You are on page 1of 3

Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 159 – 161

Design of a non-homogeneous diamond bit matrix


Huadong Ding a,*, Yawen Li b, Xiaohua Yang c, Hongqi Hao c, Zhihao Jin c
a
Surface Engineering Research Institute of CMES, 21 Dujiakan, Beijing 100072, People’s Republic of China
b
Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, CAS, Shanghai 200050, People’s Republic of China
c
State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Beha6iour of Materials, Xi’an Jiaotong Uni6ersity, Xi’an 710049, People’s Republic of China

Received 3 June 1997

Abstract

The design method for a non-homogeneous diamond bit matrix is given according to the rule that the matrix must be suited
to the rock formation to be drilled. The non-homogeneous matrix can extend the bit to suit the objects to be drilled and self-adjust
the exposure of the diamond in the bit during the drilling process. © 1998 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Matrix; Diamond drilling; Diamond bit; Powder metallurgy; Exploration engineering

1. Introduction 2. Present matrix design method

Used to enclose the diamond and connect with the The matrix material is a multi-phase alloy or psedo-
blank, the diamond bit matrix is the key to bit quality. alloy composed of a skeleton such as WC and bonding
With impregnated bits, during the drilling process the metals such as Cu, Ni, Co, etc. The wear resistance of
cutting and the drilling fluid produce an erosive action the matrix depends mainly on the properties and con-
on the matrix, exposing the diamond accordingly to cut tent of the skeleton material and the sintering process.
the rock. To obtain a satisfactory drilling effect, the The bonding metals have the effect of bonding the
matrix must be suited to the rock formation to be skeleton to the matrix, holding the diamond within the
drilled. Thus the drillability of the rock must be known skeleton, and connecting it with the blank.
to provide the basis for the design of the bit matrix. Up to now the determination of the wear resistance
As is known, different rocks have different drillabili- of the matrix still follows the method as described in
ties. The drillabilities of the same kind of rock, but of [1], which was promulgated as the ‘‘Preliminary Stan-
different origins, are not necessarily the same, and can dard for Testing and Classifying the Abrasive Resis-
even differ greatly. Most matrix materials currently in tance of Bit Matrix’’ within the Ministry of Geology
use are designed for rocks of specific origin, thus result- and Mineral Resources. The Amsler abrasiveness test-
ing in poor suitability. ing machine is used to simulate the abrading process of
In this paper, considering the characteristics of dia- the rock on the matrix during drilling. The weighted
mond bit manufacture and following the principle that mean wearing rate with the measurement precision
the matrix must be suited to the rock formation to be exponent n being the weight, MGP, indicates the abra-
drilled, a new concept, a non-homogeneous bit matrix, sive resistance of the matrix [1,2]. The lower is MGP, the
is proposed. This will not only extend the range of greater is the abrasive resistance. The experimental
application of the bit for the rock to be drilled, but will result was verified in exploration practice. Table 1 lists
also give self-adjustment of the extent of exposure of the MGP values of 6 representative matrixes.
the diamond during drilling. Fig. 1 illustrates the suitability of the matrix for the
drilled rock [2]. In Fig. 1a, with a proper wearing rate
of the matrix, the diamond is exposed normally. In Fig.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 010 66719299; fax: + 86 010 1b, the matrix wears faster, so that the bit loses its
66717145; e-mail: Zhang Weil8@hotmail.com drilling ability earlier and the diamond drops off: al-

0924-0136/98/$ - see front matter © 1998 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
PII S0924-0136(98)00092-2
160 H. Ding et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 159–161

though it can still cut the rock, the drilling ability of the
bit is not brought into full play. Further, the broken
diamond and the cutting wear the matrix, forming a
vicious circle and shortening the service life of the bit.
Contrarily, if the matrix wears too slowly to expose the
diamond, the micro-cutting action loses effect, thus
resulting in low drilling efficiency and a belly-mouthed
tendency for the bit, as shown in Fig. 1c: in extreme
cases, the bit will ‘slip’.
From the above analysis, in the design of the bit
matrix, the drillability of the rock should be known
prior to the determination of MGP of the matrix accord-
ing to the principle that the matrix must be suited to
the rock formation to be drilled. The MGP value of the
matrix can meet the requirements by selecting the skele- Fig. 2. A non-homogeneous bit crown.
ton material, the proportion of the skeleton to the
bonding metals, and the corresponding manufacture matrix, was advanced to improve the present design
process. Due to measurement error, it is impossible to method, i.e. fan-shaped matrixes with different wear
obtain an exact MGP for the rock to be drilled. From resistance are used on the one bit. As seen in Fig. 2,
the analysis of the drilling principle of the bit, deviation there are six fan-shaped matrixes in the bit crown,
of the matrix MGP from the value for the rock will which are divided into group A, group B, and group C
result in problems as shown in Fig. 1b and c. In other from the symmetry principle. The corresponding MGP
words, the above phenomena always exist to some values are MGPA, MGPS, MGPC, with MGPA B MGPB B
extent in practice. MGPC.
For a masonry diamond bit, because of its ever- Suppose that the group B matrixes suit the rock
changing drilling, even the corresponding MGP values
formation to be drilled, then the wear resistance of the
cannot be determined. For example, in construction
group A matrixes seems lower, whilst that of the group
engineering, it is very probable that the same bit has to
C matrixes seems higher. The drilling principle is as
drill brick, reinforced concrete, marble, and granite.
follows: when the group B matrixes achieve the ideal
This poses a challenge in the present method of design
drilling effect, the group A matrixes wear faster because
of the matrix.
of their lower wear resistance; but the existence of the
group C matrixes prevents the group A matrixes from
following the vicious cycle in Fig. 1, and the whole bit
3. New design method: a non-homogeneous matrix can drill properly. If the group A matrixes suit the
rock, the groups B and C matrixes have a higher wear
To extend the range of applications of the bit to the resistance. The group A matrixes drill normally and
drilled objects, a new concept, a non-homogeneous bit produce cuttings to wear the groups B and C matrixes,
thus avoiding the problem in Fig. 1c: in this case, the
Table 1 bit can still perform normally except that the drilling
The MGP values of six representative matrixes efficiency is slightly lower compared with a bit com-
Matrix No. 204 807 63 804 8106 35
posed entirely of group A matrixes. If the group C
MGP 0.11 0.36 0.62 0.88 1.02 2.03 matrixes suit the rock and achieve the ideal drilling
effect, the groups A and B matrixes will wear faster, but
the existence of the group C matrixes prevents the
groups A and B matrixes from following the phe-
nomenon in Fig. 1b: the service life of the bit is
nevertheless influenced to some extent. It should be
noted that the differences amongst MGPA, MGPB, and
MGPC should not be too large: their exact values can be
determined from the application requirement and prac-
tical experience.
Fig. 1. Relationship between the diamond exposure and the matrix Under a fixed load capacity when drilling, the above
properties: (a) the matrix wears properly, the diamonds are exposed
normally; (b) the matrix wears quickly, the diamonds easily break or
design method shows clear superiority. Assume the
drop off; and (c) the matrix wears slowly, the diamonds are not exerted drilling force to be 3P, when the group A
exposed. matrixes suit the rock, they wear faster than the groups
H. Ding et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 159–161 161

B and C matrixes. Thus the force exerted on A is lower at all, the belly-mouthed bit not performing normally
than P and the force exerted on B or C is higher than under the drilling force. Using bits made by the new
P. This makes B and C increase their drilling efficiency design method, normal drilling could be maintained,
and speeds up to their abrasion. As soon as the worn the average drilling efficiency was more than twice that
height of B reaches the same as that of A, the force of the other bits and the service life showed an increase
exerted on A, B, and C returns to P. During the drilling of 50%. A better effect has also been achieved for
process, frequently changing the forces exerted on the geological core bits designed by the new method.
three groups will avoid the decrease of drilling effi-
ciency mentioned above.
4. Conclusions
For masonry bits, their range of application and
drilling efficiency are greater, thus it is necessary to From the point of exploration engineering and metal
increase the difference between MGPB and MGPC. materials, and from practical experience, a new method
The following measures can be taken in the non-ho- of matrix design was proposed to extend the range of
mogeneous matrix design: (i) adjust the skeleton materi- applications of the bit to the material to be drilled.
als of the different matrixes, for example, with the same Better drilling effects were achieved when this new
content, WC has much lower wear resistance than design was used in masonry diamond bits as well as in
W2C; (ii) adjust the relative content between the skele- geological core bits. Nevertheless, the new method
ton and the bonding metals of the matrix; and (iii) needs gradual adjustment and modification in practice
choose diamonds with different grain sizes or with to achieve the ideal effect.
different compositions for the different matrixes.
On a particular site, a comparative test was carried
out for drilling high-grade reinforced concrete. Using References
conventional bits with a homogeneous matrix, they
[1] H. Ding, Wear resistance test of powder metallurgy matrix
either wore quickly and were thus short-lived for a materials, Hunan Metall. 5 (1989) 21 (in Chinese).
higher MGP matrix; or for a lower MGP matrix the [2] G. Liu, Diamond Drilling Handbook, Geological Publishing
drilling efficiency was low and the bit did not even drill House, Beijing, 1991.

You might also like