Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Have you ever wondered what’s behind the curtains in the elusive power industry?
Change slide
Where and how are waste products disposed?
And is this system efficient? And if not is there anything we can do about it
Change slide
My name is Fiona Fraser and today ill be be answering these questions and providing a solution to the
problem encountered. And who knows maybe in return well all benefit with reduced electricity bills!
Change slide
Introduction
The generation, processing, and disposal of waste is a historical one. These challenges have
continued to plague us to the extent that now the modernized man has observed a linear
relationship between waste generation and economic development.
The Power generation industry is one of the industries that continues to experience challenges in
the processing and disposal of their petroleum waste products. One of the most prevalent wastes
generated in the oil industry is what is referred to as oily sludge. This oily sludge is generated
from the Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) or bunker C that is used by the GPL INC in the generation of
electricity.
Kingston 1power plant has a generating capacity of 22 MW and produces approximately 4000
Imperial gallons of oily sludge per month. This oily sludge is disposed of at this plant Inc. via
incineration. The Atlas 1200 SL BWS incinerator with a diesel adding system was introduced to
a number of locations including the Kingston 1 power plant to alleviate the accumulation of this
waste.(should have pictures).My proposal is based on implementing a heat recovery system by
designing an optimal heat exchanger to be retrofitted to this incinerator to covert waste heat into
useful work
Change slide
So what is the problem?
This marine Atlas incinerator currently is the main means of disposing the accumulated oily
sludge. However, this incinerator release exhaust gases at high temperature (250oC-300 oC) along
with harmful gases such as Sulphur dioxide, NOx and the famous carbon dioxide into the air.
This increases environmental impacts
and the energy that could potentially be converted to useful work is wasted.
Additionally, the heat requirements for the Kingston 1 power plant is currently supplied by the
auxiliary boiler and the exhaust boiler. Now, this auxiliary boiler requires diesel for its operation
which increases fuel consumption
and the exhaust boilers can only supply the plant heat requirements during engine operation
which can result in total plant shut down in the event of a failure during scheduled or
unscheduled maintenance. The heat requirements for a typical HFO fired powered plant are
Cooling water
Feedwater system
Change slide
Main Objectives
To investigate the potential for increased process efficiency of the Atlas Marine
incinerator at GPL Inc (Kingston 1) using rejected heat, thereby reducing costs and minimizing
To design a cost-effective heat recovery system (heat exchanger) for the marine
Change slide
Specific objectives
To determine the most cost-effective heat exchanger for waste heat recovery from
To design the most efficient heat recovery system for optimal heat recovery
To identify the advantages and disadvantages of a waste heat recovery system taking
Change slide
Literature review
Waste Heat
The significance of energy efficiency is profound as it is a central subject in energy science and
is also an important concern of economic and political actors. For instance, the International
Energy Agency (IEA) anticipates that over 50 percent of CO2 emissions can be avoided through
energy efficiency. One way to boost the value-added per unit of energy expended is to use the
excess heat from the process to generate additional services like electricity or space heating.
Reciprocating engines are able to achieve efficiencies of approximately 30% . Therefore a large
amount of the input energy is not converted into useful energy, this waste energy (about 48%) is
given off through the exhaust system. This waste energy is diverted to the lube oil system (27
%) and 25 % through the cooling system via the water jacket. The highest temperatures and
The recovery of waste heat can be facilitated by indirect means (without heat exchanger), or
indirectly i.e with the aid of a heat exchanger. The method used in this instance is indirect heat
recovery. This is where the two fluids are separated by a heat transfer surface that can be either
active or passive.
HEAT EXCHANGERS
Heat exchangers are the main machines used to transfer energy from one fluid to another
fluid at various temperatures and this improves energy efficiency within the operating systems.
In designing an efficient heat exchanger several things must be addressed such as source
temperature, material requirements, corrosive contaminants in source stream and source pressure
drops.
Change slide
The shell and tube heat exchanger are one of the most commonly and popularly used heat
exchanger due to its flexibility in various applications. It is split into two main systems i.e the
shell side and the tube side. The two sides each have a flowing medium, with the cooling fluid
entering the tubes and the hot fluid entering the shell. These two mediums are not mixed during
the process since the tubes prevents this and such indirect cooling occurs, heat is then transferred
between the shell and tube because they are in contact thermally.
These heat exchangers are categorized according to flow and number of passes in tubes.
These are the parallel, counter and cross flow, the heat exchangers are usually comprised of a
Change slide
Advantages
The advantages of the shell and tube heat exchanger is usually mirrored against the plate
heat exchanger because these are the most common heat exchangers in industries.
that cleaning periods may be shorter than on other heat exchange devices.
They are cheap and have a long service life which only requires minimum
maintenance.
It is better able to handle pressure drop than parallel plate heat exchangers and are
Studies carried out by ( Teke, Agra, Atayılmaz, & Demir, 2009) shows that the most
efficient heat exchanger type is the counter-flow heat exchanger which has the highest value of
net gains equal to US$1,383,497. The counter-flow heat exchanger was also found to be the most
efficient.
Methodology
Site inspection for general data on required pipe duct lengths and availability of
and fuel.
Gathering of data for sludge production over an extended period and other
information
Literature on design concepts and calculations for shell and tube heat exchanger and
Carrying out a site survey to gather data on outlet temperature of exhaust gas, inlet
temperature of cooling water and the heat capacity flow rates for the exhaust gas and water.
performance history
Determine the log mean temperature difference, heat rate (q) and correction factor
Iterate
Check the power consumption i.e the power it takes to force the flow through the
Iterate
3.4 Economic analysis
Change slide
Anticipated benefits
It is expected that the implementation of this waste heat recovery system will align
with GPL Inc. overall strategic objective, of providing reliable service to its customers and
reducing/ maintaining operating costs. This waste heat recovery system will directly impact
3) Reduce total dependence on exhaust heat recovery system of gensets in the event
Testing
Transportation
Utility
Total $88,300
Waste Heat Recovery System
Kingston
Project Lead 2/15/21
Project Start:
1 Feb 15, 2021 Feb 22, 2021 Mar 1, 2021 Mar 8, 2021 Mar 15, 2021 Mar 22, 2021 Mar 29, 2021 Apr 5, 2021 Apr 12, 2021 Apr 19, 2021
Display Week:
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
ASSIGNED
TASK PROGRESS START END DAYS M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S
TO
It is expected that the implementation of this waste heat recovery system will align with GPL
Inc. overall objective of providing reliable service to its customers and reducing/ maintaining
operating costs.
Conclusion
In conclusion It is expected that the implementation of this waste heat recovery system will align
with GPL Inc. overall strategic objective of providing reliable service to its customers and
reducing/ maintaining operating costs which in turn will be beneficial for us as a country.