SHREE VAISHNAV

ACADEMY

Session : 2022-23
Subject : English Project
Topic : SHOULD ANIMAL TESTING
BE BANNED?
Submitted to : Mrs. Kirti Anurag
Malviya
Submitted by : Tanishq Durgesh
Bhawsar
 Certificate
This is to certify that .... TANISHQ
BHAWSAR.... student of XII science has
successfully prepared the report on project
entitled
“Should Animal Testing be Banned”
under the guidance of
Mrs. Kirti Anurag Malviya
This report is the result of her endeavour
and efforts
The report is found worthy of acceptance as
the final project for subject English of
class XII.
Signature of English teacher Signatureof External Examiner

Signature of Principal
 Declaration
I hereby declare that the project work
entitled

“SHOULD ANIMAL TESTING BE

BANNED?”

Submitted to Department of English,

SHREE VAISHNAV ACADEMY
is prepared by me.

.....Tanishq Durgesh Bhawsar.....

 Acknowledgement
I would like to express deep thanks of
gratitude to my project guide
Mrs.Kirti Anurag Malviya for guiding me
immensely through the project. Her constant
guidance and advices are responsible for the
successful completion of this project.
I would like to thanks our Principal, Mrs.
RichaTiwari Diwan for coordinating in every
possible way for the project
I must appreciate my classmates as well as my
dear family for being there with me
throughout the ups and downs of the project .
Last but not the least I would like to thank all
those who helped me directly or indirectly for
the completions of the project.
 .....Tanishq Durgesh Bhawsar.....

Should Animal Testing be

Banned ?
Favour:Yes Animal Testing Should be
Banned

INTRODUCTION

For centuries, animals have been known as man’s

companions, a form of therapeutic relief, and a source

for human joy and entertainment. However, animals

are being tortured and treated cruelly for the sake of

human prosperity all over the country. Animal testing

as a means of researching medical advancements and

product quality for consumers is a large problem in

today’s society. The research experiments executed

with animals in the name of scientific discovery call

into question the compassion and integrity of the

human spirit. If we do not put an end to animal

testing in the United States, many animals will suffer

in anguish through the torment inflicted upon them in

a product testing lab. Product testing on animals

should be illegal, because animals are killed or kept in

captivity their entire life, substances that are tested on

animals may never be released for human use, and

there are alternatives available to testing on animals.

Product testing on animals should be illegal due to the

fact that animals are killed or kept in captivity their

entire lives. Just imagine another feeling, breathing,

living being sitting in a cold, wet cage, waiting to have

a cruel test administered to them. After the

excruciating experiment which tests their tolerance

towards pain and endurance to keep living, the

researcher ends abruptly ends their life. That is what

animals all across the world experience waiting in a

science lab to be tested on. This is the life of an animal

in a clinical testing trial. The testing lab environments

animals are kept in are horrendous. Animals that are

kept for research purposes usually live in confined,

cramped spaces their entire lives inhibiting healthy

growth for any living being.

 If animal testing

continues to be a legal source of research for products

and medications, many animals will continue to die

cruel and unusual deaths with little benefit to

humanity. Animal testing should be ruled illegal.

These animals are forced to live in science labs under

inhumane circumstances for the testing of products

which rarely ending up being used for humans and

could have been measured for safety by using

alternative methods to animal testing. Animals are

important to humans for companionship,

rehabilitation, and quite necessarily depended on for

sustenance.
  HISTORY OF ANIMAL TESTIMG
Vivisection or what is described as animal testing

is an old practice. It could be dated back at a time

of the primitive man, who could feed new food to

some wild dogs to determine if it would be edible.

Importantly, some princes utilized human guinea

pigs to test whether their food was suitable for

consumption (Rowan 194).

The act of animal testing is dated back to Greeks.

1n 450 BCE a Greek philosopher Alcmaeon did a

vivisection and interfered with the dog’s optic

nerve, which was essential for physicians to

evaluate the cause of blindness in human.

(Watson 11). In the third and fourth centuries

BCE, Aristotle (384-322 BCE) and Erasistratus (304-

258 BCE) utilized animals for their experiments

(Watson 11).

In the second century Rome, Claudius Galen, a

physician experimenter performed dissections on

goats as well as pigs to get knowledge of muscles

and nerves and thus is renowned as the father of

Vivisection (Watson 11). Moreover, in the twelfth

century, another Arabic physician, Avenzoar

dissected animals and established animal testing

experiment in testing surgical processes prior to

their application to man.

 HARASING ANIMALS DURING TEST

Animal Experimentation has been a problem and it

still remains being one of the biggest problems. Most
people agree that animal experimentation should be
banned but there is no agreement of what the outcome
would be. Although, there are other ways of getting
results without testing on animals which
are,  human  tissue, drug trials, genetic testing, etc.
Other people think  animal testing  is the best way
because some animals have an organism as a human
like traits such as mice, rats, cats, monkeys, pigs etc.
Sometimes testing on an animal does not completely
match with a human body reaction towards the
outcome of the research from an animal.

 CONCLUSION
Although humans often benefit from successful

animal research, the pain, the suffering, and the

deaths of animals are not worth the possible

human benefits. Therefore, animals should not be

used in research or to test the safety of

products.First, animals' rights are violated when

they are used in research. Although humans often

benefit from successful animal research, the pain,

the suffering, and the deaths of animals are not

worth the possible human benefits. Therefore,

animals should not be used in research or to test

the safety of products.  Researchers can test the

potential damage that a product can do to the skin

by using this artificial "skin" instead of testing on

animals. 
  BIBLIOGRAPHY
• www.google.com
• www.documents.mx
• www.wikipedia.org •
www.docfoc.com
• www.slideshare.net