! ! " ! ! ! " !

# Search …

Sep 22, 2021 " 702

30 facts you NEED to know:

Your Covid Cribsheet
You asked for it, so we made it. A collection of all
the arguments you’ll ever need.

!"#$!%"&'#()

W
e get a lot of e-mails and private messages along
these lines “do you have a source for X?” or “can you point
me to mask studies?” or “I know I saw a graph for mortality,
but I can’t find it anymore”. And we understand, it’s been a long 18 months,
and there are so many statistics and numbers to try and keep straight in
your head.

So, to deal with all these requests, we decided to make a bullet-pointed

and sourced list for all the key points. A one-stop-shop.

Here are key facts and sources about the alleged “pandemic”, that will
help you get a grasp on what has happened to the world since January
2020, and help you enlighten any of your friends who might be still
trapped in the New Normal fog (click links to skip):

“Covid deaths” – Lockdowns – PCR Tests – “asymptomatic infection”

– Ventilators – Masks – Vaccines – Deception & Foreknowledge

!"#$%&'%()*+&,%,-"$./0%1%2*#$"3&$4
1. The survival rate of “Covid” is over 99%. Government medical
experts went out of their way to underline, from the beginning of the
pandemic, that the vast majority of the population are not in any danger from
Covid.

UK Gov't con.rms Covid19 harmless to VAST MA…

Watch later Share

Watch on

Almost all studies on the infection-fatality ratio (IFR) of Covid have

returned results between 0.04% and 0.5%. Meaning Covid’s survival
rate is at least 99.5%.

2. There has been NO unusual excess mortality. The press has

called 2020 the UK’s “deadliest year since world war two”, but this is
misleading because it ignores the massive increase in the population
since that time. A more reasonable statistical measure of mortality is
Age-Standardised Mortality Rate (ASMR):

By this measure, 2020 isn’t even the worst year for mortality since 2000,
In fact since 1943 only 9 years have been better than 2020.

Similarly, in the US the ASMR for 2020 is only at 2004 levels:

For a detailed breakdown of how Covid affected mortality across

Western Europe and the US click here. What increases in mortality we
have seen could be attributable to non-Covid causes [facts 7, 9 & 19].

3. “Covid death” counts are artificially inflated. Countries

around the globe have been defining a “Covid death” as a “death by any
cause within 28/30/60 days of a positive test”.

Healthcare officials from Italy, Germany, the UK, US, Northern Ireland
and others have all admitted to this practice:

Dr. Ngozi Ezike | How COVID Deaths are Classi.ed

Watch later Share

Watch on

Removing any distinction between dying of Covid, and dying of

something else after testing positive for Covid will naturally lead to over-
counting of “Covid deaths”. British pathologist Dr John Lee was
warning of this “substantial over-estimate” as early as last spring.
Other mainstream sources have reported it, too.

Considering the huge percentage of “asymptomatic” Covid infections

[14], the well-known prevalence of serious comorbidities [fact 4] and
the potential for false-positive tests [fact 18], this renders the Covid
death numbers an extremely unreliable statistic.

4. The vast majority of covid deaths have serious

comorbidities. In March 2020, the Italian government published
statistics showing 99.2% of their “Covid deaths” had at least one serious
comorbidity.

These included cancer, heart disease, dementia, Alzheimer’s, kidney

failure and diabetes (among others). Over 50% of them had three or
more serious pre-existing conditions.

This pattern has held up in all other countries over the course of the
“pandemic”. An October 2020 FOIA request to the UK’s ONS revealed
less than 10% of the official “Covid death” count at that time had Covid
as the sole cause of death.

5. Average age of “Covid death” is greater than the average

life expectancy. The average age of a “Covid death” in the UK is 82.5
years. In Italy it’s 86. Germany, 83. Switzerland, 86. Canada, 86. The US,
78, Australia, 82.

In almost all cases the median age of a “Covid death” is higher than the
national life expectancy.

As such, for most of the world, the “pandemic” has had little-to-no
impact on life expectancy. Contrast this with the Spanish flu, which saw
a 28% drop in life expectancy in the US in just over a year. [source]

6. Covid mortality exactly mirrors the natural mortality

curve. Statistical studies from the UK and India have shown that the
curve for “Covid death” follows the curve for expected mortality almost
exactly:

The risk of death “from Covid” follows, almost exactly, your background
risk of death in general.

The small increase for some of the older age groups can be accounted
for by other factors.[facts 7, 9 & 19]

7. There has been a massive increase in the use of

“unlawful” DNRs. Watchdogs and government agencies have
reported huge increases in the use of Do Not Resuscitate Orders (DNRs)
over the last twenty months.

In the US, hospitals considered “universal DNRs” for any patient who
tested positive for Covid, and whistleblowing nurses have admitted the
DNR system was abused in New York.

In the UK there was an “unprecdented” rise in “illegal” DNRs for

disabled people, GP surgeries sent out letters to non-terminal patients
recommending they sign DNR orders, whilst other doctors signed
“blanket DNRs” for entire nursing homes.

A study done by Sheffield Univerisity found over one-third of all

“suspected” Covid patients had a DNR attached to their file within 24
hours of hospital admission.

Blanket use of coerced or illegal DNR orders could account for any
increases in mortality in 2020/21.[Facts 2 & 6]

!"#$%&&'%3*)5,*67/
8. Lockdowns do not prevent the spread of disease. There is
little to no evidence lockdowns have any impact on limiting “Covid
deaths”. If you compare regions that locked down to regions that did
not, you can see no pattern at all.

“Covid deaths” in Florida (no lockdown) vs California (lockdown)

“Covid deaths” in Sweden (no lockdown) vs UK (lockdown)

9. Lockdowns kill people. There is strong evidence that lockdowns

– through social, economic and other public health damage – are
deadlier than the “virus”.

Dr David Nabarro, World Health Organization special envoy for Covid-

19 described lockdowns as a “global catastrophe” in October 2020:

“ We in the World Health Organization do not

advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control
of the virus[…] it seems we may have a doubling of
world poverty by next year. We may well have at least
a doubling of child malnutrition […] This is a terrible,
ghastly global catastrophe.”

A UN report from April 2020 warned of 100,000s of children being

killed by the economic impact of lockdowns, while tens of millions
more face possible poverty and famine.

Unemployment, poverty, suicide, alcoholism, drug use and other

social/mental health crises are spiking all over the world. While missed
and delayed surgeries and screenings are going to see increased
mortality from heart disease, cancer et al. in the near future.

The impact of lockdown would account for the small increases in excess
mortality [Facts 2 & 6]

10. Hospitals were never unusually over-burdened. the main

argument used to defend lockdowns is that “flattening the curve” would
prevent a rapid influx of cases and protect healthcare systems from
collapse. But most healthcare systems were never close to collapse at all.

In March 2020 it was reported that hospitals in Spain and Italy were
over-flowing with patients, but this happens every flu season. In 2017
Spanish hospitals were at 200% capacity, and 2015 saw patients
sleeping in corridors. A paper JAMA paper from March 2020 found that
Italian hospitals “typically run at 85-90% capacity in the winter months”.

In the UK, the NHS is regularly stretched to breaking point over the
winter.

As part of their Covid policy, the NHS announced in Spring of 2020

that they would be “re-organizing hospital capacity in new ways to treat Covid
and non-Covid patients separately” and that “as result hospitals will experience
capacity pressures at lower overall occupancy rates than would previously have
been the case.”

This means they removed thousands of beds. During an alleged deadly

pandemic, they reduced the maximum occupancy of hospitals. Despite
this, the NHS never felt pressure beyond your typical flu season, and at
times actually had 4x more empty beds than normal.

In both the UK and US millions were spent on temporary emergency

hospitals that were never used.

!"#$%&&&'%!)#%$-/$/
11. PCR tests were not designed to diagnose illness. The
Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test is
described in the media as the “gold standard” for Covid diagnosis. But
the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended it to be
used as a diagnostic tool, and said so publicly:

“ PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole

lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you
that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up
with was going to hurt you or anything like that.”

12. PCR Tests have a history of being inaccurate and

unreliable. The “gold standard” PCR tests for Covid are known to
produce a lot of false-positive results, by reacting to DNA material that
is not specific to Sars-Cov-2.

A Chinese study found the same patient could get two different results
from the same test on the same day. In Germany, tests are known to
have reacted to common cold viruses. A 2006 study found PCR tests
for one virus responded to other viruses too. In 2007, a reliance on
PCR tests resulted in an “outbreak” of Whooping Cough that never
actually existed. Some tests in the US even reacted to the negative
control sample.

The late President of Tanzania, John Magufuli, submitted samples

goat, pawpaw and motor oil for PCR testing, all came back positive for
the virus.

As early as February of 2020 experts were admitting the test was

unreliable. Dr Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese Academy of
Medical Sciences told Chinese state television “The accuracy of the tests is
only 30-50%”. The Australian government’s own website claimed “There is
limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available
COVID-19 tests.” And a Portuguese court ruled that PCR tests were
“unreliable” and should not be used for diagnosis.

You can read detailed breakdowns of the failings of PCR tests here,
here and here.

13. The CT values of the PCR tests are too high. PCR tests are
run in cycles, the number of cycles you use to get your result is known
as your “cycle threshold” or CT value. Kary Mullis said: “If you have to go
more than 40 cycles[…]there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.”

The MIQE PCR guidelines agree, stating: “[CT] values higher than 40 are
suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported,”
Dr Fauci himself even admitted anything over 35 cycles is almost never
culturable.

Dr Juliet Morrison, virologist at the University of California, Riverside,

told the New York Times: Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too
sensitive…I’m shocked that people would think that 40 [cycles] could represent a
positive…A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35″.

In the same article Dr Michael Mina, of the Harvard School of Public

Health, said the limit should be 30, and the author goes on to point out
that reducing the CT from 40 to 30 would have reduced “covid cases” in
some states by as much as 90%.

The CDC’s own data suggests no sample over 33 cycles could be

cultured, and Germany’s Robert Koch Institute says nothing over 30
cycles is likely to be infectious.

Despite this, it is known almost all the labs in the US are running their
tests at least 37 cycles and sometimes as high as 45. The NHS “standard
operating procedure” for PCR tests rules set the limit at 40 cycles.

Based on what we know about the CT values, the majority of PCR test
results are at best questionable.

14. The World Health Organization (Twice) Admitted PCR

tests produced false positives. In December 2020 WHO put out a
briefing memo on the PCR process instructing labs to be wary of high
CT values causing false positive results:

“ when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that

many cycles were required to detect virus. In some
circumstances, the distinction between background
noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult
to ascertain.

Then, in January 2021, the WHO released another memo, this time
warning that “asymptomatic” positive PCR tests should be re-tested
because they might be false positives:

“ Where test results do not correspond with the clinical

presentation, a new specimen should be taken and
retested using the same or different NAT technology.
 *

15. The scientific basis for Covid tests is questionable. The

genome of the Sars-Cov-2 virus was supposedly sequenced by Chinese
scientists in December 2019, then published on January 10th 2020. Less
than two weeks later, German virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) had
allegedly used the genome to create assays for PCR tests.

They wrote a paper, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-

time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on January 21st 2020,
and then accepted on January 22nd. Meaning the paper was allegedly
“peer-reviewed” in less than 24 hours. A process that typically takes
weeks.

Since then, a consortium of over forty life scientists has petitioned for
the withdrawal of the paper, writing a lengthy report detailing 10 major
errors in the paper’s methodology.

They have also requested the release of the journal’s peer-review report,
to prove the paper really did pass through the peer-review process. The
journal has yet to comply.

The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of every Covid PCR test in the
world. If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is also questionable.

!"#$%&+'%("/42!$*2"$&)%&7Z-)$&*70
16. The majority of Covid infections are “asymptomatic”.
From as early as March 2020, studies done in Italy were suggesting 50-
75% of positive Covid tests had no symptoms. Another UK study from
August 2020 found as much as 86% of “Covid patients” experienced no
viral symptoms at all.

It is literally impossible to tell the difference between an “asymptomatic

case” and a false-positive test result.

17. There is very little evidence supporting the alleged

danger of “asymptomatic transmission”. In June 2020, Dr
Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s emerging diseases and
zoonosis unit, said:

“ From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an

asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a
secondary individual,”

A meta-analysis of Covid studies, published by Journal of the American

Medical Association (JAMA) in December 2020, found that
asymptomatic carriers had a less than 1% chance of infecting people
within their household. Another study, done on influenza in 2009,
found:

“ …limited evidence to suggest the importance of

[asymptomatic] transmission. The role of
asymptomatic or presymptomatic influenza-infected
individuals in disease transmission may have been
overestimated…”

Given the known flaws of the PCR tests, many “asymptomatic cases”
may be false positives.[fact 14]

!"#$%+'%+-7$&3"$*#/
18. Ventilation is NOT a treatment for respiratory viruses.
Mechanical ventilation is not, and never has been, recommended
treatment for respiratory infection of any kind. In the early days of the
pandemic, many doctors came forward questioning the use of
ventilators to treat “Covid”.

Writing in The Spectator, Dr Matt Strauss stated:

“ Ventilators do not cure any disease. They can fill your

lungs with air when you find yourself unable to do so
yourself. They are associated with lung diseases in the
public’s consciousness, but this is not in fact their most
common or most appropriate application.

German Pulmonologist Dr Thomas Voshaar, chairman of Association of

Pneumatological Clinics said:

“ When we read the first studies and reports from China

and Italy, we immediately asked ourselves why
intubation was so common there. This contradicted
our clinical experience with viral pneumonia.

Despite this, the WHO, CDC, ECDC and NHS all “recommended” Covid
patients be ventilated instead of using non-invasive methods.

This was not a medical policy designed to best treat the patients, but
rather to reduce the hypothetical spread of Covid by preventing patients
from exhaling aerosol droplets.

19. Ventilators killed people. Putting someone on a ventilator who

is suffering from influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease, or any other condition which restricts breathing or affects the
lungs, will not alleviate any of those symptoms. In fact, it will almost
certainly make it worse, and will kill many of them.

Intubation tubes are a source of potential a infection known as

“ventilator-associated pneumonia”, which studies show affects up to
28% of all people put on ventilators, and kills 20-55% of those infected.

Mechanical ventilation is also damaging to the physical structure of the

lungs, resulting in “ventilator-induced lung injury”, which can
dramatically impact quality of life, and even result in death.

Experts estimate 40-50% of ventilated patients die, regardless of their

disease. Around the world, between 66 and 86% of all “Covid patients”
put on ventilators died.

According to the “undercover nurse”, ventilators were being used so

improperly in New York, they were destroying patients’ lungs:

Perspectives on the Pandemic | The (Undercover)…

Watch later Share

Watch on

This policy was negligence at best, and potentially deliberate murder at

worst. This misuse of ventilators could account for any increase in
mortality in 2020/21 [Facts 2 & 6]

!"#$%+&'%2"/5/
20. Masks don’t work. At least a dozen scientific studies have
shown that masks do nothing to stop the spread of respiratory viruses.

One meta-analysis published by the CDC in May 2020 found “no

significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks”.

Another study with over 8000 subjects found masks “did not seem to be
effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against
clinical respiratory infection.”

There are literally too many to quote them all, but you can read them: [1]
[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Or read a summary by SPR here.

While some studies have been done claiming to show mask do work for
Covid, they are all seriously flawed. One relied on self-reported surveys
as data. Another was so badly designed a panel of experts demand it be
withdrawn. A third was withdrawn after its predictions proved entirely
incorrect.

The WHO commissioned their own meta-analysis in the Lancet, but

that study looked only at N95 masks and only in hospitals. [For full run
down on the bad data in this study click here.]

Aside from scientific evidence, there’s plenty of real-world evidence

that masks do nothing to halt the spread of disease.

For example, North Dakota and South Dakota had near-identical case
figures, despite one having a mask-mandate and the other not:

In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid

“cases” than counties with mask mandates. And despite masks being
very common in Japan, they had their worst flu outbreak in decades in
2019.

21. Masks are bad for your health. Wearing a mask for long
periods, wearing the same mask more than once, and other aspects of
cloth masks can be bad for your health. A long study on the detrimental
effects of mask-wearing was recently published by the International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Dr. James Meehan reported in August 2020 he was seeing increases in

bacterial pneumonia, fungal infections, facial rashes .

Masks are also known to contain plastic microfibers, which damage

the lungs when inhaled and may be potentially carcinogenic.

Childen wearing masks encourages mouth-breathing, which results in

facial deformities.

People around the world have passed out due to CO2 poisoning while
wearing their masks, and some children in China even suffered sudden
cardiac arrest.

22. Masks are bad for the planet. Millions upon millions of
disposable masks have been used per month for over a year. A report
from the UN found the Covid19 pandemic will likely result in plastic
waste more than doubling in the next few years., and the vast majority
of that is face masks.

The report goes on to warn these masks (and other medical waste) will
clog sewage and irrigation systems, which will have knock on effects on
public health, irrigation and agriculture.

A study from the University of Swansea found “heavy metals and plastic
fibres were released when throw-away masks were submerged in water.” These
materials are toxic to both people and wildlife.

!"#$%+&&'%+"))&7-/
23. Covid “vaccines” are totally unprecedented. Before 2020
no successful vaccine against a human coronavirus had ever been
developed. Since then we have allegedly made 20 of them in 18 months.

Scientists have been trying to develop a SARS and MERS vaccine for
years with little success. Some of the failed SARS vaccines actually
caused hypersensitivity to the SARS virus. Meaning that vaccinated
mice could potentially get the disease more severely than unvaccinated
mice. Another attempt caused liver damage in ferrets.

While traditional vaccines work by exposing the body to a weakened

strain of the microorganism responsible for causing the disease, these
new Covid vaccines are mRNA vaccines.

mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccines theoretically work by

injecting viral mRNA into the body, where it replicates inside your cells
and encourages your body to recognise, and make antigens for, the
“spike proteins” of the virus. They have been the subject of
research since the 1990s, but before 2020 no mRNA vaccine was ever
approved for use.

24. Vaccines do not confer immunity or prevent

transmission. It is readily admitted that Covid “vaccines” do
not confer immunity from infection and do not prevent you from
passing the disease onto others. Indeed, an article in the British
Medical Journal highlighted that the vaccine studies were not designed
to even try and assess if the “vaccines” limited transmission.

The vaccine manufacturers themselves, upon releasing the untested

mRNA gene therapies, were quite clear their product’s “efficacy” was
based on “reducing the severity of symptoms”.

25. The vaccines were rushed and have unknown longterm

effects. Vaccine development is a slow, laborious process. Usually,
from development through testing and finally being approved for
public use takes many years. The various vaccines for Covid were all
developed and approved in less than a year. Obviously there can be no
long-term safety data on chemicals which are less than a year old.

Pfizer even admit this is true in the leaked supply contract between the
pharmaceutical giant, and the government of Albania:

“ the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not

currently known and that there may be adverse effects
of the Vaccine that are not currently known

Further, none of the vaccines have been subject to proper trials. Many
of them skipped early-stage trials entirely, and the late-stage human
trials have either not been peer-reviewed, have not released their data,
will not finish until 2023 or were abandoned after “severe adverse
effects”.

26. Vaccine manufacturers have been granted legal

indemnity should they cause harm. The USA’s Public Readiness
and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) grants immunity until at
least 2024.

The EU’s product licensing law does the same, and there are reports of
confidential liability clauses in the contracts the EU signed with
vaccine manufacturers.

The UK went even further, granting permanent legal indemnity to the

government, and any employees thereof, for any harm done when a
patient is being treated for Covid19 or “suspected Covid19”.

Again, the leaked Albanian contract suggests that Pfizer, at least, made
this indemnity a standard demand of supplying Covid vaccines:

“ Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold

harmless Pfizer […] from and against any and all suits,
claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities,
settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses

!"#$%+&&&'%,-)-!$&*7%1%Z*#-57*63-,@-
27. The EU was preparing “vaccine passports” at least a
YEAR before the pandemic began. Proposed COVID
countermeasures, presented to the public as improvised emergency
measures, have existed since before the emergence of the disease.

Two EU documents published in 2018, the “2018 State of Vaccine

Confidence” and a technical report titled “Designing and implementing an
immunisation information system” discussed the plausibility of an EU-
wide vaccination monitoring system.

These documents were combined into the 2019 “Vaccination Roadmap”,

which (among other things) established a “feasibility study” on vaccine
passports to begin in 2019 and finish in 2021:

This report’s final conclusions were released to the public in September

2019, just a month before Event 201 (below).

28. A “training exercise” predicted the pandemic just weeks

before it started. In October 2019 the World Economic Forum and
Johns Hopkins University held Event 201. This was a training exercise
based on a zoonotic coronavirus starting a worldwide pandemic. The
exercise was sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and
GAVI the vaccine alliance.

The exercise published its findings and recommendations in November

2019 as a “call to action”. One month later, China recorded their first
case of “Covid”.

29. Since the beginning of 2020, the Flu has “disappeared”.

In the United States, since February 2020, influenza cases have
allegedly dropped by over 98%.

It’s not just the US either, globally flu has apparently almost completely
disappeared.

Meanwhile, a new disease called “Covid”, which has identical symptoms

and a similar mortality rate to influenza, is apparently affecting all the
people normally affected by the flu.

30. The elite have made fortunes during the pandemic. Since
the beginning of lockdown the wealthiest people have become
significantly wealthier. Forbes reported that 40 new billionaires have
been created “fighting the coronavirus”, with 9 of them being vaccine
manufacturers.

Business Insider reported that “billionaires saw their net worth increase by
half a trillion dollars” by October 2020.

Clearly that number will be even bigger by now.

*'+,+$-.+$#'+$/"#-($0-1#,$20$#'+$3-%4+5"16$3.+,+%#+4$'+.+$-,$-
.+,27.1+$#2$'+(3$02.57(-#+$-%4$,7332.#$)27.$-.&75+%#,$8"#'
0."+%4,$2.$,#.-%&+.,9$*'-%:,$#2$-(($#'+$.+,+-.1'+.,$8'2$'-/+
12((-#+4$-%4$12((+1#+4$#'",$"%02.5-#"2%$2/+.$#'+$(-,#$#8+%#)
52%#',6$+,3+1"-(()%/E;JJ%!L:;QH%#=J=BCQ?9

;0$)27$'-/+$-%)#'"%&$)27$827(4$(":+$#2$,++$"%1(74+46$(+#$7,$:%28
"%$#'+$1255+%#,

FILED UNDER: CORONAVIRUS K%FEATURED K%LATEST

TAGGED WITH: A NT HO N Y FAU C I K%C O RO N AV I RU S K%C OV I D 1 9 K%K A RY M U L L I S K%M A S K S K%N H S

can you spare $1.00 a month to support independent media

89:;<=%>?=%@ABCD;B9%E=%BC=%7*$%FA9D=D%GH%I;::%1%2=:;9DB%@B>=JK%LC%B9H
L>?=C%7@*%LC%MLN=C9O=9>P%/L%B%F=E%QL;9J%;9%LAC%RBC%>L%?=:S%AJ%<==S%ML;9M
BC=%B:EBHJ%BSSC=Q;B>=DP

*AC%I;>QL;9%T$#%QLD=%;J'%!"#!$%&'()*+$,-./012-34561))7*8*9,

4.9
"C>;Q:=%#B>;9M

%/AGJQC;G=% )L99=Q>%E;>?

VWWW
B I LINK B-QUOTE U UL OL LI CODE SPOILER

TL;9%>?=%D;JQAJJ;L9

!"#$%&''()*+ newest

!"#$%&'#()*+& %/=S%UVK%UWUX%Y'XU%!2

Please comment on the recent Israeli study finding fully vaxxed people 27x more likely to get the
virus than the unvaxxed: https://nationalfile.com/israeli-study-fully-vaxxed-are-27-times-
more-likely-to-get-covid-compared-to-people-with-natural-immunity/
W W %#=S:H

,-. %/=S%UVK%UWUX%['[\%!2

JUST KEEP TRYING TO CONVINCE YOURSELVES THAT EVERYTHING IS FINE….THEN WE CAN

HEAR YOU SAYING HOW WRONG YOU WERE WHEN YOU END UP IN THE HOSPITAL ABOUT
TO DIE…..IDIOTS DENYING SCIENCE ARE JUST DUMBASSES
X ]Y %#=S:H

+,-$.$/0-12# %/=S%UVK%UWUX%^'__%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%/"2
"DO;9
Thanks for your perspective. I notice you don’t fault any of the points this piece raises. Do you
have anything science-based with which to refute, or just this emotional outburst? A2
V W %#=S:H

+/' %/=S%UVK%UWUX%Y'_W%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%/BO%]%"DO;9U

Talk to the people who have to deal with the idiots who show up to the overcrowded ICU’S
after denying the virus was/is real…..talk to people who have lost loved ones to this
horrible disease after denying it was real……emotional, yes, how can you not be when
dealing with ignorant fools who deny reality……those who deny science are leading us
back to the dark ages, and that’s what this article is doing, preying on dumbasses who
don’t understand what a controlled experiment is or involves…..all is fine with the
ignorant masses until someone you know and love gets sick and dies…..science deniers
are sadly mistaken and it leads to more suffering and death….and that sucks….it sucks
having to deal with you and others like you…..people stupidly believed that every past
vaccine was a gov’t plot….how did that work out?……dumbasses
W ]U %#=S:H

+34516$.$/0-127 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%Y'_Y%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%/"2
"DO;9
So, that’s a big no to Sam’s question.

This article is nothing but solid, mainstream facts, many of them based on science. You
respond with a fact-free ad home rant and then accuse us of being anti-science.

The word science has lost its meaning to you. It has nothing to do with data and
everything to do with faith.

You might just as well be screaming ‘witch!’ or ‘heretic!’

W W %#=S:H

8,926:$;<==>6 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%Y'[^%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%/"2

Believing 2 chain link fences can stop a mosquito or believing in never tried before
experimental gene therapy masquerading as vaccines which we know categorically
DO NOT STOP INFECTION OR TRANSMISSION is analogous to building your own
rocket in your garage to attempt to fly high enough to prove the earth is in fact flat.
W W %#=S:H

?,-6@ %/=S%UVK%UWUX%Y'[`%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%/"2

I think you will see, if you read the article objectively, this article is not refuting the
science. Instead, it is using documented science to show the faults of how the
situation is being handled. Instead of screaming and yelling your opinion perhaps you
can, as Sam already requested, refute some of the article’s points with some science?

I honestly am interested in seeing scientific papers that present your viewpoint. I

have requested the same before from others that scream your perspective but each
and every time I only receive abuse and never once science.

Thank you.
W W %#=S:H

/$0 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%_'[X%!2

Midazolam!
W W %#=S:H

1&2 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%U'[[%!2

Great list Kit. I would only add a section on therapeutics as C-19 is so easily treated that the
withholding of treatment is a crime.

https://c19early.com/
U W %#=S:H

?,-6@ %/=S%UVK%UWUX%\'X^%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%R=F

While perhaps c19early may push early treatments I would also like to point out (from the top
of their homepage), they also seem to push vaccines as “effective”. . .

“COVID-19 early treatment analysis. Treatments do not replace vaccines and other measures.
All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Elimination is a race against viral
evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all
variants. Denying efficacy increases the risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and increases
mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage.”

Do your own research and come to an objective decision for your particular situation.
X W %#=S:H

?,-6@ %/=S%UVK%UWUX%['\\%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%TBO=J

I would like to add that there is, coincidentally, another “Covid-19 Early Treatment Fund
(CETF)” that is apparently not affliated with the link that was posted but carries the same
name minus the “Fund” part and “is administered by Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors”

https://www.treatearly.org

Do we still today trust the Rockefeller Foundation?

Do your research and come to your own conclusions.

Thanks.
X W %#=S:H

?,-6@ %/=S%UVK%UWUX%^'W_%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%TBO=J

To note. The link @jef posted is represented on Twitter as @covidanalysis and has
had it’s account suspended…

https://mobile.twitter.com/CovidAnalysis

More mystery to this case. Could it be perhaps because they show studies on
Ivermectin, or vitamins? I don’t know. Perhaps, CETF didnt like that?

In my opinion, based upon my own research, I have a hard time these days to trust
any pharmaceuticals.

We should instead, in my opinion be focusing on holistic remedies as of which I am

still studying. I currently feel there may be some kind of balance between all three of
holistic, homeopathic and allopathic.
X W %#=S:H

34"506$789 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%XU'XX%!2

What about patents for the treatment of Covid?Who owns them?

What kind of compensation is being or will be received.
Was the virus itself patented?
Why did the U S. / Fauci send money to a Wuhan lab OWNED BY THE CHINESE MILITARY.??
_ W %#=S:H

:"4;$<0=+40; %/=S%UVK%UWUX%XX'UY%"2

Fantastic effort, thanks. I think the biggest issue missed is the way that the ‘narrative’,
symbolised by the mask, is creating a climate and culture of fear in all children worldwide.
Y W %#=S:H

!()0;$.=(>4? %/=S%UVK%UWUX%^'\U%"2

More needs to be said on adverse injection reactions:

Steve Kirsch’s documented research

http://www.skirsch.com/covid/ACIP.pdf

Steve Kirsch website

https://www.skirsch.io/

Steve Kirsch presentation of research

https://rumble.com/vm8ayu-tfnt-1-covid-vaccines-have-killed-over-200000-americans.html

Personal testimonies

https://1000covidstories.com/

https://nomoresilence.world

https://thecovidworld.com

News, media, social media

https://files.catbox.moe/mj44w3.pdf

Israel testimonies
https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/

Retired British GP research

https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/how-many-people-are-vaccines-killing

Government sites

https://openvaers.com

https://vaers.hhs.gov

https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk

Searchable Yellow Card:

https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.

EUdravigilance:
https://www.adrreports.eu/en/eudravigilance.html

https://www.adrreports.eu/en/index.html

WHO’s own tracker – enter product name when searching so enter “Comirnaty” – results shown
are for all Covid vaccines registered:
http://vigiaccess.org/

Brazil releases data – https://www.marktaliano.net/over-32000-people-dead-in-brazil-

following-covid-19-vaccines-according-to-official-media-report/

Australia releases data…

https://www.tga.gov.au/reporting-suspected-side-effects-associated-covid-19-vaccine
^ W %#=S:H

@4)'')6$,A&); %/=S%UVK%UWUX%^'U\%"2

Probably a good idea to speak about informed consent (and censoring truth), natural immunity
(being superior to artificially acquired “immunity”) and more. However, the crib sheet could get
VERY long. Great job on this – and thank you.
XU W %#=S:H

@4)'')6$,A&); %/=S%UVK%UWUX%^'UX%"2

And here’s another from the famed NWO operative Kissinger:

“Once the herd accepts mandatory forcible vaccination, it’s game over!
They will accept anything – forcible blood or organ donation – for the “greater good.”
We can genetically modify children and sterilize them – for the “greater good.”
Control sheep minds and you control the herd. Vaccine makers stand to make billions, and many
of you in this room today are investors. It’s a big win-win!
We thin out the herd and the herd pay us for extermination services.”
~ Dr Henry Kissinger
^ ]X %#=S:H

862 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%XW'\U%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%!?;::;J%/>=;9

Dear Phillis, could you be kind to provide any external link to this quotation ?
As there is nothing that would make me happier to know that this is true, I just couldn’t find
any relevant or original source of this claims, no matter how much I search. Only hear and say.
W W %#=S:H

A,>039B %/=S%UVK%UWUX%U'[X%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%I=9

Perhaps Kissinger thinks that way, but actually saying so? I doubt it.
W W %#=S:H

@4)'')6$,A&); %/=S%UVK%UWUX%^'UW%"2

I find that you can learn an awful lot from quotations – so, here is one for you that should explain
what is going on to anyone with any doubt:

“The future will be about finding a way to reduce the population…Of course, we will not be able to execute
people or build camps. We get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good…We will find or
cause something, a pandemic targeting certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus affecting the
old or the elderly, it doesn’t matter, the weak and the fearful will succumb to it. The stupid will believe in it
and ask to be treated. We will have taken care of having panned the treatment, a treatment that will be
the solution. The selection of idiots will therefore be done by itself: they will go to the slaughterhouse
alone.”
~ from a 1981 book by Bilderberger Jacques Attalli

Jacques was an advisor to President Mitterand of France in the 80s

_ W %#=S:H

C:,2,$D1>>1,90 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%XU'XU%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%!?;::;J%/>=;9

Don’t forget that “climate change” will be an important tool for reducing the world
population!
X W %#=S:H

:0;$B %/=S%UVK%UWUX%_'_X%"2

It would be good to mention the role of Remdesivir in people dying while ventilated with the link
to kidney and other organ failure and the rush to market of this product.
Y W %#=S:H

A)52("5 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%U'UX%"2

Very useful, thanks, but a crib-sheet is supposed to be small and concise. Something you can
keep up your sleeve. You wouldn’t very easily be able to get this one out in an exam!
X ]^ %#=S:H

)3E$+3$F966 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%\'W[%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%>;OFCLO

Copy and paste it without the pictures and video. Print it small. That’s what I did.
X W %#=S:H

:&22$!'0895"; %/=S%UVK%UWUX%X'__%"2

This NIH study shows a 100% effectiveness in nursing home residents with covid (median age of
85) using inexpensive and well-known drugs — way back in Mar-Apr of 2020. It was not even
published until Jan 2021 and has received no attention in the press.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833340/#!po=34.9057
[ W %#=S:H

C')22$7*D0(*6 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%XU'[^%"2

As I said in response to a later article by Kit, it seems to me that it might be a good idea for him to
have someone proofread his articles before they’re published.

In the UK there was an “unprecdented” rise in…

… increased mortality from heart disease, cancer et al. in the near future.
A paper JAMA paper from March 2020 found…
Intubation tubes are a source of potential a infection known as…
While some studies have been done claiming to show mask do work for Covid…

A week ago I sent Off-G a friendly email pointing out the above errors and quite a few others,
some of which, I’m happy to admit, were possibly more a matter of style and personal taste than
actual “errors”. Oh well, perhaps I shouldn’t have bothered.
XX ]_ %#=S:H

?1-* %/=S%UVK%UWUX%U'\_%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%):;a%-DEBCDJ

A very useful way to assess the credibility of any article, at least.

W W %#=S:H

1=;9&50)' %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XX'U_%!2

A mention about the patents that were filed well in advance of this disease escaping. And some
interesting players that filed them (and hold these patents still).
[ W %#=S:H

.A'E8 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XX'XX%!2

Please watch the documentary The Cult of Virology on Bitchute to learn that viruses are not
vectors of diseases but merely dead bio material that helps in detoxifying the body of the
numerous poisons we ingest.
[ ]X %#=S:H

B&("F)G&,&G&; %/=S%UYK%UWUX%`'[[%!2

I would add to all of this the free supercomputer on which all this was developed and tested
(whole covid mainpulation). For example to forecast weather you need a supercomputer on
which it will be run. Supercomputers are costly and known.
But greed has allowed unknown group to have a free supercomputer, most powerfull with free
electricity as a bonus: bitcoin (and other coin)
W W %#=S:H

=>3GHG5,12 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%_'U_%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%b=CLZ;N=/=N=9

you don’t know what you are talking about. these miners are too stupid, to be even seen as a
working computer.
the only thing they can do, is react on a predestinated code, chance that code, and sent it
back, always the same calculation, over and over.
please check what actually is the blockchain, and what code is sitting on it….nothing
W W %#=S:H

F(?&($3=89 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%`'[\%!2

Covid Scam-Sans Science, Sans Data, Sans Facts, “Sans Everything”; especially Rationality.
Covid=Covoodo
U W %#=S:H

HI, %/=S%UYK%UWUX%`'UV%!2

Vaccine Passports, “Medical Martial Law” and the “Stockholm Syndrome”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/vaccine-passports-medical-martial-law-and-the-stockholm-
syndrome/5740083
[ W %#=S:H

,=>&( %/=S%UYK%UWUX%Y'[`%!2

It is first and foremost an in your face psyop. It is about making people so emotional that they
don’t care about logic or true science any more at all. It reminds me of Casa Blanca when Bogart
says he came to Casa Blanca for the waters. When he is corrected and told Casa Blanca is a desert
he dryly replies that he was “misinformed.” Hah haha. Jokes on all of us who thought “they” were
so stupid and were told to buy so much crap. It is also about dividing and conquering and
separating the smarter people from those more easily swayed by propaganda people have been
taught to eat up with a spoon and a fork for breakfast. They are laughing at us. What can we do? I
mean seriously. Voting for Trump or watching Fox News for hours on end doesn’t seem to have
done a thing. I say turn to the God of your understanding. He/She is the sneakiest sneak of all
IMHO.
Y W %#=S:H

F9:69$*<GH %/=S%UYK%UWUX%`'[`%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%/AS=C

Concur
X W %#=S:H

F9:69$*<GH %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XW'W\%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%/AS=C

Super, re: “Sneakiest Sneak”?

Compare: “Time to enact our ‘sneaky sneaks’ plan!”
Miho Nishazumi “Girls und Panzer.”
W W %#=S:H

+<469 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%X'UV%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%ZCH=C%$AQ<

When I say God is the sneakiest of all the sneaks I guess what I mean is I spent so many
years arguing and fighting and trying to figure so much out I still don’t understand it all
but I believe there is a bi-partisan kind of “God” that sustains everything. Turn to that and
you are better off than the spiritually unwashed Hollywood-minded masses that don’t
realize they are under the thumb of a religion of sorts that is so greedy it won’t agree to
the importance of anything but its own luciferian kind of self which is very deliberately
ignorant. The quote that comes to mind is St. Augustine “I did not rest until I rested in
thee” or something to that effect.
U W %#=S:H

:$<"66"6 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%Y'W_%!2

Those are all great points and they make sense. However, the left and/or the Covidian Cult will
never give you a chance to debate this stuff. They know what’s best and you are nothing but a
conspiracy theorist.
X_ W %#=S:H

%?'0; %/=S%UYK%UWUX%^'[W%!2

Thank you.
^ W %#=S:H

:&0;$J0(*);&( %/=S%UYK%UWUX%^'\_%!2

booster causing myocarditus ?!

_ ]X %#=S:H

,A&G&$K"D& %/=S%UYK%UWUX%^'\X%!2

Curious that UN officials and our own US Congress and Senate are EXEMPT from jab
requirements.
XW W %#=S:H

F9:69$*<GH %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XW'X_%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%/>=N=%3LE=

Not so curious. Ruling Class Elites always act that way.

Which is why I would argue The Founders anticipated and tried to lay the groundwork for a
little Revolution now and again.
Too bad we didn’t pay enough attention.
X W %#=S:H

%0G)*$:"4;6"; %/=S%UYK%UWUX%^'UU%!2

As usual, follow the money. When someone either gets rich or an entity gets more power, then
you should always be suspect. If there was no money or power to gain, covid would be a thing of
the past.
Y W %#=S:H

!)''$L)8& %/=S%UYK%UWUX%\'[X%!2

This is an excellent summary of contrarian COVID topics. Kudos to editors for publishing this. As
someone who has also been researching COVID topics for more than a year, I think these two
items could have been added to this list:

1) COVID almost certainly existed and was spreading (widely) in many nations in the world as
early as November 2019 if not earlier.

2) The antibody tests were probably also manipulated to produce lower levels of early prevalence
than actually existed. Very few people received antibody tests prior to mid-March 2020, which
was probably intentional. It is important to recognize that detectable levels of IgG antibodies
fade in most people within 2 to 3 months. There weren’t many early serologic studies, but even
the few that were done were not picking up but a fraction of the people who had probably been
exposed to this virus three, four or five months before they belatedly were tested.

The virus horse was well out of the barn by the time we had lockdown in March 2020. Some
officials must know this, and evidence that would prove this (which exists) is off limits to
mainstream media investigation.
X\ ]U %#=S:H

)3*5,2H@ %/=S%UYK%UWUX%`'[`%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%I;::%#;Q=

COVID-19 is the name of a supposedly infectious disease, purportedly caused by the Sars-Cov-
2 virus. The Sars-Cov-2 virus has never been purified and isolated, as admitted by any
researcher who has claimed isolation, and the PCR test is only designed to detect fragments
of genetic information that is not exclusive to any one virus. It does not detect a “disease”
called COVID-19. Antibody tests cannot be valid for the same reason.

I’m sorry, but people who perpetuate “COVID almost certainly existed” at ANY time are part
of the problem. The entire field of virology needs to be re-examined, not just the obvious
nonsense in the last 18 months.
XY W %#=S:H

I39:$D,991@ %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XX'UV%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%7L$?B9<J

Thank you so much for saying this. Apparently there is a lawsuit happening in Canada by
a doctor that is showing how viruses have never been isolated and the the lab tests that
have “proved” the existence of viruses is false scientific data… It will prove that Claude
Bernard, Ethel Hume, Antoine Bechamp and many many others were right about how Dr.
Pasteur published false scientific data and how virus theory is bogus.
[ W %#=S:H

J51>>1@$+E612 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%['_\%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%5LCH%.BCC;J

Pasteur admitted prior to his death (obviously translated from French) “the pathogen
is nothing; the terrain is everything.”
X W %#=S:H

J51>>1@$+E612 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%['_^%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%!?;::;J%/>=;9

So, why did Pasteur’s theory gain the ascendancy is the next question – answer –
follow the Big Pharma money train!
W W %#=S:H

I>,,@ %/=S%UVK%UWUX%_'W_%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%7L$?B9<J

Virology is a hoax, just like viruses.

W W %#=S:H

L)89? %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XU'\[%!2

The Spartacus Letter on COVID is below. It is well worth reading with lots of key points and
references, but it is hosted on a site with lots of pop-up spam. Click X on the pop-ups in the upper
right and only click on the actual original page download button. Use the up-and-down arrows to
read instead of the slider bar.

https://www.docdroid.net/kZZXcGS/covid-19-the-spartacus-letter-pdf
[ ]U %#=S:H

?,-6@ %/=S%UYK%UWUX%U'U[%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%#;Q<H

Tested site link using Android12/vpn/privateTab/brave:

Fast loading, NO pop-up’s, touch scroll, fast download. Just FYI. Thanks.
X ]X %#=S:H

8,926:$;<==>6 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%\'X^%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%#;Q<H

While there seems to be some useful aspects of the “Spartacus Letter”, how does one
reconcile the virus never being isolated in light of it.
\ W %#=S:H

+34516$.$/0-127 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%V'X\%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%#;Q<H
"DO;9
The Spartacus Letter is basically selling the reality of the ‘scary new virus’ narrative. Just
because it claims to be subversive doesn’t mean it actually is.
U ]X %#=S:H

.)840&' %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XX'_^%"2

More on Sweden: for the entire summer, they averaged less than 1 death per day from covid (they
openly admit that “covid deaths” there are counted as anyone with covid in the past 30 days).
Even with that wide berth, less than one death per day all of summer. That’s with no masks (they
were never mandated and almost nobody wears them, indoors or out). never any lockdowns,
very few measures (the last of which are about to be lifted), and no “covid passports” or vaccine
discrimination. There’s more fascinating details, but suffice it to say: any “counter-argument” you
may hear about Sweden’s success (they’re sparsely populated, they had many more deaths than
their neighbors, etc.) can be effectively and scientifically refuted.
V ]_ %#=S:H

C1,226 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%^'X^%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%2;Q?B=:

Did Sweden have strict control of travel in & out of the country? My son had a Sweden
roommate at college in US. At first word of Covid, his parents pulled him out & back to
Sweden. Taiwan is another country that had very low cases & no shutdown or mask
mandates, but strictly limited travel.
X W %#=S:H

KAC"'$M&G);$K"=+4(&?$L&A* %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XX'UY%"2

Another comment. I commend you for what you are doing. It is wonderful to see. Thank you very
much for your efforts.
V ]X %#=S:H

KAC"'$M&G);$K"=+4(&?$L&A* %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XX'U^%"2

Please see https://kevinloughrey.com.au/COVID/Facts.html

The table there was compiled using advice from experts around the world. The IFR for under 17
year olds is estimated to be in the vicinity of 4 per 10 million, ie, 0.00004%
I hope this is useful for you.
Y ]X %#=S:H

81>>$;1G6 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%\'_\%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%3>)L:%5=N;9%3LAM?C=H%#=>D

The mortality rate for “healthy” children in the UK (those without chronic or “life-altering”
medical conditions was approximately 1 in 2 million in the first year of the pandemic. This
mortality taken out to four decimal points is 0.0001 percent. So mortality rate for children 0
to 17 in the first year of the pandemic was literally 0.000 percent.

Here’s the UK study I based this extrapolation on:

https://uncoverdc.com/2021/07/30/for-majority-of-uk-children-covid-mortality-is-0-000/
\ W %#=S:H

:05&6 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%`'_[%"2

Great job!

I cannot find the source for the first graph concerning ASMR on section 2. “There has been NO
unusual excess mortality.”

Can someone help me please as it is quite an important piece of information.

_ W %#=S:H

/2K6>, %/=S%UYK%UWUX%U'[X%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%TBO=J

Sorry, I didn’t mean to hit the negative button … I can’t undo it

_ W %#=S:H

&9E %/=S%UYK%UWUX%V'U`%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%"9M=:B

FYI: votes can be undone. To remove a negative vote, just click on the upvote arrow; it will
effectively cancel (remove) the unwanted downvote.

Likewise, if one wishes to undo a positive vote, click on the downvote arrow.
\ W %#=S:H
 /2K6>, %/=S%UYK%UWUX%`'[_%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%*C>

Thank you! Done:)

U W %#=S:H

F9:69$*<GH %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XX'W[%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%"9M=:B

I used my upvote to offset.

Te absolvo
U W %#=S:H

?,-6@ %/=S%UYK%UWUX%_'_X%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%TBO=J

Why the downvote?

I thought maybe because I could have missed it on what seems to be the source given
(https://swprs.org/covid-19-mortality-overview/). I just triple-checked and that graph does
not show up. The graph itself does not give a source nor if it is global, by country etc.

I want to share the graph and have been looking for something just like it to show the people
screaming at me “everyone is dying!”. But I cannot if I have no source.

So, why the downvote instead of just providing the source?

If I am missing something please correct me instead of anon downvoting. Thank you.

X W %#=S:H

/2K6>, %/=S%UYK%UWUX%_'[\%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%TBO=J

As I said, I’m sorry … it was unintentional and I can’t undo it

_ W %#=S:H

?,-6@ %/=S%UYK%UWUX%\'WV%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%"9M=:B

Ah, we were responding at the same time. Thanks for clarifying.

_ W %#=S:H

?,-6@ %/=S%UYK%UWUX%\'XX%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%TBO=J

Timestamp says we werent replying at the same time but either way your
comment wasnt there when i wrote my response. I wouldnt have written all that
out otherwise. Perhaps it works out for the best as my question is hopefully more
clear now
U W %#=S:H

&9E %/=S%UYK%UWUX%V'_X%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%"9M=:B

Yes, you can– see my reply to your first apology.

W W %#=S:H

?,-6@ %/=S%UVK%UWUX%X'WY%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%TBO=J

Any information updates on this @offGuardian?

This article is spreading quickly and being translated globally as we speak. Every bit of
information is important.

Considering the graph is the very first one presented any “independent debunkers” will
probably use any unsourced material as a “debunk” and pro-covid pushers will use this graph
as a source of “misinformation” and as a reason to not continue reading.

Before the article gets translated and shared even more please clarify by either correcting
my mistake or by presenting the source.

Thank you for the time and otherwise seemingly thus far outstanding article.
W W %#=S:H

/"D0(* %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XU'W_%"2

How can I print out this great article? I need to hand it out to a lot of people.
V W %#=S:H

+,-$.$/0-12# %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XU'[V%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%.LEBCD
"DO;9
I did a quick PDF for you by saving the page on Safari browser. It’s a biggish file and not
ideally laid out, but here is a link you can download and in the meantime we will work on a
downloadable pdf. I hope that’s helpful. A2

Download here:
https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/30-facts-you-NEED-to-know-Your-
Covid-Cribsheet-–-OffGuardian.pdf
` ]X %#=S:H

D3L,90 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%X'\U%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%/BO%]%"DO;9U

Thank you very kindly. Unfortunately it is just one inch wide on the page but I will work
with it. I wonder if the author has a pdf of it he could upload for us as this article is
extremely important. I want to hand it out to doctors and police locally.
U ]X %#=S:H

-'&N %/=S%U^K%UWUX%XX'\Y%!2

The article is missing the data regarding:

1. Vaccines safty
a) vaccine adverse effects/deaths reported in VAERS db for USA
https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M?t=15006
Deaths:
https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M?t=15696

The number of deaths from covid vaccinations reported in VAERS for USA in less then 12 mths is
several times more than for all other vaccines together in the last 30 years.

other references
https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M?t=15762
https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M?t=15759
https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M?t=15913

b) data on adverse effects for EU

https://www.technocracy.news/shock-european-union-reports-1-5-million-vaccine-injuries-
15472-deaths/

c) vaccination of children (86% of children in Pfizer clinical trials experienced adverse effects)
https://www.usatomorrow.live/health/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-
reaction-to-the-pfizer-bs-vax-in-clinical-trial/

2. Vaccine efficacy
Current infection rates in Israel and Singapore despite high vaccination ratio (in Singapore 82%
while infection cases are currently highest ever recorded).

Israel
https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M?t=15326
https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M?t=16280
^ W %#=S:H

81>>$;1G6 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%\'\_%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%":=c

It is strange to me (well actually it isn’t) why there have been no major mainstream media
stories on the voluminous numbers of “adverse events” and deaths among the vaccinated. I
have read more stories than I can count about COVID victims, but really none about the tens
of thousands (hundreds of thousands, millions?) of people who have have severe negative
reactions. Here’s the main and sad take-away about COVID journalism: All topics that might
contradict the official narrative are taboo and off-limits to inquiry. The “watchdog” press is
not providing any “balance” to these stories. They are not skeptical of those who possess great
power. It actually seems like these group-thinking reporters are working to conceal relevant
truths and facts. This is the real untold story of COVID.
Y W %#=S:H

J51>>1@$+E612 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%['\X%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%I;::%#;Q=

MSM are complicit:

“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other
great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their
promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to
develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the lights of publicity during
those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a
world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world
bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination [democracy] practiced in
past centuries.”
—David Rockefeller in June 5, 1991 at the Bilderberger meeting in Baden, Germany (a
meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton).
X W %#=S:H

:J=? %/=S%U^K%UWUX%V'\`%!2

The Delta Strain is the vaccine…………………There is no Delta strain.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gigUyK3yLtMU/?fbclid=IwAR0EfsqVML18L-
5aanNNO1OXQ4L5UD27vA1T_O6ioSQTX-F4QKghZmN4_Tw

*************************************************************************************************

Proof you say? You must go down the rabbit hole for the truth………………………..

Does the Co-Virus Exist? No……the SARS-CoV-2 19 has not been Isolated? Freedom of
Information: There are no records of the SARS-CoV-2 isolation-purification.
The responses to these requests confirm that there is no record of isolation / purification of
SARS-CoV-2 “having been performed by anyone, anywhere, ever.”
“The 90 Health /Science institutions that have responded thus far have provided and/or cited, in
total, zero such records:

***************************************************************************************************
*

Has the “Killer Virus” been Identified. Has SARS-CoV-2 been Isolated?

The CDC Acknowledges that SARS-CoV-2 has not

been Isolated.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

The official CDC document, (dated July 21, 2021) entitled “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-
nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel reads as follows:

Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was
developed [January 2020] and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA
were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession:
MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human
A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. (emphasis added, page 40)

Compare the above statement to the CDC January 28th, 2020 advisory confirming the isolation
of SARS-CoV-2:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/does-the-virus-exist-the-sars-cov-2-has-not-been-isolated-
biggest-fraud-in-medical-history/5752066

**************************************************************************
X[ W %#=S:H

:J=? %/=S%U^K%UWUX%V'\Y%!2

PCR Inventor Dr. Kerry Mullis explains how his Nobel-winning test is Useless .
For Covid and can find virtually ‘Anything’ in the human body……

Vaxxed Zombies

We do not routinely perform RT-PCR on any patient who is overheated, coughing or has an
inflammatory syndrome!
**************************************************************

Oh really, just what test are they using??????

FDA announces that CDC’s PCR test failed review, will have emergency use authorization
revoked.

Why Is The CDC Quietly Abandoning The PCR Test For COVID?The Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) announced this week that its PCR test has failed its full review and will
have its Emergency Use Authorization revoked.The Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid
Qualitative Test, the CDC’s benchmark COVID diagnostic testing system, will be withdrawn for
Emergency Use by the end of 2021 due to an inordinate frequency of false positive and negative
results.

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-
CoV-2_Testing_1.html

Numerous epidemiological experts have argued that cycle thresholds are an important metric by
which patients, the public, and policymakers can make more informed decisions about how
infectious and/or sick an individual with a positive COVID-19 test might be.

However, as JustTheNews reports, health departments across the country are failing to collect
that data.Here are a few headlines from those experts and scientific studies:

1. Experts compiled three datasets with officials from the states of Massachusetts, New York and
Nevada that conclude:“Up to 90% of the people who tested positive did not carry a virus.”

2. The Wadworth Center, a New York State laboratory, analyzed the results of its July tests at the
request of the NYT: 794 positive tests with a Ct of 40: “With a Ct threshold of 35,
approximately half of these PCR tests would no longer be considered positive,” said the NYT.
“And about 70% would no longer be considered positive with a Ct of 30! “

3. An appeals court in Portugal has ruled that the PCR process is not a reliable test for Sars-Cov-2,
and therefore any enforced quarantine based on those test results is unlawful.

4. A new study from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, found that at 25 cycles of
amplification, 70% of PCR test “positives” are not “cases” since the virus cannot be cultured, it’s
dead. And by 35: 97% of the positives are non-clinical.

5. PCR is not testing for disease, it’s testing for a specific RNA pattern and this is the key pivot.
When you crank it up to 25, 70% of the positive results are not really “positives” in any clinical
sense, since it cannot make you or anyone else sickSo, in summary, with regard to our current
“casedemic”, positive tests as they are counted today do not indicate a “case” of anything.

They indicate that viral RNA was found in a nasal swab. It may be enough to make you sick, but
according to the New York Times and their experts, probably won’t. And certainly not sufficient
replication of the virus to make anyone else sick. But you will be sent home for ten days anyway,
even if you never have a sniffle. And this is the number the media breathlessly reports… and is
used to fearmonger mask mandates and lockdowns nationwide…
XU ]X %#=S:H

81>>$;1G6 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%['WU%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%T@AH

I wish some reporter would analyze and report on all of the “positive” cases that occurred at
colleges and among athletes and tell readers what percentage of positive tests were actually
asymptomatic. As most know, last year college and pro athletes were tested as often as 3
times per week. The data on asymptomatic cases is actually known by organizations doing
the testing (Including colleges), but most officials at these schools and sports leagues will
NOT disclose this information. I know. I’ve asked and was told this information was either not
available (certainly not true) or could not be disclosed (why?).

This mass testing – if the results had been published or shared with the public – would have
shown that the rate of asymptomatic cases is close to 80 or 90 percent (not the 40 percent
figure cited by the CDC). These results would also show that all of these super expensive
safety protocols aren’t even necessary. All those non-sick “close contacts” forced to quarantine
for 14 days could have been practicing and playing in games. All of those cancelled games did
not really need to be cancelled.

Why have all this testing data if it’s not even going to be revealed to the public?
W W %#=S:H

F9:69$*<GH %/=S%UVK%UWUX%XU'U[%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%T@AH

Which is why I call it Covoodoo.

W W %#=S:H

:"4; %/=S%U^K%UWUX%V'U\%!2

I’m also putting together a list of the untrustworthiness of musc of the establishment and MSM
News info around Cov. There’s so much out there. For example, there are endless occurrences of
leftist politicians and celebrities, who push everything Covid, not following their own demands.
U W %#=S:H

+0(?$1&;9);6 %/=S%U^K%UWUX%Y'\Y%!2

requests …

1. Therapeutics and the lack thereof (Pandemic, you got it, go home and take tylenol until we can.
ventilate you)
2. Hospital occupancy (98% of ICU covid cases are unvaccinated)
` ]XW %#=S:H

/>6M %/=S%UYK%UWUX%XU'XX%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%MBCH%R=9<;9J

You may want to check your sources re your point 2.

In Ireland 54% hospitalizations are vaccinated people

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/covid-54-of-hospital-patients-with-virus-are-
fully-vaccinated-1.4670229

In Israel nearly 60% hospitalizations are vaccinated people

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/public-health/nearly-60-of-hospitalized-covid-
19-patients-in-israel-fully-vaccinated-study-finds.html

In this hospital in Italy 100% hospitalizations are vaccinated people

https://m.cda.pl/video/845571002
XW ]U %#=S:H

J51>>1@$+E612 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%['[X%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%":=c

Absolutely – 2 things I can add here. The first is that they changed the definition of what
it means to be “vaccinated.” Therefore, if you die within 14 days of your shot, you are
counted as a “Covid death in the unvaccinated” as opposed to a “vaccine death.”
The second thing I have to add to this are a few more countries of interest. One is
Gibraltar, which claims a 100% fully vaxxed pop. Their Covid cases have recently
increased 2500%.
Another case in point is Singapore, again VERY highly vaxxed (more than Israel) everyone
got to the 80% fully vaxxed stage and cases kept climbing, so they re-imposed damaging
restrictions and moved the target up to 90% for freedom (you’ll see a lot of this “creep”).
And then we have India. This one is interesting because different states within India have
taken different routes – some went fully for the vax option (e.g. some of the southern
states) and others quickly switched to other methods (including Ivermectin). Uttar
Pradesh, the most populous state of India, flattened their curve by using Ivermectin etc.,
but the states that went fully in for the shots are not faring so well.
It rather appears that the countries who solely relied on the shots are faring very poorly,
which is completely unsurprising to me.
W W %#=S:H

C1,226 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%Y'[Y%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%MBCH%R=9<;9J

I believe the parentheses intentionally give the outrageous false info we are fed, and he
means to request the true stats.
W W %#=S:H

C;&.)9& %/=S%U^K%UWUX%Y'\[%!2

Numbers 31 and higher should include the contents of the vaccines.

Y ]X %#=S:H

J51>>1@$+E612 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%['[_%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%)9=2;<=

Not all ingredients have been listed by the companies, and graphene oxide (think
nanotechnology) has been found in all 4 major shots used in the west – Pfizer/NBiotech,
Moderna, J & J, and AstraZeneca. GO also causes “rouleau” (nice French word for clotting).
W W %#=S:H

-'0;$!(?*& %/=S%U^K%UWUX%^'[Y%!2

What of the number of severe cases, comas and long covid? The MSM have now shifted their
narrative to this, saying this more than justifies the vaccine.
X W %#=S:H

81>>$;1G6 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%['XW%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%":B9%ICHD=

They had no choice – too many vaccinated people were contracting the virus and spreading it
to others (and apparently now being hospitalized and dying). So “long COVID” became the
scare story they went to.

They also did this with pediatric cases. In my state, there was a flurry of stories several weeks
ago about steep rises in hospitalizations among children. It took only a cursory glance at the
numbers to see that fewer than 2 percent of hospitalized cases were children … and the group
that makes up children (0 to 18) makes up about 25 percent of the total population. So 1/4 of
the population comprised only 1/60th of hospitalizations … and virtually no children were
dying from COVID. But the Pediatrician Groups doubled down on the “long Covid” storyline.
W W %#=S:H

:05&6$.0*)6"; %/=S%U^K%UWUX%^'\Y%!2

Thank you, thank you! This is everything people need to know. Excellent research and writing!

I would make one edit to point 24. Change “Vaccines” to “The vaccines,” which is how you refer to
the vaccines in point 25. In general, vaccines do confer immunity. It’s the phony COVID vaccines
that do not.
U ]U %#=S:H

81>>$;1G6 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%['XU%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%TBO=J%2BD;JL9

The CDC literally changed the definition of “vaccine” and “immunity” on its website. That was
quite a tell to some of us and is something the masses don’t know but need to know.
_ W %#=S:H

J51>>1@$+E612 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%['[[%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%I;::%#;Q=

They had also changed the definition of “pandemic” ahead of time in 2009. Death
definitions have been changed for death certificates, and much more. Definition changes
often indicate that data is being manipulated for an agenda.
X W %#=S:H

A4"506 %/=S%U^K%UWUX%^'UU%!2

to elaborate on the ingredients of these “vaccines”,would be helpful, there are studies in the US
and Spain confirming graphene oxide as one of the adjuvents, manufactures don’t list all or no
ingredients on their inserts
^ W %#=S:H

J51>>1@$+E612 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%['[^%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%>?LOBJ

GO is not an adjuvant, although they’d like you to believe that’s why it is there. GO is a
component of nanotechnology. I would encourage some research on supra-magnetic
nanoparticles and transhumanism.
X W %#=S:H

J&"(+)0;0$C0G&;*)64 %/=S%U^K%UWUX%^'X`%!2

With the masks, you should consider the OSHA standards for Asbestos. What a lot of people do
not understand is that the masks required to work in an asbestos space (a natural occurring fiber
LARGER than a virus) is a mask that seals with 2 canister filters. The sealing means that the
plastic portion attaches to the skin and that there are ties going around the head. This prevents
air from leaking in and out, This is also the training that Sailors receive for gas masks, submarine
loss of oxygen and nuclear spaces. This is not new information and much of it has been around
for decades. A sneeze carrying viruses in it has force behind it (projectile). It doesn’t make logical
sense that a mask that you can’t wear in an asbestos space with asbestos fibers in the air is
somehow going to protect you from droplet projectiles with the velocity gained through a cough
or sneeze.
V W %#=S:H

@0AA? %/=S%U^K%UWUX%^'WV%!2

I have been telling my family and friends for months -“Where are all the flu deaths?” Now I know
I’m not crazy. Thanks.
X[ W %#=S:H

J51>>1@$+E612 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%['[`%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%!B>>H

Many cases of ‘flu’ have likely been attributed to Covid, just like gun shot wound deaths, car
accidents etc. If they could run a covid test when you were admitted, they could count these
as “covid deaths” and I suspect hospitals are being paid more for “covid” deaths. I’ve certainly
heard this is the case in the US, where they get paid $39,000 for each person they put on a
ventilator.
W W %#=S:H

!);N %/=S%U^K%UWUX%['[`%!2

Fantastic article! Thank you.

I would add something on the lack of virus isolation. Anywhere. No one can produce it. FOI
requests all over the world come up empty, etc.

https://trustthescience.net/?page_id=75
XU W %#=S:H

LOCMP %/=S%U^K%UWUX%['[V%!2

You guys need to read this discussion and include its points into your list. Very disturbing insights
here.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243127
[ W %#=S:H

8)A)Q&; %/=S%U^K%UWUX%['WY%!2

I have had two strokes. I am waiting for the 3rd one to end it. Vaccine Adverse Event Testimonies
https://www.bitchute.com/video/U3RwqTbqj8HC/
X W %#=S:H

%"'?$J0(8)0 %/=S%U^K%UWUX%\'\`%!2

“Covid’s survival rate is at least 99.5%”

No, in Peru it isn’t. 0.6% of the total population have already died from covid in Peru. Presumably
not everyone has been infected.

But as you well said, religion is unaffected by fact. If you can believe that Jesus was the son of a
virgin, you can well believe that the stats of covid are lies, and choose which way the lies go,
because why not? You are just engaging in believing something because you choose to believe it.
\ ][U %#=S:H

D,93>0$I3621K %/=S%U^K%UWUX%['_V%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%,L:H%@BCQ;B

Remarkable! How does insulting Christians clarify the question?

The article says COVID was over-diagnosed and deaths after a (doubtful) diagnosis were said
to be because of COVID, but that’s not necessarily clear.
X_ W %#=S:H

?,-6@ %/=S%U^K%UWUX%^'W\%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%,L:H%@BCQ;B

.6% died… that means 99.4% survived. Do you even understand percentages? 99.5% survival
is an AVERAGE. .6% falls in line with that average.
UW W %#=S:H

*1-$F,>>32 %/=S%U^K%UWUX%V'U\%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%TBO=J

I remember hearing a shadow government minister saying that the Government of the
day were failing on education as 50% of school pupils had below average academic
attainment.
Y W %#=S:H

A,>039B %/=S%UVK%UWUX%U'\U%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%$;O%ZB::L9

“The morons we elect” – Volume 67…

W W %#=S:H

%,@1-G6, %/=S%U^K%UWUX%Y'X^%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%,L:H%@BCQ;B

0.6% died means 99.5% survived.

\ W %#=S:H

;64,9,E132@ %/=S%U^K%UWUX%Y'X^%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%,L:H%@BCQ;B

Most people in the world, including myself, not being Christian, your absurd comparison is
just plain stupid.
V W %#=S:H

F9:69$*<GH %/=S%UVK%UWUX%XU'\W%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%,L:H%@BCQ;B

Which applies equally to disbelieving something just because one chooses to disbelieve it.
Evidence insufficient to convince me, is not necessarily evidence insufficient to convince
another and certainty not coterminous with universally insufficient evidence.

For that matter, insufficient evidence is merely insufficient evidence.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Reasoning from an a priori premise that there is ONLY a material universe does not strike me
as particularly Scientific or useful in free inquiry.
X W %#=S:H

H)89 %/=S%U^K%UWUX%\'U[%!2

Thank you for such a well

Throughout and through summary. I would like to add the below references that may aid or
contribute to your article:

Inventor of mRNA vaccine dr Robert Malone:

https://youtu.be/iwPKnOhJRYg

Director of medicine for Trinidad and Tobago, advisory board member on FDA, reporting on
cross national studies:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vTFMMasGQPyb/?
fbclid=IwAR11_S7ZIeSi3Iqdm_071fcd0790YcHVY5Ngykaeg-h24QH2EWPvpiyH-Mo

Harvard Epidemiologist speaking out against the vaccine passport:

https://youtu.be/GMcBUujrlsw

Summary of a German commission on corona (160 doctors, experts and 2 Nobel prize winning
virologists/epidemiologists giving testimony over weeks):

https://www.bitchute.com/video/w8vNSY9Vve53/

Luc Montagnier Nobel prize winner who discovered hiv speaks out against the vaccine:
https://youtu.be/gcXaaCy72tA

Consulting medical director at WHO:

https://rumble.com/vivkrl-astrid-stuckelberger-who-whistleblower-vaccines-as-a-
bioweapon-to-depopulat.html

Israeli doctor – head of his department oversaw thousands of cases:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/iaLlZN0q8rjk/

Full Israeli study:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full.pdf

FDA advisory board committee (8 hours long, will put time stamps in, but 3 hours 11 minutes
before end they discuss spike protein in reproductive organs):
https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M

Doctor and founder of research institute of Rhode Island conducting a study with 5000 corona
patients:
https://youtu.be/tcAHvj6B1Nk
Whistleblower administrator and on-site nurse reporting for the vaers system:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/e2NnMSB589Vj/

Medical patent lawyer blowing the whistle on big Pharma:

https://catherineedwards.life/aiovg_videos/a-manufactured-illusion-dr-david-martin-with-
reiner-fuellmich-9-7-21/

Pathologist going over autopsies of those who died after the vaccine:
https://philosophers-stone.info/2021/09/17/scientist-shows-vaccine-effects-in-autopsies-
dont-believe-it-see-for-yourself/

Dr Ian flemming whistleblower on toxicity of graphene oxide spike protein:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DWBdwJgukF2J/

Leaked zoom call of hospital administrators:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/8o9WT7HYXVEb/

Phd in medicine siting numerous studies:

https://principia-scientific.com/covid-19-vaccine-mandates-are-now-pointless/

Concentration camps in Australia:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZHb8XzLzdmbO/

Doctor on Moderna risk warnings:

https://youtu.be/qDpf6UJchxA

Whistleblower on Vaers report on adverse affects:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MHhqlFH2NFF6/

Israeli study article

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/ends-debate-israeli-study-shows-natural-immunity-
13x-more-effective-vaccines-stopping

Article on female reproductivity after vaccine:

https://nypost.com/2021/09/07/nih-to-study-how-covid-19-vaccine-impacts-menstrual-cycle/

Harrowing documentary on vaccine death in infants

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ijI50EmoQZid/

CDC secretly releases real numbers:

https://youtu.be/_lFlDSPAcmU
UW W %#=S:H

*5,2H$N3< %/=S%U^K%UWUX%XW'X^%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%7;Q<

I appreciate your effort to compile/post the links.

I posted them for easy reference/sharing here:
https://telegra.ph/Misc-Covid-09-26
_ W %#=S:H

3"5 %/=S%U^K%UWUX%X'X^%!2

PLEASE update this article to include all the early successful treatments that have been available
from the beginning that are being censored like the FLCCC protocol. Why in the world would this
be left out????
X^ ]X %#=S:H

J51>>1@$+E612 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%^'XW%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%$LO

I agree, definite mention needs to be made of the blocking access to other effective drugs,
which was done because you cannot grant an Emergency Use Authorization for a “vaccine” if
there are effective treatments already available. This has been borne out already with the
change of heart in the EU, where they have apparently authorized 5 treatments for “covid”
and will be ending shots and passports in October. 2 of the “solutions” pushed are ventillation
and Remdesivir – both of which are harmful, often fatally so. The only other drug approved in
Oz (apart from Remdesivir, which killed lots of people in West Africa when used against
Ebola) is a monoclonal antibody treatment which is also an EXPERIMENTAL drug, just as the
shots are. Ivermectin and HCQ have been blocked, because they are not as harmful and are
effective. So, we are seeing more evidence of INVERSION, which is a huge red flag to those in
the know.
W W %#=S:H

,40(";$I'6";R$%I %/=S%U^K%UWUX%^'[_%"2

I have been licensed in medicine for 50 years and we must go after the insurance,
pharmaceutical, hospitals and the doctors who agree to do their dirty work! The corruption is
rampant! They make so much money by keeping people sick and ordering doctors not to help
anyone! Do not trust any Doctor Who is taking Insurance money.
_U ]X %#=S:H

81>>$;1G6 %/=S%UYK%UWUX%['X[%!2

%#=S:H%>L%%/?BCL9%*:JL9K%,*

It’s apparent that very few physicians are speaking up for their patients or are willing to go
against the public health bureaucracies. The physicians who have said what they really think
are being threatened with the loss of their medical licenses or other punishments meant to
silence them. This is also terrifying.
\ W %#=S:H

J51>>1@$+E612 %/=S%UVK%UWUX%^'XX%"2

%#=S:H%>L%%I;::%#;Q=

It’s called tyranny.

W W %#=S:H

Load More Comments

%%

)LSHC;M?>%d%UWUX%*a@ABCD;B9P
!C;NBQH%!L:;QHP
SLE=C=D%GH%6LCD!C=JJ%P
$?=O='%*a@ABCD;B9%GH%6;:D%#=B:;>HP9=>%P