High-Strain Dynamic Test Report for Pile P1-03

M.G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd.
MGCPL/SITE/HSR-PKG1B/2022-23/1210 DATE 03/08/2022
To,
Chief Contracts Manager,
TCEL-CEGL-AARVEE ASSOCIATE- PADECO JV
A-204, 2nd floor, Swatisk Universal,
Opposite Central Mall, Dumas Road,
New Magdalla, Piplod, Surat,
Gujarat – 395007.
Sub: Construction of Bridges for Double Line High-Speed Railway for 04 No. PSC Bridges
(GAD 9, 10, 11 & 1441) and 07 No. Steel Truss Bridges (GAD 68, 1134, 12, 61, 14, 15 & 62)
[excluding fabrication and transportation of steel truss girders] between Zaroli Village at
Maharashtra-Gujarat Border (MAHSR Km. 156.600) and Vadodara (MAHSR Km. 393.700),
in the State of Gujarat and the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli for the Project for
Construction of Mumbai-Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail Package No. MAHSR-P-1(B)
“Submission of High-Strain Dynamic Test Report of R.C. Bored Cast-in Situ Working
Pile at GAD 68_P1_03”
Dear sir,
With reference to the above–mentioned subject, please find enclosed herewith the report of
the High-Strain Dynamic Test conducted on R.C. Bored Cast-in Situ Working Pile at GAD
68_P1_03.
Submitting your necessary information and record, please.
Thanking you.
For M.G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd.
(Vipin Kumar Agarwal)

Authorized Signatory
Encl.: - High-Strain Dynamic Test on R.C. Bored Cast-in Situ Working Pile at GAD
68_P1_03.
Head Office: M.G. House, Plot No- 376 Industrial Area Phase- 2, Panchkula – 134112 (Haryana), Tel: 0172-6731000, 6731025
Regd. Office: # 603, Ring Road Mall, Deepali Chowk, Sector – 3, Rohini, New Delhi – 110085 Tel: 011-47019300, Fax 011-43852385
CIN No.: U70101DL1997PTC091013, E-mail: mgcpl@mgcpl.com Website: mgcpl.com
MUMBAI AHMEDABAD HIGH SPEED RAIL (MAHSR) PROJECT
PACKAGE - P1 (B) AT VALSAD, GUJARAT
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING

ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
(PILE LOCATION: CH: 159.670 - P1)
(PILE NO. P1-03)
CLIENT : National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. (NHRCL)
ENGINEER : TCEL-CEGL-AARVEE Associates-PADECO JV. (TCAP)
CONTRACTOR : M/s. MG Contractor Pvt. Ltd.

V. Po. Sisodara, Near RTO Office,
Taluka – Navasari,
Dist.-Navasari – 396 463
Gujarat
TEST AGENCY : M/s. GEO DYNAMICS

GD House, 201-202, Atmajyoti Ashram Road,
Ellora Park, Vadodara - 390023
Tele: +91-265-2388139, 2393205
Web Site: www.geodynamics.net
PROJECT NO. : PDA-J362-01
DATE : July 29, 2022
Note: 1) This test report or part of the same shall not be reproduced without written permission from the GEO DYNAMICS CONTROLLED Copy
2) The results are related to the test performed at location shown by client
Page 1 of 19
CONTENTS Page No.
1. INTRODUCTION 3
3
2. TEST EQUIPMENT
3
3. PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS
4
4. CAPWAP ANALYSIS
5
5. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A : TEST REPORT FOR HIGH STRAIN DYNAMIC TEST ON PILE NO: P1-03 6-8
APPENDIX B : CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR PILE NO: P1-03 9-15
APPENDIX C : HIGH STRAIN DYNAMIC LOAD TEST FIELD DATASHEET 16-17
APPENDIX D : SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 18-19
Rv/Dn
Page 2 of 19
Project No.: PDA-J362-01 July 29, 2022
MUMBAI AHMEDABAD HIGH SPEED RAIL (MAHSR) PROJECT PACKAGE - P1 (B) AT

VALSAD, GUJARAT
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
PILE NO. P1-03 (PILE LOCATION: CH: 159.670 - P1)
1.0 INTRODUCTION
M/s. Geo Dynamics was engaged by M/s. MG Contractor Pvt. Ltd. to conduct high-strain dynamic
test on one r. c. bored pile installed at the above project site.
The aim of testing was to evaluate pile static capacity and measure the settlement. The field test
was conducted on 28th July, 2022. This report presents the results of dynamic pile testing and
analysis performed using the Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) and CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program
(CAPWAP). The test was conducted in accordance with ASTM D4945.
2.0 TEST EQUIPMENT
A Pile Driving Analyzer and its associated pile top force and velocity transducers were used to
conduct the dynamic pile test.
Two strain transducers and two accelerometers were attached to the pile head. They were
mounted on opposite sides of the pile to cancel bending effects during each strike of the hammer.
The signals of strain and acceleration were conditioned and processed by PDA.
The PDA is a micro-processor based signal conditioner and digital computer. Signals of pile top
force and velocity were measured and analyzed during each strike of the pile driving hammer and
stored in the Analyzer. The pile top force and velocity-time curves were displayed on PDA screen.
The PDA onsite uses a program based on closed form Case-Goble solutions to compute static
pile capacity from the pile top force and velocity data. This is subsequently checked with the
computer program CAPWAP to confirm the static pile capacity obtained on site.
3.0 PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS
Dynamic testing on the pile was conducted by striking the pile with the hammer during the
restriking process. During testing of the pile, complete dynamic measurements were obtained for
each hammer blow delivered to the pile. The field results along with comments are summarized in
Table 1. The PDA measures the total (static plus dynamic) resistance acting on the pile. The
portion of total resistance that is computed as static resistance by the Analyzer is determined by
the soil damping factor Jc set into the analyzer. A more accurate independent measure of the
applicable soil-damping factor was determined using a CAPWAP analysis.
The values measured by the PDA on field are obtained assuming that the pile is uniform
throughout its length. Also, the soil parameters like quake and damping should be assumed
Page 3 of 19
Project No.: PDA-J362-01
during the field test. Hence the CAPWAP is mandatory for all bored piles to estimate realistic
soil parameters as well as pile profile.
The values measured by the PDA on field are obtained assuming that the pile is uniform
throughout its length. Also, the soil parameters like quake and damping should be assumed
during the field test. Hence the CAPWAP is mandatory for all bored piles to estimate realistic
soil parameters as well as pile profile. Typically one of the blows that is close to the test load is
subjected to CAPWAP analysis. In summary, PDA measures the field capacity while CAPWAP
refines the field results and hence field capacities measured using PDA may not match with the
CAPWAP analysis.
The BETA Value (Integrity Factor) indicates change in the pile impedance and is derived from
the CAPWAP analysis. The PDA is basically used to compute capacity and the BETA factor.
Particularly for bored piles BETA may never be 100% due to inherent nature of installation. A
BETA factor less than 60% indicates a shaft with poor integrity. Such shaft may require remedial
action in the form of reduced loads, redesigning the cap or installation of additional pile as
recommended by the engineer to the project. General guidelines for the assessment of pile
integrity are presented in table below.
PDI recommended guidelines for integrity assessment
INTEGRITY
Description COMMENT
(BETA FACTOR)
100% Uniform Pile OK
80%-99% Slight Damage Minor Defect
60%-80% Damage Some Defect
< 60% Pile Broken Major Defect
The PDA field capacity is estimated by either RMX or RSU for an assumed Jc value and on the
assumption of uniform cross-section of the pile. RMX is the maximum Case-Goble Resistance
(Maximum Capacity) for the assume Jc value (Case Damping) at the project site. The RMX
capacity generally holds good when the pile shows a reasonable movement under the load. The
RSU capacity is applicable when there is very high skin friction and in most cases the pile
movement is nominal. Hence a more realistic estimate of the pile capacity is obtained from the
CAPWAP analysis conducted on one typical blow at the end of testing program.
4.0 CAPWAP ANALYSIS
A selected PDA field recording of force and velocity data for a blow delivered to the pile was
further analyzed using the computer software CAPWAP. The analysis involved applying the
measured pile top velocity time record to the top of a lumped-mass and spring wave equation
model of the pile.
The program computes the pile top force-time record and this is then compared to the actual
measured force-time record. The pile and soil resistance model is then adjusted in an iterative
procedure until good match is obtained between measured and computed forces.
The pile and soil models can then be used to determine the estimated static load-settlement
curve. The results of CAPWAP analysis for a typical blow are briefly summarized in Appendix A
(Test Results).
Page 4 of 19
5.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Pile No. P1-03
The CAPWAP analysis results for Pile No. P1-03 showed that the pile had achieved an
activated capacity of 33199kN at the time of testing. This resistance is 1.2 times the test load.
The capacity is applicable at the time of testing and further soil strength changes with time had
to be considered.
The CAPWAP results showed that the maximum compressive stress experienced by the pile at
the hammer impact was about 16.5 N/mm2. This stress is within the allowable stress limits. The
pile integrity was observed to be OK.
From CAPWAP analysis, the pile top load vs. settlement curve is obtained by simulating static
load test. The pile top settlement at 26197kN (equivalent test load for static test) is estimated to
be around 5.3mm. Please refer to static analysis in Appendix A.
This report has been prepared with generally accepted high strain dynamic pile testing practices
and as per ASTM D4945. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The findings
provided in this report are based on the result of the individual pile tested and information made
available to us.
*****END OF PROJECT REPORT*****
Page 5 of 19
APPENDIX A
TEST REPORT FOR HIGH STRAIN DYNAMIC TEST ON
PILE NO. P1-03
Page 6 of 19
`
TEST REPORT
Test Report No. TR-PDA-J362-01 ULR No.: ----
Project No. PDA-J362-01 M/s. MG Contractor Pvt. Ltd.

Client V. Po. Sisodara, Near RTO Office,
Pile Tested By Mr. Dixit Nakum Address and Taluka – Navasari,
contact Dist.-Navasari – 396 463
number Gujarat
Report Issue Date 29/07/2022
Mr. Pradeep Singh - 9081903093
Test Location CH: 159.670 - P1
Type of pile* R. C. Bored
Date of Testing 28/07/2022 Equipment used Pile Driving Analyzer, PDI -USA
Discipline Non-Destructive Testing

Rev
00
Group Building Materials - Reinforced Concrete Structures
Deflection Measurement Data (Load Test –High Strain Dynamic Pile Test) Page
Test Method
(ASTM D4945-17) 1 of 2
PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS
Pile No.* P1-03
EGL* +26.66m Hammer Weight 18.94 T
Pile Diameter* 1500mm Working Load* --
Pile length below gages* 18.25m Test Load* 26197 kN
Pile length below ground* 18.00m Soil Data Availability* Available
Liner length from test level* Unlined Date of Pile Casting* 13/04/2022
Concrete Grade* M40 -- --
*Information provided by Client
TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS
Height Pile Capacity (kN) Net

Sr. Total Settlement
Pile No. of Fall Settlement Comments
No. (mm)
(m) RMX RSU (mm)
1. 0.50 13301 13444 0.87 2.59 --

Used for
2. 1.00 22594 20203 1.08 3.76
P1-03 analysis
3. 1.50 29198 24161 0.46 5.27 Analysis not
4. 1.50 28390 21031 0.09 5.22 required
Note: 1) This test report or part of the same shall not be reproduced without written permission from the GEO DYNAMICS CONTROLLED copy
Doc. No.: F/7.8/01A/Issue No.03/Issue Date: 10-12-2021/ Amend No.:00 / Amend Date: - Page 7 of 19
Test Report No.: TR-PDA-J362-01 ULR No.: ----
Discipline : Non-Destructive Testing

Rev
00
Group: Building Materials - Reinforced Concrete Structures
Deflection Measurement Data (Load Test –High Strain Dynamic Pile Page
Test Method :
Test) ( ASTM D4945-17) 2 of 2
TEST RESULTS
Pile No. P1-03 Permissible Limits Remark
Pile Capacity 33199 kN --
Skin Friction 28380 kN --
End Bearing 4819 kN -- Refer clause no. 5 of

project report for
Set per blow 1.0 mm 3-4 mm Summary of Test
results.
Total Displacement 8.8 mm --
Compressive Stress 16.5 N/mm2 0.85fck
Pile Integrity (80%-99% classified
OK
(Below Sensor Level) as minor defect)
Notes:
 If there is any error in any of the details provided by the customer/ client, the same
will be carried forward in the report.
 Refer Appendix B of Project report for CAPWAP Analysis.
Authorized Singnatory Authorized Signatory
*****END OF TEST REPORT*****
Note: 1) This test report or part of the same shall not be reproduced without written permission from the GEO DYNAMICS CONTROLLED copy
Doc. No.: F/7.8/01A/Issue No.03/Issue Date: 10-12-2021/ Amend No.:00 / Amend Date: - Page 8 of 19
APPENDIX B
CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR
PILE NO. P1-03
Note: 1) This test report or part of the same shall not be reproduced without written permission from the GEO DYNAMICS
2) The results are related to the test performed at location shown by client Page 9 of 19
28-7-GAD68-MAHSR-1B; Pile: P1-03 Test: 28-Jul-2022 18:13
1500MM; Blow: 2 CAPWAP(R) 2014-3
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
CAPWAP SUMMARY RESULTS
Total CAPWAP Capacity: 33199.2; along Shaft 28380.5; at Toe 4818.7 kN
Soil Dist. Depth Ru Force Sum Unit Unit Quake
Sgmnt Below Below in Pile of Resist. Resist.
No. Gages Grade Ru (Depth) (Area)
m m kN kN kN kN/m kPa mm
33199.2
1 2.0 1.8 1435.6 31763.6 1435.6 807.52 171.36 2.3
2 4.1 3.8 2618.2 29145.4 4053.8 1291.17 273.99 2.3
3 6.1 5.8 2772.5 26372.9 6826.3 1367.26 290.14 2.3
4 8.1 7.9 2772.5 23600.4 9598.8 1367.26 290.14 2.3
5 10.1 9.9 2772.5 20827.9 12371.3 1367.26 290.14 2.3
6 12.2 11.9 2772.5 18055.4 15143.8 1367.26 290.14 2.3
7 14.2 13.9 3781.9 14273.5 18925.7 1865.05 395.78 2.0
8 16.2 16.0 4727.4 9546.1 23653.1 2331.32 494.72 1.7
9 18.3 18.0 4727.4 4818.7 28380.5 2331.32 494.72 1.4
Avg. Shaft 3153.4 1576.69 334.58 2.0
Toe 4818.7 2726.83 1.1

Soil Model Parameters/Extensions Shaft Toe
Smith Damping Factor 0.82 0.81

Case Damping Factor 1.33 0.22
Damping Type Viscous Sm+Visc
Unloading Quake (% of loading quake) 100 94
Reloading Level (% of Ru) 100 100
Unloading Level (% of Ru) 15
Resistance Gap (included in Toe Quake) (mm) 0.0
Soil Plug Weight (kN) 260.000
max. Top Comp. Stress = 16.1 MPa (T= 24.1 ms, max= 1.026 x Top)
max. Comp. Stress = 16.5 MPa (Z= 2.0 m, T= 24.3 ms)
max. Tens. Stress = -3.79 MPa (Z= 10.1 m, T= 36.8 ms)
max. Energy (EMX) = 86.9 kJ; max. Measured Top Displ. (DMX)= 3.8 mm
Analysis: 30-Jul-2022
EXTREMA TABLE
Pile Dist. max. min. max. max. max. max. max.
Sgmnt Below Force Force Comp. Tens. Trnsfd. Veloc. Displ.
No. Gages Stress Stress Energy
m kN kN MPa MPa kJ m/s mm
1 1.0 28462.2 -2126.1 16.1 -1.20 86.9 0.90 3.8
2 2.0 29210.9 -3124.4 16.5 -1.77 85.6 0.85 3.6
3 3.0 27437.3 -3410.5 15.5 -1.93 78.6 0.80 3.5
4 4.1 28147.8 -4775.4 15.9 -2.70 77.6 0.74 3.3
5 5.1 24891.0 -4826.0 14.1 -2.73 67.7 0.72 3.3
6 6.1 25180.6 -6092.4 14.2 -3.45 67.2 0.70 3.2
7 7.1 22110.9 -6000.8 12.5 -3.40 57.8 0.70 3.1
8 8.1 22491.5 -6679.1 12.7 -3.78 57.2 0.69 3.0
9 9.1 19599.5 -6200.9 11.1 -3.51 48.3 0.69 2.9
10 10.1 19327.8 -6689.0 10.9 -3.79 47.3 0.71 2.8
11 11.2 16590.9 -5930.5 9.4 -3.36 38.8 0.71 2.6
12 12.2 17416.3 -6144.0 9.9 -3.48 37.3 0.69 2.4
13 13.2 15222.2 -5650.7 8.6 -3.20 29.3 0.65 2.3
14 14.2 16126.6 -5854.1 9.1 -3.31 27.7 0.66 2.0
15 15.2 13456.8 -4737.2 7.6 -2.68 20.1 0.69 1.9
16 16.2 14532.1 -4584.8 8.2 -2.59 18.8 0.68 1.7
17 17.2 10462.0 -2828.2 5.9 -1.60 11.6 0.67 1.6
18 18.3 11074.9 -2699.2 6.3 -1.53 6.0 0.61 1.5
Absolute 2.0 16.5 (T = 24.3 ms)
10.1 -3.79 (T = 36.8 ms)
CASE METHOD
J = 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
RP 24835 23250 21665 20080 18496 16911 15326 13741 12156 10572
RX 29045 27691 26338 24984 23630 22276 20923 19569 18215 16861
RU 26877 25496 24116 22735 21354 19974 18593 17213 15832 14451
RAU = 1150 (kN); RA2 = 28954 (kN)
Current CAPWAP Ru = 33199 (kN); Corresponding J(RP)= 0.00; J(RX) = 0.00
VMX TVP VT1*Z FT1 FMX DMX DFN SET EMX QUS KEB
m/s ms kN kN kN mm mm mm kJ kN kN/mm
0.92 22.31 16320 24363 28525 3.8 1.5 1.0 86.2 36115 4495
PILE PROFILE AND PILE MODEL

Depth Area E-Modulus Spec. Weight Perim.
m m2 MPa kN/m3 m
0.0 1.77 39972.9 24.500 4.71
18.3 1.77 39972.9 24.500 4.71
Toe Area 1.77 m2
Page 2 Analysis: 30-Jul-2022
Segmnt Dist. Impedance Imped. Tension Compression Perim. Wave Soil
Number B.G. Change Slack Eff. Slack Eff. Speed Plug
m kN/m/s % mm mm m m/s kN
1 1.0 17659.5 0.0 500.00 0.300 -0.00 0.000 4.71 4000.0 0.000
2 2.0 19659.5 11.3 0.00 0.000 -0.00 0.000 4.71 4000.0 0.000
3 3.0 19659.5 11.3 0.00 0.000 -0.00 0.000 4.71 4000.0 20.000
4 4.1 17659.5 0.0 0.00 0.000 -0.00 0.000 4.71 4000.0 20.000
5 5.1 17659.5 0.0 0.00 0.000 -0.00 0.000 4.71 4000.0 25.000
6 6.1 20159.5 14.2 0.00 0.000 -0.00 0.000 4.71 4000.0 30.000
10 10.1 17659.5 0.0 0.00 0.000 -0.00 0.000 4.71 4000.0 25.000
13 13.2 17659.5 0.0 0.00 0.000 -0.00 0.000 4.71 4000.0 0.000
18 18.3 17659.5 0.0 0.00 0.000 -0.00 0.000 4.71 4000.0 0.000
Wave Speed: Pile Top 4000.0, Elastic 4000.0, Overall 4000.0 m/s
Pile Damping 2.00 %
Total volume: 33.671 m3; Volume ratio considering added impedance: 1.044
Time (ms) 0.0 27.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0
Time Incr 0.253 0.200 0.180 0.200 0.300 0.500
28-7-GAD68-MAHSR-1B; Pile: P1-03; 1500MM; Blow: 2 (Test: 28-Jul-2022 18:13:) 30-Jul-2022

GEO DYNAMICS CAPWAP(R) 2014-3
30000 30000
Force Msd Force Msd
kN kN
Force Cpt Velocity Msd
15000 15000
5 105 ms 5 105 ms
0 0
18 L/c 18 L/c
-15000 -15000
Pile Impedance
3000
Load (kN) Shaft Resistance Length b. Sensors 18.3 m
Pile Top 2400 Distribution Embedment 18.0 m
0 8000 16000 24000 32000 40000
0.0 Bottom Top Area 1.77 m2
1800 End Bearing Area 1.77 m2
k N /m
Top Perimeter 4.71 m
RU = 33199 kN 1200 Top E-Modulus 39973 MPa
SF = 28380 kN Top Spec. Weight 24.5 kN/m3
D is p la c e m e n t (m m )
EB = 4819 kN 600 Top Wave Spd. 4000 m/s

5.0
Dy = 7.8 mm 0 Overall W.S. 4000 m/s
Dx = 8.8 mm 0 EB
SET/Bl = 1.0 mm 8000 Match Quality 3.06
Top Compr. Stress 16.1 MPa
10.0 16000 Max Compr. Stress 16.5 MPa
SF Max Tension Stress -3.79 MPa
kN
24000
Avg. Shaft Quake 2.0 mm
32000 Pile Force Toe Quake 1.1 mm
at Ru Avg. Shaft Smith Dpg. 0.82 s/m
15.0 40000 Toe Smith Damping 0.81 s/m
CAPWAP(R) 2014-3 Licensed to GEO DYNAMICS
STATIC ANALYSIS
Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe
Step No. Top Load Top Disp. Toe Load Toe Disp.
kN mm kN mm
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

2 1032.7 0.2 127.2 0.0
4 2065.3 0.4 254.4 0.1
6 3098.0 0.5 381.7 0.1
8 4130.6 0.7 508.9 0.1
10 5163.3 0.9 636.1 0.1
12 6195.9 1.1 763.3 0.2
14 7228.6 1.3 890.5 0.2
16 8261.2 1.5 1017.7 0.2
18 9293.9 1.6 1145.0 0.3
20 10326.6 1.8 1272.2 0.3
22 11357.9 2.0 1399.4 0.3
24 12379.7 2.2 1526.6 0.3
26 13390.3 2.4 1653.8 0.4
28 14379.2 2.6 1781.0 0.4
30 15343.2 2.7 1908.3 0.4
32 16280.9 2.9 2035.5 0.5
34 17184.7 3.1 2162.7 0.5
36 18040.0 3.3 2289.9 0.5
39 19268.0 3.5 2480.7 0.6
42 20430.2 3.8 2671.6 0.6
45 21495.5 4.0 2862.4 0.6
48 22517.1 4.3 3053.2 0.7
51 23492.9 4.5 3244.1 0.7
54 24402.4 4.7 3434.9 0.8
57 25255.7 5.0 3613.2 0.8
61 26323.4 5.3 3831.4 0.9
65 27304.0 5.5 4027.3 0.9
69 28187.1 5.8 4200.7 1.0
73 28985.7 6.0 4351.7 1.0
78 29855.6 6.3 4509.0 1.1
83 30589.1 6.5 4631.4 1.2
89 31290.7 6.8 4732.0 1.3
96 31920.8 7.0 4785.7 1.4
104 32468.1 7.3 4818.7 1.5
113 32871.7 7.5 4818.7 1.6
121 33081.6 7.6 4818.7 1.7
125 33144.2 7.7 4818.7 1.8
128 33198.0 7.8 4818.7 1.8
129 33199.2 7.8 4818.7 1.8
145 33199.2 8.0 4818.7 2.1
161 33199.2 8.2 4818.7 2.3
177 33199.2 8.5 4818.7 2.5
189 33199.2 8.6 4818.7 2.7
195 33199.2 8.7 4818.7 2.8
198 33199.2 8.8 4818.7 2.8
Analysis: 30-Jul-2022
STATIC ANALYSIS
Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe
Step No. Top Load Top Disp. Toe Load Toe Disp.
kN mm kN mm
199 33199.2 8.8 4818.7 2.8

203 32166.5 8.6 4691.5 2.8
205 31133.9 8.4 4564.3 2.8
207 30101.2 8.2 4437.0 2.8
209 29068.6 8.0 4309.8 2.7
211 28035.9 7.9 4182.6 2.7
212 27519.6 7.8 4119.0 2.7
214 26486.9 7.6 3991.8 2.7
216 25454.3 7.4 3864.6 2.6
218 24421.6 7.2 3737.3 2.6
220 23389.0 7.0 3610.1 2.6
222 22356.3 6.9 3482.9 2.5
224 21329.0 6.7 3355.7 2.5
226 20312.8 6.5 3228.5 2.5
228 19311.3 6.3 3101.3 2.5
230 18334.9 6.1 2974.0 2.4
232 17383.3 5.9 2846.8 2.4
234 16462.1 5.8 2719.6 2.4
236 15580.7 5.6 2592.4 2.3
238 14743.5 5.4 2465.2 2.3
241 13536.3 5.2 2274.3 2.3
244 12406.3 4.9 2083.5 2.2
247 11358.5 4.7 1892.7 2.2
250 10351.7 4.4 1701.9 2.1
253 9391.9 4.2 1511.0 2.1
256 8507.6 4.0 1323.0 2.1
259 7668.6 3.7 1148.8 2.0
263 6621.9 3.5 936.2 2.0
267 5668.2 3.2 746.0 1.9
271 4803.6 2.9 578.2 1.8
275 4028.4 2.7 432.7 1.8
280 3186.0 2.4 282.4 1.7
285 2482.4 2.2 167.1 1.6
291 1806.3 2.0 74.9 1.6
298 1204.3 1.7 31.0 1.5
306 677.4 1.5 30.3 1.4
316 264.3 1.3 30.3 1.4
328 34.1 1.0 30.3 1.4
*****END OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS OUTPUT*****
APPENDIX C
HIGH STRAIN DYNAMIC LOAD TEST FIELD
DATASHEET
APPENDIX D
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
CH: 159.67 – GAD-68 - P1-03

High-Strain Dynamic Test Report for Pile P1-03

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

High-Strain Dynamic Test Report for Pile P1-03

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

M.G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd.

MGCPL/SITE/HSR-PKG1B/2022-23/1210 DATE 03/08/2022

Submitting your necessary information and record, please.

For M.G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd.

(Vipin Kumar Agarwal)

REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING

CLIENT : National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. (NHRCL)

ENGINEER : TCEL-CEGL-AARVEE Associates-PADECO JV. (TCAP)

CONTRACTOR : M/s. MG Contractor Pvt. Ltd.

TEST AGENCY : M/s. GEO DYNAMICS

PROJECT NO. : PDA-J362-01

DATE : July 29, 2022

APPENDIX B : CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR PILE NO: P1-03 9-15

APPENDIX C : HIGH STRAIN DYNAMIC LOAD TEST FIELD DATASHEET 16-17

APPENDIX D : SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 18-19

MUMBAI AHMEDABAD HIGH SPEED RAIL (MAHSR) PROJECT PACKAGE - P1 (B) AT

2.0 TEST EQUIPMENT

3.0 PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

PDI recommended guidelines for integrity assessment

100% Uniform Pile OK

80%-99% Slight Damage Minor Defect

60%-80% Damage Some Defect

< 60% Pile Broken Major Defect

4.0 CAPWAP ANALYSIS

5.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

Pile No. P1-03

*****END OF PROJECT REPORT*****

Test Report No. TR-PDA-J362-01 ULR No.: ----

Project No. PDA-J362-01 M/s. MG Contractor Pvt. Ltd.

Type of pile* R. C. Bored

Discipline Non-Destructive Testing

PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

Pile No.* P1-03

EGL* +26.66m Hammer Weight 18.94 T

Pile Diameter* 1500mm Working Load* --

Pile length below gages* 18.25m Test Load* 26197 kN

Pile length below ground* 18.00m Soil Data Availability* Available

*Information provided by Client

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

Height Pile Capacity (kN) Net

1. 0.50 13301 13444 0.87 2.59 --

Discipline : Non-Destructive Testing

Pile No. P1-03 Permissible Limits Remark

Pile Capacity 33199 kN --

Skin Friction 28380 kN --

End Bearing 4819 kN -- Refer clause no. 5 of

Authorized Singnatory Authorized Signatory

*****END OF TEST REPORT*****

Avg. Shaft 3153.4 1576.69 334.58 2.0

Toe 4818.7 2726.83 1.1

Smith Damping Factor 0.82 0.81

PILE PROFILE AND PILE MODEL

Page 2 Analysis: 30-Jul-2022

Page 3 Analysis: 30-Jul-2022

28-7-GAD68-MAHSR-1B; Pile: P1-03; 1500MM; Blow: 2 (Test: 28-Jul-2022 18:13:) 30-Jul-2022

EB = 4819 kN 600 Top Wave Spd. 4000 m/s

CAPWAP(R) 2014-3 Licensed to GEO DYNAMICS

Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe

0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe

199 33199.2 8.8 4818.7 2.8

Page 2 Analysis: 30-Jul-2022

*****END OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS OUTPUT*****

END OF PROJECT REPORT

END OF TEST REPORT

END OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS OUTPUT