Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Catatan 00

    Uploaded by

    Aulia Ramadhan
    6 views1 page
    This document is the authors' reply to a discussion of their previous paper on analyzing modified isochronal tests to predict the stabilized deliverability potential of gas wells without using stabilized flow. The discussion introduced the concept of "pseudostabilization time" which is different than traditional definitions of stabilization time. While the discussed method seemed straightforward, it appeared contradictory from the perspective of traditional stabilization time definitions. The authors analyze the different stabilization definitions and intend to address specific ideas from the discussion, including that the discussed method does not directly calculate permeability or skin effect, but that these values could actually be obtained from the data presented.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    catatan 00

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is the authors' reply to a discussion of their previous paper on analyzing modified isochronal tests to predict the stabilized deliverability potential of gas wells without using stabilized flow. The discussion introduced the concept of "pseudostabilization time" which is different than traditional definitions of stabilization time. While the discussed method seemed straightforward, it appeared contradictory from the perspective of traditional stabilization time definitions. The authors analyze the different stabilization definitions and intend to address specific ideas from the discussion, including that the discussed method does not directly calculate permeability or skin effect, but that these values could actually be obtained from the data presented.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Catatan 00

    Uploaded by

    Aulia Ramadhan
    This document is the authors' reply to a discussion of their previous paper on analyzing modified isochronal tests to predict the stabilized deliverability potential of gas wells without using stabilized flow. The discussion introduced the concept of "pseudostabilization time" which is different than traditional definitions of stabilization time. While the discussed method seemed straightforward, it appeared contradictory from the perspective of traditional stabilization time definitions. The authors analyze the different stabilization definitions and intend to address specific ideas from the discussion, including that the discussed method does not directly calculate permeability or skin effect, but that these values could actually be obtained from the data presented.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Authors' Reply to Discussion of The Analysis of Modified

    Isochronal Tests To Predict the Stabilized Deliverability


    Potential of Gas Wells Without Using Stabilized Flow

    In his discussion of the Brar and Aziz paper, I Poettmann 2 introduces a simple idea for calculating
    the stabilized flow potential of a gas well from isochronal data. He introduces the concept of a time
    to "pseudostabilization, tps ," which is different from the time to stabilization known as ts or tpss
    (time to pseudosteady state). 4 Poettmann's method of calculation is straightforward, simple, and
    apparently correct. When viewed from the perspective of the time to stabilization (as traditionally
    defined), however, this method appeared to be contradictory and confusing, and yet hard to refute.
    After considerable analysis and comparison of the various definitions of stabilization, we wish to
    present a reply to Poettmann's discussion. We shall first address some specific ideas discussed by
    Poettmann and then expound on his main idea.

    Dalam pembahasannya tentang makalah Brar dan Aziz, I Poettmann 2 memperkenalkan ide
    sederhana untuk menghitung potensial aliran stabil dari sumur gas dari data isokronal. Dia
    memperkenalkan konsep waktu untuk "pseudostabilization, tps," yang berbeda dari waktu untuk
    stabilisasi yang dikenal sebagai ts atau tpss (waktu untuk keadaan tetap semu).4 Metode
    perhitungan Poettmann sangat lugas, sederhana, dan tampaknya benar. Namun, jika dilihat dari
    perspektif waktu menuju stabilisasi (sebagaimana didefinisikan secara tradisional), metode ini
    tampak kontradiktif dan membingungkan, namun sulit untuk dibantah. Setelah banyak analisis
    dan perbandingan dari berbagai definisi stabilisasi, kami ingin menyajikan jawaban atas diskusi
    Poettmann. Kami pertama-tama akan membahas beberapa ide spesifik yang dibahas oleh
    Poettmann dan kemudian menguraikan ide utamanya.

    Poettmann's method does not involve the direct calculation of permeability, k, or skin effect, s. In
    fact, in his example and footnote, he used the value of k from Brar and Aziz' s paper. I In reality, both
    k and s could have been obtained from his Fig. 1. From his Eq. 2, it is obvious that the slope of the
    line of the a vs. log t plot (his Fig. 1) can be used to calculate k and the intercept used to calculate s.
    Thus

    Metode Poettmann tidak melibatkan perhitungan langsung permeabilitas, k, atau efek kulit, s.
    Bahkan, dalam contoh dan catatan kakinya, dia menggunakan nilai k dari makalah Brar dan Aziz. I
    Pada kenyataannya, k dan s dapat diperoleh dari Gambar 1. Dari Persamaannya. 2, jelas bahwa
    kemiringan garis plot a vs. log t (Gambar 1) dapat digunakan untuk menghitung k dan intersep
    digunakan untuk menghitung s. Jadi

    You might also like