Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ubaldo
Assessment No. 3
Instruction: Discuss the following items thoroughly. Write the questions before each answer. Each
answer should contain at least three (3) paragraphs of not less than four (4) sentences each. You may
write your answers in Filipino. Do not forget to write your full name in the upper left corner of the paper
and your course, year, and section below it while the name of your professors should be indicated in the
upper right.
1. Create a Table of Antonio De Morga and Jose Rizal’s Perspectives on Filipino culture, compare
the two based on internal and external perspectives.
2. At the end of the table, give an overall analysis of the differences between the two in Filipino
culture.
The Philippines' diverse cultures and traditions contribute to its unique identity. As can be seen, the
country has a variety of customs that stem from the influences of various colonizers who visited the country.
Antonio De Morga is said to have written the first lay formal history of Spain's conquest of the Philippines
because of all of the unique features. Nonetheless, it appears that Jose Rizal annotated Morga's published
work because of the unusual contents written about Philippine history, as he wanted to introduce the
Filipinos to their own authentic culture and history prior to the Spaniards' colonization.
Given the table's ideas and observations, Jose Rizal amended and clarified the majority of Morga's
statements, which were mostly based on Spanish principles. In contrast to what the Spaniards claimed,
Rizal believed that the Philippines had a prosperous and traditional way of life enhanced by culture,
tradition, and unity. Rizal demonstrated that had Spain and the friars did not annihilate the pre-Hispanic
Philippine development, it could have grown and developed into something noteworthy. Furthermore, Rizal
believes that Morga was more sympathetic to the Indios, and that he was not only an observer but also a
participant in the situations he described. Rizal believed that the analysis of Morga should be transcribed
from the colonized, not the colonizer. At the time, there was no collection of Filipino experiences written
by an Indio. The Philippines have been undervalued, and what was previously available was a history of
Spain in the Philippines, rather than a background of the Philippines. Indios were given less significance or
worth during those times and were thought to lack the ability to create such intellectual works.
"The same thing can't be said today," Rizal added about Morga's work. On paper and in words, the
administration tries to educate the Filipinos, but in reality, and at the bottom, it encourages obliviousness
by entrusting education to the friars, who are accused by Spaniards, Filipinos, and foreigners of wanting
the country's inhumane treatment, and who themselves attest to it through their behavior and literary
works." Jose Rizal's annotation could be classified as socio-political in that it focused on education and the
administration system in the Philippines at the time. I could clearly sense the message Rizal wanted to
convey through his annotation. In my opinion, this annotation accurately expresses his exact feelings about
the harsh treatment of the friars he personally experienced, as well as his family members, relatives,
companions, and all Filipinos during the Spanish regime.