Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study
The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement (2005), conducted a meta-
analysis on teacher leadership in small scale qualitative studies over the past two decades. The
participants ranged from research and studies that described teacher leadership practice, it’s
characteristics, and promotion of teacher leadership. Teacher leadership is simply defined as
three major foci, including individual development, team development, and organizational
development. The findings were that teacher leaders can be fostered with the right school
culture, roles, and structures. It was also found that some challenges that may become obstacles
for teacher leaders include inadequate time for collaboration, learning, and leading, lack of
incentives, and egalitarian norms in school culture. Many other challenges may also include
hierarchical relationships, lack of teacher input, uncertainty, and traditional top-down
leadership structures. Suggestions to better the fostering of teacher leaders include overall
school improvement and traditional forms of management must be modified. Final conclusions
were inconclusive due to lacking high quality research and consistent definitions of “teacher
leadership” and what it entails.
These two articles suggest that teacher leadership is something that is essential for schools,
students, and education as a whole. Both articles were very different, as one was an actual study
of actual participants over the course of a few years, whereas the second article was a review of
multiple qualitative studies over the past 20 years. The first article, where the author Will
discussed Ingersoll’s study, recommends that teachers need to be more involved with decision
making when it comes to student success and expectations. However, The Center for
Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement focuses their review on how teacher
leadership can be fostered by the overall modification of school culture, structures, and
resources. Both of these articles go hand in hand because both concepts are essential to produce
and encourage more teacher leaders to come out into the light, rather than stay in the dark.