Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Theory of Mind
Student’s Name
Institution
Course
Instructor
Date
2
Theory of Mind
Theory of mind (TOM), which includes the capacity to ruminate both your own and other
knowledge, and the understanding that other individuals may hold opinions that are different
from one person to another (Cuzzolin et al., 2020). When people have a theory of mind, it allows
them to perceive that others have unique concepts and goals that are distinctive from their own,
which allows them to partake in routine human connection as they decipher the cognitive states
and predict the conduct of those around them. The knowledge of the mind must mature in the
formative period. Young children are more inconsiderate and normally unable to evaluate the
psychological states of others. As individuals get older, their philosophy of thoughts matures and
changes. In order to understand human cognition, predict human behavior, communicate with
others, and settle interpersonal conflicts, people need to have a strong theory of mind.
Individuals are only sometimes birth awareness of the diversity of people's beliefs and
ambitions from themselves. Infants need several developmental antecedents to develop their
theory of mind. Individuals must first acquire specific skills in order to stand on the theory of
mind's platform, such as comprehending the idea of being seen, comprehending others'
motivations, and imitating them (Bjorklund, 2022). The preschool years, between 3 and 5, are
considered the key developmental period for this capacity to associate mental states. However,
mind propagates as a child gains more societal communication understanding. Youngsters can
have a profound appreciation of how different people's outlooks might contrast through
3
performance, make-believe play, fictions, and associations with close relative and peers.
Children learn more about how thinking affects behavior through social encounters as well.
The False Belief Task and how it relates to Theory of Mind Development
False belief tasks (FBT) are employed in most studies to gauge the theory of mind. Most
theory of mind investigations are conducted on newborns and toddlers. Since this model
developed, scholars have been attentive in the age at which individuals commence to embrace a
theory of mind. The false belief tasks assess how individuals contemplate about their judgements
and those of others. In the tasks, the kids must guess that someone else does not know something
they do (Kano et al., 2019). For example, children are asked what they expect to find in a candy
box after being shown that it contains pennies instead of candy. These activities are designed to
help kids conclude what others have done or are thinking when those conclusions disagree with
what they already know. In other words, even while kids may know something to be true, they
The Sally-Anne test, in which children are shown two dolls with the names Sally and
Anne; Sally has a basket, and Anne has a box, is one of the most popular false belief tests. After
putting a stone in her basket, Sally exits the room. Anne takes out the stone from the basket and
puts it in the carton while she is gone. After seeing this scene, we ask kids where they think Sally
will seek for the stone when she comes back (Brauner et al., 2018). The children's responses
reveal information about their mental models. If a child answers, "Sally will look in the basket,"
they have passed the exam. It shows that these kids know Sally's misconception regarding the
marble's actual location. Children must be able to consider what Sally believes and thinks in
order to pass the test. However, kids who claim the marble is in the box fail the test. They do not
show that they realize Sally knows distinct from their own. The false belief task is important to
4
TOM research because it demonstrates that kids understand that someone can be wrong about
something they understand. It is because the theory of mind involves the understanding that
every individual does not think and feel the same way as others. It enables people to anticipate
Results from False Belief Task Studies from Across the World
opinions, and concealed emotions are the five fundamental constituents of the theory of mind
that all children between the ages of three and five should develop sequentially (Brauner et al.,
2018). While the foundation for the development of the theory of mind appears to be laid by
these phases of development across demographic groups, diverse cultures place wavering
amounts of prominence on each of the five abilities, making some cultivate later than others. In
other words, the sequence in which these five developmental indicators are ingrained in a child's
memory depends on their cultural significance. Individuals who are valued more often advance
before those who are less valued. For instance, in individualistic countries like the U.S., the
capacity to acknowledge that people hold diverse perspectives and beliefs is given more weight.
This skill, however, is less valued in more collectivistic societies like China; therefore, it might
before different views. In contrast, information access was comprehended by participants from
Australia, who come from a more individualist society. Researchers theorize that this change in
the developmental order is due to the collectivism-based cultures in Iran and China, which
cultures in Western nations, which encourage individuality and respect diverse viewpoints. Due
5
to these disparate cultural norms, Iranian and Chinese children may need more time to
comprehend that others hold diverse thoughts and perspectives (Ruhl, 2020). It implies that
social and cultural factors and natural brain processes might influence the development of the
theory of mind. Markedly, the academics learned that the entire degrees of the theory of mind
mastery did not significantly vary between cultures, demonstrating that people from all cultures
The study by Bloom and German (2000) critiques and recommends deserting the FBT as
an assessment of the TOM. They explain that the capacity to think rationally about incorrect
beliefs is not required for the theory of mind to pass the FBT. The most challenging issue is that
tasks involving erroneous beliefs are inherently challenging. It is so that the youngster can at
least reason about a false belief, which is required for any task involving false beliefs.
Additionally, children struggle with common false belief activities even when not required to use
reasoning to evaluate false beliefs. The researchers found that the theory of mind is more than
just passing the FBT (Bloom & German, 2000). Children can alter their behavior in response to
other people's knowledge states, and they may also have a tacit understanding of the
circumstances in which beliefs are formed. They conclude that success in a false belief task
indicates a child's intellectual ability more than failure. The task can be used to locate and study
adults, older children, and those with language and mental impairments..
Conclusion
Theory of mind involves a person's ability to take into account both their own and other
people's mental states. The investigation on the theory of mind uses false belief tasks to assess
6
how individuals deliberate about their views and those of others. The false belief task is
important to TOM research because it demonstrates that children understand that someone can
be wrong about something they understand. While the foundation for the development of the
theory of mind appears to be laid by these phases of development across demographic groups,
altered cultures put fluctuating amounts of importance on each of the abilities, making some
cultivate later than others. However, researchers found that the general degrees of the theory of
mind knwledge did not significantly change between cultures, demonstrating that people from all
References
Bjorklund, D. F. (2022). Children’s evolved learning abilities and their implications for
Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of
Braüner, T., Polyanskaya, I., & Blackburn, P. (2018). A logical investigation of false-belief tasks.
In CogSci.
Cuzzolin, F., Morelli, A., Cirstea, B., & Sahakian, B. J. (2020). Knowing me, knowing you: theory of
Kano, F., Krupenye, C., Hirata, S., Tomonaga, M., & Call, J. (2019). Great apes use self-experience to
Sciences, 116(42), 20904-20909.