Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Every teacher is an action researcher. Everyone can do it. Teachers and students can do it together.
This episode focuses on doing action research as one of the roles of the teacher. Every teacher
should take interest to know how students learn, wants to make innovation in the curriculum and
desires to improve teaching practice. In order to achieve this, a teacher has to do action research on
the everyday practical problems. This problematic situation and observe discrepancies emerge
between what is intended and what actually offers in the classroom.
There is a general agreement among action research community that action research as about
ACTION: taking action to improve practice and RESEARCH: finding things out and coming to a new
understanding that create a new knowledge.
Action research is not new. It dates back to the time of John Dewey in 1920 when he introduced
the idea of inquiry. This was followed by Collier, 1945; Lewin, 1949; Corey, 1953; and many others
who came later. Schon introduced the notion of action research as a habit of continuing inquiry.
Inquiry begins with situations that are problematic, confusing, uncertain, and conflicting, and so does
Action Research.
It was Stephen Corey (1953) who defined action research as the process through which
practitioners like teachers, study their own practice to solve their personal or professional practical
problems. Further on, John Illiot in 1993 clarified that action research is concerned with everyday ,
practical problems experienced by the teachers, rather than the theoretical problems defined by pure
researchers.
Action research is grounded on the reality of the school, classroom, teachers, and students.
Sometimes, it is labeled as Teacher Action Research (TAR) but is popularly known simply as Action
Research (AR).
Action research is the process that allows teacher to study their own classrooms, schools, and
educational setting in order to understand them better and to improve their quality and effectiveness.
The processes of observation, reflection, and inquiry lead to action that makes a difference in the
teaching-learning. It bridges doing (practice0 and learning (study) and reflection (inquiry).
You must have experience in your past subjects, doing some activities or accomplishing
tasks similar to an action research. These are activities that required you to do Reflection and
Make Action or the other way around. Schon (1987) distinguishes Reflection in Action or
Reflection on Action as two different things.
1. Make a library or online research of the different Completed Action Research Titles
Conducted by Teachers.
3. Submit a list of three (3) titles of completed Action Research Studies to your mentor as
reference.
Based on the activity on Making a List of Completed Action Research Titles, let’s find
out what you have noticed by answering the following questions.
Questions My Answer
If YES, identify
the problems
from the title 2. Identify problem to be solved in title No. 2
you have given.
(answer in the It was observed by the researcher that during the Science class,
space provided learners showed low interests and attention to science lesson. The
below) researcher compared the MPS of first grading and the MPS of second
grading and he noticed that the MPS of the pupils was intensibly
decreasing. Thus, with the alarming condition of the apparent MPS
results and observed scenario in the classroom, the researcher
developed a technique in utilizing infographics materials. The
researcher opted that it is very timely to conduct an action research
to test if the technique on utilization of infographic materials would
increase the awareness of the pupils in global warming. The
researcher used "Present-Engage-Build Utilization Technique" in
presenting the infographic materials during the teaching learning
process.
3. Identify problem to be solved in title No. 3.
3. Write the title For the title in action research no. 1, no. 2, no. 3, I think the study was
and your related to teaching and learning, curriculum and assessment as well
interpretation of as the learner’s cognitive and affective needs. The researchers of the
the study from AR used an idea of their title to develop principles and theories to
the title guide their practice. All the title summarizes the main ideas of their
study, comprised of a brief statement that best reflect the original
and gripping aspects of their study and the title really captured the
readers’ attention because their titles discusses special ethical
viewpoints that the researcher has to take into consideration when
conducting action research in the classroom.
4. What do you I think the three authors were developed practical solutions to
think did the address the problems quickly and efficiently. They create a simple,
author/s do practical, repeatable process of learning, evaluation, and
with the improvement that leads to increasingly better results for schools, or
identified programs. They identify a problem to be studied and they develop a
problem as plan to address the said problem.
presented in
their titles?
A. ANALYZE
Key Questions My Answer
Choose from the options given. You may check more
than one answer.
1. Form what source do you think did Choices:
the authors identify the problems of ______ Copied from research books
their action research? ___/___ From daily observation of their teaching practice.
___/___ From difficulties they observed of their learners.
___/___ From their own personal experience
______ From the told experiences of their co-teachers.
2. What do you think is the teachers Choices:
intention in conducting the action ___/___ To find a solution to the
research? problematic situation
______ To comply with the requirement of
the principal
___/___ To improve teaching practice
___/___ To try out something, if it works
______ To prove oneself as better than the
others
3. What benefit do you get as a student Choices:
in FS 2 in understanding and doing ___/___ Prepare for my future job
action research? ______ Get good grades in the course
___/___ Learn and practice being an action
researcher
___/___ Improve my teaching practice
___/___ Exposure to the realities in
teaching profession
___/___ Become a better teacher everyday
4. In what ways can you assist your Choices:
mentor in his/her Action Research ___/___ By co-researching with my
Activity? mentor
___/___ By assisting in the design of the
intervention
____/__ By assisting tin the
implementation of the AR
______ By just watching what is being
done
B. REFLECT
Based on the readings you made and the previous activities that you have done,
1. What significant ideas or concepts have you learned about action research?
I learned that activity inquire about handle can offer assistance us get it what is
happening in our classroom and recognize changes that progress instructing and learning.
Activity inquire about can offer assistance reply questions you have got around the adequacy
of particular directions procedures, the execution of particular understudies, and classroom
administration techniques. Action inquire about too makes a difference you take charge of
your individual proficient improvement. As you reflect on your claim actions and watch other
ace instructors, you'll recognize the abilities and procedures you'd like to include to your claim
professional toolbox. As you investigate potential arrangements and are uncovered to new
thoughts, you'll distinguish the abilities, administration, and guidelines preparing required to
form the changes you need to see.
2. Have you realized that there is a need to be an action researcher as a future teacher?
Yes _____
No _____
3. Plan
What strategies, activities, innovations can I employ to improve the situation or solve the
problem?
As a future action researcher, I can plan for an appropriate intervention like
Focalized Considering can be thought of as straight and orderly in its approach. It
endeavors to discover a arrangement to a issue by narrowing down numerous
thoughts into a single arrangement. In the event that focalized considering can be
thought of as inquiring a single address, that address would be ‘Why?’
Divergent Considering centers more on the era of numerous thoughts and on the
associations between those thoughts. It sees issues as plan openings and empowers
the utilize of assets and materials in unique ways. Dissimilar considering energizes
the taking of inventive dangers and is adaptable instead of explanatory in its
approach. In case it was a single address, it’d be ‘Why not?’ In which it can offer
assistance more to student,to make more imaginatively as they needed to.Because a
few of the understudies are bashful and dont have sufficient certainty to battle
it.Thats why this are a few arrange that we ought to do.
4. Act
If I conduct or implement my plan, what can be its title?
If I will implement my doable plan in the future, my title would be
*If you have a dream, don’t just sit there. Gather courage to believe
that you can succeed and leave no stone unturned to make it a reality.”
Subjects
Teacher-student relationships
Off-task behaviors and engagement
Education -- Research papers (Graduate).
Abstract
This research explores relationships in schools, specifically interactions between teachers and
students. Initially, the research examined an overview of teacher-student relationships and
factors that contribute to these interactions. This overview included both teacher and student
perceptions and personal characteristics and then examined the effects of teacher-student
relationships on education and how teacher and student behaviors affect educational
outcomes. The overview of the research literature concluded with how to develop positive
relationships. Teacher expectations, attitude, familiarity, and communication all play a role in
cultivating relationships in the classroom environment.
The purpose of the research was to determine if improving relationships between teachers
and students would decrease off-task behaviors during class.The intervention involved four
weeks of initiatives focused on developing improved teacher-student relationships. The mean
number of off-task behaviors per student during the weighted baseline period (Mean = 44.33,
SD = 14.89) was significantly higher than the mean number of off-task behaviors during the
intervention period (Mean = 31.08, SD = 9.68) [t(11) = 5.90, p < .001]. As the data was
significant, the null hypothesis was rejected.