Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Becoming a visionary
1 - Visionary Leadership
So we've talked about the first question, why do we do what we do, the core purpose.
The second question that we've discovered as part of these visions that really
compel people and create a shared sense of direction, the second question that you
have to be able to answer for your team is, what does success look like.
Some organizations that I've worked with call this their definition of victory or
their definition of success.
Play video starting at ::39 and follow transcript0:39
I'm going to share with you a couple of examples.
And just like the former question, then I'm going to ask you to, for your team,
think about what does success look like and how clearly is that defined today.
Play video starting at ::52 and follow transcript0:52
So here's an example of a core purpose statement.
This organization answered the first question,
why do we do what we do as follows.
To prevent and alleviate human suffering in the face of emergencies
by mobilizing the power of volunteers and the generosity of donors.
And guesses as to what organization this is?
Play video starting at :1:15 and follow transcript1:15
This is ultimately, still to this day, the American Red Cross,
who operates globally when there are events that cause human suffering.
And their purpose is to prevent and alleviate
that human suffering by mobilizing their resources, both people and money.
But what's really interesting about the American Red Cross as a global
organization is how they've defined success for
the organization, for the teams within that organization, and
ultimately the employees that choose to be part of this organization,
as well as all the partners that work with the American Red Cross.
Play video starting at :1:57 and follow transcript1:57
This is how the American Red Cross has answered the question,
what does success look like.
I want you to think about the organizations that you either work in
today or that you worked in before.
Play video starting at :2:9 and follow transcript2:09
Were those organizations as crystal clear as the American Red Cross about defining
what success ultimately looked like?
The American Red Cross, through its strong network of volunteers, donors,
partners, is always there in a time of need.
Play video starting at :2:24 and follow transcript2:24
We aspire to turn compassion into action so that.
And this is the really important piece of what the American Red Cross is doing here,
is they're defining for all of their various stakeholders, their, quote,
unquote, customers, what success looks like.
So for all people affected by disaster across the country,
around the world, that they receive care, shelter, and hope.
Play video starting at :2:49 and follow transcript2:49
Our communities are ready and prepared for disasters.
Play video starting at :2:54 and follow transcript2:54
Everyone in our country has access to safe, livesaving blood and blood products.
Play video starting at :3:1 and follow transcript3:01
All members of our armed services and their families find support and
comfort whenever needed.
And, finally, in a time of emergency, there are always
trained individuals nearby, ready to use their Red Cross skills to save lives.
I want you to think about what you see here.
How is the American Red Cross defining its vision
of what success ultimately looks like?
Play video starting at :3:30 and follow transcript3:30
One key point is they're defining each of their stakeholders,
whether it's the people affected by disaster,
whether it's the communities they work in, their home country,
members of the armed services, again people affected by emergency or the people
who need to go to these emergencies to help the folks who are in a time of need.
It identifies all the various stakeholders, but then it goes one step
further, which is to say, if we are successful as the American Red Cross,
then what is true for each of those stakeholders.
So for the people affected by disaster, they receive care, shelter, and hope.
For the communities that we work in, they are ready and prepared.
Play video starting at :4:12 and follow transcript4:12
For people, everyone in our country, they have access to blood and blood products.
So they're defining what this vision of success ultimately looks like.
In historical military terms, commanders often called this the commander's intent.
They knew that when soldiers got onto the battlefield, lots would change.
Play video starting at :4:33 and follow transcript4:33
Everything they had planned for,
there would always be something that was uncertain.
And so they talked about a commander's intent as being the vision for
ultimately what success looked like, so that when the soldiers went to battle,
they ultimately could figure it out in times of changing markets or changing
resources or changing environment, but they still had a vision for
what success looked like at the end of the day and they could adapt accordingly.
And that's why it's so critical, so important that you answer this second
question about what does success ultimately look like.
I would encourage you to go around to all of your team members,
even if you're not the formal leader of that team, and
ask them, do you have a clear understanding of what success looks like,
if we're successful, what does our world look like, for our customers, for
our employees, for any other stakeholders that you might have, and
see if you can get clear answers to that question.
And if you cannot, that presents an opportunity for you to then go engage with
those team members and work together to define what success looks like.
Let me give you another example.
We've done the American Red Cross.
Now let's go to a for-profit example.
This is again back to 1950.
We've talked about this company, so now you'll know it.
This is again from a historical document.
Play video starting at :5:55 and follow transcript5:55
With the company articulating if we're successful as a company,
here is what the world will look like.
Play video starting at :6:2 and follow transcript6:02
Here is what they said.
We will experience the sheer joy of innovation.
Let me stop there.
How many of you have ever worked in a team, a company,
an organization where that company was about the sheer joy of anything?
Play video starting at :6:16 and follow transcript6:16
In this company, ultimately Sony, their first statement about
if we're successful was, we will experience the sheer joy of innovation.
Play video starting at :6:27 and follow transcript6:27
And to continue, the application of technology for
the benefit and pleasure of the general public.
We will create products that become pervasive around the world.
We will be the first Japanese company to go into the U.S.
market and distribute directly.
We will succeed with innovations that U.S.
companies have failed at, such as the transistor radio.
Remember this is 1950.
If you do not know what a transistor radio is,
you should go search on the Internet to find out.
Fifty years from now, our
brand name will be as well known as any in the world and will signify innovation and
quality that rival the most innovative companies anywhere.
Important, Made in Japan will mean something fine, not something shoddy.
Again, if we think about this vision of what success looks like,
I would say Sony was pretty successful in their pursuit of
that vision of success, and their answer to the second question,
which is if we're successful, what will the world look like.
What's our definition of success?
So we've talked about what you say to create and communicate a compelling
vision, to motivate and inspire people to want to get behind that vision.
You have the three questions.
You have the check list.
You've seen examples and
now you've applied those tools those frameworks to your own team.
Now what I want to do is transition to the how you communicate that vision.
So transitioning from what you say to content,
the substance, to how you say it to style.
I'm gonna begin by sharing with you a video.
Play video starting at ::41 and follow transcript0:41
It's a video of someone who's communicating to their audience,
their employees.
Ultimately, you get to decide whether or not this is how you would
want to communicate, or how you might not want to communicate.
The video is of someone who I've had the opportunity to interact with
Steve Ballmer, the former CEO of Microsoft, and here you see us working
with him on a new leadership development application that we were developing.
Play video starting at :1:8 and follow transcript1:08
And Steve is one of the most gregarious,
most extroverted individuals I've ever met.
A very passionate individual.
The video I'm gonna share with you is a collection of
videos that are taken of him interacting with either Microsoft employees,
developers who are developing for the Microsoft platform, or otherwise.
And I want you to pay attention to what you see him doing
in terms of how he is communicating.
Not necessarily what but what's the language he's using,
what's the verbal and the nonverbal language?
And what's the meaning of that language to you, what meaning does it communicate?
D. Learn to be Charismatic
So by now, hopefully I have your attention,
that with these very subtle nonverbals you can actually have profound impact on your
ability to communicate your vision to your team.
What if I take that to an entirely other level and
tell you that you can actually learn to be charismatic?
Most of the audiences that I work with around the world,
whether they be in business government or otherwise.
Many people assume that charisma is either something you are born with or not.
Something I like to call you can either think or blame your parents for,
that hardwired genetic code.
And what we're actually finding is that's not the case at all.
What we're finding is that with some very subtle but
impactful feedback mechanisms and
training mechanisms you can actually learn to be charismatic, and ultimately be
able to communicate more effectively these visions that we're talking about.
One study I'll share with you in particular.
I had the opportunity to be one of the editors
on an article that John Antonakis wrote.
He and his colleagues wrote in the Academy of Management Learning and
Education journal back in 2011,
where it was the first time we'd ever published a scientific study
looking at could we actually develop, train, and learn this notion of charisma.
And what they did is they took a group of executives, and
they created a baseline charisma score.
Because some of us are naturally more charismatic than others, or
some of us have more practice, and so they took a baseline score of charisma.
They controlled for your age, whether you're male or female, speech length.
So they had them deliver speeches on camera and
the speeches were of different lengths.
So they wanted to control for that.
They also controlled for your language, whether or
not English was your native language or not.
And they took those baselines and then they created a training intervention.
And the training intervention consisted of three major components.
The first was a lecture on techniques for how to be more charismatic,
many of which I've included in the course that we're talking about now.
They also had you watch films or clips,
videos of people who were displaying many of these techniques,
much like the Dead Poet Society clip or the Charlie Chaplin,
Great Dictator clip that I had you watch as part of this course.
Then they also had you do one coaching session,
where you had an opportunity to work with a coach on a feedback report
where you were receiving and responding to feedback
on the speeches that you had delivered as part of this training intervention.
So very simple intervention.
Again, simple lecture, watching some video clips of people in action, getting some
coaching and some feedback on how you've done when you've delivered these speeches.
Then they followed up, with these people over the course of about three months.
And three months after that training intervention,
they measured their charisma again.
And, what I would like to share with you is the results of that.
Most notably,
what they've found is that with this very simple training intervention.
Three months gone by after that training intervention,
you saw a 13% increase in perceived charisma.
Meaning, how charismatic people,
other people saw the participants who had participated in the training.
Interestingly, you also saw a 14% increase in
the extent to which other people perceive those individuals as being competent.
Now interestingly, we find that charisma and competence.
The perceptions of those two factors are two very important factors for
determining whether people see you as leader-like or not.
And so when you think about your team, your organization,
whether they see you as a leader.
The extent to which you engage in many of the techniques,
the communication techniques, what you say and how you say it,
that we've talked about in this course, will ultimately determine how
charismatic other people see you as being, as well as how competent they see you.
And ultimately whether they see you as someone who is fit to lead
them into the future.
Critically important.
As you go forward.
One last study I'll share with you, one of my favorite studies
on this notion of visionary leadership and the idea of charisma,
is Bob House and his colleagues in the early 1990s.
So now, many years ago, published a study on presidents for
the United States dating back to George Washington all the way up to Carter.
They analyzed speeches, editorials written by and about the presidents.
They analyzed biographies.
All with an idea of getting an assessment of the charisma
of each of these presidents in the United States.
Some of these presidents, Tyler, Pierce, Buchanan, and
others, were deemed as non-charismatic.
These were individuals that had not learned how to be charisma.
There were presidents like James Polk and Truman who were considered more neutral,
sort of in between non-charismatic and charismatic.
And then there were presidents, Jefferson, Jackson, Abraham Lincoln,
JFK, Kennedy, who were determined based on the speeches, editorials,
biographies and such, to be extremely charismatic.
The techniques, the verbals,
the non-verbals, everything that we've talked about as part of this course.
And what's interesting is they study the extent of which these presidents were
reelected and the data's actually pretty striking.
17% of the presidents who were deemed non-charismatic, only 17% were reelected.
66% of the neutral and 100% of the presidents who
were determined to be charismatic, either reelected or
unfortunately assassinated, which maybe assassination is a metric for
whether you have a vision that is one of change.
That may be some people like and others don't like.
But the importance here is really around the likelihood of getting reelected
as a US President is clearly predicted by how charismatic you ultimately are.
Maybe you'll be a president one day, maybe you won't.
Ultimately, at the end of the day, the degree at which you are charismatic will
shape whether you can clearly communicate an effective vision that compels people,
inspires people and motivates people to want to be part of your team.