Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by
MASTER OF A P P L I E D SCIENCE
in
required standard
October, 1977
requirements f o r an a d v a n c e d d e g r e e a t t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f
s c h o l a r l y p u r p o s e s may be g r a n t e d by t h e Head o f my
D e p a r t m e n t o r by h i s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s . I t i s understood that
written permission.
Department o f M e c h a n i c a l E n g i n e e r i n g
The U n i v e r s i t y o f B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a
V a n c o u v e r , B.C.
Canada V6T 1W5
ii
ABSTRACT
An a p p r o a c h t o t h e d a t a r e d u c t i o n , so c r i t i c a l a t low
studied in depth.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Page
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 P r e l i m i n a r y Remarks 1
1.2 D r a g R e d u c t i o n Due t o L o n g - C h a i n
Polymers 2
2.2 D e s i g n o f Honeycomb f o r T u r b u l e n c e
Control 22
3. TEST PROCEDURES 38
3.1 Models • • • 39
3.2 P r e s s u r e Measurements 43
3.3 Flow V i s u a l i z a t i o n 54
Chapter Page
4.4 Drag C o e f f i c i e n t 89
4.5 S t r o u h a l Number . . . . . . . . . . 91
REFERENCES 117
L I S T OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Page
2-4. A p h o t o g r a p h o f the g l y c e r o l - w a t e r t u n n e l
c a p a b l e o f g e n e r a t i n g R e y n o l d s number i n
the range 1 - 1 8 , 0 0 0 : A, autotransformer;
D, d r i v e m o t o r ; E , h e a t e x c h a n g e r ; F , f l o w
d i s t r i b u t i n g vanes; H , p o r t h o l e s ; M, V e n t u r i
meter; P , pump; S, s c r e e n s and h o n e y -
comb; T , t e s t - s e c t i o n ; V , v e n t 24
Figure Page
2-9. A comparison o f v e l o c i t y p r o f i l e s at t h r e e
d i f f e r e n t s t a t i o n s i n t h e t e s t - s e c t i o n and
f o r two v a l u e s o f mean f l o w v e l o c i t y .
Note a l a r g e r e g i o n o f e s s e n t i a l l y u n i f o r m
flow which i s d e s i r a b l e f o r the p l a n n e d
t e s t programme . . 34
2- 10. R e p r e s e n t a t i v e p l o t s showing v a r i a t i o n o f
the t u r b u l e n c e i n t e n s i t y i n the t e s t -
section 36
3-3. A d i a g r a m showing c o n s t r u c t i o n a l d e t a i l s
o f a t y p i c a l p r e s s u r e measurement model . . 45
4-1. An i l l u s t r a t i o n showing p o s s i b l e e r r o r s
i n t r o d u c e d by n o n - u n i f o r m i t y o f t h e
velocity profile 66
4-2. R e p r e s e n t a t i v e p r e s s u r e p l o t s comparing
p r e s e n t r e s u l t s w i t h t h o s e by Grove
et a l . 3 4
a low R e y n o l d s number o f 175.
t a
Note a r e l a t i v e s e n s i t i v i t y o f t h e p r o p o s e d
p r e s s u r e c o e f f i c i e n t to d i f f e r e n c e s i n
test conditions 70
4-4. S u r f a c e p r e s s u r e d i s t r i b u t i o n as a f f e c t e d
by the R e y n o l d s number f o r a g i v e n b l o c k -
age r a t i o :
a) S / C = 2% ;
b) S / C = 3 . 3 % ;
c) S / C = 6.61 ;
d) S / C = 1 2 . 5 % ;
e) S / C = 25% ;
f) S / C = 501 . 73
4-5. P r e s s u r e p l o t s as a f f e c t e d by b l o c k a g e at
a g i v e n R e y n o l d s number:
a) R == 3000;
n
b) R == 1200;
n
c) R == 400;
• n
d) R == 200;
n
e) R == 30 ,
n
4-6. E f f e c t o f w a l l c o n f i n e m e n t on t h e minimum
and b a s e p r e s s u r e s , 10 < R < 1 8 , 0 0 0 : n
a) minimum p r e s s u r e ; 87
b) base p r e s s u r e ...... 88
Figure . ' P a g e
4-8. V a r i a t i o n o f t h e S t r o u h a l number w i t h
b l o c k a g e a t the l o w e r end o f the R e y n o l d s
number r a n g e (R < 1000) 93
4-11. A t y p i c a l p h o t o g r a p h showing f o r m a t i o n o f
Foppl v o r t i c e s behind a two-dimensional
c y l i n d e r ; R = 186, S / C = 50%
n
9 8
4-12. A f l o w v i s u a l i z a t i o n s t u d y showing
d e v e l o p m e n t and i n s t a b i l i t y o f v o r t e x ring
w i t h R e y n o l d s number ( S / C = 15%):
a) R = 4; b) R = 10; c) R = 17;
J
n ' J
n ' J
n '
d) R = 21; e) R = 31; f) R =42;
• n J
n J
n '
g) R = 56 ; h) R = 60 . 9 9
& J
n ' J
n
4-13. A p h o t o g r a p h o f the c l a s s i c a l Karman
v o r t e x s t r e e t ; R = 6 0 , S / C = 15%
n 103
4-14. P o s i t i o n o f s e p a r a t i o n as a f f e c t e d by the
R e y n o l d s number .and w a l l c o n f i n e m e n t :
a) f l o w v i s u a l i z a t i o n d a t a ; 104
b) b a s e d on s u r f a c e p r e s s u r e p l o t s
( F i g u r e 4-4) 105
4-15. E f f e c t o f b l o c k a g e on e v o l u t i o n o f the
wake a t a f i x e d R e y n o l d s number o f 100:
a) S / C = 25% ;
b) S / C = 50% 107
L I S T OF TABLES
Table
Page
programme, c o r r e s p o n d i n g b l o c k a g e
and a s s o c i a t e d R e y n o l d s number r a n g e
a t t a i n e d t h r o u g h the v a r i a t i o n o f
mean f r e e s t r e a m v e l o c i t y and
c o n c e n t r a t i o n of the working f l u i d
xi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
invaluable.
overheat ratio
D /(l/2)pU D
p
2
(P 0 - P )/(P
r 0 - P ) r
(P e - P )/(l/2)pU
r
2
mean f l u c t u a t i n g p r e s s u r e coefficient
honeycomb c e l l - s i z e •
cylinder diameter
I length of honeycomb
base pressure
P m minimum p r e s s u r e
P r s t a t i c p r e s s u r e at r e f e r e n c e tap, in the
p r e s e a t c a s e r = 50
P Q s t a t i c p r e s s u r e on c y l i n d e r s u r f a c e at angle 9
from f r o n t s t a g n a t i o n p o i n t
R n R e y n o l d s number, U D / v
R , c r i t i c a l R e y n o l d s number c o r r e s p o n d i n g to
onset of v o r t e x shedding
S n Strouhal number, f D / U
•T temperature of solution
average v e l o c i t y i n t e s t - s e c t i o n based on
f l o w r a t e as g i v e n by o r i f i c e m e t e r
characteristic velocity as p r o p o s e d by
Grove e t al.*^
angular l o c a t i o n of p r e s s u r e tap w i t h
r e f e r e n c e to f r o n t s t a g n a t i o n p o i n t
angular l o c a t i o n of s e p a r a t i n g shear l a y e r
w i t h r e s p e c t to r e a r s t a g n a t i o n p o i n t
e r r o r i n p r e s s u r e at 8=6 due t o n o n u n i f o r m i t y
of v e l o c i t y p r o f i l e
e r r o r i n p r e s s u r e at 0 due t o n o n u n i f o r m i t y
of v e l o c i t y p r o f i l e
kinematic v i s c o s i t y of water
iii) c o n v e n t i o n a l f l u i d dynamic i n s t r u m e n t s l i k e p i t o t
t u b e , v e n t u r i m e t e r , hot f i l m p r o b e s , e t c . show
anomalous b e h a v i o u r ~ 7 . D
described as follows:
HYPOTHESES EXPLAINING DRAG REDUCTION
/
TURBULENCE WALL LAYER
.SUPPRESSION MODIFICATION
HYPOTH ESES HYPOTHESES
mobile w a l l layer.
example by G a d d 8
(1971), Landahl 9
(1972), Hoyt 1 0
(1972) and
that <5 < L then eddies i n the region L-6 will be damped
A r u n a c h a l a m et al. X J
(1972) showed a t h i c k e r w a l l layer for
the drag reducing solution than that for the solvent alone. They
18
papers. Gadd (1966) was the first one to study the effect
20
However, it was only towards the later part of the last century
been r e v i e w e d r a t h e r a d e q u a t e l y by s e v e r a l a u t h o r s i n c l u d i n g
22 23 20' 24 25
Rosenhead , Wille , Marris , Morkovin , Parkinson and
26
Cermak . The c o l l e c t e d literature suggests that, in general,
10
to the present thesis. In the range R < 175 only two contri-
3 n
10 10 10 10 10 10
40 10 22
S/C ., WAKE GEOMETRY 4 ROSENHEAD [1930]
1.7X10 2.IX 10
27
F A G E & F A L K N E R [1931]
2X10* 7X10' 28
FLACHSBART [1932]
2.5X10 29
LI NKEet a l . [1932]
3.5 175
30
C p , S/C ( 1.1 - 7.6 % )
5 5 THOM [1933]
10 2.1X10
|c ,c p F 31
4
40 10
WAKE GEOMETRY
G I E DT [1951]
0-1 2X10' 32
WAKE GEOMETRY
ROSHKO [1953]
40 175
IC 33
6X 10 5X10 TANEDA [1955]
C
P' F' D' S
C C 9
34
G R O V E e t a l . [1963]
10 1.2X10"
35
c . c , S/C
p
ACHE NBACH [1968]
2.2X10 36
E L - S H E R B I N Y [1972]
5 5 37
Figure 1-2. A summary o f l i t e r a t u r e i n d i c a t i n g the 4X10 5X10 F A R E L L et a l . [ 1 9 7 6 ]
scope of r e c e n t important contributions
i n the f i e l d of flow p a s t a c i r c u l a r 38
0-23 2.6 cylinder. F A R E L L e t a l . [1977]
39
H U N E R e t a l . [1977]
12
of the tunnel.
* Glycerol-water solution
tunnel
* Venturimeter
I
* Hot-film anemometer Reynolds Number Effect Blockage Effect
(calibration)
1 I
* Location of separating
shear layer
Figure 1-3. A schematic d i a g r a m showing the plan * Approximate evaluation
of study. of the Strouhal number
15
of uniform flow. .
2 .1 Liquid Tunnel
(i) The t u n n e l s h o u l d be c a p a b l e o f p r o d u c i n g
a maximum v e l o c i t y o f a r o u n d 30 cm/s l e a d i n g
t o R e y n o l d s numbers i n t h e r a n g e 1 - 2 0 , 0 0 0 b a s e d
on t h e c y l i n d e r d i a m e t e r .
(ii) The t u n n e l t e s t - s e c t i o n s h o u l d be l a r g e
enough t o p e r m i t wake and b l o c k a g e . s t u d i e s .
(iv) The v e l o c i t y p r o f i l e s h o u l d be s u f f i c i e n t l y
f l a t to permit uniform flow s t u d i e s . The
t u r b u l e n t i n t e n s i t y s h o u l d be l e s s t h a n 2%.
(v) The t e s t - s e c t i o n s h o u l d be p r o v i d e d w i t h a
s i m p l e model s u p p o r t s y s t e m . When mounted
i n t h e t e s t - s e c t i o n , a model s h o u l d be
readily accessible.
(vi) T h e r e s h o u l d be a p r o v i s i o n f o r i n t r o d u c i n g
p r e s s u r e , v e l o c i t y and o t h e r m e a s u r i n g
instrumentation.
(24 in. x 6 in.). Both the front and t h e rear walls are
mount model 3V/6, 9.6 l/s (160 gpm), 9.4 m head, 1750 rpm.
U,cm/s
VP, P s i
autotransformer and r e c t i f i e d by s e l e n i u m d i o d e s . No
It was' i m p o r t a n t t o m i n i m i z e d i r t contamination of
assembly.
2.2 D e s i g n o f Honeycomb f o r T u r b u l e n c e C o n t r o l
t o
25
i
10 , 4
and R,. = 4 . 76 x 1 0 2
where:
cl
L = length scale;
d = cell diameter;
R ^ , R ^ = R e y n o l d s numbers b a s e d on c e l l
d i a m e t e r and l e n g t h , respectively.
u /U
2 2
=
x/d
27
of the flume (1.52 m), that the output signal from the probe
300
• /
/
/ •
250
2 2
V .volt
200 Probe:TSI 1 2 3 9 W
/• R c - 7-2 n
R 0 = 7 - 9 A
a = 1-097
T - 2 0 °C
v
A
/
/
A 50
,1/2 d
• 1/2
U , (cm/s)
+ 30 •
• •
• •
•
•
• •
o H
• •
- 15 H
•
• •
• •
-30 -I
10 20 U , c m / s
Y, c m
x =•3 0
« 9 0
• 1 3 0
•B4
U =7 c m / s '"•11.9 cm/s
• "4*
5 1 0 U , c m / s
gure 2-9. A c o m p a r i s o n ' o f v e l o c i t y p r o f i l e s at three
d i f f e r e n t s t a t i o n s i n the t e s t - s e c t i o n and for
two v a l u e s of- mean flow v e l o c i t y . Note a
l a r g e r e g i o n of e s s e n t i a l l y u n i f o r m flow
w h i c h i s d e s i r a b l e f o r the p l a n n e d t e s t
programme'.
35
Y,cm
(a) ( b ) •(c)
3 0 -
o
o U = "11 • 9 cm/s n
U - 7 cm/s > U= 7 cm/s
ox
n
X ; 9 0 c m > x -13 0 c m
= 9 0c m
15 -
0-1
o • 0
>
•
a
-15-
o
o
o
o
- 3 0 -
I i i i
0 2 4 0 2 4 0 2 4
u/u A
Figure 2-10. R e p r e s e n t a t i v e p l o t s showing v a r i a t i o n o f
the t u r b u l e n c e i n t e n s i t y i n t h e test-section,
37
chapter.
3. TEST PROCEDURES
3.1 Models
\ C , °"o
S/C
NO. . 0 (v/v = 1) 41 (v/v = 4) 66 (v/v = 15) 76 (v/v = 40)
% w w w w
D ,cm
5 12. 5 7.6 4500 - 11000 3000 - 11000 250 - 1100 120 - 250
typical model.
End sleeve
End sleeve
transducer.
temperature transients.
47
Power
input
Stationary Diaphragm
c a p c i t o r plates
A point c o n c e r n i n g an a p p r o p r i a t e c h o i c e of the
minutes.
To i n s u r e a c c u r a c y as w e l l as repeatability of the
L e t t h e o b j e c t i v e be t o measure a differential
pressure P - P , where P r e p r e s e n t s p r e s s u r e on t h e sur-
a r a
AP + 6 + 6
a 1 2
2 2
= AP + 6
r 1
Hence,
51
<*fV^^—
(Ap ), r
< r'3
Ap
h ? " i 05
3 1 |
Drift
\1 Vb< I! '
1
!I
| — T *j j
Ti T 2 T 3 T 4 T 5
S
2 " «3
i.e. ,
(AP ) + (AP )
(AP ) a 2 ^ I_i.= P a - P r . (3.1)
(AP ) + (AP )
P u - P =• ( A P , ) , - r 5
^—i •
b r b '4
4 6 47
ss/sssj?sssssssssss/ssssssssss\
r
d.c. d i g i t a l
voltmeter
u- v.
osci Hoscope recorder filter
1i
3.3. Flow V i s u a l i z a t i o n
Figure 3-9.
Karman v o r t e x street.
form w o u l d be as C p = (P Q - P ) / ( p U /2)
r where P r corres-
Figure 4-1. An i l l u s t r a t i o n s h o w i n g p o s s i b l e e r r o r s
i n t r o d u c e d by n o n - u n i f o r m i t y o f t h e
velocity profile
c = CP e + e )
9 - (P r + S )
5
P. - P
0 r j 1
1 +
(e 0 " e )/(P - -
r 0 P )
r
Note that e Q - and - are likely to be v e r y small.
ferentials. Therefore,
£ - £ F - £
= 19 _x_ , = ^0 ^r
e
9r P - P
a n d e
0r P - P
O r O r
N N
term
1 + £
9r _o r
and
1 + £
Or 0 r
P - P
0 50°
C
P P - P
0 50°
1
A question may a r i s e as to the possible difficulty
gated here.
1.0
0.8 -1-5 *
R
n -175
34 S/C
0.6 -1.0\ A G R O V E etal 10 %
\
12.5%
1
C. • PRESENT
0.4 L05
0.2 0
0 U -0.5
c
p ,Grove etal
• •
0-2 U - 1 0
- 04 L-1-5
-0.6
0 30 .6 0 90 120 150 180
e
1.0 .1-0
36 - H 3
0.6 -0
C
P
0.4 -0-5
0.2 L -10
Cp , El-Sherbiny
0 _1.5
A *
0-2 --2.0 A •
AV
0.4
0 30 60 90 120 150
Figure 4-3. A c o m p a r i s o n o f p r e s e n t r e s u l t s w i t h t h o s e by E l - S h e r b i n y
a t a r e l a t i v e l y h i g h R e y n o l d s number o f 15 x 10^.
,72
1-0
R
n= 18 •
0.6 34 o
160 A
400 A
0.4 720 •
1200 *
1560 o
0.2
C.
0 A
Km*- O
- 0.2 • • • A
o
A
\ A A A
J3'
0-4 a \
^ °
o
\ o o o
a-
0.8
-1.0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
0°
Figure 4-4 S u r f a c e p r e s s u r e d i s t r i b u t i o n as a f f e c t e d by the Reynolds
number f o r a g i v e n b l o c k a g e ratio:
a) S / C = 21.
74
1.0
S/C 3.3'%CD= 2 cm]
=
0.8 R =n 30
55 .
300 •
0.6 12 00 •
3000 <
0.4
T
0.2
c p 0
-0.2
- 0-4
- 0-6 D n D •
-08
-1.0
0 30 60 90 120 150
o
0
Figure 4-4 S u r f a c e p r e s s u r e d i s t r i b u t i o n as a f f e c t e d by t h e Reynolds
number f o r a g i v e n b l o c k a g e ratio:
b) S/C =3.3%.
75
to
S/C= 6.6% CD = 4cm]
0-8 R: 60 D
n 80 O
130 A
600 •
0-6 <
120 0
3000
6000
0-4
c
0-2
0
l «1 2 i f
e < •
A A
A D
-0-2 A O
a
o O
O •
A
8 A A
•0-4 O A
° o
A
o
O •
^ oo •
• D
• •a
-0-6
-0-8
0 30 60 90 120 150
0
10
230 o
120 0 o
0-6 3000
61 50
11000
0-4
0- 2 a
c 0
p u
o o o o
-0-2 ®• . J o o o
D a
n °
OoO°
•
-0-4 •
• • •
- 0-6
-0-8
-1.0
30 60 90 120 150 1 8 0
1-0
S/C= 25 % [ D=15 cm J
0-8 R = 190
0
360
800 V
0-6 120 0 o
2000 o
3000
0.4 5000
C p 0.2
6
O o o
-0-2
4* O
o
o
• 8~o<>
0 o v
V
-0-4
V v
-0-6 D
-0-8 O n
a
30 60 90 1 20 1 50
e
1.0
3000 o
18000 o
0-2
C 0
P
0.2
- 0,4
A
A
- 0-6
• T
0-8
- 1.0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
6°
(Figure 4-4a).
1.0
R =3000
n
.0,8 S/C % 3.3 .
6.6 o
0-6 12.5 A
25 •
50 .
04
0.2
C
0
•o 2 2
• o• • A
A
• •
•o
0.2 o• o •
aa a
o • •
• D
a o
.0.4
-0-6
-0-8
- 1-0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
0°
Figure 4-5. Pressure plots as a f f e c t e d by b l o c k a g e at a given Reynolds
number: a) R = 3000.
. n
82
1-0
R p z1200
0.8 S/C % , 3.3
•
6.6 o
12.5
0-6
25
50
0-4
c
0.2
0 <5
o •
• o
• •o •
rt
V
• O * v
.0-2 '* A *
•V •O° A
• •
V V
-0-4 • •
.0-6 a •
0-8
-1.0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
9°
to
0.8 R = 400
S/cL 2 .
0-6 3.3 o
C. 12.5 -
'P
0-4 25 D
50 T
0-2
0
• o o o
• o
• o
• 9 • o •
o •
0-2
- 0-4 •
•
•
•
0-6
P •
0.8
1-0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
0°
i-o
R .-200
n
• S/C; 2
0-8 T
°/o T
12.5 °/o a
25 I. •
0-6
0-4
0-2
C
0 •
•
r
D
•
•
•
r •
a •
- 0-2 T
• •
n • • •
-0-4
0.6
0.8 • -
1-0
0 30 60 90 o 12 0 150 180
6
1.0,
0.8 R
n=30
S/C = 2 /
Q
0.6 3-3 °/ 0 r
0.4
C
0.2
- 0.2
T
-0.4
-0.6 T
• T T •
•
-0.8
-1-0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
e
49
0-4
0-6
0.8
10 10' 10 v
10 R
n CO
Figure 4-6 E f f e c t o f w a l l confinement on t h e minimum and base p r e s s u r e s ' , 10 < R < 18,000
a) minimum p r e s s u r e . . n
c I S/C7 0
P b
r . 92
• _Dennisand C h a n g 5 0
o 3-3
0 A
6-6
• 125
O A A A A
•
25 D A A
•
• 50
0-2
A
•
0-4
0-6
0-8
10 10 2
io 3
io 4
R n
range of 6 x 10 4
- 5 x 10^ by A c h e n b a c h * ^ and the low Reynolds
•
A
I I I I I I I I I
10 10' 10 v
10
R
n
Figure 4-7. Variation of the pressure drag coefficient with Reynolds number and blockage.
91
results by D e n n i s and C h a n g J U
, for < 100, compare favor-
by Rosenhead^ . 4
4.5 S t r o u h a l Number
Reynolds number, 1 0 4
< R < R . Attempts have been made'
J
' - n .- n,cr ' r
* = fh
b
U
s '
0-3
'n
0-2 • A
A A*
0-1
A •
0 J L I J I L». J- I I
20 100 1000
R
n
number f o r 10 J
< R '5 1 0 H
(Figure 4-9).
Figure 4 - 9.
To p r o v i d e b e t t e r a p p r e c i a t i o n as w e l l as substantiation
of the c e r t a i n b e h a v i o u r e x h i b i t e d by t h e measured d a t a , it
'n
S/C°A
" 5
)
• 15 / Present
• 25
0.3
35.5 %
32
Roshko ..---26.5 ? Q
14.8 %
0.2
S/C = 4-5 \
59 Modi and £ 8
0.1
10 10 10" R 10 V
to
n on
Figure 4-9 A c o m p a r i s o n o f measured S t r o u h a l d a t a w i t h t h o s e by o t h e r investigators
300 n R n .cr.
Flow visualization
100 -
0
10 20 30 40 50
S/C %
= 42;
n
(g)
u m b
R
e r
=
( S / C
6;
= 15%): (e) R
(h) R ^ ' = 6 0 N
= 31-
n R 5
101
4-12(h).
vorticity is diffused from the sheet into the main body o f the
(Figure 4-13).
50
10 10' 1Cf 1CT
R
n
Figure 4-14. Position o£ separation as affected by t h e R e y n o l d s number and w a l l confinement
•u ^ 1 ^„J 1 _ J. _ /" ^
106
blockage of 25%.
by T a n e d a and n u m e r i c a l v a l u e s as o b t a i n e d by D e n n i s and
s/c %
o 5
T 15
25
•
50
R
n
100 200 300
Figure 4-17 Dependence of vortex length on the R e y n o l d s number and b l o c k a g e
4.7 C l o s i n g Comments
are l i k e l y to be p r o f i t a b l e .
4.7.1 C o n c l u d i n g remarks
Pn - P
C = J 1
P
p r o m i s e s t o p r o m o t e r e p e a t a b i l i t y and c o m p a r i s o n o f data
measuring system.
112
in the blockage.
an i n c r e a s e in blockage.
blockage) s h o u l d be u n d e r t a k e n t o p r o v i d e a comprehensive
using:
solution c a n be handled.
of the R e y n o l d s number r a n g e .
to date.
REFERENCES
pp. 102-118.
R . a n d M. , N o . 1369, 1933.
121
pp. 134-138.
May 1976.
pp. 649-650. •
47-80, 230-232.
1949.
APPENDIX-I
stagnation streamline y = 0 c a n be w r i t t e n as
3u 1 3P , r 3 u
2
, 3 u,2
U TT- ~ — — "TT— + V [ T + o]
3x p 3x .2 2
3x 3y-
u
3u ,
-r—dx
= - —
p
. — dx + v
3x
[ n
. 2
+ —sH
2 J
dx
,
3x • ' -co J-co a x 3y
J —CO J
2
u
CO
2
127
u 2 2
9 u . 9 u, ,
+ + V r
[—j +
—2"^
3x* 3y
0 00
3 U ,3 U ,
1 + r n
rd U , 3 U, ,
+ L—o + — t - J dx
3x' •3y
2 2
3 u > > 3 u
3x* 3y
3u 3v
at x = 0
3x 3y
0 °o
= 1 - 3u
1/2 P ^ 1/2 u f 3 x
= 1 +
i +
x = 6
y = 0
Grove et a l . 3 4
have shown, independently, the value of A
to be 8. Thus,
P - P
0 °° _ , . 8 .
— _[_ -\- — -J- • • • •
1/2 p U 2 R
i.e.,
P
- P
50° = ( P
0- 50^ P
~ +
• • " ) l / 2 PU 2
Now
p
e- < «,- 5tf>
p p = p
e- { ( p
o- 5op o )
- ( 1 +
l ---*
+ ) 1 / 2 p U
c» }
>
p
e p
» _ r
e "5 0° '<d r
5(f ± „ j ±
2" ~ 2 ~ 2 R
1/2 p Vt 1/2 p u: 1/2 p ui
reduces to
P
6 - P
~ =
( P
8- 5(^-< 0- 5^
P P P
+ x
V2 p l£ 1/2 p uj