Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Downloaded

    Uploaded by

    RAVICHANDRAN Rajagopal
    6 views2 pages
    1. The petitioners sought anticipatory bail from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, apprehending arrest by the Dindigul District Crime Branch police for offenses of cheating and criminal intimidation. 2. It was not disputed that no FIR had been registered against the petitioners as of yet, and that only a police inquiry was pending against them. 3. The court directed that if an FIR is registered against the petitioners after the inquiry, they must be given notice to approach the appropriate court for anticipatory bail. The police were also directed to only issue written summons if they need to question the petitioners, and not orally summon them to the police station.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Downloaded (13)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1. The petitioners sought anticipatory bail from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, apprehending arrest by the Dindigul District Crime Branch police for offenses of cheating and criminal intimidation. 2. It was not disputed that no FIR had been registered against the petitioners as of yet, and that only a police inquiry was pending against them. 3. The court directed that if an FIR is registered against the petitioners after the inquiry, they must be given notice to approach the appropriate court for anticipatory bail. The police were also directed to only issue written summons if they need to question the petitioners, and not orally summon them to the police station.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Downloaded

    Uploaded by

    RAVICHANDRAN Rajagopal
    1. The petitioners sought anticipatory bail from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, apprehending arrest by the Dindigul District Crime Branch police for offenses of cheating and criminal intimidation. 2. It was not disputed that no FIR had been registered against the petitioners as of yet, and that only a police inquiry was pending against them. 3. The court directed that if an FIR is registered against the petitioners after the inquiry, they must be given notice to approach the appropriate court for anticipatory bail. The police were also directed to only issue written summons if they need to question the petitioners, and not orally summon them to the police station.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    CRL OP(MD). No.

    1409 of 2021

    BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT


    ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

    Date : 11/06/2021

    PRESENT

    The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

    CRL OP(MD). No.1409 of 2021

    1.K.Kannan
    2.K.Dinesh ... Petitioners/Accused

    Vs

    State by
    The Sub Inspector of Police,
    District Crime Branch,
    Dindigul.
    (Crime Number Not Known) ... Respondent/Complainant

    For Petitioners: Mr.K.Kannan,


    Advocate.
    For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthilkumar,
    Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

    PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

    PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. of 2021 on the file of


    the respondent police.

    ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

    Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the
    learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side)appearing for the respondent.

    2. The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the


    respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 420 and
    506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.Not Known of 2021 on the file of the
    respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

    3. It is not in dispute that as on date, no FIR has been


    registered against the petitioners. It is admitted that petition
    enquiry is pending. If at the end of enquiry, the respondent
    registers any FIR against the petitioners, the petitioners will be
    put on notice, so that, the petitioners will have breathing time to
    move the concerned Court for the relief of anticipatory bail. There
    is no question of orally summoning the petitioners to the police
    station for enquiry. If the respondent wants to enquire the
    petitioners, only written summons will be issued.
    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

    1/2
    CRL OP(MD). No.1409 of 2021

    4.With this direction to the respondent, this Criminal Original


    Petition is disposed of.
    sd/-
    11/06/2021
    / TRUE COPY /

    / /2021
    Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
    Madurai - 625 023.

    Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic,


    a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but,
    ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct
    copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant
    concerned.

    TO
    1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
    DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH,
    DINDIGUL.

    2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,


    MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,
    MADURAI.

    ORDER
    IN
    CRL OP(MD) No.1409 of 2021
    Date :11/06/2021
    cp
    MS/PN/SAR-2/18.06.2021/2P.3C

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

    2/2

    You might also like