Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lab Report
Practical #2
Objective:
To conduct a structural analysis on Aluminium strap( I Beam Structure )
having thickness of 6mm and supporting a load of 1800 N on its centre.
Now the second step follows the creation of two identical rectangles by using the rectangle by corner
command
Pre-Processor Modelling Create Areas Rectangle By Corners
The final step follows the subtraction of the following two identical rectangles using the Operate option
Pre-Processor Modelling Operate Booleans Areas
The dialog box will be prompted, the first selection is to be done using the area from which it is going to be
subtracted and in the second dialog box we’ll select the areas needed to be subtract. After performing the
operation, we are left with an I beam
Now for the problem, the selected material in Aluminum therefore we’ll go to
Material Props Material Models . Now going into Structural Linear Elastic and feeding in the
values of EX 70,000 Pa and PRXY 0.33
Final step in this process will include the defining the mesh size. This can be first by using defining the
mesh size using
Meshing Size Cntrls Manual Size and defining the element length size to 20, this can be reduced for a
finer mesh but this is suitable for the nature of the problem we are solving. The mesh will look like this
Now by going into Solution Solve Current LS. This will solve our problem and promt the command
window saying “Solution is Done”
Step #05 Results and General Post Processing
Now we can view the results of our choice analyze the results and find out if the beam is
suitable for the particular design load
1. Deformation shows satisfactory results as the beam is not subjecting to critical
deformation and is therefore very safe to say that the beam will not fracture.
2. By a nodal solution of the von mises stress, the maximum stresses are shown is around 136 MPA.
Where as aluminum has an allowable stresses of around 276 MPA. It is also very important to note
that the critical red region are very small and only around the corners which we have suspected
otherwise too by looking at the problem only that it will create a stress in the corners of the beam.
3. Stress intensity results also shows that stress is uniform and even around the edges.
Conclusion
All the results shown here in the analysis only indicate one thing, this beam is designed to
bear more load than defined in the problem, even the lower beam shows the blue region. In
other words if the beam needs to be optimized it can be made even shorter significantly by
reducing it’s height and even by reducing the dimension of the four corners.