You are on page 1of 16

Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

with an interest in Greek religion or choral poetry will have the city of Rome.” As a whole, the volume emphasizes this
to consult this study. Its richness lies in its cumulative detail local perspective and is structured accordingly in six parts:
and its bringing together of literary, historical, anthropologi- “Changes,” “Media,” “Symbols and Practices,” “Actors and
cal, and archeological evidence to contextualize the dynam- Actions,” “Different Religious Identities,” and “Roman Reli-
ics of cultic performance throughout the Greek world. gion Outside and Seen from Outside.” Each essay concludes
Jenny Strauss Clay with a brief discussion of further reading for those interested
University of Virginia in pursuing a particular aspect of Roman religion. This dense,
erudite tome will undoubtedly prove to be a significant con-
THE ROMAN SELF IN LATE ANTIQUITY: PRUDEN- tribution to the study of Roman religion for years to come.
TIUS AND THE POETICS OF THE SOUL. By Marc Matthew R. Hauge
Mastrangelo. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Claremont Graduate University
Press, 2008. Pp. xii + 259. $65.00.
Prudentius, a Roman Christian writer and poet (308-ca. ROMAN RELIGION. By Valerie M. Warrior. Cambridge
405), was certainly influenced by Christian writers such as
Introduction to Roman Civilization. New York: Cambridge
St. Ambrose and Tertullian. Mastrangelo does not disagree
University Press, 2006. Pp. vii + 165. $19.99.
with this generally accepted view, but he argues that pagan
The Cambridge Introduction to Roman Civilization is a
writers influenced Prudentius just as strongly. Nowhere is
series designed for students with no background in Roman
this more evident than in Psychomachia. In that work,
antiquity, focusing on key topics and primary texts closely
Prudentius systematically reworks Aeneid 6 in order to
linked to the Cambridge Latin Course. Warrior has written a
transform Vergil’s grand narrative of the Greco-Roman liter-
brief treatment of traditional Roman religion with this in
ary tradition into a “ ‘meta-narrative’ of Roman Christian
mind, arranging the survey around the following chapters:
identity in all its cultural, ideological, and intellectual
“The Gods and their Worship,” “Divination, Prayer, and
expression” (ch. 1). With this thesis, Mastrangelo lays the
Sacrifice,” “Religion and the Family,” “Religion and the
foundation of his larger argument. In subsequent chapters,
State,” “Religion and War,” “The Calendar, Festivals, and
he shows that Prudentius used contemporary poets, as well
Games,” “Official Attitudes toward Foreign Cults,” “Magic
as biblical, Platonist, Epicurean, and patristic writings to
and the Occult,” “Becoming a God,” and “The Jews and Chris-
weave an ingenious intertextual structure. Basically, Pru-
tianity.” At times, the discussion can be uneven and dis-
dentius’ reader is encouraged to identify with a new literary
jointed, but the generous use of primary texts, illustrations,
hero who is encouraged to convert to Christianity, and thus
and maps is commendable.
to the way of virtue, in order to help build the new identity of
Matthew R. Hauge
a “Christian Rome.” Prudentius wrote at a crucial time in the
Claremont Graduate University
history of the West, and he has not been given enough credit
for his synthesis that allowed “radical” Christian traditions
to blend with imperial Roman (and pagan) ones to produce a
Christian Origins
new identity for the Greco-Roman-Christian self. Not only
was Prudentius himself more important than has been THE BIBLICAL CANON: ITS ORIGIN, TRANSMIS-
generally believed, but his work shows that poetry perhaps SION, AND AUTHORITY. By Lee Martin McDonald.
played a more important role than did patristic prose in Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2007; 3rd corrected printing,
developing a Christian Roman identity during the fourth March 2008. Pp. xlii + 549. $29.95.
century. A provocative and important work that every histo- In this expanded (from 340 to 549 pages) third edition
rian and literary critic of Late Antiquity will need to engage. (formerly The Formation of the Christian Biblical Canon),
Fred W. Burnett McDonald updates and develops his basic theses: e.g., while
Anderson University for some Jews the canon was “largely settled” at the end of
the first century CE, it was not settled for most until the
A COMPANION TO ROMAN RELIGION. Edited by third-fourth c.; Christianity did not inherit a closed canon
Jörg Rüpke. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2007. from Judaism; Jesus did not leave his followers either the
Pp. vii + 542. $185.95. idea of a “closed canon” or a listing of books belonging to it;
As C. R. Phillips points out in his essay, “Approaching for most of Christendom, the process of forming a second
Roman Religion: The Case for Wissenschaftsgeschichte,” a testament was not completed until the fourth-fifth c. CE. In
comprehensive history of Roman religion does not exist. This general, the new edition presents a stronger case for these
ambitious volume seeks to fill this void, drawing from a broad views than the previous one. Regrettably, however—apart
range of traditions of research, including Northern and South- from nonsense statements inflicted upon the author by an
ern America, Italy, Greece, Britain, France, Germany, and editor, some of which were silently corrected in the third
Switzerland. In the opening essay, “Roman Religion— printing (cf. pp. 39-40, 80, 170)—it also perpetuates misin-
Religions of Rome,” Rüpke defines Roman religion as an formation: e.g., the confusion of a Latin canon list found in
abbreviation for “religious signs, practices, and traditions in Codex Claromontanus with the manuscript itself; the mis-

290
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

construal of Melito’s comments about the canon (claiming it JEWISH BELIEVERS IN JESUS: THE EARLY CENTU-
reflects the MT, e.g., when the order and titles of the books RIES. Edited by Oskar Skarsaune and Reidar Hvalvik.
are Septuagintal); the attribution of the colophon at the end Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2006. Pp. xxx + 930. $49.95.
of the Nag Hammadi copy of the Gospel of Thomas to the The twenty-three chapters in this book explore all of the
author (proposing that it could be “the first known document fundamental questions about Jewish followers of Jesus: How
called a gospel”); confusing and/or misleading summaries of does one define a “Jewish Christian”? What were the inter-
the work of earlier scholars. In short, the new edition has actions between Jewish and non-Jewish followers of Jesus in
substantial strengths in general but too often is unreliable antiquity? How numerous were Jewish followers of Jesus?
with regard to detail. And many more. The emphasis of the book is upon analyzing
Michael W. Holmes texts from the first five centuries of Christianity, texts that
Bethel University were believed to have been produced by persons and groups
that were ethnically Jewish but who confessed Jesus as the
DAS GESETZ IM FRÜHEN JUDENTUM UND IM Messiah. Of course, NT texts are presented, but also OT
NEUEN TESTAMENT: FESTSCHRIFT FÜR CHRIS- pseudepigraphal writings that were edited by Jewish Chris-
TOPH BURCHARD ZUM 75. GEBURTSTAG. Edited by tians, the Pseudo-Clementine writings, quotations of Jewish
Dieter Sänger and Matthias Konradt. Novum Testamentum Christian fragments and sources in the Greek, Latin, and
et Orbis Antiquus/Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testa- Syriac Church Fathers, texts of “church orders” and liturgy
ments, 57. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006. (such as the Didache and The Apostolic Constitutions), and
Pp. 344. €99.00. Jewish Christians as presented in rabbinic literature. Jewish
J. Becker opens this disparate collection of seventeen Christian groups are also presented (such as the Ebionites
essays with a study of the relationship of the temple of God and the Nazoreans), as well as individuals such as Cerin-
and the Torah by focusing upon the temple rhetoric in 1 Cor thus. The overwhelming emphasis of the volume is upon
3:16-17. He concludes that the early Christian community texts, but the discussion of Jewish Christian groups and a
understood itself as God’s temple, thus implying a break chapter on the archeological evidence for Jewish Christians
from the Jerusalem temple and its rituals of atonement open the way to further sociological work on the issues.
because it experienced the spirit of God. Other essays also Along with the editors, the writers constitute an interna-
deal with some aspect of the Law. R. Bergmeier deals with tional team of scholars (J. C. Paget, R. Bauckham, D. A.
Rom 2:12-16, 25-29 and argues that the “law written on their Hagner, P. Hirschberg, C. A. Evans, T. Elgvin, G. Stanton, W.
hearts” refers to Gentile Christians, not just to Gentiles gen- Kinzig, S. Hidal, G. af Hällström, L. Lahey, A. Ekenberg, P. S.
erally (cf. 2:14). P. von Gemünden studies the relation of the Alexander, and J. F. Strange). With extensive bibliographies,
Law to passion and desire in 4 Maccabees and compares indices, and an affordable price, this volume should become
those views with passages from Romans, particularly the new starting point for any study of Jewish followers of
Romans 7. The author of 4 Maccabees is more optimistic Jesus in antiquity. Highly recommended.
about the law’s power to control desire than is Paul. O. Fred W. Burnett
Hofius deals with the Law and “reconciliation” in 2 Cor Anderson University
5:18-21; H. Kuhn deals with the understanding of the Law at
Qumran and in Paul; G. Nebe focuses upon the “law of CONFLICTED BOUNDARIES IN WISDOM AND
nature” and the “Torah-Law” in 1 Thess 1:9-10; D. Sänger APOCALYPTICISM. Edited by Benjamin G. Wright and
deals with the Law and paidagōgos in Gal 3:24; G. Theißen Lawrence M. Wills. Symposium Series, 35. Atlanta/Leiden:
analyzes the Law and the rhetorical “I” throughout Romans; Society of Biblical Literature/E. J. Brill, 2005. Pp. viii + 240.
M. Klinghardt focuses upon “law” in Mark and Luke; and M. $32.95.
Konradt analyzes the fulfillment of the Law and the conflict In modern scholarship, at least since G. von Rad argued
with the Pharisees in the Gospel of Matthew. that apocalyptic thought derived from wisdom circles
Two essays deal with methodological issues: J. H. Char- (1972), the relationship of the categories of wisdom and
lesworth on how to clarify the literary dependence of a text apocalyptic have been greatly debated. The twelve essays
upon one that predates it, and P. Lampe deals with the rhe- collected here give an important taste of the debate from the
torical analysis of Pauline texts. Other essays include R. Wisdom and Apocalyptic Group of the SBL. These essays
Kirchhoff’s study of the “servant” language in Rom 12:1-2; G. were judiciously chosen from those presented in the group
W. E. Nickelsburg’s “Torah and the Deuteronomic Scheme in from 1994 to 2004 (a complete listing of all papers that were
the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha”; B. Schaller on the presented is included). The volume is arranged in three
theme of “hope” in Rom 15:7-13; H. Thyen on the mystery of parts: “Issues and Outlook” (a major essay by G. W. E.
Israel in Rom 11:25-32; and O. Wischmeyer on the genre of Nickelsburg, a response by S. J. Tanzer, and a response by
the letter of James. This is an important collection for Nickelsburg); “Wisdom and Apocalypticism in Early
research libraries. Judaism” (five essays by M. J. Goff, R. A. Werline, B. G.
Fred W. Burnett Wright III, P. A. Tiller, and R. A. Horsley); and, “Wisdom and
Anderson University Apocalypticism in Early Christianity” (four essays by P. J.

291
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

Hartin, Tiller, B. R. Rossing, and E. B. Aitken). Essays deal ticed this enculturation for the sake of evangelism. He
with texts (form, genre, and so forth) but also with social further suggests that this ancient enculturation of the
locations and politics. The papers are too diverse to summa- Supper traditions can serve as a model for contemporary
rize, but there are important and provocative conclusions Christian mission. This study reflects more significant
throughout the collection (e.g., Rossing’s thesis that the engagement with NT scholarship than most missiological
so-called “two ways” tradition should include, if not be books but will still leave many NT scholars underwhelmed.
renamed, the “two-women” tradition, which she finds is Nonetheless, no serious student of either the Supper tradi-
commonly used in sapiential and apocalyptic traditions, as tions or the mission theme in the NT can afford to overlook
well as in secular Greek writings). This is an important this volume.
collection that is recommended for every research library. Thomas E. Phillips
Fred W. Burnett Point Loma Nazarene University
Anderson University
THE STUDIA PHILONICA ANNUAL. Edited by David T.
THE MESSIAH IN EARLY JUDAISM AND CHRIS- Runia and Gregory E. Sterling. Studies in Hellenistic
TIANITY. Edited by Magnus Zetterholm. Minneapolis: Judaism, XVIII. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2006.
Fortress, 2007. Pp. 163. $18.00. Pp. viii + 245. $39.95.
This volume provides a diachronic introduction to mes- The lead articles in this annual publication are: “Moses’
sianism within Judaism and Christianity from the fall of Physiologia and the Meaning and Use of Physikôs in Philo of
Jerusalem in the sixth century BCE through the destruction Alexandria’s Exegetical Method” (S. Di Mattei); “Conscience
of the Second Temple and the rise of rabbinic Judaism. The and Free Speech in Philo” (P. R. Bosman); and “Two Short
volume emphasizes that messianism was and is a highly Notes on Philo” (P. W. van der Horst), which are his
diverse phenomenon that must be investigated in its diver- responses to articles by F. Shaw and A. Kerkeslager in
sity. J. J. Collins writes the first chapter on the pre-Christian volume XVII on Caligula’s use of the name of the God of the
origins of messianism, particularly as found in the LXX and Jews and on the influence of Dionysios, Lampo, and Isidorus
Dead Sea Scrolls. A. Y. Collins and M. Zetterholm discuss during the violence of 38 CE in Alexandria. A “Special
messianism among early Jewish Christians, particularly as Section” (50 pages) focuses upon Philo’s De Virtutibus with
found in the Synoptic Gospels and Paul’s letters. K. Hedner- articles by both editors, D. Konstan, and J. R. Royse. A review
Zetterholm explores messianism within rabbinic Judaism article (J. Annas) reviews five books and works on Plato’s
and J. Steppa discusses how messianic ideas were adapted Timaeus, and this is followed by a bibliography on Philo
by Christians as Christianity became a non-Jewish religion. through 2003, with a provisional supplement through 2006.
The volume provides a splendid introduction to the history of The final sections consist of nine book reviews, and news
messianism and will be required reading for all future notes on the “Philo of Alexandria Group” of the SBL, a new
researchers on the topic; it is recommended for libraries at research project on Philo and Plutarch, and an in memoriam
all levels. The volume is accessible to undergraduates but for R. Arnaldez. The introduction to the volume also notes
still useful for graduate students. the passing of D. Hay who worked for many years with both
Thomas E. Phillips this volume and with the accompanying monograph series.
Point Loma Nazarene University This is a helpful and necessary acquisition for anyone inter-
ested in Philo’s role in Hellenistic Judaism, and in ideas that
MORE THAN A PASSOVER: INCULTURATION IN are crucial for understanding Hellenistic Judaism and the
THE SUPPER NARRATIVES OF THE NEW TESTA- world of early Christianity.
MENT. By Fergus J. King. NT Studies in Contextual Exege- Fred W. Burnett
sis, 3. New York: Peter Lang, 2007. Pp. 395. $103.95. Anderson University
This slightly condensed version of King’s Ph.D. disser-
tation under P. Grabbe and E. Botha at the University of WHO DO MY OPPONENTS SAY THAT I AM? AN
South Africa works at the interface of missiology and NT INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST
studies. King proceeds from the initial observation that the THE HISTORICAL JESUS. Edited by Scot McKnight and
themes of Eucharist and mission tend to be sharply sepa- Joseph B. Modica. Library of NT Studies, 358. New York: T &
rated within NT studies, with nearly all investigations pre- T Clark, 2008. Pp. 175. $130.00.
suming that the Lord’s Supper was the ultimate insider The seven essays in this volume each examine one
event and entirely separate from mission concerns. This of the seven accusations leveled against Jesus in the
observation has motivated King to consider the historical gospels—accusations that Jesus was demon-possessed, a
origins of the Supper traditions in the NT; in the course of law-breaker, a glutton and drunkard, a blasphemer, a false
this investigation, he finds that various Jewish, Greco- prophet, an illegitimate son, and that Jesus falsely claimed
Roman, and distinctively Christian traditions are merged in to be king of the Jews. The volume was conceived as an
the NT Supper traditions. King labels this merger of tradi- expansion of McKnight’s splendid article in the Journal for
tions “enculturation” and argues that the NT writers prac- the Study of the Historical Jesus (1.1 [2003]: 73-103) in

292
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

which McKnight sought to develop further B. Malina’s and than by the main title. Mosse, who has a background in both
J. Neyrey’s idea of investigating “Christology from the science and mathematics, wishes to engage in a “scientific
side,” that is, considering what Jesus’ detractors said about investigation of the past,” by which he primarily means
him. McKnight’s contribution in the present volume, applying Occam’s razor to the study of early Christianity. He
clearly the strongest chapter in the book, retains that insists that scholarly theories must “not be multiplied
agenda. However, some of the other essays lack clear focus beyond what is necessary.” According to Mosse, the theories
and methodological rigor (everything in the gospels seems of Q and of the pseudonymous authorship of various NT
to pass the authenticity test for some of the contributors to letters are unnecessary theoretical constructs. Mosse
this volume). The generative idea behind the volume is accepts the traditional authorship of Mark and Markan pri-
interesting and potentially illuminating but with only a ority, but he dates Mark Gospel in 45 CE. According to Mosse,
scant introduction and no conclusion, the volume lacks Matthew then wrote his gospel in the late 40s or early 50s,
cohesion and the quality of the essays is quite uneven. The using Mark and an Aramaic source; Luke wrote his gospel in
volume will find its primary audience among specialists 61 CE, using Mark and Matthew as sources (Acts followed in
in historical Jesus studies, particularly those who are 62 CE). Many readers will dismiss this work as uncritical or
maximalists. fundamentalist, but that assessment would be inaccurate
Thomas E. Phillips (e.g., Mosse regards 2 Corinthians as a composite document).
Point Loma Nazarene University This volume is a thorough and well-conceived summary of
conservative scholarship (although admittedly mostly
FEINDES- UND BRUDERLIEBE IM WIDERSTREIT? older—and often seriously dated—scholarship). More serious
EINE VERGLEICHENDE STUDIE ZUR SYNOPTIS- critics of the work will wonder if Mosse has employed
CHEN UND JOHANNEISCHEN AUSPRÄGUNG DES Occam’s razor as consistently as he believes he has. On the
LIEBESGEBOTS. By Martin Hochholzer. Europäische one hand, even a quick perusal of any one of his ubiquitous
Hochschulschriften. New York: Peter Lang, 2007. Pp. 363. charts will leave many readers wondering what ever became
$86.95. of the simplicity of explanation that Mosse demands from
This exceptional volume is Hochholzer’s dissertation other scholars. On the other hand, Occam’s razor does allow
(completed in 2005 under Otto Schwankl at the University of for theories which were necessary to explain the evidence
Passau—where Hochholzer now teaches). Hochholzer’s (e.g., just because Pauline authorship of 1 Timothy is simpler
project is to investigate the synoptic tradition of love for does not mean that it is correct). In any case, a sustained
enemy (Matt 5:38-48; Luke 6:27-36) and the Johannine tra- reexamination of widely held assumptions is usually a good
dition of brotherly love (John 13:34; 15:9-17; 1 John 2:7-11; thing—and by that criterion, this is a worthwhile book, even if
3:10-24). He pursues his project in three stages. First, he most readers will remain unconvinced.
examines love in Greco-Roman and ancient Jewish texts, Thomas E. Phillips
emphasizing the OT theme of love for neighbor as the origin Point Loma Nazarene University
of both the synoptic and Johannine traditions. Second, he
carefully compares the synoptic and Johannine instructions. THE TESTING OF JESUS IN Q. By C. Michael Robbins.
Although he argues that the synoptic call for love of enemy Studies in Biblical Literature, 108. New York: Peter Lang,
originated with the historical Jesus, he also suggests that 2007. Pp. 203. $68.95.
both the Johannine and synoptic instructions took their This volume, Robbins’s revised dissertation (completed
present form in dialogue with the specific situation of the in 2000 at Claremont Graduate University under the direc-
respective evangelist’s community (he accepts that the syn- tion of J. M. Robinson), argues that the first temptation in the
optic call entered the gospels through the Q document). Q narrative is typological and is modeled after the wandering
Finally, he considers the significance of his findings for of Israel and the Exodus themes of wilderness, hunger, and
Christian ethics. This volume represents the best in disser- bread. According to Robbins, the first temptation in Q is
tation writing and should be required reading for scholars in more closely related to the temptation narrative in Mark
the many fields with which it interacts (particularly gospel than are the second and third temptations, temptation
studies, historical Jesus, and Christian ethics). stories which Robbins characterizes as more mythological
Thomas E. Phillips and christologically charged. Robbins suggests the second
Point Loma Nazarene University and third temptations quite possibly are post-Easter
theological cogitations about Jesus’ death, resurrection and
THE THREE GOSPELS: NEW TESTAMENT victorious enthronement. Robbins suspects that the tempta-
HISTORY INTRODUCED BY THE SYNOPTIC tions in Q were concentric and had their original theological
PROBLEM. By Martin Mosse. Paternoster Biblical Mono- center in the second temptation. Luke, therefore, probably
graphs. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2007. Pp. 364. $50.00. preserves the original order of Q more accurately than does
In this ambitious volume, Mosse seeks to reestablish the Matthew. As with most dissertations, the appeal of this
traditional dates and authorship of nearly all NT writings. volume will be largely limited to experts in the particular
The book’s agenda is therefore better revealed by the subtitle subfields directly addressed in the volume (Q studies, his-

293
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

torical Jesus, pre-canonical Christology). The historical judg- the interpretive tradition by including images of a destruc-
ments that are prerequisites to the explorations in this book tive eschatological meal. According to Smit, the overall effect
will appear speculative to many readers. of these themes in the NT is to reaffirm the image of the just
Thomas E. Phillips world to come. This book offers many original observations
Point Loma Nazarene University and useful analyses, but more than a few readers will
suspect that Smit could benefit from a skilled editor with a
gift for the mechanics and economy of language. The book
PSALM 22 UND DIE PASSIONSGESCHICHTEN DER will reward patient scholarly readers.
EVANGELIEN. Edited by Dieter Sänger. Biblisch- Thomas E. Phillips
theologische Studien, 88. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener,
Point Loma Nazarene University
2007. Pp. 159. $45.00.
This volume provides a disciplined attempt to explore
the issue of Biblical intertextuality through the careful analy- DID JESUS TEACH SALVATION BY WORKS? THE
sis of a single psalm and its afterlife in other texts. Psalm 22, ROLE OF WORKS IN SALVATION IN THE SYNOP-
the text under consideration, is one of the most frequently TIC GOSPELS. By Alan P. Stanley. Evangelical Theological
cited OT texts in the NT. This investigation into the psalm is Society Monograph Series. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2006.
divided into five chapters: one on the Hebrew text on the Pp. 415. $42.00.
psalm (by H. Strauß), one on the Greek LXX version of the The primary foci of this study are Matthew 5:20-26,
psalm (by E. Bons), one of the reception of the psalm in 45-48; 7:21-23; 10:22; 18:21-35; 19:17-21; 24:13; 25:34-46;
Second Temple Judaism (by H. Omerzu), one on the use of the and, Luke 10:27-28, and the relevant parallels. In its exami-
psalm in Luke’s Gospel (by D. Rusam), and one on the psalm’s nation of these passages, this volume, a revised Ph.D. dis-
influence on John’s Gospel (by M. Labahn). The volume’s use sertation completed under D. Bock at Dallas Theological
of multiple authors ensures that each essay reflects the latest Seminary, answers the question of its title with a decisive
scholarship in each author’s subdiscipline, but this concern “no” and an equally decisive “yes.” According to Stanley,
for individual expertise comes at the price of both some Jesus (whose voice is indistinguishable from the voice of
redundancy and unresolved loose ends. In spite of the weak- the Synoptic Gospels in this book) taught that one enters
nesses inherent to any multiple-authored volume, this work the Christian life entirely by faith apart from works but that
is stimulating and provocative. It will prove useful for those one maintains one’s salvation by works. According to
working on a broad range of issues, including intertextuality, Stanley, salvation is contingent upon works but not upon
reception of the biblical texts, formation of the gospels, and sinlessness. The volume is coherently argued and aware of
the theology of the passion narratives. most of the scholarship that directly addresses the question
Thomas E. Phillips under consideration. Still, many readers will doubt whether
Point Loma Nazarene University Stanley has correctly formulated the question or adequately
interpreted some of his sources, particularly E. P. Sanders’s
classic Paul and Palestinian Judaism. Many readers will also
FELLOWSHIP AND FOOD IN THE KINGDOM. By suspect that the volume is a thinly veiled piece of system-
Peter-Ben Smit. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum atic theology masquerading as biblical studies—although
Neuen Testament, 234. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008. Stanley would probably reject any major dichotomy
Pp. 496. €79.00. between the two disciplines. The appeal of this volume will
This revised dissertation (completed at the University of largely be confined to those who share Stanley’s Dallas
Bern under the direction of U. von Arx and U. Luz) examines Theological Seminary-derived hermeneutics and theological
the themes of eschatological meals and utopian abundance interests.
in the NT, particularly the gospels and Revelation. Smit com- Thomas E. Phillips
plains that most treatments of these themes presume an Point Loma Nazarene University
overly simplified development moving directly from Isaiah
25 to the NT writers. In this volume, he proposes to remedy
that situation by looking at the relevant texts in detail. He MATTHEW’S GOSPEL AND JUDAISM IN THE LATE
certainly makes good on his intention to provide detailed FIRST CENTURY C.E.: THE EVIDENCE FROM MAT-
analysis (he invests over 140 pages to defend his negative THEW’S CHAPTER ON PARABLES (MATTHEW
conclusion that John’s Gospel does not, and Mark’s probably 13:1-52). By Anthony O. Ewherido. Studies in Biblical Lit-
does not, contain these themes). His most important conclu- erature, 91. New York: Peter Lang, 2006. Pp. xv + 277.
sions are that these themes had a rich and diverse historical $74.95.
development in both biblical and non-biblical texts; that the This revised dissertation (Fordham University, guided
themes probably made their way into Luke (where they are by R. J. Dillon and D. Béchard) deals with the general issue
more common than in any other NT book) and Matthew of the social location and identity of the post-70 CE
through the influence of Q; and that these themes are also Matthean community. Ewherido primarily uses redaction-
important in Revelation where the revelator added a twist to criticism on Matthew 13:1-52 as the entrée by which to

294
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

draw sociological conclusions about Matthew’s community. BUILT UPON THE ROCK: STUDIES IN THE GOSPEL
He finds that throughout the Matthean narrative, and par- OF MATTHEW. Edited by Daniel M. Gurtner and John
ticularly in Matt 13, there is a growing alienation between Nolland. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008. Pp. 347. $34.00.
Jesus and “Israel,” which represents for Ewherido the This collection of 13 essays from the 2005 Tyndale Fel-
growing alienation of the Matthean community from the lowship NT Study Group (Cambridge) is both a scholarly
larger Jewish community. For Ewherido, the alienation has assessment of major issues in the Gospel of Matthew and a
reached the stage of an irreconcilable rift with Judaism as confessional effort. As the editors say, “. . . to each of us a
Matthew’s community continues to allow the influx of Gen- personal commitment to Jesus Christ remains the foundation
tiles. Matthew 13, as well as the larger themes of the of our scholarly endeavors,” but equally, “. . . the papers here
Matthean narrative, “represents a separation that already presented should also make a contribution to scholarship in
existed in the time of the evangelist between disciples and its broadest sense.” Indeed they do. Topics cover these issues:
outsiders (i.e., between the Matthean community and the Matthew’s sources, both oral and written (A. D. Baum); a
synagogue or parent group).” This is a model redaction- linguistic analysis of how Matthew’s story is presented (S. L.
critical study that amplifies both the literary and sociologi- Black); the relationship of Law and righteousness in Matthew
cal aspects of the method. It is a welcome addition to (R. Deines); Matthew’s understanding of salvation-history
Matthean scholarship. (M. Eloff); the literary and theological function of “Jerusalem”
Fred W. Burnett in Matthew (R. T. France); the relation of the Matthean com-
Anderson University munity to Judaism (Gurtner); “Matthew and Anti-Semitism”
(Nolland); holiness and Matthew’s community (D. A. Hagner);
THE TORN VEIL: MATTHEW’S EXPOSITION OF Pauline ideas and the Sermon on the Mount (D. Wenham);
THE DEATH OF JESUS. By Daniel M. Gurtner. Society for quotations of the OT in Matt 2 (D. Instone-Brewer); “‘The
NT Studies Monograph Series, 139. New York: Cambridge Virgin Will Conceive’: Typological Fulfillment in Matthew
University Press, 2007. Pp. xxii + 297; diagram; 3 appendi- 1:18-23” (J. M. Hamilton Jr.); “The Use of the Isaianic Hearing
ces. $90.00. Motif in Matthew 11:2-16:20” (J. K. Brown); and “Reflections
This revised Ph.D. dissertation (directed by Professor R. on the Writing of a Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew”
J. Bauckham, the University of St. Andrews) examines the (France and Nolland). This is a strong and welcome collection
Matthean meaning of the torn veil in relationship to Jesus’ of essays by a good mixture of senior and younger evangelical
death. Gurtner first conducts a tradition-historical study of scholars from a diversity of international locations.
sacred veils and their counterparts in the Hebrew Bible, the Fred W. Burnett
Second Temple, and in rabbinic Judaism. He then has a Anderson University
composition-critical study of Matt 20:50, 51a, and 51b-53
that places these verses within the whole Matthean narra- ISRAEL, KIRCHE UND DIE VÖLKER IM MAT-
tive, and particularly the Passion Narrative. Gurtner has an THÄUSEVANGELIUM. By Matthias Konradt. Wissen-
impressive and detailed overview of the diversity of mean- schaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament, 215.
ings for the symbol of the veil and its counterparts, and of the Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007. Pp. xi + 493. €99.00.
history of interpretation of the velum scissum. Even in Mat- According to Konradt, the central theological problem in
thew’s time, there were diverse interpretations of the torn Matthew’s gospel is that the Matthean community is trying
veil in relation to Jesus’ death, but Gurtner argues that to make the transition from the pre-Easter ministry of Jesus,
Matthew introduces apocalyptic themes into the torn veil which was restricted to Israel, to its post-Easter identity as a
in order to clarify that Jesus’ death provided direct access to community that now has a universal mission. Matthew’s
the divine by removing the veil—and any other cultic gospel tries to educate its readers on how they as the
impediment—to God. Using primarily Ezekiel 37 and the “church” should now behave in their role as the followers of
dwelling of the returned exiles in God’s presence, Matthew the Messiah and as the “people of God.” In order to show this,
understands the torn veil as the fulfillment of eschatological Konradt has a meticulous yet sweeping study of Matthew’s
hopes when God’s presence will dwell among the people. narrative: the ministry of Jesus and his disciples to Israel
This salvific theme is foreshadowed in Matthew’s narrative (ch. 1); Israel’s reaction to the Jesus’ ministry (ch. 2), espe-
in several places, most notably in what Matthew presents as cially the reaction that culminated in the Passion (ch. 3);
the “opening” (avnoígw) of the heavens at Jesus’ baptism as Matthew’s view of the consequences of Israel’s negative
the eschatological revelatory time (Matt 3:16 cf. scízw in reaction to Jesus (ch. 4); Matthew’s presentation of Israel’s
Mark 1:10). Overall, the life and death of Jesus is the general relation to the “nations” in comparison with the
fulfillment of the Emmanuel theme that Jesus is somehow particular understanding about the universal mission, or the
God’s presence with the people (Matt 1:23). Highly recom- “Great Commission” (Matt 28:18-20), by Matthew’s group
mended for Matthean scholars and students of the passion (ch. 5); and the Matthean community’s understanding of the
narratives. relationship between Israel and the church (ch. 6). Konradt
Fred W. Burnett does not believe that a decisive break has occurred between
Anderson University the Matthean community and Judaism, and that the commu-

295
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

nity does not see itself as the “new” or the “true” Israel. three commentaries are written from a broadly evangelical
Instead, Matthew’s gospel presents Jesus’ identity, even in perspective. They are reviewed here according to the order
his own ministry, as both the obedient son of God and the in which they appeared. The first commentary is R. T.
son of David. This twin Christological concept provides the France’s volume in the NICNT series. France is a well-known
bridge and the theological unity between Matthew’s commu- Matthean scholar who has already written a shorter, less
nity and Israel, as well as between Jesus’ pre-Easter ministry technical commentary on the First Gospel (Matthew [TNTC 1;
and messianic understanding to the Matthean community’s Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1987]) and a volume on
post-Easter identity as the people of God. A very important Matthean issues (Matthew: Evangelist and Interpreter
book for Matthean scholars to engage. [Exeter: Paternoster, 1989]). In his introductory remarks, he
Fred W. Burnett states that this commentary is not a rehashed version of his
Anderson University previous work on Matthew. Rather, he provides fresh exege-
sis and offers his “mature reflections” on Matthew’s narra-
DIE FRÜHESTE ÜBERLIEFERUNG DES MAT- tive. The commentary begins with a brief overview of
THÄUSEVANGELIUMS (BIS ZUM 3./4. JH.): traditional introductory concerns. France refers readers to
EDITION UND UNTERSUCHUNG. By Kyoung Shik Min. his previous two publications on Matthew for a fuller treat-
Arbeiten zur neutestamentlichen Textforschung, 34. Berlin ment. In keeping with the aims of the series, this volume
and New York: De Gruyter, 2005. Pp. x + 357. $127.00. provides technical analysis in a traditional verse-by-verse
This slightly revised dissertation presents the text format that attempts to relate the smaller units to the larger
(which nearly always follows the editio princeps) of fourteen whole. France does not outline a specific methodology, but it
early papyri of Matthew (1, 35, 37, 45, 53, 64 + 67, 70, 77, is clear that his approach is stridently historical-critical
101, 102, 103, 104 and 110) and one majuscule, 0171. Each throughout. His exegesis consistently references the Greek
is accompanied by an apparatus and analysis of the frag- text and he interacts with a broad range of scholarship in
ment’s scribal character (7 are “frei,” 1 “sehr frei,” 3 English as well as the modern research languages. France’s
“normal,” and 4 “fest”) and textual quality (3 are “normal” exegesis does a helpful job of locating Jesus in his first-
and 11 “fest,” in comparison with the Ausgangstext [which century Jewish setting and shows a concern for intertextual
here = NA27]). An introduction (focusing on “text types” and issues and OT themes. This volume is sure to become one of
methodological questions) and a summary assessment of the standard authorities among those focusing on Matthean
implications (for the transmission of the NT text in general studies. B. Witherington’s commentary in the Smyth and
and Matthew in particular) round out the volume (which Helwys series aims to reach a wide array of Bible readers by
includes a bibliography and indices). As the use of the “frei”/ providing features that are intended to facilitate ease of
“normal”/“fest” terminology suggests, the influence of the interpretation. Witherington attempts a “sapiential reading”
Alands’ Der Text des Neuen Testaments is evident throughout of the First Gospel, that is, he sees Matthew standing in the
the dissertation. Min argues that the text of Matthew as tradition of Hebrew wisdom literature. Rejecting the
preserved in these early fragments is very close to that found common idea that one of Matthew’s dominant themes is
in the major uncials (=Aleph and B) of the mid-fourth c. Thus, Jesus as the “new Moses,” Witherington argues that the
these fragmentary papyri do for Matthew what P66 and P75 do evangelist has crafted his material “to produce a compelling
for Luke and John: they push back the documentary evidence portrait of Jesus as both sage and Wisdom, as both the
for the existence of this textual tradition to the late second/ revealer of God and as Immanuel, as well as drawing on
early third c. This is a significant result. But the really inter- other major images of Christ as Son of God, Son of Man, and
esting question remains: to what extent do these witnesses Christ.” Witherington’s scholarship is of the high quality one
reflect the text as it existed at the close of the first century (a would expect from him, but this commentary is somewhat
century earlier, i.e., rather than a century and a half later)? frustrating. There are interruptions (maps, artwork,
Michael W. Holmes explanatory notes, etc.) on nearly every page. For those
Bethel University accustomed to using traditional commentaries, these extra
features make using the commentary quite distracting.
THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW. By R. T. France. The New However, Bible readers outside of academia will likely
International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand appreciate these features. The book also comes with a fully
Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007. Pp. lxiv + 1169. $60.00. searchable CD-ROM containing the entire text of the com-
MATTHEW. By Ben Witherington III. Smyth and Helwys mentary. Given the aims of the series, this commentary will
Bible Commentary. Macon, GA: Smyth and Helwys, 2006. likely be successful in helping many different Bible readers
Pp. xxii + 568. $60.00. understand and appreciate the text. In his commentary,
MATTHEW. By David L. Turner. Baker Exegetical Com- Turner outlines his intended contributions under five head-
mentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, ings: 1) his approach is narrative-critical, showing a concern
2008. Pp. xix + 828. $49.99. for both the final form of the text and the theological contri-
The last three years have seen the publication of three butions Matthew makes as an autonomous gospel; 2) he
full-scale exegetical commentaries on Matthew’s Gospel. All reads Matthew against the backdrop of Second Temple for-

296
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

mative Judaism(s); 3) he seeks to provide a combination of arship. Those seeking to engage either Luke’s Gospel or
analysis and synthesis; 4) he examines the text through the Evangelical scholarship will be better served by other
theological grid of progressive dispensationalism (a category volumes.
that will likely be unfamiliar to many non-evangelical Thomas E. Phillips
readers); and, 5) his translation philosophy throughout the Point Loma Nazarene University
commentary is dynamic equivalence. Of the three commen-
taries reviewed here, the BECNT is the most overtly evan- GOD AS FATHER IN LUKE-ACTS. By Diane G. Chen.
gelical and the volumes in this series that focus on biblical Studies in Biblical Literature, 92. New York: Peter Lang,
narrative have a tendency to get mired in establishing and 2006. Pp. 294. $73.95.
defending the historical minutiae of the text. However, This revised dissertation (completed at Fuller Theologi-
Turner is not overly concerned to demonstrate the historicity cal Seminary under the direction of M. M. Thompson) pushes
of every jot and tittle. Instead, he shows concern for the back against what is becoming a dominant concern within
literary and theological coherence of the narrative. While he contemporary NT studies, that is, the concern to regard early
affirms the historical accuracy of the text, he is more con- Christianity as an anti-imperial movement. Although Chen’s
cerned to trace the logic of the narrative. This approach basic project is to examine how the concept of father func-
makes his work unique among many evangelical commen- tions in Luke-Acts, she is not satisfied to stop with merely
taries on the First Gospel and it allows a unified reading of achieving that limited goal. Chen extends her inquiry to the
the text to emerge. Each of these commentaries will serve implications of Luke’s view of the fatherhood of God. Chen
the needs of different readers. All three volumes provide rejects both the facile stereotype of Greco-Roman fathers as
some benefit to those with advanced knowledge, but strict disciplinarians and disinterested parents and also the
France’s commentary in particular will serve scholars, semi- uncritical assumption that Christian depictions of father-
narians, and other students looking for in-depth analysis of hood were based upon a supposedly more compassionate
the text. Witherington’s commentary will help lay readers, Hebrew and Jewish conception of fatherhood. According to
clergy, and students, especially where background issues Chen, Luke-Acts adopts aspects of both Jewish and Greco-
are concerned. Turner’s commentary seems ideal for the Roman understandings of fatherhood—particularly the
pastor or teacher looking for an informed and accessible Jewish conception of God as a faithful Father to Israel and the
treatment of Matthew’s Gospel. Keeping these consider- Greco-Roman conception of the Roman emperor as the gen-
ations in mind, all three commentaries will find a niche erous and merciful pater patriae. This crisply written inves-
among readers and interpreters of the First Gospel. tigation has broad ranging implications for both Lukan
Christopher W. Skinner studies and studies of the Christian relations to the Roman
St. Mary’s Seminary and University Empire; it is highly recommended for theological libraries.
Thomas E. Phillips
Point Loma Nazarene University
THE SINNER IN LUKE. By Dwayne H. Adams. Evangeli-
cal Theological Society Monograph Series. Eugene, OR: Wipf SIGHT AND BLINDNESS IN LUKE-ACTS: THE USE
and Stock, 2008. Pp. 204. $25.00. OF PHYSICAL FEATURES IN CHARACTERIZA-
Although this study never identifies itself as such, it TION. By Chad Hartsock. Biblical Interpretation Series, 94.
reads very much like an unpublished dissertation. It con- Leiden: Brill, 2008. Pp. 226. $148.00.
tains a brief history of scholarship, a discourse on the pro- This volume is an audience-oriented reading of the
posed methodology, a survey of how the topic is discussed in theme of blindness in Luke-Acts. Because Hartsock has
Greco-Roman literature, and a reading of the relevant Lukan Luke’s ancient audience in mind, he begins by investigating
texts. Regardless of its origin, the volume employs a form of cultural assumptions about physiognomy (the relationship
“canonical literary criticism” largely derived from the work between external physical characteristics and internal
on NT scholars who wrote in the late 80s and early 90s (the moral character), as exhibited in Greco-Roman and Hebrew
bibliography ends in 1998 and no secular theorists are con- Bible sources. The work is heavily indebted to M. Parsons’s
sidered). Adams relies almost exclusively upon English lan- recent work (Body and Character in Luke and Acts, 2006) but
guage scholarship and shows no awareness of contemporary seeks to move beyond it by focusing more narrowly upon the
German, French, or Spanish scholarship (those versed in theme of blindness. Hartsock notes both that Luke’s Gospel
contemporary Lukan scholarship will find nothing new here emphasizes Jesus’ mission of restoring sight to the blind in
and, indeed, will often find serious omissions). Adams the programmatic opening sermon at Nazareth (4:16-30; cf.
argues that “sinner” is primarily a moral and legal category Isaiah 61) and also that Acts closes with Paul returning to
in Luke. According to Adams, the sinners in Luke are people the same theme in his final discourse (Acts 28:25-28). Hart-
with moral failings and who fall under the wrath of God on sock suggests that the opening of eyes is therefore a major
account of those failings. Although the volume appears in recurring theme in Luke-Acts and is worthy of more atten-
the monograph series of the Evangelical Theological Society, tion from scholars. This volume is a helpful introduction to
the volume does not represent the best of Evangelical schol- the study of physiognomy and provides some provocative

297
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

insights into Luke-Acts, but many readers will be left reversal of social status achieved by Jesus’ death and exalta-
wanting more interpretation of Luke-Acts than the forty tion. Interpreting Christian tradition, Luke transformed a
pages or so that Hartsock provides. Research libraries will collection of “L” parables and incorporated Paul’s epistolary
want a copy of this volume. self-description and theology. Luke the evangelist depicted
Thomas E. Phillips conversion as reconstituting the people of God vis-à-vis the
Point Loma Nazarene University Abrahamic covenant. Inconsistent integration of the author’s
previous work has resulted in an uneven volume. Neverthe-
UMSTRITTENER MONOTHEISMUS: WAHRE UND less, by bringing together many examples of Luke’s narrative
FALSCHE APOTHEOSE IM LUKANISCHEN DOP- strategies, setting these consistently within broader critical
PELWERK. By Ilze Kezbere. Novum Testamentum et Orbis frameworks, and providing useful bibliography, Parsons
Antiquus/Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testaments, 60. offers the seminary student or advanced undergraduate a
Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2007. Pp. 229. detailed introduction to Luke as author within three ancient
€39.90. contexts: pagan, Jewish, and emerging Christian.
This revised Ph.D. dissertation (written under the direc- Kindalee P. De Long
tion of G. Theissen) argues that the theme of deification plays Pepperdine University
a central role in the theology of Luke-Acts. After a brief
introduction to the theme of deification in the first century LUKE THE PRIEST: THE AUTHORITY OF THE
and among the Christian apologists, Kezbere argues that AUTHOR OF THE THIRD GOSPEL. By Rick Strelan.
Luke-Acts reflects the interaction of two cultures with differ- Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008. Pp. 194. $99.95.
ent traditions. On the one hand, Luke-Acts assumes the valid- Strelan’s thesis in this book is clear, coherent, and
ity of the Jewish commitment to monotheism. On the other almost certainly wrong. Strelan argues that contemporary
hand, Luke-Acts draws upon Roman imperial traditions of scholars “cannot, and probably never will, know what status
human deification in order to explain the person of Christ. Luke actually had, but this book has argued that to construct
According to Kezbere, Luke-Acts contains several stories him as a priest fits the bill better than most other viable
where God originates and testifies to Jesus’ deification. These options.” Strelan reaches this conclusion in a rather straight-
narratives of true deification (Jesus’ baptism in Luke 3:21; forward manner. He argues that priests were the owners,
Jesus’ transfiguration in 9:28-35; and Jesus’ ascension in controllers, and guardians of tradition in Judaism and that
24:50-53; Acts 1:9-11) are central to Lukan Christology. Luke’s self-appointed task of writing a history of early Chris-
However, Luke-Acts also contains several stories where dei- tianity placed him within this priestly tradition. From there,
fication finds its origin and testimony in human sources. Strelan speculates (with all the appropriate qualifications
These narratives of false deification (Satan in Luke 4:5-8; and modesty) that Luke probably drew upon his status as a
Herod Agrippa in Acts 12:21-23; Paul and Barnabas in Acts priest to take up the task of writing his gospel and Acts. This
14:8-20; Peter in Acts 10:25f; Paul and Silas in Acts 16:25-34; argument seems strained in light of the priests’ consistently
and Paul in Acts 28:1-6) serve as rebukes of the claims of the negative characterization in Luke, the only gospel explicitly
imperial cult. The work is significant, and deserves the direct to lay responsibility for Jesus’ death at the feet of the priests
attention of those working in Lukan studies or in early Chris- (24:20). Additionally, assuming the unity of Luke-Acts, as
tian interactions with the empire. Strelan does, the “we” sections of Acts give no hint of Luke’s
Thomas E. Phillips priestly status. In spite of these serious problems with
Point Loma Nazarene University Strelan’s thesis, this volume is worthy of a careful reading by
Lukan specialists.
LUKE: STORYTELLER, INTERPRETER, EVANGE- Thomas E. Phillips
LIST. By Mikeal C. Parsons. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Point Loma Nazarene University
Publishers, 2007. Pp. xxii + 230. $19.95.
A companion to three other volumes on the canonical DAS LUKAS-EVANGELIUM. By Michael Wolter. Hand-
gospels, Parsons’s book combines previously published work buch zum Neuen Testament, 5. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck,
with new material, centered on Luke as storyteller, inter- 2008. Pp. 798. Paper, €49.00.
preter, and evangelist. He argues that because Luke’s story- At most points, this commentary reflects the consensus
telling reflects the progymnasmata, knowledge of ancient of contemporary critical scholarship on Luke’s Gospel.
rhetoric yields insight into Luke and Acts. For example, Wolter briefly discusses and accepts the unity of Luke-Acts,
rhetorical ideals related to narrative (diēgēsis) illuminate the a late first-century date for Luke, and Luke’s dependence
Gospel’s prologue. As interpreter, Luke adapted ancient cul- upon Mark, Q and a unique written source. He remains
tural values, exhorting his readers (through the topos of uncommitted on the identification of the author of the third
friendship) and challenging conventional beliefs (about gospel with either the person referred to as “Luke” else-
physiognomy). Interpreting Jewish tradition, Luke modified where in the NT or with the person who originally composed
the traditional view of Jerusalem’s eschatological role, and he the “we” sections of Acts. Although Wolter interacts with the
depicted scripture (Isaiah 53 in Acts 8) as signifying the (largely American) literary criticism of the gospels from the

298
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

1990s, his comments consistently engage the text primarily writing Acts, traditions that Lüdemann defines broadly as
with the standard tools of the historical critical method. The “written sources, orally transmitted material, and general
considerable value of this commentary lies more in its able knowledge that was part of Luke’s cultural environment.” It
handling of recent scholarship than in originality or sweep- is these traditions that in Lüdemann’s view contain most of
ing new proposals. Wolter offers a comprehensive assess- the historical information in the book. Indeed, he judges the
ment of current European—particularly German—scholarship historical value of Luke’s final product quite harshly. The
on Luke; it will serve as a standard reference for several underlying traditions, however, include both history and
years. Scholars of the gospels and of Luke-Acts will want to legend. Lüdemann’s analysis of Acts involves four steps.
consult this volume regularly. First, he attempts to separate tradition from Lukan redac-
Thomas E. Phillips tion. Second, he explores Luke’s purpose for shaping tradi-
Point Loma Nazarene University tions as he did by analyzing the linguistic features and
narrative context of each passage. Third, he seeks to identify
A FEMINIST COMPANION TO THE ACTS OF THE the historical elements in the traditions by comparing
APOSTLES. Edited by Amy-Jill Levine with Marianne them with Paul’s letters—which he argues were not used by
Blickenstaff. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press, 2006. Pp. xii + Luke and so can corroborate matters of content and
242. $21.00. chronology—other independent sources, and Lüdemann’s
These excellent essays extend the series of feminist own reconstruction of primitive Christianity. Finally, he
interpretations to the complex and contested material in evaluates the historicity of each account as it stands. This
Acts. Typical of essay collections, there is no uniformity of study offers a careful historical-critical interpretation of
perspective, which happily illustrates the vibrant, pluriform Acts, providing a reasoned judgment about traditions that
state of feminist scholarship. Thus, while M. Kanyoro may underlie the narrative and proposing a conceivable
upholds Acts as a charter for Christians, especially women, reconstruction of Christianity in the period during which the
to reconfigure indigenous African missions, T. Penner and C. traditions were formed (30-70 CE).
Vander Stichele highlight the Lukan ideologies of violence, William Sanger Campbell
patriarchy, and colonization, cautioning against reinscribing The College of St. Scholastica
these oppressive practices today. Contributions by J. C.
Anderson and B. R. Gaventa insightfully evaluate earlier DATING ACTS: BETWEEN THE EVANGELISTS
interpretations of women in Acts. B. E. Reid’s sociohistorical AND THE APOLOGISTS. By Richard I. Pervo. Santa Rosa,
analysis criticizes Luke’s attempt to diminish the power of CA: Polebridge, 2006. Pp. xiv + 513. $47.50.
women, especially widows, in ministry, while the articles by Convinced that determining when Acts was written is
F. S. Spencer, J. M. Arlandson, and V. Burrus and K. Torjesen essential for a correct understanding of it and for recon-
explore the complex ways in which Luke affirms (and con- structing Christian origins, Pervo takes up the issue afresh.
strains) women providing material support and leadership He argues for ca. 115 CE, substantially later than the 75-85
for the community. R. M. Price, D. R. MacDonald, K. Cham- CE estimate that many scholars accept. According to Pervo,
bers, and S. Matthews (as well as Gaventa) interpret Acts via one of Luke’s sources was a collection of Paul’s letters, some-
comparison to Homer, Euripides, Greco-Roman comedies thing that was not available before the end of the first
and cultic traditions (respectively), with differing assess- century. In addition, Luke used Josephus’s Antiquities,
ments of the Lukan portraits of women. J. L. Staley weaves written in 93/94 CE. These sources are not obvious because
postcolonial and autobiographical insights together in an Luke recast the material to his purpose and in his language
engaging analysis of the “border women” in Acts 16. A. and style and incorporated it into the narrative without
Levine’s introductory essay is also a masterful synthesis and acknowledging sources, a common practice in antiquity.
contribution, giving structure to a volume essential for Pervo also argues that Acts reflects an emerging church
scholars of Acts and feminism. order similar to early second-century writings such as 1
Jason J. Ripley Clement and the Pastoral Epistles, and contains terminologi-
St. Olaf College cal and conceptual affinities with these and other texts from
that period. Finally, Pervo appeals to phrases and sentences
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES: WHAT REALLY in early Christian literature that allude to Acts or demon-
HAPPENED IN THE EARLIEST DAYS OF THE strate a common literary milieu, and anachronisms and theo-
CHURCH. By Gerd Lüdemann. Amherst, NY: Prometheus logical concepts that postdate 75-85 CE. Pervo’s carefully
Books, 2005. Pp. 419. $32.00. researched and thorough study will be useful primarily for
In this revision of his earlier monograph, Early Christian- Acts specialists, although he has attempted to make the book
ity According to the Traditions in Acts (1989), Lüdemann accessible to general readers. He includes in his analysis
assesses the historicity of the events narrated in Acts. In copious tables and several appendices, all of which are quite
doing so, he offers a careful historical-critical reading of helpful.
Luke’s second volume. Lüdemann argues that because Luke William Sanger Campbell
was not an eyewitness, the evangelist relied on traditions in The College of St. Scholastica

299
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

THE SAMARITAN MISSION IN ACTS. By V. J. not do, Jesus could. This book is of interest to specialists in
Samkutty. Library of NT Studies, 328. New York, NY: T&T Pauline theology, Galatians, Romans, and late Second
Clark, 2006. Pp. xiv + 259. $150.00. Temple Judaism.
Samkutty’s work, his Ph.D. thesis at the University Robert Paul Seesengood
of Sheffield under L. Alexander, examines the historical, University of North Carolina, Pembroke
literary, and theological significance of the Samaritan
mission in Acts 8:4-25. Part I delineates his historical and THE NEW PERSPECTIVE ON PAUL. By James D. G.
literary approach and surveys the history of research, Dunn. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008. Pp. xi + 539.
while Part II contextualizes the portrait in Acts, surveying $36.00.
the historically contested status of Samaritans and their Originally published in 2005 by Mohr Siebeck, this
portrayals in Luke. Given the questionable legitimacy of paperback edition is welcome for its affordable price. Of all
Samaritans among various Jews and Christians (cf. Matt scholars writing about the “new perspective on Paul,” Dunn
10:5), Samkutty highlights the favorable portraits of most deserves to use the phrase in his title, given that he
Samaritans in Luke as providing anticipatory legitimization coined it. The book is a collection of twenty of his essays
for the Samaritan mission in Acts. The final section pro- written between 1983, when he first referred to the new
vides structural, textual, and apologetic analyses of Acts 8, perspective on Paul in a public university lecture, and 2004.
affirming Luke’s defense of the Samaritan mission in Acts Two other chapters were written for this publication, includ-
as the actualized incorporation of the marginalized into the ing the opening lengthy piece, which is an overall evaluation
kingdom of God foreshadowed in the Third Gospel. on the new perspective, including a personal account of how
Samkutty thoroughly examines the narrative dynamics and Dunn came to his particular position, and a thorough engage-
contextual distinctiveness of the Samaritan mission. While ment with other scholars who have criticized his work, often
his approach allows him to posit both the historicity and without fully understanding it. This chapter is required
narrative unity of Luke-Acts, the particular combination of reading for anyone working in this area. The final chapter,
interpretive approaches potentially works at cross- an examination of Phil 3:2-14 with regard to the new per-
purposes. Many will question how traditio-historical criti- spective, was also produced for the book. Issues related to
cism’s dependence upon perceived literary inconsistencies Paul, Judaism, the Torah, and justification are far from
coheres with the presumption of literary unity in narrative resolved, and we are now seeing the emergence of a “post
analyses, and how structural criticism’s abstract, ahistori- new-perspective” on Paul. If scholars want a clear and
cal tendencies permit a rich appreciation of the historical detailed sense of what the new perspective on Paul is about,
and rhetorical particularities of Luke-Acts. Nonetheless, they must begin with this book.
Samkutty’s research makes important contributions to Alicia Batten
Lukan studies. University of Sudbury
Jason J. Ripley
St. Olaf College NEW CHAPTERS IN THE LIFE OF PAUL: THE
RELATIVE CHRONOLOGY OF HIS CAREER. By
WORKS OF THE LAW AT QUMRAN AND IN PAUL. Gregory Tatum. O.P. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph
By Jacqueline C. R. de Roo. NT Monographs, 13. Sheffield: Series, 41. Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association of
Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2007. $95.00. America, 2006. Pp. ix + 145. N.p.
This monograph is an expansion of de Roo’s doctoral The title of this book, an obvious play on J. Knox’s
thesis (written under S. E. Porter). Any reader in Pauline famous book on Pauline chronology, gives a strong clue
theology is well acquainted with debates on Paul’s view of about its basic direction. As with Knox, Tatum only accepts
“works of law” and judicial versus participationist models Paul’s uncontested letters (excluding Philemon) as the basis
of soteriology. De Roo approaches the question by analysis of for the letter chronology, Acts being derivative and second-
“works of law” (found in Galatians and Romans) in other ary. Also factoring into consideration is research on Paul’s
Second Temple Jewish literature. There are only ten (pos- opponents and an awareness of J. C. Beker’s insistence on
sible) occurrences; all are found in Paul and the writings historical contingency. Although for some this may seem to
from Qumran. De Roo finds the phrase in 4Q174 col. 3, l. 7 be a counsel of despair, Tatum views it as an opportunity for
and 4Qmmt C 27 (she rejects 1 QS 5.21 and 6.18). For clearing away faulty methodology. In contrast to older
Qumran, “works of law” expresses general obedience to approaches centered on tracing a linear theological develop-
God’s law (ethical and liturgical/cultic). All works of law are ment in Paul’s letters and culminating in Romans, Tatum
divine (God enables goodness via law). Qumran writings proposes a system for locating and tracing the development
suggest that a truly righteous person (particularly Abraham) of key issues in several letters. He claims that this allows
can, by superior works of law, atone for others’ transgres- him to determine historical sequence. Tatum demonstrates
sions. Paul seems to agree that perfect law-keeping could clearly a number of instances of the historical contingency of
atone for others. He rejects, however, that anyone could be Paul’s argumentation. Yet, in a short work of little over a
perfect apart from Jesus. What Abraham (or Qumran) could hundred pages, there are a number of arbitrary assumptions

300
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

(e.g., the composition of 2 Corinthians) and a failure to enter evangelical missiology. Little reasons that Paul’s theology
into dialogue with other key works. Valuable for method- (orthodoxy) cannot be separated from his practice (ortho-
ological issues of Pauline chronology, it is not a comprehen- praxy). Therefore, his missiological methods (orthopraxy)
sive treatment. are as normative for believers as his theology. The book has
Allan J. McNicol endless quotes and is more valuable for the comprehensive
Austin Graduate School of Theology analysis of the secondary sources than the particular conclu-
sions reached.
PAULUS. By Peter Wick. UTB Basics. Göttingen: Vanden- Allan J. McNicol
hoeck & Ruprecht, 2006. Pp. 219. Paper, €12.90. Austin Graduate School of Theology
Wick offers an introduction to Paul for the general
reader with little background in NT or Religious Studies. THE CORRUPTION AND REDEMPTION OF CRE-
He presents his material in four major sections (Der ATION: NATURE IN ROMANS 8.19-22 AND JEWISH
Berufene, Der Wortgewaltige, Der Theologie, and Der Missio- APOCALYPTIC LITERATURE. By Harry Alan Hahne.
nar). Each section includes “text boxes” highlighting main Library of NT Studies, 336. London: T & T Clark, 2007.
points, key terms, section summaries, and discussion ques- Pp. xvi + 265. £85.00.
tions. Each major section concludes with “for further Hahn’s book (a revised dissertation) contributes to the
reading” bibliographies (largely, although not exclusively, consensus that Romans 8:19-22 reflects Jewish apocalypti-
citing German monographs). Wick focuses on the seven cism by examining in detail how that passage and apocalyptic
undisputed letters. He accepts a fairly standard construc- literature portray the natural world. After reviewing second-
tion of Pauline “historical context.” His presentation of the ary literature, Hahne analyzes major turn of the era Jewish
Greco-Roman context, fairly typically, reveals a Paul at apocalyptic writings to consider how they describe the cor-
home with Greco-Roman rhetoric and philosophy. His treat- ruption, redemption, and personification of creation—themes
ment of Diaspora Judaism is brief (and a bit dated). His isolated from within the Romans 8 passage. Writings ana-
comparison of Pauline biography in Acts and the “Paul” lyzed include Jubilees, 4 Ezra, 2 Baruch, Apocalypse of Moses,
who emerges from the letters belies a very experienced Life of Adam and Eve, 2 Enoch, and sundry works subsumed in
hand in sorting out the key issues and illustrating the prob- 1 Enoch. Hahne next exegetes Rom 8:19-22 and demonstrates
lems. On the whole, Wick provides very little original argu- the perspectives it shares with those writings. Since Hahne
ment (to my mind, a desiderata for an introductory text) identifies common apocalyptic understandings of the natural
but restrains his own input to organization, clarity, and world while respecting the source documents’ diversity, he
summary of scholarly views. This volume would be a won- can situate Rom 8:19-22 specifically among its Jewish coun-
derful selection for introductory courses on Paul (provided terparts, which view the natural world as corrupted by human
the students read German). (not angelic) sin and as being eschatologically transformed
Robert Paul Seesengood (not replaced by a new creation). These writings also per-
University of North Carolina, Pembroke sonify nature to dramatize the consequences of corruption
and hope of redemption. Hahne’s analysis is concise, suffi-
MISSION IN THE WAY OF PAUL: BIBLICAL ciently documented, and accessible to scholars, with several
MISSION FOR THE CHURCH IN THE TWENTY- charts summarizing his findings.
FIRST CENTURY. By Christopher R. Little. Studies in Ronald Cox
Biblical Literature, 80. New York: Peter Lang, 2005. Pepperdine University
Pp. xii + 345. $76.95.
The author, who received a Ph.D. in intercultural studies MAL, SOUFFRANCE ET JUSTICE DE DIEU SELON
from Fuller, has a bone to pick with present missiological ROMAINS 1-3: ÉTUDE EXÉGÉTIQUE ET
practices among evangelicals. Little claims that the current THÉOLOGIQUE. By Erwin Ochsenmeier. Beihefte zur
process of channeling large amounts of money from wealthy Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die
Western churches to developing countries not only creates a Kunde der älteren Kirche, 155. Berlin/New York: Walter de
culture of dependence but is also not effective in creating Gruyter, 2007. Pp. xii + 392. $178.82.
healthy churches in mission fields. As an alternative, Little Ochsenmeier’s scholarly book provides an extensive,
commends Pauline mission practices that, he argues, were well-structured investigation into the themes of evil, suffer-
inherently cross-cultural and did not depend upon the trans- ing, and justice in Romans 1-3. He effectively builds the case
fer of resources from other places. Procedurally, the book that Paul addresses questions of theodicy right from the
falls into two parts. The bulk (170 pages) is a comprehensive beginning of Romans. The book’s great strengths include
study of Paul’s strategy for mission. It is surprisingly com- Ochsenmeier’s scrutiny of Paul’s Hebrew Scripture cita-
prehensive and far reaching. Studies range from the social tions, his examination of Paul’s grammar, and his compel-
history of early Christian centers to how mission fits into the ling interaction with Pauline and relevant interdisciplinary
wider framework of Paul’s theology. The second part of the scholarship. He concludes with a brief Moltmann-inspired
book, less interesting to RSR readers, discusses current reflection on a post-Holocaust understanding of suffering.

301
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

Ochsenmeier proposes that Paul intentionally cites passages man and Olbrechts-Tyteca (The New Rhetoric, 1971), New
from Hebrew Scripture whose original contexts show that Rhetoric differs from conventional “Rhetorical criticism.”
God deals justly with humanity in his own divine time. This While both pay attention to subtle elements of language and
suggests a biblically knowledgeable Roman audience. Suf- stress original “context” (knowing the “background” of a
fering befalls not only those who sin but also inevitably their given writing), New Rhetoric does not focus on set forms but
(just) victims. Fortunately, those who believe in God’s ability on how rhetoric “works.” Rhetoric is about persuasion and,
to fulfill his promises, as exemplified by Christ, may hope for therefore, power. New Rhetoric focuses on how images,
eventual salvation. Ochsenmeier’s reliance on the entire vocabulary, and structure construct (or reflect) systems of
Pauline corpus rather than simply the undisputed letters coercion and power. Tsang’s work concentrates on Paul’s
may generate debate. Also, his reflection on a post-Holocaust letter to the Galatians. Tsang finds Paul’s use of slavery
understanding of suffering would benefit from further con- rhetoric is rooted in Paul’s own self-defense against charges
sideration of what it offers Jewish victims, in light of his (perhaps of Paul acting in self-interest or his lack of status)
traditional interpretation of justification by faith. Overall, made by the “agitators.” From Slaves to Sons will be of inter-
this carefully argued and well-written book should generate est to scholars of Galatians, Paul’s views on slavery, “New
important further discussion. Rhetoric,” and feminist readings of Pauline literature.
Catherine Cavanagh Robert Paul Seesengood
Queen’s Theological College University of North Carolina, Pembroke

GALATIANS THROUGH THE CENTURIES. By John THE COLOSSIAN AND EPHESIAN HAUSTAFELN IN
Riches. Blackwell Bible Commentaries. Oxford: Blackwell THEOLOGICAL CONTEXT: AN ANALYSIS OF
Publishing, 2008. Pp. xvi + 336. $99.95. THEIR ORIGINS, RELATIONSHIP, AND MESSAGE.
This addition to the wonderful Blackwell Bible Commen- By James P. Hering. American University Studies, 260. New
tary series focuses, like the others in the set, on the reception York: Peter Lang, 2007. Pp. 285. $74.95.
history of Galatians through the centuries. Riches con- Hering maintains that the focus on the literary and
centrates on principal commentators such as Marcion, sociological provenance of the Haustafel in previous
Augustine, J. Chrysostom, T. Aquinas, M. Luther, J. Calvin, W. research presupposes that this form is a foreign element
Perkins, F. C. Baur, and J. B. Lightfoot, among others. After a within the larger context of the respective letters and
lengthy introduction that surveys some of the main issues as ignores the specifically theological reasoning in NT usage.
they have been received through the years, the book pro- He attempts to supply this missing dimension with an analy-
ceeds with ten chapters that follow consecutive sections of sis of the Haustafeln in Colossians and Ephesians. After a
Galatians. Each chapter has a different structure depending study of the history of research (ch. 1), he demonstrates that
upon the specific questions and issues that the portion of the the Haustafeln are dependent on the christological and
letter raises. For example, the chapter on Gal 1:10-24 con- ecclesiological arguments of the respective letters (chs. 2-4).
tains an account of perceptions of Paul’s “conversion” An analysis of ancient texts on household relations (ch. 5)
through the centuries, while the chapter on Gal 2:11-21 provides the basis for a comparison to NT Haustafeln. Hering
includes some discussion of Gal 2:20 in the mystical tradi- advances the discussion of this literary form by examining
tion. The book focuses throughout on the theme of Galatians not only the forms but also the ideas supporting the instruc-
as a “world building” text, and there is a helpful glossary of tions. He concludes that, while NT authors exhibit familiar-
commentators and terms at the end. Riches “richly” and ity with contemporary household texts, the emphasis on
engagingly documents the reception history of the letter, and sacrificial love rather than ontology distinguishes NT pas-
his book is a reminder that the reception history of such texts sages. Hering has made a persuasive case and an important
is no less important than the quest for its original meaning. contribution to the study of the household codes.
Alicia Batten James W. Thompson
University of Sudbury Abilene Christian University

FROM SLAVES TO SONS: A NEW RHETORIC ST. PAUL’S EPHESUS: TEXTS AND ARCHAEOL-
ANALYSIS ON PAUL’S SLAVE METAPHORS IN HIS OGY. By Jerome Murphy-O’Connor. Collegeville, MN: Litur-
LETTER TO THE GALATIANS. By Sam Tsang. Studies gical Press, 2008. Pp. xxi + 289. $29.95.
in Biblical Literature, 81. New York: Peter Lang, 2005. Part one of the book provides English translations of
Pp. x + 235. $66.95. passages from Greco-Roman writers in which Ephesus is
This volume is an adaptation of Tsang’s dissertation mentioned. These texts are briefly introduced and compli-
from the University of Sheffield (written under B. Matlock). mented by commentary on their historic and literary con-
Glancey (Slavery in the New Testament, 2002) has demon- texts. A lengthy collection from “Historians” is followed by a
strated the moral and ethical limits of slave metaphors in the shorter section from “Poets and Novelists,” both organized
NT. Tsang approaches Pauline slave metaphors and imagery alphabetically. Unfortunately, inscriptional evidence is
through the lens of “New Rhetoric.” Championed by Perel- almost completely ignored. In part two, Murphy-O’Connor

302
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

narrates his creative, if not rather too speculative, construc- of the individual chapters varies widely, but the quality is
tion of the life and times of Paul in and around Ephesus, uniformly high. All but the last two chapters (which reflect
drawing not only on the undisputed letters but also on upon contemporary considerations) are focused on a single
Pauline authorship of Colossians, the core of Ephesians, and issue or thinker. This approach has the considerable merit of
at least some aspects of the Pastoral Epistles. Acts is also allowing the authors to engage in original and penetrating
relied on for some historical detail. Despite the book’s sub- analyses which make genuine contributions to scholarship.
title, the emphasis throughout is on the textual evidence, However, this approach also means that coverage of issues of
although Murphy-O’Connor does draw on archeological wealth and poverty is unavoidably spotty in this volume; the
resources as background. The volume is more likely to be volume offers no comprehensive overview of the issues. The
“dipped into” rather than read cover to cover, except by those approach taken consistently throughout the volume is tradi-
working directly on Ephesus. A topical rather than authorial tional historical criticism; socioeconomic models and theo-
organization would better serve the navigation of the data, ries, when they appear, are largely borrowed and not
although a fairly extensive subject index is provided. Overall, original. Still, the volume is very successful as a collection of
Murphy-O’Connor is to be thanked for the work of drawing essays on this important theme; it is well indexed to facili-
together the literary texts relevant to this important site. tate ease of reference. This book is highly recommended for
Richard S. Ascough all libraries and individuals with an interest in economic
Queen’s University issues within early Christianity.
Thomas E. Phillips
ENGAGING BIBLICAL AUTHORITY: PERSPEC- Point Loma Nazarene University
TIVES ON THE BIBLE AS SCRIPTURE. Edited by
William P. Brown. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, AND I TURNED TO SEE THE VOICE: THE RHETO-
2007. Pp. xvi + 158. $19.95. RIC OF VISION IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. By Edith
Sixteen contributors treat the multifaceted question of M. Humphrey. Studies in Theological Interpretation. Grand
biblical authority from a variety of perspectives. Included Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007. Pp. 238. $22.99.
among the better known essayists are L. T. Johnson, F. J. The subtitle accurately indicates the scope of this trea-
Matera, and S. D. McBride, Jr. The contributors provide a full tise: the importance, and at times superiority, of visions in
panoply of scholarly insights, which are not inhibited by the NT compared with revelation through speech (the
their confessional backgrounds. Johnson and Matera illus- “word”) alone. At times, a vision serves to settle the argu-
trate the freedom with which Catholic scholars, from the ment made by a verbal revelation (with examples from 2
mid-twentieth century, if not before, have interpreted the Corinthians and Acts). At other times, the vision repeats the
Bible. McBride speaks from a Presbyterian stance. The dis- meaning of the words (Acts). Sometimes, visions come with
array that can exist in the Jewish community of scholars on objective propositions already enclosed within them (Book of
fundamental questions of authority and interpretation is Revelation). Visions can likewise serve as crucial revelations
described by P. Ochs. Both the biblical expert and the person that are as yet in an early stage of development (Luke,
in the pew continue beholden to the power of Scripture. That Matthew, Mark). Any visual element contained within verbal
is the good news. The bad news is that the conundrums of disclosures tends to make revelations more open to explica-
biblical authority are never-ending (round and round it goes, tion, less pinned down to a single interpretation, since the
and where it stops, nobody knows). Individual perceptions multifaceted imagination enters into play. Humphrey pro-
even within the same tradition can be dispiriting for those vides the reader (who will have to be a scholar or other
who are looking for absolutist solutions, whether on the part religious professional) with any number of fine insights. We
of modernists or fundamentalists. Better not to look for such are treated to the use of the (real but little-used) word
solutions but to be satisfied with the fact that both syna- “theurgy.” The Preface is dated to the “Feast of Saints Peter
gogue and church have always been content with the great and Paul, 2006” (easily recognized as June 29th for liturgi-
“main themes” of Scripture. As these essays ably demon- cally minded Catholics). In short, the treatise, which gives
strate, historical scholarship, properly understood, has due place to the neglected aspect of emotion versus mind in
fleshed out these themes, all to the benefit of those for whom interpretation, provides an excellent antidote to a purely
the Bible was written, expert and simple believers alike. verbal approach to the Bible.
Casimir Bernas Casimir Bernas
Holy Trinity Abbey Holy Trinity Abbey

WEALTH AND POVERTY IN EARLY CHRUCH AND THE BIBLE AND CONTEMPORARY CULTURE. By
SOCIETY. Edited by Susan R. Holman. Grand Rapids, MI: Gerd Theissen. Translated by David E. Green. Minneapolis:
Baker Academic, 2008. Pp. 320. $32.99. Fortress Press, 2007. Pp. xx + 163. $16.
The eighteen contributions in this volume examine To discuss the subject of this book’s title within the
wealth and poverty in the NT and various other early Chris- space of barely 150 pages might seem an act of hubris or
tian writings through the early Byzantine period. The focus folly, but Theissen manages to put forth coherent argu-

303
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

ments in language suitable for the nonspecialist. The THE VISIO PAULI AND THE GNOSTIC APOCALYSE
matrix for the treatment is, of course, Theissen’s own: why OF PAUL. Edited by Jan N. Bremmer and István Czachesz.
should the Bible interest anyone outside a confessional Studies on Early Christian Apocrypha, 9. Leuven: Peeters,
stance? While answering the question, Theissen manages 2007. Pp. xiii + 249. Paper, $60.00.
to expound any number of well-phrased insights. Thus, This volume contains the proceedings of the seventh
reading the Bible is not a self-evident obligation for the conference of the Dutch-Hungarian research group, which
unchurched. Great scientists such as Kepler and Newton was dedicated to Paul’s visions. The conference took place at
saw no dichotomy between physical science and biblical Károli Gáspár Reformed University in Budapest, 2001. Con-
faith. In fact, the contingency of the universe as expounded tributions are made by Hilhorst, Piovanelli, van Ruiten,
in the Bible has proven to be a great stimulus for empirical Copeland, Hogeterp, Czachesz, Adamik, Lanzillotta, Pesthy,
research. We learn the language of symbols found in the and Bremmer. The volume opens with a helpful chapter
Bible as we learn our native language—by hearing and introducing the manuscript and narrative traditions of the
using it, long before we become aware of the formal rules Apocalypse of Paul, and covering intertextual issues. The
of grammar and syntax. Studying the past, including that following chapters address the Prologue and four main
of the Bible, helps us in the present by acknowledging the themes: four rivers of Eden; the geography of the River
many ways in which human beings have struggled to Ocean; the relation of body and soul; and the tour of Hell.
become human. Contrary to Theissen, however, Catholi- Another chapter explores the Apocalypse of Paul as a piece
cism does not really make human authority or works abso- of “fantastic” literature. There is a useful textual and codico-
lute; just as Protestantism does not make the letter logical analysis of the Coptic version, and a short study of the
absolute. Such statements cry out for nuance. All things gatekeepers tradition found in the Nag Hammadi Gnostic
considered, however, this treatise by a veteran scholar version. A complete bibliography rounds out this edition.
deserves to find an audience among religiously committed This book is a very good way to introduce the Apocalypse of
and noncommitted alike. Paul to scholars unfamiliar with its difficult manuscript tra-
Casimir Bernas dition and content. The bibliography is extremely valuable
Holy Trinity Abbey as it includes all the different language editions as well as
general studies.
THE “MITHRAS LITURGY”. Edited by Hans Dieter Betz. April D. DeConick
Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum. Tübingen: Rice University
Mohr Siebeck, 2005. Pp. xxiii + 274; plates. $69.50.
Betz has made an ET and commentary of the late antique THE SECRET HISTORY OF HERMES TRISMEGIS-
papyrus called the “Mithras Liturgy.” It contains a critical TUS: HERMETICISM FROM ANCIENT TO MODERN
edition of the Greek manuscript including high quality TIMES. By Florian Ebeling. Translated by David Lorton.
photos of the papyrus. Although indebted to it, Betz’s work Foreword by Jan Assmann. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University,
replaces A. Dieterich’s edition, Eine Mithrasliturgie (1903), 2007. Pp. xiii + 158; illustrations. $29.95.
and is a welcome addition to other more recent study edi- This is an ET of Ebeling’s Das Geheimnis des Hermes
tions including M. Meyer’s The “Mithras Liturgy” (1976) and Trismegistos (München, 2005). As an introductory book, it
Reinhold Merkelbach’s third volume of Abrasax (1992). Betz familiarizes one with literature associated with Hermes
begins with a full introduction to the history of scholarship Trismegistos. Coverage includes ancient Hermeticism, Her-
on this papyrus, its discovery, origin, provenance, date, meticism’s encounter with Christianity in the Middle Ages,
authorship, and previous editions. He covers its genre and the impact of Ficino’s translation of Corpus Hermeticum,
composition. Betz makes a complete line-by-line literary Paracelsism, decline of Hermeticism in the seventeenth
analysis of the text, followed by a full commentary and bib- century, and its retooling in the eighteenth through twen-
liography. In contrast to previous scholars, particularly from tieth centuries. Content (especially ancient) lacks detailed
the old Religionsgeschichtliche Schule, he finds that it is analysis. Although space is devoted to ideology and com-
neither a Mithras liturgy, nor a Neoplatonic theurgical cer- munity, most is given to rehearsing the Hermetica’s recep-
emony, nor an initiation ritual into a Greek mystery-cult. He tion history. Ebeling argues for the existence of a northern
convincingly concludes that it originated in a milieu prior to Hermetic tradition independent of Ficino’s Italian theologi-
Neoplatonism, skeptical of traditional Egyptian religion, cal “revival.” The Germanic tradition was alchemical, based
likely reflecting nascent first and second century CE Herme- on Ars Hermetica, was passed on from Arabic sources, and
tism. Its magical instructions and philosophical musings influenced Rosicrucianism and the Freemasonary. The phy-
have not yet reached the stage of Gnosticism, and thus sician Paracelsus was understood to be the new Hermes,
predate the Corpus Hermeticum. This is an amazing figurehead of “alchemo-Paraclesism.” Sometimes Ebeling
resource for the study of ancient magic, Gnosis, Hermetism, thinks that the Hermetic literature should be properly
and other esoteric currents in antiquity. separated into magical-technical aspects and theological-
April D. DeConick philosophical. At other times, he advocates their unity. The
Rice University same fluctuation was noted in regard to whether or not

304
Religious Studies Review • VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2008

Hermeticism is “a” system or “many.” Ebeling is aware of “conceptual and intertextual blending,” contrasting “blend-
the questions of Hermeticism’s origins and Sitz im Leben, ing theory,” and “conceptual metaphor theory.” Chapter 3 is
but he does not develop satisfying discussions to either entitled “‘In Her Nature She is a Woman’: The Feminisation
question. Although I wished for more engagement with of the Soul in the Exegesis on the Soul.” Chapter 4 is entitled
Hermetic ideology and community, the book offers a fast- “‘No Longer a Christian, But a Christ’: Deification and Chris-
paced overview of the historical trajectory of Hermetic lit- tology in the Gospel of Philip.” In the concluding chapter,
erature, with stronger analysis of Renaissance materials Lundhaug compares the two tractates in terms of their
than any other. understanding of rebirth. In two appendices, Lundhaug pro-
April D. DeConick vides his own transcriptions and translations of the texts
Rice University treated. Lundhaug has thoroughly immersed himself in the
two texts, and comes up with some interesting new interpre-
tations of key passages. But his discussions, in my view, are
THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS. SECOND EDITION. Edited overburdened by the dense “cognitive poetic” jargon he
by Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, in employs. Even so, readers of the two tractates will find much
collaboration with François Gaudard. Washington, DC: of value in this book.
National Geographic Society, 2008. Pp. 224. $12.95. Birger A. Pearson
In this much-improved second edition of the Gospel of University of California, Santa Barbara
Judas, first published in 2006 (see the review in RSR 32: 197),
the translation is that of the Critical Edition published in 2007
but with a number of new and improved readings. The trans-
lation is accompanied by copious notes to the text and trans- History of Christianity (Early)
lation. Kasser’s essay on the story of the Codex Tchacos is
virtually unchanged. B. Ehrman’s essay on the “alternative
FROM THE LOST TEACHINGS OF POLYCARP:
vision of the Gospel of Judas” has been revised, but he retains
IDENTIFYING IRENAEUS’ APOSTOLIC PRESBY-
his earlier interpretation of the figure of Judas as Jesus’
TER AND THE AUTHOR OF AD DIOGNETUM. By
“closest friend.” In contrast, Meyer has dropped in his Intro- Charles E. Hill. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum
duction such references to Judas as a “hero” and “paradigm of Neuen Testament, 186. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.
discipleship,” obviously taking into account objections to this Pp. x + 207. $69.00.
interpretation raised by “revisionist” scholars. Wurst’s essay Hill offers two essays united by a shared claim: that
is updated, and two new essays have been included in the new Polycarp of Smyrna was the author/source of the anonymous
edition, “The Gospel of Judas and Other Gospels” by C. Evans material in question. The first essay makes a reasonably
and “Judas, a Hero or a Villain?” by G. S. Robinson. Robinson, persuasive case (previously proposed by Gilliard and Beat-
a “revisionist,” presents what I consider to be a thoroughly rice) for identifying Polycarp as the unnamed presbyter
persuasive interpretation of the figure of Judas in the Gospel whom Irenaeus cites in Against Heresies 4.27-32. That
of Judas. With this new edition, the National Geographic person was an anti-Marcionite elder, a disciple of apostles,
Society can be said to have redeemed itself. and a teacher/mentor of Irenaeus. Of the presbyters Ire-
Birger A. Pearson naeus names (e.g., Linus, Anacletus, Clement, and Polycarp),
University of California, Santa Barbara only Polycarp was personally known to him. Most of the
essay offers a useful discussion of the presbyter’s state-
ments and the implications of their attribution to Polycarp
“THERE IS A REBIRTH AND AN IMAGE OF for our understanding of Polycarp, Irenaeus, and Marcion.
REBIRTH”: A COGNITIVE POETIC ANALYSIS OF The second essay proposes (as Beatrice did independently)
CONCEPTUAL AND INTERTEXTUAL BLENDING IN that Polycarp is the author of the Letter to Diognetus. Hill
THE EXEGESIS ON THE SOUL (NHC II,6) AND THE labors valiantly to build as good a case as can be envisioned
GOSPEL OF PHILIP (NHC II,3). By Hugo Lundhaug. for the proposal. It is, however, a case constructed almost
Dissertation for the degree of doctor atrium (dr. art.). Bergen: entirely of possibilities (sometimes possibilities arising out
Faculty of Arts, University of Bergen, 2007. Pp. 323. N.p. of possibilities), circumstantial considerations, and generic
The quotation in the title of this book is taken from the (rather than unique, or even distinctive) linguistic parallels;
Gospel of Philip (67,12-14). With this quotation, Lundhaug there does not appear to be any hard evidence upon which to
begins his analysis of the concept of “rebirth” as found in the build. Hill succeeds in demonstrating the possibility that
two Coptic tractates treated, and poses the question: is this Polycarp is the author, thus adding his name to the list of
concept the same in both tractates? After an introductory fifteen or so other possible authors, but it is a slim possibility
chapter, Lundhaug discusses in Chapter 2 the theoretical at best. Of more value is Hill’s discussion of the integrity of
and methodological issues involved in his reading of the two Diognetus 1-10 and 11-12, which demonstrates that dogma-
texts. Lundhaug uses what he calls “cognitive poetics,” tism on this vexing question is unjustified.
deriving from research on metaphor and related subjects Michael W. Holmes
within the cognitive sciences. He discusses at some length Bethel University

305

You might also like