality template for rapid development
of engineering visualization applications. Visualization in Engineering 1:1. . [Crossref]
1035. Julie A. Kientz, Matthew S. Goodwin, Gillian R. Hayes, Gregory D. Abowd. 2013. Interactive Technologies for Autism.
Synthesis Lectures on Assistive, Rehabilitative, and Health-Preserving Technologies 2:2, 1-177. [Crossref]
1036. Z.B. Wang, L.X. Ng, S.K. Ong, A.Y.C. Nee. 2013. Assembly planning and evaluation in an augmented reality environment.
International Journal of Production Research 51:23-24, 7388-7404. [Crossref]
1037. Z. B. Wang, S. K. Ong, A. Y. C. Nee. 2013. Augmented reality aided interactive manual assembly design. The International
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 69:5-8, 1311-1321. [Crossref]
1038. Minkyung Lee, Mark Billinghurst, Woonhyuk Baek, Richard Green, Woontack Woo. 2013. A usability study of
multimodal input in an augmented reality environment. Virtual Reality 17:4, 293-305. [Crossref]
1039. C.N. Verdouw, A.J.M. Beulens, J.G.A.J. van der Vorst. 2013. Virtualisation of floricultural supply chains: A review from
an Internet of Things perspective. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 99, 160-175. [Crossref]
1040. Hui Lin, Min Chen, Guonian Lu, Qing Zhu, Jiahua Gong, Xiong You, Yongning Wen, Bingli Xu, Mingyuan Hu. 2013.
Virtual Geographic Environments (VGEs): A New Generation of Geographic Analysis Tool. Earth-Science Reviews 126,
74-84. [Crossref]
1041. Edmund Ng Giap Weng, Md. Abdullah-Al-Jubair, Shahren Ahmad Zaidi Adruce, Oon Yin Bee. 2013. Graphics, Audio-
visuals and Interaction (GAI) based Handheld Augmented Reality System. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 97,
745-752. [Crossref]
1042. Hirosuke Horii, Yohei Miyajima. 2013. Augmented Reality-based Support System for Teaching Hand-drawn Mechanical
Drawing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 103, 174-180. [Crossref]
1043. Danakorn Nincarean, Mohamad Bilal Alia, Noor Dayana Abdul Halim, Mohd Hishamuddin Abdul Rahman. 2013. Mobile
Augmented Reality: The Potential for Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 103, 657-664. [Crossref]
1044. Anne Bationo-Tillon. 2013. Ergonomie et domaine muséal . Activites 10:2. . [Crossref]
1045. Gerhard Schall, Stefanie Zollmann, Gerhard Reitmayr. 2013. Smart Vidente: advances in mobile augmented reality for
interactive visualization of underground infrastructure. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17:7, 1533-1549. [Crossref]
1046. Ángela Di Serio, María Blanca Ibáñez, Carlos Delgado Kloos. 2013. Impact of an augmented reality system on students'
motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education 68, 586-596. [Crossref]
1047. Rafał Wojciechowski, Wojciech Cellary. 2013. Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality
environments. Computers & Education 68, 570-585. [Crossref]
1048. Keith R. Bujak, Iulian Radu, Richard Catrambone, Blair MacIntyre, Ruby Zheng, Gary Golubski. 2013. A psychological
perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education 68, 536-544. [Crossref]
1049. Tzung-Jin Lin, Henry Been-Lirn Duh, Nai Li, Hung-Yuan Wang, Chin-Chung Tsai. 2013. An investigation of learners'
collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system.
Computers & Education 68, 314-321. [Crossref]
1050. Zhiguo Ren, Wenjing Gai, Fan Zhong, Julien Pettré, Qunsheng Peng. 2013. Inserting virtual pedestrians into pedestrian
groups video with behavior consistency. The Visual Computer 29:9, 927-936. [Crossref]
1051. Frédéric P. A. Vogt, Luke J. Shingles. 2013. Augmented Reality in astrophysics. Astrophysics and Space Science 347:1, 47-60.
[Crossref]
1052. Xiangyu Wang, Peter E.D. Love, Mi Jeong Kim, Chan-Sik Park, Chun-Pong Sing, Lei Hou. 2013. A conceptual
framework for integrating building information modeling with augmented reality. Automation in Construction 34, 37-44.
[Crossref]
1053. Deyi Ma, Yimin Chen, Chen Huang, Qiming Li, Congli Ye, Yun Li, Yangbin Chen. 2013. A fast render algorithm of
virtual and real motion blur consistence in augmented reality. Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics
124:18, 3319-3323. [Crossref]
1054. Wei Ying Li. 2013. The Application of Augmented Reality in Mobile Learning Based on Cloud Computing. Applied
Mechanics and Materials 422, 172-175. [Crossref]
1055. Jeong Hwan Lee, Yong Hee Jang, Yong Jin Kwon. 2013. An Efficient Location Based Service based on Mobile Augmented
Reality applying Street Data extracted from Digital Map. Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society 21:4, 63-70.
[Crossref]
1056. Ki-Young Lee, Sung-Bae Kim, Yun-Seol Kwak, Hee-Jin Kim. 2013. Design and Implementation of AR-based Notification
View System at Subway Arrival Stations. The Journal of the Institute of Webcasting, Internet and Telecommunication 13:4,
135-140. [Crossref]
1057. Sang Min Ko, Won Suk Chang, Yong Gu Ji. 2013. Usability Principles for Augmented Reality Applications in a Smartphone
Environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29:8, 501-515. [Crossref]
1058. Kun-Hung Cheng, Chin-Chung Tsai. 2013. Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for
Future Research. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22:4, 449-462. [Crossref]
1059. Giuseppe Di Gironimo, Rocco Mozzillo, Andrea Tarallo. 2013. From virtual reality to web-based multimedia maintenance
manuals. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 7:3, 183-190. [Crossref]
1060. Javier Irizarry, Masoud Gheisari, Graceline Williams, Bruce N. Walker. 2013. InfoSPOT: A mobile Augmented Reality
method for accessing building information through a situation awareness approach. Automation in Construction 33, 11-23.
[Crossref]
1061. Ming-Der Yang, Chih-Fan Chao, Kai-Siang Huang, Liang-You Lu, Yi-Ping Chen. 2013. Image-based 3D scene
reconstruction and exploration in augmented reality. Automation in Construction 33, 48-60. [Crossref]
1062. Hung-Lin Chi, Shih-Chung Kang, Xiangyu Wang. 2013. Research trends and opportunities of augmented reality
applications in architecture, engineering, and construction. Automation in Construction 33, 116-122. [Crossref]
1063. Jia Ruey Chang, Shu Rong Yang, Kun Hu Lin. 2013. Preliminary Study of Radio Frequency Identification on Underground
Manhole's Surveys. Advanced Materials Research 723, 877-884. [Crossref]
1064. Li Jun Xue, Li Li Wang. 2013. Semantic-Based Three-Dimensional Modeling of Virtual Reality Scenes. Applied Mechanics
and Materials 385-386, 1780-1784. [Crossref]
1065. Min Jing Peng, Bo Li. 2013. An Overview on Augmented Reality Based Mobile Commerce Recommendation. Applied
Mechanics and Materials 347-350, 3297-3301. [Crossref]
1066. Jie Ren, Yao Yu, Yu Zhou, Zi Qiang Wang, Si Dan Du. 2013. AR Based on ORB Feature and KLT Tracking. Applied
Mechanics and Materials 339, 333-340. [Crossref]
1067. Kwang-Ho Shin. 2013. Analysis of Magnetic Concentrator of Magnetic Sensor by Using Finite Element Method. Journal
of the Korean Magnetics Society 23:3, 89-93. [Crossref]
1068. Jaeyong Oh, Sekil Park, Sun-Young Kim, Ohseok Kwon. 2013. Research on Augmented Reality Services in Bridge for
Navigational Safety. Journal of Korean Navigation and port research 37:3, 245-250. [Crossref]
1069. Jinwook Shim, Minje Kong, Hayoung Kim, Seungho Chae, Kyungho Jeong, Jonghoon Seo, Tack-Don Han. 2013.
Augmented Reality Authoring Tool with Marker & Gesture Interactive Features. Journal of Korea Multimedia Society 16:6,
720-734. [Crossref]
1070. Svenja Kahn. 2013. Reducing the gap between Augmented Reality and 3D modeling with real-time depth imaging. Virtual
Reality 17:2, 111-123. [Crossref]
1071. Mark C. Schall, Michelle L. Rusch, John D. Lee, Jeffrey D. Dawson, Geb Thomas, Nazan Aksan, Matthew Rizzo. 2013.
Augmented Reality Cues and Elderly Driver Hazard Perception. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and
Ergonomics Society 55:3, 643-658. [Crossref]
1072. Ozgur Baser, E Ilhan Konukseven. 2013. Kinematic model calibration of a 7-DOF capstan-driven haptic device for pose
and force control accuracy improvement. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical
Engineering Science 227:6, 1328-1340. [Crossref]
1073. Mehran Mahvash, Leila Besharati Tabrizi. 2013. A novel augmented reality system of image projection for image-guided
neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica 155:5, 943-947. [Crossref]
1074. S. Lee, J. Lee, A. Lee, N. Park, S. Lee, S. Song, A. Seo, H. Lee, J.-I. Kim, K. Eom. 2013. Augmented reality intravenous
injection simulator based 3D medical imaging for veterinary medicine. The Veterinary Journal 196:2, 197-202. [Crossref]
1075. Chen Feng, Vineet R. Kamat. 2013. Plane Registration Leveraged by Global Constraints for Context-Aware AEC
Applications. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 28:5, 325-343. [Crossref]
1076. Dovilė Kurpytė. 2013. papildytos realybės algoritmo efektyvumo tyrimas. Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis 5:2, 79-83. [Crossref]
1077. Eunha Park, Jinwoo Jeon. 2013. Developing Korean Learning Contents Using Augmented Reality. The Journal of the
Korea Contents Association 13:4, 459-468. [Crossref]
1078. Mikael B. Skov, Jesper Kjeldskov, Jeni Paay, Niels Husted, Jacob Nørskov, Kenneth Pedersen. 2013. Designing on-
site: Facilitating participatory contextual architecture with mobile phones. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 9:2, 216-227.
[Crossref]
1079. Markus Salo, Thomas Olsson, Markus Makkonen, Antti Hautamäki, Lauri Frank. 2013. Consumer value of camera-based
mobile interaction with the real world. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 9:2, 258-268. [Crossref]
1080. Jeroen G.W. Wildenbeest, David A. Abbink, Cock J.M. Heemskerk, Frans C.T. van der Helm, Henri Boessenkool. 2013.
The Impact of Haptic Feedback Quality on the Performance of Teleoperated Assembly Tasks. IEEE Transactions on
Haptics 6:2, 242-252. [Crossref]
1081. Mark Buesing, Michael Cook. 2013. Augmented Reality Comes to Physics. The Physics Teacher 51:4, 226-228. [Crossref]
1082. Jong-Chan Kim, Kyeong-Jin Ban, DaeHeon Park, YangSun Lee. 2013. An object expression system using depth-maps.
Multimedia Tools and Applications 63:1, 247-263. [Crossref]
1083. Hsin-Kai Wu, Silvia Wen-Yu Lee, Hsin-Yi Chang, Jyh-Chong Liang. 2013. Current status, opportunities and challenges
of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education 62, 41-49. [Crossref]
1084. Cristian A. Linte, Katherine P. Davenport, Kevin Cleary, Craig Peters, Kirby G. Vosburgh, Nassir Navab, Philip “Eddie”
Edwards, Pierre Jannin, Terry M. Peters, David R. Holmes, Richard A. Robb. 2013. On mixed reality environments
for minimally invasive therapy guidance: Systems architecture, successes and challenges in their implementation from
laboratory to clinic. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 37:2, 83-97. [Crossref]
1085. Qingfeng Wang, Dewen Cheng, Yongtian Wang, Hong Hua, Guofan Jin. 2013. Design, tolerance, and fabrication of an
optical see-through head-mounted display with free-form surface elements. Applied Optics 52:7, C88. [Crossref]
1086. Shin HyeEun. 2013. Reading picturebook space as a cultuĝnition : Experiencing picturebook space with body. Korean
Journal of Culture and Arts Education Studies 8:1, 39-59. [Crossref]
1087. Jieun Lee, Soulkey Kim, Jongjun Kim. 2013. A Study on the Dynamic Expression of Fabrics based on RGB-D Sensor
and 3D Virtual Clothing CAD System. Fashion business 17:1, 30-41. [Crossref]
1088. Yeon-Jae Oh, Eung-Kon Kim. 2013. Implementation and Analysis of 3D Fish Encyclopedia for Children Education in
Mobile Environment. The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences 8:2, 355-361. [Crossref]
1089. Benjamin J. Dixon, Michael J. Daly, Harley Chan, Allan D. Vescan, Ian J. Witterick, Jonathan C. Irish. 2013. Surgeons
blinded by enhanced navigation: the effect of augmented reality on attention. Surgical Endoscopy 27:2, 454-461. [Crossref]
1090. Zoltán Szabó, Sören Berg, Stefan Sjökvist, Torbjörn Gustafsson, Per Carleberg, Magnus Uppsäll, Joakim Wren, Henrik
Ahn, Örjan Smedby. 2013. Real-time intraoperative visualization of myocardial circulation using augmented reality
temperature display. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 29:2, 521-528. [Crossref]
1091. Kuen Meau Chen, Ming Jen Wang. 2013. Using the Interactive Design of Gesture Recognition in Augmented Reality.
Applied Mechanics and Materials 311, 185-190. [Crossref]
1092. Omer Rashid Ahmad, Ayoub Al-Hamadi. A New Approach for Hand Augmentation Based on Patch Modelling 162-171.
[Crossref]
1093. Xin Chen, Lejing Wang, Pascal Fallavollita, Nassir Navab. 2013. Precise X-ray and video overlay for augmented reality
fluoroscopy. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 8:1, 29-38. [Crossref]
1094. Arnis Cirulis, Kristaps Brigis Brigmanis. 2013. 3D Outdoor Augmented Reality for Architecture and Urban Planning.
Procedia Computer Science 25, 71-79. [Crossref]
1095. Egils Ginters, Arnis Cirulis, Gatis Blums. 2013. Markerless Outdoor AR-RFID Solution for Logistics. Procedia Computer
Science 25, 80-89. [Crossref]
1096. Azfar Bin Tomi, Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli. 2013. An Interactive Mobile Augmented Reality Magical Playbook:
Learning Number with the Thirsty Crow. Procedia Computer Science 25, 123-130. [Crossref]
1097. Luis Eduardo Garza, Gabriel Pantoja, Pablo Ramírez, Hector Ramírez, Nestor Rodríguez, Eduardo González, Raúl Quintal,
Juan A. Pérez. 2013. Augmented Reality Application for the Maintenance of a Flapper Valve of a Fuller-kynion Type M
Pump. Procedia Computer Science 25, 154-160. [Crossref]
1098. Horacio Rios, Eduardo González, Ciro Rodriguez, Hector R. Siller, Manuel Contero. 2013. A Mobile Solution to Enhance
Training and Execution of Troubleshooting Techniques of the Engine Air Bleed System on Boeing 737. Procedia Computer
Science 25, 161-170. [Crossref]
1099. Héctor Olmedo. 2013. Virtuality Continuum's State of the Art. Procedia Computer Science 25, 261-270. [Crossref]
1100. Damian Grajewski, Filip Górski, Przemysław Zawadzki, Adam Hamrol. 2013. Application of Virtual Reality Techniques
in Design of Ergonomic Manufacturing Workplaces. Procedia Computer Science 25, 289-301. [Crossref]
1101. Utku Kose, Durmus Koc, Suleyman Anil Yucesoy. 2013. An Augmented Reality based Mobile Software to Support
Learning Experiences in Computer Science Courses. Procedia Computer Science 25, 370-374. [Crossref]
1102. Antonia Cascales, David Pérez-López, Manuel Contero. 2013. Study on Parent's Acceptance of the Augmented Reality
Use for Preschool Education. Procedia Computer Science 25, 420-427. [Crossref]
1103. Michelle L. Rusch, Mark C. Schall, Patrick Gavin, John D. Lee, Jeffrey D. Dawson, Shaun Vecera, Matthew Rizzo. 2013.
Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
16, 127-137. [Crossref]
1104. Kyungwon Yun, Jungman Chung, Yong Park, Byungjoo Lee, Won Gu Lee, Hyunwoo Bang. 2013. Microscopic
augmented-reality indicators for long-term live cell time-lapsed imaging. The Analyst 138:11, 3196. [Crossref]
1105. Luca De Marchi, Alessandro Ceruti, Alessandro Marzani, Alfredo Liverani. 2013. Augmented Reality to Support On-
Field Post-Impact Maintenance Operations on Thin Structures. Journal of Sensors 2013, 1-10. [Crossref]
1106. F. López-Mir, V. Naranjo, J. J. Fuertes, M. Alcañiz, J. Bueno, E. Pareja. 2013. Design and Validation of an Augmented
Reality System for Laparoscopic Surgery in a Real Environment. BioMed Research International 2013, 1-12. [Crossref]
1107. Sheng-Hsiung Chang, Tsair-Chun Liang. 2013. An Innovative Direct-Interaction-Enabled Augmented-Reality 3D
System. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2013, 1-4. [Crossref]
1108. Alim P. Mitha, Mohammed A. Almekhlafi, Major Jameel J. Janjua, Felipe C. Albuquerque, Cameron G. McDougall.
2013. Simulation and Augmented Reality in Endovascular Neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 72, A107-A114. [Crossref]
1109. LeenSeok Kang. 2013. Field Applicability of Augmented Reality Technology by Marker Mapping for Construction Project
(Focused on Measurement Process of Rebar Work). Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers 33:6, 2509. [Crossref]
1110. Ha-na Yoo, EunJung Chung, Byoung-Hee Lee. 2013. The Effects of Augmented Reality-based Otago Exercise on Balance,
Gait, and Falls Efficacy of Elderly Women. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 25:7, 797-801. [Crossref]
1111. Tsuyoshi Okayama, Kazuya Miyawaki. 2013. The “Smart Garden” System using Augmented Reality. IFAC Proceedings
Volumes 46:4, 307-310. [Crossref]
1112. N. Zenati, S. Benbelkacem, M. Belhocine, A. Bellarbi. 2013. A new AR Interaction for Collaborative E-maintenance
System. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 46:9, 619-624. [Crossref]
1113. A. Mejías Borrero, M.A. Märquez Sänchez, J. M. Andújar Märquez, M. R. Sänchez Herrera. 2013. A Complete Solution
for Developing Remote Labs. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 46:17, 96-101. [Crossref]
1114. Erkan Bostanci, Nadia Kanwal, Shoaib Ehsan, Adrian F. Clark. 2013. User Tracking Methods for Augmented Reality.
International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering 93-98. [Crossref]
1115. Kah Pin Ng, Guat Yew Tan, Ya Ping Wong. 2013. Vision-Based Hand Detection for Registration of Virtual Objects in
Augmented Reality. International Journal of Future Computer and Communication 423-427. [Crossref]
1116. Mariusz Nowostawski, Julian Münster. A Virtual Spatiotemporal Annotation System: The Virtual Stickies Mobile
Augmented Reality Study 159-182. [Crossref]
1117. Woong Ki Park, Hyun Uk Kim, Chang Gil Lee, Seung Hee Park. 2013. Augmented Reality-Based Embedded Sensor
Location Recognition and Data Visualization Technique for Concrete Structural Health Monitoring. Applied Mechanics
and Materials 281, 593-596. [Crossref]
1118. Chan-Li Lin, Shih-Han Fei, Shu-Wei Chang. An Analysis of Social Interaction between Older and Children: Augmented
Reality Integration in Table Game Design 835-838. [Crossref]
1119. Francesco Capozzi, Marco Sacco. Exploiting Augmented Reality in Lean Manufacturing: Opportunities and Challenges
1361-1373. [Crossref]
1120. Shys-Fan Yang-Mao, Ming-Hui Lin, Yu-Ting Lin, Wen-Jun Zeng, Yueh-Yi Lai. Exploring Psychophysical Factors
Influencing Visibility of Virtual Image Display 327-335. [Crossref]
1121. . 3D Graphics and Rendering 17-62. [Crossref]
1122. . 3D Applications 289-311. [Crossref]
1123. Susan A. Yoon, Karen Elinich, Joyce Wang, Christopher Steinmeier, Sean Tucker. 2012. Using augmented reality and
knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported
Collaborative Learning 7:4, 519-541. [Crossref]
1124. Jia-Ruey Chang, Hui-Mi Hsu, Sao-Jeng Chao. 2012. Development of a Road Monitoring and Reporting System Based
on Location-Based Services and Augmented-Reality Technologies. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 26:6,
812-823. [Crossref]
1125. Zhen Bai, Alan F. Blackwell. 2012. Analytic review of usability evaluation in ISMAR. Interacting with Computers 24:6,
450-460. [Crossref]
1126. A. Mejías Borrero, J. M. Andújar Márquez. 2012. A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality to Enhance
the Use of Remote Labs in Electrical Engineering Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 21:5, 540-557.
[Crossref]
1127. Patrick Leslie, Joshua M. Pearce, Rob Harrap, Sylvie Daniel. 2012. The application of smartphone technology to economic
and environmental analysis of building energy conservation strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 31:5,
295-311. [Crossref]
1128. Rosario del-Rey-Alamillo, José-A. Casas, Rosario Ortega-Ruiz. 2012. The ConRed Program, an Evidence-based Practice.
Comunicar 20:39, 129-138. [Crossref]
1129. Jim Hahn. 2012. Mobile augmented reality applications for library services. New Library World 113:9/10, 429-438.
[Crossref]
1130. . Colorimetric and Color Appearance-Based Characterization of Displays 25-95. [Crossref]
1131. Chih-Ming Chen, Yen-Nung Tsai. 2012. Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction
in elementary schools. Computers & Education 59:2, 638-652. [Crossref]
1132. Florian Leutert, Klaus Schilling. Support of power plant telemaintenance with robots by Augmented Reality methods
45-49. [Crossref]
1133. Min-Woo Park, Jung-Pil Park, Soon-Ki Jung. 2012. An Implementation of QR Code based On-line Mobile Augmented
Reality System. Journal of Korea Multimedia Society 15:8, 1004-1016. [Crossref]
1134. Tobias Langlotz, Stefan Mooslechner, Stefanie Zollmann, Claus Degendorfer, Gerhard Reitmayr, Dieter Schmalstieg.
2012. Sketching up the world: in situ authoring for mobile Augmented Reality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16:6,
623-630. [Crossref]
1135. Jin-ling ZHANG. 2012. Construction of parallel and distributed static simulation system based on augmented reality. The
Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications 19:4, 117-121. [Crossref]
1136. Astrid M. von der Pütten, Jennifer Klatt, Simon Ten Broeke, Roderick McCall, Nicole C. Krämer, Richard Wetzel, Lisa
Blum, Leif Oppermann, Johannes Klatt. 2012. Subjective and behavioral presence measurement and interactivity in the
collaborative augmented reality game TimeWarp. Interacting with Computers 24:4, 317-325. [Crossref]
1137. Michael Gervautz, Dieter Schmalstieg. 2012. Anywhere Interfaces Using Handheld Augmented Reality. Computer 45:7,
26-31. [Crossref]
1138. Andre R. Denham, John M. Quick, Robert K. Atkinson. 2012. mLearning. International Journal of Cyber Behavior,
Psychology and Learning 2:3, 1-14. [Crossref]
1139. Javier Gonzalez-Sanchez, Quincy Conley, Maria-Elena Chavez-Echeagaray, Robert K. Atkinson. 2012. Supporting the
Assembly Process by Leveraging Augmented Reality, Cloud Computing, and Mobile Devices. International Journal of
Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning 2:3, 86-102. [Crossref]
1140. . Bibliography 197-238. [Crossref]
1141. Z. Shen, L. Jiang. An Augmented 3D iPad Mobile Application for Communication, Collaboration, and Learning (CCL)
of Building MEP Systems 204-212. [Crossref]
1142. Petri Selonen, Petros Belimpasakis, Yu You, Timo Pylvänäinen, Severi Uusitalo. 2012. Mixed reality web service platform.
Multimedia Systems 18:3, 215-230. [Crossref]
1143. Simen Hagen, Frode Eika Sandnes. 2012. Visual scoping and personal space on shared tabletop surfaces. Journal of Ambient
Intelligence and Humanized Computing 3:2, 95-102. [Crossref]
1144. 2012. Editorial. International Journal of Architectural Computing 10:2, iii-v. [Crossref]
1145. Hyeong-Seok Ko, In-Kwon Lee, Woontack Woo, YoonKyungHyun, Jehee Lee, 이이이. 2012. 이이이 이이이이 이이 이이: 2이 이이이이 이
이 이이. Journal of the Korea Computer Graphics Society 18:2, 35-53. [Crossref]
1146. Beshoy Morkos, Joachim Taiber, Joshua Summers, Laine Mears, Georges Fadel, Torsten Rilka. 2012. Mobile devices
within manufacturing environments: a BMW applicability study. International Journal on Interactive Design and
Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 6:2, 101-111. [Crossref]
1147. Pablo A Prieto, Francisco D Soto, Marcos D Zúñiga, Sheng-Feng Qin, David K Wright. 2012. Three-dimensional
immersive mixed-reality interface for structural design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal
of Engineering Manufacture 226:5, 955-958. [Crossref]
1148. Dongdong Weng, Dewen Cheng, Yongtian Wang, Yue Liu. 2012. Display systems and registration methods for augmented
reality applications. Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 123:9, 769-774. [Crossref]
1149. Kyung-Jin Heo, Seok-Jun Lee, Soon-Ki Jung. 2012. A Study of Augmented Reality based Visualization using Shape
Information of Building Information Modeling. Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society 20:2, 1-11. [Crossref]
1150. Kwang-Woon Choi, Da-Un Jung, Suk-Han Lee, Jong-Soo Choi. 2012. Interaction Augmented Reality System using a
Hand Motion. Journal of Korea Multimedia Society 15:4, 425-438. [Crossref]
1151. Ghada Moussa, Essam Radwan, Khaled Hussain. 2012. Augmented Reality Vehicle system: Left-turn maneuver study.
Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 21:1, 1-16. [Crossref]
1152. 이이이. 2012. Exploring the Possibility of Utilization on Augmented Reality Technology in Geography Learning. The Journal
of The Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education 20:1, 79-94. [Crossref]
1153. Zsombor Paróczi, István Nagy, Csaba Gáspár-Papanek, Zsolt T. Kardkovács, Endre Varga, Ádám Siegler, Péter Lucz.
2012. Augmented Reality Aspects of Object Recognition in Driver Support Systems. Journal of Advanced Computational
Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics 16:2, 284-296. [Crossref]
1154. Daping Wang, Michael Brenner. 2012. Augmented reality: service construction via a 4D communication model. IEEE
Communications Magazine 50:3, 26-31. [Crossref]
1155. Florin Gîrbacia, Gheorghe Leonte Mogan, Tudor Paunescu. 2012. AR-Based Off-Line Programming of the RV-M1
Robot. Applied Mechanics and Materials 162, 344-351. [Crossref]
1156. M. Kersten-Oertel, P. Jannin, D. L. Collins. 2012. DVV: A Taxonomy for Mixed Reality Visualization in Image Guided
Surgery. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18:2, 332-352. [Crossref]
1157. Hussain Al-Issa, Holger Regenbrecht, Leigh Hale. 2012. Augmented reality applications in rehabilitation to improve
physical outcomes. Physical Therapy Reviews 17:1, 16-28. [Crossref]
1158. Byung-Ho Kim. 2012. A Context-aware Mobile Augmented Reality Platform. The Journal of the Korean Institute of
Information and Communication Engineering 16:1, 205-211. [Crossref]
1159. Kang-Hoon Lee, Sae-Hong Cho. 2012. Implementation of Traditional Architectural Heritage Using Augmented Reality.
Journal of Korea Multimedia Society 15:1, 131-139. [Crossref]
1160. Alexander Erifiu, Gerald Ostermayer. Hardware Sensor Aspects in Mobile Augmented Reality 536-543. [Crossref]
1161. Serena Zanolla, Antonio Rodà, Filippo Romano, Francesco Scattolin, Gian Luca Foresti, Sergio Canazza, Corrado Canepa,
Paolo Coletta, Gualtiero Volpe. Teaching by Means of a Technologically Augmented Environment: The Stanza Logo-
Motoria 231-235. [Crossref]
1162. Rifat Ozcan, Fatih Orhan, M. Fatih Demirci, Osman Abul. An Adaptive Smoothing Method for Sensor Noise in
Augmented Reality Applications on Smartphones 209-218. [Crossref]
1163. A.Y.C. Nee, S.K. Ong, G. Chryssolouris, D. Mourtzis. 2012. Augmented reality applications in design and manufacturing.
CIRP Annals 61:2, 657-679. [Crossref]
1164. J. Zhang, S.K. Ong, A.Y.C. Nee. 2012. Design and Development of an in situ Machining Simulation System Using
Augmented Reality Technology. Procedia CIRP 3, 185-190. [Crossref]
1165. Pedro C. Santana-Mancilla, Miguel A. Garc’a-Ruiz, Ricardo Acosta-Diaz, Celso U. Juárez. 2012. Service Oriented
Architecture to Support Mexican Secondary Education through Mobile Augmented Reality. Procedia Computer Science
10, 721-727. [Crossref]
1166. Peng Minjing. 2012. A Model of Integrating Virtual and Real Objects Based on Contour Algorithm and Gabor Filter.
Procedia Engineering 29, 3949-3953. [Crossref]
1167. Kamarulzaman Ab Aziz, Nor Azlina Ab Aziz, Anuar Mohd Yusof, Avijit Paul. 2012. Potential for Providing Augmented
Reality Elements in Special Education via Cloud Computing. Procedia Engineering 41, 333-339. [Crossref]
1168. Te-Lien Chou, Lih-Juan ChanLin. 2012. Augmented Reality Smartphone Environment Orientation Application: A Case
Study of the Fu-Jen University Mobile Campus Touring System. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 410-416.
[Crossref]
1169. Hannu Salmi, Arja Kaasinen, Veera Kallunki. 2012. Towards an Open Learning Environment via Augmented Reality
(AR): Visualising the Invisible in Science Centres and Schools for Teacher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences 45, 284-295. [Crossref]
1170. Mehmet Kesim, Yasin Ozarslan. 2012. Augmented Reality in Education: Current Technologies and the Potential for
Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 47, 297-302. [Crossref]
1171. Jorge Martin-Gutierrez, Egils Guinters, David Perez-Lopez. 2012. Improving Strategy of Self-Learning in Engineering:
Laboratories with Augmented Reality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 51, 832-839. [Crossref]
1172. Livia Ştefan. 2012. Immersive Collaborative Environments for Teaching and Learning Traditional Design. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences 51, 1056-1060. [Crossref]
1173. . 467-553. [Crossref]
1174. Stefano Filippi, Daniela Barattin. 2012. Classification and Selection of Prototyping Activities for Interaction Design.
Intelligent Information Management 04:04, 147-156. [Crossref]
1175. Dea-Gyun Kim, Yong-Hee Jang, Yong-Jin Kwon. 2012. Ambient Browser: Mobile Mixed Reality System Based on
Ambient Intelligence. International Journal of Future Computer and Communication 160-163. [Crossref]
1176. Robert Riener, Matthias Harders. VR for Planning and Intraoperative Support 211-223. [Crossref]
1177. Jong-Seung Park. 2011. AR-Room: a rapid prototyping framework for augmented reality applications. Multimedia Tools
and Applications 55:3, 725-746. [Crossref]
1178. Andrea F. Abate, Giovanni Acampora, Stefano Ricciardi. 2011. An interactive virtual guide for the AR based visit of
archaeological sites. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 22:6, 415-425. [Crossref]
1179. 이이이, Wan-Sup Cho, SeogJu chang. 2011. An Empirical Analysis on the Factors Affecting the Adoption of Smartphone.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship 6:4, 59-74. [Crossref]
1180. Rong Chi Chang. 2011. A Novel AR-Based Interactive E-Learning Platform. Advanced Materials Research 403-408,
1244-1248. [Crossref]
1181. Yi-Chen Chen, Hung-Lin Chi, Wei-Han Hung, Shih-Chung Kang. 2011. Use of Tangible and Augmented Reality
Models in Engineering Graphics Courses. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 137:4, 267-276.
[Crossref]
1182. Dangxiao Wang, Yuru Zhang, Wanlin Zhou, Hui Zhao, Zhongyuan Chen. 2011. Collocation Accuracy of Visuo-Haptic
System: Metrics and Calibration. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 4:4, 321-326. [Crossref]
1183. Susanna Nilsson, Bjorn J.E. Johansson, Arne Jonsson. 2011. Cross-Organizational Collaboration Supported by Augmented
Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17:10, 1380-1392. [Crossref]
1184. Gerhard Chroust, Karin Rainer, Nadine Sturm, Markus Roth, Peter Ziehesberger. 2011. Improving Resilience of Critical
Human Systems in CBRN Emergencies: Challenges for First Responders. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 28:5,
476-490. [Crossref]
1185. Marcin Januszka, Wojciech Moczulski. 2011. Augmented reality system for aiding engineering design process of machinery
systems. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 20:3, 294-309. [Crossref]
1186. Seung-Young Choi, Woo-Jin Chang. 2011. A Consideration of Social Presence and Augmented Reality in Locative Media.
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 11:8, 88-101. [Crossref]
1187. . Bibliography 451-518. [Crossref]
1188. Antti Ajanki, Mark Billinghurst, Hannes Gamper, Toni Järvenpää, Melih Kandemir, Samuel Kaski, Markus Koskela,
Mikko Kurimo, Jorma Laaksonen, Kai Puolamäki, Teemu Ruokolainen, Timo Tossavainen. 2011. An augmented reality
interface to contextual information. Virtual Reality 15:2-3, 161-173. [Crossref]
1189. James E. Melzer. 2011. 12.1: Invited Paper: Image Source Evaluation and Selection for Rugged Near-Eye Displays. SID
Symposium Digest of Technical Papers 42:1, 132-134. [Crossref]
1190. Sylvie Daniel, Robin Harrap. The mobile web 185-206. [Crossref]
1191. Gerhard Schall, Johannes Schöning, Volker Paelke, Georg Gartner. "A survey on augmented maps and environments
207-225. [Crossref]
1192. Nobuyoshi Yabuki, Kyoko Miyashita, Tomohiro Fukuda. 2011. An invisible height evaluation system for building height
regulation to preserve good landscapes using augmented reality. Automation in Construction 20:3, 228-235. [Crossref]
1193. Neven A.M. El Sayed, Hala H. Zayed, Mohamed I. Sharawy. 2011. ARSC: Augmented reality student card. Computers
& Education 56:4, 1045-1061. [Crossref]
1194. A. Lajn, M. Schmidt, H. von Wenckstern, M. Grundmann. 2011. Transparent Rectifying Contacts for Visible-Blind
Ultraviolet Photodiodes Based on ZnO. Journal of Electronic Materials 40:4, 473-476. [Crossref]
1195. 이이이, 이이이, 이이이. 2011. The Development of the Augmented Reality Techniques in a Mobile Environment and the Active
Utilization Plan of the Digital Design. Journal of Digital Design 11:2, 343-357. [Crossref]
1196. Bo Xie, Feng Ye, Xiao Jun Li. 2011. Research and Application of Virtual Dressing System Based on AR. Advanced Materials
Research 225-226, 1183-1187. [Crossref]
1197. Bin Luo, Yongtian Wang, Yue Liu. 2011. Sensor fusion based head pose tracking for lightweight flight cockpit systems.
Multimedia Tools and Applications 52:1, 235-255. [Crossref]
1198. Toru Takahashi, Takao Terano. Big Fat Wand: A Laser Projection System for Information Sharing in a Workspace
403-410. [Crossref]
1199. Gini Keating, Daniel Guest, Anne Konertz, Niccolo Padovani, Andrea Villa. Designing the AR Experience: Tools and
Tips for Mobile Augmented Reality UX Design 135-141. [Crossref]
1200. Monika Elepfandt, Marcelina Sünderhauf. Multimodal, Touchless Interaction in Spatial Augmented Reality Environments
263-271. [Crossref]
1201. Jonghoon Seo, Jinwook Shim, Ji Hye Choi, James Park, Tack-don Han. Enhancing Marker-Based AR Technology 97-104.
[Crossref]
1202. Jinwook Shim, Jonghoon Seo, Tack-don Han. MSL_AR Toolkit: AR Authoring Tool with Interactive Features 105-112.
[Crossref]
1203. Sei Ikeda, Yoshitsugu Manabe, Kunihiro Chihara. Augmented Reality System for Visualizing 3-D Region of Interest in
Unknown Environment 42-51. [Crossref]
1204. Chih-Hsiang Ko, Ting-Chia Chang, Yung-Hsun Chen, Li-Han Hua. The Application of Augmented Reality to Design
Education 20-24. [Crossref]
1205. Tsung-Han Lee, Kuei-Shu Hsu, Long-Jyi Yeh. Design and Application of the Augmented Reality with Digital Museum
and Digital Heritage 25-26. [Crossref]
1206. Francisco Pereira, Catarina Silva, Mário Alves. Virtual Fitting Room Augmented Reality Techniques for e-Commerce
62-71. [Crossref]
1207. Azfar Bin Tomi, Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli. A Conceptual Design for Augmented Reality Games Using Motion
Detection as User Interface and Interaction 305-315. [Crossref]
1208. Norabeerah Saforrudin, Halimah Badioze Zaman, Azlina Ahmad. Technical Skills in Developing Augmented Reality
Application: Teachers’ Readiness 360-370. [Crossref]
1209. Sin Kwan Kang, Jung Eun Kim, Hyun Lee, Dong Ha Lee, Jeong Bae Lee. A Design of Embedded Integration Prototyping
System Based on AR 54-61. [Crossref]
1210. Gyeong-Mi Park, PhyuPhyu Han, Youngbong Kim. Marker Classification Method for Hierarchical Object Navigation in
Mobile Augmented Reality 179-184. [Crossref]
1211. Weitao Che, Hui Lin, Mingyuan Hu. 2011. Reality-virtuality fusional campus environment: An online 3D platform based
on OpenSimulator. Geo-spatial Information Science 14:2, 144-149. [Crossref]
1212. Peter Hastreiter, Dirk Bartz, Bernhard Preim. Visualisierung 17-62. [Crossref]
1213. 2011. Volume Removed - Publisher's Disclaimer. Energy Procedia 13, 1-10380. [Crossref]
1214. C. Botella, J. Breton-López, S. Quero, R.M. Baños, A. García-Palacios, I. Zaragoza, M. Alcaniz. 2011. Treating cockroach
phobia using a serious game on a mobile phone and augmented reality exposure: A single case study. Computers in Human
Behavior 27:1, 217-227. [Crossref]
1215. Tony L. Talbert, Adeline Meira. Visions, Voices, and Virtual Journeys 269-289. [Crossref]
1216. Alfred Chen, Chen-Yuan Kao, Ying-Hsiu Chen, Wen-Cheng Wang. Applying Augmented Reality to Consumer Garment
Try-On Experience 169-190. [Crossref]
1217. Gunnar Liestøl. Situated Simulations Between Virtual Reality and Mobile Augmented Reality: Designing a Narrative
Space 309-319. [Crossref]
1218. Wannisa Matcha, Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli. Preliminary Investigation on the Use of Augmented Reality in
Collaborative Learning 189-198. [Crossref]
1219. Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, Chadwick A. Wingrave. The Value of Constraints for 3D User Interfaces 203-223. [Crossref]
1220. Tobias Baumgärtel, André Borrmann, Thomas Euringer, Matthias Frei, Gerd Hirzinger, Tim Horenburg, Yang Ji, Rudolf
Juli, Thomas Liebich, Frank Neuberg, Mathias Obergrießer, Markus Pfitzner, Claus Plank, Karin H. Popp, Hanno Posch,
Rupert Reif, Markus Schorr, Sabine Steinert, Bernhard Strackenbrock, Wolfgang Stockbauer, Dieter Stumpf, Alaeddin
Suleiman, Norbert Vogt, Johannes Wimmer. Integrierte Planung auf Basis von 3D-Modellen 23-115. [Crossref]
1221. Mary Lou Maher. Designers and Collaborative Virtual Environments 3-15. [Crossref]
1222. Vincent Thomas, Sylvie Daniel, Jacynthe Pouliot. 3D Modeling for Mobile Augmented Reality in Unprepared
Environment 163-177. [Crossref]
1223. Marco A. C. Simões, Josemar Rodrigues de Souza, Fagner de Assis Moura Pimentel, Diego Frias. MR-Simulator: A
Simulator for the Mixed Reality Competition of RoboCup 82-96. [Crossref]
1224. Sungmo Jung, Seoksoo Kim. A Study on Safe Reproduction of Reference Points for Recognition on Screen 7-10. [Crossref]
1225. Philip Smit, Peter Barrie, Andreas Komninos, Oleksii Mandrychenko. Mirrored Motion: Augmenting Reality and
Implementing Whole Body Gestural Control Using Pervasive Body Motion Capture Based on Wireless Sensors 35-50.
[Crossref]
1226. Jose C. Cortizo, Luis I. Diaz, Francisco M. Carrero, Adrian Yanes, Borja Monsalve. On the Future of Mobile Phones as
the Heart of Community-Built Databases 261-287. [Crossref]
1227. Eike Falk Anderson, Leigh McLoughlin, Fotis Liarokapis, Christopher Peters, Panagiotis Petridis, Sara de Freitas. 2010.
Developing serious games for cultural heritage: a state-of-the-art review. Virtual Reality 14:4, 255-275. [Crossref]
1228. J. Zhang, S.K. Ong, A.Y.C. Nee. 2010. A multi-regional computation scheme in an AR-assisted in situ CNC simulation
environment. Computer-Aided Design 42:12, 1167-1177. [Crossref]
1229. Ho Bin Yim, Poong Hyun Seong. 2010. Heuristic guidelines and experimental evaluation of effective augmented-reality
based instructions for maintenance in nuclear power plants. Nuclear Engineering and Design 240:12, 4096-4102. [Crossref]
1230. Juani Bretón-López, Soledad Quero, Cristina Botella, Azucena García-Palacios, Rosa Maria Baños, Mariano Alcañiz. 2010.
An Augmented Reality System Validation for the Treatment of Cockroach Phobia. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social
Networking 13:6, 705-710. [Crossref]
1231. Gilles Aldon. 2010. Handheld calculators between instrument and document. ZDM 42:7, 733-745. [Crossref]
1232. Sungmo Jung, Jae-gu Song, Dae-Joon Hwang, Jae Young Ahn, Seoksoo Kim. 2010. A Study on Software-based Sensing
Technology for Multiple Object Control in AR Video. Sensors 10:11, 9857-9871. [Crossref]
1233. Tansel Halic, Sinan Kockara, Coskun Bayrak, Richard Rowe. 2010. Mixed reality simulation of rasping procedure in
artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) surgery. BMC Bioinformatics 11:S6. . [Crossref]
1234. Lifeng Zhang, Xiumin Fan, Xu Jing, Shiguang Qiu, Huanchong Cheng. Visibility evaluation for vehicle interior ergonomics
based on augmented reality technology 323-328. [Crossref]
1235. Cristina Botella, Juani Bretón-López, Soledad Quero, Rosa Baños, Azucena García-Palacios. 2010. Treating Cockroach
Phobia With Augmented Reality. Behavior Therapy 41:3, 401-413. [Crossref]
1236. Rachel Ellaway. 2010. eMedical Teacher. Medical Teacher 32:9, 791-793. [Crossref]
1237. Uwe Freiherr von Lukas. 2010. Virtual and augmented reality for the maritime sector – applications and requirements.
IFAC Proceedings Volumes 43:20, 196-200. [Crossref]
1238. Hanhoon Park, Jong-Il Park. 2010. Invisible Marker–Based Augmented Reality. International Journal of Human-Computer
Interaction 26:9, 829-848. [Crossref]
1239. Dušan Omerčević, Aleš Leonardis. 2010. Hyperlinking reality via camera phones. Machine Vision and Applications 7. .
[Crossref]
1240. S.K. Ong, J.W.S. Chong, A.Y.C. Nee. 2010. A novel AR-based robot programming and path planning methodology.
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 26:3, 240-249. [Crossref]
1241. Loic Merckel, Toyoaki Nishida. 2010. Multi-interfaces approach to situated knowledge management for complex
instruments: first step toward industrial deployment. AI & SOCIETY 25:2, 211-223. [Crossref]
1242. Seungjun Kim, Anind K. Dey. 2010. AR interfacing with prototype 3D applications based on user-centered interactivity.
Computer-Aided Design 42:5, 373-386. [Crossref]
1243. Hans-Jörg Bullinger, Wilhelm Bauer, Günter Wenzel, Roland Blach. 2010. Towards user centred design (UCD) in
architecture based on immersive virtual environments. Computers in Industry 61:4, 372-379. [Crossref]
1244. Jia Jun, Qi Yue, Zuo Qing. An Extended Marker-Based Tracking System for Augmented Reality 94-97. [Crossref]
1245. Kim Cheol-Ki. 2010. Trends Research and Development View of Mobile Augmented Reality Based on Smart Phone.
Journal of Korea Design Forum null:27, 53-64. [Crossref]
1246. J. Zhang, S. K. Ong, A. Y. C. Nee. 2010. Development of an AR system achieving in situ machining simulation on a 3-
axis CNC machine. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 21:2, 103-115. [Crossref]
1247. R. Reif, W. A. Günthner, B. Schwerdtfeger, G. Klinker. 2010. Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Supported Picking
System Under Practical Conditions. Computer Graphics Forum 29:1, 2-12. [Crossref]
1248. Songkran JARUSIRISAWAD, Takahide HOSOKAWA, Hideo SAITO. 2010. Diminished reality using plane-sweep
algorithm with weakly-calibrated cameras. Progress in Informatics :7, 11. [Crossref]
1249. Rhys Gethin Thomas, Nigel William John, John Michael Delieu. 2010. Augmented Reality for Anatomical Education.
Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine 33:1, 6-15. [Crossref]
1250. Kyung-Hee Noh, Hyung-Keun Jee, Suk-Hyun Lim. 2010. Effect of Augmented Reality Contents Based Instruction on
Academic Achievement, Interest and Flow of Learning. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 10:2, 1-13. [Crossref]
1251. Jorge Martín-Gutiérrez, José Luís Saorín, Manuel Contero, Mariano Alcañiz, David C. Pérez-López, Mario Ortega. 2010.
Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics
34:1, 77-91. [Crossref]
1252. Xiaodong Tian, Xi Zhang, Kazuo Yamazaki, Adam Hansel. 2010. A study on three-dimensional vision system for
machining setup verification. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 26:1, 46-55. [Crossref]
1253. Oscar Déniz, Modesto Castrillón, Javier Lorenzo, Luis Antón, Mario Hernandez, Gloria Bueno. 2010. Computer vision
based eyewear selector. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C 11:2, 79-91. [Crossref]
1254. Mark Billinghurst, Raphaël Grasset, Hartmut Seichter. Tangible Interfaces for Ambient Augmented Reality Applications
281-302. [Crossref]
1255. Cristina Portalés, José Luis Lerma, Santiago Navarro. 2010. Augmented reality and photogrammetry: A synergy to visualize
physical and virtual city environments. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65:1, 134-142. [Crossref]
1256. Keshav Chintamani, Alex Cao, R. Darin Ellis, Abhilash K. Pandya. 2010. Improved Telemanipulator Navigation During
Display-Control Misalignments Using Augmented Reality Cues. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics -
Part A: Systems and Humans 40:1, 29-39. [Crossref]
1257. Viet Toan Phan, Seung Yeon Choo. 2010. Augmented Reality-Based Education and Fire Protection for Traditional Korean
Buildings. International Journal of Architectural Computing 8:1, 75-91. [Crossref]
1258. Salvatore Livatino, Giovanni Muscato, Filippo Bannò, Davide De Tommaso, Marco Macaluso. 2010. Video and Laser based
Augmented Reality Stereoscopic Viewing for Mobile Robot Teleoperation. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 43:23, 161-168.
[Crossref]
1259. Zude Zhou, Huaiqing Wang, Ping Lou. Intelligent Manufacturing and Manufacturing Intelligence 1-12. [Crossref]
1260. Lucio Tommaso De Paolis, Giovanni Aloisio. Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Surgery 305-320. [Crossref]
1261. Ko-Chun Lin, Sheng-Wen Huang, Sheng-Kai Chu, Ming-Wei Su, Chia-Yen Chen, Chi-Fa Chen. A Multimedia,
Augmented Reality Interactive System for the Application of a Guided School Tour 231-238. [Crossref]
1262. Christopher Schlick, Holger Luczak, Ralph Bruder. Ergonomische Gestaltung 949-1172. [Crossref]
1263. R. Tarca, L. Csokmai, T. Vesselenyi, I. Tarca, F. Popentiu Vladicescu. Augmented Reality Used to Control a Robot System
via Internet 539-544. [Crossref]
1264. Viviana Chimienti, Salvatore Iliano, Michele Dassisti, Gino Dini, Franco Failli. Guidelines for Implementing Augmented
Reality Procedures in Assisting Assembly Operations 174-179. [Crossref]
1265. Jorge Martín-Gutiérrez, Manuel Contero, Mariano Alcañiz. Evaluating the Usability of an Augmented Reality Based
Educational Application 296-306. [Crossref]
1266. Damon Shing-Min Liu, Chun-Hao Yung, Cheng-Hsuan Chung. A Cross-Platform Framework for Physics-Based
Collaborative Augmented Reality 80-90. [Crossref]
1267. Petri Selonen, Petros Belimpasakis, Yu You. Experiences in Building a RESTful Mixed Reality Web Service Platform
400-414. [Crossref]
1268. Marcus Tönnis. Eingabe und Interaktion 95-126. [Crossref]
1269. Marcus Tönnis. Tracking 43-94. [Crossref]
1270. Marcus Tönnis. Ausblicke 161-171. [Crossref]
1271. Marcus Tönnis. Darstellung virtueller Objekte 7-41. [Crossref]
1272. Marcus Tönnis. Anwendungen und Erfahrungen 127-160. [Crossref]
1273. Marcus Tönnis. Einführung in die Augmented Reality 1-6. [Crossref]
1274. Adrian David Cheok. Introduction 1-18. [Crossref]
1275. Giovanni Cagalaban, Seoksoo Kim. Projective Illumination Technique in Unprepared Environments for Augmented
Reality Applications 17-23. [Crossref]
1276. Ji-hoon Lim, Seoksoo Kim. A Study on Markerless AR-Based Infant Education System Using CBIR 52-58. [Crossref]
1277. Nobuyoshi Yabuki, Petcharat Limsupreeyarat, Tanit Tongthong. Collaborative and Visualized Safety Planning for
Construction Performed at High Elevation 282-285. [Crossref]
1278. Paul de Lange, Yuhei Takata, Hongho Kim, Hongen Liao, Etsuko Kobayashi, Minoru Ono, Shunei Kyo, Shinichi
Takamoto, Satoshi Ishii, Takeo Asano, Ichiro Sakuma. Real-Time Epicardial Excitation Time Map Overlay 521-530.
[Crossref]
1279. Marcin Januszka, Wojciech Moczulski. Augmented Reality for Machinery Systems Design and Development 91-99.
[Crossref]
1280. Mathieu Boussard, Pierrick Thébault. Navigating the Web of Things: Visualizing and Interacting with Web-Enabled
Objects 390-398. [Crossref]
1281. Giovanni Cagalaban, Seoksoo Kim. Multiple Object Tracking in Unprepared Environments Using Combined Feature for
Augmented Reality Applications 1-9. [Crossref]
1282. Erik Champion. Augmenting the Present With the Past 157-176. [Crossref]
1283. Seoksoo Kim. Eye Tracking Technique for Product Information Provision 1-7. [Crossref]
1284. Sungmo Jung, Jae-gu Song, Seoksoo Kim. A Study on Marker Overlapping Control for M2M-Based Augmented Reality
Multiple Object Loading Using Bresenham Algorithm 8-15. [Crossref]
1285. J. Benjamin Gotow, Krzysztof Zienkiewicz, Jules White, Douglas C. Schmidt. Addressing Challenges with Augmented
Reality Applications on Smartphones 129-143. [Crossref]
1286. Vladimir Stantchev. Enhancing Health-Care Services with Mixed Reality Systems 337-356. [Crossref]
1287. Susanna Nilsson, Björn Johansson, Arne Jönsson. A Holistic Approach to Design and Evaluation of Mixed Reality Systems
33-55. [Crossref]
1288. Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller, Martin R. Gibbs, Frank Vetere. An Exploration of Exertion in Mixed Reality Systems via the
“Table Tennis for Three” Game 165-182. [Crossref]
1289. J. Talbot, J. Meyer, R. Watts, R. Grasset. 2009. A method for patient set-up guidance in radiotherapy using augmented
reality. Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine 32:4, 203-211. [Crossref]
1290. Do Hyoung Shin, Won-Suk Jang. 2009. Utilization of ubiquitous computing for construction AR technology. Automation
in Construction 18:8, 1063-1069. [Crossref]
1291. Hiroshi Sato, Takeru Inoue, Hideaki Iwamoto, Noriyuki Takahashi. Virtual Scent: Finding Locations of Interest in
Ambient Intelligence Environments 384-389. [Crossref]
1292. Richard T. Stone, Ann M. Bisantz, James Llinas, Victor Paquet. 2009. Augmented Multisensory Interface Design (AMID):
A Human-Centric Approach to Unisensory and Multisensory Augmented Reality Design. Journal of Cognitive Engineering
and Decision Making 3:4, 362-388. [Crossref]
1293. Mani Golparvar-Fard, Feniosky Peña-Mora, Carlos A. Arboleda, SangHyun Lee. 2009. Visualization of Construction
Progress Monitoring with 4D Simulation Model Overlaid on Time-Lapsed Photographs. Journal of Computing in Civil
Engineering 23:6, 391-404. [Crossref]
1294. Eugene Ch’ng. 2009. Experiential archaeology: Is virtual time travel possible?. Journal of Cultural Heritage 10:4, 458-470.
[Crossref]
1295. Yuka Inoue. 2009. Application of an imaging system to a museum exhibition for developing interactive exhibitions. Journal
of Electronic Imaging 18:4, 043008. [Crossref]
1296. C. H. Lio, C. M. Carswell, Q. Han, A. Park, S. Strup, W. B. Seales, D. Clarke, G. Lee, J. Hoskins. 2009. Using Formal
Qualitative Methods to Guide Early Development of an Augmented Reality Display System for Surgey. Proceedings of the
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 53:18, 1181-1185. [Crossref]
1297. Ralf A. Kockro, Yeo Tseng Tsai, Ivan Ng, Peter Hwang, Chuangui Zhu, Kusuma Agusanto, Liang Xiao Hong, Luis Serra.
2009. DEX-RAY. Neurosurgery 65:4, 795-808. [Crossref]
1298. Yuko Uematsu, Hideo Saito. 2009. Multiple planes based registration using 3D Projective Space for Augmented Reality.
Image and Vision Computing 27:10, 1484-1496. [Crossref]
1299. Jan Klein, Ola Friman, Markus Hadwiger, Bernhard Preim, Felix Ritter, Anna Vilanova, Gabriel Zachmann, Dirk Bartz.
2009. Visual computing for medical diagnosis and treatment. Computers & Graphics 33:4, 554-565. [Crossref]
1300. Sae-woon Ryu, Sang Lee, Sang Ahn, Jong-il Park. 2009. Tangible video teleconference system using real-time image-
based relighting. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 55:3, 1162-1168. [Crossref]
1301. J.W.S. Chong, S.K. Ong, A.Y.C. Nee, K. Youcef-Youmi. 2009. Robot programming using augmented reality: An interactive
method for planning collision-free paths. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 25:3, 689-701. [Crossref]
1302. Zhu Jinhui, Zheng Qilun, Liang Yingju, Liang Mingjie, Min Huaqing. A component-based hybrid testbed for multi-
mobile robots 905-909. [Crossref]
1303. Tor Gjosaeter. Computer Supported Collaborative Design Using Augmented Reality 35-40. [Crossref]
1304. Xiangyu Wang. 2009. Augmented Reality in Architecture and Design: Potentials and Challenges for Application.
International Journal of Architectural Computing 7:2, 309-326. [Crossref]
1305. Daniel Jernigan, Stephen Fernandez, Russell Pensyl, Lee Shangping. 2009. Digitally augmented reality characters in live
theatre performances. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 5:1, 35-49. [Crossref]
1306. Rupert Reif, Willibald A. Günthner. 2009. Pick-by-vision: augmented reality supported order picking. The Visual Computer
25:5-7, 461-467. [Crossref]
1307. Pier Paolo Valentini. 2009. Interactive virtual assembling in augmented reality. International Journal on Interactive Design
and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 3:2, 109-119. [Crossref]
1308. Mark Fiala. A Robot Control and Augmented Reality Interface for Multiple Robots 31-36. [Crossref]
1309. Koji Makanae, Nashwan Dawood. 2009. Development and Evaluation of a Tangible Terrain Representation System for
Highway Route Planning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 24:3, 225-235. [Crossref]
1310. Guan Tao, Li Lijun, Liu Wei, Wang Cheng. 2009. Registration using adaptive particle filter and natural features matching
techniques for augmented reality systems. Assembly Automation 29:1, 75-84. [Crossref]
1311. Hyungjun Park, Hee-Cheol Moon, Jae Yeol Lee. 2009. Tangible augmented prototyping of digital handheld products.
Computers in Industry 60:2, 114-125. [Crossref]
1312. Seok Kyoo Kim, Sung Hyun Moon, Jun Park, Sang Yong Han. Efficient Annotation Visualization Using Distinctive
Features 295-303. [Crossref]
1313. Zhenbiao Wang, Yan Shen, Soh Khim Ong, Andrew Yeh-Ching Nee. Assembly Design and Evaluation Based on Bare-
Hand Interaction in an Augmented Reality Environment 21-28. [Crossref]
1314. Yuan Yao, Xiu-xiang Pang, Tao Liu, Qing-xi Hu. Design of a Prototype for Augmented Reality Defective Bone Repair
Simulation System 66-70. [Crossref]
1315. M. Harders, G. Bianchi, B. Knoerlein, G. Szekely. 2009. Calibration, Registration, and Synchronization for High Precision
Augmented Reality Haptics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15:1, 138-149. [Crossref]
1316. Teruaki Ito, Takashi Niwa. Invited Paper: A Marker-Based Viewpoint Recognition for Interaction with Virtual Objects
437-442. [Crossref]
1317. Naoji SHIROMA, Ikuma FURIHATA, Eimei OYAMA. 2009. Compact Image Stabilization System for Sensation Sharing
and Small-Sized-Humanoid Operation(Mechanical Systems). Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Series C 75:759, 3019-3028. [Crossref]
1318. Vladimir Stantchev, Ralf Meyer. Environmental Engineering and Facility Management of Berlin’s Public Buildings 91-104.
[Crossref]
1319. Damien Perritaz, Christophe Salzmann, Denis Gillet, Olivier Naef, Jacques Bapst, Frédéric Barras, Elena Mugellini, Omar
Abou Khaled. 6 th  Sense– Toward a Generic Framework for End-to-End Adaptive Wearable Augmented Reality 280-310.
[Crossref]
1320. Ryong Lee, Kazutoshi Sumiya. Zero-Effort Search and Integration Model for Augmented Web Applications 330-339.
[Crossref]
1321. Vladimir Stantchev. Intelligent Systems for Optimized Operating Rooms 443-453. [Crossref]
1322. Volker Paelke, Karsten Nebe. Dynamic Maps for Future Navigation Systems: Agile Design Exploration of User Interface
Concepts 169-178. [Crossref]
1323. Mark Billinghurst, Raphaël Grasset, Hartmut Seichter, Andreas Dünser. Towards Ambient Augmented Reality with
Tangible Interfaces 387-396. [Crossref]
1324. Maribeth Gandy, Brian Jones, Scott Robertson, Tiffany O‘Quinn, Amos Johnson. Rapidly Prototyping Marker Based
Tangible User Interfaces 159-168. [Crossref]
1325. Rafael Radkowski. Software-Agents for On-Demand Authoring of Mobile Augmented Reality Applications 225-234.
[Crossref]
1326. Mark Billinghurst, Hirokazu Kato, Seiko Myojin. Advanced Interaction Techniques for Augmented Reality Applications
13-22. [Crossref]
1327. Luis Basañez, Raúl Suárez. Teleoperation 449-468. [Crossref]
1328. Giandomenico Caruso, Umberto Cugini. Augmented Reality Video See-through HMD Oriented to Product Design
Assessment 532-541. [Crossref]
1329. Shiqi Li, Tao Peng, Chi Xu, Yan Fu, Yang Liu. A Mixed Reality-Based Assembly Verification and Training Platform
576-585. [Crossref]
1330. Zakiah Noh, Mohd Shahrizal Sunar, Zhigeng Pan. A Review on Augmented Reality for Virtual Heritage System 50-61.
[Crossref]
1331. Ajune Wanis Ismail, Mohd Shahrizal Sunar. Survey on Collaborative AR for Multi-user in Urban Studies and Planning
444-455. [Crossref]
1332. Donggang Yu, Jesse Sheng Jin, Suhuai Luo, Wei Lai, Qingming Huang. A Useful Visualization Technique: A Literature
Review for Augmented Reality and its Application, limitation & future direction 311-337. [Crossref]
1333. Loic Merckel, Toyoaki Nishida. Low-Overhead 3D Items Drawing Engine for Communicating Situated Knowledge 31-41.
[Crossref]
1334. Ajune Wanis Ismail, Mohd. Shahrizal Sunar. Collaborative Augmented Reality: Multi-user Interaction in Urban
Simulation 382-391. [Crossref]
1335. Aw Kien Sin, Halimah Badioze Zaman. Tangible Interaction in Learning Astronomy through Augmented Reality Book-
Based Educational Tool 302-313. [Crossref]
1336. Behrang Parhizkar, Halimah Badioze Zaman. Development of an Augmented Reality Rare Book and Manuscript for Special
Library Collection (AR Rare-BM) 344-355. [Crossref]
1337. M. Andersen, R. Andersen, C. Larsen, T. B. Moeslund, O. Madsen. Interactive Assembly Guide Using Augmented Reality
999-1008. [Crossref]
1338. Konrad Kölzer, Frank Nagl, Bastian Birnbach, Paul Grimm. Rendering Virtual Objects with High Dynamic Range
Lighting Extracted Automatically from Unordered Photo Collections 992-1001. [Crossref]
1339. Jun Hu, Loe Feijs. A Distributed Multi-agent Architecture in Simulation Based Medical Training 105-115. [Crossref]
1340. Ingo Wietzel, Hans Hagen, Gerhard Steinebach. Augmented Reality and Immersive Scenarios in Urban Planning 81-90.
[Crossref]
1341. Dahai Liu, Nikolas Macchiarella, Dennis Vincenzi. Augmented Reality as a Means of Job Task Training in Aviation
333-348. [Crossref]
1342. Yongjun Qiao, Xiaofang Xie, Tao Sun. A Mobile Intelligent Training System for Cockpit 685-688. [Crossref]
1343. Tobias Sielhorst, Marco Feuerstein, Nassir Navab. 2008. Advanced Medical Displays: A Literature Review of Augmented
Reality. Journal of Display Technology 4:4, 451-467. [Crossref]
1344. Scott A. Green, J. Geoffrey Chase, XiaoQi Chen, Mark Billinghurst. Evaluating the Augmented Reality Human-Robot
Collaboration System 521-526. [Crossref]
1345. Yongjun Qiao, Xiaofang Xie, Tao Sun, Yongsheng Li. A Design of Human-Computer Interaction Based on Head Tracker
718-721. [Crossref]
1346. Yong-jun Qiao, Xiao-fang Xie, Tao Sun. Design for the Cockpit Intelligent Tutoring System Based on Augmented Reality
224-227. [Crossref]
1347. K Zreik. HyperUrban 263-268. [Crossref]
1348. Teng Fei, Liang Xiao-Hui, He Zhi-Ying, Hua Guo-Liang. A Registration Method Based on Nature Feature with KLT
Tracking Algorithm for Wearable Computers 416-421. [Crossref]
1349. Feng Zhou, Henry Been-Lirn Duh, Mark Billinghurst. Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A
review of ten years of ISMAR 193-202. [Crossref]
1350. . Bibliography 549-602. [Crossref]
1351. Zhang Ruling, Sun Hanxu, Jia Qingxuan, Yao Fusheng. Research on fast and accurate occlusion detection technology of
augmented reality system 111-116. [Crossref]
1352. Alejandro Catalá, Javier Jaén, José A. Mocholí. A Semantic Publish/Subscribe Approach for U-VR Systems Interoperation
29-32. [Crossref]
1353. Ki-Hong Kim, Hyuk Jeong, Hong Kee Kim, Jong-Sung Kim, Wookho Son. A UMPC Based Mixed Reality System
Replacing a Tour Guide 59-62. [Crossref]
1354. Tolga Capin, Kari Pulli, Tomas Akenine-Möller. 2008. The State of the Art in Mobile Graphics Research. IEEE Computer
Graphics and Applications 28:4, 74-84. [Crossref]
1355. Tilo Hartmann. Presence . [Crossref]
1356. Payam Ghadirian, Ian D. Bishop. 2008. Integration of augmented reality and GIS: A new approach to realistic landscape
visualisation. Landscape and Urban Planning 86:3-4, 226-232. [Crossref]
1357. Georgios Christou, Frank E. Ritter, Robert J. K. Jacob. Modeling prehensile actions for the evaluation of Tangible User
Interfaces 415-420. [Crossref]
1358. Mi Jeong Kim, Mary Lou Maher. 2008. The impact of tangible user interfaces on spatial cognition during collaborative
design. Design Studies 29:3, 222-253. [Crossref]
1359. Jesus Gimeno, Aron Pujana-Arrese, Marcos Fernandez, Joseba Landaluze. BIOMIMO Design &이38; Test: Motion capture
and AR techniques to design and test an orthosis prototype 182-187. [Crossref]
1360. Andrea F. Abate, Vincenzo Loia, Michele Nappi, Stefano Ricciardi, Enrico Boccola. ASSYST: Avatar baSed SYStem
mainTenance 1-6. [Crossref]
1361. Yuan Tian, Zhongyi Li, Wei Liu, Lijun Li, Tao Guan. Non-rigid registration using AAM and factorization method for
augmented reality applications 705-709. [Crossref]
1362. G. Reinhart, U. Munzert, W. Vogl. 2008. A programming system for robot-based remote-laser-welding with conventional
optics. CIRP Annals 57:1, 37-40. [Crossref]
1363. Nguyen Thi Ngoc Vinh, Nguyen Quang Tung, Heesung Jun. Applying Service-Oriented Architecture in AR-Based
Annotation Message System 524-527. [Crossref]
1364. Yan Feng. Estimation of Light Source Environment for Illumination Consistency of Augmented Reality 771-775.
[Crossref]
1365. Hsi-Chun Wang, Wen-Hsin Liu, Chia-Long Chang, Yi-Hui Chen. Design of Halftone-Based AR Markers under Infrared
Detection 97-100. [Crossref]
1366. Chen Dawei, Ma Zhiling, Yang Xiping. A Virtual Object Generation Method Based on Image Vector Recognition
1141-1145. [Crossref]
1367. Su Hui Lin. Taiwan Imaginary: Puppet Show in Hand, The Creative Apparatus Using Multimedia Augmented Reality
349-352. [Crossref]
1368. Tianren Wang, Yue Liu, Yongtian Wang. Infrared Marker Based Augmented Reality System for Equipment Maintenance
816-819. [Crossref]
1369. Carmen Juan, Francesca Beatrice, Juan Cano. An Augmented Reality System for Learning the Interior of the Human
Body 186-188. [Crossref]
1370. Carmen Juan, Raffaela Canu, Miguel Giménez. Augmented Reality Interactive Storytelling Systems Using Tangible Cubes
for Edutainment 233-235. [Crossref]
1371. Xueling Wu, Qingyun Du, Fu Ren. Cognition-Based Augmented Reality Visualization of the Geospatial Data 138-142.
[Crossref]
1372. Weihua Tan, Wenjun Li, Xiaocong Zhou, Xiao-bin Zhang. Shifting from a Computer Game to a Physical Game: A Case
Study of ePet 335-338. [Crossref]
1373. John Quarles, Samsun Lampotang, Ira Fischler, Paul Fishwick, Benjamin Lok. A Mixed Reality Approach for Merging
Abstract and Concrete Knowledge 27-34. [Crossref]
1374. Gun A. Lee, Hyun Kang, Wookho Son. MIRAGE: A Touch Screen based Mixed Reality Interface for Space Planning
Applications 273-274. [Crossref]
1375. Guan Tao, Li Lijun, Wang Cheng. 2008. Registration Using Multiplanar Structures for Augmented Reality Systems.
Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 8:4, 041002. [Crossref]
1376. Dan Siewiorek, Asim Smailagic, Thad Starner. 2008. Application Design for Wearable Computing. Synthesis Lectures on
Mobile and Pervasive Computing 3:1, 1-66. [Crossref]
1377. Hong Su, Bo Kang, Xiaocheng Tang. Research and Implementation of Hybrid Tracking Techniques in Augmented
Museum Tour System 636-643. [Crossref]
1378. Sewon Na, Mark Billinghurst, Woontack Woo. TMAR: Extension of a Tabletop Interface Using Mobile Augmented
Reality 96-106. [Crossref]
1379. Maria Teresa Linaza, Ander García, Isabel Torre, Jose Ignacio Torres. Interacting with Augmented Assets in Cultural
Tourism 107-117. [Crossref]
1380. Lucio T. De Paolis, M. Pulimeno, G. Aloisio. An Augmented Reality Application for Minimally Invasive Surgery 489-492.
[Crossref]
1381. Chi Xu, Shiqi Li, Junfeng Wang, Tao Peng, Ming Xie. Occlusion Handling in Augmented Reality System for Human-
Assisted Assembly Task 121-130. [Crossref]
1382. Roger J. Jiao, Qianli Xu, Jun Du, Yiyang Zhang, Martin Helander, Halimahtun M. Khalid, Petri Helo, Cheng Ni. 2007.
Analytical affective design with ambient intelligence for mass customization and personalization. International Journal of
Flexible Manufacturing Systems 19:4, 570-595. [Crossref]
1383. Xiangyu Wang. 2007. Using Augmented Reality to Plan Virtual Construction Worksite. International Journal of Advanced
Robotic Systems 4:4, 42. [Crossref]
1384. Yu Li, Yong-Tian Wang, Yue Liu. 2007. Fiducial Marker Based on Projective Invariant for Augmented Reality. Journal
of Computer Science and Technology 22:6, 890-897. [Crossref]
1385. Kazuhiko Kobayashi, Koichi Nishiwaki, Shinji Uchiyama, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Satoshi Kagami. Viewing and reviewing
how humanoids sensed, planned and behaved with Mixed Reality technology 130-135. [Crossref]
1386. Helena Pongrac, Jan Leupold, Stephan Behrendt, Berthold Färber, Georg Färber. 2007. Human Factors for Enhancing
Live Video Streams with Virtual Reality: Performance, Situation Awareness, and Feeling of Telepresence. Presence:
Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16:5, 488-508. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1387. C.W. Nielsen, M.A. Goodrich, R.W. Ricks. 2007. Ecological Interfaces for Improving Mobile Robot Teleoperation. IEEE
Transactions on Robotics 23:5, 927-941. [Crossref]
1388. Ewoud van West, Akio Yamamoto, Toshiro Higuchi. 2007. The concept of “Haptic Tweezer”, a non-contact object
handling system using levitation techniques and haptics. Mechatronics 17:7, 345-356. [Crossref]
1389. Daisuke Nakamura, Shinsaku Hiura, Kosuke Sato. Assistance system for designing mirrored surface using projector
1489-1492. [Crossref]
1390. Jung-Woo Hyun, Itsuo Kumazawa, Makoto Sato. A new measurement methodology of multi-finger tracking for handheld
device control using mixed reality 2315-2320. [Crossref]
1391. David Mountain, Fotis Liarokapis. 2007. Mixed reality (MR) interfaces for mobile information systems. Aslib Proceedings
59:4/5, 422-436. [Crossref]
1392. Amir H. Behzadan, Vineet R. Kamat. 2007. Georeferenced Registration of Construction Graphics in Mobile Outdoor
Augmented Reality. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 21:4, 247-258. [Crossref]
1393. Hideyuki Ando, Junji Watanabe, Masahiko Inami, Maki Sugimito, Taro Maeda. 2007. A fingernail-mounted tactile display
for augmented reality systems. Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part II: Electronics) 90:4, 56-65. [Crossref]
1394. Fotis Liarokapis. 2007. An augmented reality interface for visualizing and interacting with virtual content. Virtual Reality
11:1, 23-43. [Crossref]
1395. ZhiYing Zhou, Adrian David Cheok, Yan Qiu, Xubo Yang. 2007. The Role of 3-D Sound in Human Reaction and
Performance in Augmented Reality Environments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems
and Humans 37:2, 262-272. [Crossref]
1396. Naho Inamoto, Hideo Saito. 2007. Free viewpoint video synthesis and presentation from multiple sporting videos. Electronics
and Communications in Japan (Part III: Fundamental Electronic Science) 90:2, 40-49. [Crossref]
1397. Eleanor Toye, Richard Sharp, Anil Madhavapeddy, David Scott, Eben Upton, Alan Blackwell. 2007. Interacting with
mobile services: an evaluation of camera-phones and visual tags. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11:2, 97-106.
[Crossref]
1398. Takashi Machida, Haruo Takemura, Naokazu Yokoya. 2007. Inverse reflectometry for real objects with diffuse and specular
interreflections. Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part II: Electronics) 90:1, 50-60. [Crossref]
1399. S.K. Ong, Y. Pang, A.Y.C. Nee. 2007. Augmented Reality Aided Assembly Design and Planning. CIRP Annals 56:1,
49-52. [Crossref]
1400. Jaeho Ryu, Naoki Hashimoto, Makoto Sato, Masashi Soeda, Ryuzo Ohno. 2007. Application of Human–scale Immersive
VR System for Environmental Design Assessment – A Proposal for an Architectural Design Evaluation Tool. Journal of
Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 6:1, 57-64. [Crossref]
1401. Lucinda Kerawalla, Rosemary Luckin, Simon Seljeflot, Adrian Woolard. 2006. “Making it real”: exploring the potential
of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality 10:3-4, 163-174. [Crossref]
1402. Nuno Correia, Luis Romero. 2006. Storing user experiences in mixed reality using hypermedia. The Visual Computer
22:12, 991-1001. [Crossref]
1403. Masakatsu Kourogi, Takeshi Kurata, Katsuhiko Sakaue, Yoichi Muraoka. 2006. A method and real-time implementation
for annotating broadcast video images based on alignment with a set of panoramic images. Electronics and Communications
in Japan (Part III: Fundamental Electronic Science) 89:11, 51-60. [Crossref]
1404. Sebastian Vogt, Ali Khamene, Frank Sauer. 2006. Reality Augmentation for Medical Procedures: System Architecture,
Single Camera Marker Tracking, and System Evaluation. International Journal of Computer Vision 70:2, 179-190. [Crossref]
1405. Yan Feng, Yi-min Chen. 2006. Rectification of magnetic force tracker using neural network in augmented reality system.
Journal of Shanghai University (English Edition) 10:5, 431-435. [Crossref]
1406. Antonio Calado Lopes, Jose Miguel Sales Dias. 2006. Integration of Geo-Referenced Data for Visual Simulation in
Location-Based Mobile Computing. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 21:7, 514-529. [Crossref]
1407. Amin Hammad, Cheng Zhang, Yongxin Hu, Elaheh Mozaffari. 2006. Mobile Model-Based Bridge Lifecycle Management
System. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 21:7, 530-547. [Crossref]
1408. Yong-In Yun. 2006. Three-dimensional reconstruction of an object using three-planar homography of a single image.
Optical Engineering 45:10, 103201. [Crossref]
1409. James Patton, Greg Dawe, Chris Scharver, Ferdinando Mussa-Ivaldi, Robert Kenyon. 2006. Robotics and Virtual Reality:
A Perfect Marriage for Motor Control Research and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 18:2, 181-195. [Crossref]
1410. Ronald Reisman, David Brown. Design of Augmented Reality Tools for Air Traffic Control Towers . [Crossref]
1411. F. Bruno, F. Caruso, L. nDe Napoli, M. Muzzupappa. 2006. Visualization of industrial engineering data in Augmented
Reality. Journal of Visualization 9:3, 319-329. [Crossref]
1412. M.L. Yuan, S.K. Ong, A.Y.C. Nee. 2006. Registration using natural features for augmented reality systems. IEEE
Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12:4, 569-580. [Crossref]
1413. Yue Liu,, Yongtian Wang,, Yu Li,, Jinchao Lei,, Liang Lin. 2006. Key Issues for AR-Based Digital Reconstruction of
Yuanmingyuan Garden. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15:3, 336-340. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1414. Stuart J. Gilson, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon, Andrew Glennerster. 2006. Quantitative analysis of accuracy of an inertial/acoustic
6DOF tracking system in motion. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 154:1-2, 175-182. [Crossref]
1415. Brian P. DeJong, Eric L. Faulring, J. Edward Colgate, Michael A. Peshkin, Hyosig Kang, Young S. Park, Thomas F.
Ewing. 2006. Lessons learned from a novel teleoperation testbed. Industrial Robot: An International Journal 33:3, 187-193.
[Crossref]
1416. Olaf Oehme, Ludger Schmidt, Holger Luczak, Matthias Rötting. Visual Displays in HCI . [Crossref]
1417. Takashi Machida, Haruo Takemura, Naokazu Yokoya. 2006. Dense estimation of surface reflectance property by combining
multiple illumination conditions. Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part III: Fundamental Electronic Science) 89:3,
59-69. [Crossref]
1418. Wolfgang Narzt, Gustav Pomberger, Alois Ferscha, Dieter Kolb, Reiner Müller, Jan Wieghardt, Horst Hörtner,
Christopher Lindinger. 2006. Augmented reality navigation systems. Universal Access in the Information Society 4:3, 177-187.
[Crossref]
1419. Takashi Machida, Naokazu Yokoya, Haruo Takemura. 2006. Surface reflectance modeling of real objects with
interreflections for augmented virtuality. Color Research & Application 31:1, 38-47. [Crossref]
1420. Zhigeng Pan, Adrian David Cheok, Hongwei Yang, Jiejie Zhu, Jiaoying Shi. 2006. Virtual reality and mixed reality for
virtual learning environments. Computers & Graphics 30:1, 20-28. [Crossref]
1421. Jeff Burke, Jonathan Friedman, Eitan Mendelowitz, Heemin Park, Mani B. Srivastava. 2006. Embedding expression:
Pervasive computing architecture for art and entertainment. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 2:1, 1-36. [Crossref]
1422. Yan Pang, Andrew Y.C. Nee, Soh Khim Ong, Miaolong Yuan, Kamal Youcef‐Toumi. 2006. Assembly feature design in
an augmented reality environment. Assembly Automation 26:1, 34-43. [Crossref]
1423. S. Dasgupta, A. Banerjee. 2006. An augmented-reality-based real-time panoramic vision system for autonomous navigation.
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 36:1, 154-161. [Crossref]
1424. Yuko Uematsu, Hideo Saito. 2006. On-line Augmented Reality System by Integration of Multiple Planar Markers Placed
in Arbitrary Positions and Directions. The Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers 60:6,
909-919. [Crossref]
1425. Hiroaki SAWANO, Minoru OKADA. 2006. Real-time Video Processing by a Car-mounted Camera and Its Application
to Car Navigation Systems by an Augmented Reality-based Display Method. The Journal of the Society for Art and Science
5:2, 57-68. [Crossref]
1426. Rodney Berry, Mao Makino, Naoto Hikawa, Masahide Naemura, Yusuf Pisan, Ernest Edmonds. 2006. Programming in
the world. Digital Creativity 17:1, 36-48. [Crossref]
1427. Vineet R. Kamat, Amir H. Behzadan. GPS and 3DOF Tracking for Georeferenced Registration of Construction Graphics
in Outdoor Augmented Reality 368-375. [Crossref]
1428. Lars Winkler Pettersson, Andreas Kjellin, Mats Lind, Stefan Seipel. Effects of Layer Partitioning in Collaborative 3D
Visualizations 180-190. [Crossref]
1429. Liselott Brunnberg, Oskar Juhlin. Keep Your Eyes on the Road and Your Finger on the Trigger – Designing for Mixed
Focus of Attention in a Mobile Game for Brief Encounters 169-186. [Crossref]
1430. Yan Feng, Yimin Chen, Minghui Wang. Multi-sensor Data Fusion Based on Fuzzy Integral in AR System 155-162.
[Crossref]
1431. Koji Makita, Masayuki Kanbara, Naokazu Yokoya. Personal Information Annotation on Wearable Computer Users with
Hybrid Peer-to-Peer Communication 217-227. [Crossref]
1432. Z. Y. Ma, Y. P. Chen, C. M. Yuan, Z. D. Zhou. An Efficient 3D Registration Method Using Markerless Image in AR-
Based CNC Machining Simulation 175-184. [Crossref]
1433. Bo Kang, Peng Ren, Changzhi Ke. An Augmented Reality System for Computer Maintenance 284-291. [Crossref]
1434. Monica Rubio, Arturo Quintana, Hebert Pérez-Rosés, Ricardo Quirós, Emilio Camahort. Jittering Reduction in Marker-
Based Augmented Reality Systems 510-517. [Crossref]
1435. Youngmin Park, Woontack Woo. The ARTable: An AR-Based Tangible User Interface System 1198-1207. [Crossref]
1436. Imari Sato, Morihiro Hayashida, Fumiyo Kai, Yoichi Sato, Katsushi Ikeuchi. 2005. Fast image synthesis of virtual objects
in a real scene with natural shadings. Systems and Computers in Japan 36:14, 102-111. [Crossref]
1437. M.L. Yuan, S.K. Ong, A.Y.C. Nee. 2005. A generalized registration method for augmented reality systems. Computers
& Graphics 29:6, 980-997. [Crossref]
1438. W. Broll, I. Lindt, J. Ohlenburg, I. Herbst, M. Wittkamper, T. Novotny. 2005. An infrastructure for realizing custom-
tailored augmented reality user interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11:6, 722-733.
[Crossref]
1439. Ta Huynh Duy Nguyen, Tran Cong Thien Qui, Ke Xu, A.D. Cheok, Sze Lee Teo, ZhiYing Zhou, A. Mallawaarachchi,
Shang Ping Lee, Wei Liu, Hui Siang Teo, Le Nam Thang, Yu Li, H. Kato. 2005. Real-Time 3D Human Capture System
for Mixed-Reality Art and Entertainment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11:6, 706-721.
[Crossref]
1440. Nickolas D. Macchiarella, Dahai Liu, Sathya N. Gangadharan, Dennis A. Vincenzi, Anthony E. Majoros. 2005. Augmented
Reality as a Training Medium for Aviation/Aerospace Application. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Annual Meeting 49:25, 2174-2178. [Crossref]
1441. . Bibliography 343-361. [Crossref]
1442. Hee Lin Wang, Kuntal Sengupta, Pankaj Kumar, Rajeev Sharma. 2005. Occlusion Handling in Augmented Reality Using
Background-Foreground Segmentation and Projective Geometry. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14:3,
264-277. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1443. F. Farbiz, A.D. Cheok, Liu Wei, Zhou ZhiYing, Xu Ke, S. Prince, M. Billinghurst, H. Kato. 2005. Live three-dimensional
content for augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 7:3, 514-523. [Crossref]
1444. Christian Sandor, Gudrun Klinker. 2005. A rapid prototyping software infrastructure for user interfaces in ubiquitous
augmented reality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 9:3, 169-185. [Crossref]
1445. M.L. Yuan, S.K. Ong, A.Y.C. Nee. 2005. Registration Based on Projective Reconstruction Technique for Augmented
Reality Systems. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11:3, 254-264. [Crossref]
1446. C.M. Botella, M.C. Juan, R.M. Baños, M. Alcañiz, V. Guillén, B. Rey. 2005. Mixing Realities? An Application of
Augmented Reality for the Treatment of Cockroach Phobia. CyberPsychology & Behavior 8:2, 162-171. [Crossref]
1447. Noa Rensing. 2005. Registration of an on-axis see-through head-mounted display and camera system. Optical Engineering
44:2, 024002. [Crossref]
1448. Margarita Anastassova, Jean-Marie Burkhardt, Christine Mégard, Pierre Ehanno. 2005. Results from a user-centred critical
incidents study for guiding future implementation of augmented reality in automotive maintenance. International Journal
of Industrial Ergonomics 35:1, 67-77. [Crossref]
1449. Hansung Kim, Kwanghoon Sohn. 2005. 3D reconstruction from stereo images for interactions between real and virtual
objects. Signal Processing: Image Communication 20:1, 61-75. [Crossref]
1450. C.S.-T. Choy, Ka-Chun Lu, Wing-Ming Chow, Ka-Man Sit, Ka-Hing Lay, W. Ho. Mixed reality head-mounted display
427-428. [Crossref]
1451. Ali M. Malkawi, Ravi S. Srinivasan. 2005. Interfacing with the Real Space and its Performance. International Journal of
Architectural Computing 3:1, 43-56. [Crossref]
1452. F. Javier Toledo, J. Javier Martínez, F. Javier Garrigós, J. Manuel Ferrández. An Augmented Reality Visual Prothesis for
People Affected by Tunneling Vision 319-326. [Crossref]
1453. Usman Sargaana, Hossein S. Farahani, Jong Weon Lee, Jeha Ryu, Woontack Woo. Collaborative billiARds: Towards the
Ultimate Gaming Experience 357-367. [Crossref]
1454. Changzhi Ke, Bo Kang, Dongyi Chen, Xinyu Li. An Augmented Reality-Based Application for Equipment Maintenance
836-841. [Crossref]
1455. Ki Woon Kwon, Sung Wook Baik, Seong-Whan Lee. Estimating 3D Object Coordinates from Markerless Scenes 850-853.
[Crossref]
1456. Luiz Fernando Braga Lopes, Antonio Carlos Sementille, José Remo Ferreira Brega, Fátima L. S. Nunes Marques, Ildeberto
Aparecido Rodello. ARISupport – Interaction Support for Augmented Reality Systems 329-336. [Crossref]
1457. Edward Rosten, Gerhard Reitmayr, Tom Drummond. Real-Time Video Annotations for Augmented Reality 294-302.
[Crossref]
1458. C. Yuan. Visual Tracking for Seamless 3D Interactions in Augmented Reality 321-328. [Crossref]
1459. J. B. Kim, J. M. Lee, H. S. Jun. A Personal Locating System Using the Vision-Based Augmented Reality 1262-1266.
[Crossref]
1460. Jong-Seung Park, Mee Young Sung, Sung-Ryul Noh. Virtual Object Placement in Video for Augmented Reality 13-24.
[Crossref]
1461. Jongeun Cha, Beom-Chan Lee, Jong-phil Kim, Seungjun Kim, Jeha Ryu. Smooth Haptic Interaction in Broadcasted
Augmented Reality 1046-1049. [Crossref]
1462. Giancarlo Iannizzotto, Francesco La Rosa, Carlo Costanzo, Pietro Lanzafame. A Multimodal Perceptual User Interface for
Collaborative Environments 115-122. [Crossref]
1463. Yuko Uematsu, Hideo Saito. Vision-Based Registration for Augmented Reality with Integration of Arbitrary Multiple
Planes 155-162. [Crossref]
1464. Brahim Nini, Mohamed Batouche. Real Time Virtualized Real Object Manipulation in an Augmented Reality
Environment 477-486. [Crossref]
1465. F. Javier Toledo, J. Javier Martínez, F. Javier Garrigós, J. Manuel Ferrández. Image Processing with CNN in a FPGA-Based
Augmented Reality System for Visually Impaired People 906-912. [Crossref]
1466. Hyung W. Kang, Sung Yong Shin. 2004. Creating Walk-Through Images from a Video Sequence of a Dynamic Scene.
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13:6, 638-655. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1467. Sara Keren, Ilan Shimshoni, Ayellet Tal. 2004. Placing Three-Dimensional Models in an Uncalibrated Single Image of
an Architectural Scene. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13:6, 692-707. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1468. Zhiying Zhou, Adrian David Cheok, Xubo Yang, Yan Qiu. 2004. An experimental study on the role of 3D sound in
augmented reality environment. Interacting with Computers 16:6, 1043-1068. [Crossref]
1469. Guangqi Ye, Jason J. Corso, Darius Burschka, Gregory D. Hager. 2004. VICs: A modular HCI framework using
spatiotemporal dynamics. Machine Vision and Applications 16:1, 13-20. [Crossref]
1470. Abhilash Pandya, Gregory Auner. 2004. Robotics technology: a journey into the future. Urologic Clinics of North America
31:4, 793-800. [Crossref]
1471. A. Fusiello, V. Murino. 2004. Augmented scene modeling and visualization by optical and acoustic sensor integration. IEEE
Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 10:6, 625-636. [Crossref]
1472. A.P. Kiraly, J.P. Helferty, E.A. Hoffman, G. McLennan, W.E. Higgins. 2004. Three-Dimensional Path Planning for
Virtual Bronchoscopy. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 23:11, 1365-1379. [Crossref]
1473. Teresa Romão, Nuno Correia, Eduardo Dias, José Danado, Adelaide Trabuco, Carlos Santos, Rossana Santos, António
Câmara, Edmundo Nobre. 2004. ANTS—Augmented Environments. Computers & Graphics 28:5, 625-633. [Crossref]
1474. Zhiying Zhou, Adrian David Cheok, Xubo Yang, Yan Qiu. 2004. An experimental study on the role of software synthesized
3D sound in augmented reality environments. Interacting with Computers 16:5, 989-1016. [Crossref]
1475. Ulrich Neumann, Suya You, Jinhui Hu, Bolan Jiang, Ismail Oner Sebe. 2004. Visualizing Reality in an Augmented Virtual
Environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13:2, 222-233. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1476. A. Liverani, G. Amati, G. Caligiana. 2004. A CAD-augmented Reality Integrated Environment for Assembly Sequence
Check and Interactive Validation. Concurrent Engineering 12:1, 67-77. [Crossref]
1477. Michael F. Zäh, Thomas Fusch, Patrick Neise. 2004. Integrative Fabrikplanung mit virtuellen Produktionsmodellen. ZWF
Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 99:1-2, 54-57. [Crossref]
1478. H. Kajimoto, N. Kawakami, S. Tachi, M. Inami. 2004. SmartTouch: electric skin to touch the untouchable. IEEE
Computer Graphics and Applications 24:1, 36-43. [Crossref]
1479. ZHENCHENG HU, KEIICHI UCHIMURA. 2004. SOLUTION OF CAMERA REGISTRATION PROBLEM VIA
3D-2D PARAMETERIZED MODEL MATCHING FOR ON-ROAD NAVIGATION. International Journal of Image
and Graphics 04:01, 3-20. [Crossref]
1480. A. Penn, C. Mottram, A. Fatah gen. Schieck, M. Wittkämper, M. Störring, O. Romell, A. Strothmann, F. Aish.
Augmented Reality Meeting Table: a Novel Multi-User Interface for Architectural Design 213-231. [Crossref]
1481. Ryo Yamada, Katsumi Kishimoto. 2004. An Augmented Reality based 3D Catalog. IEEJ Transactions on Industry
Applications 124:1, 24-30. [Crossref]
1482. Z. Hu, U. Keiichi, H. Lu, F. Lamosa. Fusion of vision, 3D gyro and GPS for camera dynamic registration 351-354 Vol.3.
[Crossref]
1483. C. Dehais, M. Douze, G. Morin, V. Charvillat. Augmented reality through real-time tracking of video sequences using
a panoramic view 995-998 Vol.4. [Crossref]
1484. B. Giesler, T. Salb, P. Steinhaus, R. Dillmann. Using augmented reality to interact with an autonomous mobile platform
1009-1014 Vol.1. [Crossref]
1485. Wolfgang Broll, Stefan Grünvogel, Iris Herbst, Irma Lindt, Martin Maercker Jan Ohlenburg, Michael Wittkämper.
Interactive Props and Choreography Planning with the Mixed Reality Stage 185-192. [Crossref]
1486. S. Schkolne, H. Ishii, P. Schroder. Immersive design of DNA molecules with a tangible interface 227-234. [Crossref]
1487. José Miguel Salles Dias, Pedro Santos, Rafael Bastos. Gesturing with Tangible Interfaces for Mixed Reality 399-408.
[Crossref]
1488. Makoto Kurahashi, Andrej van der Zee, Eiji Tokunaga, Masahiro Nemoto, Tatsuo Nakajima. System Support for
Distributed Augmented Reality in Ubiquitous Computing Environments 279-295. [Crossref]
1489. Nancy Rodriguez, Luis Jose Pulido, Jean-Pierre Jessel. Enhancing a Telerobotics Java Tool with Augmented Reality 9-18.
[Crossref]
1490. Michael Bang Nielsen, Gunnar Kramp, Kaj Grønbæk. Mobile Augmented Reality Support for Architects Based on Feature
Tracking Techniques 921-928. [Crossref]
1491. Jamie Sands, Shaun W. Lawson, David Benyon. Target Selection in Augmented Reality Worlds 936-945. [Crossref]
1492. Toshiharu Sugawara, Satoshi Kurihara, Shigemi Aoyagi, Koji Sato, Toshihiro Takada. An Implementation for Capturing
Clickable Moving Objects 441-450. [Crossref]
1493. Koji Makita, Masayuki Kanbara, Naokazu Yokoya. Shared Annotation Database for Networked Wearable Augmented
Reality System 499-507. [Crossref]
1494. Jong Bae Kim. 2003. A personal identity annotation overlay system using a wearable computer for augmented reality. IEEE
Transactions on Consumer Electronics 49:4, 1457-1467. [Crossref]
1495. Dennis A. Vincenzi, Brian Valimont, Nickolas Macchiarella, Chris Opalenik, Sathya N. Gangadharan, Anthony E. Majoros.
2003. The Effectiveness of Cognitive Elaboration Using Augmented Reality as a Training and Learning Paradigm.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 47:19, 2054-2058. [Crossref]
1496. W.J. Plesniak, R.S. Pappu, S.A. Benton. 2003. Haptic holography: a primitive computational plastic. Proceedings of the
IEEE 91:9, 1443-1456. [Crossref]
1497. Emmanuel Dubois, Philip Gray, Laurence Nigay. 2003. ASUR++: Supporting the design of mobile mixed systems.
Interacting with Computers 15:4, 497-520. [Crossref]
1498. Hannes Kaufmann, Dieter Schmalstieg. 2003. Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality.
Computers & Graphics 27:3, 339-345. [Crossref]
1499. Shunsuke Harasaki, Hideo Saito. 2003. Virtual object overlay onto uncalibrated camera images for augmented reality.
Systems and Computers in Japan 34:5, 47-55. [Crossref]
1500. A. Ansar, K. Daniilidis. 2003. Linear pose estimation from points or lines. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and
Machine Intelligence 25:5, 578-589. [Crossref]
1501. W. Pasman, F.W. Jansen. 2003. Comparing simplification and image-based techniques for 3D client-server rendering
systems. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 9:2, 226-240. [Crossref]
1502. M. Mitschke, N. Navab. 2003. Recovering the X-ray projection geometry for three-dimensional tomographic
reconstruction with additional sensors: Attached camera versus external navigation system. Medical Image Analysis 7:1,
65-78. [Crossref]
1503. Winyu Chinthammit, Eric J. Seibel, Thomas A. Furness III. 2003. A Shared-Aperture Tracking Display for Augmented
Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12:1, 1-18. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1504. Francisco Abad, Emilio Camahort, Roberto Vivó. 2003. Integrating synthetic objects into real scenes. Computers & Graphics
27:1, 5-17. [Crossref]
1505. Makoto Sato, Yasuharu Koike, Somsak Walairacht. Playing Rubik’s Cube in Mixed Reality 415-422. [Crossref]
1506. Simon J. D. Prince, Adrian David Cheok, Farzam Farbiz, Todd Williamson, Nik Johnson, Mark Billinghurst, Hirokazu
Kato. 3D Live Humans in Mixed Reality Entertainment 503-510. [Crossref]
1507. G. Reinhart, C. Patron. 2003. Integrating Augmented Reality in the Assembly Domain - Fundamentals, Benefits and
Applications. CIRP Annals 52:1, 5-8. [Crossref]
1508. Sinem Guven, Steven Feiner. 2003. A hypermedia authoring tool for augmented and virtual reality. New Review of
Hypermedia and Multimedia 9:1, 89-116. [Crossref]
1509. Patrick A. S. Sinclair, Kirk Martinez, David E. Millard, Mark J. Weal. 2003. Augmented reality as an interface to adaptive
hypermedia systems. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 9:1, 117-136. [Crossref]
1510. Machida, Yokoya, Takemura. Surface reflectance modeling of real objects with interreflections 170-177 vol.1. [Crossref]
1511. Guangqi Ye, Jason Corso, Darius Burschka, Gregory D. Hager. VICs: A Modular Vision-Based HCI Framework 257-267.
[Crossref]
1512. Dana Cobzas, Martin Jagersand. A Comparison of Viewing Geometries for Augmented Reality 501-508. [Crossref]
1513. Claus B. Madsen. Using Real Shadows to Create Virtual Ones 820-827. [Crossref]
1514. Carlos Santos, Nuno Correia. A Navigation and Registration System for Mobile and Augmented Environments 410-414.
[Crossref]
1515. Jun Park. Mobile Tele-instruction Using Interactive Augmented Reality 461-465. [Crossref]
1516. G. Welch, E. Foxlin. 2002. Motion tracking: no silver bullet, but a respectable arsenal. IEEE Computer Graphics and
Applications 22:6, 24-38. [Crossref]
1517. Lin Chai, William A. Hoff, Tyrone Vincent. 2002. Three-Dimensional Motion and Structure Estimation Using Inertial
Sensors and Computer Vision for Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11:5, 474-492.
[Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1518. Michael Rosenthal, Andrei State, Joohi Lee, Gentaro Hirota, Jeremy Ackerman, Kurtis Keller, Etta D Pisano, Michael
Jiroutek, Keith Muller, Henry Fuchs. 2002. Augmented reality guidance for needle biopsies: An initial randomized,
controlled trial in phantoms††A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the Medical Image Computing and
Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2001 conference in Utrecht. The Netherlands (Rosenthal et al., 2001). Medical
Image Analysis 6:3, 313-320. [Crossref]
1519. Éric Marchand, François Chaumette. 2002. Virtual Visual Servoing: a framework for real-time augmented reality. Computer
Graphics Forum 21:3, 289-297. [Crossref]
1520. W. Birkfellner, M. Figl, K. Huber, F. Watzinger, F. Wanschitz, J. Hummel, R. Hanel, W. Greimel, P. Homolka, R. Ewers,
H. Bergmann. 2002. A head-mounted operating binocular for augmented reality visualization in medicine - design and
initial evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 21:8, 991-997. [Crossref]
1521. Gunther Reinhart, Christian Patron. 2002. Nutzenorientierte Integration von Virtual und Augmented Reality. ZWF
Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 97:4, 205-208. [Crossref]
1522. Somsak Walairacht, Keita Yamada, Shoichi Hasegawa, Yasuharu Koike, Makoto Sato. 2002. 4 + 4 Fingers Manipulating
Virtual Objects in Mixed-Reality Environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11:2, 134-143. [Abstract]
[PDF] [PDF Plus]
1523. Yuichi Ohta, Yasuyuki Sugaya, Hiroki Igarashi, Toshikazu Ohtsuki, Kaito Taguchi. 2002. Share-Z: Client/Server Depth
Sensing for See-Through Head-Mounted Displays. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11:2, 176-188.
[Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1524. I. Poupyrev, D.S. Tan, M. Billinghurst, H. Kato, H. Regenbrecht, N. Tetsutani. 2002. Developing a generic augmented-
reality interface. Computer 35:3, 44-50. [Crossref]
1525. Kyung H. Chung, John P. Shewchuk, Robert C. Williges. 2002. An analysis framework for applying virtual environment
technology to manufacturing tasks. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 12:4, 335-348. [Crossref]
1526. Adnan Ansar, Kostas Daniilidis. Linear Pose Estimation from Points or Lines 282-296. [Crossref]
1527. Emmanuel Dubois, Philip Gray, Laurence Nigay. ASUR++: A Design Notation for Mobile Mixed Systems 123-139.
[Crossref]
1528. Emmanuel Dubois, Paulo Pinheiro da Silva, Philip Gray. Notational Support for the Design of Augmented Reality Systems
74-88. [Crossref]
1529. James E. Mower. Implementing an Augmented Scene Delivery System 174-183. [Crossref]
1530. Oliver Bimber, L. Miguel Encarnação, Pedro Branco. 2001. The Extended Virtual Table: An Optical Extension for Table-
Like Projection Systems. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10:6, 613-631. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1531. R. Azuma, Y. Baillot, R. Behringer, S. Feiner, S. Julier, B. MacIntyre. 2001. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE
Computer Graphics and Applications 21:6, 34-47. [Crossref]
1532. H. Tamura, H. Yamamoto, A. Katayama. 2001. Mixed reality: future dreams seen at the border between real and virtual
worlds. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21:6, 64-70. [Crossref]
1533. Holger Regenbrecht, Gregory Baratoff, Michael Wagner. 2001. A tangible AR desktop environment. Computers & Graphics
25:5, 755-763. [Crossref]
1534. Adnan Ansar, Denilson Rodrigues, Jaydev P. Desai, Kostas Daniilidis, Vijay Kumar, Mario F.M. Campos. 2001. Visual
and haptic collaborative tele-presence. Computers & Graphics 25:5, 789-798. [Crossref]
1535. Laura Johnson, Leila Eadie, Darryl de Cunha, Philip Edwards, David Hawkes. 2001. The Limits of Transparent Depth
Perception with Restricted Field of View: Application in an Augmented Reality Surgical Microscope. Proceedings of the
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 45:18, 1438-1442. [Crossref]
1536. Martin White, Emmanuel Jay, Fotis Liarokapis, Costas Kostakis, Paul Lister. 2001. A Virtual Interactive Teaching
Environment Using XML and Augmented Reality. International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education 38:4,
316-329. [Crossref]
1537. Jie Shen, Yonghong Wu, Haowu Liu. 2001. Urban Planning Using Augmented Reality. Journal of Urban Planning and
Development 127:3, 118-125. [Crossref]
1538. S. Pradhan, C. Brignone, Jun-Hong Cui, A. McReynolds, M.T. Smith. 2001. Websigns: hyperlinking physical locations
to the Web. Computer 34:8, 42-48. [Crossref]
1539. Li-Te Cheng, J. Robinson. 2001. Personal contextual awareness through visual focus. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16:3, 16-20.
[Crossref]
1540. Koji Teramoto, Masahiko Onosato. In-process visualization of machining state with sensor-based simulation to support
the recognition ability of operators 389-394. [Crossref]
1541. F. Dai. 2001. Remote Supervision and Task-level Control of Industrial Robot Systems Using Augmented Visions
(Fernüberwachung und aufgaben-orientierte Steuerung von Industrierobotersystemen über Augmented Vision). at -
Automatisierungstechnik 49:7/2001. . [Crossref]
1542. Emmanuel Dubois, Laurence Nigay, Jocelyne Troccaz. Consistency in Augmented Reality Systems 111-122. [Crossref]
1543. Hans Hagen, Achim Ebert, Rolf Hendrik van Lengen, Gerik Scheuermann. Scientific Visualization - Methods and
Applications - 311-327. [Crossref]
1544. Steve Benford, John Bowers, Paul Chandler, Luigina Ciolfi, Martin Flintham, Mike Fraser, Chris Greenhalgh, Tony Hall,
Sten Olof Hellström, Shahram Izadi, Tom Rodden, Holger Schnädelbach, Ian Taylor. Unearthing Virtual History: Using
Diverse Interfaces to Reveal Hidden Virtual Worlds 225-231. [Crossref]
1545. Michael Rosenthal, Andrei State, Joohi Lee, Gentaro Hirota, Jeremy Ackerman, Kurtis Keller, Etta D. Pisano, Michael
Jiroutek, Keith Muller, Henry Fuchs. Augmented Reality Guidance for Needle Biopsies: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
in Phantoms 240-248. [Crossref]
1546. Frank Biocca, David Lamas, Ping Gai, Robert Brady. Mapping the Semantic Asymmetries of Virtual and Augmented
Reality Space 117-122. [Crossref]
1547. C. Loscos, G. Drettakis, L. Robert. 2000. Interactive virtual relighting of real scenes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization
and Computer Graphics 6:4, 289-305. [Crossref]
1548. W. Hoff, T. Vincent. 2000. Analysis of head pose accuracy in augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and
Computer Graphics 6:4, 319-334. [Crossref]
1549. Yongduek Seo, Ki Sang Hong. 2000. Calibration-free augmented reality in perspective. IEEE Transactions on Visualization
and Computer Graphics 6:4, 346-359. [Crossref]
1550. Jeffrey W. McCandless, Stephen R. Ellis, Bernard D. Adelstein. 2000. Localization of a Time-Delayed, Monocular Virtual
Object Superimposed on a Real Environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9:1, 15-24. [Abstract]
[PDF] [PDF Plus]
1551. Ya Zhou, Yongtian Wang, Dayuan Yan, Tong Xu. Vision-Based Registration Using 3-D Fiducial for Augmented Reality
510-517. [Crossref]
1552. Tobias Höllerer, Steven Feiner, Tachio Terauchi, Gus Rashid, Drexel Hallaway. 1999. Exploring MARS: developing
indoor and outdoor user interfaces to a mobile augmented reality system. Computers & Graphics 23:6, 779-785. [Crossref]
1553. Ronald Azuma, Jong Weon Lee, Bolan Jiang, Jun Park, Suya You, Ulrich Neumann. 1999. Tracking in unprepared
environments for augmented reality systems. Computers & Graphics 23:6, 787-793. [Crossref]
1554. Anton Fuhrmann, Gerd Hesina, François Faure, Michael Gervautz. 1999. Occlusion in collaborative augmented
environments. Computers & Graphics 23:6, 809-819. [Crossref]
1555. Reinhold Behringer, Steven Chen, Venkataraman Sundareswaran, Kenneth Wang, Marius Vassiliou. 1999. A distributed
device diagnostics system utilizing augmented reality and 3D audio. Computers & Graphics 23:6, 821-825. [Crossref]
1556. W Pasman, A van der Schaaf, R.L Lagendijk, F.W Jansen. 1999. Accurate overlaying for mobile augmented reality.
Computers & Graphics 23:6, 875-881. [Crossref]
1557. Frank Seibert. 1999. Augmenting reality by using uncalibrated optical tracking. Computers & Graphics 23:6, 801-804.
[Crossref]
1558. Michelle Yeh, Christopher D. Wickens, F. Jacob Seagull. 1999. Target Cuing in Visual Search: The Effects of Conformality
and Display Location on the Allocation of Visual Attention. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and
Ergonomics Society 41:4, 524-542. [Crossref]
1559. K. M. Baird, W. Barfield. 1999. Evaluating the effectiveness of augmented reality displays for a manual assembly task.
Virtual Reality 4:4, 250-259. [Crossref]
1560. S. You, U. Neumann, R. Azuma. 1999. Orientation tracking for outdoor augmented reality registration. IEEE Computer
Graphics and Applications 19:6, 36-42. [Crossref]
1561. Aaron F. Bobick, Stephen S. Intille, James W. Davis, Freedom Baird, Claudio S. Pinhanez, Lee W. Campbell, Yuri A.
Ivanov, Arjan Schütte, Andrew Wilson. 1999. The KidsRoom: A Perceptually-Based Interactive and Immersive Story
Environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8:4, 369-393. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1562. Yasuyoshi Yokokohji, Ralph L. Hollis, Takeo Kanade. 1999. WYSIWYF Display: A Visual/Haptic Interface to Virtual
Environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8:4, 412-434. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
1563. V. Raghavan, J. Molineros, R. Sharma. 1999. Interactive evaluation of assembly sequences using augmented reality. IEEE
Transactions on Robotics and Automation 15:3, 435-449. [Crossref]
1564. Stella Mills, Jan Noyes. 1999. Virtual reality: an overview of User-related Design Issues. Interacting with Computers 11:4,
375-386. [Crossref]
1565. Kyung H. Chung, John P. Shewchuk, Robert C. Williges. 1999. An application of augmented reality to thickness inspection.
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 9:4, 331-342. [Crossref]
1566. S.C-Y. Lu, M. Shpitalni, Rajit Gadh. 1999. Virtual and Augmented Reality Technologies for Product Realization. CIRP
Annals 48:2, 471-495. [Crossref]
1567. I. Sato, Y. Sato, K. Ikeuchi. 1999. Acquiring a radiance distribution to superimpose virtual objects onto a real scene. IEEE
Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 5:1, 1-12. [Crossref]
1568. T. Masaki, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Kitamura, F. Kishino. An application of interactive video contents to augmented virtuality
334-337 vol.2. [Crossref]
1569. Toshihiro Masaki, Tetsuya Yamaguchi, Yoshifumi Kitamura. An Interactive Digital Fishtank Based on Live Video Images
386-396. [Crossref]
1570. Steven Feiner, Blair MacIntyre, Tobias Höllerer. Wearing It Out: First Steps Toward Mobile Augmented Reality Systems
363-377. [Crossref]
1571. Imari Sato, Yoichi Sato, Katsushi Ikeuchi. A Method for Estimating Illumination Distribution of a Real Scene Based on
Soft Shadows 44-58. [Crossref]
1572. Jennica Falk, Johan Redström, Staffan Björk. Amplifying Reality 274-279. [Crossref]
1573. John Pretlove. 1998. Augmenting reality for telerobotics: unifying real and virtual worlds. Industrial Robot: An International
Journal 25:6, 401-407. [Crossref]
1574. Michelle Yeh, Christopher D. Wickens, F. Jacob Seagull. 1998. Conformality and Target Cueing: Presentation of
Symbology in Augmented Reality. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 42:21,
1526-1530. [Crossref]
1575. Ronald Moore, Charles Pope, Eric Foxlin. Toward minimal latency simulation systems . [Crossref]
1576. Z. Soferman, D. Blythe, N.W. John. 1998. Advanced graphics behind medical virtual reality: evolution of algorithms,
hardware, and software interfaces. Proceedings of the IEEE 86:3, 531-554. [Crossref]
1577. K.N. Kutulakos, J.R. Vallino. 1998. Calibration-free augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer
Graphics 4:1, 1-20. [Crossref]
1578. Arkady Retik, Gordon Mair, Richard Fryer, Douglas McGregor. Integrating virtual reality and telepresence to remotely
monitor construction sites: A ViRTUE project 459-463. [Crossref]
1579. Zhencheng Hu, K. Uchimura. Dynamical road modeling and matching for direct visual navigation 237-241. [Crossref]
1580. G.D. Stetten, V.S. Chib, R.J. Tamburo. Tomographic reflection to merge ultrasound images with direct vision 200-205.
[Crossref]
1581. M. Grafe, R. Wortmann, H. Westphal. AR-based interactive exploration of a museum exhibit 5. [Crossref]
1582. M.T. Wagner, H.T. Regenbrecht. Shared reality meeting - a collaborative augmented reality environment 2. [Crossref]
1583. J. Abdullah, K. Martinez. Camera self-calibration for the ARToolKit 5. [Crossref]
1584. E.E. Hemayed. A survey of camera self-calibration 351-357. [Crossref]
1585. A. Shahrokni, L. Vacchetti, V. Lepetit, P. Fua. Polyhedral object detection and pose estimation for augmented reality
applications 65-69. [Crossref]
1586. S. Balcisoy, R. Torre, M. Ponder, P. Fua, D. Thalmann. Augmented reality for real and virtual humans 303-307. [Crossref]
1587. S. Wesugi, K. Ishikawa, T. Katayama, Y. Miwa. Representations of bodily interaction on networked "Lazy Susan" 223-228.
[Crossref]
1588. J. Mendelsohn, K. Daniilidis. Constrained self-calibration 581-587. [Crossref]
1589. M.M. Mischke, N. Navab. Recovering projection geometry: how a cheap camera can outperform an expensive stereo
system 193-200. [Crossref]
1590. K.N. Kutulakos. Altering reality through interactive image and video manipulation 72-77. [Crossref]
1591. Y. Yokokohji. A visual/haptic interface to virtual environment (WYSIWYF display) and its application 99-104. [Crossref]
1592. H. Takakura, Y. Banjou, Y. Kambayashi, F. Xerox. Visual user interface for spatial databases combined with landscape
images and sensors 237-246. [Crossref]
1593. N.D. Macchiarella, D.A. Vincenzi. Augmented reality in a learning paradigm for flight aerospace maintenance training
5.D.1-5.1-9. [Crossref]
1594. T. Turunen, T. Lankila, T. Pyssysalo, J. Roning. Realization of mobile augmented reality based personal navigation services
in 3rd generation cellular networks 100-105. [Crossref]
1595. H. Kajimoto, M. Inami, N. Kawakami, S. Tachi. SmartTouch - augmentation of skin sensation with electrocutaneous
display 40-46. [Crossref]
1596. Taeone Kim, Yong-Duck Seo, Ki-Sang Hong. Improving AR using shadows arising from natural illumination distribution
in video sequences 329-334. [Crossref]
1597. A. Valinetti, A. Fusiello, V. Murino. Model tracking for video-based virtual reality 372-377. [Crossref]
1598. N. Zenati, N. Zerhouni, K. Achour. Assistance to maintenance in industrial process using an augmented reality system
848-852. [Crossref]
1599. Bolan Jiang, Suya You, U. Neumann. Camera tracking for augmented reality media 1637-1640. [Crossref]
1600. M. Kourogi, T. Kurata, K. Sakaue, Y. Muraoka. A panorama-based technique for annotation overlay and its real-time
implementation 657-660. [Crossref]
1601. T. Okuma, K. Kiyokawa, H. Takemura, N. Yokoya. An augmented reality system using a real-time vision based registration
1226-1229. [Crossref]
1602. M. Kanbara, H. Iwasa, H. Takemura, N. Yokoya. A stereo vision-based augmented reality system with a wide range of
registration 147-151. [Crossref]
1603. T. Masaki, T. Yamauchi, Y. Kitamura, F. Kishino. Generating images with interactive manipulation and its model capture
473-476. [Crossref]
1604. T. Okuma, K. Sakaue, H. Takemura, N. Yokoya. Real-time camera parameter estimation from images for a mixed reality
system 482-486. [Crossref]
1605. C. Duchesne, J.-Y. Herve. A point-based approach to the interposition problem in augmented reality 261-265. [Crossref]
1606. M. Kanbara, N. Yokoya, H. Takemura. Registration for stereo vision-based augmented reality based on extendible tracking
of markers and natural features 1045-1048. [Crossref]
1607. T. Nakagawa, T. Sano, Y. Nakatani. Plant maintenance support system by augmented reality 768-773. [Crossref]
1608. K. Ikeuchi, Y. Sato, K. Nishino, I. Sato. Appearance modeling for mixed reality: photometric aspects 36-41. [Crossref]
1609. C. Duchesne, J.-Y. Herve. Comparison of matching criteria for the interposition problem in augmented reality 1013-1018.
[Crossref]
1610. J.-Y. Herve, C. Duchesne, V. Pradines. Dynamic registration for augmented reality in telerobotics applications 1348-1353.
[Crossref]
1611. Xiaobu Yuan, S.X. Yang. Reactive assembly planning in a dynamic virtual environment 1436-1441. [Crossref]
1612. N.M. Sgouros, S. Kousidou. Implementing media-driven behaviors in groups of autonomous mobile robots 690-695.
[Crossref]
1613. Zonglei Huang, B. Boufama. A semi-automatic camera calibration method for augmented reality 6. [Crossref]
1614. D. Balazs, E. Attila. Volumetric Medical Intervention Aiding Augmented Reality Device 1091-1096. [Crossref]
1615. R. Yamada, K. Kishimoto. Development of an augmented reality based 3D catalog for electronic commerce 3001-3006.
[Crossref]
1616. J.-P. Tardif, S. Roy, J. Meunier. Projector-based augmented reality in surgery without calibration 548-551. [Crossref]
1617. K. Ikeuchi. Modeling from reality 117-124. [Crossref]
1618. A. Takagi, S. Yamazaki, Y. Saito, N. Taniguchi. Development of a stereo video see-through HMD for AR systems 68-77.
[Crossref]
1619. M. Kanbara, H. Fujii, H. Takemura, N. Yokoya. A stereo vision-based augmented reality system with an inertial sensor
97-100. [Crossref]
1620. Yongduek Seo, Ki-Sang Hong. Weakly calibrated video-based augmented reality: embedding and rendering through virtual
camera 129-136. [Crossref]
1621. G. Stetten, V. Chib, D. Hildebrand, J. Bursee. Real time tomographic reflection: phantoms for calibration and biopsy
11-19. [Crossref]
1622. M. Figl, W. Birkfellner, J. Hummel, R. Hanel, P. Homolka, F. Watzinger, F. Wanshit, R. Ewers, H. Bergmann. Current
status of the Varioscope AR, a head-mounted operating microscope for computer-aided surgery 20-29. [Crossref]
1623. V. Ferrari, T. Tuytelaars, L. Van Gool. Markerless augmented reality with a real-time affine region tracker 87-96. [Crossref]
1624. B. Jiang, U. Neumann. Extendible tracking by line auto-calibration 97-103. [Crossref]
1625. A. State, J. Ackerman, G. Hirota, J. Lee, H. Fuchs. Dynamic virtual convergence for video see-through head-mounted
displays: maintaining maximum stereo overlap throughout a close-range work space 137-146. [Crossref]
1626. E. McGarrity, Y. Genc, M. Tuceryan, C. Owen, N. Navab. A new system for online quantitative evaluation of optical see-
through augmentation 157-166. [Crossref]
1627. R. Sharma, J. Molineros, V. Raghavan. Interactive evaluation of assembly sequences with mixed (real and virtual)
prototyping 287-292. [Crossref]
1628. S. Prince, A.D. Cheok, F. Farbiz, T. Williamson, N. Johnson, M. Billinghurst, H. Kato. 3D live: real time captured
content for mixed reality 7-317. [Crossref]
1629. Jong Weon Lee, Suya You, U. Neumann. Tracking with omni-directional vision for outdoor AR systems 47-56. [Crossref]
1630. G. Baratoff, A. Neubeck, H. Regenbrecht. Interactive multi-marker calibration for augmented reality applications 107-116.
[Crossref]
1631. O. Bimber, B. Frohlich. Occlusion shadows: using projected light to generate realistic occlusion effects for view-dependent
optical see-through displays 186-319. [Crossref]
1632. M. Haringer, H.T. Regenbrecht. A pragmatic approach to augmented reality authoring 237-245. [Crossref]
1633. P. Tschirner, B. Hillers, A. Graser. A concept for the application of augmented reality in manual gas metal arc welding
257-258. [Crossref]
1634. S. Noelle. Stereo augmentation of simulation results on a projection wall by combining two basic ARVIKA systems
271-322. [Crossref]
1635. A.I. Comport, E. Marchand, F. Chaumette. A real-time tracker for markerless augmented reality 36-45. [Crossref]
1636. Y. Baillot, S.J. Julier, D. Brown, M.A. Livingston. A tracker alignment framework for augmented reality 142-150.
[Crossref]
1637. A. Tang, Ji Zhou, C. Owen. Evaluation of calibration procedures for optical see-through head-mounted displays 161-168.
[Crossref]
1638. H. Kim, Seung-jun Yang, Kwanghoon Sohn. 3D reconstruction of stereo images for interaction between real and virtual
worlds 169-176. [Crossref]
1639. S. Zokai, J. Esteve, Y. Genc, N. Navab. Multiview paraperspective projection model for diminished reality 217-226.
[Crossref]
1640. Yong Liu, M. Storring, T.B. Moeslund, C.B. Madsen, E. Granum. Computer vision based head tracking from re-
configurable 2D markers for AR 264-267. [Crossref]
1641. R. Tenmoku, M. Kanbara, N. Yokoya. A wearable augmented reality system for navigation using positioning infrastructures
and a pedometer 344-345. [Crossref]
1642. M. Inami, N. Kawakami, S. Tachi. Optical camouflage using retro-reflective projection technology 348-349. [Crossref]
1643. N. Reijers, R. Cunningham, R. Meier, B. Hughes, G. Gaertner, V. Cahill. Using group communication to support mobile
augmented reality applications 297-306. [Crossref]
1644. S. Kakez, V. Conan, P. Bisson. Virtually documented environments 158-160. [Crossref]
1645. G. Kortuem, Z. Segall, M. Bauer. Context-aware, adaptive wearable computers as remote interfaces to 'intelligent'
environments 58-65. [Crossref]
1646. Le-Te Cheng, J. Robinson. Dealing with speed and robustness issues for video-based registration on a wearable computing
platform 84-91. [Crossref]
1647. M. Kourogi, T. Kurata, K. Sakaue. A panorama-based method of personal positioning and orientation and its real-time
applications for wearable computers 107-114. [Crossref]
1648. A.C. Boud, D.J. Haniff, C. Baber, S.J. Steiner. Virtual reality and augmented reality as a training tool for assembly tasks
32-36. [Crossref]
1649. T. Auer, A. Pinz. Building a hybrid tracking system: integration of optical and magnetic tracking 13-22. [Crossref]
1650. A. Butz, T. Hollerer, S. Feiner, B. MacIntyre, C. Beshers. Enveloping users and computers in a collaborative 3D augmented
reality 35-44. [Crossref]
1651. W. Piekarski, B. Gunther, B. Thomas. Integrating virtual and augmented realities in an outdoor application 45-54.
[Crossref]
1652. E. McGarrity, M. Tuceryan. A method for calibrating see-through head-mounted displays for AR 75-84. [Crossref]
1653. N. Navab, B. Bascle, M. Appel, E. Cubillo. Scene augmentation via the fusion of industrial drawings and uncalibrated
images with a view to marker-less calibration 125-133. [Crossref]
1654. S.K. Feiner. The importance of being mobile: some social consequences of wearable augmented reality systems 145-148.
[Crossref]
1655. W. Piekarski, B. Thomas, D. Hepworth, B. Gunther, V. Demczuk. An architecture for outdoor wearable computers to
support augmented reality and multimedia applications 70-73. [Crossref]
1656. M.M. Mitschke, N. Navab. Optimal configuration for dynamic calibration of projection geometry of X-ray C-arm systems
204-209. [Crossref]
1657. J. Vallino, C. Brown. Haptics in augmented reality 195-200. [Crossref]
1658. M. Kanbara, T. Okuma, H. Takemura, N. Yokoya. Real-time composition of stereo images for video see-through
augmented reality 213-219. [Crossref]
1659. R. Behringer, S. Chen, V. Sundareswaran, K. Wang, M. Vassiliou. A novel interface for device diagnostics using speech
recognition, augmented reality visualization, and 3D audio auralization 427-432. [Crossref]
1660. M. Terashima, S. Sakane. A human-robot interface using an extended digital desk 2874-2880. [Crossref]
1661. Y. Yokokohji, Y. Sugawara, T. Yoshikawa. Accurate image overlay on head-mounted displays using vision and
accelerometers 3243-3248. [Crossref]
1662. S. Sato, S. Sakane. A human-robot interface using an interactive hand pointer that projects a mark in the real work space
589-595. [Crossref]
1663. R. Kikuuwe, T. Yoshikawa. Haptic display device with fingertip presser for motion/force teaching to human 868-873.
[Crossref]
1664. B.G. Brooks, G.T. McKee. The Visual Acts model for automated camera placement during teleoperation 1019-1024.
[Crossref]
1665. M. Yamashita, S. Sakane. Adaptive annotation using a human-robot interface system PARTNER 2661-2667. [Crossref]
1666. A. Casals, J. Fernandez, J. Amat. Augmented reality to assist teleoperation working with reduced visual conditions 235-240.
[Crossref]
1667. S. Kousidou, K.M. Sgouros. Supporting the participation of autonomous mobile robots as players in multimedia
performances 219-224. [Crossref]
1668. Y. Sakane, M. Tsukamoto, S. Nishio. The extended desktop system for real world computing using camera images 195-204.
[Crossref]
1669. C.H.Q. Forster, C.L. Tozzi. An architecture based on constraints for augmented shared workspaces 328-335. [Crossref]
1670. Haedong Kim, Juwan Kim, Sanggyu Park. A bird's-eye view system using augmented reality 126-131. [Crossref]
1671. S. Balcisoy, M. Kallmann, R. Torre, P. Fua, D. Thalmann. Interaction techniques with virtual humans in mixed
environments VI_2_1-VI_2_6. [Crossref]
1672. R. Behringer. Registration for outdoor augmented reality applications using computer vision techniques and hybrid sensors
244-251. [Crossref]
1673. R. Azuma, B. Hoff, H. Neely, R. Sarfaty. A motion-stabilized outdoor augmented reality system 252-259. [Crossref]
1674. Suya You, U. Neumann, R. Azuma. Hybrid inertial and vision tracking for augmented reality registration 260-267.
[Crossref]
1675. Y. Yokokohji, Y. Sugawara, T. Yoshikawa. Accurate image overlay on video see-through HMDs using vision and
accelerometers 247-254. [Crossref]
1676. M. Kanbara, T. Okuma, H. Takemura, N. Yokoya. A stereoscopic video see-through augmented reality system based on
real-time vision-based registration 255-262. [Crossref]
1677. T. Kobayashi, G. Inoue, Y. Ohta, Long Quan. A unified linear algorithm for a novel view synthesis and camera pose
estimation in mixed reality 263-270. [Crossref]
1678. S. You, U. Neumann. Fusion of vision and gyro tracking for robust augmented reality registration 71-78. [Crossref]
1679. R.S. Allison, L.R. Harris, M. Jenkin, U. Jasiobedzka, J.E. Zacher. Tolerance of temporal delay in virtual environments
247-254. [Crossref]
1680. T. Nojima, D. Sekiguchi, M. Inami, S. Tachi. The SmartTool: a system for augmented reality of haptics 67-72. [Crossref]
1681. W. Chinthammit, E.J. Seibel, T.A. Furness. Unique shared-aperture display with head or target tracking 235-242.
[Crossref]
1682. T. Okuma, T. Kurata, K. Sakaue. VizWear-3D: a wearable 3-D annotation system based on 3-D object tracking using
a condensation algorithm 295-296. [Crossref]
1683. U. Neumann, Suya You, Jinhui Hu, Bolan Jiang, JongWeon Lee. Augmented virtual environments (AVE): dynamic fusion
of imagery and 3D models 61-67. [Crossref]
1684. D. Cobzas, M. Jagersand, K. Yerex. Editing real world scenes: augmented reality with image-based rendering 291-292.
[Crossref]
1685. Ungyeon Yang, G. Jounghyun Kim. Increasing the effective egocentric field of view with proprioceptive and tactile feedback
27-34. [Crossref]
1686. J. Fischer, D. Bartz, W. Strasser. Stylized augmented reality for improved immersion 195-325. [Crossref]
1687. T. Ohshima, K. Satoh, H. Yamamoto, H. Tamura. AR/sup 2/Hockey: a case study of collaborative augmented reality
268-275. [Crossref]
1688. M. Kanbara, N. Yokoya, H. Takemura. A stereo vision-based augmented reality system with marker and natural feature
tracking 455-462. [Crossref]
1689. Xiang Zhang, N. Navab. Tracking and pose estimation for computer assisted localization in industrial environments
214-221. [Crossref]
1690. Tao Pin, Ye Zhen. Real time tracking in robot teleoperation system 1305-1308. [Crossref]
1691. . Back Matter . [Crossref]
1692. . Back Matter . [Crossref]
1693. T. Okuma, T. Kurata, K. Sakaue. A natural feature-based 3d object tracking method for wearable augmented reality
451-456. [Crossref]
1694. E. Tokunaga, A. Van Der Zee, M. Kurahashi, M. Nemoto, T. Nakajima. Object-oriented middleware infrastructure for
distributed augmented reality 156-163. [Crossref]
1695. Y. Kishino, M. Tsukamoto, Y. Sakane, S. Nishio. Realizing a visual marker using LEDs for wearable computing
environment 314-319. [Crossref]
1696. J. Tardif, S. Roy, M. Trudeau. Multi-projectors for arbitrary surfaces without explicit calibration nor reconstruction
217-224. [Crossref]
1697. D. Hallaway, T. Hollerer, S. Feiner. Coarse, inexpensive, infrared tracking for wearable computing 69-78. [Crossref]
1698. R. Tenmoku, M. Kanbara, N. Yokoya. A wearable augmented reality system using positioning infrastructures and a
pedometer 110-117. [Crossref]
1699. B. Jiang, U. Neumann, Suya You. A robust hybrid tracking system for outdoor augmented reality 3-275. [Crossref]
1700. C. Scharver, R. Evenhouse, A. Johnson, J. Leigh. Pre-surgical cranial implant design using the PARIS/spl trade/ prototype
199-291. [Crossref]
1701. H. Kato, K. Tachibana, M. Billinghurst, M. Grafe. A registration method based on texture tracking using ARToolKit
77-85. [Crossref]
1702. Ozan Karaca, Kadir Demir, S. Ayhan Caliskan. Virtual, Augmented and Mobile Learning in Health Education 168-195.
[Crossref]
1703. Azizul Hassan, Roya Rahimi. Consuming “Innovation” in Tourism 215-232. [Crossref]
1704. Gerardo Reyes Ruiz, Marisol Hernández Hernández, Samuel Olmos Peña. Augmented Reality as a Search System in
Libraries 25-57. [Crossref]
1705. Aubrey Statti, Kelly M. Torres. Second or Foreign Language Learning With Augmented Reality 193-221. [Crossref]
1706. Cristina Portalés, Jesús Gimeno, Sergio Casas, Ricardo Olanda, Francisco Giner Martínez. Interacting With Augmented
Reality Mirrors 18-46. [Crossref]
1707. Utku Köse. An Augmented-Reality-Based Intelligent Mobile Application for Open Computer Education 324-344.
[Crossref]
1708. Jorge Joo Nagata, José Rafael García-Bermejo Giner, Fernando Martínez-Abad. Virtual Territorial Heritage in Education
through mLearning Resources 345-377. [Crossref]
1709. Luís Pádua, Telmo Adão, David Narciso, António Cunha, Luís Magalhães, Emanuel Peres. Towards Modern Cost-
Effective and Lightweight Augmented Reality Setups 396-423. [Crossref]
1710. Aras Bozkurt. Augmented Reality With Mobile and Ubiquitous Learning 603-617. [Crossref]
1711. Srinivasa K. G., Satvik Jagannath, Aakash Nidhi. Know Your World Better 777-793. [Crossref]
1712. Eric G. Poitras, Jason M. Harley, Timothy Compeau, Kevin Kee, Susanne P. Lajoie. Augmented Reality in Informal
Learning Settings 804-825. [Crossref]
1713. Tuğçe Ozansoy Çadırcı, Şirin Gizem Köse. Augmented Reality as a Tool to Enhance the Experiential Value of Online
Shopping 850-874. [Crossref]
1714. Sebastiano Nucera, Gennaro Tartarisco, Aldo Epasto, Donatello Smeriglio, Alessandro Mazzeo, Giovanni Pioggia,
Alessandra Anastasi. Ubiquitous, Wearable, Mobile 996-1017. [Crossref]
1715. Nilgun Tosun. Augmented Reality Implementations, Requirements, and Limitations in the Flipped-Learning Approach
1018-1036. [Crossref]
1716. Belgin Boz Yuksekdag. The Importance of Mobile Augmented Reality in Online Nursing Education 1107-1121. [Crossref]
1717. Miraç Banu Gundogan. In Search for a “Good Fit” Between Augmented Reality and Mobile Learning Ecosystem
1359-1376. [Crossref]
1718. Neda Shabani, Azizul Hassan. Augmented Reality for Tourism Service Promotion in Iran as an Emerging Market
1808-1818. [Crossref]
1719. Prabha Selvaraj, Sumathi Doraikannan, Anantha Raman Rathinam, Balachandrudu K. E.. Augmented Reality and
Experiences 66-93. [Crossref]
1720. Evrim Çeltek. Advantages of Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, QR Code, Near Field Communication, Geo-Tagging,
Geo-Fencing, and Geo-Targeting for Marketing Tourism 94-113. [Crossref]
1721. Evrim Çeltek. Smart Technologies 116-132. [Crossref]
1722. Wen-Chun Hsu, Ju-Ling Shih. Applying Augmented Reality to a Mobile-Assisted Learning System for Martial Arts
Using Kinect Motion Capture 1000-1016. [Crossref]
1723. Muzaffer Özdemir. Educational Augmented Reality (AR) Applications and Development Process 26-53. [Crossref]
1724. Miraç Banu Gundogan. In Search for a “Good Fit” Between Augmented Reality and Mobile Learning Ecosystem 135-153.
[Crossref]
1725. Utku Köse. An Augmented-Reality-Based Intelligent Mobile Application for Open Computer Education 154-174.
[Crossref]
1726. Nilgun Tosun. Augmented Reality Implementations, Requirements, and Limitations in the Flipped-Learning Approach
262-280. [Crossref]
1727. Belgin Boz Yuksekdag. The Importance of Mobile Augmented Reality in Online Nursing Education 291-305. [Crossref]
1728. Zeenat S. AlKassim, Nader Mohamed. Sixth Sense Technology 188-215. [Crossref]
1729. Cristina Portalés, Jesús Gimeno, Sergio Casas, Ricardo Olanda, Francisco Giner Martínez. Interacting with Augmented
Reality Mirrors 216-244. [Crossref]
1730. Eric G. Poitras, Jason M. Harley, Timothy Compeau, Kevin Kee, Susanne P. Lajoie. Augmented Reality in Informal
Learning Settings 272-293. [Crossref]
1731. Rui Miguel Pascoal, Sérgio Luís Guerreiro. Information Overload in Augmented Reality 271-301. [Crossref]
1732. Belgin Boz Yuksekdag. The Importance of Mobile Augmented Reality in Online Nursing Education 111-125. [Crossref]
1733. Sebastiano Nucera, Gennaro Tartarisco, Aldo Epasto, Donatello Smeriglio, Alessandro Mazzeo, Giovanni Pioggia,
Alessandra Anastasi. Ubiquitous, Wearable, Mobile 286-307. [Crossref]
1734. Nhu Le, Hanh Dinh. Augmented Reality 291-309. [Crossref]
1735. Aydin Tabrizi, Paola Sanguinetti. Literature Review of Augmented Reality Application in the Architecture, Engineering,
and Construction Industry With Relation to Building Information 983-993. [Crossref]
1736. Ilana de Almeida Souza Concilio, Beatriz de Almeida Pacheco, Ana Grasielle Dionísio Corrêa. The Use of Augmented
Reality as a Teaching Tool 405-449. [Crossref]
1737. Robson R. Lemos, Cristiane Meneghelli Rudolph, Arthur V. Batista, Karolini R. Conceição, Poliana F. Pereira, Bruna S.
Bueno, Patricia J. Fiuza, Samira S. Mansur. Design of a Web3D Serious Game for Human Anatomy Education 586-611.
[Crossref]
1738. Paula Cristina Remoaldo, Vitor P. Ribeiro, Hélder Silva Lopes, Sara Catarina Gomes Silva. Geographic Information Systems
3460-3472. [Crossref]
1739. Sergio Casas, Cristina Portalés, Lucía Vera, José Vicente Riera. Virtual and Augmented Reality Mirrors for Mental Health
Treatment 95-117. [Crossref]
1740. Sinan Turnacioglu, Joseph P McCleery, Julia Parish-Morris, Vibha Sazawal, Rita Solorzano. The State of Virtual and
Augmented Reality Therapy for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) 118-140. [Crossref]
1741. Nelson Ribeiro Jorge, Lina Morgado, Pedro J. S. Gaspar. E-Learning and Augmented Reality (AR) for Chronic Wound
Assessment 241-261. [Crossref]
1742. Marco Savastano, Eleonora Pantano, Saverino Verteramo. Ubiquitous Computing, Contactless Points, and Distributed
Stores 7805-7813. [Crossref]
1743. Tuğçe Ozansoy Çadırcı, Şirin Gizem Köse. Augmented Reality as a Tool to Enhance the Experiential Value of Online
Shopping 280-304. [Crossref]
1744. Doo Hun Lim, Soo Jeoung Han, Jihye Oh, Chang Sung Jang. Application of Virtual and Augmented Reality for Training
and Mentoring of Higher Education Instructors 325-344. [Crossref]
1745. Marco Savastano, Eleonora Pantano, Saverino Verteramo. Ubiquitous Computing, Contactless Points, and Distributed
Stores 1211-1221. [Crossref]
1746. Evrim Celtek. Augmented Reality Advertisements in Tourism Marketing 125-146. [Crossref]
1747. Giuliana Guazzaroni. Street Poetry in Augmented Reality 150-170. [Crossref]
1748. Evrim Çeltek. Smart Technologies 876-892. [Crossref]
1749. Evrim Çeltek. Augmented Reality Advertisements in Tourism Marketing 1082-1102. [Crossref]
1750. José Duarte Cardoso Gomes, Mauro Jorge Guerreiro Figueiredo, Lúcia da Graça Cruz Domingues Amante, Cristina Maria
Cardoso Gomes. Augmented Reality in Informal Learning Environments 281-305. [Crossref]
1751. Jorge Joo Nagata, José Rafael García-Bermejo Giner, Fernando Martínez-Abad. Virtual Territorial Heritage in Education
through mLearning Resources 162-195. [Crossref]
1752. E. Tokunaga, A. Van Der Zee Makoto, K. Masahiro Nemoto, T. Nakajima. A middleware infrastracture for building
mixed reality applications in ubiquitous computing environments 382-391. [Crossref]
1753. Zhencheng Hu, K. Uchimura. Real-time data fusion on tracking camera pose for direct visual guidance 842-847. [Crossref]
1754. B. Schwald, H. Seibert, M. Schnaider. Composing 6 DOF tracking systems for VR/AR 411-418. [Crossref]
1755. I. Macia, A. Susperregui, E. Carrasco, M.T. Linaza, L. Mihalic, A. Stork. Application of virtual showcase technologies
in real scenarios: the case of San Telmo museum 428-435. [Crossref]
1756. F. Liarokapis, M. White, P. Lister. Augmented reality interface toolkit 761-767. [Crossref]
1757. A. Malkawi, R. Srinivasan, B. Jackson, Yun Yi, Kin Chan, S. Angelov. Interactive, immersive visualization for indoor
environments: use of augmented reality, human-computer interaction and building simulation 833-838. [Crossref]
1758. M. Maeda, T. Ogawa, K. Kiyokawa, H. Takemura. Tracking of User Position and Orientation by Stereo Measurement of
Infrared Markers and Orientation Sensing 77-84. [Crossref]
1759. Ian Yen-Hung Chen, Bruce MacDonald, Burkhard Wünsche. Markerless Augmented Reality for Robotic Helicoptor
Applications 125-138. [Crossref]
1760. Seamus Hickey, Petri Pulli. Developing a User Centric MultiSphere Model for Mobile Users Using a Visual Cell Platform
263-270. [Crossref]
1761. C.W. Nielsen, B. Ricks, D. Bruernmer, D. Few, M. Walton, M.A. Goodrich. Snapshots for semantic maps 2853-2858.
[Crossref]
1762. M. Quigley, M.A. Goodrich, R.W. Beard. Semi-autonomous human-UAV interfaces for fixed-wing mini-UAVs
2457-2462. [Crossref]
1763. M. Traskback. Toward a Usable Mixed Reality Authoring Tool 160-162. [Crossref]
1764. Zhigang Yan, Kui Yuan. An orientation tracking algorithm valid in a hemisphere space based on the gravity field and the
earth magnetic field 236-239. [Crossref]
1765. Zhengpeng Yuan, Zhenbang Gong, Jiaqi Wu, Y. Kanou. A registration method of AR system applicable to outdoor
environment 901-904. [Crossref]
1766. Karl-Friedrich Kraiss. Assisted Man-Machine Interaction 369-397. [Crossref]
1767. R. Bischoff, A. Kazi. Perspectives on augmented reality based human-robot interaction with industrial robots 3226-3231.
[Crossref]
1768. Thomas Lange, Michael Hünerbein, Sebastian Eulenstein, Sigfried Beller, Peter Michael Schlag. Development of
Navigation Systems for Image-Guided Laparoscopic Tumor Resections in Liver Surgery 13-36. [Crossref]
1769. . Virtuelle Produktentstehung Y14-Y24. [Crossref]
1770. Dieter Schmalstieg, Gerhard Reitmayr. Augmented Reality as a Medium for Cartography 267-281. [Crossref]
1771. Dieter Schmalstieg, Gerhard Reitmayr. The World as a User Interface: Augmented Reality for Ubiquitous Computing
369-391. [Crossref]
1772. S. Mottura, L. Greci, E. Travaini, G. Viganò, M. Sacco. MagicMirror & FootGlove: A New System for the Customized
Shoe Try-on 441-450. [Crossref]
1773. . Erstellung virtueller und physischer Prototypen 329-489. [Crossref]
1774. Albrecht Schmidt. Eingebettete Interaktion — Symbiose von Mensch und Information 77-101. [Crossref]
1775. Michael Wittkämper, Anne-Kathrin Braun, Iris Herbst, Jan Herling. A Distributed System for Augmented Reality
Experiences in Science Centers and Museums 936-946. [Crossref]
1776. Yasuyoshi Yokokohji, Yoshihiko Sugawara, Junji Kinoshita, Tsuneo Yoshikawa. Mechano-Media that Transmit Kinesthetic
Knowledge from a Human to Other Humans 499-512. [Crossref]
1777. Matthias Harders, Gerald Bianchi, Benjamin Knoerlein. Multimodal Augmented Reality in Medicine 652-658. [Crossref]
1778. Volker Wiendl, Klaus Dorfmüller-Ulhaas, Nicolas Schulz, Elisabeth André. Integrating a Virtual Agent into the Real
World: The Virtual Anatomy Assistant Ritchie 211-224. [Crossref]
1779. R. Anderl, H. Grabowski. Elektronische Datenverarbeitung Y1-Y29. [Crossref]
1780. Fritz Küderli. Computer Aided Styling und die virtuelle Realität im Außen- und Innendesign 302-314. [Crossref]
1781. Clara Boj, Diego Díaz. The Hybrid City: Augmented Reality for Interactive Artworks in the Public Space 141-161.
[Crossref]
1782. Sebastian Fehlberg, Sebastian Eulenstein, Thomas Lange, Dimosthenis Andreou, Per-Ulf Tunn. Computer-Assisted
Pelvic Tumor Resection: Fields of Application, Limits, and Perspectives 169-182. [Crossref]
1783. Kye Bokyung. Investigation on the Relationships among Media Characteristics, Presence, Flow, and Learning Effects in
Augmented Reality Based Learning 21-37. [Crossref]
1784. B. Nini, M.C. Batouche. Virtual object manipulation in collaborative augmented reality environment 1204-1208. [Crossref]
1785. B. Nini, M.C. Batouche. Virtual object manipulation in collaborative augmented reality environment 1607-1611. [Crossref]
1786. B. Fergani, M.C. Batouche, B. Boufama. Robust registration of virtual objects for industrial applications 1040-1045.
[Crossref]
1787. J. Knispel. The XYZ virtual workspace 241-244. [Crossref]
1788. A. Osaki, Y. Miwa. Aerial drawing interface for supporting an actual communication in face-to-face situation 134-139.
[Crossref]
1789. S. Wesugi, Y. Miwa. Co-actuated table creating a sense of co-presence in shared virtual environments 606-611. [Crossref]
1790. C. Scharver, J. Patton, R. Kenyon, E. Kersten. Comparing Adaptation of Constrained and Unconstrained Movements in
Three Dimensions 434-439. [Crossref]