Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
This article makes a strong case for differentiating the political systems of different states in India on
the basis of the balance of caste/class power and the nature of party organisation within those states. Such
differences can then be shown to influence the policy formulation and performances of these states, especially
with regard to decentralisation of power to lower caste/class groups and alleviation of poverty.
IT has been suggested - for example, by Approaching the ideal of democracy,
context. Others have disagreed. V S Vyas
Atul Kohli (1987) - that India constitutes and P Bhargava, for example, summing therefore, depends upon the differentiation
a 'laboratory' for comparative political up the findings of comparative studiesof
ofthe realm of politics from overall systems
public intervention and rural poverty
analysis. The fact that the country has a of inequality in a society - so that collective
decisions are not made by particular
alleviation in nine states, say emphatically
number of states with quite diverse politics,
but within the framework of Indian individuals or groups of people because
that "success in poverty alleviation efforts
federalism, creates conditions for 'con-
was not significantly affected ... [at least]
of the power derived from their economic
trolled experiments'. But these apparent
by the professed political ideology of the or social status [Rueschmayer et al 1992
opportunities have not been taken up very 41ff]. In practice democratic forms of
ruling parties in the different states" (1995:
2572). The debate which is inherent government,
much. There are important bodies of work in involving the accountability
by individual scholars on the politics of different statements is more signi-
these of the executive to an assembly of repre-
particular states - one thinks officantthe than it once was because of the sentatives elected through free, open
sustained research by Zoya Hasan increased
and elections,
salience of state-level politics in in the context of freedom of
the context of India's economic reforms.
Paul Brass on Uttar Pradesh, that of James expression and association, can never
Manor on Karnataka, of Jayant LeleThe and
greater financial autonomy of the states eliminate altogether the significance of
latterly, of Thomas Blom Hansen on these entail "is likely to combinedifferences of wealth, power and status in
which
Maharashtra, and of Ghanshyam Shah with
on increased regulatory autonomy ...society. Hence, the Marxists have generally
making the state level a more importantrejected such representative democracy as
Gujarat. It is also striking that some states
have not been the subjects of such political
con- arena, and therefore, more in needa sham, concealing the exercise of power
sistent research. And exercises in com- of study" [Jenkins 1996: 198]. The effortby the dominant class. The view expressed
parative politics have been rather thin of
on developing a comparative analysis of by Rueschmayer and his co-authors is that
the ground. Efforts were made in collabo-
state politics seems worthwhile, therefore.the ideal of democracy is approached more
rative exercises on the politics of various or less closely according to the balance of
DEFINING REGIME DIFFERENCES
states orchestrated by Myron Weiner class power in a society, and the nature
(1968), by Iqbal Narain (1967 and 1976)The term 'regime' is used widely butof the state system. The development of
and then by John Wood (1984). The latter quite loosely in political science. It is quitecapitalism is, in some ways, actually con-
includes an interesting comparative essayoften applied to a particular government,ducive to approaching the democratic ideal
by Roderick Church which is referred as to in 'the Telugu Desam regime in Andhrabecause it weakens the power of landlords
Pradesh'; but as frequently it is appliedand strengthens subordinate classes,
later in this article. Then Kohli published
the results of his research on the effec- to such broad distinctions as that between shifting them from the relatively un-
tiveness of different party regimes indemocratic and authoritarian forms of rule. favourable environment of peasant agri-
Karnataka (that of the Congress underClearly, in a discussion of Indian states,culture in which, as Marx argued in The
Devaraj Urs), in UP (the Janata coalition)operating within the framework of federalEighteenth Brumaire, they are 'like
and in West Bengal (the Left Front), indemocracy laid down in the Constitutionpotatoes in a sack' - divided from each
relation to poverty reduction, in his bookof India, the latter distinction does notother, lacking a sense of a collective
The State and Poverty in India (1987). Butapply. We may be concerned, however,interest, and given their identity by the
with differences in the democratic
the most ambitious comparative project so more self-conscious classes which make
far has been that of Francine Frankel and functioning of different states, and describe
up the rest of society. The democratic ideal
M S A Rao, who brought together work these in terms of 'regime types'. is approached more closely, too, if the
by a group of scholars within a framework 'Democracy' is taken to mean: 'govern-
state-system (the organisation of the state)
is relatively autonomous in relation to
which focused on the problematic of 'the ment by the people; the form of government
decline of dominance' (1989, 1990). The in which sovereign power resides society.
in the But there is narrow gap between
exercise which I have undertaken draws people and is exercised either directly by
the Scylla, of a state-system dominated by
heavily upon, and aims to extend the workthem [participatory democracy] particular
or by interests within society, such as
of Frankel and Rao. officers elected by them [representative
those of landlords, or of industrial capital,
Kohli concluded from his comparative democracy]'. Clearly, this is a statement
or of finance capital, and the Charybdis,
study that differences between the political of a state-system which is absolutely
of an ideal, for it evades the real problems
regimes of different states do makeofa collective action, which arise from the
autonomous and able to exercise dic-
significant difference, specifically to the
fact that the goals held by individualstatorship over society, over-riding the
('the
people') rarely coincide absolutely.
adoption of pro-poor policies in the Indian interests and aspirations of 'the people'.
This reflects the continuing power of groups should be the subjects of positive Karnataka: Myth of Success', EPW, August
discrimination - as are the schedule castes - 19.
locally dominant castes/classes which can
on account of their 'social' backwardness. Datt, G and M, Ravallion (1998) 'Why Have
lead to what has been described as
Article 340 of the Indian Constitution refers Some Indian States Done Better Than Others
'responsive wage deceleration', ortothe
'other backward classes' who may be eligible At Reducing Rural Poverty', Economica.
bidding down of wages by the locally
for preferential treatment in access to publicEcheverri-Gent, J (1995): The State and the Poor:
powerful. Andhra Pradesh, too, has a sector
moreemployment or to educational Public Policy and.Political Development in