References

Boettcher, J. (2007). Ten core principles for designing effective learning environments:

Insights from brain research and pedagogical theory. Innovate: Journal of Online

Education, 3(3).

Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M. D., Butler, M., & Cho, S. (2014). Effects of

blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423-

437.

Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H. (2012). Using spacing

to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for

instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 369-378.

Codding, R. S., Volpe, R. J., Martin, R. J., & Krebs, G. (2019). Enhancing mathematics fluency:

Comparing the spacing of practice sessions with the number of opportunities to

respond.  School Psychology Review, 48(1), 88-97.

Hopkins, R. F., Lyle, K. B., Hieb, J. L., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2016). Spaced retrieval practice

increases college students' short- and long-term retention of mathematics

knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 853-873.

Li, N. (2016). Teaching ELLs across content areas: Issues and strategies. Information Age

Publishing.

McConnell, C., Conrad, B., Uhrmacher, P. B. (2020). Lesson planning with a purpose: Five

approaches to curriculum design. Teachers College Press.

Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2012). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural

education. Pearson Education.

Riccomini, P. J. & Witzel, B. S. (2010). Response to interventions in math, Thousand Oaks,

CA: Corwin.

Skinner, B. F. (1963). Operant behavior. The American Psychologist, 18(8), 503-515.

Vygotsky, L. S., Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., Souberman, E., & Wertsch, J. V.

(1979). L. S. vygotsky: Mind in society. the development of higher psychological

processes. University of Illinois Press.

Weisman, D. L. (2012). An Essay on the Art and Science of Teaching. The American Economist,

57(1), 111–125.
 Appendix

Throughout the lesson plans, the following theories and methods have been annotated using
subscripts.
The number 1 indicates behaviorism.
The number 2 indicates constructivism.
The number 3 indicates spaced practice.
The number 4 indicates concrete to representation to abstract (CRA).