Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Source: http://www.catdumb.com/maltoy-asphalt-call-290/
Urban Street
Heavy vehicle traffic lanes
High volume traffic lanes
Advantages of Rigid Pavement
• Good durability Suitable for High-Volume & Heavy-
Vehicle Traffic
• Long service life
• Withstand repeated flooding & subsurface water
without deterioration
4
load
= relative damage factor
18,000 lb.
Typical Load Equivalent Factor (LEF)
6
5.11
5
ESALs per Vehicle
1.85
2
1.35
1
0.0007 0.10
0
Car Delivery Truck Loaded 18-Wheeler Loaded 40' Bus Loaded 60'
Articulated Bus
EALF = Wt18/Wtx
Wt18 = Wtx * EALF
Wt18 = no. of 18-kip single-axle load repetition
Wtx = no. of x-kip single-axle load repetition
For example
200 single-axle load of 20-kip
= 200 * 1.51 = 302 ESAL (18-kip)
EALF and ESAL
Single Axle Number of load
EALF ESAL
load (kips) repetition
12 200 0.19 37.8
14 117 0.36 42.1
16 85 0.62 53.0
18 (=18,000 lb) 61 1.00 61.0
20 47 1.51 71.0
22 21 2.18 45.8
24 12 3.03 36.4
26 6 4.09 24.5
28 3 5.39 16.2
30 1 6.97 7.0
32 1 8.88 8.9
34 0 11.18 0.0
Total ESAL 403.5
Approximate EALF
Concrete Layer
Subgrade Condition
Subgrade Condition
Pavement Materials
Layer Flexible Pavement Rigid Pavement
Surface layer -Concrete
Asphaltic
(AC)
- Portland Cement
Concrete (PCC)
Base - Crushed rock - Sand cushion
- Soil cement
- Pavement
recycling materials
- Selected materials
Sub-Base - Soil aggregate
- Soil (Sandy,
Sub-Grade Silt, Organic) Fine - Soil (Sandy, Fine
Silt, Organic)
Important of Sub-Grade
Rigid Pavement Flexible Pavement
Subgrade Condition
Subgrade Condition
Problem when Sub-Grade failed
California Bearing Ratio
Quality of Subgrade (CBR)
Measures shearing
resistance
•Characterized by Units: percent
• Strength Typical values: 0 to 20
(measured by CBR)
• Stiffness Resilient Modulus (MR)
(measured by MR) Measures stress-strain
relationship
Units: psi or MPa
Typical values: 3,000 to
40,000 psi
Typical Subgrade Condition
Classifi- CBR MR
Typical Materials
cation (%) (psi)
Gravels, crushed
Good ≥ 10 20,000 stone and sandy soils.
1. Rigid Pavement
- AASHTO (1993)
- Portland Cement Association
2. Flexible Pavement
- AASHTO (1993)
- Asphalt Institute (1970)
- Asphalt Institute (1991)
AASHTO (1993) PAVEMENT DESIGN
Based on AASHO Road Test (1956-1960) in Ottawa
(Illinois)
Objective of the
Test … to study the
performance of
pavement structures
of known thickness
under moving loads of
known magnitude and
frequency.
AASHO Road Test Location
< Chicago
∆PSI
log10
4 . 5 − 1 . 5 + 2.32 × log (M ) − 8.07
log10 (W18 ) = Z R × S o + 9.36 × log10 (SN + 1) − 0.20 +
1094 10 R
0.40 +
(SN + 1)5.19
• 1993 AASHTO Equation for Rigid Pavement
∆PSI
log10
log10 (W18 ) = Z R × S o + 7.35 × log10 (D + 1) − 0.06 + 4.5 − 1.5 + (4.22 − 0.32 p )× log ( 0.75
)
(Sc′ )(Cd ) D − 1.132
t 10
1.624 ×107
1+
(D + 1)8.46
215 . 63( J )D −
0 . 75 18 . 42
0.25
Ec
k
AASHTO Design Chart- Flexible Pavement
AASHTO Design Chart (segment 1)
AASHTO Design Chart (segment 2)
Example 1: Flexible Pavement Design
Use AASHTO 1993 method to design a new pavement
section of a 4-lane highway. The highway has 3 layers:
- Surface course (made from asphaltic concrete),
- Base course (made from crushed rock), and
- Sub-base course (made from soil aggregate) on top of
subgrade (existing soil).
Given that the material properties are as listed in Table 1
Given that:
• Design ESAL = 20,000,000 ESAL
• Reliability for design (R) = 95%
• Overall Standard Deviation (So)= 0.35
• Initial Serviceability Index = 4.2
• Terminal Serviceability Index = 2.2
• Drainage Modifying Factor of Base Course (m2) = 1.0 and
Factor of Sub-base Course (m3) = 1.0
• No Seasonal Variations of Subgrade Properties
Table 1. Material Properties
Materials of Pavement Approximate Resilient
CBR
Layers Modulus (MR in psi)
1. Surface
n.a. 360,000
(Asphaltic Concrete)
2. Base Course (Crushed
80 40,000
Rock)
3. Sub-base Course (Soil
25 20,000
Aggregates)
4. Sub-grade
5 6,000
(Existing Soil)
Summary of Overall Design Procedure & Steps
A. Prepare all inputs
B. Design Thickness of Surface Course (D1*)
• Use monograph to determine the structural number of Surface course (SN1)
3
2
4
1 5
SN1 = 3
C. Design Thickness of Base Course (D2*)
R = 95 %, S0 = 0.35
MR (SubBase Course) = MR (soil aggregate) = 20,000 psi
∆PSI = 4.2-2.2 = 2.0
3
2
4
1 5
SN2 = 3.6
D. Design Thickness of Sub-Base Course (D3*)
R = 95 %, S0 = 0.35
MR (subgrade) = 6,000 psi
∆PSI = 4.2-2.2 = 2.0
3
2
4
1
5
SN3 = 5.4
D1* = 20 cm
D2* = 15 cm
D3* = 25 cm
End
Question?