Project

Created by
Supplier Name

DFM (Part Name)

Sr No. Part/ Part Number Feature/ Issue Description Part Classification

(New Design/ COTS/
MOTS)

1 Mounting hole (attach image to elaborate) COTS

Mounting through Hole (attach image to

2 elaborate) COTS

3 Aligning mounting Hole with Top cover COTS

mounting cavity (attach image to elaborate)

4 Entry / Exit surface of holes (attach image to COTS

elaborate)

5 Fillet radius (attach image to elaborate) COTS

Plastic Part Uniform wall thickness issue (attach image to

6 COTS
elaborate)

7 Maximum wall thickness of cutouts (attach COTS

image to elaborate)

8 Mold wall thikness (attach image to COTS

elaborate)

Plastic Overmolding (attach image to

9 elaborate) COTS

10 Wall thickness variation (attach image to COTS

elaborate)
 Easy 1
Moderate 2
Difficult 3
Very Difficult 4
Not possible 5
Mfg Feasbility Justification for rating Raw Material Process feasibility Cost Implication
(A) availability (C) (Low/ Mediium
(B) /High

1 Constant diameter 1 1 Low

maintained throughout

Constant diameter
1 maintained throughout 1 1 Low

2 Require High dimentional 1 1 Low

accuracy

1 As hole surface are flat 1 1 Low

To reduce stress
1 concentration,Fillet radius of 1 1 Low
more than 1.5 mm given for
easy tooling

To provide high surface

2 finish and preventiing air 1 2 Low
pockets

Should not be more than 3.5

1 mm,3 mm maximum 1 1 Low
maintained
Sufficient thickness given on
all walls To provide easy
1 machinability of tool and 1 1 Low
reduce internal stresses
developed on mold to
increase mold life
Overmolding of Plastic /
2 Rubber on cavities 1 3 High

Varying fillet radius will

cause different rates of
2 material 1 1 Medium
cooling,shrinkage,warping
and distortion
Document No.
Revision 00 COTS Customised Off-th-shelf
Revision Date MOTS Modified Off-the-shelf

Acceptable score <2

Total Features 10
Average Score 1.23

Justification for High Cost Complexity Factor

[(A+B+C)/3]

1.00

1.00

1.33

1.00

1.00

1.67

1.00

1.00

1. Multiple Gating system

2. Lot of machining on mating
tooling surfaces will be 2.00
require

1.33
Total 12.33
Project Busbar Interconnection
Created by Naim
Supplier Name Bhavnish Metal

DFM (Part Name)

Sr No. Part/ Part Number Feature/ Issue Description Part Classification

(New Design/ COTS/
MOTS)

1 Hole COTS

Hole counter COTS

Tin micron COTS

RD623294
 Easy 1
Moderate 2
Difficult 3
Very Difficult 4
Not possible 5
Mfg Feasbility Justification for rating Raw Material Process feasibility Cost Implication
(A) availability (C) (Low/ Mediium
(B) /High

1 Diameter maintained by 1 1 Low

press tool

1 Diameter maintained by 1 1 Low

press tool

1 Plating tank 1 1 Low

Document No.
Revision 00 COTS Customised Off-th-shelf
Revision Date MOTS Modified Off-the-shelf

Acceptable score <2

Total Features 3
Average Score 1.00

Justification for High Cost Complexity Factor

[(A+B+C)/3]

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total 3.00