Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As a rebuttal of the safety inspector’s The evidence cited fails to establish the
claim, the biologist’s reasoning is flawed conclusion because
in that it
(A) There is no evidence that the
(A) fails to explain why the number of reduction in behavior problems was
samples sent through the service proportionate to the reduction in
has increased food additive intake.
(B) fails to focus specifically on the (B) There is no way to know what
issue of rabies virus samples changes would have occurred
(C) overlooks the possibility that there without the change of diet, since
has been a change in the only children who changed to a
hazardousness of the rabies virus low-additive diet were studied.
samples themselves (C) Exactly how many children
(D) offers no defense of the university’s exhibited behavior problems after
need for continued delivery of the change in diet cannot be
rabies virus samples determined, since the size of the
(E) does not address the potential for group studied is not precisely given.
harm that is posed by the recent (D) There is no evidence that the
increase in the number of samples behavior of some of the children
sent through the service was unaffected by additives.
4. A large group of hyperactive children (E) The evidence is consistent with the
whose regular diets included food claim that some children exhibit
(F) more frequent behavior problems than they had exhibited when first
after being on the low-additive diet observed.
PrepTest 7 © 2003 Law School Admission Council, Inc. & PrepTest 8 © 2003 Law School Admission Council, Inc. & The Official
LSAT SuperPrep © 2007 Law School Admission Council, Inc.
whole, require fewer repairs than do
refrigerators of any other major brand.
5. Office manager: I will not order
recycled paper for the office. Our Neil: That is impossible. I have owned
letters to clients must make a good refrigerators of several different major
impression, so we cannot print them on brands, including Koolair, and the
inferior paper. Koolair needed more repairs than did
any of the others.
Stationery supplier: Recycled paper is
not necessarily inferior. In fact, from The reasoning in Neil’s response is
the beginning, the finest paper has flawed because he:
been made of recycled material. It was
(A) Uses a different notion of a
only in the 1850s that paper began to
product’s quality from that used by
be made from wood fiber, and then only
Eugenia
because there were no longer enough
(B) Contradicts Eugenia’s claim on the
rags to meet the demand for paper.
basis of a snap judgment and
In which one of the following ways does without making any attempt to
the stationer’s response fail to address offer supporting argumentation
the office manager’s objection to (C) Rejects a generalization on the basis
recycled paper? of a single negative instance when
that generalization has reasonable
(A) It does not recognize that the office
support and is not universal
manager’s prejudice against
(D) Uses a pretense of authority in a
recycled paper stems from
technical field as the only support
ignorance.
for his claim
(B) It uses irrelevant facts to justify a
(E) Concludes that what holds true of
claim about the disputed product.
each member of a group taken
(C) It assumes that the office manager
individually must also hold true of
is concerned about environmental
that group taken collectively
issues.
(D) It presupposes that the office
manager understands the basic
technology of paper manufacturing.
(E) It ignores the office manager’s
legitimate concern about quality.
6. Eugenia: Reliable tests have shown that 7. Large discount chains can make a profit
Koolair brand refrigerators are the even while offering low prices, because they
best-made of any of the major brands buy goods in large quantities at favorable
because they last longer, and, on the cost. This creates a problem for small
retailers. If they try to retain their
PrepTest 7 © 2003 Law School Admission Council, Inc. & PrepTest 8 © 2003 Law School Admission Council, Inc. & The Official
LSAT SuperPrep © 2007 Law School Admission Council, Inc.
customers by lowering prices to match time for her to do so if she leaves 45
those of large discount chains, the result is a minutes early. Therefore, since she hates
lower profit margin. But small retailers can taking the train, Marion cannot avoid being
retain their customer base without lowering late for work.
prices if they offer exceptional service.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed
Hence, small retailers that are forced to
because the argument
complete with large discount chains must
offer exceptional service in order to retain (A) Mistakes a situation that almost
their level of profitability. certainly affects many people for one
that affects a particular person alone
The reasoning is flawed because it fails to
(B) Ignores the fact that people often know
take into account the possibility that
something is the case without
(A) Not all large discount chains do in fact considering all the consequences that
make a profit follow from its being the case
(B) Some large discount chains have lower (C) Assumes without justification that
profit margins than do some small because people generally have an
retailers interest in avoiding a given result, any
(C) Small retailers are often motivated by particular person will have an interest in
things other than the desire for profit avoiding that result
(D) Not all small retailers are forced to (D) Treats evidence that someone will
compete with large discount chains adopt a particular course of action as
(E) Exceptional service is not the only though that evidence excluded the
reason customers prefer small retail possibility of an alternative course of
stores action
(E) Overlooks the possibility that someone
might occasionally adopt a given course
of action without having a good reason
for doing so
PrepTest 7 © 2003 Law School Admission Council, Inc. & PrepTest 8 © 2003 Law School Admission Council, Inc. & The Official
LSAT SuperPrep © 2007 Law School Admission Council, Inc.
PrepTest 7 © 2003 Law School Admission Council, Inc. & PrepTest 8 © 2003 Law School Admission Council, Inc. & The Official
LSAT SuperPrep © 2007 Law School Admission Council, Inc.