Aristotle disagreed with Plato's idea of forms and instead believed that things with both matter and form are real. He developed the concept of hylemorphism where things are composed of both matter and form. Kant's deontological view was that nothing can be called simply good without qualification and his principles were based on epistemology rather than what is good in itself.
Aristotle disagreed with Plato's idea of forms and instead believed that things with both matter and form are real. He developed the concept of hylemorphism where things are composed of both matter and form. Kant's deontological view was that nothing can be called simply good without qualification and his principles were based on epistemology rather than what is good in itself.
Aristotle disagreed with Plato's idea of forms and instead believed that things with both matter and form are real. He developed the concept of hylemorphism where things are composed of both matter and form. Kant's deontological view was that nothing can be called simply good without qualification and his principles were based on epistemology rather than what is good in itself.