Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report 2
Report 2
ON
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF
EARTH AIR HEAT EXCHANGER
SUBMITED BY
MD ABDUL MUKTADAR ALI (2451-18-736-076)
PERISETTI NAGA AMARSAI (2451-18-736-083)
METTU ROHITH REDDY (2451-18-736-084)
JANGAM VEERA SAI VAMSHEE (2451-18-736-086)
B.E. 4TH YEAR, MECHANICAL-2
PROJECT GUIED:
MR. V. SUMANRAJU
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
SUBMITTED TO
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
MVSR COLLEGE OF ENGINEEERING, HYDERABAD
1
CONTENTS
2 Introduction 4
4 Methodology 8
8 References 15
2
ABSTRACT
3
INTRODUCTION
4
LITERATURE SURVEY
A simplified analytical model to study year around effectiveness of an
EAHE coupled greenhouse located in New Delhi, India. They found
the temperature of greenhouse air on average 6- 7 °C more in winter
and 3-4 °C less in summer than the same greenhouse when operating
without EAHE. A developed thermal model for heating of greenhouse
by using different combinations of inner thermal curtain, an earth air
heat exchanger, and geothermal heating. the performance analysis of
EAHE for summer cooling in Jaipur, India. They discussed 23.42 m
long EAHE at cooling mode in the range of 8.0-12.7 °C and 2-5 m/s
flow rate for steel and PVC pipes. They showed performance of
system is not significantly affected by the material of buried pipe
instead it is greatly affected by the velocity of air fluid. They observed
COP variation 1.9- 2.9 for increasing the velocity 2-5 m/s.
Kabashnikov et al. [36] presented an effective mathematical model for
calculating the temperature of the ground and air in a ground heat
exchanger for ventilation systems. The model was based on the
representation of temperature in the form of the Fourier integral.
Parametric study was performed to analyse performance behaviour of
EAHE by taking into account the air flow rate, variation in length,
diameter of tubes, depth of burial, and spacing between tubes. The
results of calculations agreed with the experimental data. The
developed model was simple and easy to calculate and can be referred
for design considerations.
O.P Jakhar and Rajendra Kukana (2014) investigate the transient
thermal analysis of earth air tunnel heat exchanger using CFD and
experimental setup for Summer Season. The analysis of majorly
available soil in the Bikaner region, have been considered are Sandy
5
Loam Soil and Sandy Soil. The cooling effect of 13.85 and 9.22°C is
obtained for the Sandy Loam Soil at inlet air velocity 9 m/sec for the
temperature 47.6 and 39.3°C, respectively, as difference of the inlet
temperature (higher) and the outlet temperature (lower). For the
Sandy soil this difference of the inlet to outlet temperature of EATHE
is 17.85 and 10.42°C for the temperature 47.6 and 39. 3°C.The
cooling effect is more for the Sandy soil as compared to the sandy
Loam Soil. Hence Cooling is affected by the properties of soil
considered.
Thakur, A. Sharma et.al [2015] has expressed that the finned mild
steel pipe of 1.2m and diameter 0.0889m inside the earth
produced a temperature fall till 3°C for various daily
temperatures. For higher inlet temperature and the outlet
temperature difference recorded is mostly from 2- 3°C. The COP
of the heat exchanger ranges from 0.928 – 2.785 for temperature
difference of 1°C - 3°C respectively. Higher COP can be obtained
when temperature difference is greater and this can be achieved
by using longer pipe for more heat transfer. With a pipe of 1.2m
the decrease in temperature is recorded mostly by 1-3°C. For a
longer pipe length at this depth 5 ft the temperature of air will
decrease significantly since the air will have longer time to flow
through the pipe where convective heat transfer will occur for
longer time in the tunnel which will produce greater temperature
difference and larger COP.
6
Ghosal et al. [25] developed a complete numerical model to predict
and compare thermal performance of two buried pipe systems, that is,
ground air collector and EAHE, integrated with the greenhouse
located in the premises of Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India,
for choosing a suitable heating method in the composite climate of
India. It was concluded that the temperatures of greenhouse air with
ground air collector were observed to be 2-3°C higher than those with
EAHE and the temperature fluctuations of greenhouse air were also
less when operated with ground air collector as compared to EAHE.
A fair agreement was observed between predicted and computed
values of greenhouse air temperatures in both systems. Finally ground
air collector was chosen as a suitable option for heating of greenhouse
in the composite climate of India.
Rohit Misra, Vikas Bansal, Ghanshyam Das Agrawal et al. [2013] has
expressed that with increase in length of pipe, the outlet air
temperature from EAHE decreases. The decrease in air temperature
was sharp for the first 10 meters length of pipe and it became
moderate afterwards. So, increasing the length of pipe more than 20‐
30m did not cause any significant rise in performance and
improvements began to stabilize, indicated these values could be
optimal design values for hot and dry climatic conditions of Bhopal. It
was observed that with increase in pipe diameter, the outlet air
temperature of EAHE increases because the convective heat transfer
coefficient at inner surface of pipe as well as overall heat transfer
coefficient at earth‐ pipe interface decreases at higher pipe diameters.
With increase in depth of pipe burial, outlet air temperature of EAHE
7
system decreases. So, pipes of EAHE system should be installed as
deeply as possible but it increases excavation cost. So, it is advised to
keep depth of pipe burial about 2m in order to limit the
initial/installation cost of EAHE system.
METHODOLOGY
The experimental setup is considered as an open loop flow
system to conduct theoretical investigation on the temperature
difference for inlet and Outlet section, heat transfer for a
velocity of 2m/s of air in pipe in parallel connection. The
experimental data are to be used to find the increase of
cooling rate for the summer condition. The experimental setup
8
consists of a aluminium tube of length 4m and diameter of
0.08m buried at a depth of 1m in box filled with sand. The
outlet temperature of the tube is calculated for the given
inputs using NTU (number of transfer units) method.
FABRICATION
The wooden box of length=1m, breadth=1m, and
depth=1m is taken.
The aluminium tube of length 4m and diameter 0.08m is
placed in it and it is filled completely with sand.
The inlet of the tube is attached to a blower of 33w
power so that the air flows across the tube.
The outlet of the tube is attached to a small room space
where the temperature drop is measured.
The temperature inside the tube and the temperature of
the sand are measured using a probe thermometer.
The velocity of the air at inlet and outlet is measured
using anemometer.
COST ESTIMATE
MATERIAL COST
ALUMINUM 4000/-
THERMOMETER 400/-
9
ADDITIONAL COST 1000/-
DESIGN CALCULATIONS
ASSUMPTIONS:
The surface temperature of is equal to the ambient air
temperature, which equals the inlet air temperature.
Earth undisturbed temperature approximated equal to
annual average temperature of the location.
The thickness of the tube is very small so thermal
resistance is negligible
The temperature of the pipe is uniform in axial direction
which equals to the ETU.
List of formulas we consider while calculating the length of
earth tube heat exchanger, and temperature difference of inlet
and outlet for different velocities of air for same length of
pipe.
Mass flow rate (m)
10
Prandtl number (Pr)
If 2300 ≤ R e < 106
Convective heat transfer coefficient (h)
Effectiveness (ε)
11
NTU
8. NTU = 0.6631
13
9. Length = 4m
REFERENCES
[1] Bisoniya TS, Kumar A, Baredar P (2013) Experimental
and analytical studies of earth–air heat exchanger (EAHE)
systems in India: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 19:238–
246
[2] DheerajSardana et al, Effects of parameters on
performance of earth air heat exchanger system (EAHE): a
review, [IJATES], [ISSN 2348-7550, Vol. 3special issue no. 02,
February 2015]
[3] Kumar, R., S. Rajesh, and S.C. Kaushik, Performance
evaluation and energy conservation potential of earth-air-tunnel
system coupled with non-air-conditioned building. Building and
Environment, 2003.
[4] N.K. Bansal et al, Evaluation of an earth–air tunnel system
for cooling/heating of a hospital complex, Building and
Environment [IJATES][VOL NO 06 MAR 2013]
[5] P.K. Nag, Heat & Mass Transfer, McGraw Hill Education
Private Limited [ Edition 2014]
[6] Heat and mass transfer data book, New Age International
publishers [ninth edition 2018]
15
[7] O.P Jakhar and Rajendra Kukana CFD Thermal Analysis
of Earth Air Heat Exchanger for Hot & Dry Climate [august
19,2019] ISBN-10 : 6139951828
[8] Vikas Bansal, Rohit Misra, Ghanshyam Das Agarwal
Transient effect of soil thermal conductivity and duration of
operation on performance of Earth Air Tunnel Heat Exchanger
2013, vol. 103
[9] Arpit Thakur, Aashish Sharma CFD Analysis of Earth-Air
Heat Exchanger to Evaluate the Effect of Parameters on Its
Performance Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) (2015)
[10] Ghosal, M K; Tiwari, G N; Srivastava, N S L, Thermal
modelling of a greenhouse with an integrated earth to air heat
exchanger: an experimental validation (2004)
16