Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Regioselective Hydrochlorination
An Experiment for the Undergraduate Laboratory
Philip Boudjouk,* Beon-Kyu Kim, and Byung-Hee Han
Center for Main Group Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
As pointed out by Kropp et al., hydrohalogenation is not PCl3 produced hydrochlorinated products in acceptable
a simple matter unless the double bond is activated by yields but that chlorotrimethylsilane was the most gener-
structural or electronic features (1). Using surface-mediated ally useful reagent. In this procedure, these compounds
reactions, Kropp et al. developed greatly simplified hydro- evolve hydrogen chloride at rates much faster than
halogenation procedures by using SiO2 or Al2O3 with a vari- chlorotrimethylsilane.
ety of active halides such as SOCl2, (COCl)2, Me3SiBr, and Chemoselectivity and regioselectivity were investigated
PI 3 , which feature higher yields and improved using (R)-carvone. (5R)-5-(1-Chloro-1-methylethyl)-2-
stereoselectivity over earlier methods (2). They postulated methylcyclohex-2-enone1 was obtained in 84% yield. Trace
that the hydrogen halide is formed via hydrolysis of the amounts of carvacrol are formed after 20 min. After 3 h, only
active halides by surface-bound water on the alumina or carvacrol is detected in the product mixture.
silica gel. Some of these procedures have been modified for
instructional purposes (3). Although these methods are
1.71 (s) 2.31 (s)
simple, precaution should be exercised in using oxalyl
6.71 (m) CH3 6.71 (m) CH3 CH3
chloride. Here we report a simple, convenient, and efficient H O H OH
O
procedure for the hydrochlorination of a variety of olefins Me3SiCl 3h
H2O, rt , 20min
using chlorotrimethylsilane and water: H Cl H CH(CH3)2 1.31 (d)
H3C C CH H3C C
2 CH3 (84%)
*Corresponding author.
tified as 3-chloropropionitrile (bp 174 °C [7] 174–176 °C, 1990, 112, 7433.
89%). 1H-NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3) 2.87 (t, 2H), 3.72 (t, 2H). 2. Kropp, P. J.; Daus, K. A.; Tubergen, M. W.; Kepher, K. D.;
Craig, S. L.; Wilson, V. P.; Bailargeon, M. M.; Breton, G.
Acknowledgment W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3071; Kropp, P. J.;
Crawford, S. D. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3102.
Financial support from the National Science Founda- 3. Pienta, N. J.; Crawford, S. D.; Kropp, P. J. J. Chem. Educ.
tion through grant OSR-9452892 is gratefully acknowl- 1993, 70, 682; Berreth, C. L.; Miles, W. H.; Nutaitis, C. F.
edged. J. Chem. Educ. 1994, 71, 1097.
4. Marcuzzi, F.; Melloni, G.; Modena, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974,
Note 5, 413; Fahey, R. C.; McPherson, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1971, 93, 2445.
1. 1H-NMR (CDCl 3, d): 1.57 (d, 6H), 1.81 (s, 3H), 2.1–2.8 5. March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry, 4th ed.; Wiley:
(m, 5H), 6.7 (m, 1H). New York, 1985; pp 664–666; Bernasconi, C. F.; Tetrahe-
dron 1989, 45, 4017.
Literature Cited 6. Becker, K. B.; Boschung, A. F.; Geisel, M.; Grob, C. A. Helv.
Chim. Acta 1973, 56, 2747.
1. Kropp, P. J.; Daus, K. A.; Crawford, S. D.; Tubergen, M. W.; 7. Stewart, R.; Clark, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 69, 713.
Kepher, K. D.; Craig, S. L.; Wilson, V. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.