Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3
ISIJ International, Vol. 59 (2019), No. 3, pp. 504–513
Guangtao LI,* Dianyao GONG, Xing LU, Zhenhua WANG and Dianhua ZHANG
The State Key Laboratory of Rolling and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110819 China.
(Received on October 2, 2018; accepted on November 5, 2018; J-STAGE Advance published date:
December 19, 2018)
The phenomenon of uneven contact pressures between cylindrical backup roll and CVC (Continuously
Variable Crown) work roll in four-high hot strip mill has always existed, which can lead to seriously uneven
wear of cylindrical backup roll and even spalling defect. In order to obtain an available solution plan for
above mentioned problem, a new kind of backup roll contour called reverse CVC backup roll contour is
proposed in this paper. Reverse CVC backup roll contour is generated by fitting four cubic chamfer con-
tours and one backup roll surface contour designed by CVC work roll contour. And one roll elastic defor-
mation simulating software coded based on Influence Function Method has been used to calculate and
study the contact pressure distributions between CVC work roll and reverse CVC contour backup roll or
cylindrical contour backup roll. Compared with cylindrical contour backup roll, contact pressures between
CVC work roll and reverse CVC contour backup roll are much smoother without steep peak. Simulating
results meet well with data collected from the application field, wear of new reverse CVC contour backup
roll is more well-distributed than cylindrical contour backup roll.
KEY WORDS: backup roll contour; CVC work roll; backup roll wear; contact pressure.
reverse CVC contour backup roll was designed according lower roll surface contour is described as Eq. (6). In the
to CVC work roll equivalent contour. And CVC work roll same way, lower and upper roll surface contours of bottom
equivalent contour was derived based on CVC work roll reverse CVC contour backup roll are respectively described
contour. as Eqs. (7) and (8).
The CVC work roll contour of certain 1 780 mm hot roll-
yub1 ( x ) K1 ( x s ) K 2 ( x s )2 K 3 ( x s )3 + Q .... (5)
ing line has been shown in Fig. 3. Upper and bottom CVC
work roll contours are respectively described as:
yub 2 ( x ) yub1 ( x ) ........................... (6)
yu1 ( x ) K1 x K 2 x K 3 x Q ........... (1)
2 3
ybb1 ( x ) K1 ( L x s ) K 2 ( L x s )2
........ (7)
yb1 ( x ) K1 ( L x ) K 2 ( L x ) K 3 ( L x ) W ..... (2)
2 3
K 3 ( L x s )3 W
Fig. 4. CVC work roll equivalent contours for a) upper work roll
Fig. 3. CVC work roll contours. and b) bottom work roll.
Parameters Values
Parameters Values
Parameters Values
As displayed in Figs. 9–11, contact pressure distributions are very uneven with obvious contact pressure peaks, espe-
between CVC work roll and R-CVC 1, R-CVC 2, R-CVC cially the large and steep contact pressure peaks in the right
3 or cylindrical contour backup roll at different CVC work side. The uneven contact pressure distributions will lead to
roll shifting positions have been obtained respectively. seriously uneven wear on cylindrical backup roll, and the
Shifting positions include 0 mm, ±50 mm, +100 mm, +120 calculation results meet well with the actual wear contour
mm. displayed in Fig. 2. In addition, the large and steep contact
pressure peak appearing at the end of cylindrical roll will
3.3. Analysis of Calculation Results generate local stress concentration. And spalling defect is
Figures 9–11 have shown that the difference of roll probably caused by the large stress concentration. Com-
contour design and the change of roll shifting position pared with cylindrical contour backup roll, contact pressure
will cause the difference of contact pressure distributions distributions of reverse CVC contour backup roll are more
between rolls. A good design of backup roll contour will uniform without steep and large contact pressure peaks. The
result in the uniform contact pressure distributions in the contact pressure peaks of reverse CVC contour backup roll
strip rolling process. As shown in Figs. 9–11, the contact appear at the contact zone between strip and work roll. So,
pressure distributions of cylindrical contour backup roll the harmful contact zone will be reduced or even eliminated
Fig. 9. Contact pressure distributions of R-CVC 1 and cylindrical roll at different shifting positions for a)–e) each rep-
resentative shifting positions and f) all given shifting positions.
Fig. 10. Contact pressure distributions of R-CVC 2 and cylindrical roll at different shifting positions for a)–e) each
representative shifting positions and f) all given shifting positions.
for reverse CVC contour backup roll. Except for the influence of contact pressure peak, the
In order to furtherly study the performance of each reverse holistic contact pressure distributions will directly affect
CVC contour, specific contact pressure peaks between CVC the wear of backup roll. So, holistic contact pressure distri-
work roll and backup rolls with different contours at the butions of different backup rolls are furtherly reflected by
work roll shifting positions of 0 mm, ± 50 mm, + 100 mm, calculating the standard deviation of contact pressures for
+ 120 mm have been obtained, which are shown in Table each backup roll contour at different CVC work roll shifting
5. Although the contact pressure peak of each reverse CVC positions, which is expressed as:
contour backup roll at + 120 mm is bigger than that of the
2
cylindrical one, the change of contact pressure peak for each 1 N 1 N
reverse CVC roll is gentler as displayed in Figs. 9–11 and SDk
N i 1
q k i
N i 1
qk i ........... (12)
the possibility of forming stress concentration is smaller.
Among reverse CVC contour backup rolls, R-CVC 1 has where SDk is standard deviation of contact pressures at CVC
maximum contact pressure peaks at − 50 mm and 0 mm, work roll shifting position of k, kN/mm; qk(i) is contact pres-
R-CVC 3 exists maximum contact pressure peaks at + 50 sure of i-th roll element at CVC work roll shifting position
mm, + 100 mm and + 120 mm. of k, kN/mm; N is the amount of roll elements.
Fig. 11. Contact pressure distributions of R-CVC 3 and cylindrical roll at different shifting positions for a)–e) each
representative shifting positions and f) all given shifting positions.
Table 5. Contact pressure peaks of different contour backup rolls are all smaller compared with the cylindrical roll. Although
at different shifting positions. standard deviations of R-CVC 3 at shifting position + 50
Shifting position [mm] −50 0 +50 +100 +120 mm, + 100 mm and + 120 mm is bigger than that of cylin-
drical roll, the mean standard deviation value of R-CVC 3 is
Cylindrical 22.847 21.725 20.39 19.33 18.898
Contact smaller than cylindrical one. So, it can be obtained that new
pressure R-CVC 1 18.496 18.555 18.488 18.933 19.075 reverse CVC contour backup rolls are more beneficial to the
peaks R-CVC 2 18.428 18.473 18.513 18.938 19.278 holistic uniformity of contact pressure distributions. Among
[kN/mm]
R-CVC 3 18.419 18.372 18.695 19.199 19.335 reverse CVC contour backup rolls, the mean standard devia-
tion value of R-CVC 1 is smallest, oppositely, R-CVC 3 has
the largest mean standard deviation value. Thus, R-CVC 1
As shown in Table 6, the standard deviations of contact will have a more outstanding effect for holistic uniformity
pressures for each backup roll contour at different CVC work of contact pressure distributions.
roll shifting positions short for standard deviation in the fol- Based on above calculation results and analyses, reverse
lowing paragraphs have been obtained. Standard deviations CVC contour which is designed to solve the problem of
of R-CVC 1 and R-CVC 2 at different shifting positions uneven contact pressures between cylindrical backup roll
Table 6. Standard deviations of contact pressures at different shifting positions for different contour backup rolls.
and CVC work roll in four-high hot strip mill has obtained Table 7. The parameters of R-CVC 2.
the expectant effect. Compared with cylindrical backup Parameters Upper roll Bottom roll
roll, more uniform contact pressure distributions of reverse
High chromium High chromium
CVC contour backup rolls will be more beneficial to con- Material
steel steel
trol uneven wear and avoid spalling defects. To balance the
Diameter of operating side [mm] 1 470.450 1 471.344
effect between the holistic uniformity of contact pressure
described by standard deviation and contact pressure peak, Diameter of middle [mm] 1 471.133 1 471.767
R-CVC 2, which not only has the temperate mean standard Diameter of driving side [mm] 1 470.815 1 471.097
deviation value close to R-CVC 1 but also the temperate Accuracy of grinding [mm] ±0.01 ±0.01
contact pressure peaks, is the better one for further experi-
mental verification in the factory. Accuracy of contour [mm] ±0.001 ±0.001
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Key R&D Program
of China (2017YFB0304100), National Natural Science
Foundation of China (51704067, 51774084, 51634002).
REFERENCES
1) W. Bald, G. Beisemann, H. Feldmann and T. Schultes: Iron Steel
Eng., 64 (1987), 32.
2) C. Lu, A. K. Tieu and Z. Y. Jiang: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 125
(2002), 645.
3) X. M. Zhang, Z. Y. Jiang, A. K. Tieu, X. H. Liu and G. D. Wang: J.
Mater. Process. Technol., 130 (2002), 219.
4) F. Shang, H. B. Li, N. Kong, J. Zhang, C. Hu, C. Zhang, J. F. Chen
and D. R. G. Mitchell: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 90 (2017), 2723.
5) X. D. Wang, F. Li, B. H. Li, L. J. Dong and B. H. Zhang: ISIJ Int.,
52 (2012), 1637.
6) R. Servin-Castañeda, A. M. Garcia-Lara, R. D. Mercado-Solís and C.
A. Vega-Lebrun: J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 21 (2014), 46.
7) Q. Dong, J. G. Cao, H. B. Li, Y. S. Zhou, T. L. Yan and W. Z. Wang:
Steel Res. Int., 86 (2015), 129.
8) D. F. Chang: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 94 (1999), 45.
Fig. 13. Comparisons of contours of R-CVC 2 for a) upper 9) X. F. Qin, D. L. Sun, L. Y. Xie and Q. Wu: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 600
R-CVC 2 and b) bottom R-CVC 2. (2014), 195.
10) M. Jelali: Control Performance Management in Industrial Automa-
tion: Assessment, Diagnosis and Improvement of Control Loop
(Thicknesses are 1–4 mm and widths are 1 250–1 630 mm), Performance, Springer-Verlag, London, (2013), 414.
11) V. R. Singh: Aluminium Rolling: Processes, Principles and Applica-
as well as the influence of centralized CVC work roll shift- tions, Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, (2011), 399.
ing position, the result that the wear of R-CVC 2 compared 12) M. Morel and M. Bosch: Iron Steel Eng., 27 (1992), 74.
with cylindrical contour backup roll is more well-distributed 13) T. Masui, J. Yamada, T. Nagai and T. Nishino: Trans. Iron Steel Inst.
Jpn., 23 (1983), 846.
has been obtained. So, it is concluded that the application 14) A. Tomizawa, S. Inoue and T. Masui: Variable-Crown Roll, U. S.
of reverse CVC backup roll contour is successful and the Patent No. 5007152, (1991).
15) V. B. Ginzburg and R. Ballas: Flat Rolling Fundamentals, CRC Press,
expected application effect has been achieved. New York, (2000), 731.
16) J. G. Cao, G. C. Wei, J. Zhang, X. L. Chen and Y. Z. Zhou: J. Cent.
South Univ. Technol., 15 (2008), 264.
5. Conclusions 17) X. D. Wang, F. Li, B. H. Li, G. S. Zhu, B. Li and B. H. Zhang:
Ironmaking Steelmaking, 37 (2010), 633.
In order to solve the problem of uneven contact pressures 18) X. L. Chen, Q. Yang, Q. D. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. B. Cui, L. Guo,
between CVC work roll and cylindrical backup roll in four- H. Liu, D. K. Yang, L. J. Xu and Y. H. Xu: Steel Technol. Int., 96
(1995), 174.
high hot strip mill, a new kind of backup roll contour called 19) Q. Yang, X. L. Chen, Y. L. Xu and L. J. Xu: Iron Steel, 30 (1995),
reverse CVC backup roll contour is proposed. 48 (in Chinese).
20) A. R. He, Q. Yang, X. L. Chen and L. Zhao: Chin. J. Mech. Eng.
(1) Reverse CVC backup roll contour is designed by (Engl. Ed.), 21 (2008), 103.
fitting four cubic chamfer contours and one roll surface con- 21) J. Shao, B. Li, A. R. He, W. Q. Sun, Z. B. Liu and J. Zhou: Open
tour derived based on CVC work roll contour. And reverse Autom. Control Syst. J., 7 (2015), 93.
22) G. M. Liu, Y. G. Li, Q. X. Huang and X. Yang: Math. Probl. Eng.,
CVC backup roll contour is expressed by the sixth-order 2018 (2018), 1.
polynomial curve. 23) K. N. Shohet and N. A. Townsend: J. Iron Steel Inst., 206 (1968),
1088.
(2) Compared with cylindrical contour backup roll, 24) Y. Tozawa and T. Ishikawa: Mem. Fac. Eng. Nagoya Univ., 36
contact pressure distributions between CVC work roll (1984), 79.
and reverse CVC contour backup roll are much smoother 25) V. Salganik: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 125 (2002), 695.
26) Y. L. Liu and W. H. Lee: ISIJ Int., 45 (2005), 1173.
without steep peak, which is beneficial to make the wear 27) Z. Y. Jiang, H. T. Zhu and A. K. Tieu: J. Mater. Process. Technol.,
of backup roll become more well-distributed and decrease 162 (2005), 512.
28) Z. Y. Jiang, H. T. Zhu and A. K. Tieu: J. Mater. Process. Technol.,
the possibility of forming stress concentration. And shape 140 (2003), 535.
control ability can be improved because of the reduction or 29) Z. Y. Jiang and A. K. Tieu: Wear, 263 (2007), 1447.