Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives
Project Tracker
Revision 7 Project Start Date: 1/1/2012 Project Type
Project Throughput Time (days): 180 Improvement
Review 6 Sigma Develop
Databases Data Collection Project
Project Hopper and Sponsor Role for like projects Plan for "Y" Schedule Launch Charter
Data Collection
C & E Matrix or 30 Day MBB Preliminary Plan for Key
Process Map FTA Review FMEA or FTA MSA "Xs" MBB Review
M easure
1/2/2012 1/16/2012 1/23/2012 2/6/2012 2/20/2012 2/20/2012 2/20/2012
Initial
Capability Improvements Contract
Study Multi-Vari Defined MBB Review Approval
Analyze
3/1/2012 3/26/2012 3/26/2012 3/26/2012 3/26/2012
Single or Multi Legend Completion
Factor Tests Improvements 2/3/2012 check
(DOE) Implemented MBB Review
Actual 2/1/2012
Improve completion date Planned
completion date
5/10/2012 5/10/2012 5/10/2012
Hand Off Final Project
Training/Process Final Capability Final FMEA Presentation & Project Sign-off
Control Plan Owner Sign-off Study Revised RPN MBB Review Report & Closure
Control
5/30/2012 6/11/2012 6/11/2012 6/14/2012 6/19/2012 6/19/2012 6/29/2012
Requirements Process Solution
Redesign map is calculated separately
(Use as required) VOC/VOB Analysis Redesign Design
with no dependencies on other block
Redesign dates
Cross Stakeholder
Functional Selection Discussion Stakeholder
Value Chain Process Map Matrix Guideline MBB Review Interviews MBB Review
M easure
(VOC/VOB)
1/9/2012 1/9/2012 1/16/2012 1/23/2012 1/23/2012 2/20/2012 2/20/2012
Analyze
3/5/2012 3/19/2012 3/26/2012 4/2/2012 4/9/2012 4/9/2012 4/16/2012
Improve
(Redesign)
4/30/2012 4/30/2012 5/7/2012 1/2/2012 5/28/2012 5/28/2012
Control
6/4/2012 6/11/2012 6/11/2012 6/11/2012 6/18/2012 6/25/2012
Importance to Customer
Product/Part/ Production
Customer Process Process
Service Control
Requirements Characteristics Control
Characteristics Plan
Control Plan Strategy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Process or
Prepared by:
Product Name:
OUTPUTS
Low Capacity
INPUTS
Poor Reactor
Performance
Corrosion of
Heavies in
Moisture in
Downtime
Excessive
Equipment
Responsible: FMEA Date (Orig) ______________ (Rev) ____________
From Unit
Acidity in
Lights in
Material
Product
Product
Product
Product
Losses
Process Step Process Inputs Total
Process S O D R
Step/Part E C E P
139 Day Tanks Analysis 10 10 9 9 335 Number Potential Failure Mode Potential Failure Effects V Potential Causes C Current Controls T N
9 Reactor Cat./HF Ratio 5 8 7 157 Spin Draw Fiber Breakouts Undersized package, High SD Dirty Spinneret Visual Detection of Wraps and
7 Reactor Rxr Temperature 6 5 4 7 149 Process panel-hours lost 2 8 broken Filaments 9 144
73 Lights Removal Condenser Leak 4 8 2 4 1 148 Filament motion Visual Sight-glass
74 Lights Removal Reboiler Leak 4 8 2 4 1 148 5 2 8 80
131 Purification Low Stages 8 8 144
Polymer defects Fuzzball Light
144 Final Storage Containers 3 2 6 6 140 8 2 9 144
100 Neutralization pH Value 6 6 3 138
16 Catalyst Stripper Pluggage 3 6 5 3 137
0
111 Drying Decomposition 2 6 3 2 2 134
39 Drier Water Carryover 4 6 5 1 132
34 Drier Molecular Sieve 3 3 2 7 2 125
Control Plan
Operational Excellence
Control Plan
Product: Core Team: Date (Orig):
Key Contact:
Phone: Date (Rev):
Process
Measurement %R&R Sample Sample Control
Process Process Step Input Output Specification (LSL, Cpk /Date Reaction Plan
Technique P/T Size Frequency Method
USL, Target)
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Evaluation / Sample
Process / Operation
Tools, For Char. Process Measureme Control
Number Description No. Product Process
Mfg. Class. Specification / nt Size Freq. Method
Tolerance Technique
Cummins Control Plan Form
Prototype Pre-launch Production Key Contact / Phone: Date (Orig.): Date (Rev):
Part Name / Description: Supplier / Plant Approval / Date: Customer Quality Approval / Date (if Req'd):
Supplier / Plant: Supplier Code: Other Approval / Date (if Req'd): Other Approval / Date (if Req'd):
Characteristics Methods
Process Name / Machine, Special
Part / Process
Operation Device, Jig, Char.
Number Product / Process Evaluation / Sample
Description Tools, For Mfg. Class.
No. Product Process Specification / Measurement Control Method
Size Freq.
Tolerance Technique
CFM-01-01-02-00
Control Plan Example
Manufacturing
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Sample
Process / Operation Evaluation / Reaction Plan
Tools, For Char. Process Control
Number Description
Mfg. No. Product Process Class. Specification / Measurement Size Freq. Method
Technique
Tolerance
USL = 1.8 Mills Dupont Meter,
Final Coat - Air spray guy 5 random Shutdown Assembly Line
Painting LSL = 2.0 Mills Ppk = 1.5 / April 2003 R&R = 25%, P/T = Every Hood Xbar R Chart
Thickness (Y) P/N: LAM8912 spots until resolved - John
Target = 1.9 Mills 9%
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Sample
Process / Operation Evaluation / Reaction Plan
Tools, For Char. Process Control
Number Description No. Product Process
Mfg. Class. Specification / Measurement Size Freq. Method
Technique
Tolerance
Customer Visual Read in
XYZ Loan
Response - 02 Hours Loan Form Contact Sales Manager -
Loan Apps Processing Ppk = 1.3 / April 2003 Every Loan Every Loan I-MR Chart
Turnaround Time Manimum Kappa = 1.0 / April John
System
(Y) 2003
Customer Completion of
All operators HR Employee File All involved Employee File
Loan Apps Response - Course 101 for all Quarterly Contact HR Manager - Mary
completed 100% Agreement Operators Inspection
Operator (X1) operators
Customer
Daily Computer
Response - Contact IT Manager -
Loan Apps LSL = 100% Ppk = 3.0 / April 2003 Print out. One Report Once a day I-MR Chart
Computer Uptime Elizabeth
100% Agreement
(X2)
Control Plan Development
Identify key output variables and specifications, based on customer
requirements (May use Quality Function Deployment process (QFD))
– Cause & Effect Matrix
– FMEA
Determine key/critical input variables
– Process Map
– Cause & Effect Matrix
– FMEA
– Multi-vari studies
– DOE
For each key/critical input variable determine:
– Appropriate measurement systems
– Relationship to output variables
Process
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Evaluation / Sample
Process / Operation
Tools, For Char. Process Measureme Control
Number Description No. Product Process
Mfg. Class. Specification / nt Size Freq. Method
Tolerance Technique
Process Step
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Evaluation / Sample
Process / Operation
Tools, For Char. Process Measureme Control
Number Description No. Product Process
Mfg. Class. Specification / nt Size Freq. Method
Tolerance Technique
Output Variables
Key Process Output Variables (KPOVs) should include big ―Y‖.
Critical Ys (KPOVs) may come from:
– C&E Matrix,
– FTA
– FMEA.
May contain important constraint variables
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Evaluation / Sample
Process / Operation
Tools, For Char. Process Measureme Control
Number Description No. Product Process
Mfg. Class. Specification / nt Size Freq. Method
Tolerance Technique
Input Variables
Critical Key Process Input Variables (KPIVs), Xs may come
from the Process Map, C&E Matrix, FMEA, FTA, Multi-Vari
studies, DOEs, including any uncontrollable noise variable
inputs.
For each line identify as either an input (KPIV) or output
(KPOV).
Not both!
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Evaluation / Sample
Process / Operation
Tools, For Char. Process Measureme Control
Number Description No. Product Process
Mfg. Class. Specification / nt Size Freq. Method
Tolerance Technique
Machine Devices
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Evaluation / Sample
Process / Operation
Tools, For Char. Process Measureme Control
Number Description No. Product Process
Mfg. Class. Specification / nt Size Freq. Method
Tolerance Technique
Characteristics
Number – A cross reference number from all applicable
documents (Process Map, FMEA)
Product – Features of the part, component or assembly that
are described on drawings
Process – Variables that have a Cause and Effect relationship
with the Product. (Can only be measured at the time it occurs.)
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Evaluation / Sample
Process / Operation
Tools, For Char. Process Measureme Control
Number Description No. Product Process
Mfg. Class. Specification / nt Size Freq. Method
Tolerance Technique
Special Characteristics
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Evaluation / Sample
Process / Operation
Tools, For Char. Process Measureme Control
Number Description No. Product Process
Mfg. Class. Specification / nt Size Freq. Method
Tolerance Technique
Specifications and Capability
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Part / Process Name
Device, Jig, al Product / Evaluation / Sample
Process / Operation
Tools, For Char. Process Measureme Control
Number Description No. Product Process
Mfg. Class. Specification / nt Size Freq. Method
Tolerance Technique
Sample Size and Frequency
Characteristics Methods
Machine, Speci
Device, Jig, al Product / Sample
Evaluation / Reaction Plan
Tools, For Char. Process Control
Mfg. No. Product Process Class. Specification / Measurement
Size Freq. Method
Technique
Tolerance
Factors Impacting a Good Control Plan
These need to be
Measurement Preliminary
updated before
System Analysis
proceeding
Measurement Process
System Analysis Maps Short Term
%R&R, %P/T Capability
C&E
Calibration Matrix Initial Control
Requirements Plan Assessment
FMEA
Sampling and
Testing Plans Customer
Requirements
Control Plan
Long Term
Capability Maintenance
SPC Plans
Schedules Trouble
Noise Variable Shooting
Operating Compensation Training Aids
Windows Materials
Reaction
Plans
DOEs SOPs
May already
have some of
Improvement these
Procedures
Activities
Questions for Control Plan Evaluation
Key Process Input Variables (KPIVs):
– How are they monitored?
– How often are they verified?
– Are optimum target values and specifications known?
– How much variation is there around the target value?
– What causes the variation in the KPIV?
– How often is the KPIV out of control?
– Which KPIVs should have control charts?
Uncontrollable (Noise) inputs
– What are they?
– Are they impossible or impractical to control?
– Do we know how to compensate for changes in them?
– How robust is the system to noise?
Questions for Control Plan Evaluation
(continued)
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
– Do they exist?
– Are they simple and understood?
– Are they being followed?
– Are they current?
– Is operator training performed and documented?
– Is there a process audit schedule?
Maintenance procedures
– Have critical components been identified?
– Does the schedule specify who, what and when?
– Where are the manufacturer’s instructions?
– Do we have a troubleshooting guide?
– What are the training requirements for maintenance?
Questions for Control Plan Evaluation
(continued)
Measurement procedures
– What special equipment is needed for measurement?
– What is the measurement capability?
– Who does the measurement?
– How often is a measurement taken? How is routine data
recorded?
– What key procedures are required to maintain control?
– What is done with a product that is out of spec?
– How is the process routinely audited?
– Who makes the audit?
• How often?
• How is it recorded?
Control Plan Check List
Process maps detail manufacturing Sampling, inspection and testing plans
steps, material flow and important include how often, where and to whom
variables results reported
Key product variables identified with Operating procedures identify actions,
importance to customer, desired target responsibilities, maintenance schedules
value and specification range defined and product segregation requirements
Long and short term capability trend Training materials describe all aspects
charts track variation reduction progress
of process operation and responsibilities
Key and critical input variables identified
Applicable version of TS16949,
with targets, statistically determined ISO9001, ISO14000 met if required
control limits and control strategies Process improvement efforts fully
defined documented and available for reference
Reaction plan in place for out-of-spec Control plan is reviewed and updated
material quarterly and resides in the operating
Measurement systems are capable with area
calibration requirements specified
Exercise #1 - Part 1
Exercise #1 - Part 2
Exercise-
Develop a Control Plan
Break into groups
Select a process from one group member´s project
Develop a control plan for this process within 15
minutes
Record output on flipchart
Two groups will be randomly chosen to report
Control Plan Hints