Name: Rhywen Paul Gabriel F.

Gille
Course/Year: BSBA-FM2
PERF 01d

For me, No. In the said situation, Jonathan was dreaming. According to the
chapter 2 of Ethics entitled "The morality of human acts and moral
accountability", his action and movement are essentially sensuous in nature, and
he did them without thought or free will. He was only dreaming and absolutely
unconscious that time. Therefore, Jonathan is neither accountable nor liable for
what actions he did. Sleeping and dreaming, feeling of fear, rage and anger and
others are some examples on how we can able to determine if the actions of
someone is an acts of human. It was stated in the book that such certain
behaviors occur spontaneously in the person during impulsive, unconscious, and
instinctual periods, such as dreaming, which Jonathan experiences. If someone is
completely oblivious or fully unaware of what he is doing, it is termed as an acts
of man. Jonathan's action is just an action that occurs naturally in a person. He did
it without hesitation, thought, or agreement. He just did it on the spur of the
moment.