Professional Documents
Culture Documents
● The Cancun Adaptation Framework established the national adaptation plan (NAP)
process in 2010, which sets the enabling environment for “Parties to formulate and
implement national adaptation plans (NAPs) as a means of identifying medium- and
long-term adaptation needs and developing and implementing strategies and
programmes to address those needs1.”
● The NAP is a “continuous, progressive and iterative process which follows a country-
driven, gender-sensitive, participatory and fully transparent approach2.”
● The intensifying and increasingly unpredictable behavior of climate hazards requires the
Philippines to rethink its approach to managing climate induced risks. It can no longer
rely on the autonomous responses of frontline communities to enable the country to
survive and thrive over the long term.
The Framework and the Plan guide the country to prioritize adaptation as the anchor
strategy, while mitigation actions serve as a function of adaptation3.
adopted the use of the National Climate Risk Management Framework (NCRMF)
anchored on the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)5 approach. This overall risk
management scheme is meant to generate consistent metrics and quantification of risks
pursuant to global standards. This enables comparability and lends the results well to
ranking which is very important and required for prioritization of areas and sectors for
risk/impact management in a cost effective, anticipatory manner.
● The NAP, anchoring from the NCRMF, will involve three (3) pillars:
a. Risk Assessment, through the conduct of a General National PRA process in the
nature of a scanning exercise (“National Risk Scanning”) which will flow
seamlessly to the
b. Risk Management Formulation; and
c. Anticipatory Adaptation Planning and Institutionalization.
● It is anticipated that the NCRMF and NAP processes will result to the following
milestones:
o Systematic technical support to national and local stakeholders in generating,
assessing, integrating, evaluating, and applying relevant climate risk data for
climate change/resilience actions, including action and support for technology
and innovation, capacity building, and resource mobilization, especially in
averting, avoiding, minimizing loss and damage due to climate change;
o Dedicated "one stop shop" for processing and conduct of related capacity
building on climate risk data for national and local actions, through a convergent
operational structure involving relevant NGAs, academe, civil society and other
non-government actors
o Reliable and interoperable climate risk data analytics, supported by convergent
climate data infrastructure for policy, planning, budgetary, legislative, and other
development interventions across sectors and levels of governance
● The NAP will comprise of the sub-elements, namely the sectoral, sub-national
(regional) and local plans, which will constitute the bottom-up process for producing
and aggregating the inputs for the NAP.
A top-down approach will also be employed to guide and countercheck the consolidated
sectoral/sub-national and local planning results. As with the NDC, the First NAP should be in
Road Map form (2021-2050), with the required background information and data constituting
the rationale and methodology for the setting of periodic quantitative targets from current
(2021) to 2050. The NAP will have the same function as the NDC of influencing the relevant
national, sub-national and local plan for a cohesive whole.
WAYS FORWARD
5
The standard framework for the conduct of the Risk Analysis, the results of which will be the basis for the
NAP,
Climate Factsheets | July 2022
1. The NFSCC and NCCAP are due for revisiting and updating, to incorporate evidence
and learnings from past experiences, as well as adhere to recent, best available
science in view of the New Normal and need to undertake urgent actions as
prompted by the recently released Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The NCRMF should also be
incorporated into the Framework, further reiterating the strategic guidance to go
beyond “Build Back Better and Build Forward Better”, thus “Build Right at First Sight.”
3. Fast-track the conduct of the stocktake, strategic action planning with NPTE on the
top 10 climate-induced risks, and national climate risk assessment groundwork
4. Access financial and technical support and assistance for the NAP development,
including among others, GCF Readiness Funds