Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction to the
Philosophy of the
Human Person
Quarter 2 – Module 2:
Intersubjective Human Relations
Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person – Grade 12
Quarter 2 – Module 2: Intersubjective Human Relations
First Edition, 2020
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work
of the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or
office wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit.
Such agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of
royalties.
Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names,
trademarks, etc.) included in this module are owned by their respective copyright holders.
Every effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these materials from
their respective copyright owners. The publisher and authors do not represent nor claim
ownership over them.
Introduction to the
Philosophy of the
Human Person
Quarter 2 – Module 2:
Intersubjective Human Relations
Introductory Message
For the facilitator:
As a facilitator, you are expected to orient the learners on how to use
this module. You also need to keep track of the learners' progress
while allowing them to manage their own learning at home.
Furthermore, you are expected to encourage and assist the learners as
they do the tasks included in the module.
1
Let Us Learn
This material was designed and written with you in mind. It is here to
help you master the Intersubjective Human Relations. The scope of this
module permits it to be used in many different learning situations. The
language used recognizes the diverse vocabulary level of students. The
lessons are arranged to follow the standard sequence of the course. But the
order in which you read them can be changed to correspond with the
textbook you are now using.
2
Let Us Try
POSSIBILITIES LIMITATIONS
(Write your answers here in any (Write your answers here in any
order) order)
1. __________________________ 9. ___________________________
3
Let Us Study
Before you proceed to the next lesson, you have to recall the previous
lesson which is about FREEDOM. According to Maboloc (2016), freedom is
embedded in one’s being that makes one a dignified person. It helps a
person to be human and humane in dealing with others (p.83).
What is freedom? Is freedom absolute or limited? To answer the
questions, you have to remember Jean Paul Sartre on the concept of
absolute freedom (Being and Nothingness, 1984), and John Kavanaugh
(Philosophy of the Human Person, 2012). On one hand, freedom has no
limitation and a human person destined to be free (Barnes, 1984). On the
other hand, it is not absolute for the fact that human freedom and
structures (may it be buildings or laws) are complementary. They are related
in the sense that freedom becomes functional based on the given structure
(Maboloc, 2016).
Intersubjectivity and Authentic
Dialogue
The Face of the Other
In this part of the module, you can
read the topic about Intersubjectivity, which “The best way to
is based on the Philosophy of the Face by encounter the Other is
Emmanuel Levinas and authentic dialogue not even to notice the
according to the Philosophy of Martin Buber. color of his eyes. The
Specifically, this topic is subdivided into four relation of the face can
(4) subtopics. First part is the introduction. be surely dominated
Second part is all about acceptance of the by perception, but
face of the person as basic requirement of what is specifically the
Intersubjectivity. Third part talks about face is what can’t be
ethical responsibility as a manifestation of a reduce to that. It is
relationship without imposition. Finally, it is exposed, menaced, as
about authentic dialogue or communication if inviting us to an act
that accepts others without prejudice and of violence. At the
discrimination. same time, it is what
forbids us to kill.”
A. Introduction
(Levinas, 1985, p.85)
Human person, in his/her effort to
survive, lives with different facets of
relationship. As a rational and emotional, at
the same time, he/she has to balance
his/her dealings with others, including the mother nature. Balancing one’s
needs and the needs of others demands serious practice yet the reward
becomes the major source life’s meaning. Indeed, it is rewarding when one’s
4
self and others are being treated equally. “It is the source of personal joy,
and comfort which becomes the experience of intersubjectivity. The notion of
intersubjectivity revolves on the act of a person for the good of the other. It
goes beyond space and time, status and position in life” (Maboloc, 2016, p.
103).
As intersubjectivity requires one to accept the other person
unconditionally, the human face reflects the real needs of a person.
According to Emmanuel Levinas, (Totality and Infinity, 1961. p. 85), “the
best way to treat the face of the person is through ethics. The face, as naked
and destitute, should not be dealt phenomenologically or experientially. Due
to the fact that only ethics can value the presentation of a day to day
experience of the other person, while phenomenology or experience
describes the physical appearance of the face.”
Born with Jewish parents, Emmanuel Levinas was born in Lithuania
in 1906. His experience with World War I includes migration of his family.
And his memories of 1917 revolution immerges with his father's bookshop
in Kovno. As a Jew, he acquired the highest spiritual level in Lithuania. He
was considered as the 18th century Talmudist of genius (Hand, 1989, p.1).
B. Acceptance of the Face of the Other Person
5
On the other hand, being indifferent is just like killing a person by not
helping. Seeing the face of the other, “there is a sign of his/her right to exist,
and an ethical call: 'You shall not kill.' Upon seeing a person (pitiful or not)
calls for closeness to his/her human essence, and of the world. It means
going beyond physical relationship and realizes one’s relationship with the
Supreme Being in a person who is unworthy of acceptance” (Hand, 1989,
p.5).
The face of the other person puts one in a superior position. Whereby
the superior person has the capability to dominate. A superior person’s
problem often his/her domineering tendency and to impose what he/she
thinks as limitations and possibilities. In the case of a Person with Disability
(PWD), it becomes so easy to determine his/her limitations and possibilities.
However, it does not help him/her when judgments are imposed to him/her.
According to Levinas, “the face of the other person unfolds the reality
that he/she is different from the rest. The face is supposedly naked because
it is open for endless possibilities (infinite). The possibilities (infinite) of the
face of the person hides in the physical or external appearance. It stops the
superior person from dominant but allows him/her to find transcendence,
and responsibility for the other person” (Hand, 1989, p.5).
Transcendence implies equality in treating oneself and the other self,
which means that neither the latter is inferior nor the former is superior.
Indeed, that is being responsible without imposing on others. Responsibility
(Levinas, 1961, pp.95-96) is the foundation and necessary subjectivity
structure, which is intertwined with ethics. It is understood as an ethical
concern without imposing oneself on others. It is not just as simply as being
able to respond to one’s need. Instead, it sets a fix reminder that proximity
(physical or relational) does not guarantee imposition.
D. Authentic Dialogue with the Other Person
6
both persons are open to the possibilities brought about by human spirit. It
breaks the common, and familiar scenario in communicating with others.
However, authentic dialogue implies extra ordinary communication
and interaction with one another. The other person is perceived to be
different e.g., Persons with Disability (PWD) or even those who belong to the
underprivileged of the society (Arett, 1986, p.19).
The authentic dialogue, as implicated by Martin Buber, begins with
the ‘I”. Yet, it is not enough. The “We” in dialogue must also be activated for
building a community of persons. This “We” unites the “I” and the “Thou”,
the self and the other self, the person and the situation in which each
person is available to the other. The essential “We,” as it unifies the person
with others, points to the essential “Thou” whom being considered as the
underprivileged in the society. The “We” is the members of a community,
who have realized their full responsibility without bias and prejudice (Smith,
1986, pp.158-159).
Authentic dialogue is described as a type of communication that
demands new outlook from a perspective after trusting the other person.
Indeed, trusting someone takes some time especially a person character and
background are unknown and questionable. Yet, Buber explains how the
sacrifices of some people can invite the “We” of community. He believes that
sacrifice is necessary for a healthy community relationship. He denies
sacrifice for the sake of martyrdom. For him, sacrifice answers the call of
depressing situation that demands time and energy. (Smith, 1986, pp.160-
16).
During this Pandemic, there are a lot of heroic acts being reported.
Heroism, indeed, is in the human system which, is very visible in the
Filipino culture. One of these heroes is a “nurse named Lorraine Pingol who
had just passed by in the street of Makati City, able to help a homeless and
pregnant woman, considered by the report as pregnant woman, as a hero”
(GMAnews online, 2020). Here in Davao Region, “front liners are considered
as modern day heroes. They serve as soldiers and as first line of defense”
(SunStar Davao, 2020).
Indeed, as a product of authentic dialogue, demands sacrifice without
the intention of becoming a martyr. It shows the members natural capability
to accept and even help everybody, including strangers, without bias and
prejudice.
7
Let Us Practice
To start with this lesson, you have to read one of the success stories
of a Person with Disability (PWD). Read the article and answer the activity
found on the next page.
8
Write your descriptions here.
Based on 1
the article
above, give
at least ten 2
(10)
descriptions
that 3
characterize
the
personality 4
of Ms. Ana
Kristina
Arce. Please 5
write them
in simple
and 6
complete
sentences.
7
10
9
Let Us Practice More
In your own words, write one simple sentence that would define the
following concepts. And another one simple sentence as example of the said
concepts.
CONCEPT DEFINITION EXAMPLE
A. Intersubjectivity 1. 2.
B. Ethical 3. 4.
responsibility
C. Authentic dialogue 5. 6.
Answer is proper to the Organization is clear. Develops each point Uses technical
question. Content is Starts with a topic with specific details. appropriately and
5 factually correct. Specific sentence. Supporting Answers question correctly. No major
example is clearly points are presented in completely. grammatical or
mentioned a logical progression. spelling errors.
Answer is proper to the Clear sense of order. Develops each point Uses technical
question. Content is Begins with a topic with specific details. appropriately and
4 factually correct. The sentence. Supporting Answers question correctly. No major
example given is not points are presented in completely. grammatical or
specific and not clearly a logical progression. spelling errors.
explained.
Answer is proper to the Lack a thesis sentence, Each point supported Accurate word
question. Content may but points are with evidence. All choice. No more than
3 have one or two factual presented in a logical important points 2 major errors and a
errors. The example is progression. included. few minor errors.
just being mentioned.
10
Let Us Remember
FILL IN THE BLANKS: On the space provided, please supply the missing
word or phrase.
11
Let Us Assess
Multiple Choice. Choose the letter of the best answer. Then, encircle the LETTER of
your answer. Please minimize erasures.
3. Why does the human face of the other become the focus in accepting the
other? It is because of the human face. . .
A. Identifies the human person
B. Represents the human person
C. Reflects the real needs of a person
D. Satisfy the needs of the human person
4. According to Levinas, what is the best way to treat the human face?
A. Through ethics
B. Through intersubjectivity
C. Through authentic dialogue
D. Through acceptance without the imposition
5. Why does the face of the other should not be dealt with phenomenologically?
It is because
A. phenomenology experiences the face
B. phenomenology only describes the physical appearance
C. phenomenology accepts the other person unconditionally
D. phenomenology treats the face of the human person as naked
6. The following are implications when a Person with disability (PWD) is treated
as pitiful or indifferently, EXCEPT:
A. It implies that a person is limited.
B. It implies that a person is being boxed.
C. It implies that a person has a lot of possibilities
D. It implies a judgment that he/she has no bright future at all.
7. What does it mean to have an ethical relationship with the face of the other?
It means that
A. it is ethical not to help him or her.
B. one’s relationship should be based on morality.
C. one’s relationship should go beyond physicality.
D. one’s relationship should be based on one’s status in life.
12
8. What does the superior person capable of?
A. The superior person has the capability to dominate.
B. The superior person has the capability to help the inferior one.
C. The superior person has the capability to control the inferior one.
D. The superior person has the capability to take care of themselves.
13. Which among the two relationships does an authentic dialogue happen?
A. It is through the I-It relationship
B. It is through the I-Thou relationship
C. It is both the I-It and It-Thou relationships
D. it is neither nor the I-It nor the I-Thou relationships
14. The following are the attitudes of persons having authentic dialogue. Which
one does not belong to attitudes?
A. He/she is actively communicating
B. He/she thinks and intends to establish a mutual relationship
C. He/she perceives everybody as different and underprivileged
D. He/she welcomes possibilities brought about by the human spirit.
13
Let Us Enhance
Ronald Anthony “Arar” Ouano, 39, was the netizen who posted a photo of a
PWD delivery food driver in one of the fast-food restaurants in Mandaue.
He chanced upon the driver while he and his family were ordering at the drive-
thru at the same fast-food chain when he noticed that this driver was having a
hard time disembarking from his bike.
Ouano posted the photo yesterday, April 18 because he wanted to share with
the world how this one PWD delivery food driver touched his heart.
“ I immediately called the attention of my wife and we both felt deep respect
and admiration for the man because despite his disability he was still working,
risking his health to feed his family and serving people with food deliveries,”
said Ouano.
The photos he took serve as a great lesson to those who are complaining about
the current situation but has the luxury to just stay home, unlike this delivery
driver who is missing a limb but still works and functions better than those
who have complete body parts.
The post caught the netizen’s attention that as of today, April 19, the post has
already been shared 2,600 times with 2,100 reactions.
To this food delivery driver, you are one heck of a hero and inspiration to
everyone. Stay safe our dear frontliner.
14
Instructions in performing this activity:
1. Read the news feature entitled “Food Delivery Driver Seen Working amid
Covid 19 in Mandaue City.” (You can also read and view some pictures from
this link: https://cebudailynews.inquirer.net/303684/pwd-food-delivery-
driver-seen-working-amid-covid-19.
3. Let somebody take pictures of you while raising your Slogan-poster as a sign
of appreciation to PWD and those who are underprivileged sectors of our
society.
15
Let Us Reflect
The attack was apparently motivated by the fear and paranoia that
frontline workers dealing with COVID-19 patients and those under monitoring
and investigation for possible virus infections are carriers themselves.
The management of the St. Louis Hospital in Tacurong, Sultan Kudarat
is demanding immediate justice and the protection of health workers after one
of its healthcare personnel was viciously attacked by five men on 27 March.
The attack was apparently motivated by the fear and paranoia that
frontline workers dealing with COVID-19 patients and those under monitoring
and investigation for possible virus infections are carriers themselves.
In a public advisory, the hospital said the attack happened on Friday at
around 5 p.m. as the personnel was on his way to report for duty when he
was ganged upon by the men near the President Quirino public market.
“Outnumbered and alone, he was helpless as these vile individuals
splattered Zonrox (bleach) all over his face, which could have caused
irreparable and permanent damage to his sight,” the hospital said.
The victim was, fortunately, able to rush himself to the hospital where
he was given prompt treatment.
“Our personnel is a breadwinner, as many of our frontliners are, who in
the present pandemonium, chose to bravely continue their duties to the
community. They remained unfazed by the discrimination that healthcare
workers now face on a daily basis,” the medical center added.
“We demand justice for our healthcare personnel. He heeded the call of
duty when others would not. As we remain steadfast in the service of the
community, we likewise shall show resilience in this pursuit of justice. We
believe that justice will prevail and we will hold those accountable to the full
extent of the law.”
A Facebook user, one Earl Sunday Perez, shared a photo of the victim
after asking permission from the latter. Perez narrated that doctors at the
emergency unit of the hospital had to undertake irrigation protocol on the
victim’s eyes, along with visual acuity tests. He was administered with anti-
inflammatory and antibiotics eye drops.
16
Case Analysis: In this part, you articulate your ideas about authentic dialogue
without discriminating others by making an ETHICAL DECISION about the case of
a frontliner who was splashed with bleach. Below are some guide questions.
1. Is there a possibility that the health care frontliner mentioned above could
be a virus carrier? Yes or No? Why?
3. Is there a possibility that the attackers were just concerned about the health
of the community members? Yes or No? Why?
5. Applying the lesson on authentic dialogue, how will you reconcile the “safety
of the health care frontliner,” and the “fear of the community for possible
contamination? Please cite a specific situation to substantiate your answer.
17
(Write a Title)
________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
18
19
Let us Let us Let us assess Let us remember
reflect enhance 1. C 1. Intersubjectivity
(possible 2. D 2. Phenomenology
(answers may answers) 3. Experiential
3. C
vary) 4. Face
4. A
1. I am one 5. B 5. Relationship
with you! 6. C 6. Finitude
7. C 7. Commandment
2. You can 8. A 8. possibilities
make it! 9. A 9. External
10. A 10. Dominant
3. Keep safe 11. B 11. Responsibility
always! 12. D 12. I-Thou
13. B 13. I-It
14. D 14. World of Thou
15. D 15. Dialogue
Let us practice more Let us practice Let us try (In any order:
(possible answers) (possible answers) Possibilities 1-8,
1. It means accepting 1. Ana is deaf since birth. Limitations 9-16)
other persons without 2. Ana is eager to learn. 1. Genes
bias. 3. Ana is very intelligent.
2. Parents
2. Best friends who take 4. Ana is a graduate of DLSU-
CSB.
3. Culture
care each other 4. Religion
5. Ana finishes a degree in
3. It is a moral concern 5. Family Tradition
Applied Deaf studies major in
without bias. multimedia arts. 6. Morality
4. Home for the Aged that 6. Ana earns MA in Deaf 7. Laws
houses the poor and Studies from the Gallaudet 8. Rules and
abandoned elderly University, Washington D.C. regulations
without asking any 7. Ana is the first Filipino to
9. Career
amount. be sent to Gallaudet
University with a World Deaf 10. Goals
5. It happens only after 11. Freedom
Leadership Scholarship.
trust and confidence. 12. Reason
8. Ana wants to help the
6. Interreligious dialogue
deaf community. 13. Technology
9. Ana wants to teach the 14. Spirit
deaf persons to be 15. Skills
researchers. 16. Talents
10. Ana aims to unite the
deaf communities.
Answer key to Activities
References
Large, William. Levina’s Totality and Infinity. UK: Bloomsbury Publishing, Plc.
2015.
Levinas, Emmanuel. The Reader. Edited by: Sean Hand. UK: Basil Blackwell, Ltd.
1989.
Levinas, Emmanuel. Ethics and Infinity. Translated by: Richard A. Cohen. USA:
Duquesne University Press. 1985.
Maboloc, Ryan. et.al. Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person: A Senior
High School Course Module. Davao City, Philippines: SMKC PrintShoppe.
2016.
Smith, Ronald Gregor. (trans.). Martin Buber: I and Thou. Edinburgh, UK: Raphael
Buber. 1986.
https://www.kalibrr.com/advice/2015/10/3-inspiring-people-with-disability-pwd-
in-the-philippines. (Accessed August 26, 2020).
https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/metro/751954/nurse-who-was-just-
passing-by-helps-homeless-woman-give-birth-in-makati-city/story/
Accessed August 26, 2020).
https://www.sunstar.com.ph/article/1850541/Davao/Feature/Frontliners-
Modern-day-heroes. (Accessed August 28, 2020).
https://tribune.net.ph/index.php/2020/03/28/covid-frontliners-face-splashed-
with-bleach/. (Accessed August 28, 2020).
20
For inquiries or feedback, please write or call:
Elpidio Quirino Ave., Poblacion District, Davao City, 8000 Davao del Sur
21