Model Permission Model Owner Pros Cons Copyright link Model link Contact details More

type Source Source info

EPIC NOT for Software | EPIC
commercial & APEX
use Models
(tamu.edu)
GEPIC NOT for Eawag - Swiss
commercial Federal Institute
use of Aquatic
Science and
Technology -
Eawag
IMAGE Free to use, agro- Netherland -does not consider Copyright | PBL Download packages - IMAGE-info@pbl.nl 1, 2
provided ecological Environmenta stresses related to N Netherlands IMAGE (pbl.nl)
we source zone l Assessment -output is potential Environmental
them model Agency (PBL) rather than actual Assessment
yields* Agency
-least variation in yields
LPJ- NOT for LPJ-GUESS
GUESS commercial home page at
use Lund University
LPJmL Free to use agro- Potsdam -does not consider LPJmL/LICENSE LPJmL - Lund- Kirsten.Thonicke@pik- 3456
ecosystem Institute for stresses related to N at master · PIK- Potsdam-Jena potsdam.de and
model Climate LPJmL/LPJmL · managed Land — christoph.mueller@pik-
Impact GitHub Potsdam Institute for potsdam.de
Research Climate Impact
(PIK) Research (pik-
potsdam.de)
DSSAT Free to use site-based - Considers N How To Use the Request | DSSAT Contact Us - DSSAT.net 78
crop and O2 stress Model - Foundation
models DSSAT.net
PEGASU Cannot find agro- Tyndall -largest Link to main paper d.deryng@uea.ac.uk or 9
S access to ecosystem Centre UEA regional delphine.deryng@mail.mcgill.c
the model model variation in a
itself simulated
yields
- considers N,
phosphorus and
potassium
stress
iFEED 18 May NOT iFEED - A iFEED - A Climate
models use for Climate Smart Smart Food System
 used by commercial Food System Policy Pathway Tool
Leeds purposes Policy Pathway (leeds.ac.uk)
Universit Tool
y (leeds.ac.uk)

*Potential yields - best suited to studies that are designed to advance scientific understanding of the plant-atmosphere processes being represented and
their sensitivity to climatic stresses, rather than for economic forecasts or sensitivity to soil edaphic conditions

The OECD-Agricultural Outlook 2020-2029, which leverages FAO GAEZ data, was leveraged in the qualitative assessment of the opportunity around
supporting sustainable crop production. The tool itself was not used though. They leveraged the GGCMI (Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison)
dataset for a qualitative description of risks early on and used SPAM (Spatial Production Allocation Model) to map MDLZ’s crop sourcing within sourcing
countries.

More info sources:

1: Leemans, R. and A.M. Solomon (1993) Modeling the potential change in yield and distribution of the earth’s crops under a warmed climate. Climate
Research 3:79-96.

2: Bouwman A.F., T. Kram, T. Klein, and K. Goldewijk (Eds.). (2006) Integrated Modelling of Global Environmental Change. An Overview of IMAGE 2.4. PBL
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.

3: Bondeau, A., et al. (2007) Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Global Change Biology 13:679–706,
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x

4: Fader, M., et al. (2010), Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: Present and potential future patterns, Journal of Hydrology, 384, 218-231.

5: Waha, K., et al. (2012) Climate-driven simulation of global crop sowing dates. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21:247-259.

6: Schaphoff, S., U. Heyder, S. Ostberg, D. Gerten, J. Heinke, and W. Lucht (2013) Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget,
Environmental Research Letters. in press.
7: Elliott, J., M. Glotter, N. Best, D. Kelly, M. Wilde, and I. Foster (2013). The Parallel System for Integrating Impact Models and Sectors (pSIMS). Accepted for
publication in the Proceedings of the 2013 XSEDE Conference.

8: Jones, J.W., et al. (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur. J. Agron. 18:235-265.

9: Deryng, D., W.J. Sacks, C.C. Barford, N. Ramankutty (2011) Simulating the effects of climate and agricultural management practices on global crop yield.
Global Biogeochem. Cycles 25(2) (/doi/10.1002/gbc.v25.2/issuetoc).