Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diana Chiciorea-Martinescu
In sports, when seeking performance, students need 1. a good way of learning to achieve the
knowledge, 2. a method to memorize knowledge, and 3. the best skills for the executory
function. Besides that, we often debate if talent or hard-working matters most. But because we
stick with the age group of 4-7/8 years old, we will consider talent more important, as kids’ job is
actually to play, and they are doing it almost effortlessly. A good way of learning implies a
proper learning theory applied in the proper situation. Acquiring skills for a sport is a process
that demands desire, free will, and responsibility. The young learner has to understand very well
the whole process of recreating it during the games. It is a conscious process that involves many
cognitive abilities. It is easy to seek only for this and to totally eliminate some methods that can
set up unconscious. But even in this first step of learning, some exercises can be learned by
reinforcing a behavior or making associations.
The second step is crucial in this debate, as we are talking about memorizing but not so much
analyzing or reinterpreting the knowledge due to the early age. Here, imitation and MKO (more
knowledgeable other) theory are much involved. Of course, memory demands important
cognitive processes, but it can also be easily set up using reinforcement.
The last act should be the creative one: the execution and the putting in the action of what the
player has learned. The way he learned to do that is crucial in the way he is doing it. When
speaking about talent, we also speak not only about an inner motivation but a certain self-control
and an instinct. But here, timing and reaction speed are very important. Also, because we speak
about kids, refocusing is an issue, and it also needs to be regained rapidly. These are cognitive
processes by definition, but could we still use some unconscious learned behaviors to improve
performance?
Behaviorism is one of the oldest theories of learning, developed in the middle of the 19th century.
Pavlov observed his dog’s behavior after repeating a conditional stimulus: the dog associated the
stimuli with a certain behavior. Later on, operant conditioning involved benevolent behavior in
getting a certain reward. So, making associations is a way to acquire and apply knowledge faster,
and timing is essential in competitions.
In the executory step of playing soccer, players must have a good reaction time, good timing
with their mates, and efficient attention. All these can be trained and stimulated using classical
conditioning, with different stimuli the coach uses, such as body language, voice tone, or even
clothes. Operant conditioning is also present, as others’ joy and pleasure are also considered
good rewards. Also, fear, body control against freezing, and certain emotions can be trained to be
controlled using some stimuli.
To gain good results, self-control and good reaction time are crucial. Self-control can protect a
player from negative emotions like fear: the fear of a stronger opponent, the fear of criticism, the
fear of losing the ball, or the fear of losing the game itself. Fear itself is a learned behavior when
we speak about the fear of criticism or of losing a game. But the fear of a stronger opponent is
that kind of innate fear that helped us survive as a specie. Even if game plays are organized
under strict rules like respecting the age of players, there are certain situations when a player can
meet a stronger one. Naturally, because of the fear, he will stand out and lose the ball in order not
to be injured. Actually, the intervention of behavioral skills training (BST) to diminish injuries
was demonstrated if using (Quintero, 2018). But by using reinforcement in training, a kid can
develop less fear in this kind of situation. If he learns that even chased by a stronger opponent,
nothing bad can happen or that opponent is only tall but not necessarily strong, with the help of
the classical conditioning theory.
When talking about 5-6-7-year-old kids, maintaining their focus is a big challenge. They can be
easily disrupted by everything: the noises around them, the voices of their parents, the other
players from the field, and even the coach talking with a team player. Maintaining them focused
is mainly correlated with attention. Using the spatial theory of attention, we can consider the ball
as being the spotlight. (Teoldo et al., 2017) So, the focus can remain on the spotlight, but still, the
player should be able to get other instructions from the coach.
For kids is not an easy task to remain focused, and their attention can be easily distracted. For
instance, their parents’ voices are very emotional stimuli for them and can gain their attention
effortlessly. Of course, parents think their encouragements or observations can help the player,
but the reality is that parents only offer a huge distraction and defocusing.
A way to use behaviorist methods in gaining the focus is to always use white or fluorescent color
t-shirts both in training and in the gameplay. During training, players can reinforce their ability
to focus on their playmates.
When learning mechanisms imply that information must be processed and recreated, it means
that cognitive processes are involved. Cognitivism is a very extended learning theory with many
subdivisions. But the question is about when the brain is developed enough for such cognitive
operations. Is it a 7-year-old kid capable of understanding an exercise in the training and
recreating it in the gameplay? Can he apply the exercise in his own manner, or is he more likely
to imitate his coach’s moves? Well, even if we showed above the fact that imitation is crucial in
the youth soccer learning process, there are still some methods of acquiring skills that involve
some complex cognitive operations. Connectivism is one of them, and it is a quite new learning
theory. The basic idea is that students should make connections to better understand and learn.
It can easily be applied when teaching team sports, as the team is the core of the activity. Players
must understand the role of the others for a better understanding of their role. Considering the
Piagetian egocentric mode, toddlers are in this preoperational phase (Piaget, 1964), the
connectivism can be a real help in understanding their mates’ points of view. But the connection
with the coach is also important, and it is considered good practice having even a good physical
connection with the kids, like pats on the back, on their heads, or tieing the shoelaces. So, no
matter the theory applied, the’s a certitude: the relation with the coach must be great to seek a
good performance (Amorose, 2007; Horn, 2002).
Training involves many exercises meant to be used in the gameplays. If a part of the learning
process of the exercise may fit better in a behaviorist method, putting it into practice involves
creativity, logic, and reorganization of the knowledge. The child must be able to take an exercise
learned in an isolated situation (during the training) and put it in a context (the gameplay). More
than that, he must be able to communicate with his mates, to pass the ball or to receive it.
Anticipating his mate’s moves is the desired endpoint in training. It is well known that at this
age, kids communicate very well using body language, gestures, and mimics. For this, it seems
that introvert coaches have better results in the group age of 4-7, while extrovert coaches explain
better to 7-13 old years kids.
6. Conclusions
Both observations from the field and the coach’s opinions agree on the fact that body language is
very important when training youth soccer. Another aspect is that imitating is the first step in the
process of acquiring skills. But imitating the coach’s movements doesn’t imply the fact that the
player’s creativity will vanish. More than this, using reinforced behavior can help them with
better focusing and executing the indications of the coach much faster.
7. Bibliography
Amorose, A. J. (2007). Coaching effectiveness: Exploring the relationship between coaching
behavior and self-determined motivation. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis
(Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport (pp. 209–227,347–351).
Human Kinetics
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing
critical features from an instructional design perspective. Perform. Improv. Q. 26, 43–71. DOI:
10.1002/piq.21143
Horn, T.S. (2002) Coaching Effectiveness in the Sport Domain. In: Horn, T.S., Ed., Advances in
Sport Psychology, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 309–354.
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: cognitive development in children: piaget development and learning. J.
Res. Sci. Teach. 2, 176–186. DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660020306
Quintero, Laura, "Behavioral Skills Training to Teach Correct Heading Skills to Youth Soccer
Players" (2018). Master's Theses. 362.
Teoldo, I., Guilherme, J., and Garganta, J. (2017). Training Football for Smart Playing: On
Tactical Performance of Teams and Players. Curitiba: Editora Appris.
Williams, A. M., Hodges, N. J., North, J. S., & Barton, G. (2006). Perceiving patterns of play in
dynamic sport tasks: investigating the essential information underlying skilled
performance. Percept. Lon. 35:317. DOI: 10.1068/p5310