You are on page 1of 5

HELPING PROCESS IN is “processing” in his mind the

information he has been getting,


SOCIAL WORK WITH thinking about who will be in which
GROUPS group, what problem or concern will be
likely addressed, and what activities
may have to be undertaken.)

Helping Process in Social Work with Groups GROUP COMPOSITION


Beginning Phase: 1.1 selection of members (based on
1. Assessment compatibility or complementarity and not
2. Planning identity
1.2 size of the group (4 to 15 more or
Middle Phase less)
1. Plan Implementation

Ending Phase 2. GROUP FORMATION


1. Evaluation Should discuss the following impt matters:
2. Termination  Common group concern/problem
 Norms and rules
 Schedule and venue of group sessions
PRE-GROUP FORMATION  Group goals
Conceptualizing the Group Service 1. members’ perspectives ( own views,
Announcing the Group Service and recruiting perceptions, motivations needs, and
members purposes of individual members)
Preparing Logistics 2. worker’s perspectives
Enlisting community support 3. group system perspective: Group Goals
“Group system goals” according to Schopler
Individual Focused Assessment and Planning and Galinsky
 Involves information gathering and
information-gathering and analysis
towards an understanding and PROGRAM MEDIA
consequently a definition of the need or
 Refers to the activities , verbal or non-
problem of the client
verbal which the group engages in for
 Pre-group Interviews/Intake – done the purpose of achieving its goals
prior to group formation.
Uses of program media:
Individual client’s profile: (should contain
 Modify or change attitudes and
the following information)
behavior
 Name and other basic identifying
 Promote individual values such as
information
emotional and intellectual growth
 Need(s)/concerns/problems relevant to
 Influence group climate
the group program
 Promote group interaction, etc.
 Strengths/resources and limitations, if
any
 Worker’s observations /comments PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
 Refers to all activities, worker
Case Assessment/Problem Definition
intervention and group action which
the group system directs towards
Referred to as “social study” , “social
the achievement of goals (Boehm)
diagnosis”, “problem definition”,. And
“assessment” - as a process and a product of
EVALUATION
understanding on which action is based.
Can mean any of the following:
 Regular or periodic – meaning on-
ACTION-PLANNING
going evaluation of actions taken
Is based on assessment and is the outcome of
during plan implementation
assessment
 Terminal evaluation – follows
Includes the following steps: implementation and is done primarily
a) Formulating goals to assess the outcome of the helping
b) Establishing specific helping plans efforts
 Summative evaluation – evaluation
Group-Focused Assessment and Planning that is concerned with outcomes or
 group level assessment and planning effectiveness;
may be said to start even before the
group is convened. (because as the  Formative evaluation - evaluation
worker does the pre-group interviews that is concerned with looking at the
with each prospective group member, he process of the work.

1
Records as evaluation tools: of the approach: self- direction
> The following are records that the group toward a common goal is the most
worker must write and keep: effective vehicle for the social
1. pre-group /intake interviews growth of its members.
2. Individual case assessments  People are not seen as being sick or
3. Statements to group concerns/problems, healthy, but on a scale ranging from
group goals and plans (for group in- -
session and extra-group session)  socially functional (adequate), to
4. Attendance records dysfunctional (inadequate), to
5. Process or summary recordings of group  eufunctional (optimum)…
sessions continually able to move up this
6. Records of marginal interviews (i.e. scale in a life-long developmental
interviews with members outside group process of self-realization.
sessions)
7. Records of collateral interviews / BASIC CHARACTERISTICS:
interviews with “significant others” 1. It is humanistic. The worker and group
8. Evaluation records (i.e, individuals, share one over-riding characteristic –
group) common human condition; the group’s
9. Transfer /closing summaries common purpose and integrity as a group
are respected by the worker.
2. It is phenomenological. Its crucial focus
TERMINATION is on what is happening currently, in the
 The final step in the helping process life situation in or outside the group, or in
 Done when the goals for the client have both.
been substantially achieved; 3. It is developmental. It sees people as
 there is no reason to expect that any being continually able to move forward in
more significant gains can be achieved a life-long process of self-realization, or
by extending the helping relationship;’ fulfillment of potential in social
 Or very little progress or movement functioning.
toward the achievement of agreed-on
goals for the individual /or the group;
 After having done one’s best and it’s THE WORKER HAS THREE BASIC
clear that the worker is not getting there. AREAS OF OPERATION:
1. the group goal-achieving process;
Hartford describes the following parts of 2. interpersonal relations;
termination: Instrumental behaviors – those
 Pre-termination- the period of consciously directed toward common
preparation for the actual ending which goal efforts;
can include the acknowledgment that the Expressive behaviors - unintended
group is about to end. behaviors which are emotional in
 Termination – the last actual session nature that individual members
 Post-termination – follow up plans manifest in the course of performing
which can be done on either an instrumental behaviors. (likes and
individual or on a group basis dislikes, approval and disapproval,
concern for others, apathy, fear, etc…
3. individual self- actualization
Theoretical Models/Approaches in working
with groups
Theoretical Models/Approaches 2. REMEDIAL APPROACH OR SOCIAL
1. The Developmental Approach (Emanuel TREATMENT MODEL BY: ROBERT D.
Tropp) VINTER
2. The Crisis-Centered Approach  Target to benefit from this model are
3. Remedial Approach (Robert D. Vinter) those who are headed toward
4. An Interactionist Approach (William deviant paths unless given timely
Schwartz) attention.
5. Organization Model  A distinguishing characteristic of
6. Psychosocial Approach this model is its interactional view of
7. Socialization Model deviance. (i.e., actions between
8. Task-Centered Approach persons constitute a series of
interactions which shape and
sustain behavioral patterns. The
1. THE DEVELOPMENTAL APPROACH judgments and responses of others
(EMANUEL TROPP) must be regarded as crucial features
 Traces its roots to Grace Coyle’s of all behavioral patterns.)
writings which underscores collective
self-help as the theme of group work,
on which is derived the first principle REMEDIAL MODEL :VINTER

2
 The deviant is not the only target  There is a symbiotic relationship
for intervention but also those between people and their
individuals and groups with whom environment, and therefore the
this person is in frequent contact. function of social work is to “mediate
 The group is both a “means for the process through which the
treatment and a context for individual and society reach out to
treatment.” each other through a mutual need for
 As a means- it serves as a vehicle self-fulfillment.”
through which peer interactions and
influences are used to affect Diagram showing the mediating function of
change; Social Work
 As a context, it provides
opportunities for direct worker-
client interactions which can
contribute to change.

VINTER’S TREATMENT SEQUENCE:


 Intake
 Diagnosis and Treatment
 Group Composition and Formation
 Group Development and Treatment
 Evaluation and Termination

VINTER’S STRATEGY OF
INTERVENTION
A. Direct Means of Influence : there is a
face-to-face contact between the  The group is seen as mutual aid
worker and the group member to group that is focused on a specific
effect. problem or problems .
 The group in this approach has four
B. Indirect Means of Influence : major features:
interventions that modify group 1) The group is a collective in which people
conditions affecting one or more face and interact with each other;
group members i.e., they are 2) The people need each other for certain
employed to influence the group so specific purposes;
that they, in turn influence the 3) People come together to work on
members. common tasks, and
1) group purposes or treatment goals 4) The work is embedded in a relevant
for the group agency function.
2) selection of group members 4. Crisis Intervention Approach
3) nature of group activities
4) size of group Used with individuals, groups and
communities, that are in a state of
C. Extra Group Means of Influence: disequilibrium because of a crisis they have
includes outside activities conducted on experienced.
behalf of clients. A crisis is an “upset in a steady state”, an
1) social roles and relations of clients prior emotional reaction on the part of the
to client status. individual, family, or group to a threatening
2) “Significant Others” – refers to those life event.
persons outside of the treatment group who
have crucial relations with clients 4. CRISIS INTERVENTION
3) social systems of which clients are APPROACH
members  Crisis is a temporary disturbance in
4) Social environment of the treatment one’s equilibrium resulting in the
group immobilization of problem-solving
abilities and other aspects of daily
Extra group relations - “refers to the functioning. It is not a considered a
behavior or attitudes of persons in the client’s disease or pathology , but a part of the
social environment or to large social systems normal growth process.
within which both clients and others occupy
 Crisis intervention - is a process for
statuses”
actively influencing the psychosocial
functioning of individuals, families
3. THE INTERACTIONIST and groups during a period of acute
APPROACH: WILLIAM disequilibrium.
SCHWARTZ

3
 Crisis intervention involves crisis-  What has the client tried to do to cope
oriented, time limited: making help with the stress produced by the
available within 24 to 72 hours of precipitating event ?
the request or “cry for help.”  What means of coping did the client
 No intake procedures, and no use in the past to cope with similar
waiting lists, not transfer of workers situations?
 The assessment-Planning-  Why is there a lack of “fit” between
Intervention sequence is not always the particular dilemma (problem-to-
followed because of urgency of the be-solved) and the coping means the
need. client has employed?
 Participation in the helping process
is usually voluntary. Step III: The Search for Alternative Ways of
 Most crisis states are limited to 4 to Coping that Might better Fit the Current
6 weeks , a maximum of 6 sessions Situation
of crisis intervention.  What different approaches to
Two major goals of crisis intervention are: modifying the problem might be
 To cushion the immediate impact of feasible to try out?
the disruptive, stressful event(s), and  What outside resources might be
 To help those directly affected as well needed and tapped for helping to
as significant others in the social resolve the problem/dilemma?
environment mobilize and use their  What new plan for action can be tested
psychosocial capabilities, now?
interpersonal skills, and social
resources for coping adaptively with CRISIS INCIDENT STRESS
the effects of stress. \ DEBRIEFING (CISD)
 Is a form of crisis intervention that
Golan presents two categories of tasks has been found helpful to many
involved in Crisis Intervention which may be Filipinos in collective crisis caused by
carried out concurrently: natural disasters like earthquakes and
1) Material –arrangement tasks (provision floods.
of concrete assistance and services)  It has also been used with human
2) Psychosocial tasks (concerned with service providers who are the
dealing with client’s feelings, doubts, ‘hidden victims” of the crisis
ambivalences, anxieties and despair ) experienced by their clients.

CISD IS APPLIED AFTER A ” CRITICAL


 Target population: INCIDENT” has occurred.
CISD
1. Individuals in crisis (e.g. victims or  Is a preventive stress management
rape and domestic violence) strategy designed to assist affected
2. Those in collective crisis (e.g. victims people in handling normal severe
of natural disasters) stress. The affected people are
3. Those associated with persons in crisis victims , who may be classified as:
(e.g. professionals and volunteers 1. Direct victims: those injured or
helping people in crisis) hurt, or who escaped harm;
2. Indirect victims: family, friends
THE FOUR STEP APPROACH IN GROUP and others identifying with the
CRISIS INTERVENTION direct victims;
3. Hidden victims: the crisis
Step 1: The search for the Precipitating Event workers, helpers or rescuers who
and its Meaning to the Client are “silent sufferers” though not
 When did the discomfort begin, or directly affected by the crisis.
when did the client start feeling worse?
 What recent change represents a ORGANIZATIONAL MODEL
threat to instinctual needs, or a  This model emphasizes the
threatened or actual loss of a organizational context of practice;
significant role or relationship?  Social workers are employed for
 What reminders have there been of a people:
previous situation? 1) in social transition (provide service to
 Why is the client coming for help now? people in the midst of transition from one
status to anther;
2) Emphasis is anomie reduction and
socialization ,
Step II: The Search for Coping Means 3) for people in the midst of social conflict
Utilized by the Client
PSYCHOSOCIAL APPROACH

4
 Its distinguishing characteristic is its
psychosocial orientation i.e., emphasis is
on the relationships between psychological
and social forces and the interaction between
the person, the small group of which he/she
is a member, and the environment.
 Aimed at prevention and enhancement as
well as restoration or rehabilitation, and is
therefore applicable to persons with actual
or potential problems in psychosocial
functioning.

SOCIALIZATION MODEL
 The major problem focus is inadequate
opportunity for role-learning in the social
network.
 The social worker’s challenge is to
provide opportunities for changed role
performance and interactions in
new/unusual situations .
 The GOAL: is social competence through
teaching and learning in social roles
(those which all adults are expected to
assume in their families, work groups,
and communities).

TASK-CENTERED APPROACH
 TCA is brief and time-limited for
problems of daily living.
 Its intervention is concentrated on
alleviating specific problems which
the client and the practitioner agree
to work upon.
 “Task” – is what the client is to do
to alleviate the problem, and
represents both an immediate goal
the client is to pursue, and the
means of achieving larger goal of
problem alleviation.

Helping Models

You might also like