The document discusses investigating employee absences from work. For the first question, the author believes it is reasonable to investigate an employee if they are suspected of lying about an absence, such as claiming sick leave but actually going on a cruise. Private investigations should only be used in severe cases, not for a first offense. For the second question, the author suggests alternatives to surveillance for addressing excessive absenteeism, such as reviewing and tightening absence policies, requiring documentation for emergencies, limiting the number of allowed absence days, and notifying employees when paid time off is running low. These alternatives may help curb absenteeism without invasive monitoring.
The document discusses investigating employee absences from work. For the first question, the author believes it is reasonable to investigate an employee if they are suspected of lying about an absence, such as claiming sick leave but actually going on a cruise. Private investigations should only be used in severe cases, not for a first offense. For the second question, the author suggests alternatives to surveillance for addressing excessive absenteeism, such as reviewing and tightening absence policies, requiring documentation for emergencies, limiting the number of allowed absence days, and notifying employees when paid time off is running low. These alternatives may help curb absenteeism without invasive monitoring.
The document discusses investigating employee absences from work. For the first question, the author believes it is reasonable to investigate an employee if they are suspected of lying about an absence, such as claiming sick leave but actually going on a cruise. Private investigations should only be used in severe cases, not for a first offense. For the second question, the author suggests alternatives to surveillance for addressing excessive absenteeism, such as reviewing and tightening absence policies, requiring documentation for emergencies, limiting the number of allowed absence days, and notifying employees when paid time off is running low. These alternatives may help curb absenteeism without invasive monitoring.
1. if you had reason to believe someone was lying about an absence from work, do you think it be appropriate to investigate
-I feel it would be reasonable to investigate if I had grounds to believe
someone was lying about an absence from work. I wouldn't go so far as to hire a private investigator if this is the employee's first time doing something like this. That approach, in my opinion, should only be utilized in severe circumstances. However, based on what I've read, the employee was clearly not sick and is abusing sick time to go on a cruise. And, as previously said, investigations have been authorized, therefore there are no issues and it has been established that the employee was guilty of faking/abusing his/her sick leave.
2. If excessive absenteeism is a real problem in an organization, are there
alternatives to surveillance? If so, what are they, and do they have any limitations of their own?
- There are obviously alternatives to monitoring if frequent absence is a
serious concern. The first thing a firm should do, in my opinion, is review its policies. If their absenteeism policy is excessively liberal, they should implement more transparent processes and standards for obtaining days off. If an employee has an emergency that requires immediate attention, make them show documentation when they return to work. Have a predetermined amount of days off each year that employees are allowed to take (excluding vacation time). Give employees a heads-up when their vacation days are coming to an end so they know how much time they have left.