Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
One of the most confusing aspects of coated steel sheet products are coating weight designations and what
they mean, particularly with respect to product performance. This article is intended to clarify this issue.
If what we are interested in is the coating thickness, why do ASTM COATING WEIGHT MEASUREMENT
standards not use thickness measurements? The answer is simply There is a very precise on-line
that it is difficult to directly measure the thickness accurately and technique for measuring coating
repeatedly. For example, a G90 coating contributes about 1.6 mils thickness. The equipment required is
expensive, uses sophisticated x-ray or
(0.0016 inches, or about 42 microns) to the total thickness of the radioisotope fluorescence devices,
coated sheet. For a coating equally applied to both sides of the sheet, and requires considerable expertise to
this means there is about 0.0008 inches (21 microns) of zinc on each operate. These gauges repeatedly
surface. To accurately determine the thickness of the coating, the sense the coating thickness on each
surface, average a large number of
coated thickness must be measured, the coating stripped off, and readings, and then convert the results
then the steel substrate thickness measured using a gauge capable into the more familiar coating weight
of accurately reading to the nearest ten-thousandth of an inch. This values. Laboratory versions of this
is extremely difficult to do with good accuracy. On-line equipment is equipment are also available. Refer to
ASTM Test Method A754/A754M for
available that can nondestructively do this (see sidebar), but the most more information. These gauges
representative manual method of determining the amount of coating require calibration based on weigh-
present is to measure its weight [mass] on a larger and given surface strip-weigh testing.
area using the “weigh-strip-weigh” technique. Weigh-strip-weigh
refers to the procedure of weighing a standard size sample of the product using a very accurate scale,
stripping the coating in an inhibited acid without removing any of the substrate, then reweighing the coupon
to determine the weight [mass] loss. This is the original method of determining coating weight [mass], and,
in fact, is still the referee method used to check and calibrate nondestructive on-line and laboratory coating
thickness gauges. There are weigh-strip-weigh procedures that can be used for all zinc-based coatings in
commercial production today. For the most common products, these procedures are defined in ASTM
1
Weight is a measure of the pull of the force of gravity (Weight/Force = Mass x Acceleration of gravity)
2
Mass is a fundamental property – the same everywhere
3
For the purpose of measuring metallic coatings, mass and weight are equivalent everywhere on earth
GalvInfo Center email: info@galvinfo.com Toll-free phone: 1-888-880-8802
1
GalvInfoNote 1.1
Rev 4.0 Dec 2020
Standard A90/A90M, and cover galvanized and galvannealed sheet, 55% aluminum-zinc alloy-coated
sheet, zinc-5% aluminum alloy-coated sheet, and zinc-aluminum-magnesium alloy-coated sheet. There are
special procedures required for other types of alloy coatings such as aluminized, and zinc-nickel alloy
electroplated sheet. These are covered by other ASTM standards.
The 1.25 oz coating on hand dipped sheets was sometimes not very adherent because of its thickness and chemistry, limiting
application to end uses that involved only mild forming. Such a thick coating was much more than was needed for most
applications, plus the zinc cost was an appreciable portion of the sheet selling price, especially for thin sheet. In the 1930s
the sheet galvanizing process began migrating to the continuous method with its higher production rate and improved
wiping methods. At the processing speeds used it was, and still is, very difficult to successfully apply 1.25 ounces of zinc
on each surface of thin sheet. At about the same time, the industry learned that a small amount of aluminum in the zinc
bath markedly improved zinc adhesion. Manufacturers saw an opportunity, so began producing coated sheet with lower
coating weights, which reduced production costs, resulted in a much more formable coating, yet provided adequate
corrosion protection for the markets that did not need thick coatings.
The most common of the original thinner coatings was labeled “1.25 Commercial”, which aimed at minimum 0.90 oz/ft2,
split between both sides. In 1964 such coatings were formally standardized in ASTM specification A525 General
Requirements for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process. Coating Class “1.25 Commercial”
became Coating Designation “G90”, with a specified minimum weight of 0.90 oz/ft2, total both sides. The coating class
known as “Light Commercial” became Coating Designation “G60”. Coating Class “2.50” (equivalent to the original 1.25
per side coating) became Coating Designation “G210”.
The above short history explains the origin and meaning of “1.25 Commercial” coating, which even today is occasionally
referred to in the marketplace, as are gauge numbers. It is important to remember that “1.25 Commercial” has not existed
since the late 1950s, andgauge numbers were never regulated and did not refer to only one thickness, but instead to a range
of thicknesses.
1 Steel Sheet Facts 10, Steel Gauges and Thicknesses, Canadian Steel Sheet Building Institute, September 2012,
http://cssbi.ca/assets/resources/Fact_Sheets/CSSBI-Facts10-12.pdf
2
GalvInfoNote 1.1
Rev 4.0 Dec 2020
• Narrow sheet cut from full-width sheet is subject only to a minimum SST, TBS requirement
• With the exception of supplementary Table S2.1 in A653/A653M, ASTM specifications state that
the minimum weight on one side of a single spot is normally not less than 40% of the
minimum TBS requirement
• Examples of full-width pass/fail test results for A653 are given below
Table 1 Example G90 Coating Weight Results - Illustrating Passing and Failing the Requirements
of A653/A653M (Table 1) – values in oz/ft2
1 This value is marginally below the aim of ‘normally not less than’ 40 % (0.32 oz/ft2) of the SST-TBS value of 0.80 oz/ft2 on
any one side of a G90 SST. Production coating weight [mass] data should be reviewed to determine if there is a need for
retesting before the product can be approved.
3
GalvInfoNote 1.1
Rev 4.0 Dec 2020
Examples are:
60G 70G 90G
These designations specify the minimum and maximum SST value on each surface, e.g., 60G requires a
minimum of 60 g/m2 and a maximum of 110 g/m2 of zinc on each surface for any SST.
When specifying single side single spot coatings, the designation for each surface must be shown, e.g.,
60G60G.
Coating weight [mass] versus coating life – For galvanized coatings in most applications
and environments, the corrosion performance is an approximate linear function of coating
weight (thickness). For instance, a G60 coating has twice the thickness of a G30 coating, and
the life of the product (defined, perhaps, as the time to 5% red rust) in a given environment is
approximately twice as long. Similarly, a G90 coating is approximately 50% thicker than a G60
coating, and thus would be expected to perform 50% better (in terms of time to 5% red rust).
For a more thorough discussion on service life, see GalvInfoNote 3.1. Limits on maximum
acceptable coating weights for an application are usually determined by other factors such as
cost or formability. For a more thorough discussion of this topic see GalvInfoNotes 1.6 and 2.5.
For other metallic-coated sheet products, the life versus coating thickness is typically not linear;
thus determining the coating weight [mass] to use is not as simple as it is for galvanized
coatings. Also, when these products are painted, the behaviour is even more complex. The
subject of painted hot-dip products is addressed in GalvInfoNotes 4.1 and 4.2.
Zinc-Iron (Galvanneal) – The common inch-pound coating weight designations (ordered as A653) for
galvannealed sheet (zinc-iron alloy-coated) are, in oz/ft2:
A25 A40 A60
As with galvanized product designators, A40 for example, requires a minimum average TST coating weight
of 0.40 oz/ft2, total-both-sides. While the coating contains approximately 8 to 10% iron, resulting in the
density being slightly higher than a zinc coating and the coating thickness being slightly less than a G40
galvanize coating, the difference is too small to be of concern. The effect of density is discussed in the
section on 55% Al-Zn coatings, and in GalvInfoNote 1.10. Also, see GalvInfoNote 1.3 for a full explanation
of hot-dip galvanneal coatings.
The SI equivalent coating mass designations (ordered as A653M) for galvannealed sheet are, in g/m2:
ZF75 ZF120 ZF180
ZF120, for example, requires a minimum average TST of 120 g/m2 total-both-sides.
As with galvanize, the option of ordering zinc-iron coatings to single side, SST coating designations has
been added to A653/A653M. Again, these are SI designations only (ordered to A653M), specifying the
minimum and maximum allowable coating mass per side for any single spot, and taking the familiar form of
automotive coating designations (numeric characters first – signifying a per side requirement). No inch-
pound designations are used since single side coatings are traditionally ordered in SI units only. Examples
are:
45A 50A
These designations relate to the minimum and maximum SST value on each surface, e.g., 45A requires a
minimum of 45 g/m2 and a maximum of 75 g/m2 of zinc-iron alloy on each surface for any SST.
When specifying single side, SST coatings, the designation for each surface must be shown, e.g., 45A45A.
………………………
4
GalvInfoNote 1.1
Rev 4.0 Dec 2020
For galvanized and galvannealed sheet, the three-significant figure relationship between coating weight
[mass] and thickness (based on zinc density of 446 lb/ft3 [7140 kg/m3]) is:
5
GalvInfoNote 1.1
Rev 4.0 Dec 2020
nnZnnZ A879 Zinc - EG oz/ft2 Min & Max NONE NONE NONE
nnGnnG A879M Zinc - EG g/m2 Min & Max NONE NONE NONE
nnGnnG A653 M – Table S2.1 Zinc - HD g/m2 Min & Max NONE NONE NONE
nnAnnA A653 M – Table S2.1 Zinc-iron - HD g/m2 Min & Max NONE NONE NONE
nnGnnG Auto (typical) 1 Zinc - HD & EG g/m2 Min & Max NONE NONE NONE
nnAnnA Auto (typical) 2 Zinc-iron - HD & EG g/m2 Min & Max NONE * NONE NONE
Notes: nn = numerals (2 or 3) specific to coating weight [mass]
HD = Hot-Dip
EG = Electrogalvanize
SST = Single Spot Test
TST = Triple Spot Test
* some auto manufacturers require a minimum TST
For additional clarification, see Table 3 below, which provides the requirements of selected coating weight
[mass] examples for galvanized sheet made to ASTM specifications.
It is not easy to keep the terminology straight. Users should be aware that both units are in common use
today, and are advised to pay close attention when ordering, knowing precisely what is meant by the
terminology being used. See the Table 4 at the end of this article, which summarizes the designations used
for most hot-dip products, and may be useful in keeping terminology clear.
6
GalvInfoNote 1.1
Rev 4.0 Dec 2020
7
GalvInfoNote 1.1
Rev 4.0 Dec 2020
Figure 1
HOT-DIP GALVANIZED SHEET
COATING THICKNESS ILLUSTRATOR
(Information only - not for determining equivalency)
G115
2.0
ASTM A653 - Table 1
1.8 Coating Weight Designations
Displayed as G90
Coating Thickness - Mils
1.2 G60
8
GalvInfoNote 1.1
Rev 4.0 Dec 2020
Because 55% Al-Zn alloy coating and a galvanize coating behave quite differently with respect to corrosion
processes, drawing a performance equivalency curve is not possible. There is no answer, therefore, to the
question: What 55% Al-Zn alloy coating is equivalent in performance to a G90 coating? The major use of
55% Al-Zn alloy coated sheet is for construction industry building panels, and for this application the most
common coating weights are AZ50 [AZM150] and AZ55 [AZM165]. As the differences in performance
between these two designators are subtle, ask your supplier which coating thickness is recommended for
your application.
For 55% Al-Zn alloy-coated sheet there is also a SI coating mass designator system (ordered as A792M).
The SI equivalents to AZ50, AZ55, AZ60 and AZ70 are, in g/m2:
AZM150 AZM165 AZM180 AZM210
These designations specify the minimum average of a TST, total-both-sides, per A924/A924M, e.g.,
AZM150 requires a minimum TST of 150 g/m2 total-both-sides.
Since 55% Al-Zn alloy-coated sheet is produced only by the hot-dip process, there is no additional
terminology or specification related to the manufacture of an electroplated product. Also, there are no SST,
single side designations for this product.
For 55% Al-Zn alloy-coated sheet, the three-significant figure relationship between coating weight [mass]
and thickness (based on an alloy density of 234 lb/ft3 [3750 kg/m3]) is:
See GalvInfoNote 1.4 for a complete description of 55% Al-Zn alloy-coated sheet.
For Zn-5% Al alloy-coated sheet, the three-significant figure relationship between coating weight [mass]
and thickness (based on an alloy density of 427 lb/ft3 [6840 kg/m3]) is:
9
GalvInfoNote 1.1
Rev 4.0 Dec 2020
Type 1 – 5 to 9% Al; 2 to 4% Mg: 1.00 oz/ft2 = 0.00200 in = 305 g/m2 = 0.0508 mm (4)
– 9 to 13% Al; 2 to 4% Mg: 1.00 oz/ft2 = 0.00210 in = 305 g/m2 = 0.0533 mm (5)
Type 2 – 3 to <5% Al; 2 to 4% Mg: 1.00 oz/ft2 = 0.00195 in = 305 g/m2 = 0.0495 mm (6)
Type 3 – 3 to 6% Al; 0.4 to <2% Mg: 1.00 oz/ft2 = 0.00187 in = 305 g/m2 = 0.0475 mm (7)
Type 4 – 0.5 to <3% Al; 0.4 to 2.6% Mg: 1.00 oz/ft2 = 0.00181 in = 305 g/m2 = 0.0460 mm (8)
Type 5 – 0.5 to 3% Al; 2.6 to 4% Mg: 1.00 oz/ft2 = 0.00193 in = 305 g/m2 = 0.0490 mm (9)
10
GalvInfoNote 1.1
Rev 4.0 Dec 2020
Summary
This article explains the complexities of coating designation systems and hopefully provides a better
understanding of why it is important to be sure that you and your supplier are speaking the same language.
Table 4 gives examples of some of the designators discussed above. See GalvInfoNote 1.10 for an
explanation of how coatings affect the metrics of coated steel sheet products.
* Not Applicable
++
Single side designators are used to specify the coating mass for each side and are written, for example, 60G60G, or in the
case of differential coating masses, 90G60G.
Disclaimer:
Articles, research reports, and technical data are provided for information purposes only. Although the publishers endeavor to
provide accurate, timely information, the International Zinc Association does not warrant the research results or information reported
in this communication and disclaims all liability for damages arising from reliance on the research results or other information
contained in this communication, including, but not limited to, incidental or consequential damages.
11