Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-018-0267-5 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV)
RESEARCH PAPER
Abstract
In this paper, a micromechanical approach is employed to propose a cerebral cortex tissue representative volume element
(RVE) and simulate the mechanical behavior of this type of tissue in different loadings. In this regard, a MATLAB code is
developed to homogenize a random distribution of neurons in the extracellular matrix. To create the RVE, different inputs
including the size of RVE, the number of neurons, the radius of the neuron cell body, the coordinates of the axon and
dendrites of a neuron, the radius of the axon and dendrites, and the minimum distance between the cellular volumes are
considered. Then, a PYTHON code is developed which generates the desired RVE in ABAQUS employing the outputs of
the MATLAB code. Also, a viscoelastic material model is considered for material components of the cerebral cortex tissue
in this study. To analyze the developed RVE, some relaxation tests are performed on the RVE. Strain rate, neuron volume
fraction (NVF), loading time and neuron distribution are investigated in different stress relaxation tests on the developed
RVEs. Considering the NVF of 1, 2 and 3%, it is concluded that the maximum tensile and compressive stresses rise by
increasing the NVF. Also, the results demonstrate that different irregular distributions of neurons have no effect on the bulk
mechanical properties of the tissue for a constant NVF and only affect the distribution of local stresses (and even the
maximum stress) in the tissue. Finally, the numerical simulations revealed that the developed RVE is a robust element
which can be employed in realistic model of the brain tissue in different loading conditions such as trauma.
Keywords Micromechanical modeling Cerebral cortex tissue Neuron Extracellular matrix Representative volume
element (RVE)
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
the development of a realistic numerical model of the brain Employing the FE simulation of unconfined compression
is the understanding of the properties of this material’s tests and experimental data, they evaluated their model.
constituents. Thus, knowing the micromechanical behavior Macromechanical analysis of the brain tissue provides
of the tissue in different loading conditions leads to better knowledge of mechanical response of the brain against
understanding of TBI physics. Numerous biomechanical external forces. Since macromechanical models cannot
studies have been performed to identify and evaluate the predict the distribution of stress and strain between the
mechanical properties of the brain tissue. Since this tissue structural components of the brain tissue, they do not have
has unique complexities in microscale, such as geometrical any understanding of the mechanisms of DAI. On the other
complexity, many researches have been conducted in a hand, micromechanical models can identify the influence
macroscale. Accordingly, the brain tissue samples have of each material constituent on the response of tissue. Thus,
been tested in the different experiments such as tensile, these models have a good capability to demonstrate the
compressive, shear and high-frequency loadings (in vitro) mechanism of DAI. Micromechanical finite element
(Van Dommelen et al. 2010; Velardi et al. 2006; Prevost methods present a robust tool to express the relationship
et al. 2011; Budday et al. 2017; Ramo et al. 2018). In this between the biological and mechanical behaviors (Abol-
paper, a 3D micromechanical model of the cerebral cortex fathi et al. 2009).
tissue with random distribution of nerve cells in ECM is Arbogast and Margulies (1999) presented a fiber-rein-
proposed. This is an introduction to simulate the dynamic forced composite model which includes cylindrical axons
loading applied on brain tissue like trauma. Therefore, in surrounded by an extracellular matrix (ECM). Their aim
the future, employing the proposed RVE in this paper, was to study the mechanical behavior of the brain stem
some impact loadings (with various properties) on the brain under the rotational force. Also, they used the Hashin
will be modeled in order to recognize the first place where micromechanical model (1966) to assess the brain stem
brain injury occurs. linear viscoelastic behavior and presented an analytical
Recently, hyperelastic constitutive models have been solution for determining the linear viscoelastic properties
employed to model the nonlinear mechanical behavior of of axon and ECM. Considering the viscoelastic transverse
the brain tissue in large deformations. Rashid et al. (2012) isotropic behavior of brain stem, Ning et al. (2006) pro-
conducted high-strain-rate tensile tests on brain tissue posed a unidirectional fibrous composite model for this
samples to examine the effect of the strain rate on its vis- material. They represented the instantaneous nonlinear
cous behavior. They presented a two-term Ogden consti- elastic response of the brain stem as a hyperelastic trans-
tutive model for the nonlinear hyperelastic behavior of the verse isotropic behavior of a tissue. Also, they used a linear
brain tissue and calibrated their model parameters using the isotropic viscoelastic model for both axons and matrix to
reverse finite element method and fitting the experimental investigate the rate dependency of the brain tissue. Con-
data. Feng et al. (2013) utilized dynamic shear tests on the sidering the effects of morphologic heterogeneities, Cloots
white matter of the brain to specify the required material et al. (2008) studied the mechanical behavior of cerebral
parameters in a hyperelastic model which represents the cortex. They developed various detailed 2D FE models and
anisotropic behavior of that matter. Laksari et al. (2012) finally made a homogeneous cortex FE model. Also, they
used compressive stress relaxation tests to develop a con- utilized the loading conditions presented by Brands et al.
stitutive model for finite compression. They considered a (1999). Abolfathi et al. (2009) presented a micromechani-
modified Mooney–Rivlin model for volume preserving and cal process to study the anisotropic properties of brain stem
a two-term Ogden model for volume changing part of containing viscoelastic axons surrounded by ECM. They
deformation and calibrated the material parameters by fit- studied a process to determine the anisotropic behavior of
ting the numerical results and experimental instantaneous the brain white matter. Also, employing the experimental
and equilibrium data. Also, many biomechanical resear- data of Arbogast and Margulies (1999), they obtained the
ches have been performed to investigate the association viscoelastic properties of axons and ECM. Karami et al.
between the TBI and intensity of the stress or strain (Bain (2009) proposed a micromechanical finite element model
and Meaney 2000; Bain et al. 2003; Pfister et al. 2006). In to investigate the homogenized behavior of the brain tissue
these researches, the injury limit has been specified for in large deformation. In this model, the brain tissue was
separated and intertwined axons in different loading con- assumed as a fibrous composite containing axons and
ditions. In this regard, Valdez and Balachandran (2013) anisotropic hyperelastic matrix. Utilizing adaptive kine-
proposed a nonlinear visco-hyperelastic model to examine matic and Ogden hyperelastic constitutive model, Pan et al.
the effect of material nonlinearity on the stress wave (2011) micromechanically developed an RVE to study the
propagation in the brain. In the following, Chatelin et al. mechanical responses of axons in tissue under large tensile
(2013) developed an isotropic transversely visco-hypere- deformations.
lastic constitutive model for human brain tissue.
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
Based on what has been mentioned, many brain tissue irregularly distributed in the cerebral cortex and the tissue
models have been proposed by researchers. In order to has an isotropic property (Cloots et al. 2011, 2013). In the
overcome the high cost of the experimental tests in the proposed model, cerebral cortex tissue has been considered
microscale, the micromechanical modeling is a good as a two-phase composite which includes neuron cells as
choice as an alternative of laboratory tests. One of the most the fillers and ECM as a basic matrix. Also, it has been
important limitations of the micromechanical analysis on assumed that the fillers have been randomly distributed in
the brain tissue is the lack of material behavior of its the basic matrix. Although this type of distribution has
constituents. Also, complex geometry is another important complexity in analytical and geometrical modeling, more
limitation of this tissue that makes the micromechanical exact results are obtained, especially in distribution of
modeling difficult. The time-consuming modeling and stress and strain in tissue (Abolfathi et al. 2009).
locking of microstructure in high NVF is one of the dis-
advantages of this method. The main advantage of this 2.1 Representative Volume Element and Finite
method is generalizability to examine the pattern of dam- Element Modeling
age, the study of brain tissue multiphysics, examination of
the TBI under various conditions and trauma examination. A three-dimensional representative volume element for
In this paper, the cerebral cortex tissue is microme- cerebral cortex tissue includes the neurons that are ran-
chanically investigated by presenting a realistic RVE. In domly distributed in the ECM. Although none of the neu-
this regard, a three-dimensional geometrical model is rons have the same geometry, all of them have the same
introduced with a more realistic model in comparison with general structure which contains three parts (as shown in
the previous developed models. This model is suitable for Fig. 1a): cell body, dendrites and axon. Considering these
the nonhomogeneous part of brain that has an isotropic parts, we developed a reference neuron cell model in
behavior. The proposed RVE includes randomly dis- ABAQUS software which is depicted in Fig. 1b. In this
tributed neuron cells in a matrix in which both are vis- model, Solid3 and Beam4 elements are, respectively, used
coelastic. Assuming the perfect link between the for cell body, axons and dendrites (Documentation 2010).
components, a homogenized finite element model is Since the ratio of axon and dendrites length to its diameter
developed for the cerebral cortex tissue using ABAQUS
6.14. In this regard, we present the micromechanical
modeling, material constitutive modeling, creating RVE
and homogenizing of the material in this paper.
2 Micromechanical Modeling
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
is more than ten (Braitenberg and Schüz 2013), they are file as output. To create the model in ABAQUS software, a
modeled by the beam element type attached to the ECM PYTHON code is developed which generates the desired
with a perfect coupling. This element type selection results representative volume elements in ABAQUS employing the
in reducing the number of elements in RVE, and conse- outputs of the MATLAB code.
quently, computational costs are decreased. Also, cell body
is modeled as a sphere which is connected to the axon and 2.2 Homogenization
dendrites with a perfect coupling. Finally, the cell body is
attached to the axon and dendrites through the wire The brain responses in bulk scale may vary in different
elements. conditions such as loading condition, temperature, strain
Creating a three-dimensional RVE (Fig. 2), the random rate as well as other physical parameters. To simulate these
distribution of neurons in the ECM is performed by a responses, different material constitutive models have been
mathematical code written in MATLAB. This code has proposed including elastic, viscoelastic, hyperelastic and
different inputs including the size of the cube side, the poroelastic models (Ferrant 2000; Meaney 2003; Miller
number of neurons, the radius of the cellular volume, the and Chinzei 1997; Škrinjar 2001; Wang and Wineman
coordinates of axon and dendrites of a neuron, the radius of 1972).
the axons and dendrites and the minimum distance between Based on the micromechanical principles, properties of
the cellular volumes. First, a cell body is assumed in the a composite material can be estimated from its components
center of the cube, which is considered as the center properties and distribution. In this regard, a viscoelastic
coordinates. Then, some points, as the number of the material model is considered for material components of
neurons, are randomly chosen in the cube based on speci- the cerebral cortex tissue in this study. Firstly, both
fied constraints including cell–cell and cell–cube collisions. microcomponents are considered as an elastic, homoge-
By having these points, transformation matrices are derived neous and isotropic material.
and rotation matrices are randomly assumed as the number In the elastic analysis, the material behavior is based on
of them and both are applied on the axon and dendrites. the Hooke’s law which is presented as follows:
Afterward, collisions that may have occurred during the eij ¼ S ijkl rkl ð1Þ
distribution are identified and new rotation matrices are
created and applied on collided axon and dendrites. This where rkl , eij and S ijkl are stress, strain and compliance
loop continues until no collision between two neurons is tensors, respectively. Equation (1) can be represented in
observed and an acceptable representative volume element the Voigt form in the following form (Boresi et al. 1993):
would be created. Finally, reference neuron coordinate and 2 3 2 32 3
e1 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 r1
the transformation and rotation matrices are stored in a text 6 e2 7 6 S21 S22 S23 S24 S25 S26 76 r2 7
6 7 6 76 7
6 e3 7 6 S31 S32 S33 S34 S35 S36 76 r3 7
6 7¼6 76 7 ð2Þ
6 e4 7 6 S41 S42 S43 S44 S45 S46 76 r4 7:
6 7 6 76 7
4 e5 5 4 S51 S52 S53 S54 S55 S56 54 r5 5
e6 S61 S62 S63 S64 S65 S66 r6
According to the microstructural symmetry of the tissue,
the number of compliance tensor coefficients is between 2
and 21. For instance, the number of unknown independent
coefficients of an orthotropic material is reduced to 9
(Garnich and Karami 2004).
To evaluate the viscoelastic behavior of the tissue, a
method is also used the same as elastic. In the viscoelastic
materials, the relationship between stress and strain is
expressed using an integral method presented in the fol-
lowing form:
Z t s
ts dekl
r0ij ðtÞ ¼ Cijkl
t
e0kl þ Cijkl ds; i; j; k; l ¼ 1; 2; 3 ð3Þ
0 dt
where Cijkl is the stiffness matrix and t denotes the time.
According to the above relation, the stress in the tissue at
any time depends on material behavior in history. To cal-
Fig. 2 Representative volume element (RVE) created in ABAQUS culate the stiffness coefficients, mechanical properties are
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
considered as constants in each incremental time of simu- (directional and rotational) of a face of RVE are fixed and a
lation. Thus, we can discretize the integral in Eq. (3). In shear displacement is applied on its parallel face.
this study, the relaxation test is employed to analyze where In this study, the RVE is considered as orthotropic
the strain is constant and stress relaxes over the time. It is material in which compliance tensor has nine unknown
noteworthy to mention that Eq. (3) can be represented in coefficients. Nine independent equations are needed in
the Voigt form as: order to determine these coefficients. In this regard, six
2 3 2 t t t t t t 32 0 3 kinematic loadings on RVE, including three compressive
r11 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 e11
6 r 7 6 Ct t
C22 t
C23 t
C24 t
C25 t 76 0 7
C26 and three shear loadings, can lead to obtaining these
6 22 7 6 21 76 e22 7
6 7 6 t t t t t t 7 6 7 equations. To solve these equations, applied stress and
6 r33 7 6 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36 76 e033 7
6 7 6 76 7
6 r 7 ¼ 6 Ct t
C42 t
C43 t
C44 t
C45 t 76 0 7
C46 76 e23 7
strain on the RVE should be calculated after loading. Thus,
6 23 7 6 41
6 7 6 t t 7 6 7 a PYTHON code is developed in ABAQUS software to
4 r31 5 4 C51 t
C52 t
C53 t
C54 t
C55 C56 54 e031 5
t t t t t t determine mean volumetric stress and strain values which
r12 C61 C62 C63 C64 C65 C66 e012
2 ts ts 32
3 are presented in the following forms:
C11 C12 ts ts
C13 ts
C14 ts
C15 C16 des11 dt Z
6 C ts C ts ts ts ts ts 76 s
7 1
6 21 22 C23 C24 C25 C26 76 de22 dt 7 hri ¼ rm dv ð5Þ
Z t 6 ts ts 7 6 7 V V
6 C31 C32 ts ts
C33 ts
C34 ts
C35 C36 76 des33 dt 7
þ 6 76 7ds Z
6 ts C ts ts ts ts ts 76 s 7
0 6 C41 42 C43 C44 C45 C46 76 de23 dt 7 1
6 ts ts 7 6 s 7 hei ¼ em dv ð6Þ
4 C51 C52 ts ts
C53 ts
C54 ts
C55 C56 5 4 de31 dt 5 V V
ts
C61 ts
C62 ts
C63 ts
C64 ts
C65 C66ts
des12 dt
where V is the RVE total volume. hri and hei are,
ð4Þ
respectively, mean volumetric (macroscopic) stress and
Shear and compressive experiments are needed in order strain. Also, rm and em are local (microscopic) stress and
to study the viscoelastic behavior and characterization of strain, respectively. Since the reported stress and strain by
the desired tissue. In these tests, a constant strain, which the ABAQUS software are in the local coordinate, we
should not exceed 5% to correctly assume infinitesimal should calculate these variables in global coordinate in
strain, is applied on the RVE (Abolfathi et al. 2009). In the order to use Eqs. (5) and (6). Thus, Eq. (7) is utilized to
compressive tests, a compressive displacement is applied rotate the stress tensor into global coordinate.
on a side of RVE and its opposite side is fixed in all
½r ¼ ½T ½r0 ½Tt ð7Þ
directions and rotations. In addition, two nonparallel sides
from the remaining four sides are fixed in perpendicular r and r0 are, respectively, stress tensors in global and local
direction (see Fig. 3). These boundary conditions have coordinates and also T t is the transposition of rotation
been introduced by Shaoning (2014) that lead to appro- tensor that is presented in Eq. (8) in the following form:
priate results. In shear tests, all freedom degrees 2 3
cos /1 cos U sin /1 cos /1 sin U
½T ¼ 4 sin /1 cos U cos /1 sin /1 sin U 5 ð8Þ
sin U 0 cos U
where U and /1 are depicted in Fig. 4 as follows (Mazrouei
et al. 2014):
Fig. 3 Implemented boundary conditions on RVE Fig. 4 Relation between local and global coordinates
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
X 2085.258 – –
Table 1 Elastic properties of the cerebral cortex tissue constituents
(Abolfathi et al. 2009) Y 2083.528 – –
Z 2084.753 – –
Elastic modulus (Pa) Poisson ratio
XY – 698.612 0.492
Neuron 6160 0.4999 XZ – 697.736 0.495
ECM 2040 0.4999 YZ – 697.123 0.496
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
numerous experiments and mechanical properties of the ratio of diameter to length (aspect ratio) of neuron cells,
tissue can be obtained using two types of tests. there is no significant change in elastic modulus in different
Following the selection of an appropriate RVE, the volume fractions. It is noteworthy to mention that the
effect of NVF on the mechanical behavior of the cerebral volume ratio of axon and dendrites to volume cell is very
cortex tissue is investigated. As shown in Fig. 6, the vol- low. Abolfathi et al. (2009) reported that in areas of the
ume fraction is varied between 1% and 4%. Neuron cells brain such as the stem, where only axons are surrounded by
are depicted in different colors to better see the distribu- the ECM, increasing the volume fraction of axons leads to
tion. As observed in Fig. 7, the elastic modulus is raised by enhancement of the elastic modulus.
increasing the volume fraction of neurons. Due to the low
Fig. 6 RVE with dimension of 900 lm with the NVF of a 1%, b 2%, c 3% and d 4%
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
Table 4 Young modulus for two RVEs with NVF of 2% and different
random distribution
Mechanical properties (Pa) First distribution Second distribution
Ex 2070.499 2069.533
Ey 2067.772 2068.249
Ez 2068.683 2067.231
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
Fig. 9 von Mises stress contour of neuron after compressive load on RVE
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
25
25
20
20
15 15
S22 (Pa)
VF1 VF1
S11 (Pa)
VF2 VF2
10 10
VF3 VF3
5 5
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time (s) Time (s)
(a) (b)
Fig. 12 a rxx and b ryy of RVE with the NVF of 1, 2 and 3% under loading in x and y directions
200 1200
180
160 1000
140
800
S11,max (Pa)
120
Smises (Pa)
1000
800
S11,max (Pa)
600 VF1
VF2
400
VF3
200
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time (s)
(c)
Fig. 13 a von Mises stress and maximum, b tensile rxx and c compressive rxx of tissue with neuron volume fractions of 1, 2 and 3% under
loading in the x direction
NVF. Also, the maximum tensile and compressive stresses mean stress tends to a specific value in all loadings due to a
do not have a great loss. Since the neuron distribution in constant NVF. The maximum von Mises stress in the RVE
the RVE with the NVF of 3% is denser than two other in the first 5 s is demonstrated in Fig. 14c. Considering this
NVF, increase in maximum tensile and compressive figure, the maximum von Mises stresses have risen by
stresses in NVF of 3% is larger than others. increasing the strain rate. These stresses are relaxed to a
To investigate the effect of strain rate on tissue, an RVE specific value and their relaxation times are almost equal.
with the NVF of 2% is considered. This element is loaded Also, it is obvious that the brain tissue is very vulnerable in
under four compressive loadings (1% strain) in the x di- trauma when there is a high strain rate. Figure 14d and
rection with loading times of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 (s). The e depicts the maximum tensile and compressive stress in
applied compressive strains for these four loadings are the x direction, respectively. It is revealed that the com-
demonstrated in Fig. 14a. This figure shows that the pressive stress is higher than tensile stress and relaxed to a
relaxed strain is the same in all loading times. Also, specific value. In all of these figures, the relaxed stresses
Fig. 14b shows the mean volume stress in the RVE for four are the same.
different strain rate loadings. It is observed that the mean As the last analysis, the effects of neurons distribution
volume stress increases by increasing the strain rate and the on maximum tensile and compressive stress in the loading
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
0.012
0.01 30
25
0.008
0.05 20
Smean (Pa)
0.006 0.05
e11
0.1 15
0.1
0.004 0.2
10 0.2
0.3
0.002 0.3
5
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time (s) Time (s)
(a) (b)
1000
250 900
800
200 700
S11,max (Pa)
600
Smises (Pa)
150 0.05
0.05 500
400 0.1
100 0.1
300 0.2
0.2
50 200 0.3
0.3
100
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time (s) Time (s)
(c) (d)
1200
1000
800
S11,max (Pa)
0.05
600
0.1
400 0.2
200 0.3
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time (s)
(e)
Fig. 14 a Applied strain on the model for different durations of d corresponding maximum tensile stresses in the x direction and
0.05 s, 0.1 s, 0.2 s and 0.3 s, b corresponding mean volumetric e corresponding maximum compressive stresses in the x direction
stresses in the x direction, c corresponding von Mises stresses,
direction and also von Mises stress are investigated. Fig- difference can affect the distribution of local stresses (and
ure 15a shows the von Mises stress in a relaxation test for even the maximum stress) in the tissue.
three different neuron distributions where there is not any
reason for being equal von Mises stress. In this figure, von
Mises stresses have markedly declined but relaxed to a 4 Conclusion
specific value in each distribution. Figure 15b, c demon-
strates the maximum tensile and compressive stresses in In this paper, a three-dimensional micromechanical
the x direction for three different neuron distributions, homogenized RVE of the cerebral cortex tissue considering
respectively. It is observed that maximum stresses are random distributed nerve cells in the ECM was developed.
different and the stresses have no sharp drop in both charts. This is a computational tool to simulate the actual loading
Also, great difference between two distributions in maxi- applied on brain tissue like trauma. The primary goal of
mum tensile stress is not a reason to repeat the same this research was to propose a representative volume ele-
behavior for the maximum compressive stress where the ment (RVE) for cerebral cortex tissue by considering the
corresponding compressive stresses have less difference. nerve cells embedded in the ECM. The RVE was modeled
Finally, the results demonstrate that although different along with details of nerve cells including volume cell
irregular distributions of neurons have no effect on the meshed by 3D elements and axon and dendrites meshed by
mechanical properties of the tissue in a constant NVF, this 3D beam elements. Also, two viscoelastic models were
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
200 1200
180
160 1000
140 800
S11,max (Pa)
120
Smises (Pa)
(a) (b)
1200
1000
800
S11,max (Pa)
600 Generation1
Generation2
400
Generation3
200
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time (s)
(c)
Fig. 15 a von Mises stress and maximum, b tensile rxx and c compressive rxx of tissue with the NVF of 2% under loading in the x direction for
three different distributions of neurons in the ECM
assigned to neurons and ECM. To create an RVE without distribution effect on maximum tensile and compressive
any collision between nerve cells, a MATLAB code was stress and also von Mises stress was studied. von Mises
developed to distribute the nerve cells in the matrix. Then, stress markedly dropped but relaxed to a specific value in
a PYTHON code was developed to simulate the RVE each distribution. In contrast, maximum stresses had
employing the produced neuron’s geometry and coordinate slightly decreased in both tensile and compressive cases.
by the MATLAB code. After simulation of some RVE with Although different irregular distributions of neurons had no
the neuron volume fraction (NVF) of 1.5% for various effect on the bulk mechanical properties of the tissue with a
sizes of 300 lm, 400 lm, 700 lm, 900 lm and 1100 lm, constant NVF, this difference could affect the maximum
it was concluded that the RVE with size of 900lm is a local stress in the tissue.
suitable choice.
The effects of some parameters such as NVF, strain rate
loading and neurons distribution on the mechanical
Compliance with ethical standards
behavior of the cerebral cortex tissue RVE were investi-
gated. Three relaxation tests were performed on the RVE Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of
with the NVF of 1, 2 and 3%. The maximum tensile and interest.
compressive stress in the loading direction rose by
increasing the NVF. Since the neuron distribution in the
RVE with the NVF of 3% was denser than two others, References
increasing in maximum tensile and compressive stresses in
NVF of 3% was larger than others. In the following, four Abolfathi N et al (2009) A micromechanical procedure for modelling
the anisotropic mechanical properties of brain white matter.
compressive relaxation loadings (1% strain), in which Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 12(3):249–262
loading times were 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 (s), were applied Ambrosi D, Beloussov LV, Ciarletta P (2017) Mechanobiology and
on an RVE with the NVF of 2%. The mean volume stresses morphogenesis in living matter: a survey. Meccanica
and the maximum von Mises stresses rose by increasing the 52(14):3371–3387
Arbogast KB, Margulies SS (1999) A fiber-reinforced composite
strain rate, and both of them relaxed to a specific value in model of the viscoelastic behavior of the brainstem in shear.
all loadings due to a constant NVF. Also, it was concluded J Biomech 32(8):865–870
that the cerebral cortex tissue is very sensitive in trauma Bain AC, Meaney DF (2000) Tissue-level thresholds for axonal
when there is a high strain rate. Finally, the neurons damage in an experimental model of central nervous system
white matter injury. J Biomech Eng 122(6):615–622
123
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng
Bain AC, Shreiber DI, Meaney DF (2003) Modeling of microstruc- Meaney D (2003) Relationship between structural modeling and
tural kinematics during simple elongation of central nervous hyperelastic material behavior: application to CNS white matter.
system tissue. J Biomech Eng 125(6):798–804 Biomech Model Mechanobiol 1(4):279–293
Boresi AP, Schmidt RJ, Sidebottom OM (1993) Advanced mechanics Miller K, Chinzei K (1997) Constitutive modelling of brain tissue:
of materials, vol 6. Wiley, New York experiment and theory. J Biomech 30(11):1115–1121
Braitenberg V, Schüz A (2013) Cortex: statistics and geometry of Nemat-Nasser S, Hori M (2013) Micromechanics: overall properties
neuronal connectivity. Springer, Berlin of heterogeneous materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Brands DW, Bovendeerd PH, Wismans J (1999) On the potential Ning X et al (2006) A transversely isotropic viscoelastic constitutive
importance of non-linear viscoelastic material modelling for equation for brainstem undergoing finite deformation. J Biomech
numerical prediction of brain tissue response: test and applica- Eng 128(6):925–933
tion. In: SAE conference proceedings, SAE Oruc-de Leon J (2009) Development of a micromechanical compu-
Budday S et al (2017) Rheological characterization of human brain tational finite element model of a brain axon, The University of
tissue. Acta Biomater 60:315–329 Texas at San Antonio
Chatelin S, Deck C, Willinger R (2013) An anisotropic viscous Pan Y, Shreiber DI, Pelegri AA (2011) A transition model for finite
hyperelastic constitutive law for brain material finite-element element simulation of kinematics of central nervous system
modeling. J Biorheol 27(1–2):26–37 white matter. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58(12):3443–3446
Cloots R, van Dommelen J (2011) Multi-scale mechanics of traumatic Park E, Bell JD, Baker AJ (2008) Traumatic brain injury: Can the
brain injury. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology consequences be stopped? Can Med Assoc J 178(9):1163–1170
Cloots R et al (2008) Biomechanics of traumatic brain injury: Pfister BJ et al (2006) Development of transplantable nervous tissue
influences of the morphologic heterogeneities of the cerebral constructs comprised of stretch-grown axons. J Neurosci Meth-
cortex. Ann Biomed Eng 36(7):1203–1215 ods 153(1):95–103
Cloots RJ et al (2011) Micromechanics of diffuse axonal injury: Pierard O, Friebel C, Doghri I (2004) Mean-field homogenization of
influence of axonal orientation and anisotropy. Biomech Model multi-phase thermo-elastic composites: a general framework and
Mechanobiol 10(3):413–422 its validation. Compos Sci Technol 64(10):1587–1603
Cloots RJ et al (2013) Multi-scale mechanics of traumatic brain Prevost TP et al (2011) Dynamic mechanical response of brain tissue
injury: predicting axonal strains from head loads. Biomech in indentation in vivo, in situ and in vitro. Acta Biomater
Model Mechanobiol 12(1):137–150 7(12):4090–4101
Cowin SC (1999) Structural change in living tissues. Meccanica Przekwas A, Somayaji MR, Gupta RK (2016) Synaptic mechanisms
34(5):379–398 of blast-induced brain injury. Front Neurol 7:2
Documentation A (2010) ABAQUS analysis user’s manual, materials, Ramo NL et al (2018) Comparison of in vivo and ex vivo viscoelastic
other plasticity models, concrete behavior of the spinal cord. Acta Biomater 68:78–89
Faul M et al (2010) Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Rashid B, Destrade M, Gilchrist MD (2012) Inhomogeneous defor-
national estimates of prevalence and incidence, 2002–2006. mation of brain tissue during tension tests. Comput Mater Sci
Injury Prev 16(Suppl 1):A268–A268 64:295–300
Feng Y et al (2013) Measurements of mechanical anisotropy in brain Shaoning S (2014) Mechanical characterization and modeling of
tissue and implications for transversely isotropic material models polymer/clay nanocomposites
of white matter. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 23:117–132 Škrinjar O et al (2001) Steps toward a stereo-camera-guided
Ferrant M et al (2000) Registration of 3D intraoperative MR images biomechanical model for brain shift compensation. In: Informa-
of the brain using a finite element biomechanical model. In: tion processing in medical imaging, Springer
Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention– Sotudeh-Chafi M et al. (2008) A multi-scale finite element model for
MICCAI, Springer shock wave-induced axonal brain injury. In: ASME 2008
Garnich MR, Karami G (2004) Finite element micromechanics for summer bioengineering conference, American Society of
stiffness and strength of wavy fiber composites. J Compos Mater Mechanical Engineers
38(4):273–292 Valdez M, Balachandran B (2013) Longitudinal nonlinear wave
Hashin Z (1966) Viscoelastic fiber reinforced materials. AIAA J propagation through soft tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater
4(8):1411–1417 20:192–208
Javid S, Rezaei A, Karami G (2014) A micromechanical procedure Van Dommelen J et al (2010) Mechanical properties of brain tissue by
for viscoelastic characterization of the axons and ECM of the indentation: interregional variation. J Mech Behav Biomed
brainstem. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 30:290–299 Mater 3(2):158–166
Karami G et al (2009) A micromechanical hyperelastic modeling of Velardi F, Fraternali F, Angelillo M (2006) Anisotropic constitutive
brain white matter under large deformation. J Mech Behav equations and experimental tensile behavior of brain tissue.
Biomed Mater 2(3):243–254 Biomech Model Mechanobiol 5(1):53–61
Laksari K, Shafieian M, Darvish K (2012) Constitutive model for Wang HC, Wineman AS (1972) A mathematical model for the
brain tissue under finite compression. J Biomech 45(4):642–646 determination of viscoelastic behavior of brain in vivo—I
Mazrouei M et al (2014) Evaluating the effect of mechanical loading oscillatory response. J Biomech 5(5):431–446
on the effective thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube Yves R et al (2016) Applied RVE reconstruction and homogenization
reinforced polymers (a Monte-Carlo approach). Studies 22:24 of heterogeneous materials. Wiley, New York
123