Professional Documents
Culture Documents
in
www.tntextbooks.in
Unit - 6
Early Revolts
against British Rule
in Tamil Nadu
Learning Objectives
To acquaint ourselves with
Palayakkarar system and the revolts of Palayakkarars against the
British
Velunachiyar, Puli Thevar, Kattabomman and Marudhu Brothers in
the anti-British uprisings
Vellore Revolt as a response to British pacification of south India
Vellore Fort
Early Revolts against British Rule in Tamil Nadu 8
SUMMARY
Prominent Palayakkarars of Tamil country and their resistance to the rule of East India Company
are discussed.
The wars waged by Puli Thevar, Velunachiyar, Veerapandya Kattabomman, followed by Marudhu
brothers of Sivagangai and Dheeran Chinnamalai against the British are elaborated.
The reasons for the Vellore Revolt and the ruthless manner in which it was suppressed by Gillespie
are detailed.
EXERCISE
VI. A
nswer the questions given REFERENCE BOOKS
under each caption
1. Burton Stein, Peasant State and Society in
1. Velunachiyar Medieval South India, New Delhi:Oxford
a) Who was the military chief of University Press, 1980.
Velunachiyar?
2. P.M. Lalitha, Palayakararss as Feudatories
b) What were the martial arts in which
Under the Nayaks of Madurai, Chennai:
she was trained?
Creative Enterprises, 2015.
c) Whom did she marry?
d) What was the name of her daughter? 3. K. Rajayyan, South Indian Rebellion,
1800–1801, Madurai, Ratna Publication,
2. Dheeran Chinnamalai
2000 (Reprint).
a) When was Dheeran Chinnamalai born?
b) How did he earn the title “Chinnamalai”? 4. K.A. Manikumar, Vellore Revolt 1806
c) Name the Diwan of Tipu Sultan? (Chennai: Allied Publishers, 2007).
d) Why and where was he hanged to
death?
British declared the fourth Anglo-Mysore judicial powers and dispensed justice over
war in 1799. General David Baird stormed civil and criminal cases.
Srirangapatnam. Tipu’s offer of peace was
rejected and in the eventual battle Tipu The origin of the Palayakkarar (poligari)
was wounded and soon after shot dead by system dates back to the 1530s. It is
a European Soldier. believed that this system was practiced
The elimination of Tipu and the earlier in Kakatiya kingdom of Warangal.
restoration of the old Wodeyar dynasty The literal meaning of Palayakkarar is the
to the Mysore kingdom marked the real holder of a camp as well as the holder of
beginning of Company rule in south India. an estate on military tenure. Prior to the
The sons of the slain Tipu were interned enforcement of this system Servaikarars
first at Vellore, and later, after the Vellore and Talayaris collected fees for police
Revolt of 1806, shifted to Calcutta. Thus work. After the creation of palayams, the
ended the valiant fight of Mysore Sultans Servaikarars turned Palayakkarars and
against the British subordinated Talayaris to their authority.
Consequently the unity of palyakkarars was killed by the Nawab’s forces, Velu
began to break up as French support was Nachiyar escaped with her daughter and
not forthcoming. Travancore, Seithur, lived under the protection of Haider
Uthumalai and Surandai switched their Ali at Virupachi near Dindigul for eight
loyalty. Yusuf Khan, who was negotiating years. During this period she organized
with the palayakkarars without informing an army and succeeded in securing an
the Company administration, was charged alliance with Gopala Nayaker and Haider
with treachery and hanged in 1764. Ali. In 1780 Rani Velu Nachiyar fought
Puli Thevar, who had taken the British with military assistance from
asylum elsewhere after the forts were Gopala Nayaker and Haider Ali and won
taken over by Yusuf Khan, returned and the battle.
began to organize against the British.
Captain Campbell who was sent this time
by the British, laid siege and captured Velu Nachiyar employed her intelligence
Nerkattumseval in 1767. Nothing is gathering agents to discover where the
definitely known about the last days of British stored their ammunition. One of
Puli Thevar. her followers Kuyili, doused herself in
oil, set herself alight, and walked into the
storehouse. She also employed another
Velu Nachiyar
agent, her adopted daughter Udaiyaal,
to detonate a British arsenal, blowing
herself up along with the barracks. Velu
Nachiyar formed a woman’s army.
Kattabomman’s fort, 500 feet long Marudu Brothers and the South
and 300 feet broad, was constructed Indian Rebellion of 1801
entirely of mud. The Company forces
cut off the communications of the fort.
Kattabomman’s forces fought gallantly
and successive attacks were repulsed.
Colonel Welsh recorded in his memoirs
the gallantry of Kattabomman's soldiers.
The English ordered for the arrival of more
troops. On 16 September reinforcements
arrived from Palayamkottai. As the broken
walls appeared vulnerable, the garrison
evacuated and reached Kadalgudi. In
a clash at Kalarpatti, Kattabomman’s Marudu Brothers
minister Sivasubramonia Pillai was taken
prisoner. The British forces followed By the treaty of 1772 the Arcot Nawab
up their victory with the reduction of had authorized the Company to collect
Nagalapuram and other strongholds the Stalam Kaval and Desakaval. This
of the defiant chiefs to submission. On affected the Kaval chiefs in both the
the appearance of the army the western Palayakkarar and non-palaykkarar
Palayakkarars too surrendered. territories. The aggrieved kavalkarars and
their chiefs had joined the palayakkarars
Vijaya Ragunatha Tondaiman, Raja in their fight against the Nawab and the
of Pudukottai, captured Kattabomman Company. In Sivagangai, Vella Marudu
from the jungles of Kalapore and handed and Chinna Marudu, who had taken over
him over to the enemy. Upon the fall of the administration from Periya Udaya
the Palayakkarar into the hands of the Tevar, who died in battle against the
enemy, his followers fled to Sivaganga Nawab’s forces, expelled the forces of the
and from there to the hills of Dindigul for Nawab and proclaimed Vellachi, daughter
taking service with Marudu Pandiyan and of Periya Udaya Tevar and Velu Nachiyar,
Gopala Nayak. as the queen of Sivagangai. The Marudus
assumed the charge of the ministers. The
Bannerman brought the prisoners
temple of Kalayarkoil in the heart of the
to an assembly of the Palayakkarars and
then Sivagangai forest became the rallying
after a mockery of trial sentenced them
point of the rebels. When Umathurai
to death. On 16 October Veera Pandiya
reached Kamudhi after the execution of
Kattabomman was tried before an assembly
his brother Veera Pandiya Kattabomman,
of Palayakkarars at Kayatar. Unmindful of
Chinna Marudu took him to Siruvayal, his
impending death Kattabomman admitted all
capital.
the charges levelled against him. He declared
that he did send his armed men against Now, Nawab Mohammad Ali
Sivagiri and that he did fight the British released Muthuramalinga Thevar from
troops in the battle at Panchalamkurichi. On jail and enthroned him as the Setupati
17 October Kattabomman was hanged to of Ramanathapuram. But the rebels
death at a conspicuous spot near the old fort proclaimed Muthu Karuppa Thevar as
of Kayatar. Kattabomman’s heroic exploits their ruler. They occupied the southern
were the subject of many folk ballads which and northern regions of the kingdom. The
kept his memory alive among the people. soldiers made their entry into Madurai
Early Resistance to British Rule 135
www.tntextbooks.in
too. In July Umathurai led his followers the able commanders of the British army
to Palayanad in Madurai and captured won the day. Following Umathurai’s arrest
it. In 1801 both the Sivagangai and Marudu brothers were captured from
Ramanathapuram forces joined together the Singampunary hills, and Shevathiah
under the command of Shevatha Thambi, from Batlagundu and Doraiswamy, the
the son of Chinna Marudu, and marched son of Vellai Marudu from a village
along the coast towards Thanjavur. near Madurai. Chinna Marudu and his
Thereupon the distressed peasants in brother Vellai Marudu were executed at
Thanjavur also joined the force of Shevatha the fort of Tiruppatthur on 24 October
Thambi. Captain William Blackburne, the 1801. Umathurai and Shevathiah, with
resident of Thanjaur collected a force and several of their followers, were taken to
defeated Shevatha Thambi near Mangudi. Panchalamkurichi and beheaded on 16
Serfoji, the raja of Thanjavur stood firmly November 1801. Seventy three rebels were
by the British. Yet the fighters could elude banished to Penang in Malaya in April
the pursuit of the British troops by rapid 1802.
movements, while laying the entire region
waste.
Theeran Chinnamalai
trained by the French and Tipu. In his bid English. Thus the Vellore Fort became
to launch an attack on the Company’s fort the meeting ground of the rebel forces of
in Coimbatore (1800), Chinnamalai tried south India. The sepoys and the migrants
taking the help of the Marudu brothers to Vellore held frequent deliberations,
from Sivagangai. He also forged alliances attended by the representatives of the
with Gopal Nayak of Virupatchi; Appachi sons of Tipu.
Gounder of Paramathi Velur; Joni Jon
Kahan of Attur Salem; Kumaral Vellai of Immediate Cause
Perundurai and Varanavasi of Erode in
In the meantime, the English enforced
fighting the Company.
certain innovations in the administration
Chinnamalai’s plans did not of the sepoy establishments. They
succeed as the Company stopped the prohibited all markings on the forehead
reinforcements from the Marudu brothers. which were intended to denote caste
Also, Chinnamalai changed his plan and and religious, and directed the sepoys
attacked the fort a day earlier. This led to to cut their moustaches to a set pattern.
the Company army executing 49 people. Added to these, Adjutant General Agnew
However, Chinnamalai escaped. Between designed and introduced under his direct
1800 and July 31, 1805 when he was supervision a new model turban for the
hanged, Chinnamalai continued to fight sepoys.
against the Company. Three of his battles
The most obnoxious innovation
are important: the 1801 battle on Cauvery
in the new turban, from the Indian point
banks, the 1802 battle in Odanilai and the
of view, was the leather cockade. The
1804 battle in Arachalur. The last and the
cockade was made of animal skin. Pig
final one was in 1805. During the final
skin was anathema to Muslims, while
battle, Chinnamalai was betrayed by his
upper caste Hindus shunned anything to
cook Chinnamalai and was hanged in
do with the cow’s hide. To make matters
Sivagiri fort.
worse the front part of the uniform had
been converted into a cross.
Vellore Revolt (1806) The order regarding whiskers,
Vellore Revolt 1806 was the culmination caste marks and earrings, which infringed
of the attempts of the descendents of the the religious customs of both Hindu and
dethroned kings and chieftains in south Muslim soldiers, was justified on the
India to throw of the yoke of the British grounds that, although they had not been
rule. After the suppression of revolt of prohibited previously by any formal order,
Marudu brothers, they made Vellore the it had never been the practice in any well-
centre of their activity. The organizers of regulated corps for the men to appear with
an Anti-British Confederacy continued them on parade.
their secret moves, as a result of which The first incident occurred in
no fewer than 3,000 loyalists of Mysore May 1806. The men in the 2nd battalion
sultans had settled either in the town of of the 4th regiment at Vellore refused to
Vellore or in its vicinity. The garrison of wear the new turban. When the matter
Vellore itself consisted of many aggrieved was reported to the Governor by Col.
persons, who had been reduced to dire Fancourt, commandant of the garrison,
straits as a sequel to loss of positions or he ordered a band of the 19th Dragoons
whose properties had been confiscated (Cavalry) to escort the rebels, against
or whose relatives were slain by the whom charges had been framed, to the
Early Resistance to British Rule 137
www.tntextbooks.in
who was on duty outside the Fort, on the 19th dragoons under the direction of
hearing of the revolt tried to enter the Lieutenant Blakiston. The troops entered
Fort. As he was unable to make it, he sent the place, headed by a squadron of the
off an officer, Captain Stevenson of 23rd, cavalry under Captain Skelton.
to Arcot with a letter addressed to Colonel The Gillespie’s men were met by
Gillespie, who commanded the cavalry a severe crossfire. In the ensuing battle,
cantonment there. The letter reached Colonel Gillespie himself suffered bruises.
Arcot, some 25 km away, at 6 a.m. Colonel The sepoys retreated. Hundreds escaped
Gillespie set out immediately, taking over the walls of the Fort, or threw down
with him a squadron of the 19th dragoons their arms and pleaded for mercy. Then
under Captain Young, supported by a the cavalry regiment assembled on the
strong troop of the 7th cavalry under parade ground and resolved to pursue the
Lieutenant Woodhouse. He instructed fleeing soldiers, who were exiting towards
Colonel Kennedy to follow him with the the narrow passage of escape afforded by
rest of the cavalry, leaving a detachment the sally port. A troop of dragoons and
to protect the cantonment and to keep up some native horsemen were sent round
the communication. to intercept the fleeing soldiers. All the
When Colonel Gillespie arrived at buildings in the Fort were searched,
the Vellore Fort at 9 a.m., he thought it and mutineers found in them pitilessly
prudent to await the arrival of the guns, slaughtered. Gillespie’s men wanted to
since there was continuous firing. Soon enter the building and take revenge on the
the cavalry under Kennedy came from princes, the instigators of the plot; but Lt.
Arcot. It was about 10 o’Clock. The gate Colonel Marriott resisted the attempt of
was blown open with the galloper guns of the dragoons to kill Tipu’s sons.
According to J. Blakistan, an eyewitness to Gillespie's atrocity, more than 800 bodies were
carried out of the fort. In W.J. Wilson's estimate 378 were jailed for involvement in the revolt;
516 were considered implicated but not imprisoned. Based on depositions before the Court of
Enquiry, the Court Martial awarded death punishment and banishment to select individuals,
which were carried out by the commanding officer of Vellore on 23 September 1806.
(Source: W.J. Wilson, History of the Madras Army, vol. III, 1888-89).
LESSON 10
VELLORE MUTINY
Learning Objectives
Vellore was the capital of erstwhile North Arcot district in Tamil Nadu. At
present, this district is named after its capital Vellore. It is a well fortified and
beautiful city.
Vellore Fort
With the expansion of the East India Company’s rule in India, the native
rulers and their dependents suffered. The native rulers either submitted or rebelled.
These rebellions had no clear vision or ideal but purely motivated by the territorial
interest of the native rulers and their ambition to preserve the old feudal order. The
heroism and sacrifice of individuals like Puli Thevar, Kattabomman and Marudu
Brothers had no parallel. But all these leaders never organised the common
people for a unified and meaningful cause. The ideas of nationalism, political
consciousness and organized struggle came much later.
In Vellore the native sepoys rose in revolt in 1806.This incident differs from
other previous rebellions in. The earlier rebellions were those of the native rulers.
The Vellore Mutiny was organized by the sepoys. The earlier rebellions had only a
regional interest. Every prince wanted to safeguard his own kingdom at any cost.
65
www.tntextbooks.in
But Vellore Mutiny was the result of spontaneous outflow of the feelings of the
sepoys who served under the Company. It was a protest by the sepoys against the
Company. This protest showed the future possibilities.
Causes
Several causes are attributed to the Vellore Mutiny. Indian sepoys had to
experience numerous difficulties when they went to serve in the Company’s army.
The sepoys were forced to serve under the Company since their earlier
patrons (the native chieftains) were all disappearing from the scene. The strict
discipline, practice, new weapons, new methods and uniforms were all new to the
sepoys. Anything new appears to be difficult and wrong for a man who is well-settled
in the old way of life for a long-time.
The sepoys were asked to shave the chin and to trim the moustache. The
sepoys felt that these were designed to insult them and their religious and social
traditions. There was also a popular belief that this was the beginning of a process
by which all of them would be converted to Christianity.
The English treated the Indian sepoys as their inferior. There was the racial
prejudice. This was the psychological base for the sepoy mutinies in India during the
Company’s rule.
The sepoys once served the local chieftains (either Hindu or Muslim). The
chieftains were their own kinsmen but now they served under the foreigners. They
can never forget their original loyalties.
On the eve of the Mutiny at Vellore Fettah Hyder, the first son of Tipu, tried
to form an alliance against the English and sought the help of the Marathas and the
French.
66
www.tntextbooks.in
Thus, there was the desire to revive the old Muslim rule in this region. The
sepoys were aware of the tragic end of Puli Thevar, Khan Sahib, Kattabomman,
Marudu Brothers, Tipu Sultan and others. Hence there were ill-feelings about the
British in the minds of the sepoys. All these led to the rebellion.
On July 10th in the early morning the native sepoys of the 1st and 23rd
Regiments started the revolt . Colonel Fancourt, who commanded the garrison,
was their first victim. Colonel Me Kerras of the 23rd Regiment, was shot down on the
parade-ground. Major Armstrong was the next officer to be killed during the mutiny.
About a dozen other officers were also killed.
Major Cootes who was outside the fort dashed to Ranipet, 14 miles away,
and informed Colonel Gillespie at 7 am . Col. Gillespie reached the Vellore fort at 9
A.M.
Meantime, the rebels proclaimed Futteh Hyder, Tipu’s first son, as their
new ruler and hoisted tiger-striped flag of Tipu Sultan. But the uprising was swiftly
crushed by Col. Gillespie. 800 Indian soldiers were found dead in the fort alone. Six
hundred soldiers were imprisoned in Tiruchi and Vellore. Some rebels were hung,
some shot dead. The uprising was thus brought to a bloody end. Tipu’s son was
sent to Calcutta. The commander-in-chief and the governor were recalled.
Vellore Mutiny failed. There was no proper leadership. The rebellion was
also not well organized. But it is the starting point of a new era of the resistance of
the sepoys to the British rule. The 18th century was marked by the resistance of the
local chieftains. The first six decades of 19th century was marked by the resistance of
sepoys.
K.K. Pillai rejects the thesis that Vellore Mutiny led to the 1857 revolt. V.D.
Savarkar calls the Vellore Mutiny of 1806 as the prelude to the first War of Indian
Independence in 1857. N. Sanjivi proclaims that the Tamils had taken the real
lead in the Indian freedom struggle. K. Rajayyan argues that this mutiny was a
continuation of the Marudu Brothers’ resistance movement against the colonial rule.
67
www.tntextbooks.in
Learning Outcome
MODEL QUESTIONS
I. Choose the correct answer.
1. Which among the following was one of the causes for the Vellore Mutiny?
2. ——— who was outside the fort dashed to Ranipet to seek help
IV. Find out the correct statement. One statement alone is right.
a) New army regulations were mainly responsible for the Vellore Mutiny.
SUMMARY
Consequently the unity of palyakkarars was killed by the Nawab’s forces, Velu
began to break up as French support was Nachiyar escaped with her daughter and
not forthcoming. Travancore, Seithur, lived under the protection of Haider
Uthumalai and Surandai switched their Ali at Virupachi near Dindigul for eight
loyalty. Yusuf Khan, who was negotiating years. During this period she organized
with the palayakkarars without informing an army and succeeded in securing an
the Company administration, was charged alliance with Gopala Nayaker and Haider
with treachery and hanged in 1764. Ali. In 1780 Rani Velu Nachiyar fought
Puli Thevar, who had taken the British with military assistance from
asylum elsewhere after the forts were Gopala Nayaker and Haider Ali and won
taken over by Yusuf Khan, returned and the battle.
began to organize against the British.
Captain Campbell who was sent this time
by the British, laid siege and captured Velu Nachiyar employed her intelligence
Nerkattumseval in 1767. Nothing is gathering agents to discover where the
definitely known about the last days of British stored their ammunition. One of
Puli Thevar. her followers Kuyili, doused herself in
oil, set herself alight, and walked into the
storehouse. She also employed another
Velu Nachiyar
agent, her adopted daughter Udaiyaal,
to detonate a British arsenal, blowing
herself up along with the barracks. Velu
Nachiyar formed a woman’s army.
ciueil
jäœ
eh‹ Kjyhtjhf¡ F¿¥ÃL« jäHf¥bg© ntY eh¢Áah®. ntY eh¢Áah®,
ÅuK« E©z¿Î« xU§nf mika¥bg‰wt®. mtnu M§»nyaiu v®¤J
MÍj« VªÂ¥ nghuhoa Kjš bg©kâ.
Ïuhkehjòu¤ij M©l k‹d® bršyK¤J
nrJg - r¡fªÂ K¤jh¤jhŸ ÏizaU¡F¡
».Ã.1730M« M©L xnu bg© kfthf¤ njh‹¿at®
ntY eh¢Áah®. Ït®, bg‰nwhuhš M© thçir¥ngh‹nw
ts®¡f¥g£L, MÍj¥gæ‰ÁKjš mid¤ijÍ« f‰W¤
nj®ªjh®. Átf§if k‹d® K¤JtLfehj® ntY
eh¢Áahiu kzªJbfh©lh®.
M§»nya® 1772M« M©L Átf§if¢
Óikæ‹ÛJ gilbaL¤jd®. M§»nyaU¡F«
K¤JtLfehjU¡F« Ïilna ngh® eilbg‰wJ.
m¥nghçš, k‹d® K¤JtLfehj® Åukuzkilªjh®. ntY eh¢Áah®, ikN®
k‹d® Ij® mèia¢ rªÂ¤J, M§»nyaiu v®¥gJ F¿¤J¡ fyªJ ngÁdh®.
mtU¡F cjt éU«Ãa Ij®mè Iahæu« gilÅu®fis mtUl‹ mD¥Ãdh®.
kUJ rnfhju®fSl‹ Åu®gil¡F¤ jiyikna‰W¢ br‹w ntY eh¢Áah®
M§»nyaiu v®¤J¥ nghç£lh®. m¥nghçš, fztiu¡ bfh‹wt®fis
bt‹W 1780M« M©oš Átf§ifia Û£lh®.
5
www.tntextbooks.in
6
www.tntextbooks.in
jäœ
eh‹ f©l ghuj« v‹D« fhªÂkÂ, eh£L éLjiy¡fhf¥ ghLg£l jäHf¥
mça üiy bg©kâfë‹ tuyh‰iw¤ bjçªJbfh©lhah?
vGÂÍŸsh®.
jäœeh£oš k£Lk‹¿, btëehLfëš ÏUªJTl
ϪÂa éLjiy¡F¥ ghLg£l bg©kâfS«
1964M« M©L cŸsd®. mt®fis¥g‰¿ mL¤j foj¤Âš
jhkiu¤ÂU (g¤k$) bjçé¡»nw‹. Ï¡foj« f©L k»œthŒ vd
éUJ bg‰WŸsh®. e«ò»nw‹. cl‹, c‹ kWkliy MtYl‹
v®gh®¡»nw‹.
m‹òl‹,
kâbkhê
ciwnkš Kftç :
j. fhªÂkÂ,
54, f©z» ÅÂ,
kæyh¥ó®, br‹id - 600 004.
7
www.tntextbooks.in
Jiz¥ghl«
Ïuhâ k§f«khŸ
12
www.tntextbooks.in
jäœ
kd¤ij¡ fšyh¡»æUªjd. kf‹ K¤JÅu¥g‹ Ïwªjjdhš, ».Ã. 1688M«
M©L bgau‹ érau§f¢ brh¡fehj‹ bgauséš mçaizæš V‰w¥g£lh‹.
gh£o k§f«khŸ fh¥gh£Áahsuhf M£Á¥ bghW¥Ãid V‰wh®. k§f«khŸ
Jau§fis¤ jh§»¡bfh©L M£Á¡ flikfis mHFw M‰w¡Toa Åuh§fid
vd k¡fŸ ngh‰¿¥ òfœªjd®.
ÂUéjh§T®¥ ngh®
ÂUéjh§T® k‹d® Ïuét®kh, kJiu eha¡f muR¡F¢ brY¤j nt©oa
Âiw¥bghUŸfis¢ brY¤jéšiy; fšFs« gFÂæèUªj eha¡f® gilia¤
jh¡» mê¤jh®. vdnt, jsg eur¥iga‹ jiyikæš k§f«khŸ mD¥Ãa
gil ÂUéjh§T®¥ gilia¤ njh‰fo¤J¤ Âiw¥bghUŸ k‰W« bgh‹, Õu§»
Kjèa bghUŸfisÍ« bg‰W¤ ÂU«ÃaJ.
jŠir¥ ngh®
jŠiria M©l kuh¤ÂaU¡F« kJiu eha¡f®fS¡F« Ïilæš ešYwÎ
ãytéšiy. xUKiw jŠir õhí, kJiu eha¡f® M£Á¥gFÂfŸ Áyt‰iw¡
if¥g‰¿¡ bfh©lh®. mt‰iw Û£f, jsg eur¥iga‹ jiyikæš k§f«khŸ
xU gil mD¥Ãdh®. m¥gil m¥gFÂfis Û£L¤ jŠiria m¢RW¤ÂaJ.
jŠir mik¢r® ghyhí g©oj® gilbaL¥ghs®fS¡F¥ bgU«bghUŸ
bfhL¤jD¥Ãdh®.
13
www.tntextbooks.in
ikN®¥ ngh®
Ïuhâ k§f«khŸ fhy¤Âš ikN® k‹d‹ Á¡fnjtuha‹ fhéçæ‹
FW¡nf mizf£oanghJ, k§f«khŸ jŠirÍldhd gifia kwªJ, mªeh£L
muR cjéÍl‹ v®¥ò¤ bjçé¤jnjhL m‹¿, ikN®ÛJ gilbaL¡f
jŠir-kJiu¡ T£L¥gil x‹wid cUth¡»dh®. gil jahuhdJ. Mdhš,
Ï›ntisæš fUehlf¥ gFÂæš fL«kiH bgŒjjdhš Á¡fnjtuha‹ f£oa
mizfŸ cilªjd; Á¡fš KotilªjJ.
rka¡ bfhŸif
kJiu eha¡f k‹d®fis¥nghynt k§f«khŸ rka¥bghiwia¡ fil¥Ão¤jh®;
»¿¤jt kj¡FUkh®fis¢ rka¥ ngUiu M‰w mDk¤jh®. x›bthUtU«
jh« Áwªjjhf¡ fUJ« rka¤ij¡ if¡bfh©L thHéLtnj jUk« v‹w
bfhŸifia k§f«khŸ Ëg‰¿dh®. rka¤ bjhl®ghf¢ Áiw it¡f¥g£l
bkšnyh ghÂçahiu éLjiy brŒjnjhL nghnr¤ v‹w FUit¤ j«
muritæš tunt‰W éUªnjh«Ãdh®.
ÏRyhäa®fS¡F« k§f«khŸ khåa« më¤JŸsh®. ÏRyhäa®fë‹
ešthœé‰fhfΫ gŸëthršfë‹ ghJfh¥Ã‰fhfΫ ãy§fis khåakhf
tH§»aJ F¿¤J¡ fšbt£LfŸ TW»‹wd.
jäœ
k§f«khŸ mw¢brašfŸ
k¡fŸ ey«ngQ« ešy gy gâfis k§f«khŸ brŒJŸsh®. mt®,
kJiuæš bgçabjhU m‹d¢r¤Âu¤ij¡ f£odh®; òÂa rhiyfŸ gy mik¤jh®;
f‹åahFkç¡F« kJiu¡F« Ïilna mikªj beLŠrhiy, k§f«khŸ rhiy
vd miH¡f¥gL»wJ. FÂiufŸ, gR¡fŸ, fhisfŸ Kjèad Ú® mUªJtj‰F
trÂahf¢ rhiynahu§fëš j©Ù®¤ bjh£ofis¤ Âw¡f Mizæ£lh®.
bghJk¡fS¡fhf¡ FoÚ®¡ Fs§fŸ, CUâfŸ, »zWfŸ M»at‰iw¤
njh©l¢ brŒjh®. bjhêš ts®¢Á, thâf«, k¡fŸbjhl®ò M»at‰¿‰F
têtF¤jh®. kJiu Ûdh£Áa«k‹ Mya¤Â‰F¥ bgh‹D« bghUS« tH§»dh®.
14
www.tntextbooks.in
jäœ
tU«bghGJ, eh‹ vÂnu tUtjid¡ ftå¡f¤ jt¿é£lh‹. ÏiwtD¡F
K‹dhš V‰w¤jhœÎfŸ Ïšiy; midtU« x‹nw. mtid mt‹ têæš
nghf éL§fŸ” v‹W bgUªj‹iknahL T¿dh®.
khÂç édh¡fŸ
beLédh¡fŸ
1. Ïuhâ k§f«khŸ M£Á¡fhy¤Âš eilbg‰w ngh®fŸ F¿¤J vGJf.
2. Ïuhâ k§f«khŸ brŒj mw¢brašfŸ ahit?.
15
விரிவானம்
இயல்
ஏழு வேலுநாச்சியார்
155
” ந ம் அ ர சி ய ா ரி ன் பன்மொ ழி
அறிவு நமக்குப் பெரிய நன்மையைத்
தந்திருக்கிறது” என்றார் சின்ன மருது.
” ஆ ம் . நம து வீ ர ர ்க ளு ட ன்
ஐதர்அலியின் ஐயாயிரம் குதிரைப்படை
வீரர ்க ளும் சேர்ந் து விட்டனர். நா ம்
படை யு ட ன் ந ா ள ை சி வ க ங ்கையை
மீட்கப் புறப்படலாம் அல்லவா?” என்று
கேட்டார் பெரிய மருது.
156
” வி ஜ ய த ச மி ந ா ளி ல் க�ோட்டைக் கு ள் ச ெ ல ்வ த ற் கு ப்
பெண்களுக்கு மட்டும் அனுமதி உண்டு. நமது பெண்கள்
பிரிவினர் கூடைகளில் பூக்கள், பழங்கள் ஆகியவற்றுடன்
ஆ யு த ங ்கள ை யு ம் மறை த் து க் க�ொண் டு க�ோட்டைக் கு ள்
செல்லட்டும். உள்ளே அவர்கள் தாக்குதலைத் த�ொடங்கியதும்
நம து ஆ ண ்க ள் பி ரி வி ன ரு ம் க�ோட்டைக் கு ள் நு ழைந் து
தாக்கட்டும். ஆங்கிலேயரை விரட்டியடித்து விடலாம்” என்றார்
வேலுநாச்சியார்.
157
கற்பவை கற்றபின்
இககலதலே ொடக�ாக ்வகுப்ேலறயில் ெடித்துக காட்டுக.
மதிப்பீடு
158
Freedom Struggle
in Tamil Nadu
Learning Objectives
To acquaint ourselves with:
Anti-colonial struggles in Tamil Nadu
Contribution of Christian missionaries to the development of education
and amelioration of the depressed classes
Challenge of the Justicites to the Congress in Tamil Nadu
Militant mass movement of the Congress in Tamil Nadu
SUMMARY
Contributions of Madras Native Association, Madras Mahajana Sabha and the nationalist
press to the growth of nationalism in Tamil Nadu are discussed.
Swadeshi phase of the Indian National Movement in Tamil Nadu, with focus on role played
by V.O.C., Subramania Siva, Subramania Bharathi, is detailed.
Non-Brahmin Movement throwing up challenges to nationalist politics during Dyarchy is
highlighted.
Non-cooperation Movement, E.V.R.’s differences with the Congress,the birth of Swaraj Party
at the national level and the Self-Respect Movement in the Tamil region are examined.
Tamil Nadu’s participation in the Civil Disobedience Movement organised to protest the
disappointment over Simon Commission and the Round Table Conferences are dealt with.
The elections under Government of India Act, 1935 and the formation of first Congress
Ministry in Madras under Rajaji are outlined.
Resignation of Congress Ministries following the outbreak of World War II, Quit India
Movement and Tamil participation in it are described.
EXERCISE
LESSON 17
ROLE OF TAMIL NADU IN THE INDIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT
Learning Objectives
2. Swadeshi Movement.
Tamil Nadu played an important role in the Indian National Movement. Even
prior to the Great Revolt of 1857, the rebellion in Panchalam Kuruchi, the 1801
“South Indian Rebellion” of the Marudu brothers and the Vellore Mutiny of 1806
were the early anti-colonial struggles in Tamil Nadu. During the nationalist era
Tamil Nadu provided the leaders like G. Subramania Iyer, V.O.C. Chidambaram
Pillai, Subramania Bharathi, C. Rajagopalachari and K. Kamaraj to the National
Movement. Besides, the nationalist movement in Tamil Nadu was as active as
elsewhere.
The Madras Mahajana Sabha strongly supported the activities of the Indian
National Congress. It had also initiated social reform. G. Subramania Iyer performed
the remarriage of his widowed daughter in December 1889. He moved the first
resolution in the first session of the Indian National Congress in 1885. He started
the nationalist papers like The Hindu in English and Swadeshamitran in Tamil. In
1892, the Madras Provincial Conference was started to mobilize people in the rural
areas of Tamil Nadu. The third session of the Indian National Congress was held
in Madras in 1887 under the presidentship of Fakruddin Thyabji. Later a number of
such annual sessions were also held in the city of Madras.
124
www.tntextbooks.in
Bombay in December, 1915. She was supported in her movement by Tilak. Home
Rule Movement was vigorous during the First World War.
Non-co-operation Movement
In Tamil Nadu the Non-co-operation Movement was strong during the years
1921—23. Beginning in March 1921 there were campaigns of Non-Cooperation
against the foreign regulations. In 1921 and 1922 there were campaigns against
the consumption of liquor in many parts of the province. Temperance campaign was
particularly prominent in Madurai. Non- Cooperation had been a success in Tamil
Nadu. C. Rajagopalachari, S. Satyamurthi and E. V. Ramaswami Naicker were the
important leaders of the Non- Cooperation Movement in Tamil Nadu. At that time
E. V. Ramaswami Naicker was the President of the Tamil Nadu Congress
Committee. C. Rajagopalachari stressed that the council boycott was a central part
of the Gandhian Programme. However, this view was not shared by Kasturi Ranga
Iyengar, Srinivasa Iyengar, Varadarajulu Naidu and Vijayaraghavachari.
Salt Satyagraha
126
www.tntextbooks.in
district. The March began on Tamil New Year’s Day (13th April). The March reached
Vedaranyam on 28 April 1930. Two days later Rajagopalachari was arrested for
breaking the salt laws. Some of the other important leaders who participated in
the Vedaranyam Salt Satyagraha were T.S.S. Rajan, Mrs. Lakshmipathi Sardar
Vedaratnam Pillai, C. Swaminatha Chetty and K.Santhanam.
Tiruppur Kumaran who led the flag march was fatally beaten. Since he
guarded the national flag in his hands he was called Kodi Kaththa Kumaran.
Commemorating his sacrifice the Goverment of India issued a postal stamp in his
honour.
Later, in 1937 when elections were held in accordance with the 1935 Act,
Congress won the elections and formed the ministry in Madras headed by C.
Rajagopalachari. There were nine other ministers in his cabinet. The ministry was
in power from July 1937 to October 1939. The ministry had resigned along with
other Congress ministries in the different provinces over the issue of the Indian
involvement in the Second World War.
During Second War, after the failure of the Cripps’s Proposals Gandhi had
launched the Quit India Movement. In Tamil Nadu Quit India Movement drew the
factory workers, students and common people. It was a wide spread movement.
The Buckingham & Carnatic Mills, Port Trust and the Tramway workers joined the
movement in large numbers. Quit India Movement was launched in places like North
Arcot, Madurai and Coimbatore. There was police firing at Rajapalayam, Karaikudi
and Devakottai. Besides, Subhash Bose’s INA had many men and women soldiers
from Tamil Nadu.
Finally, when India attained independence on 15th August, 1947 the Madras
Government under O.P. Ramaswami Reddiar passed a resolution appreciating the
Indian Independence Act.
127
www.tntextbooks.in
Learning Outcome
2. Those leaders who led the masses from Tamil Nadu in the
Swadeshi Movement.
MODEL QUESTIONS
1. Who among the following moved the first resolution in the first session of the
Indian National Congress?
(a) Gandhi (b) Rajaji
(c) V.O.C (d) Kamaraj
128