Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Source: Adapted from Isabelle Maignan, O.C. Ferrell, and Linda Ferrell, “A Stakeholder Model for Implementing
Social Responsibility in Marketing,” European Journal of Marketing 39 (2005): 956-977. Used with permission.
A Stakeholder orientation
1. There is nothing wrong in providing a legal service many people desire, and those that hack the site
to close it down should be punished.
2. From a stakeholder perspective, it is wrong to provide socially irresponsible services, and those who
hacked the site to have it shut down were providing a public service
Social responsibility and ethics
Source: Adapted from Archie B. Carroll, “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Business Horizons (July-
August 1991): 42, Figure 3
Corporate Citizenship
Shareholder rights
Board composition
Financial oversight
Risk management
Board engagement and communication
Link between executive compensation and
performance
CEO and executive succession
Board oversight of company talent
development
Ethics and compliance programs
Pakistan’s Code of Corporate
Governance (CCG, 2019)
Shareholder model
Founded in classic economic precepts, including the
maximization of wealth for investors and owners
Stakeholder model
Adopts a broader view of the purpose of business that
includes satisfying the concerns of other stakeholders, from
employees, suppliers, and government regulators to
communities and special interest groups
Because of limited resources, companies must determine which
of their stakeholders are primary.
Ultimate responsibility for their firms’ success or failure, as well as for the
ethics of their actions
Increased demands for accountability and transparency
Directors are chosen for their expertise, competence, and ability to bring
diverse perspectives to strategic discussions.
Outside directors are thought to bring more independence to the monitoring
function.
Many of the corporate scandals uncovered in recent years might have
been prevented if each of the companies’ boards of directors had been
better qualified, more knowledgeable, and less biased.
The concept of board members being linked to more than one company is
known as interlocking directorate. The practice is legal unless it involves a
direct competitor.
Issues of executive compensation
Issues of Executive
Compensation
More time spent discussing compensation than ensuring
the integrity of the firm’s financial reporting systems.
Most recent financial meltdown and high bonuses for
executives of failed firms re-ignited the public debate over
compensation issues.
The topic receives much attention in the media, sparks
shareholder concern, and is hotly debated in discussions of
corporate governance.
One area for board members to consider is the extent to
which executive compensation is linked to company
performance.
Issues related to high compensation are excessive risk-
taking, a focus on short-term financial performance, and
reduced transparency at the expense of long-term growth.
Implementing a
Stakeholder Perspective
Step 1: Assessing the corporate culture
a social responsibility program must align with the
corporate culture of the organization.
Step 2: Identifying stakeholder groups
it is important to recognize stakeholder groups and their
needs, wants, and desires.
Step 3: Identifying stakeholder issues
involves understanding the nature of the main issues of
concern to primary stakeholders
Implementing a
Stakeholder Perspective
Step 4: Assessing organizational commitment to social
responsibility
Brings previous three steps together to arrive at an
understanding of social responsibility that specifically
matches the organization of interest.
Step 5: Identifying resources and determining urgency
prioritization of stakeholders and issues, along with the
assessment of past performance, provides guidance for
allocating resources.
Step 6: Gaining stakeholder feedback
Satisfaction or reputation surveys
stakeholder-generated media (blogs, websites, podcasts,
and newsletters)
Formal research using focus groups, observation, and
surveys
World’s most ethical
companies 2022
Ethisphere, a global leader in defining and advancing
the standards of ethical business practices, announced
the 136 honorees representing 22 countries and 45
industries that have earned the coveted designation
of World’s Most Ethical Companies® in 2022.
This is the 16th annual recognition of companies that
have demonstrated a commitment to ethical business
practices through programs that positively impact
employees, communities, and broader stakeholders,
and contribute to sustainable and profitable long-term
business performance.
https://worldsmostethicalcompanies.com/honorees/
100 Best corporate
citizens (2022)
Now more than ever, corporate leadership on environmental,
social and governance (ESG) issues is imperative. And so is
transparency.
As companies decarbonize, align with the Sustainable
Development Goals and rebuild an equitable economy post-
pandemic, they must be open about their efforts.
Each year, 3BL Media evaluates the largest public U.S.
companies on ESG transparency and performance.
https://100best.3blmedia.com/