You are on page 1of 64

PROJECT REPORT

LUXURY CRUISE VESSEL

DEPARTMENT OF SHIP TECHNOLOGY


COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
COCHIN-682022
2023

Submitted by :-
Name : Praveen PS
Roll no : 21519033
Sem VII
Department of Ship Technology
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Table of Contents

1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................6
1.1. Luxury Cruise Vessel...................................................................................................................6
1.2. History and Concept of Cruise Vessels........................................................................................6
1.3. Types of Cruise Ship....................................................................................................................8
1.3.1. Mainstream Cruise Ship.......................................................................................................8
1.3.2. Mega Cruise Ship.................................................................................................................8
1.3.3. Ocean Cruise Ship................................................................................................................9
1.3.4. Luxury Cruise Ship................................................................................................................9
1.3.5. Small Cruise Ship................................................................................................................10
1.3.6. Adventure Cruise Ship.......................................................................................................11
1.3.7. Expedition Cruise Vessel....................................................................................................11
1.3.8. River Cruise Ship................................................................................................................12
1.4. Classification Of Cruise Ships....................................................................................................12
1.5. Motivation and Potential..........................................................................................................13
1.6. Design Criteria..........................................................................................................................14
1.7. Objective...................................................................................................................................15
1.8. Selection of Classification Society.............................................................................................15
1.9. Route of Operation...................................................................................................................16
1.10. Port Characteristics.................................................................................................................17
1.10.1. Cochin International Cruise Terminal...............................................................................17
1.10.2. Mumbai International Cruise Terminal............................................................................18
2. Fixing Main Dimension....................................................................................................................21
2.1. Luxury Cruise Ship Design.........................................................................................................21
2.2. Functions Of Cruise Ship...........................................................................................................22
2.2.1. Hotel Functions..................................................................................................................22
2.2.2. Ship Functions....................................................................................................................23
2.3. Sizing of Luxury Cruise Ship......................................................................................................23
2.3.1. Deck Area...........................................................................................................................23
2.3.2. Stability and Sea Keeping Performance.............................................................................23
2.3.3. Capacity for required endurance.......................................................................................23
2.4. Mission Requirements..............................................................................................................24
2.5. Main Dimension Fixing.............................................................................................................24
2.6. Evan’s Design Spiral..................................................................................................................24
2.7. Practical Ship Design.................................................................................................................26

Page | 1
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2.8. Parent Ship Analysis..................................................................................................................27


2.8.1. Regression Analysis............................................................................................................27
2.9. System Based Design................................................................................................................28
2.9.1. Passenger Facilities............................................................................................................29
2.9.2. System Summary...............................................................................................................32
2.9.3. Space Ratio........................................................................................................................32
2.10. Preliminary General Arrangement..........................................................................................33
2.11. Selecting Main Dimensions.....................................................................................................35
2.12. Preliminary Power Estimation.................................................................................................37
2.13. Preliminary Selection of Main and Auxiliary Engine................................................................37
2.14. Lightship and Deadweight......................................................................................................39
2.15. Preliminary Lines.....................................................................................................................41
2.16. Freeboard check.....................................................................................................................43
2.16.1. Corrections.......................................................................................................................44
2.17. Stability Check........................................................................................................................45
2.18. Resistance Check....................................................................................................................46
3. HULL GEOMETRY.............................................................................................................................49
3.1. Overview...................................................................................................................................49
3.2. Faired Offsets............................................................................................................................56
3.3. Bonjean Areas and Moments....................................................................................................57
3.3.1. Bonjean Area Ordinates.....................................................................................................57
3.3.2. Bonjean Moment Ordinates..............................................................................................58
3.3.3. Bonjean Curves..................................................................................................................59
3.4. Hydrostatic Data.......................................................................................................................60
3.4.1. Hydrostatic Curves.............................................................................................................61
3.4.2. Curves of Form...................................................................................................................62

Page | 2
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Table of Figures

Figure 1-1: Royal Caribbean's Cruise - Wonders of The Sea.................................................6


Figure 1-2:Prinzessin Victoria Luise was the first purpose-built cruise ship............................7
Figure 1-3: Carnival Cruise Line, A Mainstream Cruise ship..................................................8
Figure 1-4: Harmony of The Seas, A Mega Cruise Ship.........................................................9
Figure 1-5: Viking Sea, An Ocean Cruise Ship.......................................................................9
Figure 1-6: Seven Seas Explorer, A Luxury Cruise Vessel...................................................10
Figure 1-7: Windstar Cruises, A Small Cruise Ship...............................................................10
Figure 1-8: An Adventure Cruise Ship..................................................................................11
Figure 1-9: Seabourn Venture, An Expedition Cruise Vessel................................................12
Figure 1-10: Viking Mississippi, A River Cruise Ship.............................................................12
Figure 1-11:Growth of Worldwide Passengers......................................................................14
Figure 1-12: Llyod’s Register................................................................................................16
Figure 1-13: Global Cruise Statistics.....................................................................................16
Figure 1-14: Desired Sea Route...........................................................................................17
Figure 1-15: Cochin International Cruise Terminal................................................................18
Figure 1-16: Mumbai International Cruise Terminal..............................................................19
Figure 2-1: An Aesthetic Cruise Ship....................................................................................21
Figure 2-2: Functions of a cruise vessel...............................................................................22
Figure 2-3: Evan's Design Spiral...........................................................................................25
Figure 2-4: System Based Design........................................................................................29
Figure 2-5: Preliminary General Arrangement......................................................................34
Figure 2-6: Length Interpolation............................................................................................35
Figure 2-7: Breadth Interpolation..........................................................................................36
Figure 2-8: Draught Interpolation..........................................................................................36
Figure 2-9: Gross Tonnage v/s Power..................................................................................37
Figure 2-10: Engine Specifications.......................................................................................38
Figure 2-11:Wartsila 12V32 Bore Engine..............................................................................39
Figure 2-12: Total Displacement...........................................................................................41
Figure 2-13: Model of Hull.....................................................................................................42
Figure 2-14: Preliminary Lines..............................................................................................42
Figure 2-15: GZ curve........................................................................................................... 45
Figure 3-1: General Arrangement in RHINO.........................................................................49
Figure 3-2: RHINO model from General Arrangement..........................................................49
Figure 3-3: Parametric Transformation in Orca 3D...............................................................50
Figure 3-4: Final Model in RHINO.........................................................................................50
Figure 3-5:Model in Maxsurf.................................................................................................51
Figure 3-6: Sizing of the model.............................................................................................51
Figure 3-7: Parametric Transformation of the model.............................................................52
Figure 3-8:Setting Frame of Reference.................................................................................52
Figure 3-9:Design Grid......................................................................................................... 53
Figure 3-10:Lines Plan from Design Grid..............................................................................53
Figure 3-11: Offsets for station 20.........................................................................................54
Figure 3-12: Hydrostatics at DWL.........................................................................................55

Page | 3
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

List of Tables

Table 1-1: Classification of Cruise Ships...............................................................................13


Table 2-1: Parent Ship Analysis............................................................................................27
Table 2-2: Regression Analysis............................................................................................28
Table 2-3: List of Passenger Cabins.....................................................................................29
Table 2-4: List of Amenities..................................................................................................30
Table 2-5: List of technical and crew facilities allocation.......................................................31
Table 2-6: Volume and Gross Tonnage Calculation..............................................................32
Table 2-7: Lightship Calculation............................................................................................40
Table 2-8: Deadweight and Displacement Calculation..........................................................41
Table 2-9: Preliminary Hydrostatics at DWL.........................................................................43
Table 2-10:Stability Check with IMO criteria’s.......................................................................46
Table 3-1:Faired Offsets.......................................................................................................56
Table 3-2: Bonjean Area Ordinates.......................................................................................57
Table 3-3: Bonjean Moment Ordinates.................................................................................58
Table 3-4: Hydrostatic data...................................................................................................60

Page | 4
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

Page | 5
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

1. Introduction

1.1. Luxury Cruise Vessel

A cruise ship is an opulent boat that is designed to transport


passengers on leisurely journeys where the journey itself is just as important as
the numerous locations along the way. A cruise ship, or cruise liner as it is
commonly known, transports passengers on round trips that can range in length
from one day to possibly a week and end at the port of embarkation, as opposed
to an ocean liner which transports passengers from one point on the globe to the
other frequently across oceans. This is a very revitalising form of fun and
amusement that greatly renews energy and calms the mind. Wonder of the Seas
is an Oasis-class cruise ship owned and operated by Royal Caribbean
International. It is a recently built ship in the year 2022 having a passenger
capacity of around 5800.

Figure 1-1: Royal Caribbean's


Cruise - Wonders of The Sea

1.2. History and Concept of Cruise Vessels

The period from 1800 to the Second World War saw an increase in
ships with regular routes. This was a result of trade between Europe and the
colonies in the east and west, and the increase in the number of immigrants to
the Americas. These vessels initially carried cargo and passengers, but their
main concern was the amount of cargo they could carry. In 1818, The Black
Ball Line of New York was the first shipping company to offer regular routes
from the United States to England, considering its passengers’ comfort. Then, in
the 1830s, steamships were introduced which dominated the transatlantic mail
and passenger transport market. On July 4, 1840, Britannia, Cunard's first ship,
left Liverpool
Page | 6
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

with a cow onboard to cater for the supply of fresh milk to its passengers during
the 14-day voyage across the Atlantic. The emergence of leisure cruises started
in the year 1844, which marked the emergence of a new industry.

Figure 1-2:Prinzessin Victoria Luise was the


first purpose-built cruise ship

At the beginning of the 1920s, the concept of "superliners"


emerged. Germany led the market in the development of huge "floating hotels".
The design of these ships tried to minimize the discomfort of ocean travel as
much as possible through elegant accommodations, passenger amenities, and
planned activities.
The First World War interrupted the construction of new ships,
converting the oldest ships into troop-carrying ships. The same happened during
the Second War during which all transatlantic travels ceased. The increase in air
travel and the first non-stop flight to Europe in 1958 marked the end of the
transatlantic market. The shipping companies went bankrupt for lack of business
and the ships were sold.
The 1960s marked the beginning of the modern cruise industry.
The companies focused on cruise holidays and created the concept of a “fun
ship”. Today, hundreds of cruise ships, some carrying more than 5000
passengers cruise around the world. For some destinations such as the Arctic
and Antarctica cruise ships are practicing the only means of visiting. The cruise
is now considered as one of the most popular types of vacation. Since 2004, tens
of millions of people have been cruising to all sorts of places from the
Caribbean to Europe to Alaska.

Page | 7
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

1.3. Types of Cruise Ship

The different types of cruise ships that are designed to provide


cruise and excursion services in seas, oceans, rivers and lakes all around the
world
1.3.1. Mainstream Cruise Ship

It is the most prevalent and well-known type of cruise ship, and the
majority of companies in the industry sell them as floating resorts that are
furnished to accommodate the needs of most cruise passengers. These ships can
accommodate between 850 and 3,000 passengers and feature all the typical
resort facilities, services, and amenities, including dining establishments, bars
and pubs, nightclubs and discos, shopping areas, theatres and movie theatres,
galleries and museums, libraries, casinos, spas and fitness centres, swimming
pools, and other sporting venues.

Figure 1-3: Carnival Cruise Line, A Mainstream Cruise ship

1.3.2. Mega Cruise Ship

The demand for these services is growing globally, and cruise


firms have responded by designing and constructing ever-larger cruise ships that
can carry more than 3,000 passengers. With some units frequently serving more
than 5,000 passengers, mega ships are a new kind of cruise ship and the next
step in terms of capacity and onboard amenities. They are currently the largest
and most technologically advanced boats in the world.

Page | 8
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 1-4: Harmony of The Seas, A Mega Cruise Ship

1.3.3. Ocean Cruise Ship

A specific kind of cruise ship constructed to higher standards than


more traditional ships, with notably more sturdy architecture and construction to
survive the very challenging circumstances of ocean voyages on lengthy and
global excursions.

Figure 1-5: Viking Sea, An Ocean Cruise Ship

1.3.4. Luxury Cruise Ship

Motor or sail powered cruise ships equipped with the most


sophisticated and technologically advanced nautical systems, high standard
features and luxurious comforts to meet the special demands of an exclusive

Page | 9
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

client looking for longer itineraries and more exotic destinations around the
world.

Figure 1-6: Seven Seas Explorer, A Luxury Cruise Vessel

1.3.5. Small Cruise Ship

Cruise ships that range in size from motor or sail-powered yacht-


like vessels to medium-sized classic cruise ships with a capacity of up to a few
hundred passengers onboard, providing more intimate and relaxing experiences
than the larger mass-market vessels in less well-known destinations, designed to
provide specific services (ecotourism, culture or history cruises, conventions at
sea, sea sports, single cruises, senior cruises, business incentive cruises, etc.), or
as the only way to travel to certain destinations.

Figure 1-7: Windstar Cruises, A Small Cruise Ship

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

1.3.6. Adventure Cruise Ship

Cruise ships designed and equipped to provide services that include


visits of remote destinations, most commonly out-of-the-way or inaccessible to
larger vessels. Marketed to a very specific sector of clientele, adventure cruise
ships are far smaller than mainstream vessels, usually sail powered and
generally equipped with luxury features.

Figure 1-8: An Adventure Cruise Ship

1.3.7. Expedition Cruise Vessel

Specially designed ships, or modified research or icebreaker


vessels, operated by specialised companies to provide their customers with an
exclusive experience in remote locations and waterways, such as the Arctic and
Antarctic regions or coastal areas in ecological and biosphere reserves, in what
can be seen as more than private expeditions than conventional cruises onboard
vessels with an adequate level of comfort, safety, and services, which include
inflatable motor boats and, sometimes, even helicopters for expedition trips and
shore landings.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 1-9: Seabourn Venture, An Expedition Cruise Vessel

1.3.8. River Cruise Ship

Always smaller than seagoing cruise ships, and with a capacity for
no more than a few hundred passengers, these vessels are specially designed to
navigate rivers and inland waterways, offering from exciting experiences
onboard ultra-high-tech units, to nostalgic trips on paddleboats ships in rivers
such as Amazon, Nile, Rhine, Siene, Volga, Mississippi, Yangtse, and many
more in all the world.

Figure 1-10: Viking Mississippi, A River Cruise Ship

1.4. Classification Of Cruise Ships

The classification of cruise ships have been done on the basis of


Gross registered Tonnage and their Passenger Capacity.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Size Gross registered Passenger Capacity


Tonnage
Very small Under 10,000 Not exceeding 200
Small 10,000 – 20,000 200 - 500
Medium 20,000 – 50,000 500 - 1200
Large 50,000 – 70,000 1200 - 2000
Megaship More than 70,000 More than 2000
Table 1-1: Classification of Cruise Ships

1.5. Motivation and Potential

The demand for cruise vessels has grown dramatically over the
past few years. The total number of passengers carried on a cruise worldwide
was 1,84,21,000 in 2010 and has increased to 2,60,00,000 in the three quarters
of 2018.
Besides this recurrent increase, we can still cite catalysis for this growth.
Among the passengers around the globe, the most cruises have been to the
Caribbean & US, and Europe. But the industry in those countries has reached a
level of saturation by the second quarter of 2015 and cruise ship operators have
started operations in other parts of the world more frequently than it was before,
which includes, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Macau, Dubai, and India,
including the Queen of Arabian Sea-Cochin. Also, the tourism sector of the
aforementioned places has seen a tremendous boom. The cruise vessels also
serve as a stay for tourists.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 1-11:Growth of Worldwide Passengers

1.6. Design Criteria

It takes a lot of work to design a cruise ship, and while it doesn't


have the same working machinery as a cargo ship, it does have a variety of
systems for the pleasure and enjoyment of the passengers. In light of this, the
availability of capacity for the aforementioned systems is a vital component of
cruise ship design. If the end product is to be a safe, seaworthy, and
"entertaining" ship, a lot of factors must be taken into account during the design
stage, including:
 A cruise vessel will have more decks in the superstructure than any vessel,
which comprises all the accommodation modules and amenities for the
passengers.
 The stability of cruise ships is very crucial, though a high margin cannot be
given because that will make a very stiff ship, which affects the comfort of
the passengers.
 The extent of amenities needed has a huge influence on the design of the
vessel. It is true to say that no two cruise vessels will be the same even if it
has the same no. of passenger capacity. While some may share a similar hull
form, it is highly unlikely that they have the same amenities on board.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

The route, thereby the length of the cruise has also a major effect
on the design of a cruise vessel. Depending on the length of the cruise, more
provisions and stores are to be provided which adds to the volume consumed
inside the vessel. Hence, cruise ships are characterized by, vessels with a greater
number of decks and high GRT and comparatively less displacement and
thereby draft.
An additional important requirement is the safety regulations of
Passenger Ships by International Statutory bodies which encompass not only
Stability but fire protection and in recent times there have been major research
in the Escape route analysis of the vessels. This is especially important for
“taller” cruise vessels with more no. of passengers
1.7. Objective

This project aims to design a cruise vessel to accommodate 500


passengers and the required crew and staff. The ship should be self-sustained for
all the entertainment facilities and amenities onboard
Speed – 25knots
Length – 140m approx.
1.8. Selection of Classification Society

A Classification Society is highly preferred for a Passenger ship,


though a class is not a mandate. A classed vessel will ensure the vessel's safety
and seaworthiness, giving the passengers a symbol of trust or more than that
credibility for the insuring agent which ensures passenger ships carry the most
valuable resource in the world: Humans.
The vessel operators and owners build and maintain the vessel in
service of the classification society for insurance, mortgage, and marketing
purposes.
The following classification societies are found to be well experienced in Cruise
vessels (Passenger Vessel)
Registro Italino Navale (RINA)
Bureau Veritas (BV)
Lloyd’s Register (LR)
Det Norske Veritas-Germanischer Lloyd (DNV-GL)

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

For this design project, the vessel is intended to be classed with LR class.

Figure 1-12: Llyod’s Register

1.9. Route of Operation

The vessel is intended to operate from Mumbai to Cochin, Cochin


to Lakshadweep

Figure 1-13: Global Cruise Statistics

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 1-14: Desired Sea Route

1.10. Port Characteristics

1.10.1. Cochin International Cruise Terminal

Cruises are viewed as a significant business opportunity by Cochin


Port. We are dedicated to creating Cochin Port a top cruise destination on the
Indian subcontinent that offers services of the highest calibre. Annual calls to
Cochin Port are made by significant cruise lines such as Cunard Lines, Royal
Caribbean Lines, Aida Cruises, Costa Cruises, etc.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 1-15: Cochin International Cruise Terminal

Two specific cruise terminals are available at Cochin Port:


"SAMUDRIKA" at BTP and "SAGARIKA" at Ernakulam Wharf. Both
terminals are cutting-edge, completely air-conditioned "Cruise Passenger
Facilitation Centres," which provide all legislative approvals for cruise
passengers under one roof, including immigration and customs. For cruise ships
passing through India, the Indian government has loosened cabotage laws,
making it easier to transfer Indians from one Indian port to another.
Length – 250m
Draft – 10m
1.10.2. Mumbai International Cruise Terminal

The terminal is situated at Ballard Pier (BPX) within 5-10 minutes


driving distance from the Taj Mahal Hotel, Museum, Art galleries, CBD of
Fort, Colaba Causeway, Nariman Point and Marine Drive. The Cruise Terminal
has check- in baggage handling facilities, a lounge, duty-free shop, curios, and
handicraft stalls and toilets etc. Features: Dedicated Cruise Terminal at BPX
Domestic Cruise at Ferry Wharf Shed no. 3

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 1-16: Mumbai International Cruise Terminal

Length – 244m
Depth – 9.5m

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

CHAPTER 2
MAIN DIMENSION
FIXING

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2. Fixing Main Dimension

2.1. Luxury Cruise Ship Design

The luxury cruise ship is a leisure vessel, and as such, it always


strives to provide the passengers with the utmost comfort through its diverse
attractions including theatres, cinemas, shops, restaurants, nightclubs, casinos,
swimming pools, and spas, among other forms of amusement. The cruise liner
becomes more of a fantasy than a mode of transportation. People of all ages and
all classes like glamorous vacations filled with great luxury and pampering.
Although they frequently don't care where they go on their trips, they eventually
settle into this "resort" on the high seas.
People will spend days on board this ship, thus comfort is a top
priority. Therefore, it is crucial that an ideal stability condition be sought during
the design process in order to reduce the vessel's roll movement. Stabilizers are
common on cruise ships to lessen this movement. The exterior aesthetics and
the internal decorating of these boats are additional distinguishing features. All
cruise lines strive to provide customers with ships that are elegantly decorated
and have a welcoming exterior.
Therefore, a cruise vessel is distinguished by its internal decoration
and general arrangement, as well as the external aesthetics.

Figure 2-1: An Aesthetic Cruise Ship

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2.2. Functions Of Cruise Ship

A cruise ship must satisfy both the hotel functions and ship
functions as follows:

Figure 2-2: Functions of a cruise vessel

2.2.1. Hotel Functions

The amenities of a hotel include passenger cabins, restaurants,


lounges, and bars. Spaces like corridors, halls, elevators, and staircases should
be given as appropriate passageways. Other crucial characteristics are open
areas. Offices, galleries, pantries, laundries, and stores are necessary for service
functions. Room service, housekeeping, and crew cabins are additional hotel
services. Service staff on cruise ships have their own runners and ladders since
only uniformed crew members are permitted to ride in guest areas.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2.2.2. Ship Functions

The Ship functions are responsible for taking the aforementioned


“Hotel Functions” safely from port to port. The propulsive machinery and fuel
storage tanks are vital systems. The Ship produces electricity, air conditioning,
hot and cold water, has sewage and garbage systems.
2.3. Sizing of Luxury Cruise Ship
Function of a cruise ship is to transport passengers with maximum
comfort and safety. It is determined by the amenities owner wishes to provide
for its passengers. This makes cruise ship, a “Volume Carrier”, that is, it is
meant to carry light cargo. Volume becomes the critical criterion when the
cargo to be carried is light. Thereby, Volume, Deck area, Linear Dimensions
and Stability is very critical for a cruise ship.
It can be said that main drivers for the sizing of hull are:
 Deck Area
 Stability and Sea Keeping Performance
 Capacity for required endurance

2.3.1. Deck Area

The cruise ship hulls should have enough deck space for all the
facilities that are intended to be offered on board. If the required deck area is not
reached, the number of decks must be raised, which has an impact on the ship's
stability and seakeeping abilities. Therefore, without sacrificing stability, the
linear size, number of decks, and available deck area must all be balanced
throughout the design phase.
2.3.2. Stability and Sea Keeping Performance

In high seas, stability and good seakeeping qualities are crucial to


ensuring passenger comfort and safety. Size, form, and weight distribution of
the vessel all affect stability and seakeeping. Based on past experience, it is
generally expected that conventional hull forms will provide good motion
characteristics for maximum comfort. A detailed analysis of the motion
characteristics of small or unique hull forms is necessary during the design
phase.
2.3.3. Capacity for required endurance

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

The volume should be sufficient to hold all the supplies and fuel
needed for the intended duration of the voyage. This volume requirement is
equally crucial to amenities' volume requirements.

2.4. Mission Requirements

The following conclusions can be considered and fixed as the


mission requirements for this design.
 The required deck area is based on the amenities intended to provide
onboard. 450 passengers are intended to be carried along with a crew of
300 members. The amenities are drawn from the owner’s specification
 The required hull volume is thus obtained from the required deck space.
For such medium size vessels, if the requirement of deck area is met, the
volume will be well enough for buoyancy.
 The inside hull volume will also be enough for an intended endurance of
7days.
2.5. Main Dimension Fixing

The process of deciding main dimensions during initial design


phase is an iterative one. At and after each stage of the process, checks are
carried out to ensure that the vessel will meet all the specified design
requirements. To derive the main dimensions of the vessels, the concepts that
are already known and widely used are employed. These are from:
 Evan’s Design Spiral
 Practical Ship Design
 Parent Ship Analysis
 Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
 System Based Design

2.6. Evan’s Design Spiral

The Design Spiral is a systematic approach to achieving near


perfect designs for a given ship design problem. A naval architect traces his way
along the design spiral through the different stages of design given below:
 Concept design
 Preliminary design
 Contract design

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

 Detailed design

As we move along the spiral into its core, we move from a zone of
less information to extremely specific instruction for the construction of ship or
in other words- "Realization of the design into a product". This project deals
with the concept design stage of a vessel and also preliminary design stage to a

limit.
Figure 2-3: Evan's Design Spiral

The Concept Design stage is where the mission requirements are


translated into characteristics of naval architecture and engineering. Feasibility
studies are conducted using the basic ship components, such as length, beam,
depth, draught, fullness, power, or alternate sets of characteristics, all of which
match the specifications for speed, range, and deadweight. Estimating the
weight of light ships is also done. This stage involves evaluating alternative
designs to find the best cost-effective design option.
The primary ship parameters that affect cost and performance are
essentially improved and elaborated during the Preliminary Design stage. After
this stage is finished, it is unlikely that variables like length, beam, horsepower,
and deadweight will alter. Additionally, it serves as a foundation for the creation
of contract plans and specifications.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2.7. Practical Ship Design

In his book, Watson et al. states that the design of Volume based
carriers poses two different problems. In the first of these the required capacity
is known and the problem is that of finding a solution to the volume equations,
whilst in the second, the problem lies in establishing the required volume. These
refers to volume carriers in general, and in his 1976 paper, there has been
graphs from which dimensions of ship corresponding to required capacity could
be read. But it is obvious that, the graph has been left behind by a further
growth in ship size and indeed this now deters any attempt at a new plot because
the scale required to accommodate the largest ships is so small that the
information it would supply would be almost useless for smaller vessels.
The book further gives different guidance to estimate the volume
required in Volume Carriers. Furthermore, in the 1976 paper, Watson et al.
further suggests that, the next step should be the division of the total volume
into a main hull volume and a superstructure volume and that this should be
done by assuming that the superstructure volume was a certain percentage of the
total volume.

However, a very small change in the design of a ship can make a


very major change in this percentage. To overcome this difficulty, it is
suggested that the percentage should be derived from a suitable basis ship. If
suitable data is not available a reasonable first approximation might assume that
the superstructure will provide 25% of the total volume. A ship of this sort will
have a relatively high uppermost continuous deck and the minimum of
erections. A ship thus designed will require a greater number of iterations to
reach optimum value of number of decks and linear dimensions.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2.8. Parent Ship Analysis

Sl. No Vessel Name PAX Crew GT LOA Beam Draft Depth DWT
1 MS Europa 408 275 42830 199 24 6.3 12.8 3252
2 Seven Seas 518 324 28550 170 24.8 7.3 12.3 3342
Navigator
3 Silver Whisper 388 300 28258 190 24.9 6 11.3 2980
4 Seabourn 450 335 32346 198 26 6.4 15.25 5000
Odyssey
5 MS Europa 2 516 370 42830 225 26.70 6.3 12.8 5285
6 MS Roald 530 300 21765 143 24 5.4 10.2 1800
Amundsen
7 MS Vesteralen 510 105 6261 108 16.52 4.6 9.1 900
8 MS 520 260 22400 175.49 23 5.8 10.9 3460
Deutschland
9 Seabourn 450 300 32346 198 26 6.7 11.85 5000
Sojourn
10 silver shadow 438 295 28258 186 24.8 6.12 11.3 2980
11 Seabourn 450 300 32346 198 26 6.7 11.85 5000
Quest
12 Funchal 524 155 9563 152.6 19.05 6.18 11.3 2975
Table 2-1: Parent Ship Analysis

2.8.1. Regression Analysis

From the above table, regression calculations are done, to find the
relation between various ratios either with the number of passengers or with
gross tonnage. Furthermore, the dimensions are so scattered based on the
amenities, not even a relation between the number of passengers and gross
tonnage could be drawn out.
Detailed regression calculations have been done. Following table
shows the regression summary of various ratios with number of passengers as
well as Gross Tonnage. The table shows values of R 2 of various regression
calculation with different parameters.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

For obtaining results within permissible results from regression, the


R value must be at least greater than 0.8, higher the value, the better. However,
2

in this case, only 6 unrelated cases have an R2 value greater than 0.6.

Dependence Parameter PAX GT


Linear Quadratic Cubic Linear Quadratic Cubic
L 0.1944 0.232 0.2341 0.8565 0.8825 0.8971
L/B 0.2464 0.2729 0.3072 0.6095 0.6566 0.6730
B/T 0.0027 0.0655 0.2416 0.0474 0.0937 0.2946
L/D 0.1247 0.1275 0.1293 0.3877 0.4319 0.4482
B/D 0.0043 0.0757 0.1912 0.0005 0.272 0.4

Table 2-2: Regression Analysis

Therefore, it can be concluded that, parent ship analysis can’t be directly used
for fixing the main dimensions, but can be referred to for a range of values.
2.9. System Based Design

Evan's Design Spiral, which captures the sequential and iterative


nature of the process, is the most frequently used metaphor for describing ship
design, as was mentioned in the previous section. The conclusion reached was
that the present design ideologies do not trust this spiral. The Naval Architect
will have to patch and mend that first concept rather than exploring other
options because the Evan's model ties the Naval Architect to the basic
assumptions. The traditional design spiral is straightened by to address this
issue. The number of loops till final design is reduced by categorising the needs
into musts and wishes. The QFD aids in classifying the needs into musts and
wants. The revised design spiral is depicted in Figure 2.4 below.
A tool for design in the conceptual stage is system-based design.
The general layout is produced early in the process, which does not need the
choice of the ship's primary proportions. The hotel and ship functions are
specified, and the necessary deck space and volume are computed for each of
them as indicated in the table. The number of cabins and their sizes give us the
area needed for passenger cabins. Based on the number of seats and the amount
of space required for each, restaurants and lounges are estimated. The height
between decks is used to determine the volumes. The gross height from steel to
steel is used.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 2-4: System Based Design

2.9.1. Passenger Facilities

2.9.1.1. Passenger Cabins

Sl No. Cabin Category No. of Size Height Total Total


cabins (m2) Area Volume
(m )
2
(m3)
1 Royal Suites 4 76.2 2.8 304.8 975.36
2 Grand Suites 26 54.41 2.8 1414.66 3961.048
3 Prime Suites 15 36.99 2.8 554.85 1553.58
4 Veranda Suites 15 37.95 2.8 569.25 1593.9
5 Winter Suites 40 33.60 2.8 1344 3763.2
6 Classical Suites 55 34.09 2.8 1874.95 5249.86
7 Luxury Suites 34 25.95 2.8 882.3 2470.44
8 Oceanview 26 28.90 2.8 751.4 2103.92
Suites
Passenger 215 7696.21 21671.31
Accommodation
Table 2-3: List of Passenger Cabins

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2.9.1.2. Passenger Public Spaces

Sl No Type Size Height Total Total


Area Volume
1 The Retreat 244.96 2.8 244.96 685.88
2 Sun Terrace 143.60 1.8 143.60 258.48
3 Fitness 123.79 2.8 123.79 346.61
Centre
4 Royal Spa 117.66 2.8 117.66 329.448
5 Games 615.05 2.8 615.05 1722.14
Room
6 Open Bar 124.84 2.8 124.84 349.552
7 Reading 97.27 2.8 97.27 272.356
Room
8 Arts Room 147.32 2.8 147.32 412.496
9 4K MAX 672.70 5.8 672.70 3901.66
Theatre
10 Boutique 175.49 2.8 175.49 491.372
11 Drawing 147.56 2.8 147.56 413.16
Room
12 Club and 630.49 2.8 630.49 1765.372
Casino
13 Hobby 109.30 2.8 109.30 306.04
Room
14 Meeting 109.30 2.8 109.30 306.04
Room
15 Cafeteria 851.66 2.8 851.66 2384.64
16 Great 419.4580 2.8 513.54 1437.912
Restaurant
17 Pools 57.82 2.8 57.82 161.896
18 Sun Circle 193.587 - - -
19 Clinic 80.2867 2.8 80.2867 224.80
20 Restaurant 115.9715 2.8 115.9715 324.72
2
21 Helpdesk 30.4638 2.8 30.4638 85.29
22 Spa 270.4176 2.8 270.176 757.17
5379.248 16937.034

Table 2-4: List of Amenities

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2.9.1.3. Technical and Crew Facilities Allocation

SL No Type Size Height Total Volume


1 Officers 907.0791 2.8 789.264
Cabin
2 Crew Cabin 1875.6087 2.8 7021.39
3 Mess 805.44 2.8 2255.232
4 Machineries, 2349.7284 2.8 5040
Laundry
Stores
5 Elevator, 11600.6064 2.8 34511.2944
Stairways,
Spaces,
Corridors
6 Tanks, Voids, 1700 2.8 4760
DB
7 Anchor 1000 2.8 2800
Systems
8 AC plant, RO 480.4141 2.8 420
plant, STP ,
Garbage
Storage-
20238.4626 55567.568

Table 2-5: List of technical and crew facilities allocation

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2.9.2. System Summary

The areas and volumes of all such systems are summarised in


Table below. When that is done, the initial sizing of the ship is defined. The
total volume in cubic meters given by the system description is translated into
Gross Tonnage by the following formula:
𝐺𝑇=(0.2+0.02∗𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑉) ∗𝑉, Where V is the total enclosed spaces (m3).

Sl No Space Area Volume


1 Passenger Cabins 7696.21 21671.31

2 Passenger Public 5379.248 16937.034


Spaces
3 Technical, Crew 20238.4626 55567.568
Facilities
Allocation
Total Volume 94175.92
Gross Tonnage 28203.6888
Table 2-6: Volume and Gross Tonnage Calculation

2.9.3. Space Ratio

When you board a cruise ship, one of the crucial factors affecting
your enjoyment while onboard is how spacious the vessel feels. As you re likely
going to be there for a while, you will have a view on how much personal space
you enjoy. Some folks call this ‘elbow room’. By definition, gross tonnage is
the measurement of a ship’s internal volume, that is, its overall interior space.

The measurement is, broadly, the capacity in cubic feet of the


spaces within the hull and of the enclosed spaces above the deck available for
cargo, stores, passengers and crew, with certain exceptions, divided by 100.
Thus 100 cubic feet of capacity is equivalent to one gross ton. It is easy to
calculate and get a feel for how crowded you might feel on a particular class of
ship. It is the simple ratio between the size of the vessel Gross Tonnage divided
by the number of passengers. Gross Tonnage (GT) is the number used for all
ships built after 18th July 1982.The resulting magic number is called the
Passenger to Space Ratio. As a rough guide, the Passenger-to-space Ratio bands
are as follows:

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

 51 and Above – Very Spacious Ships


 31-50 – Spacious
 21-30 – Not so spacious
 20 and under – Expect cramped conditions
Passenger Space Ratio = Gross Tonnage (GT)/Number of passengers

Passenger Space Ratio = 28203.688/450 = 63(Very Spacious Ships)


2.10. Preliminary General Arrangement

The estimation of main dimensions was found to be too much


scattered in the parent ship analysis. The regression analysis done for various
parameters with Gross Tonnage and PAX. The results obtained where not
satisfactory as there were only 3 values greater than 0.8. Hence to obtain a brief
knowledge about fixing the dimensions, a preliminary general arrangement is
drawn. Here all the amenities are fixed according to the owners’ requirements.
The dimensions of all the amenities have been in accordance with those of the
parent ships with similar requirements.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 2-5: Preliminary General Arrangement

After fixing the dimensions of the amenities a preliminary general


arrangement was prepared. The dimensions which were obtained from the
general arrangement are as follows:
Length :- 198.4971 Breadth:- 27.1044

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

A conclusion cannot be drawn from the obtained dimension as these


are those values obtained when the amenities where distributed in various decks.
2.11. Selecting Main Dimensions

A particular conclusion couldn’t be drawn from the preliminary


general arrangement. Here the statistics of an already built ship was compared
and the values where in accordance with the requirements. For the design of
luxury cruise vessel, the key factor is the deck area. The easiest way of
increasing the area is to add the number of decks on the top of the vessel. But
this is a hindrance to the stability of the vessel, hence this limitation should be
taken into consideration.
The main dimensions of the vessel are thus interpolated from
already built ships having the similar requirements. These were interpolated in
reference to the gross tonnage. Gross Tonnage obtained from the preliminary
general arrangement was taken as the input value for obtaining results of length,
breadth and draught. The graph obtained after interpolation are as follows.

Figure 2-6: Length Interpolation

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 2-7: Breadth Interpolation

Figure 2-8: Draught Interpolation

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

The values hence obtained from interpolation are as follows:


Length: - 198.6m
Breadth: - 25m
Draught: - 6.5m
2.12. Preliminary Power Estimation

The preliminary power estimation is done on the basis of the parent


ship analysis. Vessels similar to the above mention dimensions where
considered. Analysis was done from the Power v/s Gross Tonnage graph where
the current gross tonnage gave a power output in the range of 20000 -22000kW.

Figure 2-9: Gross Tonnage v/s Power

2.13. Preliminary Selection of Main and Auxiliary Engine

The range of power output was obtained from figure 2.9.


Comparison was done with parent ships having the same power and a study was
carried out on their engines and their specifications. The main engine selected
for this design is Diesel/electric: Wartsila type 12V32 - 12-cylinder
combustion engines. Four engines of the same are required to obtain the
required power output.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 2-10: Engine Specifications

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 2-11:Wartsila 12V32 Bore Engine

2.14. Lightship and Deadweight

The first weight estimate can be based on the system description.


The lightweight calculation in the concept design phase is based on 6 to 10 main
groups. As the design process proceeds and more information becomes
available, each main group is further divided into sub groups and sub-sub
groups. The weight calculation must be based on statistical data from built ships
to give the necessary accuracy. The steel weight of the hull and superstructure
are calculated based on their volume. Interior outfitting is based on furnished
area. For ship outfitting the total volume is used and for machinery the installed
power is used.
The deadweight calculation is based on the demanded payload and
performance. The passenger and crew height is normally taken as 100kg per
person. Provision had stores depend on the number of persons and the length of
the cruise. Fresh water and sewage is calculated in the same way. In cruise ships
fresh water is produced onboard by evaporating seawater, so all the fresh water
consumed during the trip need not be included in the deadweight. Similarly,
Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

sewage is treated and discharged overboard at sea, but it must be stored during
port stops. Fuel and lubricating oil stores are based on the length of the route,
the average speed and the specific consumption of the installed engines and
refuelling policy.
LIGHTSHIP WEIGHT
Sl No Weight Group Unit Unit Coefficient Weight
Value tonne / unit tonne
1 Hull Hull 66572.70 0.080 5325.76
Volume m3

2 Superstructure SS 55109.50 0.040 2204.38


Volume m3
3 Interior Area 24414 0.170 4150.38
Outfitting m2
4 Ship Volume 121682.20 0.007 851.775
Outfitting m3
5 Machinery Volume 27840 0.065 1809.6
Outfitting Installed kW
Power
Total Volume 121682.20 0.121 14522.85

Lightship Volume 14342


Weight
Table 2-7: Lightship Calculation

DEADWEIGHT
SL Item Unit Unit Value Coefficient Weight
No tonne/unit tonne
1 Passenger and Persons 750 0.10 75
Crew persons
2 Provisions and Persons 750 0.20 150
stores persons
3 Fuel Oil Consumed/Trip 477 2.20 1049
tonne/trip
4 Lub Oil Consumed/Trip 4 10.00 40
tonne/trip
5 Fresh Water Consumed/Trip 1125/trip 0.50 562.5
5 Sewage in Produced 1000/trip 0.25 250
Holding Tanks

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

6 Heeling and 500


Trimming
Water
7 Water in 200
Swimming
Pools
8 Miscellaneous 200
DEADWEIGHT 3026
DISPLACEMENT 17368
Table 2-8: Deadweight and Displacement Calculation

DISPLACEMENT
Deadweight 17%

Lightship Weight 83%

Figure 2-12: Total Displacement

2.15. Preliminary Lines

From the above checks displacement of the vessel was found out
and also from linear interpolation the dimensions of the vessel were obtained.
Using the general arrangement drawing, the outline of the decks was used to
create a model in Rhinoceros 2021 keeping a uniform deck height of 2.8m. The
obtained model was then imported to MAXSURF Modeller to get the
preliminary lines of the particular hull form.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 2-13: Model of Hull

The lines obtained from the above model which includes 10


stations, 10 waterlines and 02 buttocks.

Figure 2-14: Preliminary Lines

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

The particulars obtained from the preliminary lines are as follows: -


Sl No Measurement Value Units
1 Displacement 16690 t
2 Volume (displaced) 16576.030 m3
3 Draft Amidships 6.5 m
4 Immersed Depth 6.5 m
5 WL Length 179.955 m
6 Beam max extends on WL 24.497 m
7 Prismatic coeff. (Cp) 0.788
8 Block coeff. (Cb) 0.579
9 Max Sect. area coeff. (Cm) 0.735
10 Waterplane. Area coeff. 0.865
(Cwp)
11 LCB length 97.800 from zero pt. (+ve
fwd.) m
12 LCF length 90.919 from zero pt. (+ve
fwd.) m
13 KB 3.979 m
14 Length: Beam ratio 7.346
15 Beam: Draft ratio 3.769
Table 2-9: Preliminary Hydrostatics at DWL

2.16. Freeboard check

For freeboard check we have used the International Load Line


Convention, 1996. The International Convention on Load Lines, 1966 (1966 LL
Convention) was adopted on April 5, 1966 and entered into force on July 21,
1968. Ships built prior to that date were covered by the 1930 Load Line
Convention. The 1966 LL Convention was modified by the 1988 Protocol
which was adopted on November 11, 1988 and entered into force on February
3, 2000.
The vessel comes under the Type B category of vessels. The
Tabular Freeboard of Regulation 28 from the convention for finding the
freeboard according to the length of the vessel.

Tabular Freeboard 3249mm Regulation 28

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2.16.1. Corrections

Correction 1 Regulation 29
The tabular freeboard for a type ‘B’ ship of between 24 m and 100
m in length having enclosed superstructures with an effective length of up to
35% of the length of the ship shall be increased by:
7.5 (100 – L) (0.35 – E1/L) mm
where L is the length of the ship in m; and E1 is the effective length E of
superstructure in m as defined in regulation 35, but excluding the length of
trunks.
Not Applicable

Correction 2
Where the block coefficient (CB) exceeds 0.68, the tabular
freeboard specified in regulation 28 as modified, if applicable, by regulations
27(8), 27(10) and 29 shall be multiplied by the factor:
(CB+ 0.68)
1.36
Not Applicable
Correction 3
Where D exceeds L, the freeboard shall be increased by (D – L/15)
R mm, where R is L/0.48 at lengths less than 120 m and 250 at 120 m length
and above.
= (16. 8-(198.6/15)) *250
= 890mm

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

2.17. Stability Check

The preliminary stability check is done using the hull developed


and it is run on MAXSURF Stability software. The IMO criteria were given as
the required conditions and the GZ curve was also plotted. All the required
criteria were passed.
4 Stability
GZ Stability
3.1.2.4: Initial GMt GM at 0.0 deg = 3.698 m
3.1.2.4: GZ
Initial GMt GM at 0.0 deg = 3.698 m 3.1.2.5: Passenger crowding: a
Max GZ 3.1.2.4:
= 2.265 Initial GMtdeg.
m at 53.6 GM at 0.0 deg = 3.698 m
3
3.1.2.5: Passenger crowding: angle of
Max GZ = 2.265 m at 53.6 deg. equilibrium 3.1.2.6: Turn: angle of equilibrium
Max GZ = 2.265 m at 53.6 deg.
2

3.1.2.5: Passenger3.c1r.o2w.6d:inTgu:rna:ngalnegolef eoqf ueiqliubirliubmrium


GZ

-1

-2

-3

-4 -250
255075100125150175
Heel to Starboard deg.

Figure 2-15: GZ curve

Code Criteria Value Units Actual Status Margin


%
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.1: Area 3.1513 m.deg 26.5519 Pass +742.57
- Design 0 to 30
criteria
applicable to
all ships
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.1: Area 5.1566 m.deg 44.1717 Pass +756.61
- Design 0 to 40
criteria
applicable to
all ships
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.1: Area 1.7189 m.deg 17.6198 Pass +925.06
- Design 30 to 40

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

criteria
applicable to
all ships
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.2: Max 0.200 m 2.265 Pass +1032.5
- Design GZ at 30 or 0
criteria greater
applicable to
all ships
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.3: 25.0 deg 53.6 Pass +114.54
- Design Angle of
criteria maximum
applicable to GZ
all ships
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.4: 0.150 m 3.698 Pass +2365.3
- Design Initial GMt 3
criteria
applicable to
all ships
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.5: 10.0 deg 0.0 Pass +100.00
- Design Passenger
criteria crowding:
applicable to angle of
all ships equilibrium
A.749(18) Ch3 3.1.2.6: 10.0 deg 0.0 Pass +100.00
- Design Turn: angle
criteria of
applicable to equilibrium
all ships
Table 2-10:Stability Check with IMO criteria’s

2.18. Resistance Check

The resistance check was carried out using Gulhammer Harvald’s


method. All the basic requirement tests like Froude number, L/B ratio, Block
Coefficient, Slenderness ratio were initially checked and the obtained values
came under the permissible range. The total resistance at maximum speed of
25knots came out to be 1993.51kN. The power required hence calculated was
25636.61kW.
Total resistance – 1993.51kN
Power Required – 25636.61 kW

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

The initial power calculation from the graph of Gross Tonnage v/s
Power value came out to be 27840kW. Hence the preliminary resistance check
is satisfied as the difference is only a small value which can be neglected. The
calculation part of the resistance check has been attached in Appendix.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

CHAPTER 3
HULL GEOMETRY

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

3. HULL GEOMETRY

3.1. Overview

In this chapter the modelling of the hull and the generation of the
lines of the design has been explained. This will be a step for the stability
calculations in the upcoming sections. The following steps were followed for
the final construction of the model.
Step 1: The initial step of modelling is by importing the preliminary general
arrangement to Rhinoceroses 2021 software.

Figure 3-1: General Arrangement in RHINO

Step 2: The basic hull has been developed from the preliminary general
arrangement by arranging the decks one above the other and then lofting the
surface to obtain the complete model. The modelling was done in Rhinoceros
2021. Decks from 6 to 2 where selected for the hull development. A bulbous
was added using the Orca 3D plugin.

Figure 3-2: RHINO model from General Arrangement

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Step 3: The obtained model was transformed into the required model with
the dimensions as well particulars meeting the same as those were calculated in
the previous chapter. For this there was some changes done in the transom and
the obtained model is shown below in Figure 3-2. These changes where done
using the Orca 3D plugin.

Figure 3-3: Parametric Transformation in Orca 3D

Ship Hull Assistant in Orca 3D is used for the parametric


transformation. Here the proper dimensions of the bulbous bow, required hull
form shape etc were given as the inputs and the final model with the required
parameters and owners requirements were obtained. The final model is show
below in Figure 3-4.

Figure 3-4: Final Model in RHINO

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Step 4: The hull model made in Rhino was then exported and then used in
Maxsurf Modeller for further changes. Fig 3-5 shows the model when imported
to Maxsurf.

Figure 3-5:Model in Maxsurf

Step 5: The imported model is then verified for its particulars using the
functions in Maxsurf modeller. Here the calculated length, breadth and depth of
the vessel are given as input. The window below shows sizing of the required
surface.

Figure 3-6: Sizing of the model

Step 6: Parametric transformation was done to input the other parameters


such as CB, depth and verification of the previously obtained values was also
carried out.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 3-7: Parametric Transformation of the model

Step 7: The frame of reference was then set for obtaining the design
grid for the lines plan.

Figure 3-8:Setting Frame of Reference

Step 8: Now for obtaining the lines plan, the required number of stations,
waterlines and buttocks were given as input in the design grid. All half stations
and half waterlines where also included. The model was divided into 20stations
in length between the perpendiculars, 9 waterlines along the depth of the model

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

and 05 buttocks along the beam of the model. Figure below shows the design
grid for the model and also the all three views of the model after the design grid
has been set.

Figure 3-9:Design Grid

Figure 3-10:Lines Plan from Design Grid

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Step 9: Hydrostatic calculation, plotting of Bonjean curves etc are all don’t
through the offset values. The offset values are obtained directly from Maxsurf
modeller for the defined hull with the given design grid. The figure below
shows the offset calculation for station 20.

Figure 3-11: Offsets for station 20

Step 10: Fairing of the lines was done in AutoCAD and the model was
again checked for the hydrostatic particulars. The final particulars came out to
be those mentioned in the figure below. These were matching with
approximately with the previous calculations.

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

Figure 3-12: Hydrostatics at DWL

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

3.2. Faired Offsets

STN/
WL 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 LWL 4 5 6 7 8 MDK

stn 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.568 6.49 9.147 10.412 11.067 11.643 12.227 12.5

stn 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 6.968 8.05 9.759 10.728 11.265 11.757 12.261 12.5

stn 1 0 0 0 0 1.876 8.333 9.037 10.242 11 11.442 11.86 12.291 12.5

stn 1.5 0 0 0 0.675 4.967 9.238 9.731 10.638 11.236 11.601 11.953 12.318 12.5

stn 2 0 0 0 3.782 6.892 9.894 10.262 10.973 11.443 11.743 12.035 12.343 12.5

stn 3 0 0.423 4.448 7.218 9.008 10.812 11.048 11.506 11.788 11.984 12.177 12.387 12.5

stn 4 0 3.446 6.738 8.839 10.164 11.437 11.602 11.907 12.064 12.177 12.292 12.425 12.5

stn 5 0 4.636 7.855 9.745 10.854 11.862 11.988 12.201 12.278 12.329 12.387 12.457 12.5

stn 6 0 5.107 8.452 10.249 11.238 12.112 12.218 12.384 12.42 12.435 12.455 12.482 12.5

stn 7 0 5.438 8.79 10.502 11.417 12.221 12.316 12.462 12.484 12.485 12.489 12.495 12.5

stn 8 0 5.723 8.964 10.608 11.48 12.251 12.342 12.481 12.5 12.499 12.499 12.5 12.5

stn 9 0 6.016 9.064 10.648 11.499 12.257 12.347 12.482 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5

stn 10 0 6.25 9.123 10.663 11.503 12.258 12.348 12.482 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5

stn 11 0 6.384 9.167 10.678 11.509 12.26 12.349 12.483 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5

stn 12 0 6.417 9.195 10.697 11.519 12.263 12.352 12.483 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5

stn 13 0 6.347 9.194 10.708 11.529 12.268 12.355 12.484 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5

stn 14 0 6.167 9.121 10.669 11.504 12.256 12.345 12.479 12.498 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5

stn 15 0 5.894 8.89 10.455 11.312 12.117 12.219 12.388 12.443 12.468 12.482 12.492 12.5

stn 16 0 5.565 8.426 9.941 10.809 11.704 11.833 12.082 12.228 12.315 12.376 12.421 12.436

stn 17 0 5.185 7.738 9.113 9.955 10.936 11.099 11.46 11.752 11.951 12.099 12.22 12.262

stn 18 0 4.641 6.779 7.921 8.684 9.733 9.937 10.441 10.932 11.298 11.582 11.826 11.914
stn
18.5 0 3.954 5.935 6.982 7.718 8.823 9.053 9.66 10.302 10.802 11.194 11.529 11.649

stn 19 0 3.023 4.488 5.384 6.153 7.463 7.745 8.505 9.359 10.072 10.646 11.12 11.287
stn
19.5 0 2.33 3.153 3.521 3.659 5.238 5.698 6.814 7.939 8.925 9.788 10.5 10.747

stn 20 0 1.747 2.44 2.628 2.566 0 0.039 3.938 6.082 7.348 8.456 9.486 9.857

Table 3-1:Faired Offsets

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

3.3. Bonjean Areas and Moments

3.3.1. Bonjean Area Ordinates

STN/WL 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0 0 0 0 9.132333 37.667 76.98833 119.9727 165.39 213.1273
0.5 0 0 0 15.32833 49.38967 90.50767 134.5087 180.5487 228.5807
1 0 0 2.225 24.159 61.69267 104.282 149.174 195.7737 244.0713
1.5 0 0 10.166 39.533 79.55233 123.378 169.0563 216.16 264.6977
2 0 0 15.08067 49.29367 91.23067 136.1193 182.494 230.0447 278.7953
3 0 8.858667 36.68933 76.69933 121.4727 168.0893 215.6343 263.9507 313.073
4 0 14.58 49.10167 92.57133 139.3637 187.3203 235.8017 284.7337 334.1617
5 0 17.32867 55.41033 101.0653 149.2787 198.2453 247.457 296.885 346.569
6 0 18.79267 58.81 105.7107 154.7813 204.3963 254.1047 303.8823 353.754
7 0 19.63433 60.656 108.1197 157.5587 207.4577 257.3947 307.342 357.3093
8 0 20.07733 61.547 109.1893 158.7237 208.6923 258.69 308.6857 358.6833
9 0 20.33767 62.02267 109.7123 159.2593 209.2293 259.2293 309.2293 359.2293
10 0 20.49367 62.28733 109.9863 159.535 209.505 259.505 309.505 359.505
11 0 20.609 62.49133 110.2053 159.76 209.7317 259.7317 309.7317 359.7317
12 0 20.68033 62.635 110.3737 159.9333 209.905 259.905 309.905 359.905
13 0 20.67433 62.65233 110.4207 159.9913 209.9647 259.9647 309.9647 359.9647
14 0 20.488 62.28167 109.978 159.516 209.4757 259.4723 309.4723 359.4723
15 0 19.936 60.879 107.915 156.997 206.669 256.4947 306.396 356.3453
16 0 18.86633 57.83233 103.0307 150.68 199.3197 248.4143 297.8017 347.401
17 0 17.31633 53.11433 95.04867 139.918 186.373 233.796 281.905 330.552
18 0 15.18267 46.394 83.34167 123.762 166.5497 211.037 256.8103 303.6397
18.5 0 13.254 40.786 73.95733 110.9883 150.9597 193.2037 237.2147 282.6797
19 0 9.917 31.31733 58.63867 90.63733 126.4123 165.3207 206.79 250.3553
19.5 0 7.188333 20.45467 38.24967 62.504 92.05633 125.8253 163.3017 203.928
20 0 5.651333 16.56067 19.52467 27.99867 48.33133 75.244 106.878 142.788
Table 3-2: Bonjean Area Ordinates

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

3.3.2. Bonjean Moment Ordinates

STN/WL 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

0
0 0 0 54.794 301.336 769.8833 1439.672 2315.46 3410.037
0.5
0 0 0 91.97 395.1173 905.0767 1614.104 2527.681 3657.291
1
0 0 8.9 144.954 493.5413 1042.82 1790.088 2740.831 3905.141
1.5
0 0 40.664 237.198 636.4187 1233.78 2028.676 3026.24 4235.163
2
0 0 60.32267 295.762 729.8453 1361.193 2189.928 3220.625 4460.725
3
0 17.71733 146.7573 460.196 971.7813 1680.893 2587.612 3695.309 5009.168
4
0 29.16 196.4067 555.428 1114.909 1873.203 2829.62 3986.271 5346.587
5
0 34.65733 221.6413 606.392 1194.229 1982.453 2969.484 4156.39 5545.104
6
0 37.58533 235.24 634.264 1238.251 2043.963 3049.256 4254.353 5660.064
7
0 39.26867 242.624 648.718 1260.469 2074.577 3088.736 4302.788 5716.949
8
0 40.15467 246.188 655.136 1269.789 2086.923 3104.28 4321.599 5738.933
9
0 40.67533 248.0907 658.274 1274.075 2092.293 3110.752 4329.211 5747.669
10
0 40.98733 249.1493 659.918 1276.28 2095.05 3114.06 4333.07 5752.08
11
0 41.218 249.9653 661.232 1278.08 2097.317 3116.78 4336.243 5755.707
12
0 41.36067 250.54 662.242 1279.467 2099.05 3118.86 4338.67 5758.48
13
0 41.34867 250.6093 662.524 1279.931 2099.647 3119.576 4339.505 5759.435
14
0 40.976 249.1267 659.868 1276.128 2094.757 3113.668 4332.613 5751.557
15
0 39.872 243.516 647.49 1255.976 2066.69 3077.936 4289.544 5701.525
16
0 37.73267 231.3293 618.184 1205.44 1993.197 2980.972 4169.223 5558.416
17
0 34.63267 212.4573 570.292 1119.344 1863.73 2805.552 3946.67 5288.832
18
0 30.36533 185.576 500.05 990.096 1665.497 2532.444 3595.345 4858.235
18.5
0 26.508 163.144 443.744 887.9067 1509.597 2318.444 3321.005 4522.875
19
0 19.834 125.2693 351.832 725.0987 1264.123 1983.848 2895.06 4005.685
19.5
0 14.37667 81.81867 229.498 500.032 920.5633 1509.904 2286.223 3262.848
20
0 11.30267 66.24267 117.148 223.9893 483.3133 902.928 1496.292 2284.608
Table 3-3: Bonjean Moment Ordinates

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

3.3.3. Bonjean Curves

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

3.4. Hydrostatic Data

Draft/Particular 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Waterplane
Area 2374.115 3267.636 3748.103 3970.647 4060.664 4119.036 4169.797 4218.004

LCF -9.09706 -3.84469 0.86653 1.45626 1.27776 1.06783 0.96267 0.95232

3669274. 5920244.4 7759143.8 8782466.8 9264815.7 9584322.8 9860249.3 10118914.


MOI about LCF 092 04 63 09 14 58 94 62

MOIT 55140.59 123338.2 163859.2 184831.5 193873.9 200344 206517.5 212904

Volume
Displacement 2641.199 8356.153 15414.88 23155.71 31192.30 39373.27 47662.53 56050.76

Mass
Displacement 2707.229 8565.057 15800.25 23734.61 31972.11 40357.60 48854.09 57452.03

BML 1389.245 708.4891 503.3541 379.2785 297.0224 243.4220 206.8763 180.5312

BMT 20.87710 14.76017 10.62994 7.982113 6.215442 5.088324 4.332912 3.798414

TPC (salt water) 24.33468 33.49326 38.41805 40.69913 41.62181 42.2201 42.74042 43.23455
TPC (fresh
water) 23.74115 32.67636 37.48103 39.70647 40.60664 41.19036 41.69797 42.18004

LCB 9.558159 7.199539 4.363505 2.492315 1.497411 0.944506 0.605091 0.372405

KB 3.301948 4.501582 5.657889 6.779539 7.868749 8.936082 9.991594 11.0406

KMT 24.17905 19.26175 16.28783 14.76165 14.08419 14.02440 14.32450 14.83902

KML 1392.547 712.9907 509.0120 386.0580 304.8912 252.3581 216.8679 191.5718

CWP 0.856615 0.889689 0.921003 0.926194 0.920114 0.915624 0.918398 0.916621

CM 0.611745 0.708389 0.768415 0.814622 0.850816 0.87568 0.89344 0.90676

CB 0.476491 0.568789 0.631303 0.675163 0.706793 0.729360 0.749833 0.761280

CVP 0.556249 0.639311 0.685452 0.728965 0.768157 0.796571 0.816458 0.830528

CP 0.778905 0.802932 0.82156 0.828805 0.830723 0.832907 0.839266 0.839560

MTC 218.7394 352.9283 462.5521 523.5563 552.311 571.3580 587.8071 603.2271

MTC (salt) 224.2079 361.75158 474.11600 536.64529 566.11882 585.64203 602.50229 618.30782
Table 3-4: Hydrostatic data

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

3.4.1. Hydrostatic Curves

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

3.4.2. Curves of Form

Page |
Department of Ship Technology, CUSAT, B.Tech (NA&SB), Batch-XLIV

3.5. Conclusion

The suitable hull form has been generated and the displacement at
DWL was almost near to the displacement estimated during the preliminary
dimension fixing. From the nature of the smooth variation of the hydrostatic
curves it can be made clear that the hull is properly faired. A proper hand
drawing of the lines was also drawn using the traditional method. This
developed model can hence be used in the further sections for the respective
calculations.

Page |

You might also like