The document discusses various technologies for providing wireless backhaul connectivity to support public safety networks with mobile base stations, including point-to-point radio links, satellite backhaul, WiFi, and proposed LTE-based solutions using mobile user equipment and extended network nodes. It notes that while point-to-point radio and satellite backhaul can provide high performance, they require line-of-sight connections and expensive equipment unsuitable for mobile scenarios. WiFi solutions could work if protocols allow efficient dynamic meshing, but dedicated equipment is needed and WiFi operates on unlicensed bands with more interference. The proposed LTE-based extensions for mobile base stations are presented as a promising approach to enable voice and data services in moving cell networks
The document discusses various technologies for providing wireless backhaul connectivity to support public safety networks with mobile base stations, including point-to-point radio links, satellite backhaul, WiFi, and proposed LTE-based solutions using mobile user equipment and extended network nodes. It notes that while point-to-point radio and satellite backhaul can provide high performance, they require line-of-sight connections and expensive equipment unsuitable for mobile scenarios. WiFi solutions could work if protocols allow efficient dynamic meshing, but dedicated equipment is needed and WiFi operates on unlicensed bands with more interference. The proposed LTE-based extensions for mobile base stations are presented as a promising approach to enable voice and data services in moving cell networks
The document discusses various technologies for providing wireless backhaul connectivity to support public safety networks with mobile base stations, including point-to-point radio links, satellite backhaul, WiFi, and proposed LTE-based solutions using mobile user equipment and extended network nodes. It notes that while point-to-point radio and satellite backhaul can provide high performance, they require line-of-sight connections and expensive equipment unsuitable for mobile scenarios. WiFi solutions could work if protocols allow efficient dynamic meshing, but dedicated equipment is needed and WiFi operates on unlicensed bands with more interference. The proposed LTE-based extensions for mobile base stations are presented as a promising approach to enable voice and data services in moving cell networks
Romain Favraud, ... Thanasis Korakis, in Wireless Public
Safety Networks 2, 2016 4.7 Discussion Some research papers provide insight into full solutions when no backhaul is available, providing inter-eNB connectivity because of WiFi links and including D2D communications that were not yet defined by the ProSe specifications of 3GPP studies [GOM 14]. Other technologies are usually used to establish wireless backhaul supporting fixed LTE networks: PTP RF or free space optics links and PTMP RF links. In the case of portable BS, satellite backhaul links are sometimes used. However, it can be easily seen that these wireless solutions are not adequate for the establishment of a network of BS enabling voice and data communications in moving cell scenarios. For instance, Table 4.4 shows the main differentiating criteria. Despite great performance, PTP and PTMP solutions often require line-of-sight wireless connectivity with careful network planning, which make them inapplicable to the moving cell scenarios. Satellite backhauling, on the other hand, provides the best possible coverage but needs dedicated tracking antennas and suffers from high cost. More importantly, it has high latency (≥200 ms) that limits voice and data services [CAS 15]. WiFi solutions using omni-directional antennas are promising solutions if the higher layers and protocols allow for efficient and dynamic meshing, similar to the proposed LTE-based solutions (i.e. eUE and e2NB). However, dedicated equipment and antennas are needed for WiFi backhauling, thus increasing the cost of BS. In addition, commodity WiFi works on ISM bands and can thus experience a large interference compared to the licensed bands used for LTE. To solve this problem, some countries define their own licensed bands for the PS WiFi. Last but not least, studies on commercial networks have shown that the WiFi latency is on average slightly higher and has more jitter than that of LTE, although results might differ for PS networks [HUA 12] and other studies have shown that the WiFi latency is higher than that of LTE, especially when the traffic load and number of users increase [HUA 13]. Moreover, carrier aggregation and full duplex communications are expected to greatly increase LTE global throughput in such mesh topologies, although similar techniques could be used for WiFi. Table 4.4. Main characteristics of base stations’ backhauling solutions
BS PT(M)P/FSO SAT WiFi eUEs e2NBs
backhauling Frequency ISM or Licensed ISM, Licensed Licensed band licensed possibly licensed Link Very low High Low medium Low Low latency medium BS PT(M)P/FSO SAT WiFi eUEs e2NBs backhauling BS mobility No If tracking If omni- Yes Yes antenna antennas Cost +++ ++++ ++ ++ + Topology Star/mesh Star Star/mesh Mesh Mesh