Professional Documents
Culture Documents
20 - Francine and Jonathan - Grading-and-Report-1
20 - Francine and Jonathan - Grading-and-Report-1
Submitted by:
Submitted to:
II. OBJECTIVES
III. INTRODUCTION
Assigning student’s grades is an important component of teaching and many school districts
issue progress reports, interim reports, or midterm grades as well as final semester grades.
Traditionally these reports were printed on paper and sent home with students or mailed to students’
homes. Increasingly, school districts are using web-based grade management systems that allow
parents to access their child’s grades on each individual assessment as well as the progress reports and
final grades.
Grading can be frustrating for teachers as there are many factors to consider. In addition, report
cards typically summarize in the brief format a variety of assessments and so cannot provide much
information about students’ strengths and weaknesses. This means that report cards focus more on the
assessment of learning than the assessment for learning. There are several decisions that must be made
when assigning students’ grades and schools often have detailed policies that teachers must follow. In
the next section, we consider the major questions associated with grading.
IV. BODY
Grading and Reporting are the two final stages of educational evaluation. A grading system is a
system developed by schools to guide teachers in how to evaluate and grade student work. Whereas a
reporting system is a system developed by schools to organize assignment scores in grade books
(online or paper) and to determine final grades on report cards and transcripts.
The purpose of the grading system is to provide feedback to students so they can take control
of their own learning and to inform all those who support these students—teachers, special educators,
parents, and others. The purpose of the reporting system is to communicate student results to families,
colleges, and employers. Most importantly, these systems must convey clear information about the
skills students have mastered or areas where they need more support or practice.
Criterion-Referenced Grading System students are evaluated against an absolute scale (e.g.
95-100 = A, 88-94 = B, etc.). In Criterion-Reference Grading System the following are observed:
a. grades do NOT depend on what you are in, but only on your performance compared to a set
of standards.
b. Grading is a complex task, because grades must be clearly defining the domain, clearly
define and justify the performance standards, and be based on criterion-references
assessment.
There are guidelines for effective grading and reporting recommended for used in Philippine
schools:
1.) Describe grading procedures to students at the beginning of instruction.
2.) Clarify the course grade will be based on achievements only.
3.) Explain how other factors (effort, habits, etc.) will be reported.
4.) Relate grading procedures to intended learning outcomes.
5.) Obtain valid evidence (test, etc.) for assessing grades.
6.) Prevent cheating.
7.) Return and review all test results as soon as possible.
8.) Properly weight the various types of achievement included in the grades.
9.) Do not lower an achievement grade for tardiness, weak effort, or misbehavior.
10.) Be fair. Avoid bias. When in doubt, review the evidence. If still in doubt, give the highest
grade.
V. CONCLUSION
What do educators require in order to create grading and reporting practices that provide
accurate information about student learning? Clear thinking, careful planning, excellent
communication skills, and a genuine concern for the well-being of students are required. Combining
these abilities with our current understanding of effective practice will undoubtedly result in more
efficient and effective reporting.
VI. REFERENCES