Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In reading the three case studies from this module, all of the companies showed a number
of issues that contributed to their failed projects. In ‘Rush to Failure,” the issues that were
mentioned were issues with the quality of the work performed. The project manager was willing
to sacrifice quality for speed and getting the project done within the desired timeframe instead of
getting it done efficiently and ensuring that the goal of the project was achieved. Following that,
it seemed that the goal of the project was not clear. One stakeholder suggested that REACH was
not meant to fix issues regarding solar arrays but would commit to fixing them while explaining
the original goal which was unrelated to fixing any solar issues (“Harvard Business Review
Press,” 2013, p. 91). Contractors were negligent and failed to fix the issues that were created.
The project manager contributed to this confusion by not having a data management system and
using unsuitable testing equipment that did not allow for proper assessments of the failed tests.
The team also lacked the proper incentives to motivate them to perform. In this case, I would
have investigated reducing some features of the product that we could go without and still be
able to achieve the project (Ward, 2007), and ensuring that the issues with REACH that require
A noted issue with the “Fargo Foods” case study was upper management’s inability to
distinguish rough estimates and schedules from hard estimates and schedules. Additionally, the
project managers did not have access to workers with sufficient technical skills to complete the
work at hand. The project managers were also reluctant to take on projects because they were
Project Management Issues
being set up for failure due to prolonged communications with upper management. There
was a lack of clear roles that likely contributed to this. Although upper management has a say in
the projects, they are trusting project managers to get the job done. Thus, the project managers
should be put in positions to express what is needed and communicate with stakeholders how
any hang-ups in time will extend the length and increase the cost of their projects ultimately
putting the project at risk for scope creep. In this case, I would want to set clear expectations for
upper management and work to get sufficient staff on board as team members. The project
managers assigned were also technical workers and having technical skills are important but do
Lastly, issues realized in “The Estimating Problem” involve the property manager being
unrealistic about the amount of time it would take to complete the project and not having skilled
workers to complete it. These two issues directly affect one another. In her quest to complete the
project in a timeframe that was much shorter than she should have estimated, she did not have a
team that was capable of accomplishing this and in fact, the team could not have completed the
project in the correctly estimated time because they simply lacked the skills and would’ve taken
a couple of extra weeks to complete it efficiently. In this case, I would suggest that Barbara get
more qualified members on the team or communicate that the project date will need to be
References:
Harvard Business Review Press. (2013). HBR Case Study: A rush to failure? HBR Guide to
Project Management (p. 91).
Ward, H. L. (2007). Five critical first steps in recovering troubled projects. Paper presented at
PMI® Global Congress 2007—Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.