Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E-Mail:postbox@vnrvjiet.in website:vnrvjiet.ac.in
DEPARTMENT OF
MANUAL
VNR VIGNANA JYOTHI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF E.E.E
DEPARTMENT OF E.E.E
Machine.
Aim:-
Theory:
IDMT relay is an Inverse Definite Minimum Time relay. It is one in which
Time of operation is inversely proportional to magnitude of fault current near
pickup value and becomes substantially constant slightly above the pickup
value of the Relay. This is achieved by using the core of Electro Magnet
which gets saturated for currents slightly greater than the pickup current.
This relay consists of an Induction disc unit with an operation indicator and
in some cases an instantaneous high set unit all are assembled in a standard
frame. Disc shaft carries silver rod moving contacts which complete the
auxiliary unit circuit through the fixed contact. Permanent magnet is used to
control the disc speed. The setting is adjusted by the movement of the back
stop which is controlled by rotating a KNUR LED molded disc at the base of
graduated time multiplier.
Fault current and measured relay operating time is used to conduct the
experiment. Values will be recorded for various TSMs and PSMs.
Characteristics will be studied with the help of a graph and correlated with
theory.
Circuit Diagram:
Model graphs:-
Theory:
Under Voltage/Over Voltage Relay is an electronic microcontroller
based single-phase voltage relay. It is suitable for under/over voltage
protection schemes in LV, MV and HV power distribution systems. It is
also suitable for over voltage protection of AC circuits, capacitors,
machines such as generators, synchronous motor and under voltage
protection of AC circuits, Induction motors, automatic change over
schemes etc.
The microcontroller-based design offers a wide range of Trip-Time
characteristics, under voltage or over voltage mode and PT rating (110V,
240V, 415V), which can all be selected in the field at the time of
commissioning. It accepts very wide auxiliary supply range.
Relay is designed for flush mounting. It is very compact in size, which
results in saving of panel space. Its draw-out construction makes
installation and maintenance very easy.
8
Circuit Diagrams:
Model Graph:
Result:
Review Questions:
11
Finding the Sequence Impedances of a Cylindrical rotor
Synchronous Machine
Aim: To find Positive, Negative and Zero sequence impedances of given
three phase Cylindrical rotor Synchronous Machine.
Name Plate details :
Alternato
Parameter DC Motor r
Rated Power
Rated voltage
Rated speed
Rated Field current
Rated Armature current
Apparatus:
S. No Equipment Type Range Qty
1 Auto transformer 3-phase AC
2 Auto transformer 1-phase AC
2 3-point starter -
3 Rectifier -
4 Rectifier -
5 Voltmeter MC, Digital
6 Ammeter MC, Digital
7 Ammeter MC, Digital
8 Voltmeter MI, Digital
9 Ammeter MI, Digital
10 Voltmeter MC, Digital
11 3-Phase Alternator - -
DC Motor set
12
Theory: The positive, Negative and Zero sequence impedances of rotating
machines are generally different. The +ve sequence impedance of
Synchronous generator is equal to the Synchronous impedance of the
machine. Experimental set up to conduct OCC and SCC is made available.
With the help of observations Synchronous impedance can be calculated.
The –ve sequence impedance is much less than +ve Sequence impedance.
The zero sequence impedance is a variable item and if its value is not given,
it may be assumed to be equal to the +ve sequence impedance. For Zero
sequence impedance a separate model is used to conduct of experiment.
CIRCUIT DIAGRAMS:
(A) POSITIVE SEQUENCE IMPEDANCE:
S.C Test
If(A) Isc (A)
V2 (V) Ia2(A)
V0 (V) Ia0(A)
Z0 = Vao/Iao Ω
16
Model graph:
Result:
Review Questions:
1. Define +ve, -ve, Zero sequence impedances.
2. Why are they different for Alternators?
3. Can we analyze an unbalanced system otherwise?
4. Out of all the reactance of synchronous machine which one is lowest?
5. What is the typical value of zero sequence reactance in per unit per
large rating salient pole alternator?
17
Finding the sequence impedances of 3- phase Transformer
Aim: To find Positive, Negative and Zero sequence impedances of given
three phase transformer.
Name Plate details :
Parameter Transformer
Rated kVA
Primary voltage
Primary current
Secondary voltage
Secondary current
Apparatus:
S. No Equipment Type Range Qty
1 Auto transformer 3-phase AC
2 Transformer 3-phase AC
3 Ammeter MI, Digital
4 Voltmeter MI, Digital
5 Connecting probes
Theory:
Since Transformers have the same impedance with reversed phase
rotation, their +ve and –ve sequence impedances are equal. This value
being equal to the impedance of the Transformer. However, Zero
sequence impedance depends upon the Earth connection. If there is a
through Circuit for the earth current, zero sequence impedance will be
equal to the +ve sequence impedance otherwise it will be infinite. Lab
experiment is planned to find out sequence impedances by creation of
faults at secondary suitably and measure impedances. Proper care is
taken to ensure readings would not damage the equipment.
18
Circuit Diagrams:
V
Z0
3I
Tabular
form:
Network V (V) I (A) Z (Ω)
Positive
sequence
Zero sequence
Precautions:-
• All secondary windings should be shorted in zero sequence
impedance measurement.
Result:
Review Questions:
1. Define Sequence Impedances.
2. Explain symmetrical components method.
3. Why +ve, -ve sequence impedances are same for a transformer?
20
Differential Protection of Single Phase Transformer
Aim: To conduct differential protection scheme on a single phase
transformer with unequal turn’s ratio
Name Plate details :
Parameter Value
Rated kVA
Primary voltage
Primary current
Secondary voltage
Secondary current
Apparatus:
S. No Equipment Type Range Qty
1 Auto transformer
2 Transformer
3 Current Transformer
4 Current Transformer
5 OC Relay
6 PSM
7 TSM
8 Ammeter
9 Ammeter
10 Ammeter
11 Ammeter
12 Voltmeter
13 Voltmeter
14 Rheostat
15 Resistive Load
16 Connecting probes
21
Theory :
A Differential relay responds to vector difference between two or more
similar electrical quantities. From this definition the Differential relay
has at least two actuating quantities say 1-1 and 2-1. The actuating
quantities should be same.
Ex: Current/Current.
The Relay responds to vector difference between 1-1 & 2-1 which
includes magnitude and/or phase angle difference. Differential protection
is generally unit protection. The protection zone is exactly determined by
location of CTs. The vector difference is actuated by suitable connection
of CTs or PTs secondaries. Most of differential relays are current
differential relays in which vector difference between current entering
the winding & current leaving the winding is used for relay operation.
Differential protection is used for protection of Generators, Transformers
etc. Internal fault is created using switch and relay operation observed for
various TSMs. Relay operations for external faults can also be studied.
Circuit Diagram:
External Fault:
6. Now create an external fault by applying load with Load MCBs(L 1 to
L4) and External Fault MCBs(EF1, EF2) sequentially, check whether
the relay operates or not and note down the currents
7. Open all MCBs once the relay is operated.
Internal Fault:
8. Now create an internal fault by closing the switch 'S' and applying
load with Load MCBs and Internal Fault MCBs(IF 1, IF2) sequentially,
check whether the relay operates or not and note down the currents
9. Open switch 'S' and MCBs.
10. Bring the auto transformer to minimum output position and Switch
OFF Mains MCB
Tabular forms:
For External Fault: Vp = Vs=
S.No Load Primary Secondary Relay Relay
applied current current current operates/
(A) (A) (A) doesn’t operate
23
For Internal Fault: Vp = Vs=
S.No Load applied Primary Secondary Internal Relay Relay
current current Fault current operates/
(A) (A) current (A) doesn’t operate
(A)
Precautions:
PSM must be changed with due care.
Result:
Review Questions:
1. Why non-identical CTs are used in this scheme.
2. How would you take into account CT imbalances.
3. What do you understand by internal fault.
4. What do you understand by External fault.
24
Determination of Voltage Distribution and String Efficiency
in Suspension Insulator
Aim: To determine voltage distribution and string efficiency of suspension
insulator with and without guard ring.
Apparatus:
S. No Equipment Type Range Qty
1 Auto transformer
2 Voltmeter
3 Capacitors
4 Capacitors
5 Capacitors
6 Connecting Probes
Theory:
String efficiency is an important factor in the design of insulators. Without
proper design the disc closer to the power line gets stressed up and there will
be unequal voltage distribution. An insulator is simulated with capacitances.
No of Capacitances can be varied. Theoretical values and practical values are
compared to understand the concepts and correctness of results. Experiment
with Guard ring also may be conducted.
To improve string efficiency the following methods are used.
1. Selection of ratio of mutual capacitance to Capacitance to ground.
A larger value of m is preferred.
2. Grading of units
3. Static shielding by using a Guard ring or grading ring.
Formula Used:
String efficiency = Voltage across the string
---------------------------------
n* voltage across the unit near the power
conductor Where n = number units in a series string.
25
Circuit Diagram:
Fig. 1 Circuit diagram for Suspension Insulator without and with guard ring
Procedure:
1. Connect the circuit as shown in Fig. 1
2. Keeping auto transformer in minimum output position; switch ON
MCB
3. Apply voltage in steps of 10V starting from 30V up to 60 V across the
series string
4. Measure the voltage across each unit and Insulator string
5. Calculate the string efficiency without guard ring
6. Repeat the steps 1 to 4 with guard ring
7. Compare theoretical and practical values
Tabular form:
(i) Without Guard Ring:
E η
E E1 E2 E3 E4 Total String
Theoretical Calculations:
Comparison of String efficiency:
String efficiency Practical Theoretical
without guard ring
with guard ring
Result:
Review Questions:
1. What is String Efficiency?
2. What are the methods of equalizing Voltage Distribution?
27
Measurement of Capacitance of 3-Core Cable
Aim: To measure core to core capacitance, core to earth capacitance and
charging Current in three core underground cable.
Apparatus: -
1. Three core cable
2. LCR Meter
Theory:- The capacitance of a cable system is much more important than
that of overhead line of the same length firstly due to the narrow spacing
between two conductors themselves and between the conductors and earthed
sheath secondly due to their separation by a dielectric medium of higher
permittivity as compared to air.
Fig. 1 shows a system of capacitances in a three core belted cable used for
three-phase system. Since potential difference exists between pairs of
conductors and between each conductor and the sheath, electrostatic fields
are set up in the cable. These electrostatic fields give rise to core – core
three Cc are delta connected where as the three C e are star connected, the
sheath forming the star point as shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 3 can be reduced to Fig.
4.
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
Where Ceq = 3 Cc.
28
Therefore, the whole cable is equivalent to three star connected
capacitors each of capacitance CN as shown Fig. 5.
Where CN = CE + Cc * 3
If Vph is the phase voltage, then charging current
Ic = Vph/ Capacitive reactance per phase= 2 II f Vph CN
Functional diagrams:
C C C
1 2 3
Result:
Review Questions:
Measure capacitance, Inductance of Transmission line model and
Compare the values.
30
Study of CT and PT
1. Aim:- To determine the percentage ratio error and the phase angle error of
the given current transformer by comparison with another
current transformer whose error are known.
2. Apparatus:-
3. Circuit diagram:-
31
4. Theory:-
S RS θS
X RS θS
The primaries of the two CT are connected in series and the current through
them is say Ip. The pressure coil of the two wattmeters are supplied with a
constant voltage V from a phase shifting transformer. The current coil of
wattmeter W1is connected to S through an ammeter.
32
Where V pcq is the voltage from the phase shifting transformer , which is
in quadrature with the Iss in current coil of W1. Then the phase of the voltage
w1 ρ VIss
w2 ρ VSI sin(θx − θs)
= V I ss − IsxCos(θx − θs)
= VI ss − VIsxCos(θx − θs)
= VI ss − VIsxCos(θx − θs)
= W1 ρ − VIsxCos(θx − θs)
. As(θx − θs) ∼ 0
∴VIsx W1 ρ − W2 ρ
Ip
RX
Isx
Ip
RS
Iss
R X Iss VIss W1 ρ
RS Isx VIsx W1 pW2 ρ
−1
1 W2 ρ
R
−
1 − W2 ρ Wρ
x R
s
1
Rs 1
W1 ρ
W2 ρ
Rs 1
W1 ρ
33
Now to obtain the phase angle errors
W2 q
Sin(θ X − θ S )
VIsx
W1 p − W2 ρ
Cos(θ X − θ S )
VIsx
Tan((θ X − θ S ) W2 Q
W1 ρ − W2 ρ
W2 θ
orθ X θsradius
W1 ρ − W2 ρ
5. Procedure:-
The connections are made as per the circuit diagram. The burden box is
adjusted to have a suitable current I n.The phase angle adjusted using the
shifting transformer so that wattmeter W1 reads zero. The reading of the
other wattmeter (W2q) is noted. A phase shift of 90 0 is obtained by the phase
shifting transformer. The two wattmeter readings W1p and W2p are then
observed.
radians.
7. Calculations:-
Rs = θs=
8. Precautions:-
9. Result:-
10.Review Questions:-
1. What are the various other methods of CT’s ?
2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this method ?
3. Define nominal ratio How is it different from the actual ratio of a
CT?
4. Define burden in the case of a CT How is it expressed ?
5. What is the turns compensations and why is it used ?
6. What are the precautions to be considered in connecting a CT?
7. Why should the secondary of a CT never be open when the primary
is energized ?
35
8. What determines the currents in the primary and secondary sides of
a CT ? Why is a CT preferred for high current measurements
instead of using an ammeter with a shunt ?
Apparatus:
S. No Equipment Type Range Qty
1 Auto transformer
2 Auto transformer
3 3-point starter
4 Rectifier
5 Rectifier
6 Voltmeter
7 Ammeter
8 3-Phase Alternator -
DC Motor set
37
Circuit Diagrams:
L-L
L-L-G
Formulae:
L-G Fault:
Ia =3Ef/Z1+Z2+Z0 -------------------------- (1)
Where Ia is fault current
Ef is the voltage to which the machine is excited
Z1+Z2+Z0 are the positive, negative and zero sequence impedances of the
machine.
40
L-L Fault:
Ia1 = Ef/Z1+Z2
Ib = a2Ia1+aIa2; Ia2 = -Ia1 Where a2 = (-0.5-j0.866); a= (-0.5+j0.866)
LLG Fault:
V = V =V =E -I Z
a1 a2 a0 f a1 1
Ia1 = Ef/Z1+(Z2xZ0/Z2+Z0)
Ia2 = -Va2/Z2 ; Ia0= -Va0/Z0
Ib = a2Ia1+a Ia2+Ia0
Where a2 =(-0.5+j0.866) ; a=(-0.5+l0.866)
In = 3 Ia0 = Ib+IC
Ic = - Ib=aIa1-a2Ia1
Comparison of Fault current and voltage:
Type of I in Amps Ef in Volts
Fault Theoretical Practical Theoretical Practical
L-G
L-L
L-L-G
Result:
41
Determination of Xd And Xq of a Salient Pole Synchronous
Machine
Aim:-
Apparatus:-
DC motor Alternator
Voltage
Current
Power
Speed
Frequency
42
Theory:-
The synchronous machine with salient pole rotor has non-uniform air
gap due to which its reactance varies with rotor position, consequently the
salient pole machine has two axis of geometry.
Iq.
X d = X ad + X1
X q = X aq + X1
43
Circuit Diagram:-
Procedure:-
Observations:-
I a (min) =
I a (max) =
Va (min) =
Va (max) =
45
Calculations:-
X d = Va (max) / I a (min)
X q = Va (min) / I a (max)
Regulation:
V sin φ I a X a
tanψ ( + for Lagging, - for leading )
V cosφ I a Ra
I d I a Sinψ
I d I aCosψ
Eo VCosδ I q Ra I d X d (δ ψ − φ )
Eo − V
% Regulation = 100
V
Precautions:-
for k=1:nline
lp(k)=linedata(k,1);
lq(k)=linedata(k,2);
r(k)=linedata(k,3);
x(k)=linedata(k,4);
ysh(k)=linedata(k,5);
a(k)=linedata(k,6);
z(k)= r(k)+j*x(k);
y(k)=1/z(k);
end
ybus=zeros(nbus,nbus);
yln =zeros(nbus,nbus);
47
% PI METHOD FOR OFF-NOMINAL ADMITTANCE OF TRANSFORMER
for k=1:nline
2
ylp(k)=[1/(a(k)^2)-1/a(k)]*y(k); % ytc1 = [1/a - 1/a]*y
ylq(k)=[1-1/a(k)]*y(k); % ytc2 = [1 - 1/a]*y
y(k)=y(k)/a(k);
end
for k=1:nline
’
ybus(lp(k),lq(k))=ybus(lp(k),lq(k))-y(k); % Ypq = -ypq –ypq
ybus(lq(k),lp(k))=ybus(lp(k),lq(k)); % Yqp = Ypq
% Ypp =
ybus(lp(k),lp(k))=ybus(lp(k),lp(k))+y(k)+ylp(k)+0.5*j*ysh(k);
ybus(lq(k),lq(k))=ybus(lq(k),lq(k))+y(k)+ylq(k)+0.5*j*ysh(k);
end
ybus
OUTPUT :-
Y-BUS =
48
GAUSS-SEIDEL METHOD
Aim : To conduct Load Flow analysis for the given 4-Bus system using
Gauss-Seidel method
% Y-BUS FORMATION
clear;
clc;
basemva=100;
% n code v delta Pg Qg Pd Qd Qmin Qmax Qsh
busdata = [ 1 0 1.04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1.04 0 100 0 50 0 20 100 0
3 2 1.00 0 0 0 100 -50 0 0 0];
4 2 1.00 0 0 0 -30 10 0 0
% lp lq r x ysh tap
linedata =[ 1 2 0.05 0.15 0.0 1
1 3 0.1 0.3 0.0 1
2 3 0.15 0.45 0.0 1
2 4 0.1 0.3 0.0 1
3 4 0.05 0.15 0.0 1];
nline=length(linedata(:,1));
j=sqrt(-1);
i=sqrt(-1);
for k=1:nline
lp(k)=linedata(k,1);
lq(k)=linedata(k,2);
r(k)=linedata(k,3);
x(k)=linedata(k,4);
ysh(k)=linedata(k,5);
a(k)=linedata(k,6);
nbus=length(busdata(:,2));
z(k)= r(k)+j*x(k);
y(k)=1/z(k);
end
ybus=zeros(nbus,nbus);
yln =zeros(nbus,nbus);
49
% PI METHOD FOR OFF-NOMINAL ADMITTANCE OF TRANSFORMER
for k=1:nline
ylp(k)=[1/(a(k)^2)-1/a(k)]*y(k);
ylq(k)=[1-1/a(k)]*y(k);
y(k)=y(k)/a(k);
end
for k=1:nline
ybus(lp(k),lq(k))=ybus(lp(k),lq(k))-y(k);
ybus(lq(k),lp(k))=ybus(lp(k),lq(k));
ybus(lp(k),lp(k))=ybus(lp(k),lp(k))+y(k)+ylp(k)+0.5*j*ysh(k);
ybus(lq(k),lq(k))=ybus(lq(k),lq(k))+y(k)+ylq(k)+0.5*j*ysh(k);
end
% Load flow solution by Gauss-Seidel Method
nbus=length(busdata(:,1));
for n=1:nbus
bus(n)=busdata(n,1);
kb(n)=busdata(n,2);
vm(n)=busdata(n,3);
delta(n)=busdata(n,4);
Pg(n)=busdata(n,5);
Qg(n)=busdata(n,6);
Pd(n)=busdata(n,7);
Qd(n)=busdata(n,8);
Qmin(n)=busdata(n,9);
Qmax(n)=busdata(n,10);
Qsh(n)=busdata(n,11);
delta(n)=pi/180*delta(n);
e(n)=vm(n)*cos(delta(n))+j*vm(n)*sin(delta(n));
P(n)=(Pg(n)-Pd(n))/basemva; Q(n)=(Qg(n)-
Qd(n))/basemva;
S(n)=P(n)+j*Q(n);
dv(n)=0;
end
50
maxerror=0.1;
iter=0;
for n=1:nbus
vc(n)=0+0*j;
vnew(n)=0+0*j;
end
while (maxerror>0.00001 & iter<15)
for m=1:nbus
for n=1:nbus
yv(n)=0+0*j;
end
if kb(m)==0 % Slack bus
vc(m)=vm(m);
e(m)=vc(m) ;
end
if kb(m)==2 %Load bus
for k=1:nbus
if k~=m
yv(m)=yv(m)+ybus(m,k)*e(k);
end
end
vc(m)=(conj(S(m))/conj(e(m))-yv(m))/ybus(m,m);
(k+1) (k) k+1
% Vp (accelerated) = Vp + α (Vp -
k
Vp ) error(m)=abs(vc(m)-e(m));
e(m)=e(m)+1.4*(vc(m)-e(m));
end
51
if kb(m)==1 %Generator bus
% Ip =
% Ip = YppVp +
for k=1:nbus
if k~=m
yv(m)=yv(m)+ybus(m,k)*e(k);
end
end
cos(m)=real(e(m))/abs(e(m));
sin(m)=imag(e(m))/abs(e(m));
e(m)=vm(m)*cos(m)+j*vm(m)*sin(m);
Qnew(m)=-imag(conj(e(m))*(yv(m)+ybus(m,m)*e(m)))*100;
if(Qnew(m))<Qmin(m)
Q(m)=Qmin(m)/basemva;
S(m)=P(m)+j*Q(m);
e(m)=1.0+0*j;
vc(m)=((conj(S(m))/conj(e(m)))-yv(m))/ybus(m,m);
e(m)=e(m)+1.4*(vc(m)-e(m));
elseif Qnew(m) >Qmax(m)
Q(m)=Qmax(m)/basemva;
S(m)=P(m)+j*Q(m);
e(m)=1+0*j;
vc(m)=((conj(S(m))/conj(e(m)))-yv(m))/ybus(m,m);
e(m)=e(m)+1.4*(vc(m)-e(m));
else
Q(m)=Qnew(m)/basemva;
S(m)=P(m)+j*Q(m);
52
vc(m)=((conj(S(m))/conj(e(m)))-yv(m))/ybus(m,m);
% Vi (new) = Vispecified Cosδm
cos(m)=real(vc(m))/(abs(vc(m)));
sin(m)=imag(vc(m))/(abs(vc(m)));
vnew(m)=vm(m)*cos(m)+j*vm(m)*sin(m);
e(m)=vnew(m);
end
end
end
maxerror=max(error);
iter=iter+1;
iter
e
end
% CALCULATION OF LINE POWER FLOWS
ysh=zeros(nbus,nbus);
yln=zeros(nbus,nbus);
for k=1:nline
yln(lp(k),lq(k))=yln(lp(k),lq(k))+y(k);
yln(lq(k),lp(k))=yln(lp(k),lq(k));
ysh(lp(k),lq(k))=ysh(lp(k),lq(k))+j*ysh(k);
ysh(lq(k),lp(k))=ysh(lp(k),lq(k));
end
for i=1:nbus for
k=1:nbus
sln(i,k)=0+0*i;
end
end
*
% Spq = VI* = {Vp [(Vp -Vq ) Y lnpq]+
* *
Vp.Vp Y shpq} for m=1:nbus
for n=1:nbus
sln(m,n)=((e(m)*(conj(e(m))-
conj(e(n)))*conj(ybus(m,n)))+(e(m)*conj(e(m))*conj(ysh(m,n))))*basemva;
end
end
sln
53
OUTPUT :-
(a) P.V.BUS WITHOUT VIOLATION OF Q-LIMITS :-
( i ) BUS VOLTAGES :-
ITER. E1 E2 E3 E4
54
( i i ) LINE POWER FLOWS :-
sln =
0 27.2172 +64.8737i -25.9601 +32.2794i 0
55
(b) P.V.BUS WITH VIOLATION OF Q-LIMITS :-
( i ) BUS VOLTAGES :-
ITER. E1 E2 E3 E4
56
( i i ) LINE POWER FLOWS :-
sln =
0 27.4140 +71.6035i -25.7502 + 34.1245i 0
57
F.D.L.F. METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
clear;
clc;
rxratio=1.5;
% n v delta pd qd ysh
busdata=[ 1 1.05 0 0.000 0.000 0
2 1.00 0 0.278 0.069 0
3 1.00 0 0.442 0.084 0
4 1.00 0 0.195 0.066 0
5 1.00 0 0.149 0.05 0
6 1.00 0 0.26 0.016 0.5 ];
% lp lq z
linedata=[ 1 2 0.052
2 3 0.035
2 4 0.0645
4 5 0.0117
4 6 0.075 ];
nline=length(linedata(:,1));
nbus=length(busdata(:,1));
j=sqrt(-1);
for k=1:nline
lp(k)=linedata(k,1);
lq(k)=linedata(k,2);
z(k)=linedata(k,3);
x(k)=sqrt((z(k)^2)/(((rxratio)^2)+1));
r(k)=rxratio*x(k);
z(k)=r(k)+j*x(k);
y(k)=1/z(k); %branch admittance
end
58
%initiation of G MATRIX
G=zeros(nbus,nbus);
%finding off diagonal elements of G MATRIX
for k=1:nline
G(lp(k),lq(k))=G(lp(k),lq(k))-real(y(k));
G(lq(k),lp(k))=G(lp(k),lq(k));
end
if ((lp(k)==n)||(lq(k)==n))
G(n,n)=G(n,n)+real(y(k));
end
end
end
invG=inv(G(2:nbus,2:nbus));
%reading the bus data
for k=1:nbus
bus(k)=busdata(k,1);
vm(k)=busdata(k,2);
delta(k)=busdata(k,3);
pd(k)=busdata(k,4);
qd(k)=busdata(k,5);
delta=pi/180*delta;
end
maxerror=1;
iter=0;
59
%initialisation of isp,ical % Specified and calculated currents
for k=1:nbus-1
isp(k)=0;
ik(k)=0;
end
%calculation of specified e.c.i. % Equivalent current injection
for k=1:nbus-1
isp(k)=[conj(pd(k+1)+j*qd(k+1))/vm(k+1)];
end
%calculation of ik
for n=2:nbus
for k=1:nline
if lp(k)==n||lq(k)==n
if lp(k)==n
ik(n-1)=ik(n-1)+y(k)*(vm(lp(k))-vm(lq(k)));
end
if lq(k)==n ik(n-1)=ik(n-1)+y(k)*(vm(lq(k))-
vm(lp(k)));
end
end
end
end
%calculation of ical including the effect of shunt capacitance
for n=2:nbus
ik(n-1)=ik(n-1)+(j*busdata(n,6)*vm(n));
end
%finding e.c.i.mismatcher
for n=1:nbus-1
id(n)=-isp(n)-ik(n);
end
60
for i=1:nbus-1
delir(i,1)=real(id(i));
delii(i,1)=imag(id(i));
end
dele=invG*delir; %change in bus voltage(real part)
delf=invG*delii; %change in bus voltage(imag part)
end
maxerror=max(max(abs(dele)),max(abs(delf)));
Em=abs(vm);
ang=angle(vm);
iter
Em
ang
end
61
OUTPUT :-
BUS VOLTAGE MAGNITUDES :-
ITER E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6
1 1.0500 0.9684 0.9496 0.9235 0.9214 0.9048
62
PHASE ANGLES OF BUS VOLTAGES :-
ITER δ1 δ2 δ3 δ4 δ5 δ6
63
TRANSIENT STABILITY ANALYSIS BY “POINT BY POINT
METHOD”
clear;
clc;
t=0;
tf=0;
tfinal=0.5;
tc=0.125; %(FOR FAULT CLEARED AT 2.5 CYCLES:tc=0.05,
6.25CYCLES:tc=0.125, SUSTAINED FAULT:tc=0.5to1.0)
tstep=0.05;
M=2.52/(180*50);
i=2;
delta=21.64*pi/180;
ddelta=0;
time(1)=0;
ang(1)=21.64;
pm=0.9;
pmaxbf=2.44;
pmaxdf=0.88;
pmaxaf=2.00;
2
M D δ P −P P
2 S EA
% DT
M D 2δ P − P SINδ
2 S M
% DT
64
if(t==tc)
paminus=0.9-pmaxdf*sin(delta);
paplus=0.9-pmaxaf*sin(delta);
paav=(paminus+paplus)/2;
pa=paav;
end
if(t>tf&t<tc)
pa=pm-pmaxdf*sin(delta);
end
if(t>tc)
pa=pm-pmaxaf*sin(delta);
end
t
pa
2
% ∆δn = ∆δn-1 + [Pa(n-1). ∆t ]/M
ddelta=ddelta+(tstep*tstep*pa/M);
% δn = δn-1 + ∆δn
delta=(delta*180/pi+ddelta)*pi/180;
deltadeg=delta*180/pi;
t=t+tstep;
pause
time(i)=t;
ang(i)=deltadeg
i=i+1;
end
axis ([0 0.6 0 160])
plot(time,ang,'ko-')
grid
65
OUTPUT :-
66
Fig.2. SWING CURVE FOR FAULT CLEARED AT 6.25 CYCLES (tc=0.125sec)
67
Fig.3. SWING CURVE FOR SUSTAINED FAULT
68
Comparison of Accelerating Powers (P a) (p.u.) at different Fault clearing times :-
S.No. Time(t) Accelerating Power (Pa) (p.u.) for Fault cleared after-
(sec) 2.5cycles 6.25cycles Sustained fault
(tc=0.05sec) (tc=0.125sec)
69
Comparison of Torque Angles (δ) (degrees) at different Fault clearing times :-
S.No. Time (t) Torque Angle (δ) (degrees) for Fault cleared after-
(sec) 2.5cycles 6.25cycles Sustained fault
(tc=0.05sec) (tc=0.125sec)
70
Frequency Deviation and Power Deviation of Two area Load Frequency
Control
Aim : To plot Frequency Deviation and Power Deviation response of Two area Load
Frequency Control
71
72
OUTPUT WAVE FORM :-
73
74
OUTPUT WAVE FORM :-
Fig . TIE-LINE POWER DEVIATION IN TWO AREA SYSTEM WITH INTEGRAL CONTROL
75
MODELLING AND FAULT ANALYSIS OF
TRANMSIISION LINE MODEL
Any power system model can be simulated using power system blockset and simulink in MATLAB
R2014. Consider the single line diagram of a sample power system shown in Fig. 1.
The diagram shown in Fig. 2 represents the Simulink block model for Fig. 1 which consists of a three
phase 66KV power system transmitting power from two 25 MVA generators on either side of a 300km
transmission line. The transmission line is split into two 150 Km lines connected between buses B1 and B2.
The system consists of two generators (simplified synchronous machines), two three phase two winding
transformers, two circuit breakers, a transmission line, and a three-phase fault block.
This system contains the Powergui block inorder to discretize the system. In addition, when start the
system the model, the sampling time Ts = 5e-6 seconds is automatically set in workspace. Therefore the
system is be discretized using a 5 microseconds sample time. The power system model is simulated for
different types of faults. The fault parameters are changed for each type of fault in three phase fault block
connected in the system. The three phase currents are taken for the fault classification in the transmission line
between two buses.
76
77
Fig. 2. Tranmission line model
Parameters
of various blocks in power system model are given below.
(i) Simplified Synchronous Machine :
Mechanical power Input,Pm/ph : 0.721842 p. u. (default value)
Voltage, E/ph : 1.00746 p. u. (default value)
Connection Type : 3 – wire Y
Nominal Power : 25 MVA
Line – Line Voltage : 13.2 KV
Frequency : 50 Hz
Inertia Constant : 3.7 (default value)
Damping factor :0
Pairs of Poles :2
Internal Impedance
R (p. u.) : 0.02 (default value)
X (p. u.) : 0.3 (default value)
Initial conditions
dw (%), theta (deg) : 0, 0
ia, ib, ic (p. u. ) : 0, 0, 0
Pha, Phb, Phc (deg) : 0, 0, 0
(ii) Series R Load :
Nominal Voltage, ph-ph, Vn(rms) : 13.2 KV
Nominal Frequency, fn (Hz) : 50
Active Power, P : 1742 W
Inductive Reactive Power QL :0
Capacitive Reactive Power,QC :0
(iii) Three – Phase, Two – winding Transformer-1:
Nominal Power : 25 MVA
Nominal Frequency, fn (Hz) : 50
Winding 1 (ABC) Connection : Yg
Winding 1 Parameters
78
V1 (ph-ph) (rms) : 13.2 Kv
R1 (p. u. ) : 0.002
L1 (p. u. ) : 0.08
Winding 2 (ABC) Connection : D1
Winding 2 Parameters
V2 (ph-ph) (rms) : 66 Kv
R2 (p. u. ) : 0.002
L2 (p. u. ) : 0.08
Magnetization Resistance, Rm (p. u.): 500
Magnetization Reactance, Lm (p. u.) : 500
(iv) Distributed Parameters line :
Number of Phases (N) :3
Frequency, f Hz : 50
Resistance per unit length (Ω/km)
[R1 Ro] : [ 0.01273 0.3864 ]
Inductance per unit length (H/Km)
[L1 L0) : [0.9337e-3 4.1264e-3]
Capacitance per unit length (F/Km)
[C1 Co] : [12.74e-9 7.751e-9]
Line length (Km) : 150
(V) Three – Phase Breaker:
Transition times : [0.001 0.2]
Breaker Resistance Ron (Ω) : 0.001 (default value)
Snubbers Resistance Rp (Ω) : 1e6 (default value)
Snubbers Capacitance Cp (F) : inf
(Vi) Three – Phase Fault Block:
Fault Resistance Ron : 0.001
Ground Resistance Rg : 0.001
Transition status : [1 0]
Transition times : [0.001 0.2]
79
Snubbers Resistance Rp (Ω) : 1e6
Snubbers Capacitance Cp (F) : inf
(Vii) Three – Phase, Two – winding Transformer-2:
Nominal Power : 25 MVA
Nominal Frequency, fn (Hz) : 50
Winding 1 (ABC) Connection : D1
Winding Parameters
V1 (ph-ph) (rms) : 66 Kv
R1 (p. u. ) : 0.002
L1 (p. u. ) : 0.08
Winding 2 (ABC) Connection : Yg
Winding Parameters
V2 (ph-ph) (rms) : 13.2 Kv
R2 (p. u. ) : 0.002
L2 (p. u. ) : 0.08
Magnetization Resistance Rm (p. u.) : 500
Magnetization Reactance Lm (p. u.) : 500
SIMULATION RESULTS
The simulation Results of the proposed power system model shown in Fig. 2 are given as follows.
4.5.1 Pre- Fault :
The Phase Voltage waveforms of the power system model for Pre-Fault condition are shown in Fig. 3.
80
Fig. 3 Phase Voltage Waveforms for Pre-Fault
The values of Phase Voltages are observed from Fig. 3 and are tabulated in Table 1.
81
The Phase Current waveforms of the power system model for Pre-Fault condition are shown in Fig. 4.
Ib 0.05116 0.03302
Ic 0.06409 0.03657
The Phase Voltage waveforms of the power system model when a three phase to ground fault has
occurred between phases A, B, C, and Ground at the midpoint of the transmission line connected between
Buses B1 and B2, are as shown in Fig. 5.
82
Fig. 5 Phase Voltage waveforms for L-L-L-G Fault
The values of the Phase Voltages are observed from Fig. 5 and are tabulated in Table 3.
From the Table 3, it can be observed that the Phase Voltages are zero during the time of fault. After
the fault is cleared, the Phase Voltages reaches to the steady state after initial transient voltages are over. The
steady state Phase Voltages are higher than that under Pre-Fault condition.
83
The Phase Current waveforms of the power system model under L-L-L-G Fault are shown in Fig. 6.
The values of Phase Currents are observed from Fig. 6 and are tabulated in Table 4.
Ia 426.5 435.7 0
Ib 898 494.1 0
Ic 766.3 498.7 0
84
From the Table 4, it can be observed that the Phase Currents are more than that under pre-fault
condition and current reaches to zero after the fault is cleared.
L- L-G Fault between Phases B, C & Ground :
The Phase Voltage waveforms of the power system model when a Double line to ground fault has
occurred between phases B, C, and Ground at the midpoint of the transmission line connected between Buses
B1 and B2, are shown in Fig. 7.
The values of Phase Voltages are observed from Fig. 7 and are tabulated in Table 5.
Table 5 : Phase Voltages for L-L–G Fault
Phase Voltage During the Fault After the Fault is cleared
(Volts) Peak value Steady state value
(Volts) (Volts)
5 5 5
Va 0.9493 10 2.108 10 1.448 10
5 5
Vb 0 2.188 10 1.426 10
5 5
Vc 0 2.007 10 1.453 10
85
From the above table, it can be observed that the Phase Voltages are zero for phases B and C during
the time of fault. After the fault is cleared, the Phase Voltages reaches to the steady state after initial transient
voltages are over. The steady state Phase Voltages are higher than that under Pre-Fault condition.
The Phase Current waveforms of the power system model for L–L–G Fault are shown in Fig. 8.
Ic 513.7 427.3 0
From the Table 6, it can be observed that the Phase Currents are more than that under Pre-Fault
condition and Current reaches to zero in the phases B and C after the fault is cleared.
86
L- L Fault between Phases B, & C :
The Phase Voltage waveforms of the power system model when a Double line Fault has occurred
between phases B and C at the midpoint of the transmission line connected between Buses B1 and B2, are
shown in Fig. 9.
The values of Phase Voltages are observed from Fig. 9 and are tabulated in Table 7.
87
From the Table 7, it can be observed that the Phase Voltages have some finite value during the time of
fault. After the fault is cleared, the Phase Voltages reaches to the steady state after initial transient voltages
are over. The steady state Phase Voltages are higher than that under pre-fault condition.
The Phase Current waveforms of the power system model for L-L Fault are shown in Fig. 10.
88
L- G Fault between Phase A & Ground :
The Phase Voltage waveforms of the power system model when a Single Line to Ground Fault has
occurred between phase A and Ground at the midpoint of the transmission line connected between Buses B1
and B2, are as shown in Fig. 11.
From the above Table, it can be observed that the Voltage in Phase A is zero during the time of fault.
After the fault is cleared, the phase voltage reaches to the steady state after initial transient voltages are over.
The steady state phase voltages are higher than that under pre-fault condition.
89
The Phase Current waveforms of the power system model for L- G Fault are shown in Fig. 12.
Ia 209 68.85 0
From the Table 10, it can be observed that the Phase Currents are more than that under Pre-Fault
condition and Current reaches to zero in the phase A after the fault is cleared.
90