Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sdavxcvsgs

    Uploaded by

    Monica Rilveria
    2 views3 pages
    The document compares attitudes towards government surveillance in the 1970s versus today. In the 1970s, Americans were wary of government wiretapping and advised caution with phone calls. However, in 2020 Americans seem less concerned about privacy, more willing to share information, and more likely to ask about the day's weather than whether the government may be listening.

    Original Description:

    dd

    Original Title

    sdavxcvsgs

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares attitudes towards government surveillance in the 1970s versus today. In the 1970s, Americans were wary of government wiretapping and advised caution with phone calls. However, in 2020 Americans seem less concerned about privacy, more willing to share information, and more likely to ask about the day's weather than whether the government may be listening.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views3 pages

    Sdavxcvsgs

    Uploaded by

    Monica Rilveria
    The document compares attitudes towards government surveillance in the 1970s versus today. In the 1970s, Americans were wary of government wiretapping and advised caution with phone calls. However, in 2020 Americans seem less concerned about privacy, more willing to share information, and more likely to ask about the day's weather than whether the government may be listening.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    mericans in the 1970s : "Careful with phone calls the feds could be wiretapping you" Americans in 2020:

    "Wiretap what's the weather like today"

    1.5K

    Reply

    View 40 replies

    MoNPoT

    MoNPoT

    8 months ago

    I like the part when the guy says “Amazon wants a higher % we tried other platforms and we made 10X
    on amazon”😂

    Reply

    View reply

    Smile_uwokeup _2day

    Smile_uwokeup _2day

    8 months ago
    Amazon should not be broken because bezzos made this company big . Amazing

    Reply

    Lynda M

    Lynda M

    2 months ago

    I’m 74 yrs old and absolutely LOVE Amazon for the ease with which I can order almost anything. I am a
    lady that has never enjoyed shopping in crowded malls and stores. I’ve been a member of Amazon
    prime for years now. I can now buy gifts for my grandkids or everyone I want to, choose it , or let them
    voice ‘within a $ amount, order it and then have it shipped. I have way more free time than I ever had
    before Amazon. Keep up your great business. If I’ve ever had a problem, their system allows me to get
    my money back.

    Reply

    Darren Clairmont

    Darren Clairmont

    8 months ago

    My admiration extends to all people approaching global issues through diplomacy and discourse
    through appropriate conduct and channels. That being said that as as a simple self educated individual
    growing up in the 21st. century trying to make sense of global cultures, politics, history in the context of
    why globally there are no gains in geopolitical stability in the course of its history. In recent weeks i have
    had an epiphany as to why not.....i have always ask my self why there has been no progress in the
    nations and the function of governments. it turns out that i had the answer years ago "absolute power
    corrupts absolutely" this grand statement which is not absolute only implies that "INDIVIDUALS" that
    even have only some power whether elected or assigned to guide or manage resources is doomed even
    if the are successful. Historically i can't help site that individuals like Trump, Putin who contribute with
    nihilism other than control/ power and who do not seem to even want to embrace diplomacy will
    always exist and threaten progress of social change for people. Even great leaders that emerge and start
    to make change on behalf of the socio global advances seem to realize that the constructive effort they
    succeeded at is sooner or later dismantled by a successor . Corruption is the real Cause of continuous
    global conflict and as long as individuals continue to control any aspect whether its socio economic,
    medical, technological, law, diplomatic in fact any thing. Is it not methodology you could be addressing
    and not tact....POWER IS A LITERAL ADDICTION AND I THINK IT COULD BE CITED AS AN EXPLANATION AS
    TO WHY EVEN THOSE WITH THE BEST INTENT WILL FAIL AS INDIVIDUALS IN GOVERNANCE.....i think we
    need to shift the paradigm of tribal individual leaders to group and communal leaders for diplomacy to
    make permanent change.

    Reply

    You might also like