Research Title:

Name of Researcher/s: Presentation Date:

CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH OUTPUT PRESENTATION Remarks/Suggestions
1. The situation analysis portrays the problem in the global, national,
regional and local context.
2. There is justification of what generated interest & motivation on
the part of the researcher to focus his study on the problem
situation.
3. The literature review follows a thematic presentation in the form of
a documented extended essay consistent with the stated research
problem.
4. There is a discussion of the merits of the theories that explain,
support, and validate the problem and that provide a guide to the
intended methodology.
5. Variables, and phenomena used in the study and their relations are
identified and discussed.
6. Terms are operationally defined on the context of the research
study.
7. A schematic representation of the interrelationship of variables is
presented in a paradigm.
8. A set of assumptions serving as the basis for asking specific
questions on the problem is stated .
9. The problem is generally stated, and a compelling argument of the
research’s importance is presented and discussed.
10. Specific problems stated are logically congruent to the general
problem.
11. The research hypotheses and assumptions are consistent with
specific problems,
12. A narrative of the significance of the study in terms of what it
intends to contribute, what benefits would be derived, and who are
to be benefited by the study is presented.
13. A narrative description of parameters, coverage, limitations, and
constraints in the conduct of the study is identified.
14. A narrative description of the research methodology and design
used, the rationale for its selection, and a schematic flow of the
research process are presented.
15. A narrative description of the sample and the sampling process and
a tabular and narrative presentation of the attributes of the locale or
sample population is presented
16. Data gathering tools are identified and described appropriately.
Proposed data gathering strategies are apt for the research
objectives.
17. Data collection process is aptly described.
18. The data gathering procedures used in the study is described and
 explicated. A schematic presentation of the research workflow
process is provided.
19. The Data Analysis / treatment of data plan is clearly presented. The
importance of using such design is explained. The process/steps of
the data analysis phase are discussed aptly.
20. Theoretical grounding/ Philosophical Underpinnings are discussed
appropriately. The congruence of said Theoretical/Philosophical
basis to the research study is aptly presented.
21. Strategies for conducting an ethical research is presented. Plans to
establish Research rigor and trustworthiness is explained.
22. Research results are summarized and presented and explicated
accurately.
23. Trends and patterns observed in the study are explicated.
Relationship of variables and Themes and Subthemes are discussed
appropriately.
24. Literature scoping is adequately done. Results of past research
studies that are congruent with the findings are presented.
25. Inferences , meanings, and implications from analyzed data are
corroborated by sound data analysis and interpretation.
26. Detailed explanation of the meaning of the study results and its
implication to the discipline or industry are presented and discussed
appropriately
27. Summary of results are presented accurately and in an organized
fashion.
28. Conclusions are logically rooted in the summary of results, and are
explicated appropriately.
29. Recommendations are congruent with the conclusions made.
30. A narrative discussion of how the researcher’s perspective has
changed in the context of their personal biases towards the study is
explained. (Qualitative Study)
31. List of References conform to the set guidelines. Intext citations are
reflected in the Reference List, vice-versa.
32. Appendices of the Research Report are complete and organized
according to set guidelines.
33. Abstract of the study aptly highlights salient points and features of
the research study, and is written succinctly and concisely.
Do you approve the research output? Yes____ No: ________
What additional requirements are needed for the approval of the research output?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Research Output Evaluator:

_________________________
(Signature over Printed Name)

MIDWIFERY ROLES AND PRACTICES OF RURAL HEALTH MIDWIVES OF ILOCOS

SUR: A MIXED METHODS PERSPECTIVE

_____________________

A Thesis

Presented to the faculty

Of the Ilocos Sur Community College

[Insert Department Name Here]

____________________

In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Degree

[Insert Course Here]

__________________

Submitted by:

Dela Cruz, Juan T.

February 2022
 INDORSEMENT

This thesis entitled, MIDWIFERY ROLES AND PRACTICES OF RURAL

HEALTH MIDWIVES OF ILOCOS SUR: A MIXED METHODS PERSPECTIVE,
prepared and submitted by DELA CRUZ, JUAN T., in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MIDWIFERY, has been
examined and is recommended for acceptance and approval for Oral Examination.

This is to certify further that DELA CRUZ, JUAN T., ….. are ready for Oral Examination.

____________________________
JEFF LEIGH T. REBURON, PhD, RM, RN
Adviser
 General Criterion for Research Output/Proposal
Presentation
Name of Students: Date of Presentation:

Research Adviser:

Instructions to the Panel:

Using the grading scale given below, fill in the grade for all the areas listed. Multiply each area
by the given constants. The sum total of the three weighted area grades is the given grade to the group.
No rounding-off to the nearest integer shall be done at this stage.

The text of the Research Output as written (70%)

1. The Mechanics of the text (30%)
a. General Appearance, including the typing
b. Spelling, grammar, syntax
c. Critical Apparatus (Referencing, bibliography, appendices, in-text citations, formatting)
Area Grade:_______ X 0.3 = ___________

2. Organization of the Research Output (40%)

a. Coherence and consistency (unity of ideas)
b. Clarity of expression and propriety of emphases
c. Unity of structure (from the background to the objectives and purpose statement)
d. Logic of Presentation
Area Grade:_______ X 0.4 = ___________

Oral Presentation of the Research Results (30%)

1. Mastery of the Research Process and Results (20%)
a. Clarity of points presented
b. Quality of justification or argumentation
c. Use of quality evidence Area Grade:_______ X 0.2 = ___________

2. Researcher Professionalism (10%)

a. Appearance/ Posture
b. Decorum Area Grade:_______ X 0.1 = ___________

Grand Total = ___________

__________________________
Research Panel Member

Jeff Leigh Taay Reburon, RM, RN, Ph.D.

Research Instructor
July 13, 2021

Dr. Arnel Castro Doctolero

College Administrator
Ilocos Sur Community College

Dear Sir:

We, the undersigned Bachelor of Science in Midwifery candidates of Ilocos Sur Community
College- Health Science Department, conducted a research entitled “FACTORS AFFECTING THE
ACCEPTABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL FAMILY PLANNING METHOD AMONG MEN OF
REPRODUCTIVE AGE IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF SAN ILDEFONSO, ILOCOS SUR” as a
terminal requirement for R.S. Midwifery subject. Our research undertaking aimed to determine and
ascertain the acceptability of artificial contraception along with factors that may affect such
acceptability. In this regard, may we respectfully ask your good office to allow us to present our research
output on July 19, 2020, 1:00 pm, at the ISCC Midwifery Laboratory. May we also request your good
office to allow the following faculty members to serve as our research panel members.

Chairman: Mr. Limuel V. Dolorico

Panel 1(Internal): Mrs. Marie Cecille Liberty S. Varilla
Panel 2 (External): Mr. Paul Mark P. Pilar
Critic: Mr. Bhert Keane Q. Pugrad
Statistician: Mrs. Joireyna R. Rafanan
Adviser: Mr. James R. Taiza
Secretary: Dr. Jeff Leigh T. Reburon

We promise to observe minimum health standards and to practice social distancing during our face-
to-face defense. We fervently hope for your positive response regarding this matter. Thank you very much
and more power!

Respectfully Yours,

Jovelyn T. Rin
Leslie T. Puzon
Lotlot G. Hortizuela
Allen Jean A. Riambon
Romelyn P. Dela Cruz
ISCC BSM4 Student Researchers

Recommending Approval:

Mr. Limuel V. Dolorico

Midwifery Principal
Approved:

Arnel Castro Doctolero

College Administrator
Research Title:
Name of Researcher/s: Date & Time:
Criteria for Research Proposal Remarks/Suggestions
1. The situation analysis portrays the problem in the global, national,
regional and local context.
2. There is justification of what generated interest & motivation on
the part of the researcher to focus his study on the problem
situation.
3. The literature review follows a thematic presentation in the form of
a documented extended essay consistent with the stated research
problem.
4. There is a discussion of the merits of the theories that explain,
support, and validate the problem and that provide a guide to the
intended methodology.
5. Variables, and phenomena used in the study and their relations are
identified and discussed.
6. Terms are operationally defined on the context of the research
study.
7. A schematic representation of the interrelationship of variables is
presented in a paradigm.
8. A set of assumptions serving as the basis for asking specific
questions on the problem is stated .
9. The problem is generally stated, and a compelling argument of the
research’s importance is presented and discussed.
10. Specific problems stated are logically congruent to the general
problem.
11. The research hypotheses and assumptions are consistent with
specific problems,
12. A narrative of the significance of the study in terms of what it
intends to contribute, what benefits would be derived, and who are
to be benefited by the study is presented.
13. A narrative description of parameters, coverage, limitations, and
constraints in the conduct of the study is identified.
14. A narrative description of the research methodology and design
used, the rationale for its selection, and a schematic flow of the
research process are presented.
15. A narrative description of the sample and the sampling process and
a tabular and narrative presentation of the attributes of the locale or
sample population is presented
16. Data gathering tools are identified and described appropriately.
Proposed data gathering strategies are apt for the research
objectives.
17. Data collection process is aptly described.
18. The data gathering procedures used in the study is described and
 explicated. A schematic presentation of the research workflow
process is provided.
19. The Data Analysis / treatment of data plan is clearly presented. The
importance of using such design is explained. The process/steps of
the data analysis phase are discussed aptly.
20. Theoretical grounding/ Philosophical Underpinnings are discussed
appropriately. The congruence of said Theoretical/Philosophical
basis to the research study is aptly presented.
21. Strategies for conducting an ethical research is presented. Plans to
establish Research rigor and trustworthiness is explained.
22. List of References conform to the set guidelines. Intext citations are
reflected in the Reference List, vice-versa.

Do you approve the research proposal?___________________________

What additional requirements are needed for the approval of the research proposal?

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

Research Proposal Evaluator:

_________________________
(Signature over Printed Name)
 C. WORKFLOW PROCESS FOR SCHEDULING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL

FOR UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH PROPOSALS

 The undergraduate researchers shall signify their intent to do a Research Proposal
through a letter of Intent addressed to the ISCC Research Office.
 The Research Instructor shall determine if the undergraduate Research Manuscript is
ready for Research Proposal based on the Research Proposal Checklist.
 The Research Instructor shall coordinate with their Department Research Focal Person.
 Both the Research Instructor and the Department Research Focal Person shall form the
Research Panel for the Proposal Defense based on the Roster of Qualified Faculty
Researchers.
 The Department Research Focal Person and the Research Instructor shall schedule the
Proposal Defense based on the availability of the Panel members.
 The Department Research Focal Person and the Research Instructor shall attach the
Proposal Defense Evaluation Form as Front Page of the Research Manuscript.
 The undergraduate researchers shall distribute their Proposal Manuscript to the Panel
Members at least 5 days before the day of Proposal Defense.

FACULTY RESEARCH PROPOSALS

 The faculty researchers shall signify their intent to conduct a research study through a
letter of Intent addressed to the Department Head.
 The Department Head shall determine if the faculty Research Manuscript is aligned with
the Department’s research thrusts.
 Once approved, the Department Head shall endorse the Research Manuscript to the
Department Research Focal Person. The Department Research Focal Person shall then
determine if the Research Manuscript is ready for Research Proposal based on the
Research Proposal Checklist.
 The Department Research Focal Person shall forward the request letter to the ISCC
Research Office.
 The ISCC Research Coordinator and the Department Head shall form the Research Panel
for the Faculty Proposal Defense based on the Roster of Qualified Faculty Researchers.
 The Department Research Focal Person and the Faculty Researcher shall schedule the
Faculty Proposal Defense based on the availability of the Panel members.
 The Department Research Focal Person and the Faculty Researcher shall attach the
Proposal Defense Evaluation Form as Front Page of the Research Manuscript.
 The faculty researcher shall distribute their Proposal Manuscript to the Panel Members at
least 5 days before the day of Proposal Defense.
 WORKFLOW PROCESS FOR SCHEDULING A RESEARCH DEFENSE

FOR UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH THESIS

 The undergraduate researchers shall signify their intent to do a THESIS DEFENSE

through a letter of Intent addressed to the ISCC Research Office.
 The Research Instructor shall determine if the undergraduate Research Thesis Manuscript
is ready for THESIS DEFENSE based on the THESIS DEFENSE Checklist. (See
Appendix)
 The Research Instructor shall coordinate with their Department Research Focal Person.
 Both the Research Instructor and the Department Research Focal Person shall form the
Research Panel for the THESIS Defense based on the Roster of Qualified Faculty
Researchers.
 The Department Research Focal Person and the Research Instructor shall schedule the
THESIS Defense based on the availability of the Panel members.
 The Department Research Focal Person and the Research Instructor shall attach the
THESIS Defense Evaluation Form as Front Page of the Research Manuscript.
 The undergraduate researchers shall distribute their Proposal Manuscript to the Panel
Members at least 5 days before the day of Thesis Defense.

FACULTY RESEARCH PROPOSALS

 The faculty researchers shall signify their intent to conduct a RESEARCH DEFENSE
through a letter of Intent addressed to the ISCC Research Office through the Department
Focal Person.
 The Department Research Focal Person shall then determine if the Research Manuscript
is ready for Research Proposal based on the Research DEFENSE Checklist. (See
Appendix)
 The Department Research Focal Person shall forward the request letter and Final
Manuscript to the ISCC Research Office.
 The ISCC Research Coordinator shall form the Research Panel for the Faculty
RESEARCH Defense based on the Roster of Qualified Faculty Researchers.
 The Department Research Focal Person and the Faculty Researcher shall schedule the
Faculty RESEARCH Defense based on the availability of the Panel members.
 The Department Research Focal Person and the Faculty Researcher shall attach the
Proposal Defense Evaluation Form as Front Page of the Research Manuscript.
 The faculty researcher shall distribute their Research Manuscript to the Panel Members at
least 5 days before the day of Research Defense.
 RESEARCH ADVISERSHIP ACCEPTANCE FORM

I, the undersigned faculty of Bachelor of Science in Midwifery of Ilocos Sur Community

College - Health Science Department of, hereby accept:

______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________

as my Research Advisees in their undergraduate thesis entitled:

“_____________________________________________________________________”.

As a research adviser, I accept the following responsibilities:

1. Regularly meet with my research advisees for consultation of the manuscript and progress
tracking;

2. Assist my research advisees in the use of Critical Apparatus (Referencing, bibliography,

appendices, in-text citations, formatting) based on institutional guidelines;

3. Guide my students in writing a rigorous and trustworthy research manuscript that reports
results that are truthful and free from academic dishonesty;

4. Help improve the manuscript’s contents, including spelling, grammar, and syntax;

5. Monitor, score and evaluate my research advisees based on the grading rubrics provided;

6. Meet with the Department Research Focal Person to ensure that the undergraduate thesis is
aligned and up to par with the standards and format of the institution;

7. Help form a Research Panel for my research advisees’ proposal/ defense.

_______________________________________
Name and Signature of Research Adviser
Department

Noted:
___________________________________ ___________________________________
Midwifery Research Instructor Department Research
Focal Person

RESEARCH PROPOSAL CHECKLIST

Title of Research Study:

Name of Advisees:

This is to certify that I, the undersigned, authorize the students bearing this letter to be
scheduled for Research Proposal. My signatures further certify that I have read the different sub-
parts of the research manuscript and have adequately guided my research advisees to write their
research manuscript in conformity with our institution’s guidelines and standards.

Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION Y N Chapter 2. METHODOLOGY Y N

Background of the Study Research Methodology
Operational Definition of Terms Research Design
Review of Related Literature Locale, Population and Sample
Theoretical Framework (Quanti)
Review of Related Literature Setting and Participants (Quali)
Clinching paragraph presenting Data Gathering Tools
the Problem Data Gathering Procedures
The Problem Data Management and Analysis
Statement of the Problem/ Theoretical Underpinnings
Research Objectives (Quanti)
General Objectives Philosophical Underpinnings
Specific Objectives (Quali)
Conceptual Framework Ethical Considerations
Assumptions (other inclusions for Qualitative
Hypothesis Studies)
Scope and Delimitations of the Bracketing / Researchers’
Study Background
Significance of the Study Establishing Trustworthiness

REFERENCE LIST Y N
APPENDICES
Sample Communication letters /
study-site Approval
Informed Consent Form (WHO) Prepared by:
Interview Guide (Qualitative) _________________
Sample Questionnaire Name and Signature
Research Adviser
 (Quantitative)
List of study sites, Population,
Sample

RESEARCH OUTPUT CHECKLIST

Title of Research Study:

Name of Advisees:

This is to certify that I, the undersigned, authorize the students bearing this letter to be
scheduled for Research Presentation. My signatures further certify that I have read the different
sub-parts of the research manuscript and have adequately guided my research advisees to write
their research manuscript in conformity with our institution’s guidelines and standards.

Preliminaries Y N Research Methodology

Title Page Research Design
Table of Contents Locale, Population and Sample (Quanti)
Summary of Tables and Figures Setting and Participants (Quali)
Indorsement Form Data Gathering Tools
Approval Form Data Gathering Procedures
Dedication Data Management and Analysis
Acknowledgement Theoretical Underpinnings (Quanti)
Philosophical Underpinnings (Quali)
Abstract
Ethical Considerations
Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION Y N
(other inclusions for Qualitative Studies)
Background of the Study
Bracketing / Researchers’ Background
Operational Definition of Terms Establishing Trustworthiness
Review of Related Literature Chapter 3. RESULTS Y N
Theoretical Framework Presentation of Data Results
Review of Related Literature Analysis of Data Results
Clinching paragraph presenting the Literature Scoping
Problem Interpretation
The Problem Chapter 4. DISCUSSIONS Y N
Statement of the Problem/ Research Summary
Objectives Conclusions
General Objectives
Recommendations
Specific Objectives
REFERENCE LIST
Conceptual Framework
APPENDICES
Assumptions
Sample Communication letters / study-
Hypothesis site Approval
Scope and Delimitations of the Study Informed Consent Form (WHO)
Significance of the Study Interview Guide (Qualitative)
Chapter 2. METHODOLOGY Y N Sample Questionnaire (Quantitative)
List of study sites, Population, Sample
Sample Letters of Approval
Curriculum Vitae
 Prepared by:
_________________
Name and Signature
Research Adviser
FACULTY RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT / CAPABILITY PROFILE
Digital
Name : JUAN DE LA CRUZ
Address : Marcos High-way, Malingeb, Bantay, Ilocos Sur, 2729 photo
Contact No. : +63 917-123-4567 1X1
Email Address : JuandelaCruz@yahoo.com
Department :

Designation / Position:

PERSONAL DATA
Nationality : Filipino
Sex : Male
Marital Status : Married
Date of Birth : December 25, 2000
Place of Birth : Bantay, Ilocos Sur

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

2008 – 2010 : Master of Arts in Teaching Physical Education

University of Northern Philippines – Graduate Schools

2003 – 2007 : Bachelor of Science in Sports Science

University of the Philippines – Diliman

WORK EXPERIENCE
2019 – Present Instructor I
Permanent
Ilocos Sur Community College

2014 – 2019 Physical Therapist

Permanent
Makati Medical Center

2007 – 2014 Instructor

Contract of Service
University of the Philippines - DIliman

RESEARCH STUDIES (Add more entries as necessary)

Title of Research : Hypertrophy of Popliteal Muscles via Passive ROM
Methodology : Quasi-Experimental Research
Year Completed : 2020
Title of Research : Covid19-Related Stress and Burnout of UP School of Applied Physics
Faculty and Staff.
Method / Research Design : Descriptive-Correlational Research Design
Year Completed : 2019

RESEARCH-RELATED SEMINARS / TRAININGS (Add more entries as necessary)

Title of Seminar / Training : Expediting Clinical Trials during the Covid19 Pandemic
Sponsoring Agency : Saint Lukes Medical Center
Venue : Virtual Seminar (Zoom)
Date : June 12, 2021 – June 13, 2021

Title of Seminar / Training : Use of Technology in Data Collection and Storage

Sponsoring Agency : U.P. School of Advanced Studies
Venue : Rizal Hall, U.P. Diliman Campus
Date : February 18, 2019

JUAN DE LA CRUZ

Research Focal Persons

1. Participate in the planning, implementation, facilitation, and evaluation of research services
and activities in their respective departments.
2. Prepare and submit proposals and consolidated reports on Research activities of their
respective departments.
3. Act as liaison between the ISCC-Research office and the student- and faculty researchers of
their respective departments, and bridges concerns and needs between parties.
4. Prepare and store research-related documents and reports of their respective departments.
5. Prepare minutes of meetings and submit report to the Research Office re: undergraduate thesis
proposal/defense.
6. Perform other functions pertinent to Research services of the College.