Name: Nikki T.

Orito

Section: BEE-II

What learning theories are most compatible with multiliteracy framework?

The multiliteracy viewpoint promotes the use of a range of literacy techniques, including verbal,

visual, auditory, gestural, spatial, and multimodal ones, to learn and communicate. We read letters, but

when we read, we also comprehend the order in which they are arranged to convey meaning. We are no

longer just readers in the world of technology; we are also users and navigators. Reading now involves

more than just understanding words; it also involves juggling various modes of understanding. As we deal

with technology and its electronic settings, which represent the biggest paradigm shift in the history of

literacy. Some claim that technology will shape our future, but this is untrue; it already has. Due to

technology and globalization, the ability to connect has expanded into previously unimaginable spheres of

communication. Global brevity necessitates new approaches to and discussions of sociocultural concerns.

Due to the ability to move between and among various points of view and ways of thinking, engagement

and learning can become a more pluralistic experience rich in critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

I have grounds to believe that cognitivism, behaviorism, and constructivism are based on epistemological

traditions that aim to address how a person learns; cognitivism emphasizes "Wisdom is considered as

symbolic in cognitive theories," whereas behaviorism focuses more on behavior should be focused on

simple elements: specific stimuli and responses.

Finally, constructivism proposes that learners create knowledge as they try to understand their

experiences. This trio of ideas fits the narrative of multiliteracies in all of its forms and nuances as earning

principles and processes, should be reflective of underlying social environments. Learning is the process

through which these symbolic representations are committed to memory in the learner's mind. These

theories don't deal with learning that takes place when no humans are around, learning that is recorded
and altered by technology. They also fail to describe how learning takes place within corporations.

However they deserve merit for their specifics. Any strong pedagogical theory must be based on

assumptions about how the human mind works in society and in the classroom, as well as the nature of

teaching and learning. While we believe that no current theory in psychology, education, or social

sciences has "the answers," and that concepts from many domains must always be combined. Pedagogy is

a teaching-learning interaction that has the potential to create learning situations that lead to full and

equitable social participation.