Effective Date:

Honeywell (Date auditable) Document

Chris Nolan
Facilities Management System Owner:
July 1, 2019
Level 1 -- Management of Change Rev #: 3
Approved
Rev Date: Gregory Bopp
by:
Document #: A-FMS-1-106 May 11th, 2021
Contains Requirement(s) for following organizational levels:
☒ Facilities ☐ Field Work ☒ SBG ☐ Corporate

1. FMS Requirements
Ref # Applicability Requirement
1 Management of Change (MOC) Process
1.1 ☐ Corp A Management of Change (MOC) process is established and utilized to identify proposed changes
☒SBG
☒ Facilities that potentially impact facilities.
☐ FW Objective Documented Facilities MOC.
Evidence:
1.2 ☐ Corp The MOC process identifies the type of proposed change as temporary, emergency, permanent or
☒SBG
☒ Facilities personnel.
☐ FW Objective MOC tool, form, checklist, etc. used to identify type of change and includes facilities
Evidence: requirements
1.3 ☐ Corp Proposed changes are evaluated using an appropriate MOC tool within the established MOC
☒SBG
☒ Facilities process to identify needed actions and/or tasks to manage the change appropriately and to
☐ FW identify if there are any new, changed or no longer applicable facilities aspects resulting from the
change.
Objective MOC tool, form, checklist, etc., Facilities Aspects and Impacts.
Evidence:
1.4 ☐ Corp New, changed or no longer applicable facilities aspects are assessed for impact to the organization
☒SBG
☒ Facilities and/or assigned work and to determine if appropriate controls are in place based on risk
☐ FW assessment and rating.
Objective Facilities Aspects and Impacts.
Evidence:
1.5 ☐ Corp Results of the MOC evaluation and aspect and control evaluation are reviewed with leadership for
☒SBG
☒ Facilities approval to implement the change. The aspect risk ranking with controls must be high or less for
☐ FW approval to proceed with change with no further actions required.
Objective Facilities Aspects and Impacts.
Evidence:
1.6 ☐ Corp Aspects with extreme risk ranking must have actions with controls to reduce the risk to high or
☒SBG
☒ Facilities less. If the aspect risk ranking with controls cannot be reduced to high or less, then the proposed
☐ FW change shall not proceed.
Objective Facilities Aspects and Impacts, Facilities Action Plans
Evidence:
1.7 ☐ Corp All necessary actions resulting from the MOC process evaluation including actions required for
☒SBG
☒ Facilities aspect risk reductions are tracked to closure and documented.
☐ FW Objective Facilities Action Plan, RAIL, etc.
Evidence:
1.8 ☐ Corp Before proposed change is released to the operating standard, a pre-release or pre-start-up review

FMS 106 Management of Change

June 7, 2018
© Honeywell Proprietary and Confidential
CAUTION: Copy printed on Dec. 27, 2022.
Page 1 of 2

Honeywell Internal
 ☒SBG is conducted which identifies any immediate actions required prior to release or start up.
☒ Facilities
☐ FW Objective Documented Facilities MOC.
Evidence:
1.9 ☐ Corp Final closure of MOC is obtained after completion of all actions from the MOC evaluation process
☒SBG
☒ Facilities and pre-release or pre-start up review are completed.
☐ FW Objective Documented Facilities MOC and communication plan.
Evidence:

2. Revision History
Revision Section Revised by Revision Description of Change
Number Number Date
1 All J. Drasny 03/04/2019 Incorporation of FMS to align with Common Management System
2 All R Williams 07/24/2020 Change to document owners
3 All C Nolan 05/11/2021 Change to document owners

3. References
3.1 Honeywell Records and Information Management
3.2 Facilities Management System Documents
3.2.1 FMS 103 Aspects and Impacts
3.2.2 FMS 104 Compliance Obligations

FMS 106 Management of Change

June 7, 2018
© Honeywell Proprietary and Confidential
CAUTION: Copy printed on Dec. 27, 2022.
Page 2 of 2

Honeywell Internal