FMEA Check list / Report

Project
Date: Kind of Design System
Moderation: FMEA: Design Sub-System
Design Component
Supplier: FMEA contact person: Design Interfaces
(Name, address)

System/Subsystem/Compont/Process:

Participants Kautex-Textron: Participants Supplier:

1 System description
Angabe in % Max Status
1.1 Is a Block Diagram (Boundary Diagram) available 1

1.2 Have the system boundarys and system influances been described sufficiently 1

1.3 Have the components within the System been termed sufficiently 1

1.4 Have the interfaces between the components and to outside been termed sufficiently 1

1.5 Have the relations between all components and interfaces been termed sufficiently 1

2 FMEA Header

2.1 Have Dates (Orig./Revision) and Numbering / File No. been fixed 1

2.2 Has a cross-functional team (department) been selected 2

Has a team leader been defined

2.3 Has the design responsibility been defined 1

2.4 Has the vehicle / model year been termed 1

3 Functions

3.1 Have functions been defined clearly: verb, noun, with measurables 3

3.2 Have all functions been listed completely 5

Have all requirements, specifications (design and process), drawings been
considered in the function definition

3.3 Have all functions proposed in the Kautex-Textron Matrix been considered 2

4 Potential Failures

4.1 Have all pot. failures been listed separately 5

4.2 Have all types of failure modes been considered 5

no function
partial function
intermitten function
unintended function
function degraded over time

12/30/2022 Editor: Heese / Piechatzek 1 FMEA Scheckliste

 FMEA Check list / Report

5 Potential Effect of Failure

5.1 Have all pot. effects of failure been identified regarding: 5

Safety, legal requirements, environment, next higher system, customer, end-user

6 Potential Causes of Failure

6.1 Have all pot. causes of failure been identified 15

6.2 Has every pot. cause of failure been listed and assessed separately 5

7 Current Design Controls

7.1 Have preventions and detections been listed separately 2

7.1 Have preventisons been identified sufficiently for each pot. cause of failure 7

7.2 Has the occurence been rated > 6, when no preventions have been identified 2

7.3 Have detections been identified sufficiently for each pot. Cause of failure 7

7.4 Has the detection been rated with 10, when no detections have been identified 2

8 Ratings

8.1 Have Sev., Occur. and Detec. been rated completely 3

8.2 Have Sev., Occur. and Detec. been rated according to the rating tables of 1
QS9000, VDA4.2 or Kautex-Textron

8.3 Are all RPNs complete 1

9 Recommended Actions:

9.1 Have recommended actions been defined sufficently to minimize 10

the risks in the design

9.2 Have completion dates and responsibilities been defined for each 2
recommended action

9.3 Have recommended actions been finalized and the RPNs revised 3

10 Critical and Significant Characteristics

10.1 Have potential critical and/or significant characteristics been identified 2

and marked in the FMEA

10.2 Have the characteristics been identified according to traceable rules 3

Status in % 0
Comments

12/30/2022 Editor: Heese / Piechatzek 2 FMEA Scheckliste