Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by :-
Name : Praveen PS
Roll no : 21519033
Sem VII
Department of Ship Technology
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Table of Contents
1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................6
1.1. Luxury Cruise Vessel...................................................................................................................6
1.2. History and Concept of Cruise Vessels........................................................................................6
1.3. Types of Cruise Ship....................................................................................................................8
1.3.1. Mainstream Cruise Ship.......................................................................................................8
1.3.2. Mega Cruise Ship.................................................................................................................8
1.3.3. Ocean Cruise Ship................................................................................................................9
1.3.4. Luxury Cruise Ship................................................................................................................9
1.3.5. Small Cruise Ship................................................................................................................10
1.3.6. Adventure Cruise Ship.......................................................................................................11
1.3.7. Expedition Cruise Vessel....................................................................................................11
1.3.8. River Cruise Ship................................................................................................................12
1.4. Classification Of Cruise Ships....................................................................................................12
1.5. Motivation and Potential..........................................................................................................13
1.6. Design Criteria..........................................................................................................................14
1.7. Objective...................................................................................................................................15
1.8. Selection of Classification Society.............................................................................................15
1.9. Route of Operation...................................................................................................................16
1.10. Port Characteristics.................................................................................................................17
1.10.1. Cochin International Cruise Terminal...............................................................................17
1.10.2. Mumbai International Cruise Terminal............................................................................18
2. Fixing Main Dimension....................................................................................................................21
2.1. Luxury Cruise Ship Design.........................................................................................................21
2.2. Functions Of Cruise Ship...........................................................................................................22
2.2.1. Hotel Functions..................................................................................................................22
2.2.2. Ship Functions....................................................................................................................23
2.3. Sizing of Luxury Cruise Ship......................................................................................................23
2.3.1. Deck Area...........................................................................................................................23
2.3.2. Stability and Sea Keeping Performance.............................................................................23
2.3.3. Capacity for required endurance.......................................................................................23
2.4. Mission Requirements..............................................................................................................24
2.5. Main Dimension Fixing.............................................................................................................24
2.6. Evan’s Design Spiral..................................................................................................................24
2.7. Practical Ship Design.................................................................................................................26
Page | 1
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page | 2
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Table of Figures
Page | 3
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
List of Tables
Page | 4
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Page | 5
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
1. Introduction
The period from 1800 to the Second World War saw an increase in
ships with regular routes. This was a result of trade between Europe and the
colonies in the east and west, and the increase in the number of immigrants to
the Americas. These vessels initially carried cargo and passengers, but their
main concern was the amount of cargo they could carry. In 1818, The Black
Ball Line of New York was the first shipping company to offer regular routes
from the United States to England, considering its passengers’ comfort. Then, in
the 1830s, steamships were introduced which dominated the transatlantic mail
and passenger transport market. On July 4, 1840, Britannia, Cunard's first ship,
left Liverpool
Page | 6
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
with a cow onboard to cater for the supply of fresh milk to its passengers during
the 14-day voyage across the Atlantic. The emergence of leisure cruises started
in the year 1844, which marked the emergence of a new industry.
Page | 7
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
It is the most prevalent and well-known type of cruise ship, and the
majority of companies in the industry sell them as floating resorts that are
furnished to accommodate the needs of most cruise passengers. These ships can
accommodate between 850 and 3,000 passengers and feature all the typical
resort facilities, services, and amenities, including dining establishments, bars
and pubs, nightclubs and discos, shopping areas, theatres and movie theatres,
galleries and museums, libraries, casinos, spas and fitness centres, swimming
pools, and other sporting venues.
Page | 8
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page | 9
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
client looking for longer itineraries and more exotic destinations around the
world.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Always smaller than seagoing cruise ships, and with a capacity for
no more than a few hundred passengers, these vessels are specially designed to
navigate rivers and inland waterways, offering from exciting experiences
onboard ultra-high-tech units, to nostalgic trips on paddleboats ships in rivers
such as Amazon, Nile, Rhine, Siene, Volga, Mississippi, Yangtse, and many
more in all the world.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
The demand for cruise vessels has grown dramatically over the
past few years. The total number of passengers carried on a cruise worldwide
was 1,84,21,000 in 2010 and has increased to 2,60,00,000 in the three quarters
of 2018.
Besides this recurrent increase, we can still cite catalysis for this growth.
Among the passengers around the globe, the most cruises have been to the
Caribbean & US, and Europe. But the industry in those countries has reached a
level of saturation by the second quarter of 2015 and cruise ship operators have
started operations in other parts of the world more frequently than it was before,
which includes, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Macau, Dubai, and India,
including the Queen of Arabian Sea-Cochin. Also, the tourism sector of the
aforementioned places has seen a tremendous boom. The cruise vessels also
serve as a stay for tourists.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
The route, thereby the length of the cruise has also a major effect
on the design of a cruise vessel. Depending on the length of the cruise, more
provisions and stores are to be provided which adds to the volume consumed
inside the vessel. Hence, cruise ships are characterized by, vessels with a greater
number of decks and high GRT and comparatively less displacement and
thereby draft.
An additional important requirement is the safety regulations of
Passenger Ships by International Statutory bodies which encompass not only
Stability but fire protection and in recent times there have been major research
in the Escape route analysis of the vessels. This is especially important for
“taller” cruise vessels with more no. of passengers
1.7. Objective
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
For this design project, the vessel is intended to be classed with LR class.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Length – 244m
Depth – 9.5m
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
CHAPTER 2
MAIN DIMENSION
FIXING
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
A cruise ship must satisfy both the hotel functions and ship
functions as follows:
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
The cruise ship hulls should have enough deck space for all the
facilities that are intended to be offered on board. If the required deck area is not
reached, the number of decks must be raised, which has an impact on the ship's
stability and seakeeping abilities. Therefore, without sacrificing stability, the
linear size, number of decks, and available deck area must all be balanced
throughout the design phase.
2.3.2. Stability and Sea Keeping Performance
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
The volume should be sufficient to hold all the supplies and fuel
needed for the intended duration of the voyage. This volume requirement is
equally crucial to amenities' volume requirements.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Detailed design
As we move along the spiral into its core, we move from a zone of
less information to extremely specific instruction for the construction of ship or
in other words- "Realization of the design into a product". This project deals
with the concept design stage of a vessel and also preliminary design stage to a
limit.
Figure 2-3: Evan's Design Spiral
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
In his book, Watson et al. states that the design of Volume based
carriers poses two different problems. In the first of these the required capacity
is known and the problem is that of finding a solution to the volume equations,
whilst in the second, the problem lies in establishing the required volume. These
refers to volume carriers in general, and in his 1976 paper, there has been
graphs from which dimensions of ship corresponding to required capacity could
be read. But it is obvious that, the graph has been left behind by a further
growth in ship size and indeed this now deters any attempt at a new plot because
the scale required to accommodate the largest ships is so small that the
information it would supply would be almost useless for smaller vessels.
The book further gives different guidance to estimate the volume
required in Volume Carriers. Furthermore, in the 1976 paper, Watson et al.
further suggests that, the next step should be the division of the total volume
into a main hull volume and a superstructure volume and that this should be
done by assuming that the superstructure volume was a certain percentage of the
total volume.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Sl. No Vessel Name PAX Crew GT LOA Beam Draft Depth DWT
1 MS Europa 408 275 42830 199 24 6.3 12.8 3252
2 Seven Seas 518 324 28550 170 24.8 7.3 12.3 3342
Navigator
3 Silver Whisper 388 300 28258 190 24.9 6 11.3 2980
4 Seabourn 450 335 32346 198 26 6.4 15.25 5000
Odyssey
5 MS Europa 2 516 370 42830 225 26.70 6.3 12.8 5285
6 MS Roald 530 300 21765 143 24 5.4 10.2 1800
Amundsen
7 MS Vesteralen 510 105 6261 108 16.52 4.6 9.1 900
8 MS 520 260 22400 175.49 23 5.8 10.9 3460
Deutschland
9 Seabourn 450 300 32346 198 26 6.7 11.85 5000
Sojourn
10 silver shadow 438 295 28258 186 24.8 6.12 11.3 2980
11 Seabourn 450 300 32346 198 26 6.7 11.85 5000
Quest
12 Funchal 524 155 9563 152.6 19.05 6.18 11.3 2975
Table 2-1: Parent Ship Analysis
From the above table, regression calculations are done, to find the
relation between various ratios either with the number of passengers or with
gross tonnage. Furthermore, the dimensions are so scattered based on the
amenities, not even a relation between the number of passengers and gross
tonnage could be drawn out.
Detailed regression calculations have been done. Following table
shows the regression summary of various ratios with number of passengers as
well as Gross Tonnage. The table shows values of R 2 of various regression
calculation with different parameters.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
in this case, only 6 unrelated cases have an R2 value greater than 0.6.
Therefore, it can be concluded that, parent ship analysis can’t be directly used
for fixing the main dimensions, but can be referred to for a range of values.
2.9. System Based Design
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
When you board a cruise ship, one of the crucial factors affecting
your enjoyment while onboard is how spacious the vessel feels. As you re likely
going to be there for a while, you will have a view on how much personal space
you enjoy. Some folks call this ‘elbow room’. By definition, gross tonnage is
the measurement of a ship’s internal volume, that is, its overall interior space.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
sewage is treated and discharged overboard at sea, but it must be stored during
port stops. Fuel and lubricating oil stores are based on the length of the route,
the average speed and the specific consumption of the installed engines and
refuelling policy.
LIGHTSHIP WEIGHT
Sl No Weight Group Unit Unit Coefficient Weight
Value tonne / unit tonne
1 Hull Hull 66572.70 0.080 5325.76
Volume m3
DEADWEIGHT
SL Item Unit Unit Value Coefficient Weight
No tonne/unit tonne
1 Passenger and Persons 750 0.10 75
Crew persons
2 Provisions and Persons 750 0.20 150
stores persons
3 Fuel Oil Consumed/Trip 477 2.20 1049
tonne/trip
4 Lub Oil Consumed/Trip 4 10.00 40
tonne/trip
5 Fresh Water Consumed/Trip 1125/trip 0.50 562.5
5 Sewage in Produced 1000/trip 0.25 250
Holding Tanks
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
DISPLACEMENT
Deadweight 17%
From the above checks displacement of the vessel was found out
and also from linear interpolation the dimensions of the vessel were obtained.
Using the general arrangement drawing, the outline of the decks was used to
create a model in Rhinoceros 2021 keeping a uniform deck height of 2.8m. The
obtained model was then imported to MAXSURF Modeller to get the
preliminary lines of the particular hull form.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
2.16.1. Corrections
Correction 1 Regulation 29
The tabular freeboard for a type ‘B’ ship of between 24 m and 100
m in length having enclosed superstructures with an effective length of up to
35% of the length of the ship shall be increased by:
7.5 (100 – L) (0.35 – E1/L) mm
where L is the length of the ship in m; and E1 is the effective length E of
superstructure in m as defined in regulation 35, but excluding the length of
trunks.
Not Applicable
Correction 2
Where the block coefficient (CB) exceeds 0.68, the tabular
freeboard specified in regulation 28 as modified, if applicable, by regulations
27(8), 27(10) and 29 shall be multiplied by the factor:
(CB+ 0.68)
1.36
Not Applicable
Correction 3
Where D exceeds L, the freeboard shall be increased by (D – L/15)
R mm, where R is L/0.48 at lengths less than 120 m and 250 at 120 m length
and above.
= (16. 8-(198.6/15)) *250
= 890mm
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
-1
-2
-3
-4 -250
255075100125150175
Heel to Starboard deg.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
criteria
applicable to
all ships
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.2: Max 0.200 m 2.265 Pass +1032.5
- Design GZ at 30 or 0
criteria greater
applicable to
all ships
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.3: 25.0 deg 53.6 Pass +114.54
- Design Angle of
criteria maximum
applicable to GZ
all ships
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.4: 0.150 m 3.698 Pass +2365.3
- Design Initial GMt 3
criteria
applicable to
all ships
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.5: 10.0 deg 0.0 Pass +100.00
- Design Passenger
criteria crowding:
applicable to angle of
all ships equilibrium
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.6: 10.0 deg 0.0 Pass +100.00
- Design Turn: angle
criteria of
applicable to equilibrium
all ships
Table 2-10:Stability Check with IMO criteria’s
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
The initial power calculation from the graph of Gross Tonnage v/s
Power value came out to be 27840kW. Hence the preliminary resistance check
is satisfied as the difference is only a small value which can be neglected. The
calculation part of the resistance check has been attached in Appendix.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
CHAPTER 3
HULL GEOMETRY
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
3. HULL GEOMETRY
3.1. Overview
In this chapter the modelling of the hull and the generation of the
lines of the design has been explained. This will be a step for the stability
calculations in the upcoming sections. The following steps were followed for
the final construction of the model.
Step 1: The initial step of modelling is by importing the preliminary general
arrangement to Rhinoceroses 2021 software.
Step 2: The basic hull has been developed from the preliminary general
arrangement by arranging the decks one above the other and then lofting the
surface to obtain the complete model. The modelling was done in Rhinoceros
2021. Decks from 6 to 2 where selected for the hull development. A bulbous
was added using the Orca 3D plugin.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Step 3: The obtained model was transformed into the required model with
the dimensions as well particulars meeting the same as those were calculated in
the previous chapter. For this there was some changes done in the transom and
the obtained model is shown below in Figure 3-2. These changes where done
using the Orca 3D plugin.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Step 4: The hull model made in Rhino was then exported and then used in
Maxsurf Modeller for further changes. Fig 3-5 shows the model when imported
to Maxsurf.
Step 5: The imported model is then verified for its particulars using the
functions in Maxsurf modeller. Here the calculated length, breadth and depth of
the vessel are given as input. The window below shows sizing of the required
surface.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Step 7: The frame of reference was then set for obtaining the design
grid for the lines plan.
Step 8: Now for obtaining the lines plan, the required number of stations,
waterlines and buttocks were given as input in the design grid. All half stations
and half waterlines where also included. The model was divided into 20stations
in length between the perpendiculars, 9 waterlines along the depth of the model
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
and 05 buttocks along the beam of the model. Figure below shows the design
grid for the model and also the all three views of the model after the design grid
has been set.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Step 9: Hydrostatic calculation, plotting of Bonjean curves etc are all don’t
through the offset values. The offset values are obtained directly from Maxsurf
modeller for the defined hull with the given design grid. The figure below
shows the offset calculation for station 20.
Step 10: Fairing of the lines was done in AutoCAD and the model was
again checked for the hydrostatic particulars. The final particulars came out to
be those mentioned in the figure below. These were matching with
approximately with the previous calculations.
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
STN/
WL 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 LWL 4 5 6 7 8 MDK
stn 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 6.968 8.05 9.759 10.728 11.265 11.757 12.261 12.5
stn 1.5 0 0 0 0.675 4.967 9.238 9.731 10.638 11.236 11.601 11.953 12.318 12.5
stn 2 0 0 0 3.782 6.892 9.894 10.262 10.973 11.443 11.743 12.035 12.343 12.5
stn 3 0 0.423 4.448 7.218 9.008 10.812 11.048 11.506 11.788 11.984 12.177 12.387 12.5
stn 4 0 3.446 6.738 8.839 10.164 11.437 11.602 11.907 12.064 12.177 12.292 12.425 12.5
stn 5 0 4.636 7.855 9.745 10.854 11.862 11.988 12.201 12.278 12.329 12.387 12.457 12.5
stn 6 0 5.107 8.452 10.249 11.238 12.112 12.218 12.384 12.42 12.435 12.455 12.482 12.5
stn 7 0 5.438 8.79 10.502 11.417 12.221 12.316 12.462 12.484 12.485 12.489 12.495 12.5
stn 8 0 5.723 8.964 10.608 11.48 12.251 12.342 12.481 12.5 12.499 12.499 12.5 12.5
stn 9 0 6.016 9.064 10.648 11.499 12.257 12.347 12.482 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
stn 10 0 6.25 9.123 10.663 11.503 12.258 12.348 12.482 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
stn 11 0 6.384 9.167 10.678 11.509 12.26 12.349 12.483 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
stn 12 0 6.417 9.195 10.697 11.519 12.263 12.352 12.483 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
stn 13 0 6.347 9.194 10.708 11.529 12.268 12.355 12.484 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
stn 14 0 6.167 9.121 10.669 11.504 12.256 12.345 12.479 12.498 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
stn 15 0 5.894 8.89 10.455 11.312 12.117 12.219 12.388 12.443 12.468 12.482 12.492 12.5
stn 16 0 5.565 8.426 9.941 10.809 11.704 11.833 12.082 12.228 12.315 12.376 12.421 12.436
stn 17 0 5.185 7.738 9.113 9.955 10.936 11.099 11.46 11.752 11.951 12.099 12.22 12.262
stn 18 0 4.641 6.779 7.921 8.684 9.733 9.937 10.441 10.932 11.298 11.582 11.826 11.914
stn
18.5 0 3.954 5.935 6.982 7.718 8.823 9.053 9.66 10.302 10.802 11.194 11.529 11.649
stn 19 0 3.023 4.488 5.384 6.153 7.463 7.745 8.505 9.359 10.072 10.646 11.12 11.287
stn
19.5 0 2.33 3.153 3.521 3.659 5.238 5.698 6.814 7.939 8.925 9.788 10.5 10.747
stn 20 0 1.747 2.44 2.628 2.566 0 0.039 3.938 6.082 7.348 8.456 9.486 9.857
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
STN/WL 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0 0 0 0 9.132333 37.667 76.98833 119.9727 165.39 213.1273
0.5 0 0 0 15.32833 49.38967 90.50767 134.5087 180.5487 228.5807
1 0 0 2.225 24.159 61.69267 104.282 149.174 195.7737 244.0713
1.5 0 0 10.166 39.533 79.55233 123.378 169.0563 216.16 264.6977
2 0 0 15.08067 49.29367 91.23067 136.1193 182.494 230.0447 278.7953
3 0 8.858667 36.68933 76.69933 121.4727 168.0893 215.6343 263.9507 313.073
4 0 14.58 49.10167 92.57133 139.3637 187.3203 235.8017 284.7337 334.1617
5 0 17.32867 55.41033 101.0653 149.2787 198.2453 247.457 296.885 346.569
6 0 18.79267 58.81 105.7107 154.7813 204.3963 254.1047 303.8823 353.754
7 0 19.63433 60.656 108.1197 157.5587 207.4577 257.3947 307.342 357.3093
8 0 20.07733 61.547 109.1893 158.7237 208.6923 258.69 308.6857 358.6833
9 0 20.33767 62.02267 109.7123 159.2593 209.2293 259.2293 309.2293 359.2293
10 0 20.49367 62.28733 109.9863 159.535 209.505 259.505 309.505 359.505
11 0 20.609 62.49133 110.2053 159.76 209.7317 259.7317 309.7317 359.7317
12 0 20.68033 62.635 110.3737 159.9333 209.905 259.905 309.905 359.905
13 0 20.67433 62.65233 110.4207 159.9913 209.9647 259.9647 309.9647 359.9647
14 0 20.488 62.28167 109.978 159.516 209.4757 259.4723 309.4723 359.4723
15 0 19.936 60.879 107.915 156.997 206.669 256.4947 306.396 356.3453
16 0 18.86633 57.83233 103.0307 150.68 199.3197 248.4143 297.8017 347.401
17 0 17.31633 53.11433 95.04867 139.918 186.373 233.796 281.905 330.552
18 0 15.18267 46.394 83.34167 123.762 166.5497 211.037 256.8103 303.6397
18.5 0 13.254 40.786 73.95733 110.9883 150.9597 193.2037 237.2147 282.6797
19 0 9.917 31.31733 58.63867 90.63733 126.4123 165.3207 206.79 250.3553
19.5 0 7.188333 20.45467 38.24967 62.504 92.05633 125.8253 163.3017 203.928
20 0 5.651333 16.56067 19.52467 27.99867 48.33133 75.244 106.878 142.788
Table 3-2: Bonjean Area Ordinates
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
STN/WL 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0
0 0 0 54.794 301.336 769.8833 1439.672 2315.46 3410.037
0.5
0 0 0 91.97 395.1173 905.0767 1614.104 2527.681 3657.291
1
0 0 8.9 144.954 493.5413 1042.82 1790.088 2740.831 3905.141
1.5
0 0 40.664 237.198 636.4187 1233.78 2028.676 3026.24 4235.163
2
0 0 60.32267 295.762 729.8453 1361.193 2189.928 3220.625 4460.725
3
0 17.71733 146.7573 460.196 971.7813 1680.893 2587.612 3695.309 5009.168
4
0 29.16 196.4067 555.428 1114.909 1873.203 2829.62 3986.271 5346.587
5
0 34.65733 221.6413 606.392 1194.229 1982.453 2969.484 4156.39 5545.104
6
0 37.58533 235.24 634.264 1238.251 2043.963 3049.256 4254.353 5660.064
7
0 39.26867 242.624 648.718 1260.469 2074.577 3088.736 4302.788 5716.949
8
0 40.15467 246.188 655.136 1269.789 2086.923 3104.28 4321.599 5738.933
9
0 40.67533 248.0907 658.274 1274.075 2092.293 3110.752 4329.211 5747.669
10
0 40.98733 249.1493 659.918 1276.28 2095.05 3114.06 4333.07 5752.08
11
0 41.218 249.9653 661.232 1278.08 2097.317 3116.78 4336.243 5755.707
12
0 41.36067 250.54 662.242 1279.467 2099.05 3118.86 4338.67 5758.48
13
0 41.34867 250.6093 662.524 1279.931 2099.647 3119.576 4339.505 5759.435
14
0 40.976 249.1267 659.868 1276.128 2094.757 3113.668 4332.613 5751.557
15
0 39.872 243.516 647.49 1255.976 2066.69 3077.936 4289.544 5701.525
16
0 37.73267 231.3293 618.184 1205.44 1993.197 2980.972 4169.223 5558.416
17
0 34.63267 212.4573 570.292 1119.344 1863.73 2805.552 3946.67 5288.832
18
0 30.36533 185.576 500.05 990.096 1665.497 2532.444 3595.345 4858.235
18.5
0 26.508 163.144 443.744 887.9067 1509.597 2318.444 3321.005 4522.875
19
0 19.834 125.2693 351.832 725.0987 1264.123 1983.848 2895.06 4005.685
19.5
0 14.37667 81.81867 229.498 500.032 920.5633 1509.904 2286.223 3262.848
20
0 11.30267 66.24267 117.148 223.9893 483.3133 902.928 1496.292 2284.608
Table 3-3: Bonjean Moment Ordinates
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Draft/Particular 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Waterplane
Area 2374.115 3267.636 3748.103 3970.647 4060.664 4119.036 4169.797 4218.004
Volume
Displacement 2641.199 8356.153 15414.88 23155.71 31192.30 39373.27 47662.53 56050.76
Mass
Displacement 2707.229 8565.057 15800.25 23734.61 31972.11 40357.60 48854.09 57452.03
TPC (salt water) 24.33468 33.49326 38.41805 40.69913 41.62181 42.2201 42.74042 43.23455
TPC (fresh
water) 23.74115 32.67636 37.48103 39.70647 40.60664 41.19036 41.69797 42.18004
MTC (salt) 224.2079 361.75158 474.11600 536.64529 566.11882 585.64203 602.50229 618.30782
Table 3-4: Hydrostatic data
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV
3.5. Conclusion
The suitable hull form has been generated and the displacement at
DWL was almost near to the displacement estimated during the preliminary
dimension fixing. From the nature of the smooth variation of the hydrostatic
curves it can be made clear that the hull is properly faired. A proper hand
drawing of the lines was also drawn using the traditional method. This
developed model can hence be used in the further sections for the respective
calculations.
Page |