Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Baryon
The name "baryon", introduced by Abraham Pais,[2] comes from the Greek word
for "heavy" (βαρύς, barýs), because, at the time of their naming, most known
elementary particles had lower masses than the baryons. Each baryon has a
corresponding antiparticle (antibaryon) where their corresponding antiquarks
replace quarks. For example, a proton is made of two up quarks and one down
quark; and its corresponding antiparticle, the antiproton, is made of two up
antiquarks and one down antiquark.
A census of the Universe's baryons indicates that 10% of them could be found
inside galaxies, 50 to 60% in the circumgalactic medium,[3] and the remaining
:
30 to 40% could be located in the warm–hot intergalactic medium (WHIM).[4]
Background
Baryons are strongly interacting fermions; that is, they are acted on by the
strong nuclear force and are described by Fermi–Dirac statistics, which apply to
all particles obeying the Pauli exclusion principle. This is in contrast to the
bosons, which do not obey the exclusion principle.
Baryons, along with mesons, are hadrons, particles composed of quarks. Quarks
have baryon numbers of B = 31 and antiquarks have baryon numbers of B = − 31 .
The term "baryon" usually refers to triquarks—baryons made of three quarks
(B = 31 + 31 + 31 = 1).
Baryonic matter
Experiments are consistent with the number of quarks in the universe being a
constant and, to be more specific, the number of baryons being a constant (if
antimatter is counted as negative); in technical language, the total baryon
number appears to be conserved. Within the prevailing Standard Model of
particle physics, the number of baryons may change in multiples of three due to
the action of sphalerons, although this is rare and has not been observed under
experiment. Some grand unified theories of particle physics also predict that a
single proton can decay, changing the baryon number by one; however, this has
not yet been observed under experiment. The excess of baryons over
antibaryons in the present universe is thought to be due to non-conservation of
baryon number in the very early universe, though this is not well understood.
Properties
Combinations of three u, d or s quarks forming baryons with a spin- 21 form the uds baryon
octet
This belief lasted until Murray Gell-Mann proposed the quark model in 1964
(containing originally only the u, d, and s quarks).[13] The success of the isospin
model is now understood to be the result of the similar masses of u and d
quarks. Since u and d quarks have similar masses, particles made of the same
number then also have similar masses. The exact specific u and d quark
2
composition determines the charge, as u quarks carry charge + 3 while d quarks
++
carry charge − 31 . For example, the four Deltas all have different charges (Δ
+ 0 −
(uuu), Δ (uud), Δ (udd), Δ (ddd)), but have similar masses (~1,232 MeV/c2) as
they are each made of a combination of three u or d quarks. Under the isospin
model, they were considered to be a single particle in different charged states.
The mathematics of isospin was modeled after that of spin. Isospin projections
varied in increments of 1 just like those of spin, and to each projection was
associated a "charged state". Since the "Delta particle" had four "charged
++ + 0
states", it was said to be of isospin I = 3
2 . Its "charged states" Δ , Δ , Δ , and
−
Δ , corresponded to the isospin projections I3 = + 3 1 1 3
2 , I3 = + 2 , I3 = − 2 , and I3 = − 2
:
, respectively. Another example is the "nucleon particle". As there were two
+
nucleon "charged states", it was said to be of isospin 21 . The positive nucleon N
0
(proton) was identified with I3 = + 21 and the neutral nucleon N (neutron) with
I3 = − 21 .[14] It was later noted that the isospin projections were related to the up
and down quark content of particles by the relation:
where the n's are the number of up and down quarks and antiquarks.
In the "isospin picture", the four Deltas and the two nucleons were thought to be
the different states of two particles. However, in the quark model, Deltas are
different states of nucleons (the N++ or N− are forbidden by Pauli's exclusion
principle). Isospin, although conveying an inaccurate picture of things, is still
used to classify baryons, leading to unnatural and often confusing
nomenclature.
It was noted that charge (Q) was related to the isospin projection (I3), the
baryon number (B) and flavour quantum numbers (S, C, B′, T) by the Gell-Mann–
Nishijima formula:[14]
:
Quarks are fermionic particles of spin 21 (S = 21 ). Because spin projections vary
in increments of 1 (that is 1 ħ), a single quark has a spin vector of length 21 , and
has two spin projections (Sz = + 21 and Sz = − 21 ). Two quarks can have their spins
aligned, in which case the two spin vectors add to make a vector of length S = 1
and three spin projections (Sz = +1, Sz = 0, and Sz = −1). If two quarks have
unaligned spins, the spin vectors add up to make a vector of length S = 0 and
has only one spin projection (Sz = 0), etc. Since baryons are made of three
quarks, their spin vectors can add to make a vector of length S = 3
2 , which has
four spin projections (Sz = + 3 1 1 3
2 , Sz = + 2 , Sz = − 2 , and Sz = − 2 ), or a vector of
length S = 21 with two spin projections (Sz = + 21 , and Sz = − 21 ).[15]
Parity
…
If the universe were reflected in a mirror, most of the laws of physics would be
identical—things would behave the same way regardless of what we call "left"
and what we call "right". This concept of mirror reflection is called "intrinsic
parity" or simply "parity" (P). Gravity, the electromagnetic force, and the strong
interaction all behave in the same way regardless of whether or not the universe
is reflected in a mirror, and thus are said to conserve parity (P-symmetry).
:
However, the weak interaction does distinguish "left" from "right", a
phenomenon called parity violation (P-violation).
Based on this, if the wavefunction for each particle (in more precise terms, the
quantum field for each particle type) were simultaneously mirror-reversed, then
the new set of wavefunctions would perfectly satisfy the laws of physics (apart
from the weak interaction). It turns out that this is not quite true: for the
equations to be satisfied, the wavefunctions of certain types of particles have to
be multiplied by −1, in addition to being mirror-reversed. Such particle types are
said to have negative or odd parity (P = −1, or alternatively P = –), while the
other particles are said to have positive or even parity (P = +1, or alternatively
P = +).
For baryons, the parity is related to the orbital angular momentum by the
relation:[18]
Nomenclature
Baryons are classified into groups according to their isospin (I) values and quark
(q) content. There are six groups of baryons: nucleon (N), Delta (Δ), Lambda (
Λ), Sigma (Ʃ), Xi (Ξ), and Omega (Ω). The rules for classification are defined by
the Particle Data Group. These rules consider the up (u), down (d) and strange (
s) quarks to be light and the charm (c), bottom (b), and top (t) quarks to be
heavy. The rules cover all the particles that can be made from three of each of
the six quarks, even though baryons made of top quarks are not expected to
exist because of the top quark's short lifetime. The rules do not cover
pentaquarks.[19]
Baryons that decay strongly have their masses as part of their names. For
example, Ʃ0 does not decay strongly, but Δ++(1232) does.
Quarks carry a charge, so knowing the charge of a particle indirectly gives the
quark content. For example, the rules above say that a Λ+
c contains a c quark
and some combination of two u and/or d quarks. The c quark has a charge of
2 2
(Q = + 3 ), therefore the other two must be a u quark (Q = + 3 ), and a d quark
(Q = − 31 ) to have the correct total charge (Q = +1).
See also
Eightfold way
List of baryons
Meson
Citations
4. J.-P. Macquart; et al. (2020). "A census of baryons in the Universe from localized
fast radio bursts". Vol. 581. Nature. pp. 391–395. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2300-2
(https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41586-020-2300-2) .
5. H. Muir (2003)
6. K. Carter (2003)
C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group) (2008). "Review of Particle Physics" (http://scip
p.ucsc.edu/%7Ehaber/pubs/Review_of_Particle_Physics_2014.pdf) (PDF). Physics
Letters B. 667 (1): 1–1340. Bibcode:2008PhLB..667....1A (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.ed
u/abs/2008PhLB..667....1A) . doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 (https://doi.org/10.1
016%2Fj.physletb.2008.07.018) . hdl:1854/LU-685594 (https://hdl.handle.net/1854
%2FLU-685594) . PMID 10020536 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10020536) .
Archived (https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://scipp.ucsc.edu/%7Ehaber
/pubs/Review_of_Particle_Physics_2014.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-
09.
W.-M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group) (2006). "Review of Particle Physics". Journal of
Physics G. 33 (1): 1–1232. arXiv:astro-ph/0601168 (https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/060
1168) . Bibcode:2006JPhG...33....1Y (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006JPhG...
33....1Y) . doi:10.1088/0954-3899/33/1/001 (https://doi.org/10.1088%2F0954-3899
%2F33%2F1%2F001) .
E. Wigner (1937). "On the Consequences of the Symmetry of the Nuclear Hamiltonian
on the Spectroscopy of Nuclei". Physical Review. 51 (2): 106–119.
Bibcode:1937PhRv...51..106W (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1937PhRv...51..106
W) . doi:10.1103/PhysRev.51.106 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRev.51.106) .
M. Gell-Mann (1964). "A Schematic of Baryons and Mesons". Physics Letters. 8 (3):
214–215. Bibcode:1964PhL.....8..214G (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964PhL.....
8..214G) . doi:10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0031-
9163%2864%2992001-3) .
W. Heisenberg (1932). "Über den Bau der Atomkerne I". Zeitschrift für Physik (in
German). 77 (1–2): 1–11. Bibcode:1932ZPhy...77....1H (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/a
bs/1932ZPhy...77....1H) . doi:10.1007/BF01342433 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF013
42433) . S2CID 186218053
(https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:186218053) .
W. Heisenberg (1932). "Über den Bau der Atomkerne II". Zeitschrift für Physik (in
German). 78 (3–4): 156–164. Bibcode:1932ZPhy...78..156H (https://ui.adsabs.harvard
.edu/abs/1932ZPhy...78..156H) . doi:10.1007/BF01337585 (https://doi.org/10.1007%
2FBF01337585) . S2CID 186221789 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1862
21789) .
W. Heisenberg (1932). "Über den Bau der Atomkerne III". Zeitschrift für Physik (in
German). 80 (9–10): 587–596. Bibcode:1933ZPhy...80..587H (https://ui.adsabs.harva
rd.edu/abs/1933ZPhy...80..587H) . doi:10.1007/BF01335696 (https://doi.org/10.1007
%2FBF01335696) . S2CID 126422047 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:12
6422047) .
External links