Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Woodema Ulewicz 2018
Woodema Ulewicz 2018
net/publication/334030013
CITATIONS READS
4 11,337
1 author:
Robert Ulewicz
Czestochowa University of Technology
149 PUBLICATIONS 1,498 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Production Engineering Archives 26(2) - (project end June 15, 2020) View project
Production Engineering Archives 26(2020) - (project end March 15, 2020) View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Robert Ulewicz on 26 June 2019.
WoodEMA, i.a. – International Association for Economics and Management in Wood Processing
and Furniture Manufacturing, Svetošimunska 25, Zagreb, Croatia
Organisation Committee:
Prof. Branko Glavonjic, PhD. – Belgrade (SRB)
Prof. Denis Jelacic, PhD. – Zagreb (CRO)
Assis.prof. Slavica Petrović, PhD. – Belgrade (SRB)
Dragoljub Ivković, MSc. – Belgrade (SRB)
Aleksandra Lazarević, MSc. – Belgrade (SRB)
Miljan Kalem, BSc. – Belgrade (SRB)
Ljiljana Pajović, BEc. – Belgrade (SRB)
Gordana Stijepčić – Belgrade (SRB)
Edition: 50 copies
ISBN: 978-86-7299-277-9
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
ABSTRACT
The article presents the results of client satisfaction surveys of the furniture industry
in the Silesian and Lodz voivodships. In the respondents, the Servqual method was used
as a tool for measuring the quality of services offered by furniture manufacturers. One of the
basic sales rules is the awareness that customers do not buy the product or service itself,
but the resulting set of benefits. This means subconscious thinking of customers about what
is important to them in the product. The results of the Serqual surveys are to indicate the
areas of customer satisfaction from the entire purchase and installation of furniture.
Keywords: Servqual, customer satisfaction, furniture
1. INTRODUCTION
18
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
identify the actions necessary to improve the company’s image [1,11, 12]. Determining
what should be improved requires an in-depth analysis of customer satisfaction from the
course of service provision and from the level of its relationship.
A.Parashurman and the team have identified a model of five gaps (gaps) in the
quality of the service:
• Gap 1 - the difference between the expectations of the consumer and the
perception of these expectations by the managers.
• Gap 2 - the difference between the perception of the clients’ expectations by
the managers and the physical features of the service (standardization).
• Gap 3 - the difference between the specification of the quality of services and
the actual level of the service provided.
• Gap 4 - the difference between the level of the service actually delivered and
the information provided to the client about this service.
• Gap 5 - the difference between the client’s expectations and the services he
perceives.
• The factors that shape customer expectations include:
• oral communication,
• personal needs,
• previous experience, communication skills of service providers.
Five features have been established to ensure satisfying customer needs:
• tangibles – material housing of the service: equipping the company with
appropriate equipment, devices, employees’ clothing,
• reliability – reliability of the service: execution of the order according to the
requirements, in a timely manner;
• responsiveness – reaction to market needs: in a reliable manner, in line with
the client’s expectations, speed of the company’s operations and reactions;
• assurance – professionalism and reliability: substantive knowledge of the
employee, tact and the ability to gain customer trust;
• empathy – empathizing with the client’s needs, individualized approach, care,
communicativeness, accessibility.
Finally, in order that the quality measurement using the Servqual method was
carried out correctly, three questionnaires are used. The first one defines 22 conditions that
may be important for the perfect performance of the service in a given organization on the
market. In the second, the same 22 conditions become the criteria taken into account when
assessing the performance of a given service by a particular organization. In the third one,
the customer is asked to split 100 points at his own discretion into the five quality
components listed in the questionnaire [19]. Determining the perceived quality of services
consists in calculating the difference between the perception of the service and the ideal
(desired, expected) level of services, which also allows to capture the gap that emerges
between expectations and the perception of the service. It is possible thanks to this
approach to capture those elements to which the greatest attention should be paid in terms
of providing customer satisfaction [2,7,8 ].
19
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
The consumer research carried out indicates that as many as sixty-one percent of
the surveyed customers purchased new furniture in the last three years. There was also a
tendency to buy new furniture along with the increase in household income. Interesting is
also the distribution of the purchase of types of purchased furniture in the last three years.
The percentage share of the purchased types of furniture is as follows:
• living room furniture 40%,
• kitchen furniture 36%,
• bedroom furniture 35%,
• holiday upholstered furniture 29%,
• garden furniture 20%,
• children’s or youth furniture 20%,
20
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
The area of research carried out were furniture showrooms, craft workshops,
marketplaces (purchased directly from the producer) in the Śląskie and Łódzkie voivodships
in Poland, research on the quality of internet furniture sales services related to the whole
area of Poland - an on-line questionnaire. The aim of the research is to examine the level
of satisfaction of individual clients from the use of particular sales channels of furniture, i.e.
furniture showrooms, craft workshops, marketplaces and online stores.
Each channel was examined separately by deliberately selecting the clients who
use the given channel. Separate questions were prepared for each channel, but each of
them examined five dimensions of the service: material dimension, reliability, reaction to
customer expectations, professionalism and empathy. Customers of insurance companies
21
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
were asked about an opinion based on their experience of how to buy furniture and they
were presented in three dimensions:
• one - as a distribution channel from which customers would like to use in the
future and how they imagine the quality of services provided by this channel,
• the second - which clients currently use and
• third - the minimum level of service provision accepted by the client.
The studies used a seven-level Likert scale where 1 means that the analyzed feature
by the respondent is irrelevant - it is not important, while 7 is a very important feature. Also
included is the so-called tolerance zone. In this perspective, the service buyer uses two
categories of quality standards: the desired level of service quality and an acceptable level
of service quality. The difference between these values is just a tolerance zone.
Figure 1. The gap between the current and expected quality of the furniture sale service
provided by a furniture showroom
22
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
Table 1. The level of customer satisfaction with the sale of furniture in the furniture
showroom
Furniture showroom
The dimension of the service
Average rating Weight Sub-CSI
Empathy 5.07 15 10.86
Competence 5.02 18 12.90
Reaction to customer expectations 4.94 35 24.70
Reliability 4.95 17 12.02
Material 5.97 15 12.79
Customer Satisfaction Indeks 73.27
Figure 2. The gap between the current and expected quality of the furniture sale
service provided by the craft workshop
23
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
Table 2. The level of customer satisfaction with the sale of furniture in a craft workshop
Craft workshop
The dimension of the service
Average rating Weight Sub-CSI
Empathy 4.77 11 7.49
Competence 6.82 22 21.43
Reaction to customer expectations 5.25 30 22.50
Reliability 4.35 22 13.67
Material 5.53 15 11.85
Customer Satisfaction Indeks 76.94
3.3. Marketplaces
In the case of a difference between the current and expected quality of sales
services provided at marketplaces, the greatest was observed in the reliability category
(2.16). Customers have high expectations towards this category (6.56), however the
current value is much lower (4.40), although it is in the sphere of tolerance, which starts at
4.25. The smallest gap was found in the case of the dimension - professionalism (0.83),
and the area of reliability is the biggest tolerance zone, where the zone starts from 4.30
and response to customer needs 4.05.
The results obtained for marketplaces are shown in Figure 3, which also shows the
tolerance zone.
Figure 3. The gap between the current and expected quality of the furniture sale service
provided at marketplaces
24
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
Table 3. The level of customer satisfaction with the sale of furniture at the marketplace
Marketplace
The dimension of the service
Average rating Weight Sub-CSI
Empathy 4.99 14 9,98
Competence 5.19 23 17,05
Reaction to customer expectations 5.00 27 19,28
Reliability 4.40 24 15,08
Material 5.15 13 9,56
Customer Satisfaction Indeks 70,95
3.4. Internet
The third most popular shopping place turned out to be the Internet, reaching 28%
of responses. Indeed, people between the ages of 26 and 35 and people with higher
education (43%) buy more frequently than others on Internet. This shows that younger
customers are definitely more open to online offerings and online shopping. In addition,
41% of respondents are considering the purchase of furniture in this channel in the near
future. More and more people have access to the Internet and more and more people use
it as a convenient form, which this measure provides. The biggest gap was created in the
area of reliability (1.61), the lowest in empathy (1.10). In addition, in the area of reliability,
the tolerance zone begins already at 3.70, while in empathy, 2.90.
Figure 4. The gap between the current and expected quality of the furniture sale service
provided via the internet
25
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
Table 4. The level of customer satisfaction with the sale of furniture on the Internet
Internet
The dimension of the service
Average rating Weight Sub-CSI
Empathy 4.05 10 5.78
Competence 5.12 21 15.35
Reaction to customer expectations 4.70 23 15.44
Reliability 4.25 25 15.17
Material 5.55 21 16.65
Customer Satisfaction Indeks 68.39
CSI Customer Satisfaction Index is one of the basic qualitative tools measuring the
effectiveness of marketing activities and allows you to measure the level of customer
satisfaction in relation to predefined categories recognized by buyers as the most important
ones [9,20 ]. In order to calculate it, the average of all results obtained while assessing the
quality of the company’s operations is used (basic formula). In order not to disregard the
fact that some aspects of the activity may be more important to clients than others, the
partial satisfaction with the appropriate meaning weight is multiplied and the partial
satisfaction gained in this way (extended formula) is added. The satisfaction index should
answer the question: “To what extent does the enterprise succeed in satisfying customers
in terms of n requirements which are most important to them?”. Thanks to this approach,
it will be possible to compare the indicators, while changing the priorities of the clients, but
the number of attributes assessed unchanged, and it will be possible to analyze this
indicator among different target groups of buyers of the same product or service.
Respondents were also asked to allocate appropriate weights to individual categories (100
points in total).
Sub-Customer Satisfaction Indeks = sum of points awarded by customers in
individual categories x weight / number of categories considered
CSI Customer Satisfaction we calculate according to the formula:
26
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
4. Conclusion
Figure 5. Customer Satisfaction Index using individual sales channels for furniture
When analyzing CSI (Figure 5), online stores have the lowest CSI factor - 68.39%.
Highly by customers 76.94%, craft workshops were assessed in which you can directly
purchase and adjust the piece of furniture to your preferences directly at the manufacturer.
Small enterprises were accepted under the concept of a small craft workshops with up to
49 employees. Furniture showrooms as the most used shopping destination enjoy
satisfaction at the level of 73.21%.
It was assumed that CSI level from 0 to 35% is considered unsatisfactory, level from
36 to 50% - not satisfactory, from 51-65% - average satisfactory, level from 66 to 85% -
satisfactory and level from 86 to 100% - very satisfactory. The overall CSI of all channels
is 72.37%, which is why it should be considered satisfactory.
The SERVQUAL method presented in this article may be used for customer
satisfaction surveys from the furniture purchase process, however, it is necessary to take
into account the specifics of the furniture market and local habits of the inhabitants of a
27
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
given region. In Poland, it is still very popular to buy furniture at marketplaces where
furniture manufacturers or dealers are exhibiting, this distribution channel was rated in third
place at level of 70.95% .
REFERENCES
1. Cronin J.J.; Taylor S.A. (1994): SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance –
based and perceptions – minus – expectations measurement of service quality, Journal
of Marketing 58: pp. 125-131.
2. Fall, R. A.; Carrascoa, F.; Muñoz-Leivab, J.; Sánchez-Fernándezb, F. J. (2012): Liébana-
Cabanillasb, “A model for the integration of e-financial services questionnaires with
SERVQUAL scales under fuzzy linguistic modeling, Expert Systems with Applications
39(14/15): pp. 11535–11547.
3. Freeman, M. H., Shupe, T. F., Vlosky, R. P., & Barnes, H. M. (2003): Past, present, and future
of the wood preservation industry. Forest Products Journal 53(10): pp. 8–15.
4. Grzegorzewska, E.; Stasiak-Betlejewska, R. (2016): Development Of The Woodworking
Industry Production Potential In Poland - The Economical Dimension, Path Forward For
Wood Products: A Global Perspective, Proceedings Of Scientific Papers, Edited by:Jelacic,
D.: pp. 43-50.
5. Grzegorzewska, E., Wieckowska, M. (2017): Market Threats And Opportunities In The
Implementation Of Sustainable Products - Results From Empirical Study Of Furniture
Industry. Drewno 60(200): pp. 111–123.
6. Kuzman, M. K., Motik, D., Bicanic, K., Vlosky, R. P., Oblak, L. (2012): A Comparative Analysis
of Consumer Attitudes on the Use of Wood Products in Slovenia and Croatia. Drvna Industrija:
63(2),pp. 71–79.
7. Ingaldi, M.; Ulewicz, R. (2018): Evaluation of Quality of the e-Commerce Service. International
Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence: 9 (2), pp.55–66
8. Ingaldi, M.(2017): Overview of the Main Methods of Service Quality Analysis. Production
Engineering Archives 18: pp. 54–59.
9. Jelacic, D.; Grladinovic, T.; Sujova, A.; Galajdova, V. (2008): Motivation factors in wood
processing and furniture manufacturing, Drvna Industrija 59(1): pp.11-21
10. Jelacic, D., Pirc, A., & Hornakova, R. (2008). Innovation potential of wood processing and
furniture manufacturing enterprises. In Glavonjic, B (Ed.), Wood Processing And Furniture
Production In South East And Central Europe: Innovation And Competitiveness 2008: pp.
5–10.
11. Midor, K.; Kuczera M. (2018): Improving the service with the Servqual method, Management
Systems In Production Engineering 26(1): pp. 60-65.
12. Pacana, A.; Ulewicz, R. (2017): Research of Determinants Motiving to Implement the
Environmental Management System, Polish Journal of Management Studies 16 (1): pp. 165-174.
13. Pahrahsurahmun, A.; Zeithamel, V.; Berry, L. (1985): A conceptual model of service quality
and its implementation for future research, Journal of Marketing 49(4): pp. 41-50,
14. Palus, H., Altpergerova, A., Parobek, J. (2016): The Impact Of Global Financial And Economic
Crisis On Wood And Wood Products Market In Slovakia. In Kliestik, T (Ed.), Globalization And
Its Socio-Economic Consequences, 16th International Scientific Conference Proceedings,
Pts I-V: pp. 1620–1627.
28
11th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2018
INCREASING THE USE OF WOOD IN THE GLOBAL BIO-ECONOMY
15. Parobek, J., Loucanova, E., Kalamarova, M., Supin, M., Stofkova, K. R. (2015): Customer
Window Quadrant as a Tool for Tracking Customer Satisfaction on the Furniture Market.
In Sujova, A And Krajcirova, L (Ed.), INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE:
BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (BEM2015) Vol. 34: pp. 493–499.
16. Potkany, M. (2010): Economic Substance Of Outsourcing At Companies In Wood Working
Industry. In Majtan, S (Ed.), Aktualne Pohl’ady Na Konkurencieschopnost’ A Podnikanie, pp.
175–182.
17. Potkany, M., Stasiak-Betlejewska, R., Kovac, R., Gejdos, M. (2016). Outsourcing In Contidions
Of SMEs - The Potential For Cost Savings. Polish Journal Of Management Studies 13(1):
pp. 145–156.
18. Sterbova, M., Mat’ova, H., Parobek, J. (2015). Quality Control of Provided Services by Mystery
Shopping Method. In Sujova, A and Krajcirova, L (Ed.), International Scientific Conference:
Business Economics And Management (BEM2015) Vol. 34: pp. 105–112.
19. Tan, K.C.; Pawitra T.A. (2001): Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s Model into QFD for
Service Excellence Development, Managing Service Quality 11(6): pp.418-430.
20. Ulewicz, R. (2016): Quality Management System Operation in the Woodworking Industry,
Proceedings of the International Conference on the Path Forward for Wood Products, Baton
Rouge: pp. 51-56.
Authors address:
Ulewicz, Robert1
1
Department of Production Engineering and Safety, Faculty of Management, Czestochowa
University of Technology, Czestochowa, Poland
29