Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/228126816
CITATIONS READS
22 4,028
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Abdul Azeez Maruf Olayemi on 09 November 2017.
By
Abstract
Dual banking system has emerged the current order of the global economic
system. The dualization of the banking system is generally construed in the context
of the practicing of the non-interest Islamic banking system alongside the
conventional interest-based banking system. The system is currently in practice in
the best economic jurisdictions of the world, and it has been proved to be viable.
Hence, the Nigerian federal government moves to improve its banking system, by
its dualization to meet the country’s economic challenges. However, the proposal
is met with stiff rejection from a religious group. This paper takes a critical look at
the premises on which the objection is based. It also examined the legal basis for
the introducing of the product into the Nigerian banking system. Nevertheless, the
outcome of the study shows that, the introducing of the non-interest Islamic
banking product into the Nigeria banking system is lawful and its benefits to the
country abounds.
1. Introduction:
Nations, like plants and human beings, grow. And if the development is thwarted they are
dwarfed and overshadowed.’2 Aspiring to grow and join the league of the advanced economic
countries of the world, the Nigerian federal government through the Central Bank of Nigeria
(CBN), approved the introduction of Non-Interest Financial Institution vis-a-vis the Islamic
1
Abdul Azeez Maruf Olayemi is a Ph.D research candidate in International Islamic University, Malaysia. He can be
reached on E-mail: ma1129uk@yahoo.co.uk, or educationola@yahoo.com.
2
Claude Mckay, Claude Mckay Quotes <http://www.people.ubr.com/authors/by-first-name/c/claude-mckay/claude-
mckay-quotes/nations-like-plants.aspx>(Retrived on 30/09/2011).
decades around the world and it has emerged as the most impermeable shield against all sort of
economic downturn. The system is in practice across the world, including some of the most
economically strong countries, such as UK4, USA5, Germany6, Italy7, France8, Singapore9,
Japan10, China11, Malaysia12, Australia, South Africa13 and even the Vatican city14, to mention a
few.
Surprisingly, the disposition of the Central Bank is perceived by some group as a way of
promoting Islamic religion in the country.15 This generated a very heated and a dangerous debate
that includes threat of legal battle and war-fair from both side of the argument16. The questions
that are raised by the anti-Islamic banking group include; alleged disparity in the definitions of
‘Non-Interest Financial Institution’, between the Guideline of the Non-Interest Financial, 2011,
and the Banking and other Financial Institution Act, (BOFIA), 1991, the irrelevancy of Religious
3
Mustapha Salihu, Soludo approved Islamic banking – Sanusi, <
http://www.punchng.com/Articl.aspx?theartic=Art20110704134654>(retrieved on 4 Jul 2011)
4
Islamic Bank of Britain (IBB) plc, PO Box 12461, Birmingham, B16 6AQ< http://www.islamic-
bank.com/>(retrieved on 01/09/2011).
5
Paul Wiseman, Islamic loans turn profit for banks in USA, USA TODAY, osted 3/26/2008, <
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2008-03-26-islamic-finance-sharia_N.htm>(01/09/2011).
6
Germany: Deutsche Bank Launches Sharia-Compatible Funds, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2006, <
Http://Islamineurope.Blogspot.Com/2006/12/Germany-Deutsche-Bank-Launches-Sharia.Html >(01/09/2011).
7
Italy: First Islamic bank in Italy to open in 2008, <
http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Business/?id=1.0.1351258771>(01/09/2011).
8
Eleanor Beardsley, France Adjusts Laws To Allow Islamic Banking, October 13, 2009, <
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113742191 >(01/09/2011).
9
1st Islamic Bank in Singapore, Publication time: 8 May 2007, 08:14,
<http://kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2007/05/08/8232.shtml > (01/09/2011).
10
Jasim Ali, Islamic finance is gaining importance in non-Muslim nations,
<http://islamicbanking.blogsome.com/category/islamic-banking-news/japan/>(01/09/2011).
11
Islamic finance reaches China, August 26th, 2009, <http://www.silkroadeconomy.com/2009/08/26/islamic-
finance-reaches-china/>(01/09/2011).
12
See,< http://www.bnm.gov.my/index.php?ch=13&cat=banking&type=IB>,(01/09/2011).
13
Islamic Banking in Africa,< http://www.halaljournal.com/article/3802/islamic-banking-in-africa >(01/09/2011).
14
Developments in Islamic Banking,
<http://www.oikonomia.it/pages/2003/2003_febbraio/avvenimenti_2.htm>(retrieved 01/09/2010).
15
The body that opposed Islamic banking are not the Christian community in Nigeria. The people that oppose it are
the Christian politician that find their way into the exalted office of CAN.
16
See,< http://www.punchng.com/Articl.aspx?theartic=Art20110727115281>(retrieved on 22/09/2011).
non-Muslims in the services of the Islamic bank in the country, the presumed impossibility of the
upholding of the principle of ‘Federal Character’ as enshrined in the Nigeria constitution, in the
composition of the membership of the CBN Council of Shariah/Council of experts, and finally,
the protagonists of Islamic banking insist that Islamic banking is actually enshrined in the
Nigerian banking legal framework.17 They maintain that the arguments of the antagonist of
Islamic banking do not hold water. In their opinion, it is a mere inclination to religious sentiment
which are antitheism to patriotism. They conclude that the act is a savagery and superfluous.
To start with, the protagonists of Islamic banking maintain that the introduction of Islamic
banking into the Nigerian banking system is lawful and appropriate, given the legal provisions
on its establishment and the prospects it has in the country, in the one hand. In the other hand,
they argues that it is intellectually and legally erroneous for the antagonist of the Islamic
banking, to ignore the reality of the legality of the inclusion of the product in the Nigerian
banking system on the bases of mere inclination to religious sentiment. They emphasis that such
disposition is contrary to the provisions of the Nigerian banking legal system,18 and that it is
unpatriotic and inhumane for them to overlook the benefits the introduction of the product will
17
Section 61, BOFIA, 1991.
18
Ibid.
3
bring to the country, in terms of job creation to cater for the problem of the teaming unemployed
graduates in the country, as well as the attracting of foreign investments from the most wealthiest
investors of the world who are located in Gulf Cooperation Countries (GCC). The practice of
Islamic banking will attract the investors, and such investment will certainly contribute
In addition, they then lament that it is surprising that, the educated class of the group will allow
so few politically minded people from their midst to met intellectual ignominy to the country
before the international community, as their vehement rejection of the Islamic banking
institution purports the obsoleteness of our educational curricular. Otherwise, the claim of
ignorance about a system which is currently part of the economic globalization is an hoax. It is
an indication that Nigeria is lagging behind in this area. They add that worst of all, is their
abdication of the principles of objectivism, positivism, pragmatism, and realism which are the
guiding light in any intellectual discourse, and instead, confusingly or hypocritically, clutch to
some Sections of the Nigerian statutes, in all attempts to quash the introduction of the Islamic
Moreover, the group asserts that Islamic banking which is a product of the Non-Interest
Financial Institution is overtly provided for under the Nigerian Banking legal framework. The
developing of the Guideline for the supervision and regulation of Islamic banking as a category
of the Non-Interest Financial system is based on the provision of Section 33 (1) (b) of the Central
Bank of Nigeria Act, (CBN), 2007, which empowers the Central Bank of Nigeria to ‘issue
4
guideline to any person and any institution under its supervision’19 to carry out banking services.
Section 23 (1)re-asserted this legal framework with a provision in that ‘profit and loss sharing
banks’ are less affected by the provision that binds other banks. The Section exonerates ‘profit
and loss sharing banks’ from the requirement of mandatory display of information on the interest
rates of their lending and deposits and the rendering of such information to the Central Bank of
Nigeria’.
In addition, Section 52 gives Central Bank governor the discretionary power to ‘exempt
community banks or profit and loss sharing banks from the provision’20 of BOFIA, 1991.
Likewise, Section 55 (2) of the Act gives the Central Bank Governor the power to make ‘rules
and regulations for the operation and control of all institutions under the supervision21’ of the
Central Bank, while Section 61 of the Banks and other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA), 1991
(as amended) overtly lay the legal foundation for the establishment of special bank, including the
‘profit and loss sharing banks’ in the country. This is the Section that defines Profit and loss
sharing banking as ‘a bank which transacts investment or commercial banking business and
maintains profits and loss sharing accounts’,22 which is nothing but the disputed Islamic banking
system.
The group emphasis, that Islamic banking vis-à-vis profit and loss sharing banking is provided
for, in the Section 4 (1) (c) of the Regulation on the Scope of Banking Activities and Ancillary
Matters, No 3, 2010. The Section states that; ‘… the only types of banks that will be permitted to
19
Section 33(1) (b) of the Central Bank of Nigeria Act, (CBN), 2007.
20
Section 52, ),BOFIA, 1991.
21
Section 55 (2),BOFIA, 1991.
22
Section 61, Ibid.
5
carry on banking business in Nigeria under BOFIA (are): (a) Commercial banks; (b) Merchant
banks; and (c) Specialized banks, which include non-interest banks, microfinance banks,
development banks and mortgage bank.’23 it shall be read together with the provisions of the
relevant Sections of BOFIA, 1991 (as amended), the CBN Act 2007, Companies and Allied
Matters Act (CAMA), 1990 (as amended), and the other circular and Guidelines that are issued
In a nutshell, the protagonists of Islamic banking therefore conclude that it was the diligent and
brilliant work of the Nigerian legislature that culminated in the legality of introducing profit and
loss banking, otherwise known as Islamic banking into the Nigerian banking system. Therefore,
it is the Nigerian lawmakers in their wisdom who envision the need for Nigeria to join the league
of the nations that practice dual banking system by allowing the operation of Islamic banking.
However, having adduced the argument of the protagonists of Islamic banking in Nigeria, as
examine the premises on which the arguments of the antagonists of Islamic banking funded.
The antagonist of Islamic banking in their part, premised their arguments on four different legal
questions regarding the Nigerian banking legal framework. The arguments are as follow:
23
Regulation on the Scope of Banking Activities and Ancillary Matters, No 3, 2010.
24
Section 3.1, Framework for the Regulation and Supervision of Institutions Offering Non-Interest Financial
Services in Nigeria, FPR/DIR/CIR/GEN/01/010, January 13, 2011.
6
a. That there is Variation in the Definition of ‘Non-Interest Financial Institution’ between
‘BOFIA 1991’ and ‘NIFI Guideline,2011’
The antagonists of Islamic banking claim that there is a variation between the definitions of
‘Non-Interest Financial Institution/ Profit and loss banking’ in BOFIA, 1991 and the Guideline
of Non-Interest Financial Institution, 2011, and consequently, alleged that the introduction of
However, the protagonists of Islamic banking argue in this regard that the claimed of variation or
contradiction in the definitions of such laws is nothing but a mere intellectual confusion. They
assert that, had the antagonists of Islamic banking taken a critical look at the definitions with a
view to sustain objectivity, they would have realized that despite the appearance of differences in
the words of the definitions, the wordings do not defer as such, they are rather synonymous in
1. BOFIA, 1991, Section 61, Non-Interest Financial Institution is: a bank which transacts
investment or commercial banking business and maintains profits and loss sharing
accounts’.25
Thus, the reality is that the application of shariah rules and the principles of Islamic
jurisprudence are tantamount to the operation of ‘profit and loss sharing account as reflects in the
Section 61 of BOFIA, 1991. Therefore, the argument that the establishment of Islamic banking is
25
BOFIA, 1991, Section 61
26
The Guideline of Non-Interest Financial Institution, 2011.
7
illegal based on the alleged inconsistency of definitions does not arise in any way because what
the principles of shariah and the rules of Islamic commercial jurisprudence requires in banking
system is the operation of ‘profit and loss sharing account. In fact, it is this statute (as the
paramount regulatory law for banking in Nigeria) that provides for the establishment of Non-
Interest Financial Institutions in the country, and in reality, the only overtly known non-interest
banking system in the world today is Islamic banking. Thus, save if the hard-work of the
Nigerian legislature which led to the enactment of the Section 61 of BOFIA, 1991 will be
jeopardized, the only way to implement the Section 61 of BOFIA, 1991, is to give way for the
introduction of Islamic banking product into the Nigerian banking system. Undoubtedly, no
reasonable Nigerian will allow the hard work of his legislators to be jeopardized.
Moreover, the difference between BOFIA, 1991 and the NIFI Guideline, 2011, as legal
instruments, should be identified. BOFIA, 1991 is an Act of parliament while NIFI Guideline,
2011 is a delegated legislation which is meant to amplify and address the ambiguous and
unresolved areas in the Section 61 of BOFIA, 1991. The Guideline is to be explicit on all that is
required to put the Section into practice. In other words, a delegated legislation is a law which is
made by a person or body other than Parliament, such as the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN); the
law may be in the forms of a Guideline, Framework or Regulation. Its importance is to clarify
the parts of the statutes which need further clarification or explanation for proper
implementation27.
27
See, < http://www.lawteacher.net/english-legal-system/resources/delegated-legislation.php >(retrieved
28/08/2011).
8
Therefore, the function of the Guideline of NIFI 2011, in this sense, is to be explicit and specific
in its definition of Islamic banking, as against the generic definition of the Banking and Other
financial Institution Act (BOFID) 1991). Thus, the guideline shed light on the BOFIA, 1991’s
banking business and maintains profits and loss sharing accounts’, that it is;‘…a bank or other
financial institution under the purview of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), which transacts
banking business, engages in trading, investment and commercial activities as well as the
provision of financial products and services in accordance with the Shariah principles and rules
need for the explanation of the account that is maintained by Islamic bank.
A close study of the practices of Islamic banking system shows that the account which it
maintains in its operations is based on the doctrine of profit and loss sharing system.28 In other
words, Islamic bank maintains ‘profit and loss sharing account’ in all its practices.29 That is, at
both the micro and the macro levels of banking operation systems. For instance, although,
Islamic bank operates on the same template with the conventional bank, in term of the creation
of deposit facilities, such as deposit account, current account, saving account, investment account
etc. for the convenience of its customers, however, its practices defers from the conventional
practice as regards the contracts that governs the relationship between the bank and the
customers. The relationship between the depositors and the bank under the conventional banking
28
Ahmad Sanusi Hussin and Md. Ali bin Md. Sariff, Islamic Banking Handbook, Financial Sector Talent
Enrichment Programme, (Institut Bank-Bank Malaysia (35880), 2010), at 36.
29
Other models of the transaction of the bank such as al-Murabarah, BBA, al-Inah, al-Twaruq, etc… are also more
or less profit sharing system, because they are not interest based.
9
system is a ‘debtor-creditor relationship’30, whereas in the Islamic banking system, the
relationship between the depositor and the bank is ‘investor-entrepreneur relationship’,31 that is,
a partnership relationship.
Thus, while interest is paid to a depositor on his deposited money in the conventional bank, the
profits that accrue or loss that is incurred from the partnership of the ‘invested fund’ of the
depositor in the Islamic bank is shared between the bank and the customer. Mostly the contract
between a depositor and a bank under Islamic banking system is al-mudarabah contract32, which
simply means ‘profit sharing and loss bearing contract’. In this regard, the argument on whether
Islamic bank product is inclusive in the Non-Interest Financial institution which was generally
provided for in the Section 61 of BOFIA, 1991, and was explicitly clarify in the Guideline of
NIFI 2011, is unfounded; it has no basis in fact and in law. The introduction of Islamic banking
into Nigerian banking system is based on nothing, but the profit and loss sharing account as
Furthermore, looking at the macro level of the Islamic banking operations, that is, the Islamic
financial market transaction which includes; the capital market, money market, the forex market
etc. In reality, the products are known in the conventional banking system. However, the Islamic
banking fashion of the products defers, in that, its operation in the macro level is based on
investor and entrepreneur relationship in the capital market, and between the central bank and the
commercial banks and other financial institutions in the money market, and among the banks and
other financial institution in the interbank money market, as opposed to the creditor-debtor
30
T. A. Ibitoye & O. A. Ajayi, Elements of Banking, (Ibadan: Bash-Moses Printing Company, 1999), at 154.
31
Ahmad Sanusi Hussin and Md. Ali bin Md. Sariff, ibid.
32
Ibid.
10
relationship of the conventional system. In short the relationship of the participants in the macro
level of the Islamic financial institution is basically profit and loss sharing relationship otherwise
Thus, it can be seen that the macro and micro levels of the banking system which are the core
areas of the banking system, are operated on the basis of profit and loss sharing in the Islamic
banking system. Therefore, it will be illogical to conclude that merely because Islamic banking
draws its modus operandi from the principles of Islamic law of transaction ‘al-muamalat’, which
forbids usury, gambling, speculations, uncertainty, but legalizes trade and the principle of justice
(certainty) in its dealings, the ‘profit and loss sharing’ of its model is not in tandem with the
provision of the Section 61 of BOFIA 1991. This statutory provision does not draw any line of
demarcation between the practices of ‘profit and loss sharing accounts’ of the Non-Interest
Financial Institution systems. It is actually inclusive of the Islamic banking product and any
other credible profit and loss sharing products of the banking system.
In this regard, it can only be logical and reasonable to insist that, the Banking and other Financial
Institutions Act (BOFIA) 1991, provides for, and legalizes the operation of Non-Interest
Financial Institution which it defines as a system which ‘maintains profit and loss sharing
account.’ In extension, since Islamic banking is a non-interest banking product which also
maintains a ‘profit and loss sharing account’ its introduction, establishment and operation,
whether partially through the opening of window system in the available conventional banks, or
33
Ibid, 176.
11
fully, such as that of Jaiz Bank international34, is legal and lawful, pursuant to the provision of
Section 61 of BOFIA 1991. In fact, the law that establishes Islamic banking and other related
banking practices in Nigeria is the Banking and Other Financial Act (BFIA) 1991. The NIFI
To sum up, it is proper to assert that, suppose the Section that provides for the establishment of
Non-Interest Financial Institution in Nigeria is not in existence, it would have been ultra vires for
the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to develop the Guideline of NIFI, 2011, to serve as a
framework for the operation of the Non-Interest Financial Institutions, including the Islamic
banking product. As mentioned early. BOFIA, 1991 is the paramount law of the Nigerian
banking system, from which all the guidelines that are developed by the Central Bank of Nigeria
CBN, for the various financial activities, whether it is conventional or Islamic, are drawn. Thus,
the duty of the Central Bank of Nigeria is to develop guidelines on the bases of the existing
provisions of the statute, which was what the CBN did in this respect. Therefore the CBN does
not in any way, contravene or violate any law, since what it did was actually, the performance of
its duty.35
Enormous concern and anxiety have been demonstrated, as to whether Islamic bank will give
equal right and opportunity to non-Muslims and the Muslims in its services. In reality, the
anxiety is a mere lack of understanding of the operations of the Islamic law of transaction. The
34
See, <http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/cbn-licenses-first-islamic-bank-in-nigeria/93594/>(retrieved
01/09/2011).
35
Section 33(1) (b) of the Central Bank of Nigeria Act, (CBN), 2007.
12
Islamic law of transaction ‘al-muamalat’, of which Islamic banking is a branch does not, in any
way, precludes non-Muslim from transacting under its purview. That is to say that, the Islamic
commercial law which is an embodiment of the rules of contracts, agreements, obligations and
liabilities does not differentiate between the human family whether they are Muslims or non-
Muslims.
The practice of shariah in the contemporary time is different, in any way, from that of the early
period. The application of the rules of Islamic law of transactions on the contracts that exist
between the Muslims and non-Muslims in those days was apparent. One of the ever glaring
examples on this was some of the transactions that existed between the Holy Prophets
Muhammad (S. A .W) and some non-Muslim. For instance, at the time of the demise of the Holy
Prophet (S. A. W.), his amour was in the custody of a Jewish merchant. The prophet had
received the loan of food from the person for his family, and placed his armour with him as
collateral for the loan.36 In this case, if the holy Prophet (S. A. W.) would go that far in
transacting with a Jewish, ‘a non-Muslim’, what then will restrict a Nigerian non-Muslim from
benefiting from the services of the Islamic banking product, vis-à-vis, investment, employment
Furthermore, the study of the contemporary practice of Islamic banking across in the world
shows that the bank is an institution which renders its services to the general public, regardless of
their religious profession, affiliation or inclination. For example, one of the countries that boast
the most developed product of the Islamic banking in the world today is the United Kingdom
36
Hadrat Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmad, Life Of Muhammadsa, (UK: Islam International Publicatins Limited,
2005) , at 300.
13
‘UK.’37 The country is only second to Malaysia in this respect. Despite the fact that the majority
of the populations of the country are Christians38. Similarly, although, the Muslims in Malaysia
outnumbered the non-Muslims, as they constitute the 60.4% of the total population, like
Nigeria,39 however, there are other major religious groups in the country. These include the
Buddhism, 19.2%, Hinduism 6.3%, Christianity 9.1%, and the others 2.6%.40 Imaginably, if
Islamic banking is meant to serve only the Muslim communities, how would these countries
emerge as global hubs of Islamic banking? All the members of the various religious groups in
these countries are strong participants in the Islamic banking system, regardless of their religious
diversity. They participate as depositors, investors and employees of the bank. In fact, this is
what culminates into the rapid growth and development of the Islamic banking system in the
world today. The Islamic banking practice in Nigeria cannot be different from the other practice
In a nutshell, Nigerians, whatever their religion might be, should be rest assured that the
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, (as amended) has preserved their right to
derive benefit from any economic out-fit in the country. The Section [16 (1) (d)] of the
constitution preserves this right ‘without prejudice to the right of any person to participate in
area of the economy within the major sector of the economy, protect the right of every citizen to
engage in any economic activities outside the major sectors of the economy’41. Therefore, no
37
Michael Ainley, Ali Mashayekhi, Robert Hicks, Arshadur Rahman and Ali Ravali, Islamic Finance in the UK:
Regulation and Challenge, Financial Services Authority, 2007, at 6.
38
Richard Kerbaj, Muslim population 'rising 10 times faster than rest of society', January 30, 2009, The Times, <
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5621482.ece >(02/09/2011).
39
CIA - The World Factbook - Nigeria, see, < https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
factbook/geos/ni.html#People >(retrieved 02/09/2011).
40
Malaysian government statistics department (2001). "Population and Housing Census 2000". Web.archive.org.
Archived from the original on 23 March 2007. (Retrieved 27 October 2010).
41
Section 16 (1) (d), Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999.
14
Nigerian shall be deprived of the benefits of the Non-Interest financing system of the Islamic
banking system, in term of investment, deposit, financings, employment etc. What Islamic bank
stands for is the realization of the principles of equity, justice and fairness, and most importantly
the safeguarding of the economic system from derailing through the interest based practices.
c. That the Composition of the Shariah Council/ Council of Experts Violates the Principle
of Federal Character:
Another issue that requires critical discussion is the misconception over the creation of the
Sahriah Council or the Council of Experts to assist the Central Bank on the supervision and
regulation of Islamic banking practices in Nigeria, as well as the creation of Shariah Boards and
the employing of a Shariah advisor in each of the Banks that practice Islamic banking or opens
Islamic banking window42. This is in accordance with provision of the Guideline of the Non-
Interest Financial Institutions, 2011. The Guideline states that ‘the ‘duty of ‘the CBN Council of
experts or Shariah Council’43 is to advise the Central Bank of Nigeria CBN on shariah matters
for the effective regulation and supervision of non-interest financial institutions in the country44.
However, the antagonists of Islamic banking contend in this regard that, since the council of
shariah experts will be comprised mainly of the experts of Shariah law, there is tendency that
some geopolitical zones or states of the federation will not be represented in the council. They
therefore, conclude that the creation of the council is illegal because it will not conform to the
42
Section 5.1, Guideline on non-Interest Window and Branch Operations of Conventional Banks and other Financial
Institutions,Financial Policy & Regulation Department Central Bank of Nigeria, Abuja, December 31, 2010.
43
Section 9.0, Framework for the Regulation and Supervision of Institutions Offering Non-Interest Financial
Services in Nigeria, FPR/DIR/CIR/GEN/010, January 13, 2011.
44
INFI Guideline, 2011, ibid.
15
Principle of ‘Federal Character’ which was enshrined in the Section 14 (3) of the constitution of
However, the protagonist of Islamic banking maintains that the present argument is not different
from the previous ones. They emphasis that the argument is unnecessary, given that, it is the
Banking and other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA), 1991 which provides for the
that the law has implicitly provided for all that is necessary for the operation of the bank. This is
because the Shariah council or Council of Expert is an integral part of Non-Interest Financial
Institution product of Islamic Banking. Thus, since BOFIA, 1991 is economical in its definition
of the system, it is necessary that the Guideline of the Non-Interest Financial Institution,2011
which is an operational framework that was developed on the bases of Section 16 of BOFIA,
1991 be explicit in this respect. This is what was done by the Guideline.
Moreover, they refer to the argument as to whether the creation of Council of Shariah in the
CBN violates the principle of the ‘federal character’ or not as a weak attempt of playing to the
gallery. This is because the claim is premature. The antagonists of Islamic banking in Nigeria
need not to cross a bridge before they arrive at it. All the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria are
blessed with experts of Islamic law ‘shariah, including the south-south, south-east and north
central zones that are predominantly non-Muslim. Therefore, the principle of federal character as
enshrined in the constitution needs not to be violated in the composition of the members of the
Council of Shariah since all the geopolitical zones of the country can be represented. However, it
must be emphasized that the fact that the principle of federal character will be observed in the
16
composition of the shariah council of the Central Bank does not negate the requirement of
Therefore, the composition of the members of the shariah council, in the Central Bank or in the
Shariah board of any bank that operate Islamic banking or opens a window for the system must
strictly be comprised of only the experts of shariah law whose areas of specialization is ‘Islamic
In the other words, if Islamic banking is going to thrive and be successful in Nigeria, like that of
the other countries of the world, such as those of Asia, America, Europe and even some African
countries, the members of the Shariah board must strictly be experts of the modern Islamic law
of banking, securities and takaful. This must be emphasized because, not every scholar of shariah
is a specialist in the area of Islamic banking. In fact, one of the challenges that face the Islamic
banking system today globally is the dearth of experts of Islamic law of Banking, Security and
Takaful. The experts of Islamic law of banking are very scanty. Therefore, the Nigerian nascent
system of Islamic banking needs to thread with caution.45 Nevertheless, the principle of ‘federal
character’ as enshrined in the constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria must be observed.
The section (14 (3)) of the constitution, states that ‘the composition of the government or in any
of its agencies and the conduct of its affairs shall be carried out in such a manner as to reflect
the federal character of Nigeria and the need to promote national unity, and also to command
national loyalty, thereby ensuring that there shall be no predominance of persons from a few
state or from a few ethnic or other sectional groups in that Government or in any of its
45
Azrul Azwar Ahmad Tajudin, Overview of Islamic Finance, (Kuala Lumpur: Bank Islam, 13 December 2010), at
45.
17
agencies’46. This principle must be implemented in the composition of Shariah council of the
d. That the Introduction of Islamic Banking into Nigeria is the part of the agenda of
Islamization of the Country:
In response, the protagonists of Islamic banking perceive this argument as laughable, illogical
and outright the unpragmatic segment of the discourse. They add that this is the argument which
exposes the innate sentimental disposition of the antagonists of Islamic banking, and that it is a
excommunicated way of settling scores. This type of diverting from the main argument was the
instrument which was adduced by the same group to compel the Nigeria federal government in
198647 to shelve its proposal of joining OIC and later IDB, purposefully, to receive interest free
loan from the organizations, to executive the developmental goals of the country. The
government was rather forced to obtain interest-base-loan which hitherto has subjected the
country to the slavery of endless payment of huge interest to date48. This is one of causes of the
Thus, the claim of ‘islamization’ is a hoax. It is only meant to bully the gullible and to mislead
the general public. Supposedly, can it be said that Islamic banking which is been mostly
championed by non-Muslim in the Western world is meant to Islamize the people? Is this claim
relevant to UK, USA, Germany, South Africa, Japan, Italy and even the Vatican City where
46
Section 14 (3), Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
47
Omo Omoruyi, AN APPEAL TO PRESIDENT OLUSEGUN OBASANJO: Nigeria: Neither an Islamic nor a
Christian Country,< http://www.biafraland.com/Islamization%20of%20Nigeria.htm >(retrieved 02/09/2011).
48
Esther O. Adegbite, The impact of Nigeria's external debt on economic development,<
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1733107&show=pdf >(retrieved 02/09/2011).
18
Islamic banking and finance is currently booming? The majority of the population of these
countries is non-Muslims. Yet, the practice of Islamic banking which is claimed to be the tool of
Islamizing Nigeria, is allowed to flourish in the countries, and it has contributed immensely to
their economic growth. Thus, the protagonists of Islamic banking questioned whether the
Nigerian anti-Islamic banking forces are claiming be more intelligent or more educated than the
citizens of those great nations? They continued that, as educated fellows, the antagonist of
Islamic banking should not have allowed sentiment to override their positive thinking. Education
is a guiding-light to the discovery of the means of solving the human problem. Undoubtedly,
Nevertheless, the antagonists of Islamic banking are poised of putting something on nothing, as
they resort to some Sections of Nigerian statutes to create the impression that will justify their
allegation of ‘islamization agenda’ of Islamic banking in Nigeria’. They erroneously claimed that
the imposition of the Guideline of Non-Interest Financial Institution (NIFI, 2011) ab initio; (1)
violates ‘the right to freedom of religion’ as enshrined in the Nigerian constitution that ‘every
person shall be entitled to freedom of thought, conscience and religion’,49 (2) that, the guideline
also contravene the principle of secularity of Nigeria, as provided in the constitution, that ‘the
government of the Federation or of a state shall not adopt any religion as state religion’50, and
finally (3) that it violate the section 9 (1) of the banking and financial institution Act (BOFIA),
1991, which states that; ‘Except with the written consent of the Governor; (a) no bank shall, as
from the commencement of this Decree be registered or incorporated with a name which
49
Section 38 (1) of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
50
Section 10 ibid.
19
“Christian”, “Islamic”, “Moslem”, “Qur’anic”, “Biblical”51. Thus, they draw the conclusion
that, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) will be violating these laws if Islamic banking product
The protagonist of Islamic banking respond to this argument that, first of all, it is quite
unfortunate that some Sections of the Nigerian statutes are been invoked in an attempt to retard
the development of the country and to deprive the citizens of the immense benefits of non-
interest Islamic banking system. They assert that it is a clear manifestation of playing on the
Nigerians intelligence.
They however, maintain that, the reality is that, none of the Nigerian statutes or laws is violated.
They explain that since the antagonists of Islamic banking have realized their failure before the
objective and positive minds of Nigerians, they try to achieve their goal by any means and
thereby clutch onto straw. Imaginably, if the establishment of federal commissions, such as the
Jerusalem Pilgrim Commission and the Hajj Commission which are part and parcel of the
executive harm of government, as well as the pilgrim welfare boards in the states level, which
are all maintained and financed with public funds cannot constitute the violation of the right of
the freedom of religion or amount to the adoption of state religion, in which way will the
establishment of Islamic bank, which legal status may not necessarily be a public corporation,
but, either a private or public companies, constitute the violation of the right of freedom of
religion or the adoption of state religion? Is it logical to say that a trading company which is
owned by a group of shareholders in the likeness of any other company amount to the violation
51
Section 9 (1) of the banking and financial institution Act (BOFIA), 1991
20
of freedom of religion and the adoption of state religion? Can the bank restrict any Nigerian from
In the other word, in which way will banks, such as the newly licensed Jaiz Bank International
which is to operate full Islamic banking system, and the Guarantee Trust Bank, Diamond Bank,
Zenith Bank, and the host of others that are aspiring to open Islamic banking windows, violate
the Section 9 (1) of BOFIA 1991, which prohibits the registration or incorporation of a bank
under the prohibited names. Although, the Islamic banking product draws its operational models
from the Shariah, it may not necessarily register under religious name, and of cause, most of the
banks are registered companies in the country already. Their aspirations are just for the inclusion
of the Islamic banking product in their practices. What should be understood is that Islamic bank
is a trading company. It is bond by all the laws that bind other banks. The fact that even a church
can invest in Islamic bank and use the produce/profit of the investment to finance its gospel or
evangelistic mission cannot be refuted. Then in which way does the introduction of Islamic
banking into the Nigerian banking system violate the fundamental right of freedom of religion
3. Conclusion:
To sum up, Nigerians should be rest assured that the introduction of Islamic banking into the
Nigerian banking system does not in any way violate any law. The definition of ‘profit and loss
sharing banking in BOFIA 1991 does not contradict that of the Guideline of NIFI 2011 as it was
claim. The allegations of the possible of discrimination against non-Muslims and violation of the
52
Qur’an 2. Verse 256.
21
‘Federal Character’ are premature and unrealistic. The claim of the implementation of the agenda
of the islamization of Nigeria (a democratic state for the matter) is a phobia. The truth is that
Islamic banking is a trading company which objective is to liberate the economic system from
the slavery of the interest based banking, and to justly and equitably distribute global wealth
To be frank, it is a high time for the Nigerian religious mongers to totally refrain from dragging
the country down. Islam and Christianity are of the same religious family.53 They are members of
the Abrahamic religious family.54. Instead of being the source of joy and happiness, these two
religions which are the cradle of modern civilization have been used by some unscrupulous
elements in various stages to foment chaos and jeopardize the country’s development. While the
role which was negatively played by the few Muslim bigots in this regard, is that of defensive,
reactionary and some times, unnecessary violence, the Christian supremacists’ role is offensive,
provocative, exploitative, and developmentally degradative. It must be noted that Islam and
Christianity are not the only religions in Nigeria. Nigeria is a multi-religions state. However, it is
only the Christian that opposed any developmental proposal that emanate from Islam, while the
Nigeria needs to emulate the Western world on its way to achieve developmental objectives. it
must be understood that the introduction of ‘Islamic banking’, which is rapidly growing in the
Western Hemisphere, into the Nigerian banking system, will not do but good to the country. The
disposition is not in violation of any law. Nigerians must learn to be tolerant and respect their
53
Hunter, Preston. "Major Religions of the World Ranked by Number of Adherents". See <
http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html >(23/09/2011).
54
The Abrahamic religion family are Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
22
religious differences. Any opportunity which will bring development to the nation, whether it is
from Islam, Christianity or even from the African Traditional Religions (ATR) must be earnestly
grabbed and utilized. This is one of the ways in which the country can develop. In this regard,
the antagonist of Islamic banking must see their opposition to the introduction of the banking
product into Nigerian as encroachment on the fundamental right of Nigerians in general. Their
Amazingly, it has been discovered that some of the leadership of the anti-Islamic banking forces
and their cohorts in the National Assembly who resolve to filibuster the introduction of Islamic
banking product into the Nigeria Banking system, are beneficiaries of the unique system of the
Islamic banking in the foreign land. They are some of the few biggest invest in the United Arab
Emirate and other GCC countries. They invested in the countries through the Islamic banks
system, and they benefit from it so much that they habitually enjoy the profits of their investment
by spending their holidays in the U. A. E. and other GCC states. Is it not funny then that this
same people resolve to deprive the larger Nigerians who are not opportune to travel to the GCC
23
Bibliography
Islamic Bank of Britain (IBB) plc, PO Box 12461, Birmingham, B16 6AQ< http://www.islamic-
bank.com/>(retrieved on 01/09/2011).
Paul Wiseman, Islamic loans turn profit for banks in USA, USA TODAY, osted 3/26/2008, <
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2008-03-26-islamic-finance-
sharia_N.htm>(01/09/2011).
Eleanor Beardsley, France Adjusts Laws To Allow Islamic Banking, October 13, 2009, <
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113742191 >(01/09/2011).
http://www.bnm.gov.my/index.php?ch=13&cat=banking&type=IB>,(01/09/2011).
24
The body that opposed Islamic banking are not the Christian community in Nigeria. The people
that oppose it are the Christian politician that find their way into the exalted office
of CAN.
http://www.lawteacher.net/english-legal-system/resources/delegated-legislation.php >(retrieved
28/08/2011).
http://www.punchng.com/Articl.aspx?theartic=Art20110727115281>(retrieved on 22/09/2011).
Hunter, Preston. "Major Religions of the World Ranked by Number of Adherents". See <
http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html >(23/09/2011).
Ahmad Sanusi Hussin and Md. Ali bin Md. Sariff, Islamic Banking Handbook, Financial Sector
Talent Enrichment Programme, (Institut Bank-Bank Malaysia (35880), 2010).
http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/cbn-licenses-first-islamic-bank-in-nigeria/93594/>(retrieved
01/09/2011).
Hadrat Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmad, Life Of Muhammadsa, (UK: Islam International
Publicatins Limited, 2005).
Michael Ainley, Ali Mashayekhi, Robert Hicks, Arshadur Rahman and Ali Ravali, Islamic
Finance in the UK: Regulation and Challenge, Financial Services Authority,
2007.
Richard Kerbaj, Muslim population 'rising 10 times faster than rest of society', January 30, 2009,
The Times, < http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5621482.ece
>(02/09/2011).
Malaysian government statistics department (2001). "Population and Housing Census 2000".
Web.archive.org. Archived from the original on 23 March 2007. (Retrieved 27
October 2010).
Azrul Azwar Ahmad Tajudin, Overview of Islamic Finance, (Kuala Lumpur: Bank Islam, 13
December 2010).
25
Esther O. Adegbite, The impact of Nigeria's external debt on economic development,<
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1733107&show=pdf
>(retrieved 02/09/2011).
Statutes:
Guideline on non-Interest Window and Branch Operations of Conventional Banks and other
Financial Institutions, Financial Policy & Regulation Department Central Bank of
Nigeria, Abuja, December 31, 2010.
Framework for the Regulation and Supervision of Institutions Offering Non-Interest Financial
Services in Nigeria, FPR/DIR/CIR/GEN/010, January 13, 2011.
26